We need a new section entitled:  Issues With Apple Customer Service

"This Feedback about the Discussions forum is intended for questions about how to use Apple Discussions and for general constructive feedback about how the Discussions system is operating or how it may be improved. Please use this forum appropriately. Failure to do so may result in your posting privileges to this forum being disabled.
If your question concerns a hardware or software technical issue, please do not post in this forum — instead, go to the Apple Discussions Homepage, select an appropriate product category and follow the links until you reach the correct forum for your post, then click the Post New Topic link. "
Alright, I have a suggestion for improvement. We need a new forum section for complaints about the way Apple is treating us.
To make sure I'm being clear, let me give you an example of just such a post that may be included in such a section.
I ordered online the family packs of Leopard, iWork '08 and iLife '08 on November 6th. I received an email telling me my order had been shipped on November 7th.
On November 9th I decided to check the progress of my shippment by logging on to FedEx. To my surprise, it had been delivered! Not to me but another party. I could download a PDF from FedEx and see the signature.
After trying to deal with FedEx for a few days I was finally told to deal with Apple because they would have to initiate the investigation. Fine. These things happen.
On 11/13/2007 I spoke with an Apple Customer Service Representative and received an Apple Issue Number and Case Number. I was told that it should be resolved in a few days. It wasn't.
11/20/2007, Here's where it gets interesting. In talking with them again I explained that since my signature was not on the FedEx ticket it had not been delivered properly if at all. I explained that since FedEx was clearly at fault the package should be shipped again. Finally they agreed. I was told that my package would be shipped and to expect an email.
11/23/2007, I was told again that nothing would be shipped until after an investigation had been completed. So did they lie? I spoke with a manager who kept repeating that he was sorry for the mis-communication. That became very frustrating to say the least. Remember, FedEx requires a signature. Without it or my permission to deliver somewhere else they must deliver to me and get my signature. The FedEx PDF clearly shows another persons signature.
Equally frustrating is the fact that they will not keep me informed as to the status. I have to call them and wait on hold. I did get a couple of emails with text along the lines of, "We continue to work with our carrier on your lost package. "
However, there is no way to reply to these form letters. The only way to stay in touch with Apple is to call and be put on hold.
Twice, after giving them my order number and being put on hold "while they look up my records" or whatever, the call was disconnected. I'm not saying they did so on purpose but the results were the same. Another call, another round of giving my order number and explaining to yet again a new person the details of the situation.
I've had many problems with Apple since becoming a customer in June of 2006 but I just can't let this go. I need a place to warn others. If you buy something, you might be better off buying it from a store instead of on-line. This kind of information is needed to warn others concerning the business practices of Apple should something go wrong. This is why we need a new section for putting forth such complaints.

It seems to me that the real problem here is with FedEx, as I have encountered similar types of problems with them in the past. Even though a signature is required, I have had packages left on my porch. When I enquired, someone had actually signed (i.e.forged) my name! Other times it has been left on my porch with some other signature. When I call to complain, FedEx just seems to think there is no problem as long as I got my package. They seem totally unconcerned even though a signature is required and I definitely did not authorize delivery with no signature. I have expressed my concerns directly to Apple, but have no way of knowing if it has done any good. I think this problem is worse with FedEx ground, as that is contracted out. Around here anyway, i think the drivers will sign the ticket and leave the package just so they won't have to make another trip. It's not right, and it's not supposed to happen this way, but i know it does.
Apple entrusted your package to FedEx in good faith that it would be delivered to you, and that your signature would be required for you to receive it. That should have resulted in you receiving it. however, due to a false signature, you did not. Clearly, FedEx is responsible.
If the package was supposedly delivered to your address, but has a false signature, I wonder if the driver might have signed the delivery ticket or gotten someone else to sign it and just left it on your porch or something like that. If so, it could have been subsequently stolen. If something like this happened, it might explain why things are so bogged down in the investigation at Apple. From their viewpoint, the package was delivered and a signature was obtained and they are probably being stonewalled by FedEx.
A user to user discussion forum such as Apple Discussions won't help with delivery problems. It's best to report them directly to Apple as you have done. If you continue to have problems, you can call Apple and ask to speak to Apple Customer Relations. They may well be able to cut through the red tape. You could also express your concern in the "Feedback to Apple" section. Maybe if enough people complain, they might consider awarding the shipping contract to someone else. Or perhaps the other shippers are even worse.
One of my recent shipments was evidently lost in a typhoon. But when I called Apple, a replacement was sent out immediately. This is more what I would expect of Apple, and you have every right to expect similar treatment.
If FedEx delivered to the wrong address and got a wrong signature, they should be expected to go back and retrieve the package. But if they delivered to your address and did not get your signature, then you would be well within your rights to go to your local Better Business Bureau and file a complaint against FedEx. That might possibly get some action of some sort. FedEx cannot ignore the BBB as easily as they can ignore you. If your signature was actually forged, you will certainly be able to prove that the signature on the delivery ticket is definitely not yours. And you could forward the BBB complaint to Apple. I don't know if this would help or just muddy the water, but it would put a little more pressure on FedEx I would think.
In the meantime, I would certainly speak to Apple Customer Relations and see if they can help you out here. They want happy Apple customers, and I think they would like to know about the extreme frustrations you are experiencing through no fault of your own.
I sympathize with your problems, and I hope that you are able to get them resolved soon.
Good luck!

