Itu2019s showing confirmed qty more that order qty in sales order

Dear Guru's
I am working on production server issue; the issue is delivery has been created more that sales order qty. When I am seeing sales Oder schedule lines itu2019s showing confirmed qty more that order qty in sales order what could be the reason can any help me on this.
Regards
DNR

Hi DNR,
first up, appreciate if you can use your real name instead of DNR , I'd love to see your actual name.
Coming to the question, a deliery can be created more than the ordered quantity. And if you pick whats delivered - that can show as confirmed too..
Standard SAP just throws a warning indicating this over delivery. And incase you want to prevent this happening - you can trigger an user exit to change this warning to error.
Config is also possbile if you have setup your cust mat info record or sales order to check over delivery and set the item cateogry for delivery. You can go to t.code 0VLP( Zero VLP) select Over Delivery - 'B' for delivery item category.
Regards
Sadhu Kishore

Similar Messages

WM Picking Qty more that Delivery Qty

Hi Folks,
I have a case as below.
Sales Order Qty - 100 CS
OBD Qty - 100 CS
Picked Qty in OBD - 120 CS.
WM Picking was done for excess Qty of 20 CS in the same Transfer Order (which was created against the delivery).
I tried to test the issue in Quality Client but there I recieved an Error "Total for assigned quantities exceeds quantity to be removed" .
I really don't understand why system allowd the picking of quantity more than delivery quantity in Production Client.
Any guesses pls.
Thanks

Hi,
Change to 1, copy WM qty as delivery qty and do the cycle in Quality.
Surely it will work.
Or
Also check
check in picking strategies Indicators
Fully stock removal requirement active and
Return stock to the same storage bin

GR Qty more than Delivery Qty in Production Order

Hi
there are a amazing Production order that GR Qty more than Delivery Qty of finished goods in this production order.
there are some data in this production order as below:
Order Qty = 2680
Delivery Qty = 2680
Tolerance = 0
However, to my surprise, Material documents list there are 3500 Qty has been received related this production order. I have check all material documents related this production order. the total GR Qty is 3500 more than 2680.
I know when I do GR for this production order if Total GR Qty exceed Order Qty, So, SAP will not allow me to do. because the Tolerance = 0.
Anybody can tell me, how to deal with this error?
Thanks
Henry

Hi Henry,
If you do not want to restrict the quantities while confirmation, make the changes as required.
Related to Material master, work scheduling view the under/over delivery tolerance should be zero and unlimited delivery tick should not be active
While creation of production order (if manually created) under delivery or over delivery tolerance should be zero and unlimited delivery tick should not be active.
regarding configuration, in OPK4 for plant and order type the following confirmation parameters are to be maintained
Hope this will solve yours, come back if required.
with regards
Ram Kumar

How to avoid that two or more people altering the same Sales Order

I'm looking for a way to avoid that two or more people altering the same Sales Order at the same time.
If someone has entered a Sales Order in the system and something needs to be adjust it can be done by two or more people at the same time. The problem is that when someone is saving these changes, the changes of another person, who is still working on the same order, get lost.
So what we need is an alert that someone is already using this order and that no other person can make any changes at that time. So the order needs to be blocked for altering for any other person at that time.
To avoid this I think you have to do something with the Stored Procedure. Or has someone a more simple and better solution. So far I didn't find a standard option in Business One neither a solution in this forum.
Best regards,
Tim

Tim,
There is nothing in the application settings in Business One that could be used to prevent this. You may post this to the SDK forum as well and perhaps there is a way to achieve this through SDK.

How to avoid that two or more people alter the same Sales Order same time

I'm looking for a way to avoid that two or more people altering the same Sales Order at the same time.
If someone has entered a Sales Order in the system and something needs to be adjust it can be done by two or more people at the same time. The problem is that when someone is saving these changes, the changes of another person, who is still working on the same order, get lost.
So what we need is an alert that someone is already using this order and that no other person can make any changes at that time. So the order needs to be blocked for altering for any other person at that time.
To avoid this I think you have to do something with the Stored Procedure. Or has someone a more simple and better solution.
I've already put this thread in the Business One forum and someone suggested to put it in the Business One SDK forum, as there isn't a solution in Business One itself.
So if someone can give me a direction for a solution I would be very pleased.
Best regards,
Tim

