Issue with purchase order item

Hi Guys,
When entering or changing an order in SAP via VA01/VA02, the system will not allow the entry of leading zeros in the Purchase Order Item (VBAP_POSEX) field which is defined as character 6. Leading zeros can be entered in the Customer Material (VBAP_KDMAT) which is also defined as character. Some customer PO Item numbers begin with leading zeros and they want to see them on output. Does SAP have an OSS note for this?  any helpful suggestion would be well appreciated.
Thanks!
Edited by: MK18774 on Oct 5, 2009 9:57 PM

there is a include FV45PF0V_VBAP-POSEX_PRUEFEN
that checks PO number and item number .... with your own EKPO (purchase order item) table.
and this include has as well the routines to convert the number: CONVERSION_EXIT_ALPHA_INPUT

Similar Messages

  • Issue at Purchase order Item Text Transferring

    Hello,
    I have an issue with Purchase order Item text transferring from SAP R/3 to EDI.
    Here I am using Function Module - IDOC_OUTPUT_ORDERS.
    within the function module i have user exit to populate this.
    User Exit Name : EXIT_SAPLEINM_002
    Include name : ZXM06U02
    I need to populate data manually ( Hardcode ) for E1EDPT1 is 'LINK'.
                                                     and    E1EDPT2 is " some text".
    When I write the code at user exit ,it is populating so many time Link Field.
    However i need to get only one time for each Item of Purchase order.
    and also I have one more question as per SAP Standard Purchase order each item has :
    1. Item text
    2. Info record PO Text
    3. Material PO Text
    4. Delivery Text
    5. Info Record Note
    when Create PO and it created Idoc ,even when i fill all the text ,when i see data at WE02 ,it has only few text not all.
    Please give me advice ,how should i follow.
    Thanks
    Seshu
    Issue at Purchase order Item Text Transferring

    Hi,
    Do this check before adding the text..
    IF INT_EDIDD-SEGNAM = 'E1EDPT1'.
    add the text..
    ENDIF.
    Thanks,
    Naren

  • Issues with Purchase order change documents

    Hi Gurus,
    I have some peculiar issues with Purchase order. The PO line item has deletion indicator set but I can't find who set the deletion indicator. The PO change documents doesn't show anything related to deletion indicator.
    Please help to fix the Issue.
    Regards,
    Senthil

    Hi
    Check it in Tcode SE16
    Table Name CDHDR and CDPOS
    Regards,
    Raman

  • Issue with Purchase Order in SRM.

    Hi All,
    Issue:
    Requestor name and goods recipient name are empty in the Partner Overview of a Purchase Order. The reason is the requestor who has raised the PO has left the company and not having BP as user number in Portal system any more.These PO's are almost old and closed, but the procurement team needs to trace the trade for the aim of audit, or new conditioning, etc.
    ==========================================================================
    Here my question is how to retain user name there as hardcord so that we can contact to successor.Is it possible through BADI's / BAPI's ?
    As a workaround we asked user to use ME23N tcode(backend).
    Please suggests!!
    Regards,
    Ravi Vardhan

    Hi Ravi,
    Do you have BP guid (which is associated with the user who left the organization) in the PO document. Please check the bbp_pd for this
    purchase order number check the field crmd_partner-partner_no,  we have
    to change this field with the existing business partner. We can't change the document which has invalid requestor / recipient. We have to update these POs with correct requestor / recipient business partner number via a z report.
    Hope this information will help you!!!
    Regards,
    Amudha

  • Issue with Purchase Order  ZPRM & delivery ZPRE

    We are getting the same general error for 2 message types:
    1.      PO 600127603 an automatic Output message was generated u201CZPRMu201D  returning the error u201CZPR_PO_MARCu201D
    a.     Transaction Details ME22N - MESSAGES
    2.     Delivery 83036841 an automatic Header Output message was generated u201CZPREu201D returning the error u201CZPR_GI_MARCu201D
    a.     Transaction Details VL02N u2013Extras > Delivery Output> Header
    For both issues i was getting Error Message "No Recipient found for Message Type u201CZPR_PO_MARC" in the ALE Model.
    And i had added this Message type  in th Oubound Parameters in WE21 and also created Model view added Message Type to it  using BD64.
    But still i am facing any issue.
    Please help me on this.

