Item deletion when a subsequent document exists

Hello everybody,
When I create a quotation Y in reference to another quotation X, it is impossible to delete à line in the quotation X.
The system displays an error message "Item 000020 cannot be deleted because of subsequent document Y".
Is there a mean to allow the deletion of an item in a sales document when a subsequent document exists?
Can we manage this issue through customizing?
Thank you in advance for your answers?
Christophe

Is there a mean to allow the deletion of an item
  in a sales document when a subsequent
     document exists?
No if there is a subsequent document for a particular line item in sale order, you cannot delete that line item.
thanks
G. Lakshmipathi

Similar Messages

  • Shoping cart deletion when follow-on document deleted

    Hi Experts,
    it is not possible to delete a SC when the follow-on is deleted - the deletion button is deactivated. The SC is in status I1115 Follow-on Document Deleted, is there any way we can delete the SC?
    Thanks for your help.
    Tomas

    It should be not possible to delete SC when there was a follow on
    document was created in the backend, even if the PO was deleted.
    Because of  performance reasons and because the items on one SC can
    result in different backend purchase orders this is standard behavior.
    Is possible that when you delete the follow on document the SC goes to
    the sourcing.
    You should be able to delete a SC where no follow on object was created
    in the backend.

  • Delivery item deleted when quantity is zero

    Hello Experts,
    I have created a z program in which I'm doing a call transaction to VL02n.
    I'm modifying quantity to 0. My problem is that the item is deleted when quantity is zero.
    I have checked the forum and have seen that transaction 0vlp has the configuration for that. Is that correct?
    Do you know any configuration to keep zero line items after using vl02n?
    Thanks in advance!
    Emanuel

    I have checked the forum and have seen that transaction 0vlp has the configuration for that. Is that correct?
    This is correct. Keep the value blank for the field Check quantity 0 and then test again.
    Regards,

  • PO line items delete after GRN

    Hi Experts,
    In any PO if I have done GRN its line items should not be deleted. Means afrer grn po should not be delete only lock and delivery complete indicatior active . If any message is ther please suggest me
    Pooja

    Hi Pooja,
    Standard SAP doesn't allow you to delete the PO line item once you post the GR.  Only after posting the IR for the full quantity of GR, then only system allows you to delete the line item.  If IR is posted for a partial quantity of GR, then system expects a GR/IR clearing document.
    I had a similar requirement like you, once there is a subsequent posting like GR and IR users should not be allowed to delete the line item unless the documents are fully reversed.
    I used the Badi ME_PROCESS_PO_CUST -> method PROCESS_ITEM for this purpose and developed a custom enhancement.  If user deleted any line item, system checks for subsequent document and if any document exists it will throw error message.
    You can also build enhancement similarly.
    This enhancement will not impact the Archiving process.  Archiving program directly updates the deletion indicator at table level.
    Rgds, Mallik
    Edited by: mallik on Dec 28, 2009 1:37 PM

  • MV45:  Change subsequent documents

    Hi all,
    I´m trying to update an order created with reference to an contract whenever the contract itself is changed.
    Obviously the system locks all orders as long as the contract is being processed, therefore I cannot make those changes within an UserExit... at least none of the ones I know. (save, save_prepare)
    Is there any other way to change subsequent sales documents, or is there another Exit which is reached after the documents are dequeued?

    Hi,
    Deleting a sales order is not a good practice.As suggested by other friend maintain the reason for rejection.
    Again in future if you want to process that deleted order,you have get it from SARA etc.. which is a cumbursome process.
    You are telling that in some cases,you are able to delete the order because in those cases,all your subsequent documents are deleted/cancelled/reversed.
    So you are able to delete that order.For other cases please delete all the subsequent documents.
    There is no other setting to control this function.
    Regards,
    Krishna.

  • When deleting messages I get this message:"74608.emlx" couldn't be copied to "Messages" because an item with the same name already exists.  How can I fix this problem?

