Issue with UIX Editable Table
Hi,
I have created a Master-Detail-Detail page using UIX. I want to make the last detail table editable. I have tried the tip mentioned in the following page to make the table editable.
http://www.oracle.com/technology/products/jdev/tips/jacobi/edittable/tip_adfuixtable_edit.html
But, the condition in switcher ${uix.current.EmployeeId.inputValue == bindings.EmployeeId.inputValue is always returning false. This is because, the ${bindings.xxxxx} is returning null for all columns.
Could anyone help me in resolve this issue Please?
Here is the uix file I am using:
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="windows-1252"?>
<page xmlns="http://xmlns.oracle.com/uix/controller"
xmlns:ui="http://xmlns.oracle.com/uix/ui"
xmlns:ctrl="http://xmlns.oracle.com/uix/controller"
xmlns:html="http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-html40"
expressionLanguage="el">
<content>
<dataScope xmlns="http://xmlns.oracle.com/uix/ui">
<provider>
<!-- Add DataProviders (<data> elements) here -->
</provider>
<contents>
<document>
<metaContainer>
<!-- Set the page title -->
<head title=""/>
</metaContainer>
<contents>
<body>
<contents>
<form name="form0">
<contents>
<pageLayout>
<about/>
<copyright/>
<corporateBranding/>
<end/>
<globalButtons/>
<pageButtons/>
<pageHeader/>
<privacy/>
<productBranding/>
<start/>
<tabs/>
<contents>
<stackLayout>
<contents>
<header text="Master">
<contents>
<table model="${bindings.SyPohdrAckView1}" id="SyPohdrAckView17" partialRenderMode="multiple" partialTargets="_uixState">
<contents>
<column>
<columnFormat columnDataFormat="numberFormat"/>
<columnHeader>
<sortableHeader model="${ctrl:createSortableHeaderModel(bindings.SyPohdrAckView1,'OfdaFileId')}"/>
</columnHeader>
<contents>
<textInput model="${uix.current.OfdaFileId}" columns="10" readOnly="true">
<onSubmitValidater>
<decimal/>
</onSubmitValidater>
</textInput>
</contents>
</column>
<column>
<columnHeader>
<sortableHeader model="${ctrl:createSortableHeaderModel(bindings.SyPohdrAckView1,'AcknowledgmentNumber')}"/>
</columnHeader>
<contents>
<textInput model="${uix.current.AcknowledgmentNumber}" columns="10" readOnly="true"/>
</contents>
</column>
<column>
<columnHeader>
<sortableHeader model="${ctrl:createSortableHeaderModel(bindings.SyPohdrAckView1,'PoNumber')}"/>
</columnHeader>
<contents>
<textInput model="${uix.current.PoNumber}" columns="10" readOnly="true"/>
</contents>
</column>
<column>
<columnFormat cellNoWrapFormat="true"/>
<columnHeader>
<sortableHeader model="${ctrl:createSortableHeaderModel(bindings.SyPohdrAckView1,'PlannedDeliveryDate')}"/>
</columnHeader>
<contents>
<dateField model="${uix.current.PlannedDeliveryDate}" readOnly="true">
<onSubmitValidater>
<date pattern="yyyy-MM-dd"/>
</onSubmitValidater>
</dateField>
</contents>
</column>
<column>
<columnFormat columnDataFormat="numberFormat"/>
<columnHeader>
<sortableHeader model="${ctrl:createSortableHeaderModel(bindings.SyPohdrAckView1,'PoOrdTotal')}"/>
</columnHeader>
<contents>
<textInput model="${uix.current.PoOrdTotal}" columns="10" readOnly="true">
<onSubmitValidater>
<decimal/>
</onSubmitValidater>
</textInput>
</contents>
</column>
<column>
<columnHeader>
<sortableHeader model="${ctrl:createSortableHeaderModel(bindings.SyPohdrAckView1,'AcknowledgeStatus')}"/>
</columnHeader>
<contents>
<textInput model="${uix.current.AcknowledgeStatus}" columns="10" readOnly="true"/>
</contents>
</column>
<column>
<columnHeader>
<sortableHeader model="${ctrl:createSortableHeaderModel(bindings.SyPohdrAckView1,'AcknowledgeInfo')}"/>
</columnHeader>
<contents>
<textInput model="${uix.current.AcknowledgeInfo}" columns="10" readOnly="true"/>
</contents>
</column>
<column>
<columnFormat cellNoWrapFormat="true"/>
<columnHeader>
<sortableHeader model="${ctrl:createSortableHeaderModel(bindings.SyPohdrAckView1,'AcknowledgeDate')}"/>
</columnHeader>
<contents>
<dateField model="${uix.current.AcknowledgeDate}" readOnly="true">
<onSubmitValidater>
<date pattern="yyyy-MM-dd"/>
</onSubmitValidater>
</dateField>
</contents>
</column>
<column>
<columnFormat columnDataFormat="numberFormat"/>
<columnHeader>
