JoinFieldValue for Account record type.

I am trying to validate Account record type field using below JFV function. Will this work,
JoinFieldValue('<Opportunity>', '<OpportunityId>', '<IndexedPick0>') <> 'Yes' , display customer error message.
Sundar

thanks for reply..
I have field "Result" (IndexedPick0) in opportunity. User can modify Account type to Customer only if associated opportunity Result is "Yes - Pick Up". otherwise display customer error message. To configure this, I want to get opportunity Result field value using JVF and display error message.
JoinFieldValue('<Opportunity>', '<OpportunityId>', '<IndexedPick0>') <> 'Yes - Pick Up' in Account Type field

Similar Messages

  • Best Practices to update Cascading Picklist mapping for Account record type

    1. Most of the existing picklist values name in parent and related picklist has been modified in external app master list, so the same needs to be updated in CRMOD.
    2. If we need to update picklist value, do we need to DISABLE the existing value and CREATE a new picklist.
    3. Is there any Best Practices to avoid doing Manual Cascading picklist mapping for Account record type? because we have around 500 picklist values to be mapped with parent and related picklist.
    Thanks!

    Mahesh, I would recommend disabling the existing values and create new ones. This means manually remapping the cascading picklists.

  • Where can I find the user key precedence hierarchy for each record type?

    Example: I want to update contact records through the CRMOD web service API.
    So I'm looking at the "Oracle Web Services On Demand Guide, Version 6.0 (released August 2010)", page 316, and it lists 3 user keys for Contact.wsdl v2.0 in the following order:
    1. FirstName and LastName
    2. Id
    3. ExternalSystemId
    From what I can see, this order does not seem to reflect the precedence hierarchy of these 3 user keys.
    I've send in a test update where I supplied a FN, LN, and EUID, ... and the contact that matched the EUID got updated.
    (I'm glad it did, because EUID really needs to take precedence over FN+LN, otherwise you could never change a contact's last name without knowing the contact's Row Id.)
    Does anyone know where I can find the precedence hierarchy for each record type's user keys (other than doing the obvious and time consuming "try+error")?

    Hi,
    we experienced similar problems with the account object and asked the oracle support about this. This was their answer:
    "[...] thank you for contacting CRM On Demand Customer Care. Regarding your question, please note the below: when perfoming a query, the user key fields are looked for in this order: - Row id - External System Id - AccountName and Location. Basically, the search will be performed by AccountName and Location only when the other fields are missing. This is an expected behavior because, the Row Id is the strongest filter as it is always unique. The external system Id comes second, as it is supposed to be unique in another system."
    So, I guess the order is always
    1) Row Id
    2) External System Id
    3) specific field combinations...
    kind regards
    Kai
    Edited by: Kai Hartmann on 28.04.2011 07:10

  • Validation Rule for Accounting Document type

    Hello Experts
       I have an requirement  to block certain accounting doc type to get vendor line item post in that. For that I tried to block direct through OBA7 but not be able to also can't delete number range as it is shared by another doc type. My last option is Validation rule but i never work on this ,so any suggest how to create validation rule " To Block Accounting Doc type SO THAT THERE WILL NOT BE ANY line item posting occur in that doc type.
    Regards.

    ok sure.  OB28 callpoint 1.  Create a step under this callpoint.
    1)  Prerequisite is as follows:  note XXXX is your company code and ZZ is your doc type.
    BKPF-BUKRS = 'XXXX' AND
    BKPF-BLART = 'ZZ'
    2)  Then you need to enter the check.  Here you can just put FALSE.
    3)  The last part is to create your message.  Message type E so they get an error and then create a message number in the class that you choose and give it a description:
    Document Type 'ZZ' is not allowed
    Save it and wah lah! 
    Let me know how it goes.
    Thanks,
    Jes

  • How to create outbound IDOC for Accounting document type RV

    Hello All,
    We have a requirement to create a downpayment request for a customer. We have copied the FAZ billing type and created a ZFAZ. For this the accounting document type generated is RV. This RV is a statistical document and does not contain any debits and credit entries. It is just to inform the customer to pay. We have to generate an IDOC for the same. I have configured FIDCC1 standard FI message type for this in ALE. But it does not seem to work.
    Does anyone have any inputs on this ? May be RV does not use the message type FIDCC1 ? Anything in relation to RV or downpaymnts, please let me know..
    Appreciate your responses.
    Thanks
    SH.

