Issue with Standard price

The issue is coming when we are using currency as TND and HUF
TND Currency has 3 decimal points
HUF Currency has NO decimal points.
1) Issue with TND Currency: - Price value shifting left side by one
decimal
Sample Scenario for TND:
When a cart is getting created with quantity 100 EA and price per
unit is 120.000 TND and when the user clicks on "Check",
The price per unit is shifted to left side and the value is
getting changed to 12.000 TND.
And this impact is effecting on the Total Value also.
12.000 TND * 100 EA = 1200.000 TND (But it should be 12000.000
TND).
This cart is approved with incorrect value and is available in
the carryout sourcing.
The price (Custom Price) of the shopping cart in the work list
in sourcing is 12.000 TND (same as the changed value when the cart was
created).
When this cart is added to the buyer's work area, AGAIN standard
SAP price field is getting changed from 12.000 TND to 1.200 TND.
Changes happen like this 120.000 TND -> 12.000 TND -> 1.200 TND.
2) Issue with HUF Currency: - 2 zeros adding into right side.
Sample Scenario for HUF:
When a cart is getting created with quantity 100 EA and price per
unit is 120 HUF and when the user clicks on "Check",
The price per unit getting updated as 12000 HUF.(Please note that
2 zeros are added in right side and there is no decimal point for this
currency)
And this impact is effecting on the Total Value also .
12000* 100 EA = 1200000 (But it should be 120 * 100 EA = 12000)
This cart is approved and is available in carryout sourcing.
The price (Custom Price) of the shopping cart in the work list
in sourcing is 12000 (same as the changed value when the cart was
created).
When this cart is added to the buyer's work area, again
standard SAP price field is getting changed from 12000 to 1200000 (Its
Already changed once
from 120 to 12000 while creating the shopping cart ) in
buyer's sourcing work area
Changes happen like this 120 HUF -> 12000 HUF -> 1200000 HUF.
In case anybody has worked on a similar scenario before, please provide some pointers in this area.
Regards,
Bharathi

Hi. Have a look for applicable OSS notes for function module CONVERT_TO_LOCAL_CURRENCY.
We have had numerous issues with currencies, and it is normally this function that causes the problems.
Regards,
Dave.

Similar Messages

  • KMAT with standard price that can be purchased or assembled

    Hello Experts!
    I have a question and doubt regarding configurable (KMAT) with standard price.
    We have the material XXX that is a KMAT/configurable that is assembled. The MBSS has the corresponding amount of assembly - it is OK.
    The same material XXX can be also configurable and purchased from other external supplier. So, it is generated the purchase order. After MIGO and MIRO, the amount posted at MBBS is 0,01 (the amount recorded at material master data) instead the amount of purchasing.
    Is it possible having the purchasing amount at MBBS when we buy the KMAT like we have when the KMAT is assembled?
    My best regards!
    Cheers@!

    Currently the only tool that provides the ability to edit a PDF (i.e, make small text changes, watermark, etc) is Acrobat Std. or Pro. You can check out a 30-day trial copy of this at:
    https://www.adobe.com/cfusion/tdrc/index.cfm?product=acrobat_pro&loc=en

  • Issue with Standard Cost estimates / Material Ledger

    Background:
    We have been using SAP for the last 5 years with Material Ledger active. Due to a number of reasons, we have not revised its standard cost estimates from 2001 till now. This means that at month end, we do not mark and release prices as recommended, nor do we mark prices and use dynamic release.
    What Happened:
    A new material called PFSW3 was made. This is a FERT. Before production
    could start my team released the standard cost estimate for this material. Production was now able to proceed without problem. Then, when the time came to sell the material (VF02), SAP again raised the error 'cost estimate not found'. On checking the standard price in MM03, we discovered that the future cost estimate was missing. So we created and marked a new cost estimate in the middle of February 2007.
    Problem:
    When the first sale took place, SAP released the marked cost estimate and posted a Price Change document to adjust for the new standard cost. I understand this was due to dynamic release. Now, when month end came, the system settled all the production orders of material PFSW3 but did not do multi level costing on it.
    Internal Investigation:
    My team has determined that the material PFSW3 has price determination 2 set by mistake. All our other production materials (HALB and FERT) are
    set to price determination 3 in the material master (accounting view).
    Questions:
    To sum this situation up,
    we need to know why the material PFSW3 was not marked closed in its period status (CKM3) at the time of closing through CKMLCP?
    What are the implications of not closing this material in Feb 2007 (current period status is showing 'Quantities and values entered')?
    How can we close this material this month?
    The future cost estimate is again missing for PFSW3 in March 2007 and I
    fear we are going to face more problems as this material is sold to customers.
    Please respond this is an urgent issue.