    Hi,
    Have you distributed your model?
    If not bd64->edit->model view->distribute
    Regards
    Praveen

  • Issue with Purchase Order

    When user is creating/changing the PO it is throwing the Error Message  "AM010 Address doen't exist T001W 6400 50216816 10"  when he clicks on the tabsrip DELIVERY ADDRESS in production but not in Quality.
    For that one sap suggested a note called : 91001 which is having the correction programm ZCORADDR.
    But what the problem is before implementing the note we need the justifiaction on that note.
    The ossnote 91001 is having the above program which is dealing with the tables EKKO/EKPO/EBAN and FM : ADDR_GET.But as per my understanding the FM :ADDR_GET is fetching the data from SADR or ADRC.
    can you the link between the tables EKKO/EKPO and ADRC and flow of the data.
    i have checked the tables EKKO/EKPO in Q and P we dont have the data for the field ADRNR.
    I have checked the tableT001W in Q and P.
    The plant is maintained in OX10.
    Please find the above findings and suggest the solution

    Hi,
    Generally address field 'adrnr' picks from either at plant level or PO level
    Plant level - t001w-adrnr
    PO level   -  from EKPO table, needs to pick 'adrnr' for related 'ebeln' and then go to table 'adrc' to check for 'adrnr'
    Through func.module 'addr_get', pass value to parameter 'address_selection' to receive detailed address from receiving parameter 'address_value'
    Now we can have complete address info at 'address_value' table parameter
    Best Regards,
    Suren

  • MCEKPO-MENGE issue through 2LIS_02_ITM for Statistical Purchase Order Items

    Hello Everyone,
    I have come across this strange scenario where a given Purchase Order Item in the Source system - SAP R/3 has been changed in the following sequence,
    1. First the PO Item was marked as a Deleted PO - LOEKZ = L which set the STAPO = X (Statistical) and
    2. The Deletion Indicator was removed for the PO Item which means LOEKZ now is not having "L" and the STAPO also has been removed.
    Due to the above scenario, now the Order Quantity in the SAP BW system has 0 as the value whereas the Quantity in the SAP R/3 System shows up as 1.
    I was curious to know if there are any OSS Notes or processes in place to avoid this from happening. As I searched the forum and service place for the OSS notes related to this issue and could not find anything related.
    The Order Quantity in our system is extracted from 2LIS_02_ITM (MCEKPO-MENGE) field.
    Thanks in advance for the help.
    Dharma.

    hi Dharma..
    Did you find a solution for this post?
    I Have similar issue....
        I Have an issue (I think is issue)...with extractor 2LIS_02_ITM about reversal or deleted indicator….
    Some PO are created on R/3 and mark for deleted some line items… I try or I hope  received a “R” indicator…. But I didn´t receive the indicator…..
         I only receive “X” on this field.. (delete indicator). or in other examples  blank on this field
        What’s the difference between “X” , “R” and blank indicator?... when is posible receive X, R or blank value??
        I was thinking that when on R/3 some lines of PO orders were deleted.. I receive "R" indicator when I extract to  BW (on the PSA)... but I didn't...
       If you know how work this kind of cases or examples, please explain me more.. or let me know where can I find more information please.
        I will assign points to all the answer.
       Thank you
    Alice

  • Expand Table Control with Fields for Purchase Order Item Overview

    Hi Gurus.
    Hereu2019s something easy for you, I hope/ think. We just want to additionally show the field u201CMFRPNu201D in the purchase order item overview. See structure MEPO1211 for the table control.
    How can we do this? Is it possible without a modification? Is there anything to pay attention to?
    Lot's of questions, because we donu2019t find any complete solutions yet. It seems there are no official SAP suggestions for this issue.
    Thanks in advance!
    Regards
    Patric

    Is there no one out there who can answer my question?

  • How to link asset with purchase order and PO Item.

    Hello,
           I have to generate a report which contains columns
    Asset No , po no(ebeln) ,PO Item(ebelp),Material no etc
    My query is how to link asset with purchase order and      PO Item.
    I am selecting asset and po no. from anla  but how to get
    po item no(ebelp)?
    po line item is important in this report because every line item has differrent asset and material no.
    i tried to match asset no in mseg table but i am not getting asset no in mseg .
    how should i proceed ?

    Thanks Thomas & Srimanta for the quick response.
    When I checked EKKN table by entering PO there is no asset no. in anln1 field.
    Also I would like to add that, In me23n for a PO, account assignment category we are entering 'F' for internal order settlement.
    Where can i find the link between asset and po no(ebeln) and po item(ebelp)?
    Regards,
    Rachel
    Edited by: Rachel on Aug 11, 2008 7:23 AM