    Hello Alpesh,
    I tried adding breakpoints to the following userexits and many other places where they occur..but while creating billing doc FAZ nor while generating accounting document RV they were triggered.
    I have created a distribution model and created the partner profile with outbound for basic type INVOIC02 for message type INVOIC . What do you say?
    Just a note that this is an outbound process and i cannot use process codes.
    - EXIT_SAPLVEDF_001 User_Exit controll data IDoc_Output_Invoic
    - EXIT_SAPLVEDF_002 User_Exit customer enhancement of segments outbound invoice
    Thanks
    Smitha
    Edited by: Smitha H on Jul 25, 2008 7:56 AM

  • ROW_ID for account record was always 10 characters - now 12 characters?

    Well, we created our first account record in 2008 and it was assigned a 12-character row ID, where all of the other records have a 10-character row ID. This is forcing us to resize the fields in our web services app. Is anyone aware of this change? Will it change again?

    Yes it may change again for a number of reasons. Oracle reserves the right to change this at any time, unannounced, as environments scale and change. I Would recommend that you change the integration as soon as possible to accommodate a 15 character minimum support structure. Optimally, 30 characters.

  • How to pass parameter in sql developer for debubing record type

    DECLARE
      IB_BP_BANK_ACCOUNT_BUF PL/SQL RECORD;  ---record type
      IP_BP_ID NUMBER;
      IOP_ACC_SEQ_NO NUMBER;
      OP_ERROR VARCHAR2(200);
    BEGIN
      IB_BP_BANK_ACCOUNT_BUF := NULL;
      IP_BP_ID := NULL;
      IOP_ACC_SEQ_NO := NULL;
      ORAGTW11.MAINTAIN_BP_BANK(
        IB_BP_BANK_ACCOUNT_BUF => IB_BP_BANK_ACCOUNT_BUF,
        IP_BP_ID => IP_BP_ID,
        IOP_ACC_SEQ_NO => IOP_ACC_SEQ_NO,
        OP_ERROR => OP_ERROR
      /* Legacy output:
    DBMS_OUTPUT.PUT_LINE('IOP_ACC_SEQ_NO = ' || IOP_ACC_SEQ_NO);
      :IOP_ACC_SEQ_NO := IOP_ACC_SEQ_NO;
      /* Legacy output:
    DBMS_OUTPUT.PUT_LINE('OP_ERROR = ' || OP_ERROR);
      :OP_ERROR := OP_ERROR;
    END;

    Something like this:
    Assuming you have a procedure like this:
    CREATE OR REPLACE PROCEDURE abc (p_emp emp%ROWTYPE)
    IS
    BEGIN
       DBMS_OUTPUT.put_line (p_emp.empno);
    END;
    Then you have to call it from a PL/SQL Block in this way i.e.:
    DECLARE
      v_emp emp%ROWTYPE;
    BEGIN
      SELECT *
        INTO v_emp
        FROM emp
       WHERE ROWNUM<=1;
       abc(v_emp);
    END;
    Regards.
    Al

  • JoinFieldValue for Account Team

    Hi,
    I am in Opportunities, and I want to call to an Account Team field (the email of the user that is in the account team). Do you know how can I do it?, or how to use the JoinFieldValue in this case?
    Thanks,
    Francisco.
    Edited by: user12993554 on 17/09/2010 13:19

    I don't think you can access Account Team from Opportunity. You can only access fields from Account object.
    JoinFieldValue works based on the RowId value.

  • Look in Selector Default for Record Types

    Is it possible to set a Look in Selector Default for each record type? For example, I'd like the Look in Selector default for account, contact, and opportunity to be defaulted to All but the Look in Selector default for Custom Object 1 to default to a specifc book we defined. I know that I can set the default look in selector for a given user but not sure if it can be set for a specific record type.

    At this time it is not possible to set the Look in Selector by record type.

  • Workflow for record type = User

    Hi All,
    I would like to create an WF for record type = 'User' that will update one 'User' object field based on the value entered in other 'User' object field.
    Simple to do for any record type except 'User' which is not an option in the Workflow Rule New record type LOV, any ideas for an workaround here?
    10x,
    AlexD.