Similar Messages

  • Disappointment with Apple customer service's response to my iMac G5 issues

    The following is a copy of the letter that I will be sending to Apple in regards to my recent dealings with customer service. What do you guys think I should do?
    To whom it may concern:
    Let me begin by saying that I have been a loyal and avid fan of the Mac since 1999. I have converted several of my PC friends to the Mac, and I would consider myself to be the quintessential Mac "geek" (posters, T-shirts, you name it). I have owned a Macintosh LC 575, Power Macintosh G3 (Blue & White) and Power Mac G4 Cube, in addition to my current machine, an iMac G5. However, my recent experiences with Apple customer support have left me thinking that maybe the Mac way is not the smooth, customer-first experience that I thought it was.
    As I mentioned, I currently am using an iMac G5 (rev. A, 20" 1.8 GHz). Unfortunately, the iMac was a victim of the well-documented power supply issue (http://www.apple.com/support/imac/re...ensionprogram/) several months back. The power supply would heat up to such high temperatures that it eventually burned out, and I could not power on the machine. I brought it in to my local Apple Store (Oakbrook, IL), whereupon they wrote up a repair order, and I had my Mac back within 4 days, all without paying a penny. "Wow, excellent no-hassle service," I thought, and rightfully so.
    Over the last couple of months, my iMac has further developed a couple of smaller, but still annoying and "not-very-Apple-like" issues. First, the fans have developed a consistent, cricket-like squeak - that is, you can hear the fans turning, sort of like an old wheel that needs oil. In my quiet office, it is VERY obvious, and is especially distressing when I'm trying to do audio and MIDI work. The second issue is that the slot-loading Superdrive has gotten to the point where discs that are being ejected often fly out of the slot and do not stop, falling onto the top of my desk, or occasionally clear off the desk onto the floor.
    A few days ago, I decided that I had had enough with both issues, and decided to initiate a chat with a support agent on Apple's iMac support web page. After explaining the issues to the agent, I was transferred to a "specialist," to whom I then had to re-explain the issues. Further irritating me was the fact that they provided me no solution other than to visit my local Apple Store, and they would further diagnose the system.
    So tonight I headed over to the Apple Store Oakbrook with the iMac in tow (mind you, not the lightest thing to be carrying around, and a pain to have to disconnect peripherals etc.). I had made an appointment prior to showing up...in fact, Apple's new Concierge system seemed very elegant and user-friendly, and I was able to make a 7:20pm appointment at around 2:30pm. I made it to the Apple Store at about 6:50pm, and saw my name listed on the Genius Bar screens as being 2nd in line. There was a man with a 15" PowerBook that was being helped by the Genius behind the bar, so I sat and waited patiently. About 40 minutes into my wait, a woman with an iPod mini walked up to the bar, seemingly waiting for assistance. Within two minutes, another Apple employee approached her, briefly looked at me and asked if I was waiting for help. When I said I needed assistance with my iMac, he told me that I would have to wait for the next Genius, turned to the woman with the iPod mini and proceeded to diagnose her problem.
    Further irritated, I waited another 10 minutes or so, at which point the same employee turned his attention to me. I explained the fan and Superdrive issues to him, and he took the iMac to the back room for another employee to take a look at it. About 10 minutes later, he came back out with the iMac and said something to me that just floored me. He told me that his colleague that looked at it could not find anything inherently wrong with the fans, and that "since it's not a Pro desktop, there are bound to be squeaks in the fan system" (almost verbatim what he said). He said that they cleaned the fans, and tightened the eject mechanism in the Superdrive, and that if I continue to have issues with it to bring it back in and they will further diagnose it.
    The message I have taken from this experience is two-fold. First, Apple has officially gone from being a computer company to a consumer electronics company. The fact that I literally was skipped over after waiting 40 minutes and pushed aside for an iPod user who had waited TWO minutes and was not in the Genius Bar queue shows that Apple's priorities have shifted. Secondly, Apple does not truly back the quality and craftsmanship on which they pride themselves. Just because I do not own a "Pro desktop," that should not mean that a squeaky fan system is an acceptable situation. I bought an $1,800 computer that was advertised as "whisper-quiet" and I should not have to pay $3,000+ just to be reassured that I will be taken care of. I expect excuses and glancing over of issues by companies like Dell that make cheap bare-bones systems. I do not expect that from Apple - if Apple is going to hold themselves to a higher standard, they should back up that talk with true customer-first service.
    So I am now sitting in front of my rickety-sounding iMac, wondering what my next step should be. I appreciate you taking the time to read this, and I would further appreciate a follow-up and resolution to this situation.
    Thoughts?

    Send it. I feel for you, but the most sympathy you'll get is from fellow users on this board. These forums were one of the best ideas by Apple. Whoever thought it up is probably getting 1% of iPod sales as commission. Besides users helping users so Apple doesn't have to handle nearly as much tech support directly, this board is also a place for people to vent so Apple doesn't have to address your concerns. I'm not saying these boards are a bad thing ... they are very helpful, but you have better odds at winning the lottery grand prize than you do to get a reply back from Apple from a letter like this.