<sortableHeader model="${ctrl:createSortableHeaderModel(bindings.SyPohdrAckView1,'AcknowledgeByCtIdNo')}"/>
</columnHeader>
<contents>
<textInput model="${uix.current.AcknowledgeByCtIdNo}" columns="10" readOnly="true">
<onSubmitValidater>
<decimal/>
</onSubmitValidater>
</textInput>
</contents>
</column>
</contents>
<tableSelection>
<singleSelection model="${bindings.SyPohdrAckView1Iterator}" text="Select and ">
<primaryClientAction>
<firePartialAction targets="detail6 detail12 _uixState" source="SyPohdrAckView17" event="select"/>
</primaryClientAction>
</singleSelection>
</tableSelection>
</table>
</contents>
</header>
<header text="Detail" id="detail6">
<contents>
<table model="${bindings.SyPolineAckView2}" id="SyPolineAckView28" partialRenderMode="multiple" partialTargets="_uixState">
<contents>
<column>
<columnFormat columnDataFormat="numberFormat"/>
<columnHeader>
<sortableHeader model="${ctrl:createSortableHeaderModel(bindings.SyPolineAckView2,'OfdaFileId')}"/>
</columnHeader>
<contents>
<textInput model="${uix.current.OfdaFileId}" columns="10" readOnly="true">
<onSubmitValidater>
<decimal/>
</onSubmitValidater>
</textInput>
</contents>
</column>
<column>
<columnHeader>
<sortableHeader model="${ctrl:createSortableHeaderModel(bindings.SyPolineAckView2,'AcknowledgmentNumber')}"/>
</columnHeader>
<contents>
<textInput model="${uix.current.AcknowledgmentNumber}" columns="10" readOnly="true"/>
</contents>
</column>
<column>
<columnHeader>
<sortableHeader model="${ctrl:createSortableHeaderModel(bindings.SyPolineAckView2,'PoNumber')}"/>
</columnHeader>
<contents>
<textInput model="${uix.current.PoNumber}" columns="10" readOnly="true"/>
</contents>
</column>
<column>
<columnFormat columnDataFormat="numberFormat"/>
<columnHeader>
<sortableHeader model="${ctrl:createSortableHeaderModel(bindings.SyPolineAckView2,'LineItemNumber')}"/>
</columnHeader>
<contents>
<textInput model="${uix.current.LineItemNumber}" columns="10" readOnly="true">
<onSubmitValidater>
<decimal/>
</onSubmitValidater>
</textInput>
</contents>
</column>
<column>
<columnHeader>
<sortableHeader model="${ctrl:createSortableHeaderModel(bindings.SyPolineAckView2,'SpecItemNo')}"/>
</columnHeader>
<contents>
<textInput model="${uix.current.SpecItemNo}" columns="10" readOnly="true"/>
</contents>
</column>
<column>
<columnFormat columnDataFormat="numberFormat"/>
<columnHeader>
<sortableHeader model="${ctrl:createSortableHeaderModel(bindings.SyPolineAckView2,'Quantity')}"/>
</columnHeader>
<contents>
<textInput model="${uix.current.Quantity}" columns="10" readOnly="true">
<onSubmitValidater>
<decimal/>
</onSubmitValidater>
</textInput>
</contents>
</column>
<column>
<columnFormat columnDataFormat="numberFormat"/>
<columnHeader>
<sortableHeader model="${ctrl:createSortableHeaderModel(bindings.SyPolineAckView2,'Cost')}"/>
</columnHeader>
<contents>
<textInput model="${uix.current.Cost}" columns="10" readOnly="true">
<onSubmitValidater>
<decimal/>
</onSubmitValidater>
</textInput>
</contents>
</column>
<column>
<columnFormat cellNoWrapFormat="true"/>
<columnHeader>
<sortableHeader model="${ctrl:createSortableHeaderModel(bindings.SyPolineAckView2,'PlannedDeliveryDate')}"/>
</columnHeader>
<contents>
<dateField model="${uix.current.PlannedDeliveryDate}" readOnly="true">
<onSubmitValidater>
<date pattern="yyyy-MM-dd"/>
</onSubmitValidater>
</dateField>
</contents>
</column>
<column>
<columnHeader>
<sortableHeader model="${ctrl:createSortableHeaderModel(bindings.SyPolineAckView2,'AcknowledgeStatus')}"/>
</columnHeader>
<contents>
<textInput model="${uix.current.AcknowledgeStatus}" columns="10" readOnly="true"/>
</contents>
</column>
<column>
<columnHeader>
<sortableHeader model="${ctrl:createSortableHeaderModel(bindings.SyPolineAckView2,'AcknowledgeInfo')}"/>
</columnHeader>
<contents>
<textInput model="${uix.current.AcknowledgeInfo}" columns="10" readOnly="true"/>
</contents>
</column>
<column>
<columnFormat cellNoWrapFormat="true"/>
<columnHeader>
<sortableHeader model="${ctrl:createSortableHeaderModel(bindings.SyPolineAckView2,'AcknowledgeDate')}"/>
</columnHeader>
<contents>
<dateField model="${uix.current.AcknowledgeDate}" readOnly="true">
<onSubmitValidater>
<date pattern="yyyy-MM-dd"/>
</onSubmitValidater>
