Issue With PO taxes ?????

i have a po of worth 10,000 inr
now i have to apply taxes on the above amount in the follwoing way
70% of the amount @12.5%
30%of the amount @14.5
please help me in this ..
Thanks in Advance...

Hi,
I think you have not analyze yet. Just you asking issue what system is calculating! You must understand business process as based on business process tax process designed in system.
You already confirmed that two condition types JEXS & JEXY is there in TAX procedure...
1st you should understand that why two condition types JEXS & JEXY for CST only for same tax %value.
May two condition types created for CST & one CST for Setoff and another CST for to inventorised.
Now just cross check by creaing new tax codes with two options and see the impact in creating PO and then do GR( try DEV system)
Option-1;;;;; create Tax Code C4 with condition types JEXS & ( also maintain condition record in FV11),see result
Option-::::::: create Tax code C5 with condition types JEXY & ( also maintain condition record in FV11),see result
Regards,
Biju K

Similar Messages

Issues with Withholding tax on advance paid

Dear Experts
Our client deducts TDS on the Advance amount paid and on posting of Invoices from the Vendors. The documents are posted with withholding Tax types configured for this purpose in F-48 and FB60 respectively. Document splitting has been activated in the system with all required configuration.
The problem arises when we try to clear the advance amount against the Invoice along with the balance payment in F-53 if the invoice has more than one expense line posted to different Cost Centers in FB60. The system gives an error message " Balancing field "Profit Center" in line item 004 not filled ". Please follow the example given below for better understanding.
Advance posting:
vendor a/c....dr (Profit center 3)
To bank Clearing (Profit center 3)
To TDS on payment
Invoice:
Expense ....dr (Cost Center1 / profit Center 1)
Expense ....dr (Cost Center 2 / Profit Center 2)
To vendor a/c
To TDS on Invoice
Up to here the document splitting works fine with Profit Centers and segments getting displayed in all line items in GL view. The issue comes when we select both the documents in F-53 and try to pay out the balance amount.
Please note the issue does not crop up if we do not populate the withholding tax code while posting the advance entry. The system automatically posts to the relevant profit centers and segments in F-53. But this is not the business scenario.
It would be really helpful if somebody can throw some light on the above issue.
Thanks in advance.
Edited by: sid_das on Dec 14, 2011 11:26 AM

Resolved at our end.

AP Tax Calculation issue with SINGLE TAX vs TAX GROUP

Hi Gurus,
i need your help on below, please advise!!
i have to calculate ap VAT tax on AP invoice,
(Rounding = nearest, precession=2, tax calcualtion= Include tax)
if i calculate 5% is the tax rate, then the tax amount is 0.47cents,this is in case of single tax calculation.
here my requirement was i need calculate 2 Taxes(TAX A AND TAX B (Rates are 5 AND 5%)
EG:
Invoce Base amount = 10 dollars
in case of single tax = 5/105 * 10 = 0.4761 cents(this is 48cents in apps with rouning nearest and precession 2)
tax mode = Include tax
In case of tax group = Tax A and Tax B = 5 + 5 = 10%, when i calculate this in apps its showing 45cents and 45 cents as tax A and B
why this tax caluclation is different with single tax and tax group.
tax code actual amount tax amount remaining amount
single tax 10 0.4761 10 - 0.48cents = 9.52 cents
tax group 10 45+45=90 cents 9.10 cents
Please Help !!!
Thanks,
Satish

Hi Vineeth,
This is Kathy from BSI Support. I wanted to make sure that you understood that the TF80 Like Reciprocal flag was made available in TF90 for testing purposes only. This was meant as a tool for customers to be able to compare their TF90 results to their TF80 output, to insure a successful upgrade. This funcitonality, however, was never intended to be utilized going forward. There have been significant changes implemented in BSI TaxFactory 9.0 regarding multi-state withholding (also known as reciprocity). There is information available on our website that explains these changes. If you log onto our website, please look under the "Whats New" section for an explanation of reciprocal functionality in BSI TaxFactoryu2122 9.0
If you have specific scenarios that you need help with, please contact us and we will be happy to assist you.
Regards,
BSI Support - Kathy

Upgrade Issue: With-holding TAX Conversion From Classic to Extended.

