Job gets stucked

Hello all, I have the following issue with a Replication Job that connects to several DBs trough DB links... so the problem is when this job goes to a remote database which connection is really slow and disconnects a lot... so the job keeps trying to connect or something but it basically gets stucked there in that DB and doesnt go to the next one...
so I know that one solution is to improve that connection between the central DB and the remote one, but my concern is if this happens with another one and so.
My question then is how can I control or create a timeout so when the job doesnt get the data in certain amount of time it fails to the next DB?
thanks

well to be honest I don't any idea how those windows work and how they will fix the issue of the job getting stuck.. what I read it is related to allocation of resources but not sure, could you explain me plz.
Something else I would like to add is, when I notice that the job is stucked I try to do an Orakill of the job process number, I get that info with this query
Select spid thread ,osuser, s.program ,job,failures,last_date,this_date
From v$process p, v$session s, dba_jobs_running j
Where p.addr=s.paddr
And s.sid=j.SID
I do the following:
1-place job offline.
2-execute orakill on server
3-drop the job and recreate it.
but the funny thing is that right after I execute the orakill the process starts again Ithink but with another thread number so I cannot drop the job. when this happens I have to take de database offline and back on but I dont like doing that...

Similar Messages

  • HELP !  Print jobs getting stuck in Queue

    Hello:
    I am using a HP Deskjet 5550 with two Mac's - an iMac G3 Classic and an iMac G5
    Tiger. I have the printer connected to both Mac's. I am using the USB connection for the G3 and the Serial - USB connection for the G5.
    I have no problem printing from the G3, but the 5 is getting me frustrated!
    The printer prints a few pages and then the rest of the printing gets stuck &
    stopped in the Queue. I am using the 2.7.1 driver from the Tiger install DVD,
    but I have also tried the drivers from the HP download page.
    I have also tried doing a Reset of the printer system. This problem does seem
    to be intermitten but it is far worse most of the time then better.
    I have looked at the HP Support site, but there is nothing I have found for
    this problem. I have also tried using the Printer Sharing on the G5 (Tiger).
    Any input/suggestions/ideads most greatley appreciated.

    Did it ever work?  How did you install the printer?  Did you follow these directions on page 12?  How did it go?
    Say thanks by clicking "Kudos" "thumbs up" in the post that helped you.
    I am employed by HP

  • Network Print Jobs Always Get Stuck in Queue

    Hello,
    I have, perhaps, the most frustrating problem on the planet.  In my home network, I have a HP Color LaserJet 2600n connected to my main PC, with 2 other PC's on the network.  All 3 run Windows 7.  Printing from my main PC works fine, but if I try to print over the network, the print job always gets stuck in the queue.  I can see it stuck in the queue on my main PC, but I can't do anything about it.  I can't delete it, nothing.  If I restart the spooler, then it magically prints and clears the queue, but it's annoying to have to do that all the time.  I've reinstalled the drivers several times to no avail.  Tips?
    RPGillespie

    I have a similar problem, I have a directly connected 1300 and a network P3015. The 1300 is connected via USB, the 3015 is connected by RJ45 cable right to the router. Both printers have their print queues get stuck, but only from my HP Pavilion Elite HPE running HP-installed Windows 7. All the other machines in the office can use the 3015 printer perfectly well. One is an older Pavilion using XP-Pro, another is a Dell using XP-Pro and the third is a Lenovo laptop using Windows 7. All our toners are not refills (seems like a stupid suggestion that the toner cartridge could cause a queue to lock up). The problem is definitely between my machine and the HP printers. I have a Brother printer and a couple of Seiko/Epson printers that all work perfectly fine.
    Rebooting several times a day is getting old.