</dateField>
</contents>
</column>
<column>
<columnFormat columnDataFormat="numberFormat"/>
<columnHeader>
<sortableHeader model="${ctrl:createSortableHeaderModel(bindings.SyPolineAckView2,'AcknowledgeByCtIdNo')}"/>
</columnHeader>
<contents>
<textInput model="${uix.current.AcknowledgeByCtIdNo}" columns="10" readOnly="true">
<onSubmitValidater>
<decimal/>
</onSubmitValidater>
</textInput>
</contents>
</column>
<column>
<columnHeader>
<sortableHeader model="${ctrl:createSortableHeaderModel(bindings.SyPolineAckView2,'RowID')}"/>
</columnHeader>
<contents>
<textInput model="${uix.current.RowID}" columns="10" readOnly="true"/>
</contents>
</column>
</contents>
<tableSelection>
<singleSelection model="${bindings.SyPolineAckView2Iterator}" text="Select and ">
<primaryClientAction>
<firePartialAction targets="detail12 _uixState" source="SyPolineAckView28" event="select"/>
</primaryClientAction>
</singleSelection>
</tableSelection>
</table>
</contents>
</header>
</contents>
</stackLayout>
<stackLayout>
<contents>
<header text="Detail" id="detail12">
<contents>
<table nameTransformed="false" model="${bindings.PoLineView2}" id="PoLineView214" partialRenderMode="multiple" partialTargets="_uixState" formSubmitted="true">
<contents>
<column>
<columnHeader>
<sortableHeader model="${ctrl:createSortableHeaderModel(bindings.PoLineView2,'PoNo')}"/>
</columnHeader>
<contents>
<textInput model="${uix.current.PoNo}" columns="10" readOnly="true"/>
</contents>
</column>
<column>
<columnFormat columnDataFormat="numberFormat"/>
<columnHeader>
<sortableHeader model="${ctrl:createSortableHeaderModel(bindings.PoLineView2,'LineNo')}"/>
</columnHeader>
<contents>
<textInput model="${uix.current.LineNo}" columns="10" readOnly="true">
<onSubmitValidater>
<decimal/>
</onSubmitValidater>
</textInput>
</contents>
</column>
<column>
<columnHeader>
<sortableHeader model="${ctrl:createSortableHeaderModel(bindings.PoLineView2,'ItemNo')}"/>
</columnHeader>
<contents>
<textInput model="${uix.current.ItemNo}" columns="10" readOnly="true"/>
</contents>
</column>
<column>
<columnHeader>
<sortableHeader model="${ctrl:createSortableHeaderModel(bindings.PoLineView2,'ItemStyle')}"/>
</columnHeader>
<contents>
<textInput model="${uix.current.ItemStyle}" columns="10" readOnly="true"/>
</contents>
</column>
<column>
<columnHeader>
<sortableHeader model="${ctrl:createSortableHeaderModel(bindings.PoLineView2,'VendorNo')}"/>
</columnHeader>
<contents>
<textInput model="${uix.current.VendorNo}" columns="10" readOnly="true"/>
</contents>
</column>
<column>
<columnHeader>
<sortableHeader model="${ctrl:createSortableHeaderModel(bindings.PoLineView2,'VendorItemNo')}"/>
</columnHeader>
<contents>
<textInput model="${uix.current.VendorItemNo}" columns="10" readOnly="true"/>
</contents>
</column>
<column>
<columnFormat columnDataFormat="numberFormat"/>
<columnHeader>
<sortableHeader model="${ctrl:createSortableHeaderModel(bindings.PoLineView2,'QtyOrd')}"/>
</columnHeader>
<contents>
<switcher childName="${uix.current.PoNo.inputValue == bindings.PoNo.inputValue ? 'selected' : 'notselected'}">
<case name="selected">
<textInput model="${bindings.QtyOrd}" columns="10" readOnly="false">
<onSubmitValidater>
<decimal/>
</onSubmitValidater>
</textInput>
</case>
<case name="notselected">
<textInput model="${uix.current.QtyOrd}" columns="10" readOnly="true">
<onSubmitValidater>
<decimal/>
</onSubmitValidater>
</textInput>
</case>
</switcher>
</contents>
</column>
<column>
<columnFormat columnDataFormat="numberFormat"/>
<columnHeader>
<sortableHeader model="${ctrl:createSortableHeaderModel(bindings.PoLineView2,'UnitPrice')}"/>
</columnHeader>
<contents>
<textInput model="${uix.current.UnitPrice}" columns="10" readOnly="true">
<onSubmitValidater>
<decimal/>
</onSubmitValidater>
</textInput>
</contents>
</column>
<column>
<columnFormat columnDataFormat="numberFormat"/>
<columnHeader>
<sortableHeader model="${ctrl:createSortableHeaderModel(bindings.PoLineView2,'LineAmt')}"/>
</columnHeader>
<contents>
<textInput model="${uix.current.LineAmt}" columns="10" readOnly="true">
<onSubmitValidater>
<decimal/>
</onSubmitValidater>
</textInput>
</contents>
</column>
<column>
<columnFormat cellNoWrapFormat="true"/>
