Items uploading (with g/l accounts by item level) through DTW

Dear All,
how to upload 1000 items with 400 warehouses with different item level g/l account determination for each item in warehouses through DTW.
is it possible through DTW ,but not using copy express.if there any solution please suggest me.
thanks
komanduri.

Hi Komanduri.....
Yes it is possible to transfer those details by DTW.
What all you need to do is you have to fill template for OITM and OITW_ItemWareHouseInfo.
Put Set GL Method o=in OITM template as on Item level and fill the necessary GL accounts in OITW_ItemWarehosueInfo Template.....
Hope this will work for you.........
Regards,
Rahul

Similar Messages

How to import Symbocic Character in Items Code through DTW

Dear all
My client maintained their Item code as Alphanumeric with Symbolic character example-(Item Code Like 375-1802041-Б2, 375-1802041-2u03A0, 375-1802041-Б2, 375-1802041-Ж and 375-1802041-я).
The problem is when I import this codes through DTW using CSV format the all Symbolic character are automatically convert to u2018?u2019 and the Data import was failed the message show u201C invalid Item Codeu201D.
Then how to import this item codes in SAP B1 through DTW.
Please help me to solve above problem.
Thanks
Subhas Pal

It is better if you just use standard ASCII characters for Item Code. Think about website address, will you use those special characters?
You may try to put those special codes to part of item description field if you can.
To replace those symbols, you may use number to get one-to-one mapping. Such as Ж = 16, Я = 42
Thanks,
Gordon

Remove Item from Item list through DTW

Hi Experts,
Please do the needful for the below issues.
1.System is not allow partial delivery but I already activate allow partial delivery at sales order logistic tab.
2.System is allow to print the document at client place automatically at the time of the creation of the sales quotation but not at server.
3.How to remove Item code from the DB with the help of the DTW.

hi,
If there is no transactions associated with item,
Open item in item master data,From menu bar,Select Data ---> Remove.
for other cases refer Note 1163367 - How can obsolete items be managed in SAP Business One?
[https://websmp230.sap-ag.de/sap(bD1lbiZjPTAwMQ==)/bc/bsp/spn/sapnotes/index2.htm?numm=1163367]
Jeyakanthan

Needs to be added one field in VL01n in ITEM level. Please. Quick answer!

Hi Experts,
I need to add one field in "Loading and shipment" Tab in ITEM level.
Is there any screen exit or BADI to achieve it.
I got one BADI LE_SHP_TAB_CUST_ITEM. But while checking in my system through SE18/SE19, I am getting message like Does not exist".
If i want to use this badi, will i crate it in my system by giving definition name??
If i created this, can I add one field in "Loading and shipment" Tab in ITEM level through this BADI.
Please advice on it as soon as possible BCZ, it is very urgent requirement.
More rewards will be given for quick advice.
Thanks
Kumar.

Are you using SAP 46C? This BADI is not in 46C..
You cannot create BADI with this name, because there is not code in SAP standard program for triggering this BADI.
If anything can be done, it can be done in SPRO(customizing) or you have to modify the standard screen.
Rgds
Bhavani.

VA42 user exit to update contract start and end dates at Item level

Hi Experts,
                  I need to update contract start and end dates at Item level in 'VA42' transaction, for this i am using user-exit 'USEREXIT_FIELD_MODIFICATION' in the include 'MV45AFZZ'. i am able to display the data into item level through my coding but the data is not getting updated into 'VEDA'
Note: No need to change contract start date and end date in header level. Only at item level i want to change dates.
Thanks,
Sateesh.

Thanks For your reply Vikram,
      i tried with 'USEREXIT_MOVE_FIELD_TO_VBAP' user-exit earlier it self its not working. Can you suggest me any another way how we can achieve this functionality. modification of Contract start date and end date in only item level.
'USEREXIT_MOVE_FIELD_TO_VBAP':
FORM USEREXIT_MOVE_FIELD_TO_VBAP.
"""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""$"$\SE:(3) Form USEREXIT_MOVE_FIELD_TO_VBAP, Start                                                                                                           A
*$*$-Start: (3)---------------------------------------------------------------------------------$*$*
ENHANCEMENT 1 ZSD_CONT_DATE.    "active version
DATA : lv_var TYPE CHAR10.
lv_var = '0040000219'.
if sy-tcode = 'VA42'.
IF VBAK-VBELN EQ lv_var.
VEDA-VBEGDAT = '20140502'.
XVEDA-UPDKZ = 'X'.
VEDA-VENDDAT = '20140602'.
XVEDA-UPDKZ = 'X'.
ENDIF.
ENDIF.
ENDENHANCEMENT.

Mass change through CS20 at sub item level

Hi,
Can we change BOM at sub item level through CS20.
If any input pl. provide..
Regards
Tushar

Hi,
You can not change the sub items of BOM through CS20.
Only item details can be changed here.
Thanks
SISL !!