  • New RAM and issues with apple hardware test

    I just upgraded to 4gb of Samsung memory in my Macbook Pro. I had several issues with the computer continuously rebooting. I went into Apple Hardware Test and tested the memory. One of the dimms failed immediately so I pulled it and tested the other. It seemed to just go to around 6-10 minutes and just not do anything after that. The cursor still moves but nothing else.
    I had them replaced with Samsung original even though the computer came with Nanya. My previous Macbook Pro had Samsung and I had good luck with it. This is a Santa Rosa platformed 2.4 Ghz version with the 7200 rpm 160 gb hard drive. I'm also running Leopard but that should be independent of the apple hardware test since the OS is not required to boot into it.
    Any help is greatly appreciated.
    Thanks

    Evidently its not freezing. It just doesn't update often. Its at nearly two hours now. I wasn't giving it enough time to run.

  • I would like to speak with apple customer service, they won't answer my call unless I pay 40 odd $ - not nice

    I have a speck behind the screen - It is not a dead pixel, and its is no coffee spot - cause it would then be on the outer side - I went to the genius bar in NY and they agreed it was behind the screen. And nothing I would have been able to put it. The problem is they want $500 plus to fix it. Something I did not put there! the bigger problem is I am out of warranty - I got the 17' Mac Book Pro in Ny and a day later left the country and returned only last month, two years later. I noticed the speck only after 3months after my purchase. Its not big but its an eyesore. Especally when I work on Photographs and edit my films. I am not paying $40 just so customer service even agrees to talk to me. Sad but true

    I got that part and yes it is totally my fault, I did show it to the apple rep. there, he had no idea what that speck/spot behind the screen was and how it got there, just like the rep. in NY at the genius bar, any way the rep. there wanted to take it in and open it up, and seriously speaking I was not confident in him, specially when he did not even know how or what it was. I had too much stuff already in there and I don't think they had that generation laptop there yet. Plus who wants his brand new machine opened/fixed that soon. Just in case I wanted to there would not be a resale value for that. 
    You would really have to look at it to wonder. Any way I serioulsy think its a good study matter. I did not even know that there were two films, or glasses on the screen - because it looks embeded. Until you see it you would not know but when you do it never goes. I am not a tech. but if I were I would definitely want to get to the bottom of it. Maybe I should just pay Apple to figure the issue, but am afraid that $40 plus would jsut go towards nothing as they would then tell me to pay the fixing charges and believe me its just a speck I wish I had never noticed other than the fact that I keep thinking I should move back to Sony. I mean I love ripping out my Macbook Pro at film meets. And I do need a faster machine soon.
    Thanks for your response and stand for Apple, but I had reasons to act the way I did then, and I am simply going to bear the consequence - but this msg. will help me and future buyers to pay heed and act before expecting too much, There is no free lunch, then again I don't want to pay for lunch I already don't like or may not like.
    Thanks again

  • Issues with Verizon customer service

    Question 1: Just wondering--If a verizon representative promised you the early termination fee (ETF) would be waived and you have it in writing aren't they obligated to waive the fee?
    Story: I have had verizon service for seven years. In early June my Android broke and I connected an old flip phone until I could get a new one. I was told by the service associate that I would not lose my Verizon unlimited package as long as I upgraded my device within 14 business days of having the flip phone on my account. I upgraded on day 12 which was June 21, 2012 (Before the Unlimited plans were taken away by the greedy company). I found out when my bill came in that they took away my unlimited and put me on a data plan but were still charging me the same. I fought with them every month after being told over and over that I was given my unlimited back. This went on until November of which they started submitting requests which continued to come back denied. After six months of fighting I just wanted to get rid of Verizon. Furious at their breach of contract I requested to terminate my service. I was told by the rep (I requested that promise in writing and have two e-mails to prove it) that the early termination fee would be waived because the reason I was canceling after seven years was due to Verizon's error. Well, my service was terminated on January 5, 2013 and I received an e-mail that my final bill was available. I was expecting a refund but low and behold they still are trying to charge me the ETF. They are trying to charge me $316.65. I just got off the phone with them and they are saying that the associate who promised that the ETF would be waived was not authorized to do so. Honestly, I don't care if she was not authorized to do it, it was promised (yes, just like my unlimited was). It should be taken off the final bill and I should receive a refund for overpayment of the last bill. I still don't understand how they claim I was even under contract because I didn't sign a contract for anything other than my unlimited plan.
    Question 2: Can I hire an attorney to fix this mess if they continue to refuse the waiver?
    Either way, I'm not going to pay it and if it goes to collections I will continue to fight it. None of this was my error, it was theirs. I'm so fed up!