Hi Tim,
The only thing that comes close to what you want in standard SBO is Data Ownership. However, this can't stop someone editing a document that is already being edited.
You can't use stored procedures to track which document is open because the SBO_SP_TransactionNotification proc (which is the only one that you are able to customise) is triggered when a document is updated or added (or cancelled or closed) and not when the document is actually being edited in the user-interface.
You could do this by writing an addon that uses the UI API to trap events in the sales order form. In theory, a sales order is being edited if the sales order form is in Update mode (ie in order for the form to be in Update mode, the user must have selected an existing document and changed the value of at least one field). You can trap the event of the user changing a value and then log the user and document in a table. When other users try to edit the same document, you could check the table and then prevent them changing values. When the first user clicks on the update button (or cancels the update or closes the form etc etc) you can remove the lock on the document. However, I have doubts as to how robust it would be. The problem with this kind of locking solution is that you sometimes get 'stranded' locks (eg user was editing a document when their workstation crashed) and the solution can end up being more troublesome than it is worth.
Kind Regards,
Owen

Confirmation/Back order processing in Sales Order

Hello All,
Need some inputs on the Schedule line confirmation and the back order processing for Sales Order
Scenario 1
Sales order created but there is no stock in Storage location. Based on our settings Sales Order confirmed for a future date(say 10 days) based on the delivery/lead time.
Also sales order goes on credit block. Next we receive stock in storage location.
Now when we release the credit hold it is not doing the confirmation autmatically. I know it can be done but dont know the settings or config where as soon as the Sales order is released from Credit hold then it should do the availibility check and confirm the Order (for todays or toms date.)
Scenario 2:
Sales order created but there is no stock in Storage location. Based on our settings Sales Order confirmed for a future date(say 10 days) based on the delivery/lead time.
Next we receive stock. We would like to confirm the sales order automatically by a program instead of going in individually in each sales order.
What Tcode/program can do this availibility check and confirm the sales order for todays date. Is this a back order processing or rescheduling. Need information on this process..
Thanks
SAP Fans...

HI Rahul
When you create the sales order and if stock is not confirmed then ,system will give the next delivery date and you can do the backorder processing for that sales order . So backorder processing is done only for Open orders
Regards
Srinath

Delivery block with confirm. block on schedule line level in sales order

We customized a new delivery block with confirmation block.
When using it in sales order header, it is working correctly: the availability check in APO gATP is executed; but as soon as I save the sales order, the confirmation quantity is set to zero.
We now need to use this on schedule line level, not on header level. It is not working. Even after saving the confirmed quantity stays as filled by gATP availability check.
What is wrong? SAP help / documentation officially describe that delivery block with confirmation block either works on header level or on schedule line level.
Thanks in advance.
Edited by: Schmidt on Aug 13, 2008 4:47 PM

Please see if OSS notes 21584 and/or 19488 might help.
Regards,
Anisha.

Deleting a Contact on Customer Master with that Contact on Open Sale Orders

Our current SAP system ECC 6.0 allows a user to delete a Contact from the Customer Master where that Contact is also on Open Sales Orders.
Then when our create delivery job runs, it abends saying Contact record not found.
How is this normally handled ? Are users not suppose to delete Contacts from the Customer Master if they are attached to an Sales Order ? Is there some config to turn on in SAP that checks for Open Sales Orders before deleting a Contact in the Customer Master ? Do I code this check in User Exit on the Save in the Customer Master and not let user delete the Contact if it's attached to Open Sales orders ?
Would appreciate any help on this.
Thanks,
David

Hi David,
Try this user exit.
RFDRRANZ User exits: Accounts Receivable Information System
Regards,
Vijay

Is there any bapi that i can create sales order and date

Hi Gurus
is there any bapi that i can create sales order and date .

This appears to be related to Problem With BAPI_SALESORDER_CREATEFROMDATA but without the detail. If you want to ask again, please add that detail.
locked
Rob

Is it possible for us to configure that deletion of a sales order is not po

Hi Guru's,
Is it possible for us to configure that deletion of a sales order is not possible? The requirement is that Sales Order should not be allowed in the SAP to be deleted from the system, and user should not be able to do it.
Please let me know, if this is possible and what is the way to do it.
Points will be awarded.
Regards
Amit Shrivastava

Hi Amit
Better approach Basis Guys to create user profiles and Roles to the users
In SAP its not able to delete the sales orders permanently.
So, its better to create User Profiles and Roles for the user to access the list of Sales orders
Creation of User Profiles and Roles in T-Code--PFCG
Regards
Srinivas.

Pending order delivery against sales order and quotation problem

Dear Expert
I am facing problem when we are tracking delivary quantity against sales order and quotation. then our delivary quantity not matching with invoiced quantity.
Actually the logic of report are below
Pick up the VBAK-VBELN and VBAK-KUNNR where AUART = quotation, VKORG, VTWEG, SPART, ERDAT = selection.
now when any quantity which are added in sales order in new line not cattered through below code and it show problem of mismatch.
Can any one help me in finding data from all this table to catter delivey quantity, quotation qty and sale order qty.
thanks in advance.