Dear Friends,
I am working for an Upgrade Project. (From 4.5 to ECC 6.0)
Please help me with steps for convesion of With-holding tax from Classic to Extended.
Your help will be appriciated and Rewarded.
Thank you,
DARSHAN PATEL

Hi,
Converting from classic to Extended withholding tax is possible but be sure once do.
Spro-Sap reference img-Financial accounting-withholding tax-withholding tax change over- MAP TAX CODES AND HEALTH CHECK AND MIGRATION PROGRAMS.
YOU HAVE TO UPDATE YOUR TAX CODES LIKE CENTRAL INVOICE PROPORTIONATELY...
IF IT HELPFUL ASSIGN POINTS, ANY PROBLEM REVERT BACK ME.
REGARDS,
SANKAR

Issues with Service Tax Condition Type.

Hi All,
Where in IMG do you define Region. When I am trying to create a condition record for the Condition Type ZSRT Service Tax under the access sequence, Country Plant Region Material.the system throws the following error SDC SAP System Message Workprocess restarted session terminated. Please advise what needs to be done.
Kind Regards
Atul Keshav

I dont think the issue is because of some missing IMG configuration but because of some kernel patch updation which is basis related. You may have a look at a Note 1375494 - SAP system does not start after applying SAP kernel patch and consult with your Basis team.
thanks
G. Lakshmipathi

Issue with down payment tax cal and clearing it aganest vendor inv

HI,
I have an issue with down payment tax cal.
1.     I had configured withholding tax and raised down payment, tax has been cal
2.     In the next step I had raised inv, at this time also tax had been cal
3.     When I am doing down payment clearing the tax collected at the time of down payment had to be reversed but itu2019s not.
Can any one give me solution for clearing the tax that cal on down payment.
Thanking you.

Dear
Vendor master has got tax codes both at the time of payment and at the time of invoice. Hence system is calculating tds on both occassions.
Since you pay advance first tds calculated is right. Now while doing miro remove the tax codes manually and do miro/mir7/fb60.
If already MIRO/MIR7/FB60 done then reverse the invoice document and clear the tax GL accounts.
Regards

Withholding Tax on Advance paid having issues with Document splitting

Dear Experts
Our client deducts TDS on the Advance amount paid and on posting of Invoices from the Vendors. The documents are posted with withholding Tax types configured for these purpose in F-48 and FB60 respectively. Document splitting has been activated in the system with all required configuration.
The problem arises when we try to clear the advance amount against the Invoice along with the balance payment in F-53 if the invoice has more than one expense line posted to different Cost Centers in FB60. The system gives an error message " Balancing field "Profit Center" in line item 004 not filled ". Please follow the example given below for better understanding.
Advance posting:
vendor a/c....dr (Profit center 3)
To bank Clearing (Profit center 3)
To TDS on payment
Invoice:
Expense ....dr (Cost Center1 / profit Center 1)
Expense ....dr (Cost Center 2 / Profit Center 2)
To vendor a/c
To TDS on Invoice
Up to here the document splitting works fine with Profit Centers and segments getting displayed in all line items in GL view. The issue comes when we select both the documents in F-53 and try to pay out the balance amount.
Please note the issue does not crop up if we do not populate the withholding tax code while posting the advance entry. The system automatically posts to the relevant profit centers and segments in F-53. But this is not the business scenario.
Please let me know if somebody can throw some light on the above issue.
Edited by: sid_das on Dec 12, 2011 5:32 PM

Resolved at our end by tweaking the splitting rule to match the Business requirement.

Issue with Cross-Company code transactions and Extended Withholding tax

Hi Gurus,
I am having an issue with Cross-company code transaction while posting expense with 2 different company codes.
In the 2 company codes, one company code is setup for Withholding tax and other was not set.
While posting in FB50, I am getting the below message and system does not allow to post the invoice.
Company codes have different settings for withholding tax treatment
Message no. F5786
Diagnosis
You are entering a document containing at least one vendor or customer item and which has line items in several company codes. The extended withholding tax treatment has been set to active in one of these company codes, but not in one of the other company codes.
System Response
You cannot enter this kind of document.
Procedure
Enter the transaction in two documents.
For this I tried to test the transaction by activating of extended Withholding tax for both the company codes. Then the invoice is posting correctly now.
The point is if I activate extended withholding tax for the Company code which is not using the setup, will it face any issues in other areas? and also kindly advice whether is this a right way to set up to fix the current problem.
Thanks for the Support and early response will be appreciated.
JBC.

