Joomla! cms and testing on localhost

I am now on DW cs5 and have a simple (I think) question. If running mamp, etc with no issues and using DWcs5 (mac) if I set up a Joomla! 1.5 install in my htdocs in the MAMP folders, and then (here's the core of the question) set up my local files in my usual directory on another part of my hard drive, do I need to install the whole of the Joomla install fileset to both my local and also  testing folders? (This question does not arise with previous versions nor other Web Design Software as they have not got the (wonderful!) "Live VIew/Live Code and other dynamic cms facilities available in DW cs5. I am a little confused. It seems to me that the answer must be that for me to edit a local copy of, eg, index.php then ask it to use Live View/Live Code, when it may well need to access other Joomla files in other parts of the testing MAMP server folders means that both local and testing server folders need the full install-especialy with third party templates such as Rockettheme that use the Gantry Framework. Can anyone advise me please? Thank you.

The normal way to test dynamic websites in Dreamweaver is to use the same folder for both local files and testing server. Set up your local site in htdocs. Otherwise, Dreamweaver needs to copy the files and dependent files every time you test something.

Similar Messages

  • Setup of Customer Dev and Test environment

    Customer wants to set up a Dev and Test env for Apex on the same machine. Been trying to wrap my head around the way to do this. Seems like these are the options:
    1) Separate databases, Two APEX homes, Two HTTP Servers
    2) One database, different Workspaces, One APEX home, One HTTP Server
    # 1 is the most 'pristine' from the perspective of separation of everything (and patching), but #2 seems like a more manageable environment. Only down side I see to #2 is that DEV can never have a newer release of APEX than TEST.
    BTW -the customer wants TEST to look like PROD except during code push time. They also want TEST env refreshed regularly from PROD in between code releases.
    Suggestions? Other options?
    Thanks,
    Dwight

    Hello Dwight,
    Check your dads.conf file. There is something like this:
    <Location /pls/apex>
    Order deny,allow
    PlsqlDocumentPath              docs
    AllowOverride                  None
    PlsqlDocumentProcedure         wwv_flow_file_mgr.process_downloadd
    PlsqlDatabaseConnectString     localhost:1521:XE ServiceNameFormat
    PlsqlNLSLanguage               AMERICAN_AMERICA.AL32UTF8
    PlsqlAuthenticationMode        Basic
    SetHandler                     pls_handler
    PlsqlDocumentTablename         wwv_flow_file_objects$
    PlsqlDatabaseUsername          APEX_PUBLIC_USER
    PlsqlDefaultPage               apex
    PlsqlDatabasePassword          apex_public_user
    PlsqlRequestValidationFunction wwv_flow_epg_include_modules.authorize
    Allow from all
    </Location>You can easily change the Location - /pls/apex - to (e.g.) /dev add another Location (/test) and provide it with the different connect strings.
    Then you can access your Dev environment using http://localhost:7778/dev and Test with http://localhost:7778/test.
    You can also change the (default) settings to your /i/ (virtual) directory to point to different dev and test directories.
    Example:
    Alias /dev/ "c:\Oracle\OAS\Apache/dev/images/"
    Alias /tst/ "c:\Oracle\OAS\Apache/test/images/"
    and change the value of the Image Prefix in your Application Definition accordingly.
    Greetings,
    Roel
    http://roelhartman.blogspot.com/
    You can reward this reply by marking it as either Helpful or Correct ;-)

  • CF vs Joomla CMS

    Hi.
    Noob, sorry!
    Currently I have been running joomla 1.5 on our website, http://www.4yacht.com
    We are now searching for alternative solutions to better our user experiences. We find we can do a lot with the current CMS, however we like the flexability on CF in regards to the op system.
    Do you feel that CF might be a better solution for us?
    Thanks

    If the users have not Internet and Information system background,
    forget Joomla.
    Make your own CMS with CF,
    CF is so easy and powerfull to build any system you want.
    Then you can customize your CMS to the user level.
    I have seen so many Joomla users, getting mad with the administration ...
    This is my strategy, I make my own CMS and other packages with CF,
    then you have the full control on fonctionnalities to adapt them to customers levels.
    And they are so happy.
    Pierre.

  • How to integrate Edge Animation into a Joomla-CMS page?

    I tried to integrate an Edge animation into a Joomla site, but there appears just a white page...

