Issue with payment of terms

Hi ,
I am using Basic type ORDERS05 , Message Type ORDERS and for processing FM IDOC_INPUT_ORDERS.
I expect the sales orders to give the same data when the IDOC's are the same and the customer master data is the same, but we have a concern with some orders coming in via EDI for customer sold-to-party is 10000000. When we check for IDOC's 200 (sales order 600 is been created) and for idoc 205 (sales order 650 is been created). Comparing the IDOC's and the sales orders and customer ship-to's, I see no differences except that for the sales order 600, the terms of payment do not show up from the sold-to master, but in order 650, they do.
Please help me.
Thanks.

In debugging found that the PIN code of the customer is different from the IDoc to the SAP ones. So we are getting this issue.

Similar Messages

  • Issues with payment run

    Hi All,
    I am facing with a issue with payment run FPY1. Some of the customers are refunded the amount which is not supposed to be refunded to them. When i check the Contract account level and document level, at both level there is no outgoing payment method set. Is there any other way by which payment run would pick up the amount and refund it back to custmer.
    Kindly share your thoughts.
    Regards,
    Rahul

    Do you have a third level of master data?  In certain FI-CA systems there is a lower level of master data (i.e. contract, insurance object).  A payment method can also be set at this level.

  • Dunning issue with payment block

    Hi Experts,
    I am currently having an issue with Dunning process.
    -> In SAP standard behaviour, if we have a document which has a payment block associated to it,will it be dunned ?
    My issue is that whenever I have a document which has a payment block associated to it, it is being dunned and I dont want this.
    Could you please advise me on how to proceed ?
    Thanks in advance.

    Hi SDNer,
    Thanks for the confirmation.
    But the thing is that I can not put a Dunning Block to it.
    The requirement is that when there is a payment block associated to a document, it should not be dunned.
    Is there any configuration that needs to be done or any Enhancement ?
    Thanks.

  • Issue with payment terms

    Hi all,
    This is an urgent requirement. We need to change the payment terms from 21 NET to 28 NET for two purchase orders at the purchase order level.
    How can this be achieved ?
    Thanks

    Hi,
    We have the tab called Terms beside the shipment tab, in this we can change the payment terms as you like.
    Regards,
    Raju.

  • Lockbox Issue with payment on exact day as Cash Discount Days 1 Due Date

    Dear Gurus
    We are running into an issue in as much as when we receive a payment against our Lockbox on the exact day as the Cash Discount Days 1 due date the system posts this as an on account posting as opposed to applying the cash against the open receivable and posting the difference to the Cash Discount Account.
    E.g. Invoice 10000 Payment term 34 days 2% Net 35. I created the AR invoice today with invoice date and posting date of Oct 9, 2009 and posted the same. Received payment $ 9800 on Lockbox file today Nov 12 using the BAI2 format Lockbox file and found that the system did not even show the invoice # on the Lockbox reports but it recognized the customer based on the MICR # and posted an on account payment. It gave the error" F5 263 Difference too large for Clearing"
    The users have prior complained that this situation arises in F-28 as well where they would have to force the discount instead of the system recognizing the same if cash was being applied on the same date as the Cash discount Days 1 due date.
    Any help in this regards will be geratly appreciated and points awarded.
    Regards
    Satpal Narang

    Hi Satpal,
    Please check the net due date of the document which you are trying to do the payment. As it is critical information to calculate the cash discount.
    I hope this helps.
    Regards
    Ravinagh Boni

  • Issue with Payment Accounting in a 'Cash with Encumbrance' setting.