  • Job its getting stuck on SIL_PurchaserOrderCostFact_Full

    Hi Gurus,
    I am running a DAC a job after rebuilding a new env but the Job takes an Hour in prodn env but now taking almost 2 hours in the new env. After investigation, the issue is the Job its getting stuck on SIL_PurchaserOrderCostFact_Full for almost an hour but in prod it complete in 2minutes or less. The job ends up completing in 2 hours.
    I applied the following patches EBF189068, EBF191169 and patch 10052370
    BI APPS 7.9.5
    DAC 10.1.3.4.1
    OBIEE 10.1.3.4.0
    Below is the log detail for SIL_PurchaseOrderCostFact_Full
    Thanks
    Simmz
    WRITER_1_*_1> WRT_8167 Start loading table [W_PURCH_COST_F] at: Thu May 26 16:29:03 2011
    WRITER_1_*_1> WRT_8161
    TARGET BASED COMMIT POINT Thu May 26 16:30:15 2011
    ===================================================
    WRT_8036 Target: W_PURCH_COST_F (Instance Name: [W_PURCH_COST_F])
    WRT_8038 Inserted rows - Requested: 10008 Applied: 10008 Rejected: 0 Affected: 10008
    WRITER_1_*_1> WRT_8161
    TARGET BASED COMMIT POINT Thu May 26 16:31:31 2011
    ===================================================
    WRT_8036 Target: W_PURCH_COST_F (Instance Name: [W_PURCH_COST_F])
    WRT_8038 Inserted rows - Requested: 20016 Applied: 20016 Rejected: 0 Affected: 20016
    WRITER_1_*_1> WRT_8161
    TARGET BASED COMMIT POINT Thu May 26 16:32:52 2011
    ===================================================
    WRT_8036 Target: W_PURCH_COST_F (Instance Name: [W_PURCH_COST_F])
    WRT_8038 Inserted rows - Requested: 30024 Applied: 30024 Rejected: 0 Affected: 30024
    WRITER_1_*_1> WRT_8161
    TARGET BASED COMMIT POINT Thu May 26 16:34:20 2011
    ===================================================
    WRT_8036 Target: W_PURCH_COST_F (Instance Name: [W_PURCH_COST_F])
    WRT_8038 Inserted rows - Requested: 40032 Applied: 40032 Rejected: 0 Affected: 40032
    WRITER_1_*_1> WRT_8161
    TARGET BASED COMMIT POINT Thu May 26 16:35:44 2011
    ===================================================
    WRT_8036 Target: W_PURCH_COST_F (Instance Name: [W_PURCH_COST_F])
    WRT_8038 Inserted rows - Requested: 50040 Applied: 50040 Rejected: 0 Affected: 50040
    WRITER_1_*_1> WRT_8161
    TARGET BASED COMMIT POINT Thu May 26 16:37:02 2011
    ===================================================
    WRT_8036 Target: W_PURCH_COST_F (Instance Name: [W_PURCH_COST_F])
    WRT_8038 Inserted rows - Requested: 60048 Applied: 60048 Rejected: 0 Affected: 60048
    WRITER_1_*_1> WRT_8161
    TARGET BASED COMMIT POINT Thu May 26 16:38:21 2011
    ===================================================
    WRT_8036 Target: W_PURCH_COST_F (Instance Name: [W_PURCH_COST_F])
    WRT_8038 Inserted rows - Requested: 70056 Applied: 70056 Rejected: 0 Affected: 70056
    WRITER_1_*_1> WRT_8161
    TARGET BASED COMMIT POINT Thu May 26 16:39:49 2011
    ===================================================
    WRT_8036 Target: W_PURCH_COST_F (Instance Name: [W_PURCH_COST_F])
    WRT_8038 Inserted rows - Requested: 80064 Applied: 80064 Rejected: 0 Affected: 80064
    WRITER_1_*_1> WRT_8161
    TARGET BASED COMMIT POINT Thu May 26 16:41:18 2011
    ===================================================
    WRT_8036 Target: W_PURCH_COST_F (Instance Name: [W_PURCH_COST_F])
    WRT_8038 Inserted rows - Requested: 90072 Applied: 90072 Rejected: 0 Affected: 90072
    WRITER_1_*_1> WRT_8161
    TARGET BASED COMMIT POINT Thu May 26 16:42:36 2011
    ===================================================
    WRT_8036 Target: W_PURCH_COST_F (Instance Name: [W_PURCH_COST_F])
    WRT_8038 Inserted rows - Requested: 100080 Applied: 100080 Rejected: 0 Affected: 100080
    WRITER_1_*_1> WRT_8161
    TARGET BASED COMMIT POINT Thu May 26 16:43:42 2011
    ===================================================
    WRT_8036 Target: W_PURCH_COST_F (Instance Name: [W_PURCH_COST_F])
    WRT_8038 Inserted rows - Requested: 110088 Applied: 110088 Rejected: 0 Affected: 110088
    WRITER_1_*_1> WRT_8161
    TARGET BASED COMMIT POINT Thu May 26 16:44:56 2011
    ===================================================
    WRT_8036 Target: W_PURCH_COST_F (Instance Name: [W_PURCH_COST_F])
    WRT_8038 Inserted rows - Requested: 120096 Applied: 120096 Rejected: 0 Affected: 120096
    WRITER_1_*_1> WRT_8161
    TARGET BASED COMMIT POINT Thu May 26 16:46:15 2011
    ===================================================
    WRT_8036 Target: W_PURCH_COST_F (Instance Name: [W_PURCH_COST_F])
    WRT_8038 Inserted rows - Requested: 130104 Applied: 130104 Rejected: 0 Affected: 130104
    WRITER_1_*_1> WRT_8161
    TARGET BASED COMMIT POINT Thu May 26 16:47:28 2011
    ===================================================
    WRT_8036 Target: W_PURCH_COST_F (Instance Name: [W_PURCH_COST_F])
    WRT_8038 Inserted rows - Requested: 140112 Applied: 140112 Rejected: 0 Affected: 140112
    WRITER_1_*_1> WRT_8161
    TARGET BASED COMMIT POINT Thu May 26 16:48:41 2011
    ===================================================
    WRT_8036 Target: W_PURCH_COST_F (Instance Name: [W_PURCH_COST_F])
    WRT_8038 Inserted rows - Requested: 150120 Applied: 150120 Rejected: 0 Affected: 150120
    WRITER_1_*_1> WRT_8161
    TARGET BASED COMMIT POINT Thu May 26 16:49:56 2011
    ===================================================
    WRT_8036 Target: W_PURCH_COST_F (Instance Name: [W_PURCH_COST_F])
    WRT_8038 Inserted rows - Requested: 160128 Applied: 160128 Rejected: 0 Affected: 160128
    WRITER_1_*_1> WRT_8161
    TARGET BASED COMMIT POINT Thu May 26 16:51:15 2011
    ===================================================
    WRT_8036 Target: W_PURCH_COST_F (Instance Name: [W_PURCH_COST_F])
    WRT_8038 Inserted rows - Requested: 170136 Applied: 170136 Rejected: 0 Affected: 170136
    WRITER_1_*_1> WRT_8161
    TARGET BASED COMMIT POINT Thu May 26 16:52:31 2011
    ===================================================
    WRT_8036 Target: W_PURCH_COST_F (Instance Name: [W_PURCH_COST_F])
    WRT_8038 Inserted rows - Requested: 180144 Applied: 180144 Rejected: 0 Affected: 180144
    WRITER_1_*_1> WRT_8161
    TARGET BASED COMMIT POINT Thu May 26 16:53:46 2011
    ===================================================
    WRT_8036 Target: W_PURCH_COST_F (Instance Name: [W_PURCH_COST_F])
    WRT_8038 Inserted rows - Requested: 190152 Applied: 190152 Rejected: 0 Affected: 190152
    WRITER_1_*_1> WRT_8161
    TARGET BASED COMMIT POINT Thu May 26 16:54:46 2011
    ===================================================
    WRT_8036 Target: W_PURCH_COST_F (Instance Name: [W_PURCH_COST_F])
    WRT_8038 Inserted rows - Requested: 200160 Applied: 200160 Rejected: 0 Affected: 200160
    WRITER_1_*_1> WRT_8161
    TARGET BASED COMMIT POINT Thu May 26 16:56:05 2011
