Issue with billing release to accounting results in a an error.

When using TC VF02 and selecting Release to Accounting option. I get error msg.
Tax statement item missing for tax code Y0.
msg code FF805.
I did check the tax code and the g/l account related to the tax code and it looks ok.
Everything was working fine but after we installed Taxware we began getting these errors.
Any help would be appreciated.

Check the G/L account through transaction code FS00. Enter G/L account no & Company Code in change mode. Go to Control data tab page & check the field Tax category. In Tax category maintain * i.e All Tax Type allowed & save
and
Check Tax Code Y0 in T.Code FTXP.
Regards,
Ajai
Don't forget to reward points if helpful.

Similar Messages

Error mesg. KI248 when billing release to accounting

Hi expert,
Scenario: A sales order is created with internal order (statistical) and during billing release to accounting I hit the beloow error:
Account 87585800 requires an assignment to a CO object
Diagnosis
All given account assignment objects (order, project) are defined as statistical.
System Response
Statistical orders or projects are ignored when FI and CO are reconciled. You must enter a cost center, order, project, or cost object to which the costs are posted for CO postings.
Procedure Enter a cost center, an order, a project, or a cost object that is not statistical. The posting row affected is 0000001004 and the account is 87585800
The cost center has been assigned in OKB9 already, hence am not sure why it didn't trigger the cost center fro OKB9.
Any setting in SD or FI is missing?
Thanks !
Points will be rewarded.

Are receiving revenue here? Do you have Profit Centre or Profitability Segments?
If you need to post to CC read these OSS notes: # 105024, 173071, 28068.
Cheers
Hein

The Java plugin has created a time unfriendly issue with my e-mail account, I can not open or send any e-mail without using this plugin, how can I eliminate this problem without dropping m. firefox?

A few days ago I tried to e-mail a friend, when I started A box came up and it required me to add a plugin..Java. I contacted my e-mail courier and microsoft, they told me that is was a plugin from Mozilla Firefox. Since then I must go through Java to send or open an e-mail... this is NOT to my satisfaction, it takes too long for all of this to open and if it is not cleared , I am dropping Mozilla and going elsewhere. Why has this occurred? Is this a result of the last update? If so can I delete the last update and continue on the other version?
== This happened ==
Every time Firefox opened
== last week

Sorry, I have no idea what you mean by '''"The Java plugin has created a time unfriendly issue with my e-mail account, I can not open or send any e-mail without using this plugin,"'''.
If you think your problem is caused by the Java plugin, you should visit the Java support forum for assistance.
http://forum.java.sun.com/index.jspa
If you could explain what you mean by '''"time unfriendly''' issue with my e-mail account", maybe we'll be able to help you solve that issue.
It might be helpful for us if we knew exactly which web-mail provider you are using. It seems strange to me that viewing or sending web-mail would actually "need" Java for operation, its more likely that some other item on the web page needs Java to run some advertising or other garbage that isn't a necessary part of the web-mail functionality you want to use.

Billing[release to accounting]

dear all,
i am stuck up with a small problem in billing i.e. after assigning the G/L accounts, i wanted to check weather the release of accounts is taking place or not, so i had a look on billing and clicked on the "release to accounting" then i came acroos an error i.e. "for object RF-BELEG 1990, number range interval 01 does not exist FBN1".
after getting this error i tried to give the number range 01 by using the transaction code FBN1, but i didnt succed in doing so.
can some one help me out by telling what i have to do to solve this problem.
Regards,
sushmitha.

hi
Go to FBN1 T-code enter the company code and define the number rang.
First you need to find out for which year 01 number range is not defined then you have to define range for that particular year..
Example
01 2007 1000 2000 and save it
This will solve your issue..
Regards
MBS

Issue with PO release (multi level approval)