  • Purchase Order Items open vs ME2M discrepancy

    First posting so if this is not the right section please move this topic.  Was the closest I could come to correct forum placement.
    Hello all,  I am in the process of setting up BPM to monitor u201CN* of Purchase Order Items openu201D from various plant locations and I am noticing the number BPM gives is different than what the system you give if I used ME2M.
    For example:  I am setting up BPM to monitor Number of Purchase Order Items Open for plant location 2102.  The set up is scarce and I only have a few fields filled out in the set-up:
    -Document Type u2013 Single Value u2013 NB, UB, FO, ZPC, ZGR
    -Plant (Item) u2013 2102
    -Doc. Category u2013 F (Purchase Order)
    -All of fields are left blank
    When this runs I will get an example of 1487 (it changes on an hourly basis so I canu2019t give a static value).
    When I try to verify this number using ME2M I get a value of 1237.  A difference of 250.
    The configuration I am using for ME2M is as follows:
    -Plant u2013 2102
    -Scope of List u2013 ALLES
    -Selection Parameters u2013 WE101
    -Document Type - NB, UB, FO, ZPC, ZGR
    -All other fields at left blank
    Any reason for this discrepancy?  The closest I can guess is SAP is pulling in some additional information OR my configuration is incorrect.  Anybody run into this issue that has some tips?
    Thank you
    -nic

    I know that ME2M has nothing to due to with BPM.
    I am confused as to why when I set up BPM, in Solution Manager, to monitor Purchase Orders that are open I am getting a different number than when I use the transaction ME2M in SAP ECC.
    For example:
    When the process runs in Solution Manager I get back 1425 open POs
    When I go into SAP ECC and use the transaction ME2M it will only pull up 1175 open POs
    Somewhere along the lines I am missing or adding 250 POs.  The current setup (listed above; not sure if BPM is configured the same for everyone) is listed above.
    I have tried various set-up options in both BPM Solution Manager and SAP ECC (ME2M) but can't seem to find where these additional numbers are coming from.
    Thank you
    -nic

  • In MR11 - u201CNo (suitable) purchase order/item found     u201C.

    Hi Friends,
    We are having issue with MR11 in 4.6 B. While doing MR11 for a PO where Delivery costs have not been balanced, we are getting message u201CNo (suitable) purchase order/item found     u201C.
    In the research, we found that in 4.6 B, MR11 is using program SAPMM08K, where as in ECC 6.00, it is using program SAPRCKM_MR11.
    Initial fetch from PO history table :
    4.6 B -> In 4.6 B we are using EKBI view (Join via EKKO / EKPO / EKBE for MR11) to fetch the PO history table. (It is not considering EKBZ table for delivery cost records)
    Program is checking the Quantity of EKBI, if there is no difference in quantity then it is coming out of loop and showing message
    No (suitable) purchase order/item found
        Message no. M8 401
    3CAUSE&
        No purchase order exists which corresponds to your entry for a quantity
        difference posting.
    ECC 6 -> In ECC 6.00 we are using view V_CKMLGRIR (DB View: Selection for MR11 Clearing GR/IR Clearing Account Table u2013 EKKO, EKPO and EKBE)
    Here also program is checking the Quantity in the View, if there is no difference in quantity then it is going for another fetch (which is missing in 4.6 B).
    In the another fetch, it is checking View V_CKMLGRIR_FR (DB View: Selection for MR11 Clearing Freight Clearing Accnt Table u2013 EKKO, EKPO and EKBZ)
    I've searched sap notes but couldn't find much help. I've tried different search criteria but no luck. Could anyone able to help me?
    Thanks,
    Ramesh S

    HI
    MR11 will show only the blocked invoices due to quantity/price difference.
    First of all please check your invoice (MIRO of your required PO) that it is blocked for invoice verification or not .(Please note block for payment is not relevant for MR11).
    Further please check if you have mainatined any tolerance in GRN (MIGO) for under or over delivery , so it is not escaping the PO due to under/over tolerance limit.
    Cheers
    Mukta

  • Urgent : Issue with deleting Line Item in ME22N

    Hi all,
    I have an issue with deleting line item in ME22N for some Purchase Orders.
    When I try to delete the line item, a warning message comes up saying that " Quantity invoiced or delivered is less than the quantity ordered". And I am unable to proceed further and save the PO. Could anyone let me know as why this is happening?
    Thanks in advance.
    Regards,
    Adapala.

    Hi
    there is no need of group key.
    if any of these 3 are done, payment will be done in total.
    1.In setup all company codes for payment transactions , DESELECT seperate payment per business area check box
    2.In setup paying company codes for payment transactions , DESELECT seperate payment for each reference check box.
    3.In the Vendor Master got to payment transactions tab and below the payment method , there will be individual payment checkbox. DESELECT that check box.
    try again with first two with DESELECT options , i will check out with DME.
    Cheers

  • Purchase order item 00001 still contains faulty ac count assignments

    Hello guys,
    I have an issue with PO not being processed to SAP: it get on status, held, error in process. In SRM portal I get the message "Purchase order item 00001 still contains faulty ac count assignments".
    I have checked the Purchase Order status in SAP SRM using the transaction BBP_PD and I got the status I1132 "Transfer failed (E.Sys.)".
    Is there a way to reprocess the order and release the status to "Ordered"?
    Please describe me the process in detail
    Thank you,
    Sarah

