Issues with Ordering

I've just moved to a new place and would like to get Infinity setup. When I check the area, everything seems fine. It then asks for my specific address. The place I've moved to is a home that's been split into flats. There are 5 flats in this place, all are listed except mine. I can select the other places, even just select the house number without a flat and select Infinity. However, if I try to enter my flat number, it says Infinity isn't available.
I'm thinking of just selecting my house number, not the flat so that I can order it, but with a two week wait until BT can come to install, I don't want to have any problems when they arrive.
Is there any reason why infinity wouldn't be available at my flat, yet it would at all others in the building?

have you got an active BT phone line
If you want to say thanks for a helpful answer,please click on the Ratings star on the left-hand side If the reply answers your question then please mark as ’Mark as Accepted Solution’

Similar Messages

Issue with order or sequence of wbs elements appearance in planning layout

Hi Experts
we have an issue with order or sequence of wbs elements appearance in BPS planning layout.
In BW - 0wbs element - hierarchy order is as below
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
but when we check the same wbs element in BPS planning layout, it appears as below
1
2
3
4
6
7
5
8
Request you to advice how to correct the order.
Best Regards
krishna

Hi,
I came across a similar situation once. I dont remember exactly.
We have two different DataSources on wbs hierarchy. The hiearchy was loaded using the two datasources.
By mistake we were trying to use the hierarchy created by Datasource2, instead of hier created by datasource1.
Can you check that.

Issue with order in itunes

Good evening,
Been having an issue with the latest version of itunes and was wondering if there is a way around it. For as long as I have had my mac and itunes the listing order of artist always started with a numbered group..for example .38 Special always was the top track followed by 2Pac and 50 Cent...Now, the numbered names are at the bottom of my library list and its messed up the list in My Top Rated Playlists. I have tried clicking on the top bar in Names and it will list things from the bottom to the top but never the original way. Is there a way to fix this issue or am I stuck? Is this a recent change in itunes 7.3 because its never been like this before.
Thanks
Macbook Mac OS X (10.4.10)

Unfortunately ver. 7.3 changed the sort order of library items. Letters come first, symbol artists are classified by the first letter of their name after the symbol, number artists come last--and as I understand it pronouns such as "A" "An" "The", etc. are now totally ignored in both album and song titles.
There's not much you can do to change this--it was done to better work with the iPhone--you can only revert back to an older version of iTunes if you don't like the changes.

Can't access an agent- issues with order and installation

I had my installation for a new service today and had issues with the order. I have been trying to talk to agent after 6 hrs and I still haven't reached anyone. My order is messed up and I have a phone number with the package, but I have no clue what my number is. I need help ASAP. I'm a new comcast customer and it's already going bad. I was with Direct tv for 7 years and had no issues with them. The installation process was seamless with DTV....Comcast...not so much.

Sorry to hear about your issues with Comcast. I let a Comcast employee from the corporate office know about your issues and have requested that they reach out to you. If you don't hear from anyone soon, let me know.