Hi,
Need help regarding PO release. I am working with 4 level approval process.
Information:
it is sequential release as I can see in workflow log, a new workflow gets generated for next level only after previous level executes the workitem.
Facing following issue at 2nd Level :
Level 2 releases item and it goes to Level 3, but workitem doesnt disappear from inbox.Once Level 3 releases item, an acceptance mail goes to Level 2. But along with the mail, updated workitem (i.e. showing release by 3rd level) also appears in inbox of Level2. Now two work items appear in Level2 Inbox.
In Workflow Log, this is how its behaving:
WORKFLOW STARTED-->
1st WF appears in WF log.
Level 1 releases WI ->
2nd workflow appears in WF log +
1st workflow with (in process status)
Level 2 releases WI ->
3rd WF appears +
2nd workflow with (in process status) +
1st workflow with (in process status)
Level 3 releases WI ->
3rd WF appears +
2nd workflow with (in process status) +
1st workflow with (in process status)
ISSUE: As soon as Level 3 sends back acceptance to Level 2, updated WI item appears( i.e. with latest release status which in this case is: released by level1, Level2 and Level3) along with the mail.
Level 4 releases WI ->
4th WF appears +
3rd WF appears (in process status) +
2nd workflow with (in process status) +
1st workflow with (STATUS COMPLETED)
ISSUE: As soon as Level 4 sends back acceptance to Level 2, updated WI item appears( i.e. with latest release status which in this case is: released by level1, Level2, Level3 and Level 4) along with the mail.
Result:
PO gets released.
In workflow log 2nd, 3rd and 4th workflow appear with IN PROCESS STATUS. All of them show process stopped at LEVEL2.

Hi Kjetil,
Release strategy is being used. Configuration for release strategy is given as following.
RGroup Rcode   Workflow     Agent
Z6          R1         1                Blank
Z6          R1             1                Blank
Z6          R1             1                Blank
Z6          R1             1                Blank
Release is sequential.
For column 'Agent' mentioning position or User is not really useful because we are getting agents through Z table. Reason is: current org structure supports 1 position with multiple users from same department. In our scenario we need to find initiators department then find relevant approval levels for that departemnt. So I cannot mention any position in 'Agent' Column as release code will be locked against one position and one departetment.
Agents picked through Z table. Table has fields Agent/ UserID , level, department.
Logic to pick agents( Object and method created ):
When workflow starts, it finds department of the initiator.
For that department-> find approval levels available(L1, L2, L3).
For these levels -> Find Agent mentioned for that level.
Onece Agents are found for all levels -> Pass them to WF container.
In task activity, These agents are passed back to the rule and the task comes to know which agent it should go to.
Result : Four workflows start in sequence. When last level releases, only 1st workflow shows COMPLETED status. Rest three hang at level 2. If I see Me29N , release for that item is shown completed. To me it seems triggering of only first workflow is enough for release. Is there any way I can avoid trigerring of other three workflows?
Edited by: User112 User112 on Jan 25, 2008 6:30 AM
Edited by: User112 User112 on Jan 25, 2008 6:31 AM

Invoice generated with out release to accounting, credit memo request and credit memo raised

Dear SD Experts,
I have a situation where the invoice is not released to accounting , but credit memo request and credit memos are being raised...now user would like to release the invoice to accounting (after raising credit note request and credit note), is it possible how do i handle this,
(There is no delivery as this is service business scenario).
Thanks in advance
krishna

Go to 'VFX3' and give the inputs, then select right line and click the FLAG option. It will be manually released to accounting, If not you might find the reason for block.
Revert back with your results.
Anandkumar KS