    Hi Everybody,
    We are upgrading from 11i v 11.5.10.2 to Oracle R12 v 12.1.3 . We have setup Cash with Encumbrance as the subledger accounting ledger in our primary
    ledger. The AAD for payables which is the seeded one is also valid, however to our surprise and dissapointment Create Accounting program does not account any new or old payments alike after upgrade. Any one who has encountered similar problem pls. help. Error message in Create Accouting report output is Error Number 0, Error Message : The subledger journal entry does not balance in the entered currency.  Please verify the entered amounts on the journal entry lines. (This error appears because the system does not create a Cash Clearing Line,hence the JE is unbalanced; which is wrong.)
    It seams the system is behaving like Accrual, checking first if the Invoice for the payment has been accounted or not, which in our case is erroneous because we have setup Cash Basis alongwith encumbrance. please advise.
    Many thanks,
    Arv

    Please see if these docs help.
    R12 "The Subledger Journal Entry Does Not Balance In The Entered Currency" Error While Create Accounting [ID 743441.1]
    Enhancement Request- Purchasing - Accounting [ID 1281525.1]
    Issues Related To R12 Create Accounting Process - List Of Code Fixes [ID 1179643.1]
    R12 - Troubleshooting Accounting Errors [ID 1112504.1]
    R12 Multi-Fund Account Receivables Accrual: Negative Misc Receipts and Receipt Reversal Fail During Accounting: The subledger journal entry does not balance in the entered currency. [ID 762218.1]
    Awt Wrongly Accounted On Cash Basis Accounting [ID 1294376.1]
    Thanks,
    Hussein

  • Issue With Payment Proposal.

    Hello Experts,
    When I am running proposal,I am facing the message " Payment Proposal Could not be carried Out".
    Could you please guide me what it means?
    Thanks,
    Bala

    In order to debug this problem follow these steps:
    1 Key note - If you have other payment runs that you have executed with the same vendors that have not been carried to completion, they must be finished or deleted. you cannot have multiple payment runs in process with the same vendor.
    1. in F110 - Click Edit > Proposal > Delete - The parameters will now be open for you to edit them
    2. On the "Additional Log" tab, make sure you have selected the checkbox " Payment method selection in all cases"
    3. Also on the additional log tab, make sure to enter the range of your vendors you wish to make payments to in the "Accounts Required" field
    4. Now Save the proposal and execute again.
    5. Once it is done running click on the "display proposal log" button. This will give you an explanation of any errors that you may run into.
    If you still cannot figure out the issue let me know
    David

  • Issue with Payment File Creation: F110

    Hi, Everyone.
    Can anyone help me regarding this issue: Payment with identification MR319 with the run date 15.11.2011 does not contain bank account and BIC in the header of the payment file?
    Please advise.
    Thank you in advance for the help.

    Hi, Everyone.
    Another update regarding this issue, in the transaction code F110, we added another program: ZSTR001S at the Printout/data medium.  But whenever we run the payment, there's no payment file being created.  How can I resolve this issue?
    Actually, the solution in order to have bank headers in the file is to add the program ZSTR001S.  Whenever we use the payment method: V, E and S, this program should be visible at the last tab.  But upon adding this at the Printout/data medium (I did this by changing the payment medium of V and S from TRAX_DOMEST to ZSTR001S).  So it became visible at the last tab, but it didn't create any payment file.  What do you think is the reason behind this?
    Thank you.

  • Issue with Payment Run (FPY1)

    Hi Gurus, need you help. I am getting the following message when executing the FPY1. Exceptions        1 Message no. MASSACT101 Diagnosis Counter Exceptions has value        1. For a more precise description of counter Click Here. Counter in Payment Program: Items with Exception Indicator Definition Number of items that cannot be paid and that have been placed in the list of payment exceptions. Each payment exception is classified using the item indicator (data element POKEN_PAY). For each item indicator, you can define whether these exceptions are to be included in the clarification worklist of the payment run.

    Hi Aravind
    Payments which cannot be made through FPY1 are caught in the exceptions. You can view the exception list by checking on the excpetion checkbox. Each exception corresponds to an item indicator (POKEN_PAY). Check for what item indicator, you are getting an exception. The solution is based on the type of exception.
    check the screenshot below
    regards
    debashish

  • Issue with payment run

    hi guru's
    We have one vendor in two company code one is India and one is USA. The bank account number  is different in vendor master data but both accounts in the same country.
    When we make the payment run it has to split to different account based on the currency say for example in this case INR and USD.
    What we are doing at the moment  is whenever we want to make payment to say for example bank account 123456789 we will delete one bank in master data that is 987654321  and make payment. Whenever we want to make payment to 987654321 we will delete 123456789 bank in the master data and make payment.
    Is there any alternative way to split payment according to two bank or 3 banks based on the vendor master data?
    Thanks
    Sunitha