<columnHeader>
<sortableHeader model="${ctrl:createSortableHeaderModel(bindings.PoLineView2,'DateCreated')}"/>
</columnHeader>
<contents>
<dateField model="${uix.current.DateCreated}" readOnly="true">
<onSubmitValidater>
<date pattern="yyyy-MM-dd"/>
</onSubmitValidater>
</dateField>
</contents>
</column>
<column>
<columnFormat cellNoWrapFormat="true"/>
<columnHeader>
<sortableHeader model="${ctrl:createSortableHeaderModel(bindings.PoLineView2,'DueDate')}"/>
</columnHeader>
<contents>
<dateField model="${uix.current.DueDate}" readOnly="true">
<onSubmitValidater>
<date pattern="yyyy-MM-dd"/>
</onSubmitValidater>
</dateField>
</contents>
</column>
<column>
<contents>
<submitButton text="Commit" model="${bindings.Commit}" id="Commit15" event="action" disabled="false"/>
</contents>
</column>
</contents>
<tableSelection>
<singleSelection model="${bindings.PoLineView2Iterator}" text="Select and ">
<primaryClientAction>
<firePartialAction targets="_uixState PoLineView214" source="PoLineView214" event="select" formSubmitted="true"/>
</primaryClientAction>
</singleSelection>
</tableSelection>
</table>
</contents>
</header>
</contents>
</stackLayout>
</contents>
</pageLayout>
<formValue name="${bindings.statetokenid}" value="${bindings.statetoken}" id="_uixState"/>
</contents>
</form>
</contents>
</body>
</contents>
</document>
</contents>
</dataScope>
</content>
<handlers>
<!-- Add EventHandlers (<event> elements) here -->
<event name="goto sort" source="SyPohdrAckView17">
<invoke method="handleTableUiEvent" javaType="oracle.cabo.adf.rt.AdfUtils">
<parameters>
<parameter javaType="oracle.adf.model.binding.DCIteratorBinding" value="${bindings.SyPohdrAckView1Iterator}"/>
<parameter javaType="oracle.cabo.servlet.expl.ControllerImplicitObject" value="${uix}"/>
</parameters>
</invoke>
</event>
<event name="select" source="SyPohdrAckView17">
<set target="${bindings.SyPohdrAckView1Iterator}" property="currentRowIndexInRange" value="${ui:tableSelectedIndex(uix, 'SyPohdrAckView17')}"/>
</event>
<event name="goto sort" source="SyPolineAckView28">
<invoke method="handleTableUiEvent" javaType="oracle.cabo.adf.rt.AdfUtils">
<parameters>
<parameter javaType="oracle.adf.model.binding.DCIteratorBinding" value="${bindings.SyPolineAckView2Iterator}"/>
<parameter javaType="oracle.cabo.servlet.expl.ControllerImplicitObject" value="${uix}"/>
</parameters>
</invoke>
</event>
<event name="select" source="SyPolineAckView28">
<set target="${bindings.SyPolineAckView2Iterator}" property="currentRowIndexInRange" value="${ui:tableSelectedIndex(uix, 'SyPolineAckView28')}"/>
</event>
<event name="goto sort" source="SyPolineAckView213">
<invoke method="handleTableUiEvent" javaType="oracle.cabo.adf.rt.AdfUtils">
<parameters>
<parameter javaType="oracle.adf.model.binding.DCIteratorBinding" value="${bindings.SyPolineAckView2Iterator}"/>
<parameter javaType="oracle.cabo.servlet.expl.ControllerImplicitObject" value="${uix}"/>
</parameters>
</invoke>
</event>
<event name="select" source="SyPolineAckView213">
<set target="${bindings.SyPolineAckView2Iterator}" property="currentRowIndexInRange" value="${ui:tableSelectedIndex(uix, 'SyPolineAckView213')}"/>
</event>
<event name="goto sort" source="PoLineView214">
<invoke method="handleTableUiEvent" javaType="oracle.cabo.adf.rt.AdfUtils">
<parameters>
<parameter javaType="oracle.adf.model.binding.DCIteratorBinding" value="${bindings.PoLineView2Iterator}"/>
<parameter javaType="oracle.cabo.servlet.expl.ControllerImplicitObject" value="${uix}"/>
</parameters>
</invoke>
</event>
<event name="select" source="PoLineView214">
<set target="${bindings.PoLineView2Iterator}" property="currentRowIndexInRange" value="${ui:tableSelectedIndex(uix, 'PoLineView214')}"/>
</event>
<event name="action" source="Commit15">
<invoke method="doIt" javaType="oracle.jbo.uicli.binding.JUCtrlActionBinding" instance="${bindings.Commit}"/>
</event>
</handlers>
</page>
hi all,
it looks this where clause not filter with 'N' data ,Please help me ,how to solve this or help me on this
Similar Messages
-
Issue with Update of Table VARINUM
Hi,
I am getting waiting Issues with Update of table VARINUM. Has anybody faced such an issue.
