Kanban

Hello
I am working on KANBAN process and replenishment strategy as Planned order with MRP.
When i trigger the KANBAN card planned order is created.That will be viewed in the MD04
So my problem is i am not able diff between MRP run planned order and KANBAN triggered planned order.
EG: MRP triggered planned order as 1000000/Stck
KANBAN triggered planned order as 500000/Stck.
So is their any to change the suffixes of planned order number(Stck)

Hi
Check in the planned order, there would be a kanban indicator which would be automatically ticked for kanban generated planned order, the same applies for purch req, po ord etc. Reward points if useful

Similar Messages

Transaction BORGR: No tolerance on goods receipt for Kanban calloff

Hello,
we have the following situation:
- MM scheduling agreement with tolerance of 10% for under and overdelivery, production supply "summarized JIT call" is set.
- KANBAN cycle has 1 empty container with a summarized JIT call for replenishment, quantity 10 pieces.
- ASN has been created with BORGR transaction, it contains: 1 line item for the material with delivery quantity 9 pieces, assigned to this line item is the JIT call with notified quantity 9 pieces as well.
My expectation was that the JIT call can be booked with 9 pieces as it is inside the 10% tolerance defined for the scheduling agreement. In addition, I expected the KANBAN container be set to full.
Instead, the following error message is given:
'Post GR' carried out without success
(Message no. BORGR215)
Because of previous error, dispatching is not possible for ID 0180573431
(Message no. /SPE/ID_HANDLING011)
Inbound Delivery 0180573431 00010
(Message no. BORGR210)
Total of the summarized JIT calls does not match the current delivery qty
(Message no. BORGR540)
Changing the delivery quantity and the notified JIT quantity to 10 pieces, the goods receipt is booked correctly.
I only found the following notes that deal with tolerances but they are outdated, as we are using DIMP release 603:
https://service.sap.com/sap/support/notes/393421
https://service.sap.com/sap/support/notes/508215
Has anybody faced a similar problem or can help me with this?
Thanks!

Hello Jiaul,
Sorry I may have mislead you. The actual error message is "Goods Receipt for Production Order XXXX can only be made on 2010.08.25 to 2010.08.27". These two dates are the Start Date and FInish Date for the Production Order in CO03,
The Basic Start Date for the current Production Order is 2010.08.25
The Basic Finish Date for the current Production Order is 2010.08.27
I think what it means is that you can only Post Goods Receipt for the Production Order only after the Basic Start Date of the Production Order. Do you know where I can find the configuration for this message?
Thanks

Delivery schedule in kanban

Hi all.
Can anybody tell me how the delivery schedule is created for scheduling agreement when bean scan empty?
Thanks

Hi PKB,
You need to select the replenishment strategy of External procurement as Working with Scheduling agreements in the control cycle. Prior to this, you need to create a scheduling agreement through tcode ME31L. And the number generated for the scheduling agreement is to be assigned in the control cycle. This is prerequisite. Whenever you empty the kanban bin or if the status change to empty, than a schedule line is created.
Reward if cleared and close the thread.
Keerthi

Scheduling Agreement with Kanban

I was looking in to the forum and as per my understanding FRC and JIT schedule, On the days on which the next FRC date (1st. Monday in the month) or the next JIT date (Monday each week) is reached, scheduling agreements with the above profile settings are selected and SA releases (delivery schedules to be issued to the vendor) created (because the next creation date has been reached).
In my case I like to aggregate the requirment daily and send to the vendor end of everyday .What setting I need to do and what will be the process.I am using this functionality with KANBAN.
thanks in advance

Eduardo,
We already decided to use Kanban with Scheduling agreement. We have some MRO parts which we move from one Main storage location to another storage location in production area and once someone will scan the main storage location and if it hits the reorder point it will generate the external scheduling agreement to the vendor. If we have agreement for different parts with same vendor it will combine all the parts in one scheduling agreement and the other thing business want send these scheduling agreement to vendor on the same day not in 14 days or once in a week.
Please let me know how what I have to do to achieve this functionality and we are using LPA agreement.
Thanks

No TO is created automatically when Kanban is set to empty sometimes

Hi Gurus,
My customer come across a strange problem.
The same material , the same Kanban, sometimes TO can not be created automatically when Kanban is set to empty, but sometimes TO can be created automatically.
I checked the following things:
Configuration :activate 'Automatic TO creation immediately after TR generation' for replenishment strategy '0006 Kanban from WM with transfer requirement'.
Storage type and storage section search strategy are right.
Master data: MRP2 View and WM1 and WM2 view are right.
Supply area and control cycle are right.
Stock: there is enough stock in right storage type and storage section
when the TO is not created automatically , i can use LT04 to create TO , and search stratey works well. and TO can be created successfully.
So only i can come up is because of some one is creating TO , so no TO can be created because of the material is blocked .
Do you know any other reason will cause this problem?
BR,
Dragsky

Who has any idea on this? thank you!