    Hi,
    I guess I have two answer on two levels. The wordpress plugin (EdgeSuite) allows you to place compositions inline or use iframes, so it is not really plugin vs. iframes.
    EdgeSuite brings various benefits (if you ask me):
    First of all, it comes down to just uploading stuff, place it, done. No ftp upload, filehandling or whatsoever.
    More over that the plugin enables sharing of core edge libraries. E.g. if you place two compositions on a page without modifying them, all the edge libraries (edge.js, jquery, yep, easings...) will be loaded twice as they sit in different directories. Same with viewing compositions on different pages, each composition loads its own set of libraries. 10 different compositions results in 10x loading of all libs. Edge Suite on the other hand alters the path for the resources and places them in one directory. Libs are only loaded once, for the whole page.
    If you have a simple website cluttering your webspace at root level might be an option. If you are using a CMS and have 10 compositions that is just awful. EdgeSuite places all composition files in a clean file structure within subfolders, no cluttering.
    That's just from the top of my head.
    The iframe topic is a bit more difficult. Personally I think iframes are mostly bad practice. It's like in the early days of the web with table layouts and framesets. There are cases where iframes make total sense and are the best way to go and that's why EdgeSuite can also render iframes. But I personally only want to "see" an iframe when there is no other option. If you can do it inline, do it inline. Bad SEO, loading times, semantic fragmentation... security aspects, sandboxing on the other hand are just a couple of the most common arguments. Most of the arguments don't directly apply to the context of Edge Animate, but still... decide for yourself
    Hope that answers your question to some degree.

  • How do you use a SOA Composite after you have deployed it and tested it?

    I have created a SOA Composite application, deployed it with no problems, and tested and it works. However I am having trouble finding info on what to do next. I really would like to know how to use this SOA Composite application in a web application. I am trying to create an interface that would use the SOA composite. Any links to help would be greatly appreciated.
    This is the only help I have found so far, http://docs.oracle.com/cd/E28271_01/fusionapps.1111/e15524/uc_bpel_bc.htm

    Hi,
    It's a web service call, you go to EM get the WSDL and with it you generate the webservice client for your web application... By calling the web service you will be starting the composite...
    Cheers,
    Vlad

  • Remote and Testing Server Site Definitions

    I am confused about what information I should put in my
    remote site definition info and testing server FTC Host directory
    text boxes. My host placed 3 directories: database, log, and www on
    my server and Dreamweaver placed two directories, Connections and
    _mmServerScripts in the same directory as the above 3. I have
    placed all of my site files, including my home page and folders in
    the www directory and my Access database in the database directory.
    Dreamweaver placed the connection info in the Connections folder an
    d _mmServerScripts in the same directory.
    In order to construct my local site to match the remote site,
    I created a www folder on my local site and placed all of my HTML
    files and supporting folders in it.
    From various Adobe Tech Notes I have read, I was led to
    believe my FTP host directory
    Should be www/. However, when I do this and create a new web
    page on my local site and upload it to my remote site, Dreamweaver
    creates a new www directory inside of the one my host created on
    the remote site and uploads the file to it instead of placing it in
    the www directory my host created. Also, when I use F12 to test my
    page in my browser I get a 404 page not found because Dreamweaver
    placed a www in the page URL that shouldn’t be there and
    after I remove it I’m able to see my page in my browser. My
    URL prefix on my testing server site definition is:
    http://I.P.number.html.
    What am I not doing right?
    Should I use www/ as my FTP host directory or leave it blank?
    Also, what should my URL prefix be?
    Thanks for your help.

    What you need to do is set up so that in the remote server
    you point to the
    www level on the server, and don't replicate this locally.
    Paul Whitham
    Certified Dreamweaver MX2004 Professional
    Adobe Community Expert - Dreamweaver
    Valleybiz Internet Design
    www.valleybiz.net
    "Jim_Moore" <[email protected]> wrote in
    message
    news:[email protected]...
    >I am confused about what information I should put in my
    remote site
    >definition
    > info and testing server FTC Host directory text boxes.
    My host placed 3
    > directories: database, log, and www on my server and
    Dreamweaver placed
    > two
    > directories, Connections and _mmServerScripts in the
    same directory as the
    > above 3. I have placed all of my site files, including
    my home page and
    > folders
    > in the www directory and my Access database in the
    database directory.
    > Dreamweaver placed the connection info in the
    Connections folder an d
    > _mmServerScripts in the same directory.
    >
    > In order to construct my local site to match the remote
    site, I created a
    > www
    > folder on my local site and placed all of my HTML files
    and supporting
    > folders
    > in it.
    >
    > From various Adobe Tech Notes I have read, I was led to
    believe my FTP
    > host
    > directory
    > Should be www/. However, when I do this and create a new
    web page on my
    > local
    > site and upload it to my remote site, Dreamweaver
    creates a new www
    > directory
    > inside of the one my host created on the remote site and
    uploads the file
    > to it
    > instead of placing it in the www directory my host
    created. Also, when I
    > use
    > F12 to test my page in my browser I get a 404 page not
    found because
    > Dreamweaver placed a www in the page URL that shouldn?t
    be there and after
    > I
    > remove it I?m able to see my page in my browser. My URL
    prefix on my
    > testing
    > server site definition is:
    http://I.P.number.html.
    >
    > What am I not doing right?
    > Should I use www/ as my FTP host directory or leave it
    blank?
    > Also, what should my URL prefix be?
    >
    > Thanks for your help.
    >
    >