Performance issue with ORDER BY

The following query runs in 60 milli sec with no order by clause. With order by it takes about 3 sec. The end result of the query is 25 records. One thing we noticed is order by is taking place after the union irrespective where we place the order by clause. Not sure how to make oracle perform order by on end result. Any thoughts truly appreciated.
SELECT *
FROM
(SELECT ROWNUM as R,
STATUS,
TASK_ID,
PRIORITY,
INSTALL_TYPE,
CUSTOMER_TYPE,
TYPE_ID,
QUEUE,
FALLOUTREASON,
START_DT,
NOTIF_CREATE_DT,
ACCT_NUM,
ADSLTN,
SDPID,
PERFORMER_DN,
SUPERVISOR_DN
FROM
(SELECT *
FROM
(SELECT *
FROM
(SELECT t.STATUS,
TASK_ID,
PRIORITY,
INSTALL_TYPE,
CUSTOMER_TYPE,
S.TYPE_ID,
QUEUE,
null FALLOUTREASON,
START_DT,
null NOTIF_CREATE_DT,
null ACCT_NUM,
ADSLTN,
null SDPID,
PERFORMER_DN,
SUPERVISOR_DN
FROM (select * from TASK_ACTIVITY where TYPE_ID='2' AND SUB_TYPE_ID='2' AND status not in ( 'Terminated','Complete') ) T,
SOEG_CRM S
WHERE t.activity_id= s.activity_id
UNION ALL
(SELECT t.STATUS,
TASK_ID,
PRIORITY,
null INSTALL_TYPE,
null CUSTOMER_TYPE,
TYPE_ID,
QUEUE,
'Review Letters for Printing' FALLOUT_REASON,
START_DT,
null NOTIF_CREATE_DT,
null ACCT_NUM,
null ADSLTN,
null SDPID,
PERFORMER_DN,
SUPERVISOR_DN
FROM (select * from TASK_ACTIVITY where TYPE_ID='3' AND status not in ( 'Terminated','Complete') ) T
UNION ALL
(SELECT t.STATUS,
TASK_ID,
PRIORITY,
INSTALL_TYPE,
CUSTOMER_TYPE,
op.TYPE_ID,
QUEUE,
FALLOUT_REASON,
START_DT,
NOTIF_CREATE_DT,
ACCT_NUM,
ADSLTN,
SDPID,
PERFORMER_DN,
SUPERVISOR_DN
FROM (select * from TASK_ACTIVITY where TYPE_ID='1' AND SUB_TYPE_ID='1' and status not in ( 'Terminated','Complete') ) T,
OPNOTES OP
WHERE t.activity_id= op.activity_id
UNION ALL
(SELECT t.STATUS,
TASK_ID,
PRIORITY,
INSTALL_TYPE,
CUSTOMER_TYPE,
a.TYPE_ID,
QUEUE,
null FALLOUTREASON,
START_DT,
null NOTIF_CREATE_DT,
null ACCT_NUM ,
ADSLTN,
null SDPID,
PERFORMER_DN,
SUPERVISOR_DN
FROM (select * from TASK_ACTIVITY where TYPE_ID='2' AND SUB_TYPE_ID='1' and status not in ( 'Terminated','Complete') ) T,
AELERA a
WHERE t.activity_id= a.activity_id
WHERE (PERFORMER_DN = 'cadmin1'
OR SUPERVISOR_DN in ('Address_Issues','PROCESSED','SG_EOSN','Test_Queue','Test_Queue_P','BUTST1','BUTST2','BU_UNAS','DATAR','PST','PST_ME','SVC','SVC_EX','SVC_ME','TEST_2_LETTER_QUEUE','TEST_2_OP_ESC_QUEUE','TEST_2_PROV_ESC_QUEUE','TEST_3','Test_4','Test_6','Test_8','test_5_LETTER_QUEUE','test_5_OP_ESC_QUEUE','test_5_PROV_ESC_QUEUE','cadmin1'))
AND ((STATUS = 'Pending'
AND PERFORMER_DN = QUEUE)
OR STATUS = 'Suspended'
OR STATUS = 'Acquired'
OR (STATUS = 'Pending'
AND PERFORMER_DN <> QUEUE))
AND (TYPE_ID = '2'
OR TYPE_ID = '3')
--order by priority
WHERE R >= 1
and R < 26
--order by priority
Here is the explain plan
19 SELECT STATEMENT
18 . VIEW
17 SORT [ORDER BY]
16 COUNT
15 . VIEW
14 UNION-ALL
4 NESTED LOOPS
1 APPL.TASK_ACTIVITY TABLE ACCESS [FULL]
3 APPL.SOEG_CRM TABLE ACCESS [BY INDEX ROWID]
2 APPL.XPK_SOEG_CRM INDEX [UNIQUE SCAN]
5 APPL.TASK_ACTIVITY TABLE ACCESS [FULL]
9 NESTED LOOPS
6 APPL.BSOMS_OPNOTES TABLE ACCESS [FULL]
8 APPL.TASK_ACTIVITY TABLE ACCESS [BY INDEX ROWID]
7 APPL.XPKTASK_ACTIVITY INDEX [UNIQUE SCAN]
13 NESTED LOOPS
10 APPL.TASK_ACTIVITY TABLE ACCESS [FULL]
12 APPL.AELERA TABLE ACCESS [BY INDEX ROWID]
11 APPL.XPK_AELERA INDEX [UNIQUE SCAN]

Hi,
I must admit, that I didn't read your whole query, but did you try to use a subselect?
Select a.* from (your_query) a
order by a.priorityBTW: Don't use SELECT *
Dim

Composite Web form - Issue with Ordering of dimensions in page section

Hi,
I have 2 simple web-forms having same dimensions in page section and in same order. When I create the compisite web form with these 2 simple webforms and view the same, it come in different order.
Is there any way to get the dimensions in required order / or any solution to this.
Thanks and Regards,
VM
Edited by: VM on Nov 10, 2010 12:35 AM