    ===================================================
    WRT_8036 Target: W_PURCH_COST_F (Instance Name: [W_PURCH_COST_F])
    WRT_8038 Inserted rows - Requested: 210168 Applied: 210168 Rejected: 0 Affected: 210168
    WRITER_1_*_1> WRT_8161
    TARGET BASED COMMIT POINT Thu May 26 16:57:29 2011
    ===================================================
    WRT_8036 Target: W_PURCH_COST_F (Instance Name: [W_PURCH_COST_F])
    WRT_8038 Inserted rows - Requested: 220176 Applied: 220176 Rejected: 0 Affected: 220176
    WRITER_1_*_1> WRT_8161
    TARGET BASED COMMIT POINT Thu May 26 16:58:50 2011
    ===================================================
    WRT_8036 Target: W_PURCH_COST_F (Instance Name: [W_PURCH_COST_F])
    WRT_8038 Inserted rows - Requested: 230184 Applied: 230184 Rejected: 0 Affected: 230184
    WRITER_1_*_1> WRT_8161
    TARGET BASED COMMIT POINT Thu May 26 17:00:03 2011
    ===================================================
    WRT_8036 Target: W_PURCH_COST_F (Instance Name: [W_PURCH_COST_F])
    WRT_8038 Inserted rows - Requested: 240192 Applied: 240192 Rejected: 0 Affected: 240192
    WRITER_1_*_1> WRT_8161
    TARGET BASED COMMIT POINT Thu May 26 17:01:17 2011
    ===================================================
    WRT_8036 Target: W_PURCH_COST_F (Instance Name: [W_PURCH_COST_F])
    WRT_8038 Inserted rows - Requested: 250200 Applied: 250200 Rejected: 0 Affected: 250200
    WRITER_1_*_1> WRT_8161
    TARGET BASED COMMIT POINT Thu May 26 17:02:32 2011
    ===================================================
    WRT_8036 Target: W_PURCH_COST_F (Instance Name: [W_PURCH_COST_F])
    WRT_8038 Inserted rows - Requested: 260208 Applied: 260208 Rejected: 0 Affected: 260208
    WRITER_1_*_1> WRT_8161
    TARGET BASED COMMIT POINT Thu May 26 17:03:49 2011
    ===================================================
    WRT_8036 Target: W_PURCH_COST_F (Instance Name: [W_PURCH_COST_F])
    WRT_8038 Inserted rows - Requested: 270216 Applied: 270216 Rejected: 0 Affected: 270216
    WRITER_1_*_1> WRT_8161
    TARGET BASED COMMIT POINT Thu May 26 17:05:04 2011
    ===================================================
    WRT_8036 Target: W_PURCH_COST_F (Instance Name: [W_PURCH_COST_F])
    WRT_8038 Inserted rows - Requested: 280224 Applied: 280224 Rejected: 0 Affected: 280224
    WRITER_1_*_1> WRT_8161
    TARGET BASED COMMIT POINT Thu May 26 17:06:21 2011
    ===================================================
    WRT_8036 Target: W_PURCH_COST_F (Instance Name: [W_PURCH_COST_F])
    WRT_8038 Inserted rows - Requested: 290232 Applied: 290232 Rejected: 0 Affected: 290232
    WRITER_1_*_1> WRT_8161
    TARGET BASED COMMIT POINT Thu May 26 17:07:38 2011
    ===================================================
    WRT_8036 Target: W_PURCH_COST_F (Instance Name: [W_PURCH_COST_F])
    WRT_8038 Inserted rows - Requested: 300240 Applied: 300240 Rejected: 0 Affected: 300240
    WRITER_1_*_1> WRT_8161
    TARGET BASED COMMIT POINT Thu May 26 17:09:03 2011
    ===================================================
    WRT_8036 Target: W_PURCH_COST_F (Instance Name: [W_PURCH_COST_F])
    WRT_8038 Inserted rows - Requested: 310248 Applied: 310248 Rejected: 0 Affected: 310248
    WRITER_1_*_1> WRT_8161
    TARGET BASED COMMIT POINT Thu May 26 17:10:33 2011
    ===================================================
    WRT_8036 Target: W_PURCH_COST_F (Instance Name: [W_PURCH_COST_F])
    WRT_8038 Inserted rows - Requested: 320256 Applied: 320256 Rejected: 0 Affected: 320256
    WRITER_1_*_1> WRT_8161
    TARGET BASED COMMIT POINT Thu May 26 17:12:04 2011
    ===================================================
    WRT_8036 Target: W_PURCH_COST_F (Instance Name: [W_PURCH_COST_F])
    WRT_8038 Inserted rows - Requested: 330264 Applied: 330264 Rejected: 0 Affected: 330264
    WRITER_1_*_1> WRT_8161
    TARGET BASED COMMIT POINT Thu May 26 17:13:31 2011
    ===================================================
    WRT_8036 Target: W_PURCH_COST_F (Instance Name: [W_PURCH_COST_F])
    WRT_8038 Inserted rows - Requested: 340272 Applied: 340272 Rejected: 0 Affected: 340272
    WRITER_1_*_1> WRT_8161
    TARGET BASED COMMIT POINT Thu May 26 17:14:58 2011
    ===================================================
    WRT_8036 Target: W_PURCH_COST_F (Instance Name: [W_PURCH_COST_F])
    WRT_8038 Inserted rows - Requested: 350280 Applied: 350280 Rejected: 0 Affected: 350280
    WRITER_1_*_1> WRT_8161
    TARGET BASED COMMIT POINT Thu May 26 17:16:14 2011
    ===================================================
    WRT_8036 Target: W_PURCH_COST_F (Instance Name: [W_PURCH_COST_F])
    WRT_8038 Inserted rows - Requested: 360288 Applied: 360288 Rejected: 0 Affected: 360288
    WRITER_1_*_1> WRT_8161
    TARGET BASED COMMIT POINT Thu May 26 17:17:44 2011
    ===================================================
    WRT_8036 Target: W_PURCH_COST_F (Instance Name: [W_PURCH_COST_F])
    WRT_8038 Inserted rows - Requested: 370296 Applied: 370296 Rejected: 0 Affected: 370296
    WRITER_1_*_1> WRT_8161
    TARGET BASED COMMIT POINT Thu May 26 17:19:06 2011
    ===================================================
    WRT_8036 Target: W_PURCH_COST_F (Instance Name: [W_PURCH_COST_F])
    WRT_8038 Inserted rows - Requested: 380304 Applied: 380304 Rejected: 0 Affected: 380304
    WRITER_1_*_1> WRT_8161
    TARGET BASED COMMIT POINT Thu May 26 17:20:38 2011
    ===================================================
    WRT_8036 Target: W_PURCH_COST_F (Instance Name: [W_PURCH_COST_F])
    WRT_8038 Inserted rows - Requested: 390312 Applied: 390312 Rejected: 0 Affected: 390312
    WRITER_1_*_1> WRT_8161
    TARGET BASED COMMIT POINT Thu May 26 17:21:55 2011
    ===================================================
    WRT_8036 Target: W_PURCH_COST_F (Instance Name: [W_PURCH_COST_F])
    WRT_8038 Inserted rows - Requested: 400320 Applied: 400320 Rejected: 0 Affected: 400320
    WRITER_1_*_1> WRT_8161
    TARGET BASED COMMIT POINT Thu May 26 17:23:15 2011
    ===================================================
    WRT_8036 Target: W_PURCH_COST_F (Instance Name: [W_PURCH_COST_F])
    WRT_8038 Inserted rows - Requested: 410328 Applied: 410328 Rejected: 0 Affected: 410328
    WRITER_1_*_1> WRT_8161
    TARGET BASED COMMIT POINT Thu May 26 17:24:39 2011
    ===================================================
    WRT_8036 Target: W_PURCH_COST_F (Instance Name: [W_PURCH_COST_F])
    WRT_8038 Inserted rows - Requested: 420336 Applied: 420336 Rejected: 0 Affected: 420336
    WRITER_1_*_1> WRT_8161
    TARGET BASED COMMIT POINT Thu May 26 17:25:58 2011
    ===================================================
    WRT_8036 Target: W_PURCH_COST_F (Instance Name: [W_PURCH_COST_F])