    Hi Alex, unfortunately I have no answer, but I´m looking for something similar. I want to link object fields of the user´s direct manager to the appropriate object fields of the user. I don´t wanna save the values via a workflow, as the value should be dynamic if it changes in the user profile of the manager.
    If this could be combined with a dynamic user layout for the administrator it would enable perfect user management. Does anyone have an idea? Many thanks, Joerg

  • Can a field validation point to fields of another record type?

    Field Validation based on another Record Type Field
    I am trying to build validation into a custom object that sums fields under the Account record type.
    The names of the fields from OBI (the table location and field name):
    "- Account Custom Metrics".S_INT_13+"- Account Custom Metrics".S_INT_14+"- Account Custom Metrics".S_INT_11
    My questions: can a field validation point to fields of another record type? My thought was that if OBI can look across record types than all of CRM should be able to, including field validations.
    Thank you,
    David

    Hi !
    I'm afraid this is not possible for the moment. You'll have to wait for the Release 16 I think to have such possibilities.
    The R16 will allow you to create workflow rules accross different record types (e.g. Create a task on the Account linked to the service request when a new service request is created). I hope there will be the same possibilities with the validation rules...
    Hope this will help, feel free to ask more.
    Max

  • ACH CTX - Addenda Record Type 7

    Hi,
    I am working on ACH CTX file for vendor payments through Wells Fargo bank. I need some help on the Addenda Record type 7. The format generated by standard SAP for this record type 7 is not acceptable by the bank. And they are not able to help us out much on what should be the format. All they say is that it should be in ANSI ASC X12 format (payment-related information) and refer NACHA format guidelines. Can anyone tell me what is this NACHA format and what data elements should be passed on in this record type. Is there a specific format I can follow?
    Thanks,
    Raj/

    Hi,
    did you solve this items. Any information would be helpful.
    thanks
    Regards
    PG

  • Flat File with multiple record types (OWB 10.2.0.2)

    Hi!
    I`m using OWB 10.2.0.2 and I`m trying to load a flat file with multiple record types, using SQL LOADER.
    In the flat file editor in the Record tab, I`ve set the type values and the corresponding record names like this:
    Type Value Record Name
    ======== ===========
    T TRAILER
    0 DETAILS
    1 DETAILS
    2 DETAILS
    When using this flat file in a mapping to load the data in a staging table, the generated code looks like this:
    INTO TABLE TRAILER
    TRUNCATE
    REENABLE DISABLED_CONSTRAINTS
    WHEN (1:1) = 'T'
    INTO TABLE DETAILS
    APPEND
    REENABLE DISABLED_CONSTRAINTS
    WHEN (1:1) = '0,1,2'
    The above clause (WHEN (1:1) = '0,1,2') is wrong as I expect one "INTO TABLE..." clause for each record type.
    Could this be a bug or am I doing something wrong?
    Thanks a lot for your help,
    Yorgos

    We`re using two target tables, one for the trailer record and the other for the details records.
    We are facing this problem from the moment we upgraded from OWB 10.1 to OWB 10.2.0.2, so we think it must be something with the way the sql loader code is generated in the new version.
    As our data sources are mainly flat files coming from mainframes, this is a huge problem for us. We even asked an expert in DW from Oracle to help us on this, but still haven`t found a solution.
    Is there any workaround for this or should we forget sql loader and go with an external tables + custom PL/SQL code solution?
    Your help is greatly appreciated Jean-Pierre.
    Regards,
    Yorgos

  • No. range for accounting document

    Hi Friends,
    I want to assign a new no. range for the accounting document. Can you tell how can I do this.
    Regards,
    Wasim.

    Dear Check below transaction for accounting document types and defining number ranges as per document type and period.
    OMBA-Document types
    OBF4-Change document types
    FBN1-define number ranges
    SNRO - Object type number ranges
    Cheers
    KK

  • Inv_reservation_pub.delete_reservation- Record type value

    Hi
    We are using inv_reservation_pvt.delete_reservation api for deleting the reservations. We are unable to identify what value needs to be passed for p_rsv_rec (Record type). Kindly let us know if anyone is aware

    I would avoid using the pvt and instead use the INV_RESERVATION_PUB.DELETE_RESERVATION
    The main parameters for the record type are
    organization_id,
    inventory_item_id
    demand_source_type_id
    demand_source_header_id
    demand_source_line_id
    supply_source_type_id
    subinventory_code
    You may get lucky and be able to delete the reservation with just reservation_id but I have not tried it.
    Hope this helps,
    Sandeep Gandhi

Maybe you are looking for