JWS has only 1 bold font for button label

The label on a button should be Monospaced and BOLD,
but it is always the same font (Dialog?) no matter
which font I have specified. The same program shown
as an applet by the browser is correct (shows different
fonts just as I have specified).
Plain fonts are shown correctly both by JWS and the
browser.
Monospaced-Bold is available in JWS as I can see from
another applet of mine.
Peter

The problem has got the bug id 4487363.

Similar Messages

Enh. request: shortcuts support for button labels

Hi Apex team,
it would be nice to enhance shortcuts support for button labels in the next release. There are a lot of standard buttons like 'Cancel', 'Apply Changes', 'Delete', etc. that require translation for each page they appear in global applications.
Thanks.

Hi Arno,
I had a similar issue with trying to create a Nav bar with dynamic content. My solution was to leave all the standard buttons in place and to use setVisible(x) to make them appear or not as required.
BTW have you noticed that rollover behaviour isn't consistant ie works for FIRST/LAST etc but not for FIND/QUERY.
Regards
Andy

Setting bold font for nodes which are not leaf nodes

In JTree, is it possible to set the font for nodes which are not leaf nodes. Can I do this without using custom renderer, or at the most using a DefaultTreeCellRenderer ?
regards,
nirvan

In JTree, is it possible to set the font for nodes which are not leaf nodes. Can I do this without using custom renderer, or at the most using a DefaultTreeCellRenderer ?
regards,
nirvan

Unicode dingbats for button labels?

I really want to use unicode dingbats as my button labels, but Flex won't play ball. Well, not on Windows anyway. It works fine on Mac.
I found a ttf with the unicode dingbats in it called Symbola and embedded it into the swf (as "Symbolax" to make sure it was picking up the embedded version and not the system one). It works fine if I use it for an mx:Text, but it doesn't work as a button label. Example:
    <mx:Button width="30" height="100" label="❯" textRollOverColor="#ffffff" fontFamily="Symbolax"/>
    <mx:Text text="characters are fun ❯" fontFamily="Symbolax" />
Results in:
You can see that the Text control is using the embedded font, but the button label isn't. On Mac, it works fine without embedding any fonts. Help!

Sorry, I just noticed that your button width isn't really wide enough for the text label and it is displaying a tool tip. The toolTip uses the default Arial font (I think), so you'll need to do some CSS-ery to display the tool tip in your specified font if you want it to appear correctly. A slightly better example is probably:
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<mx:Application xmlns:mx="http://www.adobe.com/2006/mxml">
    <mx:Style>
        @font-face {
            src: url("Symbola.otf");
            fontFamily: Symbolax;
            fontWeight: normal;
        Button {
            fontFamily: Symbolax;
            fontWeight: normal;
            textRollOverColor: white;
        Label {
            fontFamily: Symbolax;
        ToolTip {
            fontFamily: Symbolax;
    </mx:Style>
    <mx:Button label="❯" width="30" height="100" />
    <mx:Text text="characters are fun ❯" />
</mx:Application>
Peter

Italic and bold fonts for Hoefler Text are no longer available to MS Word

Apple provides regular, italic, black, and black italic styles for the Hoefler Text font. I've used them before but since I installed Snow Leopard, I cannot creat italic or bold (black) in MS Word. When I make text italic or bold (black), the characters disappear--the sentence shortens as if I had deleted the phrase, but if I change it back to regular, it reappears.
Font Book shows that I have all of these styles of Hoefler Text in the Library. I tried disabling and then enabling, but that didn't work. Has anyone else encountered this problem? If so, have you discovered a solution? Thank you.

Thanks for the file. It obviously helped, but I am not sure how. I probably should have taken careful notes about what I did by way of disabling and removing the .ttf fonts and then dragging in the .dfont variety. At one stage when I brought up a Hoefler document in Word, the regular Hoefler text had disappeared. I panicked and removed the .dfont version. Later, after trying something else, the text came back but (judging by the numerals) it was not Hoefler. To make a long story short, all styles of Hoefler (including italic and black) are now working. There are no duplicate font files—I used Remove Duplicates—but I have no Hoefler file in either of the two Fonts folders, even though I can see Hoefler Text in Font Book! To be safe, I used Font Book to export the Hoefler Text to a back-up folder, and the version it exported is the .ttf version. In Get Info I confirmed that it’s the 6.1d7e1 variety. I restarted the computer twice, and determined that this situation is stable. Go figure.
In any event, you set me on the right road. Hoefler Text is now working as it should. I appreciate your help.