    WRT_8038 Inserted rows - Requested: 430344 Applied: 430344 Rejected: 0 Affected: 430344
    WRITER_1_*_1> WRT_8161
    TARGET BASED COMMIT POINT Thu May 26 17:27:17 2011
    ===================================================
    WRT_8036 Target: W_PURCH_COST_F (Instance Name: [W_PURCH_COST_F])
    WRT_8038 Inserted rows - Requested: 440352 Applied: 440352 Rejected: 0 Affected: 440352
    WRITER_1_*_1> WRT_8161
    TARGET BASED COMMIT POINT Thu May 26 17:28:39 2011
    ===================================================
    WRT_8036 Target: W_PURCH_COST_F (Instance Name: [W_PURCH_COST_F])
    WRT_8038 Inserted rows - Requested: 450360 Applied: 450360 Rejected: 0 Affected: 450360
    WRITER_1_*_1> WRT_8161
    TARGET BASED COMMIT POINT Thu May 26 17:29:57 2011
    ===================================================
    WRT_8036 Target: W_PURCH_COST_F (Instance Name: [W_PURCH_COST_F])
    WRT_8038 Inserted rows - Requested: 460368 Applied: 460368 Rejected: 0 Affected: 460368
    WRITER_1_*_1> WRT_8161
    TARGET BASED COMMIT POINT Thu May 26 17:31:22 2011
    ===================================================
    WRT_8036 Target: W_PURCH_COST_F (Instance Name: [W_PURCH_COST_F])
    WRT_8038 Inserted rows - Requested: 470376 Applied: 470376 Rejected: 0 Affected: 470376
    WRITER_1_*_1> WRT_8161
    TARGET BASED COMMIT POINT Thu May 26 17:32:52 2011
    ===================================================
    WRT_8036 Target: W_PURCH_COST_F (Instance Name: [W_PURCH_COST_F])
    WRT_8038 Inserted rows - Requested: 480384 Applied: 480384 Rejected: 0 Affected: 480384
    WRITER_1_*_1> WRT_8161
    TARGET BASED COMMIT POINT Thu May 26 17:34:16 2011
    ===================================================
    WRT_8036 Target: W_PURCH_COST_F (Instance Name: [W_PURCH_COST_F])
    WRT_8038 Inserted rows - Requested: 490392 Applied: 490392 Rejected: 0 Affected: 490392
    WRITER_1_*_1> WRT_8161
    TARGET BASED COMMIT POINT Thu May 26 17:35:36 2011
    ===================================================
    WRT_8036 Target: W_PURCH_COST_F (Instance Name: [W_PURCH_COST_F])
    WRT_8038 Inserted rows - Requested: 500400 Applied: 500400 Rejected: 0 Affected: 500400
    WRITER_1_*_1> WRT_8161
    TARGET BASED COMMIT POINT Thu May 26 17:37:03 2011
    ===================================================
    WRT_8036 Target: W_PURCH_COST_F (Instance Name: [W_PURCH_COST_F])
    WRT_8038 Inserted rows - Requested: 510408 Applied: 510408 Rejected: 0 Affected: 510408
    WRITER_1_*_1> WRT_8161
    TARGET BASED COMMIT POINT Thu May 26 17:38:22 2011
    ===================================================
    WRT_8036 Target: W_PURCH_COST_F (Instance Name: [W_PURCH_COST_F])
    WRT_8038 Inserted rows - Requested: 520416 Applied: 520416 Rejected: 0 Affected: 520416
    WRITER_1_*_1> WRT_8161
    TARGET BASED COMMIT POINT Thu May 26 17:39:36 2011
    ===================================================
    WRT_8036 Target: W_PURCH_COST_F (Instance Name: [W_PURCH_COST_F])
    WRT_8038 Inserted rows - Requested: 530424 Applied: 530424 Rejected: 0 Affected: 530424
    WRITER_1_*_1> WRT_8161
    TARGET BASED COMMIT POINT Thu May 26 17:40:58 2011
    ===================================================
    WRT_8036 Target: W_PURCH_COST_F (Instance Name: [W_PURCH_COST_F])
    WRT_8038 Inserted rows - Requested: 540432 Applied: 540432 Rejected: 0 Affected: 540432
    WRITER_1_*_1> WRT_8161
    TARGET BASED COMMIT POINT Thu May 26 17:42:20 2011
    ===================================================
    WRT_8036 Target: W_PURCH_COST_F (Instance Name: [W_PURCH_COST_F])
    WRT_8038 Inserted rows - Requested: 550440 Applied: 550440 Rejected: 0 Affected: 550440
    WRITER_1_*_1> WRT_8161
    TARGET BASED COMMIT POINT Thu May 26 17:43:37 2011
    ===================================================
    WRT_8036 Target: W_PURCH_COST_F (Instance Name: [W_PURCH_COST_F])
    WRT_8038 Inserted rows - Requested: 560448 Applied: 560448 Rejected: 0 Affected: 560448
    WRITER_1_*_1> WRT_8161
    TARGET BASED COMMIT POINT Thu May 26 17:44:25 2011
    ===================================================
    WRT_8036 Target: W_PURCH_COST_F (Instance Name: [W_PURCH_COST_F])
    WRT_8038 Inserted rows - Requested: 570456 Applied: 570456 Rejected: 0 Affected: 570456
    WRITER_1_*_1> WRT_8161
    TARGET BASED COMMIT POINT Thu May 26 17:45:09 2011
    ===================================================
    WRT_8036 Target: W_PURCH_COST_F (Instance Name: [W_PURCH_COST_F])
    WRT_8038 Inserted rows - Requested: 580464 Applied: 580464 Rejected: 0 Affected: 580464
    WRITER_1_*_1> WRT_8161
    TARGET BASED COMMIT POINT Thu May 26 17:46:19 2011
    ===================================================
    WRT_8036 Target: W_PURCH_COST_F (Instance Name: [W_PURCH_COST_F])
    WRT_8038 Inserted rows - Requested: 590472 Applied: 590472 Rejected: 0 Affected: 590472
    READER_1_1_1> BLKR_16019 Read [597399] rows, read [0] error rows for source table [W_INT_ORG_D] instance name [W_INT_ORG_D]
    READER_1_1_1> BLKR_16008 Reader run completed.
    TRANSF_1_1_1> DBG_21216 Finished transformations for Source Qualifier [Sq_W_PURCH_COST_FS]. Total errors [0]
    WRITER_1_*_1> WRT_8168 End loading table [W_PURCH_COST_F] at: Thu May 26 17:47:08 2011
    WRITER_1_*_1> WRT_8141
    Commit on end-of-data Thu May 26 17:47:08 2011
    ===================================================
    WRT_8036 Target: W_PURCH_COST_F (Instance Name: [W_PURCH_COST_F])
    WRT_8038 Inserted rows - Requested: 597399 Applied: 597399 Rejected: 0 Affected: 597399
    WRITER_1_*_1> WRT_8035 Load complete time: Thu May 26 17:47:08 2011
    LOAD SUMMARY
    ============
    WRT_8036 Target: W_PURCH_COST_F (Instance Name: [W_PURCH_COST_F])
    WRT_8038 Inserted rows - Requested: 597399 Applied: 597399 Rejected: 0 Affected: 597399
    WRITER_1__1> WRT_8043 ****END LOAD SESSION*****
    WRITER_1_*_1> WRT_8006 Writer run completed.
    MANAGER> PETL_24031
    ***** RUN INFO FOR TGT LOAD ORDER GROUP [1], CONCURRENT SET [1] *****
    Thread [READER_1_1_1] created for [the read stage] of partition point [Sq_W_PURCH_COST_FS] has completed: Total Run Time = [4877.310545] secs, Total Idle Time = [187.907454] secs, Busy Percentage = [96.147314].
    Thread [TRANSF_1_1_1] created for [the transformation stage] of partition point [Sq_W_PURCH_COST_FS] has completed: Total Run Time = [4875.388657] secs, Total Idle Time = [4867.607283] secs, Busy Percentage = [0.159605].
    Thread [WRITER_1_*_1] created for [the write stage] of partition point [W_PURCH_COST_F] has completed: Total Run Time = [4817.325787] secs, Total Idle Time = [4796.966177] secs, Busy Percentage = [0.422633].