    Just for reference, here are the e-mails from the verizon wireless rep (minus her full name and my e-mail for privacy reasons):
    First e-mail:
    From: "K" <@VerizonWireless.com>
    To: " <j>
    Sent: Friday, November 30, 2012 6:07 PM
    Subject: Contact me
    If the IPR gets denied again I will waive the ETF personally.
    Then my response to the first e-mail a short time after:
    From: ME []
    Sent: Monday, December 10, 2012 9:45 AM
    To: Verizon--name and e-mail not provided for privacy purposes
    Subject: Re: Contact me
    Hi K,
    I just wanted to check the status of my Verizon account. They should be reinstating my unlimited everything. I've been going through this since June. Please call me and let me know what is going on. Thank you!
    Regards,
    Verizon's Second e-mail:
    From: "K" <@VerizonWireless.com>
    To: 'ME' <>
    Sent: Thursday, December 13, 2012 12:56 PM
    Subject: RE: Contact me
    Hi J!
    I just wanted you to know that I just applied the credit for the Early Termination Fee for you as promised. I tried to re-submit it back to the department and they denied the request for me. I just wanted you to know that the account’s ETF is waived for you of 290.00.
    I apologize about the inconvenience of the situation and I hope you have a wonderful holiday season!
    END OF MESSAGE
    Since posting this I have filed a complaint with the Better Business Bureau. I've also found that since the representative is an agent of the company tasked to handle discrepancies like mine and her information which I have in writing is that if Verizon chooses not to honor this (in addition to their breach of my Unlimited contract) it is a complete violation of the Uniform Commercial Code.

  • Could anyone show me how to file a complaint with Verizon Customer Service?

    I would first like to state that this is my first time having an issue with Verizon Customer Service.In all my years of using their service, I had never run into someone that truly had no idea what they were talking about. I would like to file a complaint to save everyone from experiencing the frustration I am feeling and from wasting your time.
    Here is the story, so that you can understand the reason why I would like to file a complaint;
    My phone has always had an SD Card in addition to the phone memory because my phone memory is already tiny, less than 1 GB.I put things that cannot be put on my SD Card (my text messages, contacts, etc.).
    This past week I kept on receiving air messages that my phone memory was full. I deleted most of my text messages but I still received air messages that my phone memory was "full".  I therefore decided to call Verizon Wireless to see if they could help me solve my problem or at least educate me on what was taking space in my phone memory.
    Well, I unfortunately had the luck of being connected with a representative named "Naima" and I told her about my phone memory problem. She said she knew how to fix my problem and instructed me to click on the "Format SD Card" button. Following her instructions blindly, I never once stopped to consider that clicking on that button would erase everything. And so  ALL my pictures, ringtones, and videos were erased.
    Trying to fix her mistake she dug herself into a deeper hole. Instead of admitting that she had made a mistake she claimed that my pictures, ringtones, and videos could be recovered, She had me access Backup Assistant, but my stuff was NOT saved there. I later learned that my phone's Backup Assistant can only save contacts, NOT pictures. She knew what phone I had (representatives have all the phone's info and history) yet she led me in circles and wasted my time and could not own up to her mistake.
    What upsets me is the fact that she did not even KNOW that the phone memory and SD Card are 2 COMPLETELY DIFFERENT things.And also she could not own up to her mistake, but instead wasted at least an hour of my time trying to get Backup Assistant to do something it could not.
    I then attempted to file a complaint to found that Verizon makes it Virtually Impossible to file a complaint, only through MAIL! Really??

    Well actually sending a certified return receipt letter to Verizon Wireless may or may not do any good. you can also file a complaint here http://www.bbb.org
    Those out of memory messages usually mean internal memory is getting full. I have no idea of your make and model of device but there are many articles via google that tell you how to transfer files from internal memory to sd card memory.
    Now on the off chance your sd card is nearing its capacity you can either hook to your computer via usb and the computer will show two drive letters. One is internal memory and the other is the sd card memory. If its internal memory and your sd card is not full you can drag and drop the files to the sd card. However you can also get a card reader and then make a saved files folder on your desktop, then cut and paste any or all movable files to that new folder you just created. its really very easy.
    You can also remove files from internal memory (music, photos,documents) to that folder on your desktop. You can also remove all files and photos from the sd card on a regular basis to never have that low memory problem again. I always purchase the largest sd card that is usable on my device and never save anything like music and photos to internal memory.

  • Sound issues with Apple TV show rentals/"choppy" sound quality

    I have been renting "Lost" episodes from the iTunes store on my new Apple TV. There is something wrong with the sound quality. It's very choppy. Almost like a fan is cutting up the sound. Anyone else experience this problem? What's the fix?

    Hello there, cjb1992.
    The following Knowledge Base articles offer up some great steps for troubleshooting audio issues with Apple TV:
    Apple TV: HDMI audio stops working
    http://support.apple.com/kb/TS2090
    No audio when using Apple TV
    http://support.apple.com/kb/TS3789
    Thanks for reaching out to Apple Support Communities.
    Cheers,
    Pedro.

  • So, about a week ago my macbook pro started having lots of issues: wifi connectivity, slow performance, sound issues, spotlight wasn't working. After going through the issues with apple support, they decided the best course of action was to erase it...