I have a lot of Jobs which are running in background. I am submitting it through a report. what can be the issue.
Regards,
Abhishek jollyThisi is quite old, but not answered properly yet, so there you go:
SAP generates a new job and temporary variant on report RSDBSPJS, for each HTTP call,which creates database locks on table VARINUM .
This causes any heavyweight BSP application to hang and give timeout errors.
The problem is fixed applying OSS note 1791958, which is not included in any service pack. -
Issue with data dictionary -Table maintanance generator
Hi all,
I have an issue with Data dictionary, table maintenance generator. I have entered some records in a custom table (ZBCSECROLETOGRP) and changed the delivery class from C to A. When I create the table maintainance generator, I am encountered with the following errors:
1)Field ZBCSECROLETOGRP-PORTALGROUP shortened (new visible length: 000032)
2)0012 could not be generated
3)In TCTRL_ZBCSECROLETOGRP field LENGTH has the invalid value 01
My main motto is to create the table maintainace generator and transport to the furthur systems .
Please help.
ThnX in advance,
Vishal..HI,
Regenerate the table maintenance by selecting the checkbox of "Modified field structure" => new entry & then save.
Also ensure that the new changes are not affecting old data bcz of data type changes. If that is the case, then delete the old records, regenerate table maint. & re-enter those records which you had deleted.
Thanks,
Best regards,
Prashant -
CVC creation - Strange issue with Master data table of 9AMATNR
Hi Experts,
We have encountered a strange issue with Master data table (/BI0/9APMATNR) of info object 9AMATNR.
We have a BADI implemented for checking the valid Characteristic before creation of the CVC using transaction /SAPAPO/MC62. This BADI puts a select on master data tab of material /BI0/9APMATNR and returns no value. But the material actually exists in the table (checked through SE16).
Now we go inside the info object 9AMATNR and go to the Master data Tab. There we go inside the master table
/BI0/9APMATNR and activate that. After activating the table it is read by the select statement inside BADI (Strange) and allows the CVC to be created.
Ideally it should not allow us to activate the SAP standard table /BI0/9APMATNR. I observed that in technical settings of this table it has single record buffering as switched on. (But as per my knowledge buffer gets refreshed every 2 to 4 mins and not in 2 days or something).
Your expert comment is valuable to us. Thanks.
Best Regards,
Chandan DubeyHi Chandan,
Try to use a WAIT statment with 5 seconds before your select statment.
I'm not sure whether this will work. Anyway check it and let me know the result.
Regards,
Siva. -
Help!! UIX Editable Table and RowID
I Have UIX with Editable Table:
<switcher childName="${uix.current.PatrRowID.inputValue == bindings.PatrRowID.inputValue ? 'selected' : 'notselected'}">
<case name="selected">
<textInput model="${bindings.PatrCode}" columns="10" readOnly="false"/>
</case>
<case name="notselected">
<textInput model="${uix.current.PatrCode}" columns="10" readOnly="true"/>
</case>
</switcher>
whenn i update colum , i have error
ORA-00904: "PATR_ROW_ID"
i have EO with RowID column..The new "Create" has also another issues - I am not able to use getCurrentRow in ViewObject. Workaround is to use old 40 behaviour but I think that such big change should be much more documented and because developer sometimes needs to use the 40 behaviour it should be shown in the DataControl. Any comments?
-
Oracle 10g - issue with "DELETE from TABLE WHERE ID in (1,2,3)" (cfqueryparam used)
Hello, everyone.
I am having issues with running a DELETE statement on an Oracle 10g database.
DELETE
FROM tableA
WHERE ID in (1,2,3)
If there is only one ID for the IN clause, it works. But if more than one ID is supplied, I get an "SQL command not properly ended" error message. Here is the query as CF:
DELETE
FROM TRAINING
WHERE userID = <cfqueryparam cfsqltype="CF_SQL_VARCHAR" value="#trim(form.userID)#">
AND TRAINING_ID in <cfqueryparam value="#form.trainingIDs#" cfsqltype="CF_SQL_INTEGER" list="yes">
Anyone work with Oracle that can help me with this? I'm an experienced MS-SQL developer; Oracle is new to me.
Thanks,
^_^Nevermind.. a co-worker just told me that I still have to use parenthesis around the values for the IN clause.
-
When you try to delete a row in an editable table using the built-in functions, it no longer works. We use this function regularly and just noticed this problem today. The "create row above" and "create row below" functions work, just not the delete. The delete column button does work however, so it's a bit baffling why this one function does not work. (The pages are located on our internal server so are not publicly accessible but the functionality is built into firefox.)
Same problem here. I found out that when you have a table with only 1 row, it works fine, but when you have multiple rows, it doesn't work on any row.