Hi Mamta,
Thanks for the Response. I think you misunderstood my scenario.
For Eg in FB60 with Co code 5065:
I am debiting the Expenses for Co Code 1000(Witholding tax not active) and crediting the Bank Account of Co Code 5065(Withholding tax setup is done for this co code). When I tried to post with these line items I have getting the error.
Posting        GL                   Co Code
Dr          106520(Exp)            1000
Cr          202020(Bank)           5065
For this I tried by activating the Withholding tax for Co code 1000 which is not active before and post it. The system allows me to post the invoice.
I want to know whether is this a right way to solve this issue and will it impact on any other areas by only activating the Withholding tax for a Co code?
Thanks,
Bapu

Issue with document created with a tax code related to a different Company Code

Hello,
we need to clear a document created with the tax code "YY" which is associated to the Company Code Espana even if the vendor of this document belongs to the Country Portugal.
When we try to clear this documents we get the follow error:
Tax code YY for Country Portugal has been deleted or incorrectly changed
The problem is the tax code exists but it is associated to Company Code Espana and not to the Portugal one
In order to cleare this document should we activate the tax code for Portugal, as well?
Thank You

Hello, Are you trying to post entry having Plant in Portugal? Thanks, Deepanshu

Issue With Page Break When Sorting is also applied on group

Hi
I am facing an issue with Page break only when I have sorting applied on the grouping that I have in the template.
The following is the sample XML
<ROWSET>
<ROW>
<GRE>org1</GRE>
<ORGANIZATION>Accounts</ORGANIZATION>
<FULL_NAME>test1,</FULL_NAME>
<ELEMENT_NAME>TEST BONUS</ELEMENT_NAME>
<CLASSIFICATION>Supplemental Earnings</CLASSIFICATION>
<RUN_VALUE>250</RUN_VALUE>
<MONTH_VALUE>500</MONTH_VALUE>
<QUARTER_VALUE>500</QUARTER_VALUE>
<YEAR_VALUE>500</YEAR_VALUE>
</ROW>
<ROW>
<GRE>org1</GRE>
<ORGANIZATION>Finance</ORGANIZATION>
<FULL_NAME>test2</FULL_NAME>
<ELEMENT_NAME>VOLUNTARY AD AND D</ELEMENT_NAME>
<CLASSIFICATION>Voluntary Deductions</CLASSIFICATION>
<RUN_VALUE>5.19</RUN_VALUE>
<MONTH_VALUE>10.38</MONTH_VALUE>
<QUARTER_VALUE>10.38</QUARTER_VALUE>
<YEAR_VALUE>10.38</YEAR_VALUE>
</ROW>
<ROW>
<GRE>org1</GRE>
<ORGANIZATION>Finance</ORGANIZATION>
<FULL_NAME>test3</FULL_NAME>
<ELEMENT_NAME>HMO MEDICAL</ELEMENT_NAME>
<CLASSIFICATION>Pre-Tax Deductions</CLASSIFICATION>
<RUN_VALUE>19.67</RUN_VALUE>
<MONTH_VALUE>39.34</MONTH_VALUE>
<QUARTER_VALUE>39.34</QUARTER_VALUE>
<YEAR_VALUE>39.34</YEAR_VALUE>
</ROW>
<ROW>
<GRE>org1</GRE>
<ORGANIZATION>Finance</ORGANIZATION>
<FULL_NAME>test4</FULL_NAME>
<ELEMENT_NAME>PENSION NR DC</ELEMENT_NAME>
<CLASSIFICATION>Pre-Tax Deductions</CLASSIFICATION>
<RUN_VALUE>0</RUN_VALUE>
<MONTH_VALUE>360</MONTH_VALUE>
<QUARTER_VALUE>360</QUARTER_VALUE>
<YEAR_VALUE>360</YEAR_VALUE>
</ROW>
</ROWSET>
In the template I group the data based on CLASSIFICATION and then sort on the same column CLASSIFICATION. I have a page-break applied for every group.
When I generate the PDF, I am not getting the page-breaks for every group. Instead some of them are displayed in the same page.
But when I remove the sorting that I had in the template on the column CLASSIFICATION, I am getting the output in the desired way but not in a sorted order.
kumar

Hi All,
I am using MS-WORD 2007 and BI Publisher desktop 10.1.3.3.3.
When I use split-by-page-break, splitting is performed for every line .. but not for group of lines.
Can anybody throw some light on this?
FYI...
I am using this code:
?if: position() mod 6= 0?
?split-by-page-break:?
?end if?
(Of course with in tags)
in G_LINES loop.
Can anybody help me out :-(
--Saritha

Error while posting A/R Downpayment Invoice with Excisable Tax Code.

While posting A/R Dowpayment Invoice with Excisable Tax Code error of "Unbalanced Transaction" appears. This error does not occur while posting A/R Downpayment Invoices with Non-Excisable Tax Codes.
Kindly provide a solution for the same.