Clearing a open item with two bank accounts at a time

anybody answer the below question please
how can clear the vendor line item using two bank accounts at a time

hi Samala,
you can do it manually in F-53, enter a bank account with amount, than enter vendor number, and click to select open items. Here don't select any open item, but click on Overview. Now you should see the item with the bank account you already entered, on the bottom of the screen you can enter a new line now, with another bank account, when it is done, you can click on process open items again, select, simulate, post, ...
hope this helps
ec

New downloads of items already purchased in other device with the same account are charged again?

New downloads of items already purchased in other device with the same account are charged again?

No, see here...
Download Past Purchases
http://support.apple.com/kb/HT2519
Log into iTunes using the account the Purchase was made with... Click on Buy... and a notice will come up saying you already have it... do you wish to download it again... Click Yes...

Item level security not available to accounts with manage content?

Though I'd post this here before trying metalink.
Environment: App Server Portal 9.0.4 (10g) on Win200
The scenario:
I have set up a page with one item area. This is set to be a portlet on another page and act as a message board.
I wish to set up a group of users to maintain this message board, but restrict their access any further.
Setting a user up with 'Manage Content' on the Page properties almost does this. It allows them to Enter/Edit/Move or delete items but pretty much no more which is exactly the level of access I require.
What it doesn't allow, when they add or edit an Item, is the ability to change Access permissions.
The page has 'item level security' ticked, and a user with higher 'Manage' access can set access permissions on items, for example only allowing a certain group viewing an item, but it also allows them to manipulate the page which I do not want to permit.
Is it possible that 'Manage Content' level users can also set access on items?
Thanks.

Resolved, it appears that access can be set after item creation using the edit. a little quirk.
Also I was trying to set access on an item created by the 'manage' user, which was beyond the 'manage content' users scope, and not a practical situation.

How to fill Long Text in Accounting document in the item level.

Hi,
I need to fill Long Text field in item level of accounting document from the header texts from Billing header(say billing instructions)
I checked the user exit EXIT_SAPLV60B_008 but it didnt worked in my case. I have read the billing instructions in the Billing header using FM READ_TEXT but I am not able to save this text using FM SAVE_TEXT because for the field Long Text the parameter TDNAME is a concatenation of BUKRS(COmpany code) BELNR(Accounting doc. no.) GHAJR(fiscal year) BUZEI(line item) .
But I am not able to capture this accounting doc. number in the mentioned user exit instead I am getting Sales Invoice number and hence not able to give TDNAME parameter for FM save_text.

Hi Amit,
In application area FINANCIAL ACCOUNTING , go for node LINE ITEM. Here create a step & maintain the prerequisite as per your requirement & in the check you can mention the code or you can direct it to a custom program like ZFI_RGGBR000.
Here while maintaining the check you will get structures BKPF & BSEG in which you will get the desired field you are looking for.
Just try to explore in your system how the other validations are maintained.
After you are done with all your code, you have to run the regeneration program RGUGBR00.
Here utmost care should be taken while running regeneration program, you should select all the checkboxes in the selection screen except GENERATE SETS, GEN SUBSTN ROUTNS IN ALL CLNTS & TRACE PROG. GENERATE CALLS .
Hope this make your doubt clear.
Regards
Abhii

Account Assignment Gp. Change in Sales Order At Item Level

Due to Some Changes in Material Account Assignment Gps. , I want to Change A/C Assignment Gps. at Item Level in the Sales order it self . as there are so many pending sales orders with Old A/C assignment gp. I tried through MASS updation , but Item level A/C assignment field is not avialable . Pl. help to solve this matter

Dear,
       I explain you the process that where the actual field is this.
      First Go on T.Code MASS --> Select Object Type : BUS2032 ---> F8 (Execute) --> Select SD document: Business item data : Table Name :MASSSDPOSVBKD ---> F8 (Execute) -- > Choose Selection Field (Square Check Button at Footer) ---> Select AcctAssgGr Field from Pool to Selection criteria --> Select OK.
      Hope it will help you.
Regards,
Sandip

GL Account details at the header are not flowing to the item level in SC

Hi All,
While creating a Shopping Cart, first I am specifying the cost assignment details (i.e., Cost Center, GL Account) in the header and then creating the line items for the shopping Cart.
While creating these line items, the cost center which is specified in the header is populated at the line item, but GL Account is blank.
I need to populate the same GL Account at each line item.
I checked the badi: BBP_DETERMINE_ACCT to populate the GL account for line items. But I am unable to determine this header GL Account in this badi.
Can anybody help me in this regard, thanks in advance.
Regards
Loknath