    Dear Shumyl,
    Please, have a look at Note 645083 - Material period status set to "Closing Entry Completed" that might help to closing your material in previous period.
    Hope it will be useful.
    Regards,
    Flaviano.

  • Price valuation with standard price in case of external procurement

    Dear All,
    I have the following scenario with my client.
    All the materials will be valuated with price control S, whether procurement type is E or F. We don't have any problem if procurement type is E. But where as if procurement type is F and price control indicator is S, the system calculating the moving average price and as well as standard price is also updating for some materials. For some materials there are not moving average prices.
    1. Can any one tell me when SAP calculates both moving average price and standard price? is there any setting to be done.(procurement type F and price control S)
    2. there are differences between moving average price and standard price, ofcourse there may be a difference, but in some cases the difference is more and higher than the standard price, this may cause financial loss to the company. How can solve this.
    full marks will be awarded.
    thanks & regards,
    Ramesh Balivada

    Hi
    Moving average is updated for External purchases although price control is standard price in all cases where there are movements in materials i.e., when they are purchases...
    Check for the materials where there are no updation of moving average and externally procured materials, there might not be any purchases..
    There would be no losses as even though it is calculating mov avg price, the stock, consumption is calculated with std price only.
    Check both the cases where there are std prices and check for cases where there are both prices getting updated.
    Regards,
    Suraj

  • Issue with Std price & Overheads at the time of goods issue

    Hi Experts,
    Please help me on below concern.
    system is taking the std price at the time of goods issue as we marked price control "S" for all materials to track the PPV seperately. So once we run the std costing system is calculating the std cost= direct material+overheads and updating the same in std price in accounting 1 tab.
       But as per our requirement at the time of goods issue system has to take only direct material not overheads,  also one more problem is at the time of actual overheads calculation in the period end , system is calculating overheads on total of direct material+overheads instead of direct material only.
      So please suggest how to config the system to meet my client's requirement.
    Thanks&Regards,
    Spandana.

    Hi Ajay,
      Thanks for your inputs.  In the std costing run system is showing components as below.
    Material cost       110$
    Material overheads  10$
    Labor cost  20$
    Labor Overheads 10$
    In this Material cost 110$ , materials overheads also included(100$+10$). Why system is calculating Material overheads twice please suggest what mistake i did.
      The material overhead percentage rate is 10%.
    As per my client requirement system should calculate components as shown below
    Material cost 100$
    Material overheads 10$
    Labor cost  20$
    Labor overheads 10$
    Please advise its very urgent, your inputs will be rewarded with points.
    Thanks&Regards,
    Spandana.

  • Issue with Purchasing Price field(Hungary Currency HUF)

    The issue we are facing is related to Hungary Currency HUF, Currency without decimal place. In our scenario we import the data through a flat file with price and currency. After import and displayed on our custom screen the value gets multiplied by a factor of 100.
    As this is a common issue for Hungary Currency. Please suggest if there is a better solution that can be implemented or if there is SAP note that can be implemented. I had searched for a sap note no 1240163 but the note is applicable in SAP BW component only.

    hi
    check following
    Extraction Problem
    Local Currency COP, KRW values wrong in report
    Re: is conditional calculation in the report possible?

  • Issue with Net price at Purchase order / Line item

    Dear All,
    I have an issue in the Purchase order, given below is the detail of the issue.
    PO/LI1 Consists a material A (Grid based), and with a condition record i have maintained sizewise pricing.
    Eg:  Size L - 1usd per 1, Size M - 2usd per 1 and Size S - 3usd per 1. Assume the quantity for each size been 10
    Thus at a Schedule line item level it would be as follows
    Grid   |  Schedule Qty  |  Net Price
    S              10                  3
    M              10                  2
    L               10                  1
    Thus at a PO/ Line item level the net price should be (6/30)that is (net value/net quantity)  = 0.2 per 1, in my system it doesnt show like as 02. per 1, it shows the net price of size L (in this instance it picks the price of size L and shows it as the NET PRICE at PO/LI Level
    What could be the possible reason this could happen, i believe this is a problem.Is there a place in configure where i can change the system to capture Net price at PO Line item =(Net Value / Net quantity) rather than picking the price of the size L.
    Other info
    Size L is the last Delivery Schedule line number
    Hope my question is clear.
    Thanks & Regards
    Shabeen
    Shabeen Buhary
    Edited by: shabenn on Dec 17, 2010 10:13 AM

    Hi,
    Even though you maintained different Prices for Different grids only default grid value only displayed at line item level. But if you do GR for those grids valuation will happened at as you mentioned the purchase order.
    regards,
    Siva reddy