How to increase the quantity in KANBAN bin via BAPI or user exit?

Hi everyone,
Currently my interface is posting MIGO movement type 201 (Goods Issue with ref to Cost Centre).Stock in SLOC will decrese. Then my program will use BAPI (BAPI_KANBANCC_WITHDRAWQUANTITY) to update the qty in the KANBAN to reduce the qty. I'm using 9011 replenishment strategy with Reservation. Once KANBIN bin is EMPTY and the FULL button is clicked, a Reservation will be created for fulfillment.
Now there is a new requirement to cater for 202 movement. Interface will post the 202 movement via the Gooods Movement Create BAPI. Stock in SLOC will increase.
Question :
For the KANBAN portion, which KANBAN BAPI or function can I use to increase the qty in the KANBAN bin to be in line with the 202 movement at the IM level?
Eg if there is a 202 movement of 2 qty in the SLOC, the KANBAN bin will need to be increase by 2 qty as well.
Thanks in advance
LIM
Singapore

Hi gurus,
In this case, can I use the KANBAN correction to increase the KANBAN bin qty?
Thanks
Lim
Singapore

BOM not copied to sch. line in Sub Contract scheduling agreement in Kanban.

Hi,
We are trying to procure material (A) via subcontract scheduling agreement document using Kanban process. This subcontract material has a valid BOM (say it has child materials B & C). We are working with 'Replenishment element for kanban' model (not JIT call).
When Kanban bins status is changed to empty, a schedule line is placed in the subcontract scheduling agreement. But when we try to view the BOM of the schedule line created (Item -> components -> overview), we dont find any child material (B&C) attached to it. Hence when Kanban bin was changed from RED to GREEN, material movement 101 takes place for parent material (A) but 543 (consumption of child materials) is not happening for child materials (B &C).
Mean while, we created some schedule lines manually in aforementioned SC sch.agreement. When we view the BOM of this manually created schedule line, we can see the child materials attached to it. Hence when bin status was changed from RED to GREEN, both 101 & 543 movements were posted.
Can anyone let us know what needs to be done so that when Kanban bin is changed to EMPTY, it places schedule line in SC sch.agreement along with its BOM (Child material) details?
Warm regards,
Saravana.

Dear Ashok,
Issue: how to make BOM field(Component Part) in PO/ SA field non editable in MM customising. After the PO is saved user can not able to edit the component field in PO or Scheduling Agrreement.
BOM field ( component Part ) is directly dependent on quantiyu of material entered. so once you change the PO quantity the component quanity wil change accordingle,
presently you can not achievev thease
but You can set the release strategy like that Po that it is not changable, doing so u r requirement willl achieve
Hope your query is resolved

External Kanban (full to empty) - Scheduling Agreement Schedule Lines

Hello Sir/Madam,
Our control cycle is using external replenishment procedure with "0002" (i.e. working with Scheduling Agreements ).
Indicator u201CSeparate GR posting when changing status to fullu201D is not set.
Symptom:
When the Kanban container is empty, I perform a PKBC to sign the status from "Full to Empty" and I save it. The system generates a delivery schedule and an email is sent to the vendor. This can be proved by MD04.
The problem is that the system generates another delivery schedule after few minutes and also another email is sent to the vendor. So, the delivery schedule and the email are incorrectly done twice.
I am wondering how the system setup is able to generate automatically a new delivery schedule which is not correct.
Please could you suggest me some solution.
Regards
Luca

I think in this case, that if no user exits were activated in your system, you should create an OSS message for SAP.

KANBAN Indicator

Hi,
I am trying to create a control cycle for a KANBAN scheduling agreement in transaction PK01.
I get the error - Scheduling agreement item has no kanban indicator or an incorrect one.
Can anyone tell me where can I set this indicator?
Thank you.
Would be glad to reward helpful answers.

Hi Krishna,
Thank you for your answer.
But aren't JIT and KANBAN different things?
When I opened the long text for the error message I am getting in PK01, it said that you have to set the KANBAN indicator to X for the item in the scheduling agreement.
As per my understanding, JIT is a different concept.