SAP Note Number: 1179405
Error -5002 when trying to copy a document with Sales BOM
In order to create the delivery via the DI, you need to set the oDoc.Lines.BaseLine value to the LineNum value from the RDR1 table (in the above example you should enter the value 2).
we set oDoc.Lines.BaseLine=0 before starting the lines loop. This has resolved the issue.
This note was really helpful and it was found in another query.
You can also refer to this. https://forums.sdn.sap.com/click.jspa?searchID=19070513&messageID=6178079
Thanks.
Edited by: Sadanand Manda on Nov 24, 2008 12:16 PM

Issue with Asset Retirement without Revenue (ABAVN)

Hi Experts, hope that you are able to help shed some light on an issue with retirement without revenue (Scrapping).
We have an asset capitalised in FY 2007 with two depreciation areas 01 - Book & 15 Tax. There have then been settlements made to the asset from WSB Elements using transaction type 331 & 336. These were through FY 2008 and depreciation was calculated correctly throughout this time.
The issue was then in FY 2009 when there have been negative settlements posted (adjustments) to the asset and then the asset was retired. The retirement was posted but the values aren't what was expected. It was my belief that the posting should be credit APC, debit accumulated depreciation and then posting to a loss account defined in AO86.
Period Control are the same for retirement '01' for both the straight-line method in book depreciation and the declining balance method in the tax depreciation area .
The posting has been pretty much as expected in the book depreciation area - but in the tax depreciation area where the depreciation key is declining balance there is a reported gain from the retirement.
The report for depreciation are 01 - book shows retirement $1m split between $1.1m in PY and -$0.1m in Current Year.
The issue is that in the tax depreciation area the amount posted for retirement is $1.0 but depreciation posted is $1.125 and -$0.5 with a respective Gain for both prior year (PY) and current year... why has this happened ???
Thanks in advance
Chris
Retirement posting:
PK 75 CR APC value                 TType 200
PK 70 DR Acc. Dep'n CY          TType 250
PK 70 DR Amortisation              TType 290

Thanks Tarun,
I've solved checking the limitation in Customizing. There was a limitation for the Retirement: this was activated only for first Depreciation Area, so for the other ones no retirement will be calculated and net book value was always not equal to zero.
Regards,
Jody

With holding tax amount exceeds the cutomer/vendor line item amount 001

Hi Guru's,
I have an issue, is there any impact to change the withholding tax base amount 20% instead of 10%.When I change the base amount to 20% and post a document system return error message
"With holding tax amount exceeds the cutomer/vendor line item amount 001".Guide me on this issue.
And tell me the impact of previous open item documents.
Regards
Maruthi.

Thanks for all,
MY problem solved.
Regards
Maruthi

Service SRM PO fail to replicate to SAP with error"Tax code Mand. for ERS"

HI
We are facing issue for posting Serviice PO with vendor enabled with ERS functionality.
Service purchase orders with ERS flag and with complete tax detail fail to replicate to MM PO. Error found on XML on ECC interface : "Enter Tax code in case of Evaluated receipt settlement".
We have compelete tax details on the XML which is not recognized. When we manually feed the details in dubug it allows to post the document.
PO is created with account assigned service item.
Have any one come across simialr situation.
Regards
Prashanth K Saralaya

Hi Prashanth,
Do you have tax code maintained in SRM PO. SRM PO is pushed to ERP using RFC Calls and not XML(in standard scenarios). I am wondering why XML is being checked in debug mode by you for a SRM PO to make it to ERP.
May I have the background of your requirement..
Regards
Virender Singh

Error: there are non exicisable item with cenvat tax code

I am getting an error message there are non exicisable item with cenvat tax code while trying to add po for pick and pack from sales order. I request all of you to help me with it.
I have already checked if the item and ware house is exicisable in the check box of the master data.
Best regards,
Sandesh.Sreyamsh

Thanks mahendra and rahul,
Unfortunately my issue is not solved yet, the tax is not manually created it was created by sap during new company creation. I checked by adding other tax type in sales order but every time when I try to create sales bom it gives the above error.
@ Rahul the tax is under cenvat type and the Items has been added under exercise transaction. here is what im trying to do
I created a sales order for 4 of my items.
Then i try to create po for two of my as pick and pack items by checking Purchase orders indicator under logistics tab of sales order.
At this point i am getting the above said error.
All the items i am trying to add is exisable and tax is also of cenvat type.
Please help me out of this as im stuch very badly in this issue.
Regards,
Sandesh.Sreyamsh

Issue With PO taxes ?????

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for