  • REMOTE AND TESTING INFO

    When I close Dreamweaver 8 it wipes the remote info and
    testing server login and password details for my web sites. Can
    this be avoided? OS Widows XP Professional. Thank you
    Mike Shields

    http://www.adobe.com/cfusion/knowledgebase/index.cfm?id=3491671c
    Murray --- ICQ 71997575
    Adobe Community Expert
    (If you *MUST* email me, don't LAUGH when you do so!)
    ==================
    http://www.dreamweavermx-templates.com
    - Template Triage!
    http://www.projectseven.com/go
    - DW FAQs, Tutorials & Resources
    http://www.dwfaq.com - DW FAQs,
    Tutorials & Resources
    http://www.macromedia.com/support/search/
    - Macromedia (MM) Technotes
    ==================
    "bugle999" <[email protected]> wrote in
    message
    news:fak10s$6p$[email protected]..
    > When I close Dreamweaver 8 it wipes the remote info and
    testing server
    > login and password details for my web sites. Can this be
    avoided? OS
    > Widows XP Professional. Thank you
    >
    > Mike Shields
    >
    >

  • Remote and testing server don't see root relative links the same

    My site works fine on my testing server (Apache, MYSQL,
    PHP). I use root relative links in a library
    file (include file) so that it will work with all pages. For the testing server these links look like this:
    /my_sites_root_folder/aaa/bbb/ccc etc.
    If I use these same links on the remote server they won't work. To get hem to work I have to change all these links to the form
    /aaa/bbb/ccc etc.
    When dreamweaver uploads files to the remote server, the site name folder  (my_sites_root_folder) doesn't go along for the ride--just the files in it. So on the remote all the site files are stored in htdocs. On my testing server, the files are stored in htdocs/my_site_root_folder.
    I think it must have something to do with the way I'm setting up the remote and testing servers, but I'm read a hundred pages of instructions without being able to figure it out. I think I'm just seeing something wrong, but I've already spent days on this. Can someone please point me in the right direction?
    I'm using DWCS5. Internet explorer 8, Windows 7.

    Thank you for your prompt response. I'm afraid I'm still totally puzzled here. It sounds like you're very knowledeable about your comments, but I would like to know more. I accept that using the local site root in links would be bad, but I'm not clear WHY. Structuring the links as I have doesn't cause any links to break. I've structured them this way because it's the only way I can find that everything works. But I still do not understand WHY I have to do it. Using different libary include files doesn't seem like a good way to go, though
    You suggest that if I use any root relative links at all, I need to use vitual hosts. I'm not finding any good coverage of what these are, and especially why they are necessary. If this is the case, does that imply that templates (which use root relative links) also will not work on the test server (at least without vitual hosts)? The conclusion I'm coming up with, given your remarks, is "Dreamweaver doesn't work with root relevant links when you're trying to test a site with a test server." Is this right?

  • Correct idea to scale out testing environment and test service pack2 installation

    Hi
    I have a sharepoint 2010 farm it has one sharepoint server, one database server
    In one server  below services are running
    Central administration service
    SharePoint Server Search 
    User Profile Service 
    Microsoft SharePoint Foundation Web Application
    so i want to scale out this form  to
    1 application server
    1 web front end server
    1 Search server (index server)
    1 databse server
    here how i scale out to this form
    1)here how i move  sharepoint  server search service to new  index server and
    2) here how i move  Microsoft SharePoint Foundation Web Application to new webfront end server
    and in this single server  some web appllications are running also how i move these to new wf server
    i want to do like this  because i want to test service pack 2 installation, now  sharepoint version is : service pack1
    my actual production environment has
    2 application servers
    2 webfront end servers
    2 index servers
    1 databae server
    so this correct idea to scale out testing environment and test service pack2 installation
    adil