Kanban for SAubcontracting Items

Hi all,
We are using Subcontracting for some of our sub-assemblies,we send the components required for these sub-assemblies to vendor against a PO against the movement 541.and when we receive the sub-assembly from vendor we make GR for sub-assembly(mvmt 101) and components get backflushed from vendor stock(movement 543).Presently all this system is handelled manually.
Now we want to take this process in KANBAN.Can we use Scheduling agreement for subcontracting activity.
Pl. suggest how we can use KANBAN for this activity.
Thanks & Regards
Sandeep

Thanks Tajuddin ,
I have tried creating the scheduling agreement. but the problem with sch. agreement is we can not send the components against it unless we trigger the schedle line(BOM doesn't get exploded when we try to do stock transfer[541 mvmt] w.r.t this sch. agreement)
In our case we are sending the components required for making the subassembly in big lots(e.g. for 15 days requirement) and while getting the subassemlies we want to use SAP KANBAN ,so that schedule lines get triggered whenever we trigger the KANBAN and vendor supplies us the subassemblies as per those sch.lines .
Pl. suggest
regards
Sandeep

Goods Recipt againest KANBAN SumJC

Hello Team ,
Im facing one error while doing the Goods receipt for KANBAN Summarized JIT call.
We received the Summarized JIT call for KANBAN and trying to post the goods receipt using transaction code : PJWE and BORGR_C. The system is giving error that -
" The GR posting for SumJC xxxxxxxxxx must be executed w. ref to a confirmation "
Can anybody guide us how to post the GR for this ?? Is there any process whcich we are missing before processing the Goods Reciept ? Your response and guideline is appriciated ..!
Thanks and Regards
Pavan

Hello AP,
Thanks..!
Anyway , I went through this document earlier which was not solved my problem . The docuement speaks about how to perform the goods receipt but it is not discribing about the confirmation creation for SumJC.
Could you please explain the process how to create the confirmation for the SumJC before processing the GR ??
Thnx & Reg
Pavan
Issue is resolved .... Hence closing the thread .
Pavan
Edited by: pavan kulkarni on Feb 17, 2012 5:35 PM

Is there a procedure to auto populate shipping instructions on Kanban STOs?

Hello,
The scenario is this:
- intra-company STO (does not cross borders, no billing), type UB, created via Kanban when the bin is emptied
- for this organization, type UB STOs also originate from other sources (ie, conversion from Purchase Reqs), not just originating from Kanban; although for a single material within a plant, Kanban is the method and UB STO is the replenishment strategy
- Shipping instructions (on the Delivery Line Item tab) are a required field when UB STO is created directly, but via Kanban background process the STO is saved successfully without shipping instructions (I find this interesting). This is not a text for shipping instructions, it's the element EVERS, field name EVERS in structure MEP01313.
The problem is this:
- the user (in this case the planner) must go in to manually add the shipping instructions on the Delivery Line Item tab prior to SAP allowing delivery document creation & shipment activities. this manual intervention by the user is unacceptable to the business.
The desired solution from the business is this:
- the business has specified a default shipping instruction that they want (it is configured and ready to go)
Steps we've taken to resolve:
-I first thought of using a purchasing info record. But we cannot use a purchasing info record to default the shipping instructions because this STO is using SUPPLYING PLANT and not vendor as the relationship.
-Then, I thought about maintaining shipping instructions on the purchasing view material master record, but the requirement is to only default these shipping instructions when they originate from Kanban and when the STO type = UB. So I thought it was too broad because it could impact other purchasing functions for the same material, plus the info record doesn't work for supplying plant.
-Now I am thinking about a procedure of some sort to configure to find the correct shipping instructions when material master + STO data meet certain characteristics. Is there such a thing?
-Another option would be a user exit available in the STO to do a check for Kanban indicator and STO type and then to choose the desired shipping condition, but this doesn't seem as elegant as other potential options, and seems restrictive (ie, hard-coding the key for the desired shipping instructions or building a ztable with combinations of STO attributes and desired shipping condition, which requires maintenance).
-Finally, it seems odd that the background creation of the STO via Kanban doesn't trigger a hard error when it checks the document for completeness, rather than saving and getting a document # even though the document is missing a required field. This seems to point to STO user exit as a way to fix this problem.
Your thoughts on the assumptions we've made and the potential resolutions are greatly appreciated.
Rebecca
Edited by: Rebecca Slomski on Oct 8, 2008 7:37 PM