    When trying to delete messages in mail, I've been getting this message:“74608.emlx” couldn’t be copied to “Messages” because an item with the same name already exists."  The numbers at the beginning are always different but the ".emlx" and the rest of the statement is always the same.  How can I fix this problem?
    Thanks
    Candy777

    HT2500 Error when deleting email: Apple Support Communities

  • Subsequent documents already exist for item - information message

    Hi All,
    Once a sales order item is rejected post creation of subsequent document, the information message in quetion appears for every item repeatedly.
    I have cases were there are thousands of items (in RRB billing drafts for instance), and the reason for rejection is set via the menu: Edit --> Fast Change Of --> Reason For Rejection. The problem is that the message pops-up for every item separately and the users are obliged to press Enter thousands of times.
    Is there any solution for disabling this message under defined circumstances?
    Appreciate your assistance.
    Amit

    Hello,
    Once a sales order item is rejected post creation of subsequent document,
    the information message in quetion appears for every item repeatedly. I have
    cases were there are thousands of items (in RRB billing drafts for instance),
    and the reason for rejection is set via the menu: Edit --> Fast Change Of -->
    Reason For Rejection. The problem is that the message pops-up for every item
    separately and the users are obliged to press Enter thousands of times.
    My suggestion would be why not reject the Sales Order at Header Level. The second option will be try out the transaction code "MASS" and for any list of Sales Order, you can easily reject at a single shot !!
    Regards,
    Sarthak

  • How can i remove items from list that have been deleted when i click on them it keeps showing empty

    how can i remove items from the list that have been deleted when i click on them it keeps showing folder empty

    Actually, Reader SHOULD keep showing documents that no longer exist, I disagree. It's no big deal, and people will quickly realise why they can't open the file. They open more files, the old ones move off.
    The REASON why it should not check is that checking whether a file exists can take a long time when things aren't good. For instance if a file server goes down, or a memory card is unplugged. That in turn would mean delays opening the File menu, and I've seen some software that can sit there for several minutes. That would really give people something of which to complain...

  • HT5767 My mail all of a sudden would not allow me to delete messages in my inbox saying, "couldn't be copied to "Messages" because an item with the same name already exists." Found it duplicates the message I wanted deleted in trash.

    Still  using the @mac.com   mail  address and up   to date on everything, but have not gone to Maverick.  All of a sudden Mail wouldn't let me delete.  Said that title of email was already in trash.  And sure enough it was.  Clicking on the help button on the message gets Nothing.
    The selected topic is currently unavailable.
    The topic you were trying to view could not be found.
    "couldn’t be copied to “Messages” because an item with the same name already exists."
    Any ideas.  My mail is not tied to gmail etc.. just all by it's lonesome.

    Please read this whole message before doing anything.
    This procedure is a diagnostic test. It’s unlikely to solve your problem. Don’t be disappointed when you find that nothing has changed after you complete it.
    The purpose of the test is to determine whether the problem is caused by third-party software that loads automatically at startup or login, by a peripheral device, or by corruption of certain system caches. 
    Disconnect all wired peripherals except those needed for the test, and remove all aftermarket expansion cards. Boot in safe mode and log in to the account with the problem. Note: If FileVault is enabled on some models, or if a firmware password is set, or if the boot volume is a software RAID, you can’t do this. Ask for further instructions.
    Safe mode is much slower to boot and run than normal, and some things won’t work at all, including sound output and  Wi-Fi on certain iMacs. The next normal boot may also be somewhat slow.
    The login screen appears even if you usually log in automatically. You must know your login password in order to log in. If you’ve forgotten the password, you will need to reset it before you begin. Test while in safe mode. Same problem? After testing, reboot as usual (i.e., not in safe mode) and verify that you still have the problem. Post the results of the test.

  • Document Library items delete

    Hi ,
    I have a Document Library. I created one custom view through code.
    in that, i need to show a DELETE option. i already did that.
    Question is, only document owners only should have the right to delete those doc's. Others should not delete.
    For a list, we have ITEM LEVEL PERMISSION option. Like that , is there any way to achieve  that?
    How to do that.?

    Hello,
    Just create a designer workflow for  your requirement.
    Execute that workflow when an new document gets added under library.
    The functionality of the workflow is as follows
    When a new document get added, you workflow will set contribute access to the owner of that document and will set read access to rest all other users.