XML: Custom Color and Bold font for News Title

Hello,
Do anyone know how to fix the following problem?
We changed the color of the title of an newsitem in the RenderList layout by filling the RGB settings. This works fine, however if we want to make the font also bold, the color changing back into the default setting (=blue).
I hope one of you has got a solution.
Kind regards,
Joost

Hi Shankar,
I already tried your suggestion. Unfortunately, it doesn't work.
However, I found the specific problem using a custom color in combination with Style = Link and Font decoration = Bold doesn't work. I found a work around solution, by changing the Style into Header3.
Regards,
Joost

SkyDrive has only 7 GB capacity for Lumia 800

It seems that only 7 GB is available for my account in SkyDrive, can anyone confirm on this. I can see in the SkyDrive application setting and it is showing only 7 GB.

Dear Sriash,
Microsoft offers 7GB of free cloud storage through the SkyDrive service to all Windows Phone users. Originally the skydrive amount space was targeted at 25GB, but recently Microsoft has decided to reduce to 7GB for all it's users who where not using the full space.
This is the statement of Microsoft on the matter published back on April.
"7GB free for all new SkyDrive users. We chose 7GB as it provides enough space for over 99% of people to store their entire Office document library and share photos for several years, along with room for growth. To put things in perspective, 99.94% of SkyDrive customers today use 7GB or less – and 7GB is enough for over 20,000 Office documents or 7,000 photos. Since the current base of customers using SkyDrive tilts towards enthusiasts, we are confident that, as we expand the range of people using SkyDrive, this 7GB free limit will prove to be more than enough for even more people.
We know that many of you signed up for a service that offered 25GB, and some are already using more than 7GB of storage. So, starting today, for a limited time, any registered SkyDrive user *who has uploaded files to SkyDrive* as of April 22nd can opt in to keep 25GB of free storage while still getting all of the benefits of the new service. (For users who are already using more than 4GB as of April 1, we’ve automatically opted you in to 25GB of free storage to avoid any issues.)"
It does seem counter intuitive for Microsoft to lower the amount of free space.
But, it’s still more than a lot of other similar services like Dropbox or SugarSyn where they offer 5GB of free space.
If 7GB still isn’t enough, you can subscribe to more space, up to 100GB in fact. But this will not be for free.
I hope this clarifies your question.
All the best,
John_Tesla

Bold font for some fields

Hi all!!
I have a requirement to somehow intensify some of fields. For example, make them in bold.
I am talking about fields for attributes STRUCT.LASTNAME, STRUCT.FIRSTNAME of HEADER context node of BP_HEAD/AccountDetails view.
Is this possible? Any suggestions?

It's possible to totaly redefine bsp elements using chtmlb form iterator. Some information in this thread: How to display the link dynamically on placing the cursor on a field?

Required fonts for Bridge labels?

The attached screen shot explains it all. I keep my font library pared to a minimum, and I figure there is some font Bridge uses specifically for this area.

In case anyone is interested, here's what I've discovered.
There are four font families installed with Adobe CS2 that don't remain in the Library/Application Support/Adobe/Fonts folder. They are Courier, Myriad, Symbol, and ZWAdobeF. All are PostScript (Type1) fonts—except for ZWAdobeF, which is TrueType.
     Couri
     CouriBol
     CouriBolObl
     Courier
     CouriObl
     MyriaBol
     MyriaBolta
     Myriad
     MyriaIta
     MyriaRom
     Symbo
     Symbol
     ZWAdobeF.TTF
Interestingly, these may be required fonts, but instead of remaining in the Requrd folder, they seem to be installed in the User font library. According to the Extensis publication Font Management in Mac OS X: Best Practices Guide (7th ed.), the font Myriad is required for CS2. Meanwhile, an Adobe forum posting by Dov Isaacs, an Adobe employee, indicates that ZWAdobeF is a special hack for Adobe Acrobat and serves a limited purpose but is best left untouched. The remaining fonts may or may not be crucial.
I'd lost track of the source of these fonts long ago and had no idea that they belonged to my Adobe applications. Although they'd remained in my User font library, several of them (Courier and Symbol) had recently been disabled—but not Myriad or ZWAdobeF. For the time being, I've decided to move them all back into the Requrd folder where they'll be activated for all relevant Adobe applications.
http://blogs.adobe.com/typblography/fonts-installed-by-adobes-creative-suite#CS2
http://www.extensis.com/en/font-management/fmbpg.jsp
http://forums.adobe.com/message/3996613