Micmark, do you have that too?
P.S. I also tried this outside our CMS, by using Firebug to add a contenteditable="true" on a DIV in a normal font-end template, and that has the same problem. -
Issue with Period Control Table after copying Essbase adapter
Hi Experts,
I'm working on version 11.1.1.3 and have copied the adapters (Essbase, Pull + EPRi) in the work bench so I can add an additional target for the FDM application. However, I have an issue with the import process; it returns an error with the Time & Periods (I guess it's something to do with the Periods category).
I have reimported the Periods Control Table and updated the new application's Target Period & Year (whilst changing the system code in the Application settings to the newl adapter) and still receive the same error message.
Any direction or thoughts would be welcome.
Thanks
MarkThe time periods do not copy. You need to maintain them through the UI or upload them from excel. There is a KM article on this if you need additional detail.
-
Issue with updating partitioned table
Hi,
Anyone seen this bug with updating partitioned tables.
Its very esoteric - its occurs when we update a partitioned table using a join to a temp table (not non-temp table) when the join has multiple joins and you're updating the partitoned column that isn't the first column in the primary key and the table contains a bit field. We've tried changing just one of these features and the bug disappears.
We've tested this on 15.5 and 15.7 SP122 and the error occurs in both of them.
Here's the test case - it does the same operation of a partitioned table and a non-partitioned table, but the partitioned table shows and error of "Attempt to insert duplicate key row in object 'partitioned' with unique index 'pk'".
I'd be interested if anyone has seen this and has a version of Sybase without the issue.
Unfortunately when it happens on a replicated table - it takes down rep server.
CREATE TABLE #table1
( PK char(8) null,
FileDate date,
changed bit
CREATE TABLE partitioned (
PK char(8) NOT NULL,
ValidFrom date DEFAULT current_date() NOT NULL,
ValidTo date DEFAULT '31-Dec-9999' NOT NULL
LOCK DATAROWS
PARTITION BY RANGE (ValidTo)
( p2014 VALUES <= ('20141231') ON [default],
p2015 VALUES <= ('20151231') ON [default],
pMAX VALUES <= (MAX) ON [default]
CREATE UNIQUE CLUSTERED INDEX pk
ON partitioned(PK, ValidFrom, ValidTo)
LOCAL INDEX
CREATE TABLE unpartitioned (
PK char(8) NOT NULL,
ValidFrom date DEFAULT current_date() NOT NULL,
ValidTo date DEFAULT '31-Dec-9999' NOT NULL,
LOCK DATAROWS
CREATE UNIQUE CLUSTERED INDEX pk
ON unpartitioned(PK, ValidFrom, ValidTo)
insert partitioned
select "ET00jPzh", "Jan 7 2015", "Dec 31 9999"
insert unpartitioned
select "ET00jPzh", "Jan 7 2015", "Dec 31 9999"
insert #table1
select "ET00jPzh", "Jan 15 2015", 1
union all
select "ET00jPzh", "Jan 15 2015", 1
go
update partitioned
set ValidTo = dateadd(dd,-1,FileDate)
from #table1 t
inner join partitioned p on (p.PK = t.PK)
where p.ValidTo = '99991231'
and t.changed = 1
go
update unpartitioned
set ValidTo = dateadd(dd,-1,FileDate)
from #table1 t
inner join unpartitioned u on (u.PK = t.PK)
where u.ValidTo = '99991231'
and t.changed = 1
go
drop table #table1
go
drop table partitioned
drop table unpartitioned
gowrt to replication - it is a bit unclear as not enough information has been stated to point out what happened. I also am not sure that your DBA's are accurately telling you what happened - and may have made the problem worse by not knowing themselves what to do - e.g. 'losing' the log points to fact that someone doesn't know what they should. You can *always* disable the replication secondary truncation point and resync a standby system, so claims about 'losing' the log are a bit strange to be making.
wrt to ASE versions, I suspect if there are any differences, it may have to do with endian-ness and not the version of ASE itself. There may be other factors.....but I would suggest the best thing would be to open a separate message/case on it.