  • Report with Standard price / MAP price

    Hi
    Is their are standard report where i can run the MAP / Stand price. No extraction from table please.
    Thanks
    N

    Thank you guys . I am looking for a report where i can view the standard cost / MAP for a single material. , I want to know what is my MAP if my price is standard and i want to know my standard cost if my  cost is MAP ..
    Your help will be highly appreciated .
    Thanks
    N

  • Anyone had scrolling issues with standard MacPro mouse?

    my mouse no longer scrolls down. i either drag the bar down, or use key. once down, i can use scroll-ball on mouse to scroll back up, the only direction that is functional. at one time, only an intermittent issue, but degraded to becoming unusable. any suggestions?

    The 4 no microscopic magnetic rollers below the ball are covered in fluff and finger oils.
    Even using the recommended cleaning method eventually fails to loosen the fluff because the ONLY way out of the mouse for this build up is by collecting back on the ball then out onto the paper.
    Below the ball is a microswitch unit so the debris can not fall into the body space of the mouse.
    Finally the bottom of the mouse has been glued shut preventing easy general maintenance.
    If you are adventurous you can carry out some surgery to repair the mouse.
    You need a scalpel, some super glue, a very small cross bladed screw driver, and a pair tweezers
    Right turn the mouse up side down , with the scalpel carefully separate the OUTER grey bezel ring from the mouse top and set aside.
    Now press the two side buttons and with your thumb press the front of the top mouse body away from you .
    It should click free.
    It still may be held by two hinge posts about 25mm/1" from the rear of the mouse so use the screw driver to leverage these free with a snap.
    'The body will now be separated however you will now find that the two parts are connected by two ribbon cables.
    These are just pressure fitted to the logic board but being careful you shouldn't dislodge them.
    So twist the bottom plate through ninety degrees and you will see the microswitch held by three cross head screws.
    Unscrew these and set aside.
    Now you can finally clean those little magnets using the tweezers.
    Now reassemble in reverse and finally using the super glue reattach the bezel.
    Allow time to dry and finally plug in USB/Repair if bluetooth and test run what should now be a functioning mouse.

  • Issue with Standard report RPLICO10

    If the standard report RPLICO10 is copied to to a Custom Program.
    Because this program uses LDB, we are not able to print multiple records for a single PERNR on the ALV Report.
    Jus wanted to confirm can we try to print multiple records for single PERNR?
    ( Eg : 0006 infotype has subtype 1 and subtype 2 records )
    I tried to change the code for such infotypes ( Multiple subtype records ), the program is dumping.
    Can someone suggegst a solution for this.
    Regards,
    Srujan

    Hi,
    RPLICO10 is a tricky report but by far one of the best report fo someone who want to take a look into Dynamic Programming in HR.
    For handling such type you have to add them as separaate entities in FIELD SELECTION tab and then write the code for them accordingly in the report, create field catalog for them also.
    If you want to go like any other standard one it will require a complete change in the report logic and also reduce the performance of the report.
    Regards,
    Amit
    Reward all helpful replies.

  • Data Validation issue with Standard Extraction

    Hi Experts,
    I have a requirement to publish a report in BI from ECC, all the details are coming from this DataSource : 2LIS_02_ITM.
    This particular DataSource have the many fields which are from the following tables
    EKKO
    EKPO
    MARA
    EKBE
    I tried replicating the DataSource in BI and created transformation extracted full data.The number of record the DSO (0PUR_O01) has is 27910.
    I checked with the ECC tables. And the number of records they have are
    EKKO -   79129
    EKPO -  250502
    MARA -   40950
    EKBE - 1447470 
    I just don't know how do I check whether BI data is correct with ECC.
    Can anyone please tell me how do I reconcile the data.
    Thanks

    Hi,
    you have to check the number of records for the datasource in RSA3 transaction.
    Also, check the start routine at transformation level, as well as the selections if you have loaded.
    Hope this helps,
    Regards,
    Rama Murthy.