    Hi Adil,
    The link below describes how to scale SharePoint Web Front-End with only web applications and the search query server  out of one SharePoint server with all roles running.
    http://sharepointsolutions.com/sharepoint-help/blog/2011/02/how-to-scale-out-a-sharepoint-2010-farm-from-two-tier-to-three-tier-by-adding-a-dedicated-application-server/
    Now you have two SharePoint server with:
    Tier 1 – SharePoint Server dedicated as a Web Front-End (WFE) with only the web application(s) and the search query service running on it
    Tier 2 – SharePoint Server dedicated as an Application Server with all of the other service applications running on it, but no web applications or query service
    Tier 3 – SQL Server for the databases
    Then you would scale out WFE server with web applications from tier1. Now please install a new SharePoint server and join it to the existing farm and deploy it as Web Front Server. Enable the relevant services on Web Front servers per the topology picture
    below, and stop the services running on the old server.
    http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/cc263044(v=office.14).aspx
    Regards
    Rebecca Tu
    TechNet Community Support

  • Development and Test on same machine

    Hi,
    In my current setup I have a development application, a test application and a production application.
    The dev. and test is on the same machine, with different APP ID's. Dev is 102, and test is 110
    At first there was no problems with this. But now all of a sudden it starts to create problems for me. In APEX you can create a coloumn link on an item in a report. In the column link you can set link text, attributes, the page the link links to and you can set items that should be send to the new page.
    The problem that occurs with the link is that APEX uses the APPS name instead of the APP_ID, so that my link will be the same from the development app and the test app. F.x.:
    http://test.test.dk/pls/apex/f?p=APP
    instead of
    http://test.test.dk/pls/apex/f?p=110
    I think that APEX stores some cookie information on the machine that accesses the sites, and the problem hasnt occured untill these cookies ran out.
    I see 2 solutions to this problem:
    1. Install a new server with the development app
    2. Rename the development APP to something different.
    The problem with no 2. is that I will then have to (re) rename the app everytime I release the app to the test server.
    Let me hear some suggestions. How do other people do this?
    Edited by: bjarkekr on 2009-12-22 13:09

    I would recommend separating DEV and TEST into different database instances - they can still be on the same physical server and even share the web server (if you are using Apache/modplsql). All that's needed is a second DAD pointing to the second DB (e.g. your URLs would then look like http://test.test.dk/pls/apexdev/f?p=APP and http://test.test.dk/pls/apextest/f?p=APP if you define a DAD named apexdev to point to the DEV database and a second one named apextest to point to the TEST database).
    If you really have to stick with one DB, then I believe all you need to do is changing the application alias, not the application name itself, for your DEV application (and yes, you would need to change this setting once you migrate from DEV to TEST, but that shouldn't be really that big deal, it's just changing that one setting on the app definition page...). By default the alias is the same as the app name.
    Holger

  • CX_SY_FILE_OPEN_MODE - short dump on production but not in Dev and Test

    Hello,
    I'm getting the follwoing short dump in production when I run the program which writes the data to application server. I have open data set and close data set. Same program when I in development and test I do not get any short dump. Can any know what could be cause for this.
    CX_SY_FILE_OPEN_MODE
    Copy paste of error analysis from ST22 short dump -
    Error analysis
        An exception occurred that is explained in detail below.
        The exception, which is assigned to class 'CX_SY_FILE_OPEN_MODE', was not
         caught in
        procedure "DATA_UPLOAD_APP_SERVER" "(FORM)", nor was it propagated by a RAISING
         clause.
        Since the caller of the procedure could not have anticipated that the
        exception would occur, the current program is terminated.
        The reason for the exception is:
        When accessing the file "/bw/FTPOUT/BPR/OTHER/test.csv", the system recognized
         that this file is
        not open. Therefore, the file cannot be accessed.

    The file could not be OPENed in your production system for a variety of reasons - no authorization, file doesn't exist etc. You should have check sy-subrc right after OPEN DATASET and if not zero, yous should not TRANSFER or READ the file and instead you should have given a message with sy-msgid and sy-msgno which would give you the reason. The dump here is simply saying that OPEN is unsuccessful, so any subsequent READ or TRANSFER would throw runtime dump, if done after an unsuccessful OPEN.