Adaptive Server Enterprise/15.7/EBF 23010 SMP SP130 /P/X64/Windows Server/ase157sp13x/3819/64-bit/OPT/Fri Aug 22 22:28:21 2014:
-- testing with tinyint
1> use demo_db
1>
2> CREATE TABLE #table1
3> ( PK char(8) null,
4> FileDate date,
5> -- changed bit
6> changed tinyint
7> )
8>
9> CREATE TABLE partitioned (
10> PK char(8) NOT NULL,
11> ValidFrom date DEFAULT current_date() NOT NULL,
12> ValidTo date DEFAULT '31-Dec-9999' NOT NULL
13> )
14>
15> LOCK DATAROWS
16> PARTITION BY RANGE (ValidTo)
17> ( p2014 VALUES <= ('20141231') ON [default],
18> p2015 VALUES <= ('20151231') ON [default],
19> pMAX VALUES <= (MAX) ON [default]
20> )
21>
22> CREATE UNIQUE CLUSTERED INDEX pk
23> ON partitioned(PK, ValidFrom, ValidTo)
24> LOCAL INDEX
25>
26> CREATE TABLE unpartitioned (
27> PK char(8) NOT NULL,
28> ValidFrom date DEFAULT current_date() NOT NULL,
29> ValidTo date DEFAULT '31-Dec-9999' NOT NULL,
30> )
31> LOCK DATAROWS
32>
33> CREATE UNIQUE CLUSTERED INDEX pk
34> ON unpartitioned(PK, ValidFrom, ValidTo)
35>
36> insert partitioned
37> select "ET00jPzh", "Jan 7 2015", "Dec 31 9999"
38>
39> insert unpartitioned
40> select "ET00jPzh", "Jan 7 2015", "Dec 31 9999"
41>
42> insert #table1
43> select "ET00jPzh", "Jan 15 2015", 1
44> union all
45> select "ET00jPzh", "Jan 15 2015", 1
(1 row affected)
(1 row affected)
(2 rows affected)
1>
2> update partitioned
3> set ValidTo = dateadd(dd,-1,FileDate)
4> from #table1 t
5> inner join partitioned p on (p.PK = t.PK)
6> where p.ValidTo = '99991231'
7> and t.changed = 1
Msg 2601, Level 14, State 6:
Server 'PHILLY_ASE', Line 2:
Attempt to insert duplicate key row in object 'partitioned' with unique index 'pk'
Command has been aborted.
(0 rows affected)
1>
2> update unpartitioned
3> set ValidTo = dateadd(dd,-1,FileDate)
4> from #table1 t
5> inner join unpartitioned u on (u.PK = t.PK)
6> where u.ValidTo = '99991231'
7> and t.changed = 1
(1 row affected)
1>
2> drop table #table1
1>
2> drop table partitioned
3> drop table unpartitioned
-- duplicating with 'int'
1> use demo_db
1>
2> CREATE TABLE #table1
3> ( PK char(8) null,
4> FileDate date,
5> -- changed bit
6> changed int
7> )
8>
9> CREATE TABLE partitioned (
10> PK char(8) NOT NULL,
11> ValidFrom date DEFAULT current_date() NOT NULL,
12> ValidTo date DEFAULT '31-Dec-9999' NOT NULL
13> )
14>
15> LOCK DATAROWS
16> PARTITION BY RANGE (ValidTo)
17> ( p2014 VALUES <= ('20141231') ON [default],
18> p2015 VALUES <= ('20151231') ON [default],
19> pMAX VALUES <= (MAX) ON [default]
20> )
21>
22> CREATE UNIQUE CLUSTERED INDEX pk
23> ON partitioned(PK, ValidFrom, ValidTo)
24> LOCAL INDEX
25>
26> CREATE TABLE unpartitioned (
27> PK char(8) NOT NULL,
28> ValidFrom date DEFAULT current_date() NOT NULL,
29> ValidTo date DEFAULT '31-Dec-9999' NOT NULL,
30> )
31> LOCK DATAROWS
32>
33> CREATE UNIQUE CLUSTERED INDEX pk
34> ON unpartitioned(PK, ValidFrom, ValidTo)
35>
36> insert partitioned
37> select "ET00jPzh", "Jan 7 2015", "Dec 31 9999"
38>
39> insert unpartitioned
40> select "ET00jPzh", "Jan 7 2015", "Dec 31 9999"
41>
42> insert #table1
43> select "ET00jPzh", "Jan 15 2015", 1
44> union all
45> select "ET00jPzh", "Jan 15 2015", 1
(1 row affected)
(1 row affected)
(2 rows affected)
1>
2> update partitioned
3> set ValidTo = dateadd(dd,-1,FileDate)
4> from #table1 t
5> inner join partitioned p on (p.PK = t.PK)
6> where p.ValidTo = '99991231'
7> and t.changed = 1
Msg 2601, Level 14, State 6:
Server 'PHILLY_ASE', Line 2:
Attempt to insert duplicate key row in object 'partitioned' with unique index 'pk'
Command has been aborted.
(0 rows affected)
1>
2> update unpartitioned
3> set ValidTo = dateadd(dd,-1,FileDate)
4> from #table1 t
5> inner join unpartitioned u on (u.PK = t.PK)
6> where u.ValidTo = '99991231'
7> and t.changed = 1
(1 row affected)
1>
2> drop table #table1
1>
2> drop table partitioned
3> drop table unpartitioned -
Hi All,
i am facing issue with apex 4.2.4 ,using the Data Load Table concept's and in this look up used the
Where Clause option ,it seems to be not working this where clause ,Please help me on thishi all,
it looks this where clause not filter with 'N' data ,Please help me ,how to solve this or help me on this -
Unable to uncheck checkbox in UIX editable table
It seams that in editable table is unable to uncheck checked checkbox. After submit checkbox is stays checked. To check it works fine. To uncheck it in imput form also works fine. Problem is only in editable table. version jdev10.1.2. Thank you. Jara
this is the UIX code
<switcher childName="${uix.current.Iid.inputValue == bindings.Iid.inputValue ? 'edit' : 'noEdit'}">
<case name="edit">
<checkBox model="${bindings.IsDefault}" readOnly="false"/>
</case>
<case name="noEdit">
<checkBox model="${uix.current.IsDefault}" readOnly="true"/>
</case>
</switcher> -
Scalability issue with global temporary table.