    MAPPING> CMN_1793 The index cache size that would hold [411967] rows in the lookup table for [mplt_SIL_PurchaseCostFact.Lkp_W_Inventory_Product_D_Inventory_Prod_Wid], in memory, is [107673600] bytes
    MAPPING> CMN_1792 The data cache size that would hold [411967] rows in the lookup table for [mplt_SIL_PurchaseCostFact.Lkp_W_Inventory_Product_D_Inventory_Prod_Wid], in memory, is [9912320] bytes
    MAPPING> CMN_1793 The index cache size that would hold [1] rows in the lookup table for [mplt_SIL_PurchaseCostFact.Lkp_W_SUPPLIER_PRODUCT_D_Supplier_Prod_Wid], in memory, is [25600] bytes
    MAPPING> CMN_1792 The data cache size that would hold [1] rows in the lookup table for [mplt_SIL_PurchaseCostFact.Lkp_W_SUPPLIER_PRODUCT_D_Supplier_Prod_Wid], in memory, is [16384] bytes
    MAPPING> CMN_1793 The index cache size that would hold [7333] rows in the lookup table for [mplt_SIL_PurchaseCostFact.Lkp_W_Employee_D_Requestor_Wid], in memory, is [1945600] bytes
    MAPPING> CMN_1792 The data cache size that would hold [7333] rows in the lookup table for [mplt_SIL_PurchaseCostFact.Lkp_W_Employee_D_Requestor_Wid], in memory, is [188416] bytes
    MAPPING> CMN_1793 The index cache size that would hold [7333] rows in the lookup table for [mplt_SIL_PurchaseCostFact.Lkp_W_Employee_D_Buyer_Wid], in memory, is [1945600] bytes
    MAPPING> CMN_1792 The data cache size that would hold [7333] rows in the lookup table for [mplt_SIL_PurchaseCostFact.Lkp_W_Employee_D_Buyer_Wid], in memory, is [188416] bytes
    MAPPING> CMN_1793 The index cache size that would hold [7070] rows in the lookup table for [mplt_SIL_PurchaseCostFact.Lkp_W_Cost_Center_D_Cost_Center_Wid], in memory, is [1868800] bytes
    MAPPING> CMN_1792 The data cache size that would hold [7070] rows in the lookup table for [mplt_SIL_PurchaseCostFact.Lkp_W_Cost_Center_D_Cost_Center_Wid], in memory, is [180224] bytes
    MAPPING> CMN_1793 The index cache size that would hold [2] rows in the lookup table for [mplt_SIL_PurchaseCostFact.Lkp_W_PROFIT_CENTER_D_Profit_Center_Wid], in memory, is [25600] bytes
    MAPPING> CMN_1792 The data cache size that would hold [2] rows in the lookup table for [mplt_SIL_PurchaseCostFact.Lkp_W_PROFIT_CENTER_D_Profit_Center_Wid], in memory, is [16384] bytes
    MAPPING> CMN_1793 The index cache size that would hold [211199] rows in the lookup table for [mplt_SIL_PurchaseCostFact.Lkp_W_PRODUCT_D_Product_Wid], in memory, is [55219200] bytes
    MAPPING> CMN_1792 The data cache size that would hold [211199] rows in the lookup table for [mplt_SIL_PurchaseCostFact.Lkp_W_PRODUCT_D_Product_Wid], in memory, is [5087232] bytes
    MAPPING> CMN_1793 The index cache size that would hold [31568] rows in the lookup table for [mplt_SIL_PurchaseCostFact.Lkp_W_GL_ACCOUNT_D_Gl_Account_Wid], in memory, is [8294400] bytes
    MAPPING> CMN_1792 The data cache size that would hold [31568] rows in the lookup table for [mplt_SIL_PurchaseCostFact.Lkp_W_GL_ACCOUNT_D_Gl_Account_Wid], in memory, is [14376960] bytes
    MAPPING> CMN_1793 The index cache size that would hold [99] rows in the lookup table for [mplt_SIL_PurchaseCostFact.Lkp_Codes_UOM], in memory, is [14000] bytes
    MAPPING> CMN_1792 The data cache size that would hold [99] rows in the lookup table for [mplt_SIL_PurchaseCostFact.Lkp_Codes_UOM], in memory, is [24576] bytes
    MAPPING> CMN_1793 The index cache size that would hold [92117] rows in the lookup table for [mplt_SIL_PurchaseCostFact.Lkp_W_SUPPLIER_D_Supplier_Wid], in memory, is [24115200] bytes
    MAPPING> CMN_1792 The data cache size that would hold [92117] rows in the lookup table for [mplt_SIL_PurchaseCostFact.Lkp_W_SUPPLIER_D_Supplier_Wid], in memory, is [2228224] bytes
    MAPPING> CMN_1793 The index cache size that would hold [1] rows in the lookup table for [mplt_Curcy_Conversion_Rates.GET_GLOBAL_CURR_CODES_AND_RATE_TYPES], in memory, is [20480] bytes
    MAPPING> CMN_1792 The data cache size that would hold [1] rows in the lookup table for [mplt_Curcy_Conversion_Rates.GET_GLOBAL_CURR_CODES_AND_RATE_TYPES], in memory, is [16384] bytes
    MAPPING> CMN_1793 The index cache size that would hold [0] rows in the lookup table for [Lkp_W_PURCH_COST_F], in memory, is [20480] bytes
    MAPPING> CMN_1792 The data cache size that would hold [0] rows in the lookup table for [Lkp_W_PURCH_COST_F], in memory, is [16384] bytes
    MAPPING> CMN_1793 The index cache size that would hold [1] rows in the lookup table for [mplt_Get_Etl_Proc_Wid.LKP_ETL_PROC_WID], in memory, is [2800] bytes
    MAPPING> CMN_1792 The data cache size that would hold [1] rows in the lookup table for [mplt_Get_Etl_Proc_Wid.LKP_ETL_PROC_WID], in memory, is [16384] bytes
    MANAGER> PETL_24005 Starting post-session tasks. : (Thu May 26 17:47:10 2011)
    MANAGER> PETL_24029 Post-session task completed successfully. : (Thu May 26 17:47:10 2011)
    MAPPING> TE_7216 Deleting cache files [PMLKUP11186_25W32] for transformation [Lkp_W_PURCH_COST_F].
    MAPPING> TE_7216 Deleting cache files [PMLKUP11186_524289W32] for transformation [mplt_Get_Etl_Proc_Wid.LKP_ETL_PROC_WID].
    MAPPING> TE_7216 Deleting cache files [PMLKUP11186_1507331W32] for transformation [mplt_Curcy_Conversion_Rates.GET_GLOBAL_CURR_CODES_AND_RATE_TYPES].
    MAPPING> TE_7216 Deleting cache files [PMLKUP11186_1572874W32] for transformation [mplt_SIL_PurchaseCostFact.Lkp_W_Inventory_Product_D_Inventory_Prod_Wid].
    MAPPING> TE_7216 Deleting cache files [PMLKUP11186_2031617W32] for transformation [MPLT_LKP_W_SUPPLIER_PRODUCT_D.LKP_W_SUPPLIER_PRODUCT_D_Primary].
    MAPPING> TE_7216 Deleting cache files [PMLKUP11186_1572876W32] for transformation [mplt_SIL_PurchaseCostFact.Lkp_W_Employee_D_Requestor_Wid].
    MAPPING> TE_7216 Deleting cache files [PMLKUP11186_1572865W32] for transformation [mplt_SIL_PurchaseCostFact.Lkp_W_PRODUCT_D_Product_Wid].
    MAPPING> TE_7216 Deleting cache files [PMLKUP11186_1572867W32] for transformation [mplt_SIL_PurchaseCostFact.Lkp_W_GL_ACCOUNT_D_Gl_Account_Wid].
    MAPPING> TE_7216 Deleting cache files [PMLKUP11186_1572878W32] for transformation [mplt_SIL_PurchaseCostFact.Lkp_W_Cost_Center_D_Cost_Center_Wid].
    MAPPING> TE_7216 Deleting cache files [PMLKUP11186_1572866W32] for transformation [mplt_SIL_PurchaseCostFact.Lkp_W_PROFIT_CENTER_D_Profit_Center_Wid].
    MAPPING> TE_7216 Deleting cache files [PMLKUP11186_1572868W32] for transformation [mplt_SIL_PurchaseCostFact.Lkp_Codes_UOM].
    MAPPING> TE_7216 Deleting cache files [PMLKUP11186_1572869W32] for transformation [mplt_SIL_PurchaseCostFact.Lkp_W_SUPPLIER_D_Supplier_Wid].
    MAPPING> TM_6018 Session [SIL_PurchaseCostFact_Full] run completed with [0] row transformation errors.
    MANAGER> PETL_24002 Parallel Pipeline Engine finished.
    DIRECTOR> PETL_24012 Session run completed successfully.
    DIRECTOR> TM_6022