Hi,
What version are you using ?
Regards

SQL Query : Order By issue with HUGE Table

Hello friends,
I have been through a terrible issue with order by. I would appreciate your help. Please let me know, your input for my case:
=> if i run select query it returns result quick in some milliseconds. (sql dev. fetches 50 rows at a time)
=> if i run select query with where condition and column (say A) in where condition is even indexed and i have order by and that order by column (say B) is also indexed.
Now, here is the issue:
1. if no. of rows with that where condition can filter yielding small result set then order by works fine .. 1-5 sec which is good.
2.*if no. of rows with that where condition can filter yielding Large result set, say more than 50,000 then with order by then the wait time is exponential.... i have even waited 10+ mins to get the result back for 120,000 records.*
Is order by takes that long for 100K records ... i think something else if wrong... your pointer will really be helpful... i am very new to sql and even newer for large table case.
I am using SQL Developer Version 2.1.1.64
and Oracle Database 11g Enterprise Edition Release 11.1.0.7.0 - 64bit Production
Thank you so much.
Edited by: 896719 on Jan 11, 2013 8:38 AM

Yes you are correct, but my concentration was on order by thing, so it will do full scan of table so i was putting that ... and was also wondering if millions of record in table should not be a issue...???
Any way for the explain plan , when just a value in the where changes there is the huge difference i want to point out too as below:
SELECT
FROM
    EES_EVT EES_EVT where APLC_EVT_CD= 'ABC' ORDER BY CRE_DTTM DESC
execution time : 0.047 sec
Plan hash value: 290548126
| Id | Operation                    | Name        | Rows | Bytes | Cost (%CPU)| Time     |
|   0 | SELECT STATEMENT             |             |    27 | 14688 |    25   (4)| 00:00:01 |
|   1 | SORT ORDER BY               |             |    27 | 14688 |    25   (4)| 00:00:01 |
|   2 |   TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID| EES_EVT     |    27 | 14688 |    24   (0)| 00:00:01 |
|* 3 |    INDEX RANGE SCAN          | XIE1EES_EVT |    27 |       |     4   (0)| 00:00:01 |
Predicate Information (identified by operation id):
   3 - access("APLC_EVT_CD"='ABC')
Note
   - SQL plan baseline "SYS_SQL_PLAN_6d41e6b91925c463" used for this statement
=============================================================================================
SELECT
FROM
    EES_EVT EES_EVT where APLC_EVT_CD= 'XYZ' ORDER BY CRE_DTTM DESC
execution : 898.672 sec.
Plan hash value: 290548126
| Id | Operation                    | Name        | Rows | Bytes |TempSpc| Cost (%CPU)| Time     |
|   0 | SELECT STATEMENT             |             |   121K|    62M|       |   102K (1)| 00:11:02 |
|   1 | SORT ORDER BY               |             |   121K|    62M|    72M|   102K (1)| 00:11:02 |
|   2 |   TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID| EES_EVT     |   121K|    62M|       | 88028   (1)| 00:09:27 |
|* 3 |    INDEX RANGE SCAN          | XIE1EES_EVT |   121K|       |       |   689   (1)| 00:00:05 |
Predicate Information (identified by operation id):
   3 - access("APLC_EVT_CD"='XYZ')
Note
   - SQL plan baseline "SYS_SQL_PLAN_ef5709641925c463" used for this statementAlso Note this table contains 74328 MB data in it.
Thanks

Oracle query tuning : query with Order-by clause

Hi
I am having a query in my database :
SELECT * FROM SAPR3.HRP1001 WHERE "MANDT" = 990
ORDER BY
"MANDT" , "OTYPE" , "OBJID" , "PLVAR" , "RSIGN" , "RELAT" , "ISTAT" , "PRIOX" , "BEGDA" , "ENDDA" ,"VARYF" , "SEQNR" ;
Autotrace output is :
Execution Plan
0 SELECT STATEMENT Optimizer=CHOOSE (Cost=4649 Card=171895 Byt
es=22862035)
1 0 SORT (ORDER BY) (Cost=4649 Card=171895 Bytes=22862035)
2 1 TABLE ACCESS (FULL) OF 'HRP1001' (Cost=1170 Card=171895
Bytes=22862035)
Statistics
0 recursive calls
5 db block gets
12157 consistent gets
11543 physical reads
0 redo size
38253080 bytes sent via SQL*Net to client
376841 bytes received via SQL*Net from client
34201 SQL*Net roundtrips to/from client
0 sorts (memory)
1 sorts (disk)
512992 rows processed
Since it is a issue with order by , it seems a PGA memory issue. there is 12GB PGA available but only 3GB gets allocated. pga_aggregate target is set in the DB. There is a index created for al the columns on order by, but it is not getting used.
pleas suggest me as I am running into major problems, i can post the output of any query u require from my side. Any help wil be highly apprciated.
Rishi