Starting from quotes, you could find your quote, then read SD document flow table VBFA for next document of type sales order (could be more than one sales order from a quote). Then you could obtain delivery documents (could be more than one for a sales order) for all your sales orders, again using next document code in table VBFA. This would present you tables that could contain multiple rows:
quote
   sales order
       delivery,
       delivery
    sales order
        delivery
and so forth. You might also consider using table VBUK or VBUP to discover status of each quote item.

Planned Order creation for Sales Order and Purchase Order

Hi
We have a following requirement.
In normal scenario when we have demand for material which was created by MD61 and in addition to that if there is Sales Order the 1st planned order gets revised.To better expalin this consider possible scenario
You create plan via MD61 for 200 qty .The system creates Planned Order for 200.
Now there is Sales Order for 150 peices.Then what happens is original Planed Order of 200 is changed to 50 and another planned order is created for 150 peices.The requirement is not summed.
Now in new scenario instead of Sales Order there is Intercompany Purchase Order of 150 peices.
Now the system is not changing original Planned Order of 200,but it created another planned order of 150.So now there are 2 Planned Orders of 150 and 200.
What I want to know is there any way wherein the system will reduce the original planned order (similar to Sales Order scenario)
Regards

Hi,
Use Strategy 52 in urs case.
PIR witll be created .
None convertable planned order will be created.
Once you get sales order for that material.
New planned order will be created which will consume PIR( planned order ).
Eg.
PIR 10.
Planned order 10 qty.
Sales oder 6
Planned order for SO 6 qty
Planned order through pir will become 4 qty.
Regards,
Vishal

MTO - how to prevent a second planned order for a sales order?

Dear friends,
We are working on Make to Order process (Planning strategy group 20).
No Production/process order is used
Shop floor uses a different system --> details from planned order is passed to the shop floor system; and finished product is delivered/posted into SAP Sales order stock - through interfaces
No QM in place
A typical day-to-day scenario
Sales order Qty = 100
MRP Run à Planned order qty = 100
Raw materials posted to Sales order stock
Planned order is firmed
For example if Produced qty = 90
sales order stock of the finished product = 90
Balance 10 cannot be produced / delivered for various reasons
Planner posts the raw material to cost center / rejections / own stock etc., and ensures that the sales order stock of the raw materials are zero.
Planner deletes the planned order
Next MRP run triggers a new planned order for the balance qty 10
Now, the requirement is to prevent the new planned order getting generated for the balance quantity, during the subsequent MRP run (despite the shortage in the Sales order stock of the finished product).
The following options have been evaluated
Once the final good receipt is done & before deleting the planned order,
o       Change the Sales order quantity to match the total produced quantity
o       (or) Change the schedule line category for the Sales order item from CP to CN
§         Since the Sales order and planned order are handled by different teams, considering the frequency of correspondence/coordination needed between these two teams to get the sales order items corrected, this idea is not accepted
§         Additional authorization for the planner to change the sales order item is not acceptable
Include Under delivery / Unlimited tolerances
o       at the customer (master) level
o       (or) Sales order level
§         In this case, System seems to consider the tolerances only when the delivery for the Sales order is posted; and not when the sales order stock is received within the tolerance limits;
§         Considering the time gap between the GR and Delivery of the finished product, this option is not accepted
Kindly suggest the other options / settings / processes, to meet this requirement
Thank you for your time and efforts.
With Best Regards,
Senthil

Closing this thread
Thanks
Senthil

Cost analysis through Purchase Order created from Sales Order

Hi Experts,
This is the scenario: There is an Item No. which is not stocked in warehouse and is purchased only when customers ask for it. The cost of the sales order line having this item is calculated by the Purchase Order line on which the item is there. (The PO have items for other Sales Orders as well. And, Sales Orders have multiple item types) The Sales Order have the PO no. against it and Purchase Order has SO no. against the line. This is all done using MS Access and Sage Accounts. Lots of free typing and manual cost analysis involved.
I have gathered from this forum that we can create Purchase Order from the Sales Order. The Document No. information can be pulled from one another using Formatted Search. Can we do the accounting and cost analysis as well?
Please let me know if I have not made myself clear.
Thank you in advance and kind regards.
IC
Edited by: iancameron03 on Sep 20, 2011 4:35 PM