  • Issues with standard RFCs

    Hi ,
    I am getting following error when i tried to execute transaction - SLDCHECK.
    Exchange Infrastructure: Test LCR Connection
    Properties of RFC destination SAPSLDAPI
      RFC host:
    %%RFCSERVER%%
      program id:      SAPSLDAPI_SSD
      gateway host:
    subdev
      gateway service: sapgw00
    Testing the RFC connection to the SLD java client...
    RFC ping returned exception with message:
    program state check for conversation 73851491 / CPIC-CALL: 'ThSAPCMRCV' : cmRc=2
    Summary: Connection to SLD does not work
    => Check SLD function and configurations
    Now checking access to the XI Profile
    Properties of RFC destination LCRSAPRFC
      RFC host:
    %%RFCSERVER%%
      program id:      LCRSAPRFC_SSD
      gateway host:
    subdev
      gateway service: sapgw00
    Testing the RFC connection to the SLD java client...
    RFC ping returned exception with message:
    program state check for conversation 73852497 / CPIC-CALL: 'ThSAPCMRCV' : cmRc=2
    then i tried to test RFC connections : SAPSLDAPI
    and LCRSAPRFC_SSD. I am geting following error:
    Logon     Cancel
    Error Details     program state check for conversation 73534888 / CPIC-CALL: 'ThSAPCMRCV' : cmRc=2
    Error Details     ERROR: program state check for conversation 73534888
    Error Details     LOCATION: SAP-Gateway on host subdev / sapgw00
    Error Details     DETAIL: program sapgw00 on host subdev called function SEND_DATA in state INIT
    Error Details     COMPONENT: SAP-Gateway
    Error Details     COUNTER: 21708
    Error Details     MODULE: gwr3cpic.c
    Error Details     LINE: 3282
    Error Details     RETURN CODE: 471
    Error Details     SUBRC: 0
    Error Details     RELEASE: 700
    Error Details     TIME: Wed Jan  2 11:47:09 2008
    Error Details     VERSION: 2
    thx,
    Vijay

    Hi,
    There are several potential causes for a broken communication between an ABAP WebAS and the System Landscape Directory. The linked Problem Analysis Scenario (PAS) provides a systematic problem analysis and solving flow.
    refer SAP Note 768452
    Hope this will help you a bit.
    Regards
    Aashish Sinha
    PS : reward points if helpful

  • Material valuation(standard price issue)

    Hi Gurus,
    We have some issue in material master record accounting1 view.The standard price for the period 1 of 2010,period 2 of 2010 is showing the value of 1000 correctly.but where as coming to material valuation table(MBEW)it is showing as the value of "1".But where as coming to material ledger the standard price is showing as 1000 correctly.due to the inconsistency data between material valuation and material ledger the system is not allowing to post any transactions.Suggest on this issue.
    Thanks in advance
    Jana

    Hi Janardhan,
    The Material Valuation Table MBEW will be updated, if  you have completed both Marked and Released activities for  the Material through t-code-CK40N for Mass Materials or CK11N and CK24 for Individual Materials. As per your data, in your case this was completed and price was updated for 01  and 02-2010 periods. If you run CK40N-Standard Cost Estimate for Legal/Group/Profit Center valuation and completed till  u201CMarking of Priceu201D i.e., but not executed the activity u201CRelease priceu201D.  It may be for period 03-2010, the Material Master>Accounting view will be updated with standard price and also Material Master>Future Price field will be updated with u201CMarked Priceu201D, but Current Price/Previous Standard Price  fields will show earlier values. Till you u201CRelease the Priceu201D through t-codes CK40N or CK24, this differences will continue. At the start of March 2010 period, if you u201CRelease the priceu201D, all the fields in Material Master will be updated with relevant Current/Previous Standard Price fields. I hope this will clear your doubts.  If you need more clarity in this regard, please let me know.
    Regards
    appalas
    Edited by: appalas on Feb 28, 2010 1:11 PM

  • Urgent:Inventory Modelling with Moving price

    I have to create an Inventory report storage locationwise material stock along with standard price and moving average price.
    We have a z cube zic_c03.
    Moving price and standard price is stored an Z ODS on fiscal/period wise.
    I need to have the following fields in the report
    charactersitics
    Plant
    Material
    Storage location
    Price control(from Z ods)
    keyfigures:
    Valuated stock qty(from zic_c03)
    Valuated stock value(from zic_c03)
    Standard price(from ods)-Using routine
    Moving Price(from ods)-Using Routine
    I have created another cube(included all the fields from zic_c03 and added the three fields from ODS).
    For the fields included from ODS, I have written an lookup routine in the new cube (zic_c04) update rule.
    For ex.Stand price routine as follows:
    PROGRAM UPDATE_ROUTINE.
    TABLES: ...
    DATA : tstd like /BIC/AZMM_O0200-pRICE_std.
    DATA : tavg like /BIC/AZMM_O0200-pRICE_avg.
    DATA : tpc  like /BIC/AZMM_O0200-PRICE_CTRL.
    fill the internal table "MONITOR", to make monitor entries
    select single PRICE_STD
      into tstd
      from /BIC/AZMOV_O0100
    where material = COMM_STRUCTURE-material
       and plant = COMM_STRUCTURE-plant
       and FISCPER = COMM_STRUCTURE-FISCPER.
      RESULT = tstd.
      RETURNCODE = 0.
      ABORT = 0.
    I have the following issues:.
    1)After adding the price control Indicator(assigned to all keyfigures in update rule) Valuated stock qty and value showing in negative.
    2)Intially I didn't compress the new cube(zic_c04).After seeing negative values I compressed(no marker update enabled) it and checked.But still showing negative.
    2)If I assign price control Indicator to only standard price and moving price Iam not getting any results for valuated qty and stock(price control Indicator = 'not assigned')
    Pls help me to do the right modelling for the above requirement.
    Thanks in advance.
    Regards
    Soujanya