    I don't know a way to split, but to make separate payments you do not need to change the vendor master all the time.  In the vendor master, assign a unique value in the field BnkT for each bank account that you have in the vendor master; this 4-character value is free text (you can enter anything you want as long as you can distinguish).  You then enter this key while entering vendor invoice in SAP (either via FB60 or MIRO).  You will see the field as "Part. Bank" in Payment tab of FB60/MIRO.  The payment program then pays the item via that bank in the vendor master to which this key is assigned.

  • Issue with Vendor Payment Terms

    Hi Gurus,
    We're facing an issue with the Payment Terms of a Vendor in our SRM system.
    In R/3 the Vendor has Payment Term 'A' but when we create a PO for this vendor it appears with Payment Term 'B' (PT from SRM I think)
    The correct PT is 'A' (the one from R/3).
    Does anyone know if the PT are saved in SRM side also and where to check this information??
    I can check in R/3 with code XK03 but from SRM side -in code BP- I can't find PT data for this vendor.
    Regardss.

    Hi,
    Payment term is different in PO when compared to ECC, the following could be anyone of the reasons :
    01. PLease check the payment term value in CONTRACT; if you assigned contract as SOS in PO for ECS
    02. Please check he tpayment term value in BBPMAININT where you can maintain different payment terms manually.
    I hope the above information is very helpful to you.
    Thanks
    Rajesh K

  • Issues with Creative Cloud payment - Problemas al intentar pagar el abono de Creative Cloud

    La primera vez que adquirí el producto se realizó el pago, el segundo mes me llegó una notificación que no se había podido efectuar el pago, así que revise mi tarjeta de crédito y había cupo disponible, sin embargo la fecha automática de cobro ya pasó, y continua en 31/07/2013. Mi abono de Creative Cloud pasó a versión de prueba y ahora solo me quedan unos cuantos días...qué puedo hacer? por qué no está funcionando el pago?
    Gracias
    The first time I bought Creative Cloud there were no issues with my payment method, but second month I recieved some notifications due to a transaction error.  I check my credit card and it has enough funds for paying Creative Cloud. During this period the automatic pay day, changed to 31/07/2013; now I'm trying to make again the payment but there is no way to do it manually, My Creative Cloud subscription is now in test mode, and I just have 3 days until the test mode period ends. How can I try to pay again manually? why is this not working?
    Best Regards

    It may not be possible to manually update your payment details.  Could you please place a new order and get back to us if you have further issues.
    Thanks
    Bev

  • Issue with down payment tax cal and clearing it aganest vendor inv

    HI,
    I have an issue with down payment tax cal.
    1.     I had configured withholding tax and raised down payment, tax has been cal
    2.     In the next step I had raised inv, at this time also tax had been cal
    3.     When I am doing down payment clearing the tax collected at the time of down payment had to be reversed but itu2019s not.
    Can any one give me solution for clearing the tax that cal on down payment.
    Thanking you.

    Dear
    Vendor master has got tax codes both at the time of payment and at the time of invoice.  Hence system is calculating tds on both occassions. 
    Since you pay advance first tds calculated is right.  Now while doing miro remove the tax codes manually and do miro/mir7/fb60.
    If already MIRO/MIR7/FB60 done then reverse the invoice document and clear the tax GL accounts.
    Regards

  • PO report with Payment terms

    Dear All,
    Is there any report i can see all PO details with Payment terms.
    In ME80FN, i see many PO details but no Payment terms.
    Please advice.
    Regards

    Hi,
    try report
    fbl1n
    or in table EKKO
    Regards
    Kailas Ugale

  • Report inculdes PO with Payment term

    Hi ..
    I need to have report includes my purchase orders with payment term column , which transaction can provide that ?
    Thanks
    Yasser

    PO wise payment term u can get in ME2n report..
    Vendor wise from LFM1 or LFA1 table
    Check MKVZ report

Maybe you are looking for