HELP: SERIOUS ISSUES WITH BILLING

I have had serious issues with BT since joining their service. Without getting into the issues we had with the BT homehub and other things at the start of the contract with them here is what's been happening.
When we joined BT we explained that we wanted a monthly direct debit. Sounds simple enough but apparently not.
I have phoned over 6 times in the last year to change this. It has still not happened. Several times we were told that on the system it said monthly for it to be then taken out quarterly. In July while we were away this happened again. Only as we assumed that as they had informed us it would definitely be on monthly direct debit that it was the money for the whole of the quarter was not there. So when they took the money for a quarterly bill again. We were charged. It has set back other bills as the money had been eaten up by charges for this. As you can imagine we were quite annoyed. This was not our fault and we felt that BT were not capable of holding our account details without taking money they we repeatedly requested not to. I admit we should have kept a closer eye on our bills account but you don't think that a company will repeatedly do this to you.
After phone calls it emerged that they would not say more than a 'sorry' about this.
The saga then continued. I cancelled the quarterly direct debit at the back and have asked BT to send me monthly paper bills. Then last month our phone and internet was cut off.
We rang up and suggested that due to the mix up could they add the money we owed to our monthly bills and we'd pay this off on top of the monthly bill. Despite that the reason we owe this at all is not through any fault of our own but through theirs. The money would have been available had they taken it as repeatedly requested.
We were on the phone for 1hr and 10 mins ( 21st September) to three different people. No, they said must be paid in 10 day. My partner only managed to get money off this in about an hour - the point being we were happy to pay the whole amount over a year and were not allowed. We asked to speak to a manager after 1hr and 10 and were put back to the start of the queue. 16 minutes later the man we spoke to said a manager named Samantha would call us back. No-one did.
On the 22nd of september a rather annoyed me called back and repeatedly requested a manager - sadi would be put though. After 17 minutes the phone went dead.
Called later on same thing phone went dead after requesting a manager at 10 minutes.
Later on called for 28 minutes and told the call centre the issue £20 deducted from amount but said it had to be paid in ten days and a bill would be sent. Was told that the internet would be reconnected that day.
23rd September was hung up on after thre minutes on requesting why the internet had not been connected.
Phoned later. The man that I spoke to said that no action had been put through to reconnect the internet. He would do it and it would be through by 5pm.
My partner phoned at 8pm when the internet still had not been reconnected. It was done the next day.
Today BT phoned to ask if I had the bill ( Not sent) and tell me that the line will be disconnected by the end of the day. i explained that we were in the middle of complaints procedures with them. She looked on the system and said that there were no notes on the account. I asked for a manager and then asked for this managers superior. She put me through to someone that when questioned was not her superior and half way through my explanation of this....you guessed it..... the line went dead.
I am so annoyed that we've been fine with bill paying and as of their mistake we're now in debt to them and feel like we can't sort it out as there is not anyone who will listen or help. Has anyone had similar probelms or does anyone have a number for their English call centre?
Jess

hi Jess,
I am really sorry that you have had so much trouble trying to get this sorted out. I'll get this straightened out.
Could you drop me in an email please to the address in my profile with your BT account and telephone number along with a link back to this thread.
Cheers
Craig
BTCare Community Mod
If we have asked you to email us with your details, please make sure you are logged in to the forum, otherwise you will not be able to see our ‘Contact Us’ link within our profiles.
We are sorry but we are unable to deal with service/account queries via the private message(PM) function so please don't PM your account info, we need to deal with this via our email account :-)”
td-p/30">Ratings star on the left-hand side of the post.
If someone answers your question correctly please let other members know by clicking on ’Mark as Accepted Solution’.

Issue with billing information

It's actually the same problem as here:
- http://forums.adobe.com/message/6104812#6104812
- http://forums.adobe.com/message/5906437
- http://forums.adobe.com/thread/1351796?tstart=0
I have subscribed last month and the first payment was just fine. After one month later I have checked with my bank and the transfer couldn't be completed. I checked with my bank and they said that my transaction history shows no transaction to Adobe but only a handling fee payed on the exact day the transfer should've been complete. So I tried and logged into chat support at least three times, I talked with many employees for two days but still nothing. Best answer I got was to wait 7 workdays from my supposed transaction when the system will try and automatically charge again.
Adobe account management transfer history shows that there's been a payment on April 3rd but my bank history shows no transfer only a payment of 1 euro.
And not only this! After I chat with several chat support personnel, one asks me to put in my card details in a link she has sent me. I put in my details and I get charged 1 euro again. I don't want to be charged 1 euro each and every time I ask someone to help in order for me to pay Adobe thee monthly fees. This is an unnerving and annoying situation!
At account management all my information is put in correctly, my billing address is correct, my card numbers are correct. I don't understand what the problem is. I Premiere CC pro for work and I cannot afford to get this software blocked because of some automatic system that is not working correctly. Please someone help me out ASAP.