  • One maschine for dev and test

    Hallo,
    i have one maschine for dev and test. i know that it is possible to do this with 2 instances. SAP recommend to separate dev and test on separate maschines. But it is possible. have anyone experiance with that? When i don´t want 2 instances it is possible to have one instance and separate only the systems for dev and test in sld? Have I to copy the business systems, change the servers and make the configurations in integration directory?
    Thanks in advance...
    Frank Schmitt

    Hi Frank,
    one reason for having two systems
    is that you won't be able to import
    directory to your TEST system easily...
    because both r3 (dev and test will have the same integration server - you won't be able to add them to 2 different transport groups... )
    this means that you will have to create almost EVERYTHING
    in the directory twice... 
    at least without doing some tricks...
    make the life of a developer and create 2 servers
    it may cost less then using developers for creating many things twice
    Regards,
    michal

  • How do I get a tech to visit and test my lines?

    I live in Warrandyte (VIC) and it is widely known that our internet service in the suburb is sub-standard.  This is due to a combination of exchange congestion and ageing infrastructure in the street.
    What I need is a technician to visit and test my lines;  (a) at the pole(b) at the 1st point in my house (c) at another point in the house so that I can determine exactly where the issue is with my phone/adsl service What telstra number do I call to get this organised?  

    In some cases they will check the wiring to the first socket, however a lot of houses now have the NBP as the Madison box (or similar). So it's unreasonable to give an expectation of work inside the property. Also because even if you have a first socket as the NBP, they will check the cabling to that but otherwise will check nothing else within the house.
    As soon as you say they will test in the house it sets an expectation and no amount of qualification will be remembered when an ICOF is charged because it's in the dodgy extension cabled patched from the first socket running under the house (or situations like that).

  • SP 2013 Development - How can I Simulate Different Devices to Help Design and Test a New UI?

    Hello Community!
    I am working with SharePoint 2013 and I need to be able to design and test a new design across multiple device browsers.  Does anyone know how to simulate a device browser for design and testing?  BTW, I know about Device Channels, and they give
    me a way to dynamically change my UI for different device browsers, but because this UI is complex, I cannot be sure what dynamic changes need to occur until I can simulate the device browsers and view my new UI in them.
    Thanks!
    Tom
    Tom Molskow - Senior SharePoint Architect - Microsoft Community Contributor 2011 and 2012 Award -
    Linked-In - SharePoint Gypsy

    Hi Tom,
    Because your question is mainly how to simulate different devices, which is more related to SharePoint development, I am moving this thread to
    SharePoint 2013 - Development and Programming forum for better response.
    Best regards,
    We are trying to better understand customer views on social support experience, so your participation in this interview project would be greatly appreciated if you have time. Thanks for helping make community forums a great place.
    Click
    HERE to participate the survey.

  • C240 M3 Stuck at "Configuring and testing memory .."

    Hi,
    This server's just been returned to us from Cisco, who had it on loan since it was new.   We're trying to put it back into service, but have hit the following problem.
    On first power-up the server gets as far as the "Configuring and testing memory .." message.  Just that message, it doesn't show any progress in actually testing memory.   After a few seconds it shuts itself down, then spins up again, repeating that a couple of times before sitting with the "Configuring and testing memory .." message at the top of the screen, but now also showing CIMC IP address at the bottom.   All four LEDs above the power button show steady green,  and the unit ID buttons switch the blue LED on/off as they should.
    I can get to the CIMC login screen, but the password's been changed from default so can't get any further in that direction until we find out the new user/password details.  Unless someone knows how to reset CIMC to default.
    I've tried the following recovery steps ..
    (1) If we set the "Clear CMOS" jumper J2065, the server won't power up.  It powers up to standby, but does not respond on pressing the power button.
    (2) Using the "BIOS recovery" jumper J2068 doesn't appear to have any effect, the server does not read the recovery file from USB flash drive.
    Any ideas?   
    Thanks, 
    Tony S

    Cheers.  There's not much to reseat at this stage.   The server came back with two CPUs of unknown type, I've removed and set those aside in case they're some sort of weird CPU that needs a special memory configuration.
    We've fitted a single E5-2609 as CPU1 and single DIMM in A1.  There are no PCI cards or anything else to reseat.    As a matter of fact the server behaves exactly the same if there's no memory at all, making me think it's hanging up before starting the memory check.
    I would love to get into the CIMC, but does anyone know a way to reset the username/password other than via the BIOS screens (which aren't accessible).
    Thanks, Tony S

Maybe you are looking for