    There is another log file for Informatica that will give you detailed information on the issue. You should be looking into that log file.

  • IDOC RSRQST is getting stuck frequently, it leads to delay in data loading

    hi,
    we are using SAP R/3 4.7 E and SAP Netweaver 2004s as BI server .
    On daily basis we are loading the data from R/3 to BI system . we are facing problems in data loading
    IDOC RSRQST is getting stuck frequently, which leads to delay in data loading..
    Please guide me to resolve this issue .
    Thanks in advance .

    Thanks for your reply kumarsen   . I have gone through the referred forum .
    In my case , I have checked the TRFC,  conncetivity between R/3 and BW  and Job scheduled as priority C .
    Still many Idocs are got stuck in R/3 [approx every 5 min once] . we are releasing the Idoc's through BD87 only .
    Please suggest for some permanent solution .

  • Is Apple not aware of all the users getting stuck in BACKUP loading OS 5?

    I know I'm not the only person running PC XP that is getting stuck in Backing up your iPhone purgatory!!!  This is the third morning I've checked my iPhone 4 after letting it attempt to update ALL NIGHT LONG.  It has been sitting on my desk, connected with the backup window running blue left to right with no apparent progress in updating.  I click on STOP and it says it's cancelling the update but then it gets stuck.  Can't stop it, can't close the window and have to end up using Task manager to stop the application.  3 attempts - 3 completely identical set of results.  I've been updating and syncing since iPhone 2 without any issue.  Now the supposedly wonderful update doesn't work.  I am saddened by the loss of Steve Jobs, the man the visionary.  I've never had an issue with any of my 5 iPhones (2G 4GB, 2G 8GB, 3G 16GB, 3GS 32GB and this 4G 16GB).  I'm lost because I've never had to think about discussing a problem.  I've googled my issue and other than older posts related to previous OS issues, my issue seems to be relatively new.  HELP!!!!

    The phone you bought is NOT unlocked. The seller lied.

  • Desperate user need help. My GPIB instrument get stuck with my labview program frequently

    Hello to all labview users,
    i am a beginner in using labview. I am currently writting a labview program to automatically control a digital control rotator HD201e and a network analyzer 8720a to work with the anechoic chamber. The program receives an initial position, amount of increment and # of steps. My program will then ask the controller to rotate to the initial position and at the meantime, the program will monitor the position of the rotator to ensure the requested position is reached. After that, at the position, the program will ask the NA to perform a reading of the measurement. Once the reading is done, the program will ask the controller to rotate to the next position and does a reading of the measurement and so on.
    My program seems to be able to perform the tasks; however, the dig.controller part seems to get stuck around 50% of the time when running the program. Sometimes, even the controller receives the requested position (can be seen from the lcd screen of the controller), the rotator just simply would not rotate; also, sometimes, the controller just simply does not respond when sending the command of moving a position, as in the debug mode (the one with a lightbulb), i see that i got "ok" on all the blocks in the writing portion ofthe program, but the controller just doesnt seem to receive the position (as seen no new position received from the lcd screen) and the cursor on the lcd screen blinks weirdly, due to that problem, my program will then get stuck in an infinite loop.....
    Usually, that problem occurs after few positions have been reached.....
    so, when that happens, i have to stop my program and re-run it. that means the program will have to re-do the measurement that were read previously....
    sometimes i have to stop and re-run my program several times to get all the measurement of all the positions done.....so...that bug renders that program to be an unefficient program.
    I have been trying to resolve that bug for weeks...but no success....i have tried to put some wait time between each block....result is not much different...
    I have also tried putting "clear" block before and after the "write" block.....same problem.....
    I have heard that the serial GPIB "flush" block may help...but i tried..but it seems the controller doesnt recognize/accept flush....
    i have also tried using the "Visa open" and "Visa close" block to see if ithat reduces the stucking thing....but seems that the controller can still get stuck....
    i have also even tried using "lock asyn" and "unlock asyn" block...but didnt seem to work....
    Has anyone experienced such problem.? Is it a known problem with some gpib instrument?
    Is there any discrepancy or bugs in my program that i am unaware of that causes this problem?
    Any advice and or opinion would be greatly appreciated....
    PS: i attached the controller part of my program and the overall program
    desperate happyguy......
    Happy guy
    ~ currently final year undergraduate in Electrical Engr. Graduating soon! Yes!
    ~ currently looking for jobs : any position related to engineering, labview, programming, tech support would be great.
    ~ humber learner of LabVIEW lvl: beginner-intermediate
    Attachments:
    HD201_Controld.jpg ‏231 KB
    AChamber_Measurements_v1d.jpg ‏857 KB
    AChamber_Measurements_v1d3.jpg ‏463 KB

    hi xseadog
    i got what you meant about the gpib reference
    actually, that final frame works because the gpib reference is already done inside that subvi.
    but my problem doesnt arise from that. most of the time ive seen, it arises between the writing frame and the while loop frame. as i mentionned, sometimes. the controller just simply doesnt rotate even i can see the requested position display on the controller lcd screen; also sometimes, just the controller is stuck without acknowledging the write position command. but in labview...while in debug mode. it is shown ok on the block.
    Happy guy
    ~ currently final year undergraduate in Electrical Engr. Graduating soon! Yes!
    ~ currently looking for jobs : any position related to engineering, labview, programming, tech support would be great.
    ~ humber learner of LabVIEW lvl: beginner-intermediate
    Attachments:
    HD-201 RPosd.jpg ‏39 KB

  • Hanging and getting stuck when uploading

    This has happened a few times now
    FCPX gets stuck uploading
    It doesnt move from the percentage mark its stuck on
    It becomes unresponsive to clicks
    I have to force close
    Also... I suspect that the job gets finished...
    When I tried to reupload a task that I thought it got stuck on... I got a message on youtube saying I had uploaded duplicate content
    Any ideas?
    Thanks
    Omar

    Hey Omar
    Some of the issues can be addressed by checking out the basic troubleshooting article to ensure everything is installed and up to date.
    Final Cut Pro X: Troubleshooting basics
    http://support.apple.com/kb/ts3893
    Thanks for using Apple Support Communities.
    Regards,
    -Norm G.