I just want to add that the 1$ charge is generally for:
Adobe Store | Online order and payment FAQ
These transactions help Adobe confirm that the credit card used is valid and not reported as lost or stolen. The transaction isn't charged to your account, and once your credit card company verifies it, Adobe removes the charge.
How ever there has been issue being reported for your account .
The last two transaction on April 9th & May 3rd have been successful.

Bill release to accounting

Hi
I have created billing document ,account determination was not possible in order to solve this problem , I clicked the flag button release to accounting from VF02 screen and then it says number range 01 not created FBN1 ,then I tried to create the number range in FBN1 ,it says create number range which does not overlap , i could not get this error when i analysed there is no overlap at all .

Hi Amjad,
The problem is that while in development server there will be a number range '01' assigned. But when the request got transported in the production server, the number range '01' is not found as the number range has to be created at that client manually. It cannot be transported. Now, change the number range in development server and get it transported or maintain a number range with '01' name. Make sure that the number are not overlapping. You can see the overlapping number range at the bottom of the column with blue color.
Reward points, if helpful.
Regards,
Gaurav Grover

Issue with PO Release strategy

Hi experts,
I have problem with Po release strategy in 5 to 10 purchase orders, i have created few purchase orders(2000 Po's) with same document type and company code ..etc and saved, then release strategy has been triggered.
For few purhcase orders release strategy has not been triggered.
If i take 1 po from that few purchase orders(Release strategy has not triggered) as reference and again if i create PO,new purchase order have getting created with release strategy.
Can some body tel how this ican be possible, hope this might be standard syatem behaviour.
Hope i should delete thos e purchase orders and i should create new PO's instead of of old PO's (Without release strategy).
Some experts can share their experiance in this regard.
And how i should proceed further with this issue.??
Thanks

Hi,
You issue in your system has 2000Nou2019s purchase orders with release strategy has been triggered but 5 to 10 purchase orders do have release strategy.
& when you are creating a new PO with reference to old purchase orders (which release strategy has not triggered) and on saving NEW PO created with triggering release strategy.
Cause for above:
PO which release strategy does not trigger because the purchase orders are created before setting release strategy for PO. Those PO triggered release strategy and all are created after setting release strategy for PO.
Action:
Its completely business call for business users to go for options:
Option-- >1# You can use same old PO which release strategy does not triggered, do GR and all other process
Option-- >2# You can create new PO with reference old PO which release strategy does not triggered and upon saving you will have new PO number with release strategy triggered, then release PO & do GR and other related process.
Regards,
Biju K

Issue with Mail and limited account rights

Has anyone else noticed similar problem as I did:
When you don't have permission to create new mailboxes to root of an mail account and then turn on automatic moving to Junk folder, and saving of sent messages on server, it just discards all Spam-marked and sent messages. By deafult at least Mail seems not to be able to handle similar folders created as subfolders of Inbox.
Issue is quite annoying, while account where these limited rights occur, is quite important and there is nothing I can do with the permissions.
I don't know if Mail worked correctly, when using only one account, but when using multiple accounts at least, this problem occurs. Is there any solution available?

All mailboxes under In, Drafts, Sent, Trash and Junk are account mailboxes (with the exception of the On My Mac named mailbox under Trash in the mailboxes drawer) which are created and managed automatically by Mail. You cannot create mailboxes/subfolders under In, Drafts, Sent, Trash or Junk.
The "On My Mac" named Trash mailbox under Trash in the mailboxes drawer is created automatically by Mail when selecting a message for deletion located in a user created "On My Mac" mailbox.
When switching to saving messages on the server for a .Mac or IMAP type account, I believe the existing messages in the locally stored Sent mailbox for the account should be transferred to the server stored mailbox which will be located under the IMAP account named icon in the mailboxes drawer.
Regarding switching Junk Mail from Training to Automatic, what is the setting under the Mailbox Behaviors tab for automatically deleting messages from the account's Junk mailbox?
The only mailboxes you can create are "On My Mac" mailboxes which are stored locally on the hard drive and if you have a .Mac or IMAP type account, you have an additional option for creating a server stored mailbox for the .Mac or IMAP type account which will be located under the .Mac or IMAP account named icon in the mailboxes drawer.