Answered my own question. This may help someone, so here is the answer for version 4.6.
The way to automatically default shipping instructions when the STO uses "SUPPLYING PLANT" instead of vendor is to first configure a purchasing value key that contains the shipping instructions. The path is: IMG>Materials Management>Purchasing>Material Master>Define Purchasing Value Keys.
Then, the material master record must be updated on the Purchasing View with the new purchasing value key.
Cautions to this approach:
1. Even though this is on the Purchasing View, purchasing value key is on the MARA table, so it is not a plant-specific material master setting. One purchasing value key per material master record.
2. The purchasing value key contains settings for reminders and over/under-delivery tolerance percentages. This is interconnected with the choice of shipping instructions. Be sure that the purchasing value key is configured to meet the wide variety of planning needs that could exist at multiple locations where the material is used.
3. Some of the above considerations are mediated by the fact that the material master purchasing value key is over-ridden by specific information contained on a purchasing info record or a contract.

GR against Purchase order in KAnban

Hi
I have used replenishment strategy as using purchase orders and after maintaining the required elements i made kanban card empty but when i am doing GR against that PO it is not increasing stock neither turning kanban green / full
Please heelp in this regard
Amit

hi vijay
this is in same regard i mean '+" and '-' sign in kanban
as u said it will work vice versa it means when i scanning my kanban card from supplier to green / FULL then it would automatically do GR for the same amount as mentioned on the kanban card yse it turns green but negative sign remains there
and when i do the actual Gr for the PO of that kanban card it then removes negative sign
I want to avoid this i dont want double process i just want scan to bring material in and that too in desired stock quality stock or some other I mean where i can specify the receiving storage location for external procured part .
please help in this regard
Regards
Amit

External kanban- JIT Idoc set to vendor.

Hello
I am setting the partner profile for the JIT Call in KANBAN for External Procurement.
I have defined as follow:
Partner number 6722334
Partner type: LI
Partner function: OA
Message type: PAB_ORDERS (Quantity release from KANBAN)
Outbound option tab:
Receiver port: SAPDEV
Transfer IDOC immed:
Output mode: 2
Basic type: SEQJIT01 (JIT: IDoc for sequenced/summarized JIT calls)
Message Control Tab:
Application PA :JIT call
Message type: ZDKA-JIT Call EDI
Process code: PJN0 (Generation/export of IDOC orders03 for JIT call)
When I am checking Idoc in ME38 under messages it is showing red
the status process is in error, and the error is below:
No corresponding entry in table JITOIT Message no. JIT00017
I check the table JITOIT and it is empty.
Did I miss some in configuration? Or how that table is to be filled?
Rgs
Edited by: sudhir.R.T T on Nov 25, 2011 12:53 PM

Hi Sagar
For the Confirmation you need to do the customizing for confirmation control, like what would you like to do after the confirmation. Confirmation is an inbound process.
For Invoice you need to complete the customizing under LIV in SPRO- for Invoices received via EDI.
Please go throught the help link for further details.
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_47x200/helpdata/en/a8/b99f58452b11d189430000e829fbbd/frameset.htm
Reward points if useful
Thanks & regards
Kishore

Problem in Collective Printing of Kanban

Hi all
When the user tries to execute the T- code ZPK17 (Collective Print of Kanban) to print the barcode, the barcode gun not recognize it any where ( not only in the SAP).
The user tried to print in other printer and with different sheet of paper it did not work .
Please guide on what coule be the reason and please suggest corrective action. Thanking you.
Kind Regards
Ayaz A Khan

Hello,
You have mentioned about the Z Tcode, i dont think we will be able to help on this.
If this is a standard T.code the forum people will be able to help you .
Reg
dsk

Kanban with Project Stock

PP Experts,
Its my understanding that PP-Kanban is not currently compatible with project stock. To take that a step further some of my colleagues have gone so far as to say that Kanban does not make sense with project stock. I'm not sure that i 100% agree with that. So - my question:
A - is that true? does Kanban not work with Project Stock?
B - would Kanban in a project stock enviroment even make sense?
C - have you ever had experience implementing a 'Kanban-type' solution in a project stock enviroment and if so what were some of the high-level solution details?
Thanks for any and all help.

Dear colleague,
Unfortunately the process of using purchase order or contract with
account assignment category is not supported except the category K or
a different category but with cost center only.
best regards
maria

Kanban

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for