  • TP getting stucked due to error:

    Hello friends,
    I have a problem on my SAP system:
    ERROR: The following call returned with exit code 127:
    ERROR: sapevt SAP_TRIGGER_RDDIMPDP -t
    ERROR: Background jobs cannot be started.
    ERROR: Please check trace file dev_evt.
    the tp is always getting stucked.
    Any ideas please ?
    Moderator message: not directly related to ABAP development, please have a look in the SAP Netweaver Administrator or Software Logistics forums.
    Edited by: Thomas Zloch on Aug 22, 2011 2:26 PM

    I was facing the same issue,
    My problem was because the job was executing in other application server.
    I had to schedule the job on the Central Instance and it worked fine.
    Regards.

  • Workflow Timer Job Is Stuck( 0% Progress and Running Continuously )

    We are facing strange issue in sandbox. Workflow timer job in central admin (CA) is getting stuck.workflow time interval is 2 minutes.
    It supposes to run for every two minutes. But it stuck after the start. It is not resume (or) complete the job. It is showing 0% progress and running status.
    We need to restart the SharePoint2010 Timer Service to restart the timer job.
    When we restart the “SharePoint 2010 Timer”, Workflow timer job gets re started. But again it is stuck.
    So whenever we need to run workflows I need to restart the “SharePoint 2010 Timer” service.
    I have re created my site collection and delete the local list (which has workflow association).
    But Workflow timer job in CA not resumed (or) completed.
    Are there any options to reset the workflow timer job? Is there any way to clear state of workflow timer job?

    i have got same problem in my SharePoint Server
    for  Microsoft SharePoint Foundation Usage Data Import,
    Config Refresh
    workflow
    so i have read most of notes.
    Clearing the cache is the best resolving part for this.
    To resolve this issue, clear the file system cache on all servers in the server farm on which the Windows SharePoint Services Timer service is running. To do this, follow these steps:
    Stop the
    Timer service. To do this, follow these steps:
    Click Start, point to Administrative Tools, and then click Services.
    Right-click SharePoint 2010 Timer services, and then clicks Stop.
    Close the Services console.
    Navigate to the directory:C:\ProgramData\Microsoft\SharePoint\Config
    \GUID.
    Backup the GUID folder
    Back up the Cache.ini file. (Make a copy of it. DO NOT DELETE THIS FILE, Only the XML files in the next step)
    Delete all the XML configuration files in the GUID folder (DO NOTE DELETE
    THE FOLDER). Do this so that you can verify that the GUID folders content is replaced by new XML configuration files when the cache is rebuilt.  Note when you empty the configuration cache in the GUID folder; make sure that you do NOT delete
    the GUID folder and the Cache.ini file that is located in the GUID folder.
    Double-click the Cache.ini file.
    On the Edit menu, click Select All.
    On the Edit menu, click Delete.
    Type 1, and then click Save on the File menu. (Basically when you are done, the only text in the config.ini
    file should be the number 1)
    On the File menu, click Exit.
    Start the Timer service. To do this, follow these steps:
    Click Start, point to Administrative Tools, and then click Services.
    Right-click SharePoint 2010
    Timer, and then click Start.
    Close the Services console.
    Note The file system cache is re-created after you perform this procedure. Make sure that you perform this procedure on all servers in the server farm.
    Make sure that the Cache.ini file in the GUID folder now contains its previous value. For example, make sure that the value of the Cache.ini file is not
    1.
    Check in the GUID folder to make sure that the xml files are repopulating. This may take a bit of time.
    Deepesh Yevle - MCTS MCITP

  • Photoshop Bug: Sliders getting stuck to mouse after release (Mac OS)

    When dragging various sliders in Photoshop CS5, very often these sliders get "stuck" and move with the mouse even though you have released the mouse. Say you are dragging a slider to set the brush opacity to 50%. When you have set it to 50%, you release the mouse and move it away from the slider, only to find that the opacity still increases or decreases as you move your mouse. You have to click again to fix this, but then of course you have to go back and do it again.
    Below is a small illustration (I can't take a screenshot of my mouse) of an example of when this happens:
    This happens to me around once every 5 times I use a slider, i.e. extremely often. As you can imagine, it's very annoying and frustrating.
    I use a Wacom Bamboo Fun tablet, and I never use Photoshop without it so I cannot confirm whether this bug happens with a mouse or just the tablet.
    It doesn't just happen like on the above illustration, but also with any slider such as those in Adjustment Layers and Filters.
    The bug does not happen when using tools on the canvas (thankfully). So the Brush tool, and every other tool, works fine and never gets "stuck".
    I have the latest version of Photoshop CS5.
    This is a bug that has always been in CS5 since the first version, and it has not been in previous versions of Photoshop.
    Does anyone else have this issue? Anyone else with a Tablet?
    I know there are large amounts of similar, extremely annoying bugs in CS5, but this one is just driving me crazy.
    Late 2008 15" MacBook Pro
    OS X Snow Leopard 10.6.7 (but the problem has existed way before 10.6.7)
    Photoshop CS5 version 12.0.2