ECC6.0 upgrade issue with IDoc release

Hi experts,
we are in the process of upgrading our ECC environment from 5.0 to 6.0. We have quite a few interfaces which use ORDERS/Invoice Idocs in customised form. In ECC5.0 environment, we had developed a Z segment in the ORDERS Idoc and the segment release was set as 640. Everything worked fine in ECC5.0.
In upgraded environment, SAP has released new version of some segments. one of those is E1EDP01. This segment has 2 new versions in ECC6.0 environment - 007 and 008. This change in the version changes the data in the IDoc and hence interface goes in error at the EDI provider.
We have tried to use 640 as the IDoc segment release in the partner profile of the IDocs. This still gives us an issue because the 007 version of the segment E1EDP01 has release 620 and hence the Idoc picks up 007 version instead of 006 version as desired. When we change the partner profile with Segment release in the IDoc type as 46C, it gives us an issue in the Z segment saying that the IDoc segment is not released in 46C and the Idoc goes in error.
has any one faces such situation in the past? if yes, please throw some light.
Thanks in advance.

Hello,
Iam new to SAP. Thars why i cant understand well to do upgrade,
Then i found out some notes from internet about Upgrade : SAP Note Number 857904 (upgrade from Release 6. To 7.0).
In that notes,
Actually i would like to know about some key words (for example : ASSIGNING, REPLACE, TRANSFER. ) which how to work in the Release 7.0
Always i have some objets in 4.6C.
Ex 01: READ DATASET p_dataset INTO wa_record
Ex 02 : TRANSFER i_crhu TO p_crhd
LOOP AT i_crhd.
*disable controls in crhd
    PERFORM f_disable_crhd.
    TRANSFER i_crhd TO p_crhd.
    IF sy-subrc NE 0.
      MESSAGE a045.        "Error when transfering data to error file
    ENDIF.
ENDLOOP.
CLEAR i_crhd.
CLOSE DATASET p_crhd.
IF sy-subrc NE 0.
    MESSAGE a039.                      "Error at close dataset
ENDIF.
OPEN DATASET v_crhd FOR OUTPUT IN TEXT MODE.
And then i have some FM (ex : WS_UPLOAD , WS_DOWNLOAD)
So I have changed the code for WS_UPLOAD by GUI_UPLOAD
                              and WS_DOWNLOAD by GUI_DOWNLOAD
now my problem is to know about some key word which how to work in ECC6 (for example ASSIGNING, REPLACE, TRANSFER. )
thanks in advance
Rathy

Issue with Asset under construction account

Hi all, I hope you can provide some assistance.
We have a situation where:
Asset created FY09
Internal order created and assigned to settle to the asset. FY09
Goods Received. FY09
Internal order Settled FY09
Asset disabled FY09
Goods Receipt Reversed FY10.
Settlement re-run FY10 as part of normal EOP processing. (Order was not clsd)
Settlement document Reversed when mistake was realised.
The AUC GL account is now out of balance as settlement cannot occur fully on the closed asset. The posting rules for the AUC account mean that you cannot post directly to AUC account.
Any suggestions or a transaction to synchronise the GL account for AUC with another P&L account would be appreciated.
Thanks Doug

Hi there, thanks for your feed back. We didn't want to reactivate the asset due to issues with depreciation etc. So what we did was create a new asset and assign it to the internal order with a new settlement rule. Then re- receipted goods inwards, settled and it all balanced correctly.

Major Issues With Billing, Accounts, Installations...