    So, about a week ago my macbook pro started having lots of issues: wifi connectivity, slow performance, sound issues, spotlight wasn't working. After going through the issues with apple support, they decided the best course of action was to erase the hard drive and do a reinstall. Since I have a recent backup this seemed like a good enough option. They were kind enough to send me a copy of the snow leopard disk to do the install since we couldn't get it to complete through the disk utility. Not sure why, since it says we are fully connected, it just never completed.
    Anyway, so now that you have the background here is the new issue. The macbook pro keeps spitting out the disk I'm trying to install from. Disk utility and using the 'Startup Disk' function from the apple menu doesn't read the disk.
    Can anyone suggest a solution to this vexing problem?
    Thanks in advance.

    Jeremy.Laurin,
    have you tried agb76’s approach here?

  • Why did carefully over heating my 4s restore the wifi function? This, after 2 months of mysteriously grey out wifi buttons, loads of time trying to resolve issue with apple tech only to be told I must pay $199 to repair the problem. I'm disillusioned now

    Why did carefully over heating my 4s restore the wifi function? This, after 2 months of mysteriously grey out wifi buttons, loads of time trying to resolve issue with apple tech only to be told I must pay $199 to repair the problem. I'm disillusioned now

    Is the Wi-Fi button greyed out?  Try this article: http://support.apple.com/kb/TS1559
    Also, make a backup to iTunes of the device.  Then restore it as a new device.  If you still have wi-fi greyed out, then contact Apple again, and explain that you believe you have a hardware issue.  They may still ask for a $19 deposit, but if it is actually hardware related, then you won't be charged the $19.  Only if it is software related do you get charged that $19.

  • New Tax Code Creation with CST and Service Tax

    Hi
    I want to know the complete procedure of new tax code creation with CST and Service Tax. I want to know the steps for calculation of % of that Tax Code.
    Kindly help me out.
    Thanks
    Kshipra G

    Hi Expert,
    Before creating a Tax Code, Create two Condition Types(T-Code: OBYZ) for CST and Service Tax, which need to Select the below Items
    Cond. class -  D - Taxes
    Calculat.type -  A - Percentage
    Cond.category - D - Tax
    and while creating a Tax Procedure just select the Condition Type of CST and Service Tax and provide the Account Key for both Condition Types.
    Assign the GL Accounts to the Account Keys in T-Code: OB40.
    Create a Tax Code in T-Code: FTXP, which is to be assigned in T-Code: FV11.
    Maintain the percentage in T-Code: FV11, with your Key Combination and
    Try this procedure, which will help you...
    Regards,
    GK
    SAP