Hi
The purpose of the BADI - BBP_DETERMINE_ACCT is to deal with Shopping cart - Item level data, there it contains only two tables
ITEM_DATA
This contains the most important item data for the shopping cart.
ACCT_DATA
This contains the account assignment data for the shopping cart item.
Here is the documentation.
BBP_DETERMINE_ACCT
You can use the Business Add-In BBP_DETERMINE_ACCT to specify your own criteria for determining the G/L account.
In the standard system, the G/L account is determined using the product category and the account assignment type, refer to Define G/L Account for Product Category and Account Assignment Category.
The G/L account is then placed in field ACCT_DATA-G_L_ACCT. Then, the system calls the Business Add-In BBP_DTERMINE_ACCT.
In method DETERMINE_ACCOUNT, two table parameters are available:
ITEM_DATA
This contains the most important item data for the shopping cart.
ACCT_DATA
This contains the account assignment data for the shopping cart item.
This means that you can now determine the G/L account irrespective of other item data (or any combination of item data) and overwrite field ACCT_DATA-G_L_ACCT.
Example
For the product category OFFICE SUPPLIES in conjunction with account assignment type CC (cost center), the system determines G/L account 400000. However, you also want to take into account the company code (field ITEM_DATA-CO_CODE) when determining the G/L account. The system is to make postings to G/L account 410000 for company code 0002. So you overwrite field ACCT_DATA-G_L_ACCT with 410000.
I recommend, In future, Please read the relevant documetation of any of the BADIs in SE18 Transaction, before implemnting the same, to get the details.
Hope this will help.
Please reward suitable points, incase it suits your requirements.
Regards
- Atul

Updating Administrators(built-in) with item-level targeting on an enforced policy

I need help with this.
In our Computers OU, we have an enforced GPO with a computer policy that adds local admins to the computers on our network. The policy is Computer Configuration >> Policies >> Windows Settings >> Security Settings >> Local Policies/User
Rights Assignment >> Restricted Groups >> Group (BUILTIN\Administrators). For this example, we'll call this GPO #1.
I need to add another user account as a local admin, but targeted to certain computers.
I tried to edit GPO #1. I went into Computer Configuration >> Control Panel Settings > Local Users and Groups, and then added a Group with the settings >> Updating >> Administrators (built-in) & item-level targeting to the computers
I wanted, but the setting always gets over-written by the setting that adds local admins.
I then tried to create a GPO with the Group update. Lets call this GPO #2. I enforced this rule, linked it to the OU, changed the order so that GPO #2 is above GPO #1, but this doesn't seem to be working.
Is my inheritance order incorrect?
1 is GPO #2
2 is GPO #1
Ideas anyone?

> In our Computers OU, we have an enforced GPO with a computer policy that
> adds local admins to the computers on our network. The policy is
> Computer Configuration >> Policies >> Windows Settings >> Security
> Settings >> Local Policies/User Rights Assignment >> Restricted Groups
> >> Group (BUILTIN\Administrators).
Restricted Groups has 2 operation modes: Members and Member of. The
first one clears out any existing members, and that's what you use right
now. The second simply adds a group to another group and keeps all
existing members, that's what you want to use for your additional computers.
> I need to add another user account as a local admin, but targeted to
> certain computers.
To do so, you need to create a domain group that contains the related
account(s). This domain group is "member of" local admins. And make sure
this second GPO is linked higher (so it is processed _after_ the first
one that clears out existing members).
Martin
Mal ein
GUTES Buch über GPOs lesen?
NO THEY ARE NOT EVIL, if you know what you are doing:
Good or bad GPOs?
And if IT bothers me - coke bottle design refreshment :))
Yes I know I can do this, but I can't use item-level targeting with this setup. I don't want the user account to be local admins for all computers. I only want it to be local admins for 4 of them.
Wouldn't precedence take place in this OU if I have the GPO that adds another member as #1, and the GPO that deletes and adds as #2? It isn't working as I had thought it would.

Issue account assignment at item level.

Hi Experts,
I have an issue, because I have created a new order type that has to work the same that the one I have used as model however this new order type doesnu2019t work the same at item level in the view Account assignment. The new has the field Order as optional and in the old this field was hide. All related with account assignment at item level is different. Probably is related with the item category that is also a new one but copy from the order that we use with the other order type.
Thank you and best regards.

Hi,
Are these in different servers? If so, you would need to transport the settings (say from dev. to QA server).
Otherwise, the settings are common for all item catergories and document types... Screen variants are specific to TCodes only.
In case this doesn't help, please clarify question some more... old doc type, item category and new doc type item category.
Cheers.

Read Combination segments for material account from item level

Dear Value Consultant,
Read Combination segments for material account from item level
"For any inventory transactions"
Is there is away to read the material account from item level , to affect the real combination segments not general combinations segments from item master or organization
Business Impacts :
All inventory transaction for all item will affect the same combination segments for material accounts
After I transfer to GL, This not helps me to differentiate the balance for material value is related to any item category
Also for Budget Wise , I want to map the budget on combination level for materials accounts , and this not actualize without affect the real combination for material accounts in subledger ,
Thanks

I have not seen any client asking for this, but you can consider Costing Hooks to create your own accounting engine for inventory transactions. Hope you are taalking about standard costing. In such case, costing hooks are available in Oracle for you to write your own accounting.
Even better in R12, you can do this with setup in SLA.
Thanks
Nagamohan

Items uploading (with g/l accounts by item level) through DTW

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for