    Chris—I'm sincerely sorry that you were called at home on a holiday weekend about my post.  Sincerely.  I'm sorry.  That shouldn't have happened, and I apologize for that.
    I do ask that you also understand that I spent my entire weekend trouble-shooting this issue—which is now several months old—while waiting for an answer or at least a respectful and helpful response of some sort.  Here we are with another week down the tubes and still have yet to receive some sort of expression of an Adobe employee taking my case seriously.  I don't know if you—or anyone else—is investigating this.  As best I can tell, you are not—and I base that on the series of confusing (and in some cases, patently false) assertions that you made regarding the facts of this matter—including confidently promoting the notion that this is not a problem with Photoshop CS5 (which it clearly is), and the notion that I hadn't done anything to narrow down the list of possible causes—which I clearly have.  If you disagree, as you claim to, with either of those statements—then the very least you (or someone at Adobe) can do is to take ten minutes out of your schedule to draft a proper, logical and honest assesment of why you have come to those conclusions.  I don't think that's asking too much at all.  In fact, it's very disappointing that I've had to expend as much effort as I have to deal with this issue—and I still don't have an official, "right on, we're working on it," from you guys.
    If you want to make a case that it was abusive of me to telling you that Layer Styles was likely the cause of this issue—go right ahead.  I admit that my entire statement was a bit "hot," but you have yet to even acknowledge the validity of my concern—much less the tremendous effort I've undertaken at my own personal expense (and at your/Adobe's benefit) to contribute to the resolution of this problem... or the real-world dollars and opportunity cost to my creative reputation.  Do you have many other users who go to these lengths when identifying bugs?  I doubt it.  As I've told you in another thread—if you've heard from me, it's only after I've already expended significant effort trying to solve the problem on my own.  I don't whine about stuff and ask other people to fix it, if I can fix it myself.  But I can't.  I'm not a programmer, and I don't know how to run any diagnostics on my own—although trust me—I've tried.  I've tried Xcode, and learning Applescript to see if I could craft my own workaround or identify the issue with even greater clarity.  But I don't know either of those technologies, and it's not work that I should be doing anyway.  There is a reason that a CS5 Design Master license costs upwards of $2,500, right?  I've gotten much more attentive and respectful response from free apps than I've gotten from Adobe over this issue.  What is that license for, if not for respectful customer service?
    I have never received a paycheck from Adobe, Chris.  I receive (small) paychecks when I get my work done—which I have not been able to do for over a week now... and this is not the first time that has happened as a result of this bug.  And the week before this reappeared, I spent a significant amount of time testing out CS6 and taking notes to share with you and your development team—for no other reason that that I know this program inside and out (or at least large portions of it), and want to contribute to it in any way I can.  So yeah... I was angry.  Truthfully—I still am.  My paycheck isn't even the reason I do what I do.  I do what I do because it fulfills me on an emotional and spiritual level—which I stated in my very first post back in April.  Suffice to say—I feel spiritually and emotionally drained right now.  I'm just so incredibly exhausted, having spent the last couple hours nearly driven to tears by the combination of a fulll week of never-ending frustration, the loss of an important client and my favorite project, and what seems to be a total disregard for my case by you and whomever else from Adobe has read these posts without taking action to begin bringing about resolution.
    Again—if you have a case to make, then make it.  Thus far, you've said a few things which made it seem like either a) you haven't even read the top-line details of my detailed reports, or b) that you are determined to squash me—not the bug.  I've explained why I've come to those conclusions very clearly.  Your assertion that I hadn't narrowed anything down is so demonstrably false that I consider that to be an abusive statement.  Your mention of Wacom drivers and third-party-related possibilities right after I'd spent about an hour composing a post (following up on a couple of days worth of volunteer trouble-shooting) detailing to the nth degree why it absolutely could not be either one of those things is totally perplexing, to the point where it make so little sense that someone of your presumed intelligence (i.e. a big-shot developer for one of the worlds most well-known applications) could actually respond that way after reading any part of what I'd just wrote.  It makes no sense.  Either you didn't read it, or you did read it, and you had a reason for making a statement that you knew wasn't in line with the facts of the matter.  I don't know which one it is, but it's one of those things, unless I'm totally missing something.
    You have offered a few terse responses to my very detailed reports—and in the few short sentences that you've wrote, you've made many statements that have no effect on pushing the issue forward or getting it closer to resolution.  I don't want it to be a personal issue—but I don't feel like I made it personal until you did.  Yes, my statments were direct and pointed—but at least they've been transparent, articulate and well-explained.  You continue to speak about things like my continued accusations, your weekend, the TOS of the forum, and all sort of things that only exacerbate an already-painful, already-costly issue.  I've told you that I am determined to get resolution on this issue—and I am serious.  I will not accept blanket dismissals, and I will not be intimidated into backing down from my demand for a resolution.  I have helped you get as far as I can get on my own, and I am willing to continue to help in any way I can.
    I quit a very high-paying job 4 years ago to pursue a career as a designer.  I make next to nothing now, but I feel fullfilled because of the creative process.  This bug has prevented me from all fulfillment.  It has strained my personal and professional relationships, and has taken a heavy emotional toll on me.  Please step up and make an effort to get it resolved—or at least assign someone else to solve it.  I can provide whatever you need from my end—and again, I'm sorry for your phone call this weekend.
    -Jason

  • Imac gets stuck on spinning circle when shutting down

    I have had my mac for only 1 year and still getting use to the troubleshooting. My Imac keeps getting stucking on spinning circle when I shut down or reboot. I have unplugged all my external hard drives and printer. Nothing seemed to work. Can someone point me in the right direction.
    Mac OS X Lion 10.7.4 (11E53)
    4gb Ram
    Processor  2.5 GHz Intel Core i5

    You might want to make sure that there are no open applications when you shut down, one of them may be hanging your Mac trying to shut down. Another thing to look for is to make sure that there are no print jobs that are not complete. Open the print and scan preference pane, double click your printer and see if any things hanging there.

  • When making a call, sometimes, my iPhone 5 , gets stuck on 'Calling' than I have to press END..but still nothing happens, than when I press HOME button, the call app keeps running in the background and it keeps saying CALLING... please help

    When making a call, sometimes, my iPhone 5 , gets stuck on 'Calling' than I have to press END..but still nothing happens, than when I press HOME button, the call app keeps running in the background and it keeps saying CALLING... than I have to wait 2 - 3 minutes and call again.
    please help

    Has nothing to do with the SIM or master reset.  This has been done to my phone.  The SIM once and the factory reset many times over.  You all just sold us a bad piece of equipment and have us by the tail with our contracts so none of us can get a new phone without paying full price or re-upping our contract.  I just got off the phone last night with your high up tech people (you know, the hidden number we get once we tear into your support people enough), they went into my phone again and still didn't find anything wrong.  I about got fired from my job for not getting my calls and texts.  The BBB has now been contacted, and I feel your end should shore this up for all of us!

  • HP Deskjet 5568 WiFi Printer - Last page gets stuck while printing

    I bought a HP Deskjet 5568 two days ago. I have printed nearly 50 pages already.
    I am having a problem while printing "manually" on both sides. It prints the odd pages first from back to front. While printing the last page (the first page of the document), the printer gets stuck. The page is halfway in and the printer just stays there. If I pull out the page, the 'orange' resume light blinks; if I press it, the printing restarts.
    The problem is that after it gets stuck, the printer doesn't print anything. I have to delete the print job and now I have to print the other 'even' pages myself.
    Please help me. Is the paper getting stuck part of the printing process (stupid question)? I don't actually think it's getting "stuck," I think the printer doesn't allow the page to come out for some reason as the page is actually fully printed (the data is all there).
    I have also noticed that this only happens while printing in "manual" two-sided mode.
    Also, I can't edit the printing shortcuts in the printer control panel. If I change the paper size to A4, the next time I open the control panel, it is once again set to Letter. Why is this? 

    Hi I_am_Ann,
    I understand you are having an issue printing from the computer on your HP Deskjet Ink Advantage 2515 All-in-One Printer.
    I do need some other information to assist you.
    The current OS installed?
    Did you install the printer on your computer?
    This document should help take a look at the printer to make sure all is ok.
    http://h10025.www1.hp.com/ewfrf/wc/document?docname=c03243075&tmp_task=solveCategory&cc=us&dlc=en&lc...
    Please feel free to contact me if you have other questions
    Thanks
    Please click “Accept as Solution ” if you feel my post solved your issue, it will help others find the solution.
    Click the “Kudos, Thumbs Up" on the bottom to say “Thanks” for helping!

  • New printer prints fine from web, gets stuck sending data from all Adobe CS2 programs

    I'm trying to print envelopes on a Lexmark x5650 I just bought. Things can print just fine from all sources but as soon as I try to print from InDesign CS2 the print manager just shows "sending data" and doesn't do anything else. In fact, the same thing happens from all Adobe programs. If I pause the job and start it again then it gets stuck "opening printer connection". I deleted all my other printers so there weren't any other print jobs anywhere else. Help me please!
    Side note, when I reinstall the printer the help assistant it tells me at one point that there are print jobs running and I have to cancel them to fnish the install. For the life of me I cannot find this print job, it's no where to be seen in the system preferences printer section.

    If you did not, then that's the reason it isn't working. Do it. Make sure that the specific printer is selected in Page Setup and then check the Printer Features under the Printer button.
    Ignore the dire warnings that pop-up when you click those buttons.
    It should not be necessary to go to PDF first.
    Dave

Maybe you are looking for