  • Performance issue with a Custom view

    Hi ,
    I am pretty new to performance tuning and facing a performance issue with a custom view.
    Execution time for view query is good but as soon as I append a where caluse to view query ,the execution time increases.
    Below is the view query:
    CREATE OR REPLACE XXX_INFO_VIEW AS
    SELECT csb.system_id license_id,
    cst.name license_number ,
    csb.system_type_code license_type ,
    csb.attribute3 lac , -- license authorization code
    csb.attribute6 lat , -- license admin token
    csb.attribute12 ols_reg, -- OLS Registration allowed flag
    l.attribute4 license_biz_type ,
    NVL (( SELECT 'Y' l_supp_flag
    FROM csi_item_instances cii,
    okc_k_lines_b a,
    okc_k_items c
    WHERE c.cle_id = a.id
    AND a.lse_id = 9
    AND c.jtot_object1_code = 'OKX_CUSTPROD'
    AND c.object1_id1 = cii.instance_id||''
    AND cii.instance_status_id IN (3, 510)
    AND cii.system_id = csb.system_id
    AND a.sts_code IN ('SIGNED', 'ACTIVE')
    AND NVL (a.date_terminated, a.end_date) > SYSDATE
    AND ROWNUM < 2), 'N') active_supp_flag,
    hp.party_name "Customer_Name" , -- Customer Name
    hca.attribute12 FGE_FLAG,
    (SELECT /*+INDEX (oklt OKC_K_LINES_TL_U1) */
    nvl(max((decode(name, 'eSupport','2','Enterprise','1','Standard','1','TERM RTU','0','TERM RTS','0','Notfound'))),0) covName --TERM RTU and TERM RTS added as per Vijaya's suggestion APR302013
    FROM OKC_K_LINES_B oklb1,
    OKC_K_LINES_TL oklt,
    OKC_K_LINES_B oklb2,
    OKC_K_ITEMS oki,
    CSI_item_instances cii
    WHERE
    OKI.JTOT_OBJECT1_CODE = 'OKX_CUSTPROD'
    AND oklb1.id=oklt.id
    AND OKI.OBJECT1_ID1 =cii.instance_id||''
    AND Oklb1.lse_id=2
    AND oklb1.dnz_chr_id=oklb2.dnz_chr_id
    AND oklb2.lse_id=9
    AND oki.CLE_ID=oklb2.id
    AND cii.system_id=csb.system_id
    AND oklt.LANGUAGE=USERENV ('LANG')) COVERAGE_TYPE
    FROM csi_systems_b csb ,
    csi_systems_tl cst ,
    hz_cust_accounts hca,
    hz_parties hp,
    fnd_lookup_values l
    WHERE csb.system_type_code = l.lookup_code (+)
    AND csb.system_id = cst.system_id
    AND hca.cust_account_id =csb.customer_id
    AND hca.party_id= hp.party_id
    AND cst.language = USERENV ('LANG')
    AND l.lookup_type (+) = 'CSI_SYSTEM_TYPE'
    AND l.language (+) = USERENV ('LANG')
    AND NVL (csb.end_date_active, SYSDATE+1) > SYSDATE)
    I have forced an index to avoid Full table scan on OKC_K_LINES_TL and suppressed an index on CSI_item_instances.instance id to make the view query fast.
    So when i do select * from XXX_INFO_VIEWit executes in a decent time,But when I try to do
    select * from XXX_INFO_VIEW where active_supp_flag='Y' and coverage_type='1'
    it takes lot of time.
    Execution plan is same for both queries in terms of cost but with WHERE clause Number of bytes increases.
    Below are the execution plans:
    View query:
    SELECT STATEMENT ALL_ROWS Cost: 7,212 Bytes: 536,237 Cardinality: 3,211                                         
         10 COUNT STOPKEY                                    
              9 NESTED LOOPS                               
                   7 NESTED LOOPS Cost: 1,085 Bytes: 101 Cardinality: 1                          
                        5 NESTED LOOPS Cost: 487 Bytes: 17,043 Cardinality: 299                     
                             2 TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID TABLE CSI.CSI_ITEM_INSTANCES Cost: 22 Bytes: 2,325 Cardinality: 155                
                                  1 INDEX RANGE SCAN INDEX CSI.CSI_ITEM_INSTANCES_N07 Cost: 3 Cardinality: 315           
                             4 TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID TABLE OKC.OKC_K_ITEMS Cost: 3 Bytes: 84 Cardinality: 2                
                                  3 INDEX RANGE SCAN INDEX OKC.OKC_K_ITEMS_N2 Cost: 2 Cardinality: 2           
                        6 INDEX UNIQUE SCAN INDEX (UNIQUE) OKC.OKC_K_LINES_B_U1 Cost: 1 Cardinality: 1                     
                   8 TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID TABLE OKC.OKC_K_LINES_B Cost: 2 Bytes: 44 Cardinality: 1                          
         12 TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID TABLE AR.HZ_CUST_ACCOUNTS Cost: 2 Bytes: 7 Cardinality: 1                                    
              11 INDEX UNIQUE SCAN INDEX (UNIQUE) AR.HZ_CUST_ACCOUNTS_U1 Cost: 1 Cardinality: 1                               
         28 SORT AGGREGATE Bytes: 169 Cardinality: 1                                    
              27 NESTED LOOPS                               
                   25 NESTED LOOPS Cost: 16,549 Bytes: 974,792 Cardinality: 5,768                          
                        23 NESTED LOOPS Cost: 5,070 Bytes: 811,737 Cardinality: 5,757                     
                             20 NESTED LOOPS Cost: 2,180 Bytes: 56,066 Cardinality: 578                
                                  17 NESTED LOOPS Cost: 967 Bytes: 32,118 Cardinality: 606           
                                       14 TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID TABLE CSI.CSI_ITEM_INSTANCES Cost: 22 Bytes: 3,465 Cardinality: 315      
                                            13 INDEX RANGE SCAN INDEX CSI.CSI_ITEM_INSTANCES_N07 Cost: 3 Cardinality: 315
                                       16 TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID TABLE OKC.OKC_K_ITEMS Cost: 3 Bytes: 84 Cardinality: 2      
                                            15 INDEX RANGE SCAN INDEX OKC.OKC_K_ITEMS_N2 Cost: 2 Cardinality: 2
                                  19 TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID TABLE OKC.OKC_K_LINES_B Cost: 2 Bytes: 44 Cardinality: 1           
                                       18 INDEX UNIQUE SCAN INDEX (UNIQUE) OKC.OKC_K_LINES_B_U1 Cost: 1 Cardinality: 1      
                             22 TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID TABLE OKC.OKC_K_LINES_B Cost: 5 Bytes: 440 Cardinality: 10                
                                  21 INDEX RANGE SCAN INDEX OKC.OKC_K_LINES_B_N2 Cost: 2 Cardinality: 9           
                        24 INDEX UNIQUE SCAN INDEX (UNIQUE) OKC.OKC_K_LINES_TL_U1 Cost: 1 Cardinality: 1                     
                   26 TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID TABLE OKC.OKC_K_LINES_TL Cost: 2 Bytes: 28 Cardinality: 1                          
         43 HASH JOIN Cost: 7,212 Bytes: 536,237 Cardinality: 3,211                                    
              41 NESTED LOOPS                               
                   39 NESTED LOOPS Cost: 7,070 Bytes: 485,792 Cardinality: 3,196                          
                        37 HASH JOIN Cost: 676 Bytes: 341,972 Cardinality: 3,196                     
                             32 HASH JOIN RIGHT OUTER Cost: 488 Bytes: 310,012 Cardinality: 3,196                