    Hi,
    I have different Modeling scenario to get MAP in BIW.
    Take a Look on this thread:
    Re: 2lis_03_um and MBEW- STPRS
    Re: How to get Moving Average Prince and Standard Price in BW (inventory cube).
    With rgds,
    Anil Kumar Sharma .P

  • Standard Price Move Average Price

    Hi guru:
    Can anyone tell me the difference between standard price and move average pirce or what's the relationship between them?Does it affect posting for invoice receive/goods receive?

    Standard vs Moving Average Price
    Generally all raw materials (ROH), spare parts (ERSA), traded goods (HAWA) etc. are assigned as moving average price (MAP) because of the accounting practice of accurately valuating the inventory of such materials. These materials are subject to the purchase price fluctuations on a regular basis.
    Company generally uses moving average on purchased materials with small cost fluctuations.  It is most appropriate when the item is easily obtainable.  The impact on margins are minimized which reduces the need for variance analysis.  Furthermore, the administrative effort is low as there are no cost estimates to maintain.  The cost reflects variances, which are closer to actual costs.
    The semi-finished goods (HALB) and finished products (FERT) are valuated with standard price because of the product costing angle. If these were to be MAP controlled, then finished/semi-finished product valuation would fluctuate due to data entry errors during back flushing of material and labor, production inefficiencies (higher cost) or efficiencies (lower cost). This is not a standard accounting and costing practice.
    Refer to OSS note 81682 - Pr.Contr.V for semi-finished and finished products.
    SAP recommends that standard price to be used for FERT and HALB. If actual price is required for valuation, make used of the functions of material ledger where a periodic actual price is created which is more realistic.
    e.g. how SAP calculate the moving average price
    Goods Receipt for Purchase Order
    Balance on hand quantity + Goods Receipts quantity
    Balance on hand value     + Goods Receipts value
    New Moving Average Price = Total Value / Total Quantity
    Invoice Receipt for Purchase Order
    Invoice price more than Purchase Order price
    u2022     additional value add to Balance on hand value then divided by Balance on  hand quantity
    Invoice price less than Purchase Order price
    u2022     difference is deducted from the Balance on hand value (up to 0).  The rest of the amount will becomes price variance.  This will result in Balance on hand value is zero while there are Balance on hand quantity.  If the Balance on hand value is enough to deduct, then the remaining value will be divided by Balance on hand quantity.
    When your Goods Issue price is constantly greater than your Goods Receipt price, it will result into zero value moving average price.
    OSS note
    185961 - Moving Average Price Calculation.
    88320 - Strong variances when creating moving average price.
    Never allow negative stocks for materials carried at the moving average.
    Hope thil will help you.
    Cheers,
    Parag Mahajan

Maybe you are looking for

  • Build program from existing Driver VIs

    I have an Agilent device (OSA) that I am trying to interface with my PC. I've installed all the necessary drivers (488.2 2.5) and MAX recognizes my device. Agilent provided me with a series of files (MNU files and a LLB [vi library]) that supposedly

  • BPM - Requirement for CCMS Setup?

    Hi all, In the BPM setup guide, it says: "The Computing Center Management System or CCMS Alert Monitor (transaction /nrz20) provides the underlying monitoring infrastructure for Business Process Monitoring." Is there any further information on exactl

  • Moving of images inside a frame anywhere

    hi i have a problem in writing a programm that how can i move pieces of images in panel or frame anywhere (i.e.drag a piece of image and put it near to the another piece of image so that i can join them).

  • Styles keep missing in the menu

    I have a problem with the Style menu in Contribute. I have linked to a special stylesheet for the Publisher, in which I have 14 rules (classes) plus 5 rules (tags). From the 14 rules with classes there are 6 that keep missing in the Style menu. Whate

  • What if you don't remember your security question

    I got a new computer.  Had windows vista but now have windows 7.  When I tried to purchase music, itunes wanted me to answer security questions but I don't remember my answers.  I called Apple support and they said they can't help me.  Does this mean