Hi Ian,
I concur with Faraz, it is better if you use procurement document facility in doing back to back transaction from SO to PO.
However, in your case, I'm afraid you can't analyze the gross profit and recording the accounting related activity as your request using standard SAP B1 function.
As for gross profit case:
Since you're actually using workaround in order to evade all hassles in maintaining all item master data related to this case, you create just one item code called S1 right?
SO DocEntry - SO Line # - Item Code - Item Name - Quantity - Price
1001 - 0 - S1 - Table - 2 - 100
1001 - 1 - S1 - Chair - 8 - 25
1001 - 2 - S1 - Cloth - 3 - 10
PO # - PO Line # - PO BaseEntry (SO DocEntry) - PO BaseLine (SO Line #) - Item Code - Item Name - Quantity - Price
2001 - 0 - 1001 - 0 - S1 - 2 - 100
2001 - 1 - 1001 - 1 - S1 - 8 - 25
2001 - 2 - 1001 - 2 - S1 - 3 - 10
Note that standard B1 gross profit calculation is that system will compare selling price for each item with item cost / certain price list of each respective item. However, in your case, you put all item as a single item master. Thus, system couldn't compare Table to Table, Chair to Chair, Cloth to Cloth since the item cost for these 3 items will be the same, the price list for these 3 items will also be the same since it is actually only one master data. Of course you could update the gross profit calculation manually for each SO, but to be honest it seems rather weird to do this manually.
So, in order to simulate the gross profit calculation, you need to create a custom query and comparing PO line no with SO line no.
As far as accounting related recording concern, I'm afraid you can't do it
1. SO 1 : Item Table - Selling price 130 ; Item Chair - Selling price 30
2. PO 1 (linked to SO 1) : Item Table - Purchase price 100 ; Item Chair - Purchase price 25
3. SO 2 : Item Table - Selling price 150 ; Item Chair - Selling price 40
4. PO 2 (linked to SO 2) : Item Table - Purchase price 110 ; Item Chair - Purchase price 30
Correct me if I'm wrong, you want to record accounting wise that CoGS of Delivery based on SO 1 is 100 for Table and 25 for Chair, isn't it? No matter what costing method you use, you can't achieve this.
If you use moving average, system will average both Table and Chair cost price, since it is actually one item master data. Even if you distinguish each item as a master data, system will average the cost price for Table and Cloth by the time GR for PO 1 and PO 2 occurred.
Example (order by sequence of event):
1. GR based on PO 1 - Table - Purchase price = 100, therefore Item cost = 100
2. GR based on PO 2 - Table - Purchase price = 110, therefore Item cost = 105 (considering quantity only one for both PO)
3. Delivery based on SO 1 - Table - CoGS incurred will be 105, not 100
To certain extent, same thing could be said with FIFO costing method
1. GR based on PO 1 - Table - Purchase price = 100 (qty 1)
2. GR based on PO 2 - Table - Purchase price = 110 (qty 1)
3. Delivery based on SO 1 - Table - CoGS incurred will be 100 (qty 1)
4. Delivery based on SO 2 - Table - CoGS incurred will be 110 (qty 1)
At first glance, it seems right since the CoGS for SO 1 is 100, tied up with purchase price for PO 1. And CoGS for SO 2 is 110, tied up with purchase price for PO 2. But we're using assumption here, we're assuming the sequence of Goods Receipt of PO and Delivery of SO occurred in the very same sequence as the issuance of SO and PO.
1. GR based on PO 1 - Table - Purchase price = 100 (qty 1)
2. GR based on PO 2 - Table - Purchase price = 110 (qty 1)
3. Delivery based on SO 2 - Table - CoGS incurred will be 100 (qty 1)
4. Delivery based on SO 1 - Table - CoGS incurred will be 110 (qty 1)
If above scenario / sequence that happened, you will get the wrong figure of gross profit since the Delivery of SO 2 will take the item cost based on GR of PO 1. Since we're actually talking about real life business process, who can guarantee that above scenario wouldn't happen? It is possible that you send goods to customer who ordered late in real life, too much possibility that it is better for you to mitigate such result.
My suggestion would be that you record the accounting transaction based on standard business process, no need to really capture the actual cost and actual gross profit for certain SO and PO. Too complicated, and the software itself doesn't cater this kind of requirement. Best thing you could do only create custom query for gross profit simulation calculation, but for very accurate accounting recording, IMO you should forget it. Hope this help.
Best Regards,
Hendry Wijaya

GR for order against a sale order, in MMBE

Dear all Hi,
I have made GR for order against a sale order, in MMBE X qty of stock is displayed as sale order stock, but when i check it for its reservation the system is not displaying the reference of sale order & also in MMBE screen it is sdisplaying sale order stock qty as X under unrestricted usebut correspondingly it not showing anything under Reserved column,
Please help.
thanks in advance.

for material(say A) and plant combination In MMBE what you see is the stock against the sales order which is the result of GR with sales order as account assignment.
Now reservation what you see in MMBE is the reservation made on material A by its parent matrials which my abe sales order account assigned or may not be assigned..\
Hence these two are different meaning and consideration.
please come back.

Itu2019s showing confirmed qty more that order qty in sales order

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for