Hi All,
Does create global temporary table would lock data disctionary like create table? if yes would not it be a scalable issue with multi user environment?
Thanks and Regards,
RudraBilly Verreynne wrote:
acadet wrote:
am I correct in interpreting your response that we should be using GTT's in favour of bulk operations and collections and in memory operations? No. I said collections cannot scale. This means due to the fact that collections reside in expensive PGA memory, you cannot stuff large data volumes into them. Thus they do not make an ideal storage bin for temporary data (e.g. data loaded from file or a web service). GTTs otoh do not suffer from the same restrictions, can be indexed and offer vastly better scalability and so on.
Multiple passes are often needed using such a data structure. Or filtering to find specific data. As a GTT is a SQL native, it offers a lot more flexibility and performance in this regard.
And this makes sense - as where do we put out persistent data? Also in tables, but ones of a persistent and not temporary kind like a GTT.
Collections are pretty useful - but limited in size and capability.
Rudra states:
I want to pull out few metrices from differnt tables and processing itIf this can't be achieved in a SQL statement, unless Rudra is a master of understatement then I would see GTT's as a waste of IO and programming effort. I agree.
My comments however were about choices for a temporary data storage bin in PL/SQL.I agree with your general comments regarding temporary storage bins in Oracle, but to say that collections don't scale is putting to narrow a definition on scaling. True, collections can be resource intensive in terms of memory and CPU requirements, but their persistence will generally be much shorter than other types of temporary storage. Given the right characteristics, collections will scale and given the wrong characteristics GTT's wont scale.
As you say it is all about choice. Getting back to the theme of this thread though, the original poster should be made aware that well designed and well coded applications are most likely to scale. Creating tables on the fly is generally considered bad practice and letting the database do what it does best, join tables in queries at the SQL level is considered good practice. The rest lies somewhere in between and knowing when to do which is why we get paid the big bucks (not). ;-)
Regards
Andre -
UIX Editable Table: Unselected Textinput Empty
I created a editable Table like described in the How-To (I did this in Jdev 9.0.5.2). Now after Converting to 10.1.2 I had to add a new coloumn to the table.
In this coloumn theres a choice on select and a readonly textinput on unselect.
The choice works fine, but the Textinput is always empty.
There are two bindings in the UI-model. one for the choice and one for the textinput.
Has anybody got an idea?
Thanks for your help,
SebastianThe new "Create" has also another issues - I am not able to use getCurrentRow in ViewObject. Workaround is to use old 40 behaviour but I think that such big change should be much more documented and because developer sometimes needs to use the 40 behaviour it should be shown in the DataControl. Any comments?
-
In the example rows become editable when you click on the radio select at begining of the row, But how can I make the row to be editable as soon as I move my cursor on the textinput fields.
Thanks
regards
JOThere are two threads with the same question, so i'll close this one and point to the original:
ADF UIX Editable Table -
Export Issues with Compressed Partition Tables?
We recently partitioned and compressed some large tables. It appears, but I'm not sure yet, that this is causing the export to run extremely slow. The database is at 10.2.0.2 and we are using the exp utility, not datapump. Does anyone know of any known issues with using exp to export compressed, partitioned tables?
can you give more details of the table structure with dbms_metadata if possible, and how you are taking the export please?
did you try to take an sql*trace of the export process to see what is going on behind, this is an introduction if you may need;
http://tonguc.wordpress.com/2006/12/30/introduction-to-oracle-trace-utulity-and-understanding-the-fundamental-performance-equation/
Maybe you are looking for
-
URGENT: Wrong Info on Return Labels for Exchange Orders.
Hi! SAP Gurus Exchange orders are being shipped with labels attached on the box that says DO not return defective part and because of this the customer will either dispose of the part, and therefore the business will not receive the defective back an
-
How can I get back all the factory channel strip presets?
Hi Guys I have deleted some of the channel strip presets in Logic 8, is there any easy way of getting back all the original factory ones? Cheers, Mike
-
House number is missing in the output
Dear all, Though House number (HOUSE_NUM1) is been maintained in the CMR for a set of customers, but in the return output type house number is not printing. can any one tell me what will be the reason for this thanks, satish
-
We have implemented DMS and created profiles to restrict viewing by document type based on security roles, which works as expected. We did notice that with this set up a filter icon shows up when in the DIR and when clicked displays the documents tha
-
I downloaded the latest version of Muse earlier today and made a couple small changes to a website and uploaded them to the site. Everything worked fine. Later I went back to make a couple more changes (including changing the name of one of the pages