> The query was alwasy spilling over to the One-Parse execution . It can be seen thru ST04N ->resource consumption-> sql work area trace.
>
> An undocumented oracle parameter smmmax_size was set which allowed for more usage of physical memory by single process and there was no spillover to the TEMP tablespaces.
>
> Also the File read time was analysed from Unix level ( From SAP thru ST04 ->filesystem wait s-> Avg rd (ms) and Ang writes (ms) which showed that reading from the File was not happening well. )
Hi Rishi,
the provided execution statistics prove the opposite:
>Statistics
>...
>0 sorts (memory)
> 1 sorts (disk)
>512992 rows processed
This indeed was a single-pass sort, which means it had to use the temp tablespace for one pass of the sorting/grouping.
Remember that Oracle distinguishes three kinds of sorts: 1. "in memory", 2. "single-pass" and 3. "multi-pass".
Only the first one won't need to spill out data to the disks. The others do this by definition.
BTW: the file read times in ST04 are aquired through Oracle V$ views and not directly from the OS - that can make a big difference sometimes.
regards,
Lars

Issue with RTL order in hyperlinks on Pages 5.2

Hello,
I am having an issue with the Arabic order when trying to add a hyperlink to a text in Pages 5.2. When I type the sentence without the hyperlink the order is perfect, however when I add the the URL link to the selected text the sentence order becomes corrupted.
Could you please let me know if there is some feature that I am missing to apply or is just that the RTL support on Pages 5.2 is not very good?
Do you have a workaround to this problem?
So far the only way to solve it that I found it was to create a transparent text box with the link over the sentence. However I would like to found a better solution to this.
Screenshots for reference:
Correct order without link.
Incorrect order with link
Thanks in advance for your time and help.
Leo

negative101 wrote:
Unfortunately I need to work on Pages 5.2 due to client requeriments. And also like you mention playing with the Text Direction is does not work since it change the whole paragraph direction and not just a specific selection.
You client insists on .pages format?
See this for other potential options regarding text direction:
http://support.apple.com/kb/PH14203

ISSUE WITH SERVICE PURCHASE ORDER STATUS

Hi
There is an issue with a Service PO.When I created a service p.o the
p.o value was 1,543,695.60 USD . I created service entry sheet and GR
for 1,029,130.40 USD.
The still to be delivered amount should be 1,543,695.60-1,029,130.40 =514565.20 USD
But the Amount Still to be delivered in p.o STATUS HEADER DATA screen shows 191,761.60 USD.
Actually the system should show the delivered status as 514565.20 USD.
What should be the cause for this???
I checked the invoice also.Invoicing is done for 1,029,130.40 USD.
Apperciate ur immediate feedback on this.

Hi
S012 is updated by the Purchase Order creation date, not the Goods Receipt date. e.g. a Purchase Order is created in January and good receipt is in February and March, S012 will shows the values in period January.
try Transaction MC26
Info structure S012 Update group (stats) SAP
Double click on Goods received qty
In the section Date field for period determination
check regarding date or change accordingly
hope it helps.

Production Order Issue with Qty conflict

Hi Friends,
i have a issue with a production order fro which we built the product and the finished goods is moved to storage location, i have status set on my Production order as REL PRT CNF DLV PRC GMPS MACM SETC. My order was for 1unit,In the quantities window , total qty shows as 1 pc and delivered as nothing (blank). Its not active were physically i can change , so how do i add the deliverd qty field by 1.And what could be the issue? PLS help Points will be rewarded.

This Delivered field in CO02-Dates/Qtys tab will get updated automatically , when the order qty is delivered to stock.
We can not manually update that.
Have you checked whether the storage location stock has been increased ? In MMBE , you place the cursor on the stock qty and choose Environment - Production orders or Material Movements and check , whether a GR has been made against this order.
Regards,
Sheik

Issue with sales order stock that is referencing a non-existing sales order

We have an issue with sale order stock.
Due to user error we have ended up with a negative quant of sales order stock in a bin. Further the error was due to mis-keying of sales order number. Hence this negative quant is referencing a sales order that does not exist.
We need to get rid of this quant.
I thought of cycling this quant off as a solution. And hence replicated the scenario in the test system. I was able to create a TO to cycle it off but cannot clear the differences from 999 . The error I get while trying to do this is "SD document not in database or has been archived" . This error is true since the sales order actually does not exist. So cycling it off did not work.
Can anyone suggest how we can get rid of this negative quant of sales order stock ?
Thanks