                                  30 TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID TABLE APPLSYS.FND_LOOKUP_VALUES Cost: 7 Bytes: 544 Cardinality: 17           
                                       29 INDEX RANGE SCAN INDEX (UNIQUE) APPLSYS.FND_LOOKUP_VALUES_U1 Cost: 3 Cardinality: 17      
                                  31 TABLE ACCESS FULL TABLE CSI.CSI_SYSTEMS_B Cost: 481 Bytes: 207,740 Cardinality: 3,196           
                             36 VIEW VIEW AR.index$_join$_013 Cost: 187 Bytes: 408,870 Cardinality: 40,887                
                                  35 HASH JOIN           
                                       33 INDEX FAST FULL SCAN INDEX (UNIQUE) AR.HZ_CUST_ACCOUNTS_U1 Cost: 112 Bytes: 408,870 Cardinality: 40,887      
                                       34 INDEX FAST FULL SCAN INDEX AR.HZ_CUST_ACCOUNTS_N2 Cost: 122 Bytes: 408,870 Cardinality: 40,887      
                        38 INDEX UNIQUE SCAN INDEX (UNIQUE) AR.HZ_PARTIES_U1 Cost: 1 Cardinality: 1                     
                   40 TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID TABLE AR.HZ_PARTIES Cost: 2 Bytes: 45 Cardinality: 1                          
              42 TABLE ACCESS FULL TABLE CSI.CSI_SYSTEMS_TL Cost: 142 Bytes: 958,770 Cardinality: 63,918           
    Execution plan for view query with WHERE clause:
    SELECT STATEMENT ALL_ROWS Cost: 7,212 Bytes: 2,462,837 Cardinality: 3,211                                         
         10 COUNT STOPKEY                                    
              9 NESTED LOOPS                               
                   7 NESTED LOOPS Cost: 1,085 Bytes: 101 Cardinality: 1                          
                        5 NESTED LOOPS Cost: 487 Bytes: 17,043 Cardinality: 299                     
                             2 TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID TABLE CSI.CSI_ITEM_INSTANCES Cost: 22 Bytes: 2,325 Cardinality: 155                
                                  1 INDEX RANGE SCAN INDEX CSI.CSI_ITEM_INSTANCES_N07 Cost: 3 Cardinality: 315           
                             4 TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID TABLE OKC.OKC_K_ITEMS Cost: 3 Bytes: 84 Cardinality: 2                
                                  3 INDEX RANGE SCAN INDEX OKC.OKC_K_ITEMS_N2 Cost: 2 Cardinality: 2           
                        6 INDEX UNIQUE SCAN INDEX (UNIQUE) OKC.OKC_K_LINES_B_U1 Cost: 1 Cardinality: 1                     
                   8 TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID TABLE OKC.OKC_K_LINES_B Cost: 2 Bytes: 44 Cardinality: 1                          
         12 TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID TABLE AR.HZ_CUST_ACCOUNTS Cost: 2 Bytes: 7 Cardinality: 1                                    
              11 INDEX UNIQUE SCAN INDEX (UNIQUE) AR.HZ_CUST_ACCOUNTS_U1 Cost: 1 Cardinality: 1                               
         28 SORT AGGREGATE Bytes: 169 Cardinality: 1                                    
              27 NESTED LOOPS                               
                   25 NESTED LOOPS Cost: 16,549 Bytes: 974,792 Cardinality: 5,768                          
                        23 NESTED LOOPS Cost: 5,070 Bytes: 811,737 Cardinality: 5,757                     
                             20 NESTED LOOPS Cost: 2,180 Bytes: 56,066 Cardinality: 578                
                                  17 NESTED LOOPS Cost: 967 Bytes: 32,118 Cardinality: 606           
                                       14 TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID TABLE CSI.CSI_ITEM_INSTANCES Cost: 22 Bytes: 3,465 Cardinality: 315      
                                            13 INDEX RANGE SCAN INDEX CSI.CSI_ITEM_INSTANCES_N07 Cost: 3 Cardinality: 315
                                       16 TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID TABLE OKC.OKC_K_ITEMS Cost: 3 Bytes: 84 Cardinality: 2      
                                            15 INDEX RANGE SCAN INDEX OKC.OKC_K_ITEMS_N2 Cost: 2 Cardinality: 2
                                  19 TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID TABLE OKC.OKC_K_LINES_B Cost: 2 Bytes: 44 Cardinality: 1           
                                       18 INDEX UNIQUE SCAN INDEX (UNIQUE) OKC.OKC_K_LINES_B_U1 Cost: 1 Cardinality: 1      
                             22 TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID TABLE OKC.OKC_K_LINES_B Cost: 5 Bytes: 440 Cardinality: 10                
                                  21 INDEX RANGE SCAN INDEX OKC.OKC_K_LINES_B_N2 Cost: 2 Cardinality: 9           
                        24 INDEX UNIQUE SCAN INDEX (UNIQUE) OKC.OKC_K_LINES_TL_U1 Cost: 1 Cardinality: 1                     
                   26 TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID TABLE OKC.OKC_K_LINES_TL Cost: 2 Bytes: 28 Cardinality: 1                          
         44 VIEW VIEW APPS.WRS_LICENSE_INFO_V Cost: 7,212 Bytes: 2,462,837 Cardinality: 3,211                                    
              43 HASH JOIN Cost: 7,212 Bytes: 536,237 Cardinality: 3,211                               
                   41 NESTED LOOPS                          
                        39 NESTED LOOPS Cost: 7,070 Bytes: 485,792 Cardinality: 3,196                     
                             37 HASH JOIN Cost: 676 Bytes: 341,972 Cardinality: 3,196                
                                  32 HASH JOIN RIGHT OUTER Cost: 488 Bytes: 310,012 Cardinality: 3,196           
                                       30 TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID TABLE APPLSYS.FND_LOOKUP_VALUES Cost: 7 Bytes: 544 Cardinality: 17      
                                            29 INDEX RANGE SCAN INDEX (UNIQUE) APPLSYS.FND_LOOKUP_VALUES_U1 Cost: 3 Cardinality: 17
                                       31 TABLE ACCESS FULL TABLE CSI.CSI_SYSTEMS_B Cost: 481 Bytes: 207,740 Cardinality: 3,196      
                                  36 VIEW VIEW AR.index$_join$_013 Cost: 187 Bytes: 408,870 Cardinality: 40,887           
                                       35 HASH JOIN      
                                            33 INDEX FAST FULL SCAN INDEX (UNIQUE) AR.HZ_CUST_ACCOUNTS_U1 Cost: 112 Bytes: 408,870 Cardinality: 40,887
                                            34 INDEX FAST FULL SCAN INDEX AR.HZ_CUST_ACCOUNTS_N2 Cost: 122 Bytes: 408,870 Cardinality: 40,887
                             38 INDEX UNIQUE SCAN INDEX (UNIQUE) AR.HZ_PARTIES_U1 Cost: 1 Cardinality: 1                
                        40 TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID TABLE AR.HZ_PARTIES Cost: 2 Bytes: 45 Cardinality: 1                     
                   42 TABLE ACCESS FULL TABLE CSI.CSI_SYSTEMS_TL Cost: 142 Bytes: 958,770 Cardinality: 63,918