Hoping someone can help me. Excuse the rant.
I've been a BT customer for the past year. I have recently moved house and was so pleased with the service that I wanted to continue using BT. I phoned BT multiple times in advance of the move, to let them know the date I was leaving the property and the date I was moving in. A simple home move. I was instructed to keep my equipment and use it at the new place. An engineer was scheduled to come and install it. All pretty straight forward.
Here's where it gets messy. Some genius decided that instead of performing a home move on my account, they would cancel it, and open a brand new account and place a brand new order. So now I have 2 accounts, one of which has several hundred pounds of cancellation fees and equipment collection fees on it and another with a brand new 18 month contract. Countless phone calls to BT and I still have 2 accounts and still receive SMS messages about returning my equipment that I was told to keep.
A few days ago I got an email instructing me that my new equipment would be dropped off by signed courier. Obviously since I already had my current equipment I did not want or need this. Again I phoned BT and was told that it was too late to cancel the delivery, but I didn't have to accept and sign for the parcel. I arrived home from work a few days later and was greeted by the unwanted Youview box dumped in my front garden.
Today was the day the engineer was scheduled to visit. I took the afternoon off work to wait for him. His estimated arrival time was between 1-6. By 5 I was getting anxious. 2 more phone calls to BT and I was told to wait it out and everything was fine. Come 6 oclock, no engineer and I phone BT again. This time it appears there was an error in the system and the order was cancelled. This is despite the fact I have been told on multiple occasions over the past 2 weeks that everything was on track for installation. I now need to wait another 5 days for them to ring me back to schedule a new appointment.
So in total:
I've spent over 10 hours on the phone with BT over 15 phone calls.
Be hung up on by customer service staff 3 times.
Received over £300 in completely unjust fees.
Been locked into a brand new 18 month contract.
Missed 3 days of work trying to sort this out.
I'm at my wits end and have no place to turn. What should have been a simple home move has cost me a huge amount of money in time and stress. Unless I can get some immediate resolution from BT, I will shortly be phoning Sky and moving to them. This has hands down been the worst customer service experience of my entire life and the overall incompetence displayed by the BT staff and systems in this case has been staggering.
To top it all off, I'm posting this from my tethered 3G phone because I can't even access my BTOpenzone account.
Solved!
Go to Solution.

Once the Forum Mods have read your post they will post an invite here once you reply to them they will take personal ownership of the problem until resolved.
Do not send them a Personal Message as this is the incorrect contact method and cannot be properly tracked also the mod contacted may not be on shift for sometime and this will delay your help
The forum mods normally reply within 3/5 working days after you have contacted them
They will contact you personally by email or phone
If you want to say thanks for a helpful answer,please click on the Ratings star on the left-hand side If the reply answers your question then please mark as ’Mark as Accepted Solution’

Issue with setting up an account for Apple Discussions

Off and on for 4 or 5 years I have posted questions or responded to them the in PowerBook G4 15" Titanium section. Then a couple of weeks ago I tried to log in and was informed that my Apple ID had been disabled for security reasons. I then created a new Apple ID and password and had no difficulty logging in with that. However, to post in the Apple Discussions I was prompted to create a new account for that purpose. When I filled in the fields, checked the box agreeing to the conditions, and clicked the Submit button, I got no error message, but the "Create New Account" screen reloaded and I still couldn't post. Clicking login just brought up the same screen again. After trying and failing to create a new posting account off and on over a period of a week I finally went to the Seattle Apple Store to see if they could help me. The first employee kindly went through the steps with me three times with the same baffling result. Finally a second employee helped me and was successful on his third try (I thanked him profusely!). However, even he could not identify the problem because no error message ever appeared. Was I trying to use an alias that didn't work for some reason? Does the Other Computer Information field need to be filled in even though it looks optional because it doesn't have an asterisk? Is the secret to get help at an Apple Store? All just FYI.

Thanks, jpfresno. The Apple Store guy also suggested that the alias I wanted might already be in use, but evidently that wasn't the case.
At this point I should clarify that my account issues have been fully resolved. The point of my post is a larger issue--usability of the Create New Account screen. The fact that neither I nor two Apple Store employees could figure out why attempting to create a new account for Apple Discussions repeatedly failed was due to lack of feedback after clicking the Submit button. I would normally expect to see a message like "This alias already in use" or "This field must be filled in" but there were no messages of any sort.

Issue with billing release to accounting results in a an error.

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for