Hi,
You said that your user mistyped the SO number and it resulted in a -quant. In which transaction was it possible? If I give a non existing no. SAP doesn't allow me to book.
If I were you I would check both in WM & IM what the user had done...step-by-step...
Negative quant comes to existance in interim storage type if we book e.g. a GI. It should have started in IM...how was your user be able to do that??? If it was possible cannot you reverse the IM booking?
(...if all else fails...cannot you create a SO document with external number assignment with the same number?...)
BR
Csaba
Edited by: Csaba Szommer on Jun 24, 2008 8:31 PM

Issue with Serial number inheritance in PP order

Hi gurus,
We have an issue with inheritaning component material serial no. to header material.
For production order having different header material and component material,on GI, the serial no. assigned to component is inheritated to header material. We can see the serial nos. in order, Header --> Serails Numbers. This functionality has been implemented in BADI 'MB_MIGO_BADI' method POST_DOCUMENT' using FM 'SERNR_ADD_TO_DOCUMENT'.
But, the issue is when the production order is having same header and component material. And on GI, the serial no. is not getting inherited into header material ie., the serial nos. are not visible in production order ,Header --> Serial Number.
Is there any other FM for handling the serial numbers for order having having same header and component material?
Note: The material is serialized material.
Thanks & Regards,
Chandra Sekhar.

Tried the "live" chat. What a waste of time:
Thank you for choosing Adobe. A representative will be with you shortly. Your estimated wait time is 0 minute(s) and 54 second(s) or longer as there are 1 customer(s) in line ahead of you.
You are now chatting with Farook.
Farook: Hello! Welcome to Adobe Customer Service.
Farook: Please allow me a moment to review your request.
Farook: Hi Martin.
Martin: Hi.
Martin: For reference the serial number is <deleted>
Martin: Purchased from Amazon.co.uk in January.
Farook: I understand that you are unable to install the software. Am I correct?
Martin: No. I installed it, activated it fine on my laptop but when I tried to do the same on my desktop PC the serial number conflictr was detected and both are now blocked.
Martin: Farook, I suspect you won't find this in your FAQs, since it isn't on the support website. Can you escalate?
Farook: I am sorry to hear that.
Farook: Can I have your full name and email address?
Martin: Martin Lampard
Martin: <deleted>
Farook: Thank you.
Farook: Martin, I am sorry, the serial number which you have provided has not registered with.
Farook: Hence, you need to contact Amazon.
Martin: Rubbish. I had activated it on my laptop. I am 100% certain.
Farook: I understand Martin.
Martin: How did you check the serial number?
Farook: Could you please re-confirm me the serial number?
Martin: <deleted>
Farook: Thank you.
Farook: Martin, I am sorry, you need to contact Amazon.com.
Farook: I am sorry for the inconvenience caused to you.
Martin: Why? They sold me a working copy of Dreamweaver.
Farook: I understand, but I do not have enough resources to help you further.
Farook: Please contact Amazon.com.
Martin: What a waste of time. Makes me sorry I bought this Adobe product.

Goods Issue with reference to Purchase Order

Hi MM Gurus,
Is there any settings to do Goods Issue with reference to Purchase order?
I want to capture the material price in purchase order during goods issue instead of standard price or moving average price.
Thanks in advance
Dinesh

Hello Dinesh,
Batch valuation is similar to split valuation. Here is the link on how batch valuation works.
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_47x200/helpdata/en/25/283db54f7811d18a150000e816ae6e/content.htm
Please check in sandbox environment before using.
Hope this helps.
Regards
Arif Mansuri

ERP Sales Order : Performance issues with Product Proposal

Hi
we are working on CRM 2007 solution and are facing serious performance issues with the ERP Sales Order functionality provided in the ICWC of this version.
In our development we are adding items in the ERP cart as soon as the user clicks on the 'New Sales Order' button of the sales order sreen. We get the items by very simple and optimized call to the ERP system and then add these entities in the Item Cart (Item collection ...in simple sense).
For adding 10 items the application takes 10 seconds and this is too much for adding just 10 items.
Can you please provide any Notes/alternative solution to resolve this issue.
Regards
Ajitabh

Hi Ajithabh,
Please apply the following SAP notes:
1061423 - Interaction Center ERP Order Performance improvement
1262277 - Performance: CRM value help causes dumps in ERP
1292817 - Performance: Reduce RFC calls during creation of ERP order.
1319885 - ERP sales order search with external reference
1326527 - Reducing number of RFC calls in IC ERP Sales Order
I hope it helps!
Regards,
Gabriel Santana

Issues with Ordering

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for