    Hi,
    You should always try using primary index fields, if not possible then secondary index fields.
    Even if you cannot do anything from either of the two then try this,
    Use Less distinct fields on the top.
    In your case , you can use bukrs ,gjahr ,werks on the top in the where condition..then followed by less distinct values..
    Even when you use secondary index if you have 4 fields in your sec index and you are using only two fields from the top then the index is useful only upto that two fields provided they are in sequence.

  • IPad air 2 not downloading or updating apps. Is this an issue with apple?

    I Just got the iPad Air 2 Wifi 2 weeks ago. I was able to only update a few apps which was very slow, then nothing all together. Can't download or update my apps. Keeps turning in a circle and not loading. Is this an issue with apple? This problem started with my iPad 2 before I upgraded thinking there might be little or no support for it by now. I cannot be going to iTunes every time I need to download an app. Doesn't make any sense.

    Thanks Brian. Did that already severally. Didn't resolve it. Had to had reset and reset settings before it started working. It's good now. Thanks once more.

  • HT201269 I need to disassociate my phone number with apple texting.  Where do I do this on-line?

    I need to disassociate my phone number with apple texting.  Where do I do this on-line?

    IMESSAGE NOT REMOVED FROM OLD DEVICE
    If you have registered your device in your profile then go to: https://supportprofile.apple.com/MySupportProfile.do and click on you your old device in the profile and "unregister" it there.  If you have not registered it there change your Apple ID password.
    Read http://www.imore.com/text-issues-switching-iphone-android-heres-fix
    iMesssage to old phone
    If you move to another phone and forget to turn off iMessage then read “if you no longer have the device in http://support.apple.com/kb/HT5661  If you still cannot resolve it call Apple http://support.apple.com/kb/HE57
    Read http://m.samsung.com/us/support/SupportOwnersFAQPopup.do?faq_id=FAQ00053450&fm_s eq=62995

  • HT204053 Issue with Apple ID iPhone 4S iOS 6.0.1

    There is an issue, with Apple ID on iPhone 4S Apple ID, by entering wrongly Apple ID at the first time, it can't be changed anymore, or I just can't find where to change it, for proper use of App Store application and update of other apps.

    The change the ID used for purchasing, go to Settings>iCoud & App Stores, tap the ID shown, sign out, then sign back in with the ID you wish to use.

  • My iphone plus is bending, what does Apple offer regarding this issue?   I am trying to get to contact with Apple Customer Care, but not clear to me how to do it beside this channel of communication. I bought the phone from kosovar carrier which is u

    My iphone plus is bending, what does Apple offer regarding this issue?
    I am trying to get to contact with Apple Customer Care, but not clear to me how to do it beside this channel of communication. I bought the phone from kosovar carrier which is under Slovenian ownership. This means that the original warranty comes from Slovenia, bit complicated but still I would like to get an urgent answer how to proceed with this issue, thanks

    Maybe i should have only asked if anyone is aware on apple's policy
    regarding bending. I took the point that this seems not a proper forum to
    pose Q's to apple thanks to both
    On Wednesday, November 5, 2014, Apple Support Communities Updates <

Maybe you are looking for