    Hi,
    First please check whether the Account assignment is allowed in the backend.
    1.     Copy the GL account from the SC --> Go to backend system --> Go to FS03 transaction --> Paste the GL account and respective company code --> Go to tab Create/bank/interst --> Click on Field status group --> Check for Addtional account assignments --> Check whether this GL account is allowed to post for the account assignment enter in the Shopping cart.
    If not allowed. Change the GL account in the SC and Retransfer the SC.
    You can resubmit or retransfer using following FM or Report -
    1.     BBP_PD_SC_RESUBMIT --> FM
    2.     This is the new report BBP_SC_AUTO_RETRANSFER to change the status from
    3.      Go to the portal --> SC monitoring --> Click on Create Follow on document or RZ20
    Thanks.
    From RBEI,
    Snehal

  • MR11- Purchase order items not balanced. Material price will be negative

    Hi all,
    Currently i have PO with stock items with document date on Aug with qty of 5 and good receipt  with qty of 5 on the same month as well. After that when it performs MR11- account maintenance i encounter the error above.
    It has performed good issue to production and now left 5 qty.
    Initially i thought because the stock value cannot absorb the material price, but i have done the same simulation on QAS. it seem to working fine.
    Can you assist me on this.

    Hi Jurgen,
    Actually i have found the Snote related to this issue. It has solved the issue for me.
    To clear the purchase order items, proceed as follows:
    1. Execute transaction MR11 "Maintain GR/IR Clearing Account" with the
    relevant selection parameters. Select all proposed account maintenance
    document items whose cumulated difference value of a material is less
    than the current stock value (SALK3) of the same material.
    Post this account maintenance document.
    2. Execute transaction MR11 "Maintain GR/IR Clearing Account" with the
    above selection parameters again. Select a proposed account
    maintenance document item whose difference value is greater than the
    current stock value (SALK3) of the same material. Post this
    account maintenance document. Post the portion of the current stock
    value to the stock account (BSX). The rest is distributed to the price
    difference account (PRD). Now the current stock value (SALK3) of the
    material is 0.
    3. Execute transaction MR11 "Maintain GR/IR Clearing Account" with the
    above selection parameters again. Now you can post all remaining
    proposed account maintenance document items for this material.
    Note 1305016 corrects the symptom described.
    SNote 1305016 - MR11_Negative stock value for value-only article II
    SNote 983769 - MR11_CKMLGRIR 023 for GR-based IV & matl moving avg. price
    Thank again for your assistant.

  • Create additional field in sales order item and copy to purchase order item

    Dear SAP Gurus,
    I am hoping that someone could help me by providing me with how to implement the following 2 requirements in the SD order and in the purchase order.
    1. I am wanting to add a custom field to the SD sales order item copying a value from the vendor customer master.
    2. I then want to add a custom field to the purchase order item and copy the value from my custom field in 1. to this new custom field..
    Can you please advise how I would go about implementing the above requirements?  I am assuming that there are exits to allow me to implement these 2 requirements.
    Many thanks
    Henry

    Hi,
    For the first requirement you can use the USEREXIT_MOVE_FIELD_TO_VBAP in report MV45AFZZ.
    For the second, as I think that you will create a RFQ you can try to use the enhancement MEREQ001.
    Regards,
    Eduardo

Maybe you are looking for

  • Create csv file for data in tables

    Hi All, I need to "export" data for about 60 tables in one of my databases to a csv file format using a "|" as a separator. I know I can do this using a query like: select col1 || '|' || col2 || '|' || col3 from table; Some of my tables have more tha

  • Order should be copied with reference to other order

    Hi Friends, We have two order types zext and zexm. Zext should be always created with reference to zexm. we done this through copy controls.Both are sales orders.Now our requirement is suppose we done a sales order 100001000 of type zexm. untill it i

  • Any solution to call Bridge JS functions from AppleScript

    I´ve got AppleScript which is controlling Extensis Portfolio 8 and InDesign CS2. I´d like to call Bridge and change the color of the label of active document . Does anyone know any method to do this? Portfolio does not support JS and it seems to me a

  • Appletviewer: Yes - Browser: No

    Please help, I'm just starting out with Java but can't even manage to say "Hello World". Which reminds me, manners! Hello World (not quite as impressive as I hoped for but it will do for now), From the appletviewer, it works fine but when I use the s

  • Copy & paste embeded object to file system

    Cross-post at: http://stackoverflow.com/questions/27685791/copy-paste-embeded-object-to-file-system Background: I wrote a large piece of VBA code in an Excel workbook to help handle a lot of repeating jobs. I found it is painful to maintain and modif