Bold font is too wide in browsers

I actually have Linux Mint installed, but searching google indicates that the Archlinux forum has far and away the most expertise with the gnome font system, including a very informative wiki page that I have read and tried to apply, unfortunately to no avail.
The reason I'm asking this question is that I feel like I'm so close to having a gorgeous desktop, but what looks like a rendering error looks like it may frustrate me every time I surf the web.
I've used advanced settings (which I installed following a tutorial) to set my system font to Sawasdee, which looks very good. In fact, I would call Sawasdee the best looking screen font, by my personal preference, that I've ever used.My problem is that bold text is too thick, but pretty much only in browsers, chrome and firefox.
The Sawasdee font family has a great bold but for one reason or another that is not what is rendering, instead it looks like the browsers are taking the regular, elegant Sawasdee font and making it two or three times as wide.
Is there a setting just to tell the system how to handle bold text?
Below is a link to an image of the linux mint forum where I think the text that is not bold looks close to perfect, but the text that is bold looks almost unreadable:
http://imgur.com/owffN.png
Below is how the fonts look in the system and how firefox renders them:
http://i.imgur.com/MXbuM.png
It seems to me that the problem is that the applications are making their own bold font instead of using the one available. I wonder if I could rename a file or alter a config line somewhere to correct that.
So far, I've added this to an /etc/fonts/local.conf file that I made using the header from font.conf but it did not help
<match target="font">
<test name="weight" compare="more">
<const>medium</const>
</test>
<edit name="autohint" mode="assign">
<bool>false</bool>
</edit>
</match>
I really appreciate any help I can get. If there is more information that might be helpful, I am eager to provide it.
Last edited by ra1110laptop (2011-12-06 07:32:17)

Sorry but we can give assistance for original Arch Linux only. Please ask on a Linux Mint forum for detailed help.
But there is quite some information about your issue in the Arch forums and the wiki. Some quick search should help.
Closing.

Speedgrade CC only renders one frame for 30 minutes

Graded a simple, straight, 30 minute clip in Speedgrade CC. Render to Prores LT.
It went through the entire render process, but the movie has only a single frame for the entire 30 minutes.
This was nothing but a simple primary gain and contrast grade. Nothing else.

I wouldn't say Sg is a badly compromised program ... if one takes a car and tries to make it do the work of a truck, well ... one will be unhappy with the car, but is it really the fault of the makers of the car?
Speedgrade has it's glitches, and no one on the planet can tell you more about them than the guys that created it or those that are working it behind the scenes. But Speedgrade is designed to be a grading program ... not an NLE or an encoding program. It has those functions simply so that for some who say just want to do quick dailies probably doing quick & dirty grading of un-trimmed "clips" just to get something out for directors to see if what they shot will work. In my experience, for that use you need to know exactly how it needs setting, and have your presets stored.
The whole idea of this software is to be part of a group ... each program specialized into one set of problems, rather than each trying to be an equal Swiss-Army knife. And in use, it works quite well (for most of us most of the time) though there are a few glitches. Such as say, key-framed masks that at times can be problematic. Be that as it is, use the program for what it is designed for. Within that, it can be pretty awesome.

Don't use bold font in file names

I use Bridge in detail view, and the image names are in bold font in that view. When you click on an image name to edit the name, it resizes, which is annoying: every time I click on a name, I click at the point where I want to insert or begin selecting text, and when the font goes from bold to normal, this point moves.

Thank you, Jim, for the fact that Bridge in CS3 did away with the bold font for file names.

Fade button label

Hi, plase help me!
I've applied a fade effect to a component that contains a
button and some other children. All the component fades correctly
and the button fades too, but not its label. I think that it's an
embedded fonts problem. So I've embedded a font:
@font-face {
src:local("Arial");
font-family: ArialEmbedded;
advanced-anti-aliasing: true;
Button
embedFonts: true;
font-family: ArialEmbedded;
font-size: 13;
After this operation the font-size of the button label
matches, but not the font-family! The system default font-family
persists!
How can I embed fonts in button components? If I cannot fix
this issue, I think that I cannot fade the button together with its
label!
Thanks

Fixed, I had to embed the bold version of the font, because
button labels are bold!
So, the finally code is:
@font-face {
src:local("Arial");
font-family: ArialEmbedded;
advanced-anti-aliasing: true;
font-weight:bold;
@font-face {
src:local("Arial");
font-family: ArialEmbedded;
advanced-anti-aliasing: true;
font-weight:normal;
Button
embedFonts: true;
font-family: ArialEmbedded;
font-size: 13;
All buttons will use the bold ArialEmbedded to render their
label!
Byez

The 16G IPOD catalog entry should have in bold THIS THING HAS ONLY ONE CAMERA. I bought one for my dad thinking it was same as the last one i bought. my fault, but also theirs.