  • Purchasing Groups deleted: Errors when processing related documents

    Hi Gurus,
    We are on SRM 7 and we are currently facing an issue when processing documents which Purchasing Groups have been deleted after thee procurement documents were created
    In our case, when a PGroups is deleted and unassigned, an interfase from HR is raised and i the SRM PPOMA the Pgroup is not valid anymore and unassigned from the Purchasing Organization.
    Once this happens, we face a blocking issue for all the documents created with Purchasing Groups that has been deleted.
    These documents cannot be processed anymore and and error saying that Purchasing group is not assigned to purchasing organization... is raised.
    Currently we are manually mantaining the validity of the Purchasing Group via PPOMA and transaction PP01. We put the validity to unlimited and the documents can be processed again.
    Anyway we would like to avoid this manual update and to have a false information in te system where the PGroup will be shown as valid while it has been deleted in the past.
    Could you please advise on the best solution on it?
    Many Thanks in advance.
    Best Regards,
    Valentino

    Thank you both for your responses and my apologies on my delayed response.
    I have this POA set to run the indexing continuously, so it's generating large logs.
    From the log entries, it looks as if the indexing process repeats itself anywhere from 30 minutes to an hour.
    I base this on when I see the log repeating the userxxx.db file names.
    When I look at the information for my single post office, it shows 559 users, 126 resources and a total mailbox count of 565.
    I'm not sure how that all works out.
    To answer your questions, Laura:
    The logs show the error in relation to 527 out of 559 userxxx.db files.
    There are 181 userxxx.db and 24 files with names like pu3a0101.db that do not return an 8210 error. All of those files consistently show a zero count after the index process, e.g., Updating QuickFinder index: userxxx.db (0).
    The error or lack of error is consistent. It occurs on the same 527 files and does not occur on the same 181 files every time.
    The one clue I've found to the puxx0101.db files was a forum post from back in 2006, where Dave Parkes identifies them as being associated with shared folders.
    To answer your question, Howard:
    I have a fair number of users with large attachments and high item counts, but nowhere near what I'm am seeing the 8210 errors on.

  • IDCS3 When adding a document to a book, the text frame of the subsequent documents in the book moves

    Hi
    I've been working on a 700 or so book containing about 115 documents. These book's documents consist of a main text frame and I've been adding them gradually to the book document. The problem is whenever I add a document to the book or change the order of the documents, the main text frame of the subsequent documents in the book moves on its x axis even when it is locked. To correct the problem I've been moving them to their original place manually but this is a real chaos. Moreover I've noticed that not every text frame in a document moves but most of them does. I don't know what is causing the problem so either don't know how to solve it. I would like to prevent this from happening again cause I've got to add more documents to the book. Can anybody help?

    truncated mail continuation...
    (getDocument is exactly the same as in XML Database
    Developer's Guide - Oracle XML DB Release 2 (9.2))
    I get:
    SQL> INSERT INTO items VALUES (XMLTYPE(getDocument('items1.xml')));
    INSERT INTO items VALUES (XMLTYPE(getDocument('items1.xml')))
    ERROR at line 1:
    ORA-19007: Schema and element do not match
    Do you know which is the problem?
    I have proved changing the headers of the xml document
    and schema in severals way, but it doesn't work.
    Could be a problem with Oracle configuration?
    Thanks in advance,
    Mario Barcala

  • Cannot delete read mail. Keep getting the following message "926540.emlx" couldn't be copied to "Messages" because an item with the same name already exists.

    I am trying to free up room on my hard drive but keep getting the following message. “926540.emlx” couldn’t be copied to “Messages” because an item with the same name already exists. 926540.emix is the number given to the email I want to delete. This message appears (with a different .emix number) when I try to delete any mail. I have junk mail from 2014 to 2009 that I want to delete

    Back up all data. Rebuild the mailbox. Try again to delete the message.

  • Pages 5.5.1: When opening a document created with Pages '09 (Version 4.0) with Pages 5.5.1 the page header and the page footer are deleted. How can this be prevented? Or is this a bug in Pages 5.5.1?

    Pages 5.5.1: When opening a document created with Pages '09 (Version 4.0) with Pages 5.5.1 the page header and the page footer are deleted. How can this be prevented? Or is this a bug in Pages 5.5.1?

    Same problem here (no graphics in header or footer) and the problem has been reported months ago. It is another bug/feature lost when Apple moves from 09 to the iCloud-compatible versions.  Complain to Apple, you may have better chance than me and they may finally listen to their users....

  • APP-PAY-07201 Cannot perform a delete when child record exists in future

    I am trying to put end date to a payment method of any employee in HR/Payroll 11.5.10.2
    but receiving the following error message:
    APP-PAY-07201 Cannot perform a delete when child record exists in future
    Can u advise what steps I should follow to resolve this issue.
    Regards /Ali

    This note is related to termination of employee while our employee is on payroll and just want to change is payment method. But in the presence of existing payment method we cannot attched another becuase we are receiving an error:
    APP-PAY-07041: Priority must be unique within an orgainzational payment method

Maybe you are looking for