I just ordered a new 16G iPod touch for my dad. the bigger models said they had an hd camera, so i assumed this one did not BUT AT LEAST HAD A REAR FACING CAMERA.
So it arrives and he says it only has one camera and I say of course it has two cameras.
it turns out just a front-facing camera (so i guess thats what Facetime camera meant).
so now he wants to return it
be careful ordering. my fault, but also theirs. it's like selling a car without a windshield. their should be a giant sign that says, this thing has only one windshield

Disagree for three reasons:
1) this is a KEY feature that was removed from prior models. removing something that cutomers depend upon requires more than burying in a cryptic spec.
2) even spec does not use clear generic terms like "front-facing camera" "rear-facing camera" or "has one camera" - instead it used Apple-terms like Facetime camera and isite camera, which on a casual glance appears like just upgrade/downgrade camera version. 16g model says facetime camera, and cell next to it it says isite camera (instead of also showing both models have facetime camera on the same row) and that's not a proper comparison grid, comparing apples to apples, so to speak...
3) you presume every person that orders finds this page (which i contend is not clear). i don't want to spend an hour learning what apple-jargon translates to "this model has only one camera"
No reply needed. Just posting for awareness. I am guessing there will be more dissatisfaction and returns for this product, so just giving you feedback.

Why can I no longer specify my preferred font for text which has a link attached to it?

I use TBird to send old school, professional looking business letters with logo image header and footers. Recently, I am unable to apply my preferred font to the website link part of my footer. This seems to have become an issue after one of the more recent upgrades of TBird. Its frustrating as I feel good graphic design requires uniformity in font style/type and size. This seems no longer possible. Now when I attach a hyperlink to my website address it changes my preferred font to something that looks like Arial and locks both font and size. It looks crappy.

''Kits47 [[#answer-701080|said]]''
<blockquote>
The only way I know its 12 pt. is that I copy into Word and check the font size there.
</blockquote>
Huge error number one, and probably cause of your problem in the first place.
<blockquote>
I would really like to see TBird use point size for fonts.
</blockquote>
Thunderbird uses HTML, HTML is expressed in pixels.
<blockquote>
In terms of not having Papyrus on you Linux box, I suppose that's you're choice.
</blockquote>
Licensing actually, not choice. The font is licensed and distributed by Microsoft. See http://www.microsoft.com/typography/fonts/font.aspx?FMID=1113 for a list of products your recipient can install to get the font.
<blockquote>
In my outgoing email subject line I always specify that my reply is best viewed in HTML, full screen.
</blockquote>
HTML is the default for almost all mail so that does appear to be overkill. Full screen. Personally I would be just as likely to not read mail that required full screen. Mail gets about half a screen here.
<blockquote>
Most systems will automatically substitute fonts for ones not on that system, at least in Apple and PC systems. </blockquote>
Papurus actually has a higher chance of being present on a Mac system than a windows one as Apple have distributed it with OSX since 2003.
<blockquote>
Anyway all of that is a little off topic. I wanted help with why TBird intermittently messes with font size and style when I cut and pasting email responses to people.
</blockquote>
As I said at the beginning. Do not use word. Word first converts to RTF then to HTML (All done internally) The resulting HTML is extremely complex and to put it bluntly pastes as a whole page from which Thunderbird must extract only the relevant parts. (inside the body tag) The end result is the program ends up confused about what goes where.
<blockquote>
And, if there is some reason why sometimes, again I stress sometimes, it will not let me use the font of my choice for text that has a hyperlink attached to it.
</blockquote>
If your pasting from Word the most obvious thing will be that the hyperlinked text will have it's own font tags another reason I suggest you use the program your in.
* If you want it on paper use a word processor. It is what they are designed for
* If you want it in email use the email program to actually write your mail.
* If you want to guarantee the look on delivery send PDF attachments.

JWS has only 1 bold font for button label

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for