BOM not copied to sch. line in Sub Contract scheduling agreement in Kanban.

Hi,
We are trying to procure material (A) via subcontract scheduling agreement document using Kanban process. This subcontract material has a valid BOM (say it has child materials B & C). We are working with 'Replenishment element for kanban' model (not JIT call).
When Kanban bins status is changed to empty, a schedule line is placed in the subcontract scheduling agreement. But when we try to view the BOM of the schedule line created (Item -> components -> overview), we dont find any child material (B&C) attached to it. Hence when Kanban bin was changed from RED to GREEN, material movement 101 takes place for parent material (A) but 543 (consumption of child materials) is not happening for child materials (B &C).
Mean while, we created some schedule lines manually in aforementioned SC sch.agreement. When we view the BOM of this manually created schedule line, we can see the child materials attached to it. Hence when bin status was changed from RED to GREEN, both 101 & 543 movements were posted.
Can anyone let us know what needs to be done so that when Kanban bin is changed to EMPTY, it places schedule line in SC sch.agreement along with its BOM (Child material) details?
Warm regards,
Saravana.

Dear Ashok,
Issue: how to make BOM field(Component Part) in PO/ SA field non editable in MM customising. After the PO is saved user can not able to edit the component field in PO or Scheduling Agrreement.
BOM field ( component Part ) is directly dependent on quantiyu of material entered. so once you change the PO quantity the component quanity wil change accordingle,
presently you can not achievev thease
but You can set the release strategy like that Po that it is not changable, doing so u r requirement willl achieve
Hope your query is resolved

Similar Messages

Inbound delivery for Sub-Contracting Scheduling Agreement

Hi All,
I am working on inbound delivery creation --> PGR for sub-assembly (Semi-finished product) which we receive from sub-contracting vendor through scheduling agreement. At time of PGR, it should do MVT#101 for sub-assembly and 543-O for raw components.
I already created JIT/FRC releases and did PGI (MVT # 541-O) for raw components. Now I am manually creating inbound delivery (VL31n) to post PGR. When I am doing PGR with VL60, I am getting below error.
Any help or suggestion please ?
As observation, I have seen that in inbound delivery I am only seeing sub-assembly (semi-finished) product. I am not able see "SC Component" tab which I have seen on other environment (ECC 6.0 with EHP4). Is it related to system limitation where we can't do PGR for sub-contracting ?
Thanks.

Hi AKPT,
Sorry if i miss understood but note 352243 says to refer note: 338119
"In the current release, it is not possible to process the components to be cleared when you post the goods receipt for the inbound delivery. (See Notes 338119, 197864 and 199703 also).
However when you implement these corrections, the error log is also displayed for the subitems to be cleared and further processing can be carried as described in Note 338119."
When I refer note : 338119, there is no correction. Am I missing anything ?
Again my issue is I am not able to perform Post Goods Receipt. Even after doing PGR, if system do 543 for raw component, I am fine.
Thanks.
Regards,
Ravi

Line item text field from MIGO are not copied into FI line item text field

Hi all on SCN, please, I need a help.
It was created as required by the user a field status group with the text field required.
This field status group was assigned to some accounts, in order to make my unit tests.
u2003
In development envirionment was made some tests directly in FI area, and it works properly.
u2003
But the user made a test using MIGO transaction, choosing in this transaction an account that he changed its field status variant to the one created in development environment, that make the text fiels required. So, to start, he donu2019t fill the text item of MIGO, and a message error appear stating that he needs to enter values in this field.
After fill in the text fiels, he can save his work.
u2003
But the FI document generated donu2019t receive the line item text typed in MIGO, but receives the values on Reference document and Document Header text entered in the header of MIGO, what is missing, donu2019t is automatically copied MIGO text line items to FI documents line Items, does there is some additional configuration missing?
Hope someone help me with this issues.
Thanks in advanced!

Hi,
Material document will get updated in reference field in FI by default. If for any reason, want to get this updated in text field, you need to define a subsititution in GGB1.
Best Regards,
Madhu

Billing Plan Start Date not copied to Sales order from Service Contract

Hi
We are developing a process of Creation of Service Contract and then a order confirmation.
Now based on the Order Confirmation will bill based on the Bill Plan.
The Bill plan start date in contract header is not flowing to Sales Order header while creating with reference.
Then navigating to Header Billing plan and if we input the date the billing plan dates are displayed.
We checked the copy control settings and seems like the date is not copied.Is this a standard behaviour.
If so then do we have any work arounds to achieve the same. Because the contract start date can change before confirmation.
So business wants a sales order confirmation to be created after contract creation and bill periodically as per the Sales order instead of contract.

Hi,
Appreciate ur quick response. But instead of FKDAT i need the FPLA-BEDAT to be flowed to Billing Plan.Right now iam entering the following date manually at header.Instead if it copies from Contract header then manual entry could be neglected.
Is it possible with the same routine to code with the above mentioned FPLA-BEDAT.

Text is not copying into Header Text Type from Contract to Order & Invoice

Salute Masters!!
I have done related configuration in VOTXN for Sales Document & Billing.
After creation of Contract, given Text in New Header Text Type, itu2019s not copying into Sales Order or Invoice.
Although, which was configured earlier one, for that Header Text Type, text is copying into Order & Invoice both properly.
Firstly; I have given the same Access Sequence for the New Header Text Type, It was copying the same matter which was given into Old Header Text Type, then I have created new Access Sequence & assigned changed Access Sequence for the New Header Text Type, even then it is not copying.
I have checked other Configuration those are OK!
Assignment of Sales Document Type to Text Determination Procedure, it is OK!
Please provide the solution.
Thanks in advance.
Warm Regards,
Sanjai Srivastav

Hi
Hope the issue is resolved , if not please check these settings - VOTXN
1. Create Text Type for your Sales order -S001 and Billing Invoice - B001
2. Create Access Sequence - Z001.
3. Include your Both Text Type in respective Procedures.
Now
WHen you will assign the Text into your Text Procedure - Assign same Access Sequence in both the case.
In your Sales Order text procedure - Assign
1. Assign Text Type S001 and Access Seq Z001
2. Select the Access Seq on the left side in the VOTXN T-Code , a POP up will come and then input Your Access Seq into that
3. You will get another screen, Here give the Seq No-1 and VBBK Header Text and Again Assign TEXT type S001.
Now go to Invoice Text Procedure
1. Assign Text Type B001 and Access Seq Z001 and SAVE.
Once you will do that the step 2 and 3 will automatically get copy in the backend.
To Check
2. Select Access Seq on left side and in the Pop Up input access Seq. Now there you will see the system has copied the
fields from the Order.
Now try running the scenario. same you can do for Contract and Order.
Hopefully this will Help you.
please let me know if any concerns
Thanks
RB

Service Short Text is not copied creating Req w.r.t Contract

Hi,
When I try to create a req service item with reference to a contract, short text (TXZ01) is not copied from contract to req. The field is open for input and I have to input manually, or I'll get error ME083.
Is here a way to copy short text from contract to req automatically?
Thank you!
Regards,
Jully

Hi,
it could be due to an active user exit like EXIT_SAPLMEREQ_005 or EXIT_SAPLMEQR_001.
Please check your exits.
Regards,
Edit

Schedule Lines generated for expired Scheduling agreements

Hi All,
We are facing problems in Scheduling agreements.
Schedule lines are getting generated for those agreements whose validity has expired(i.e Validity in Past).
Is there any check to restrict those Scheduling Agreements??
Please Help.
Regards,
Ritesh.

from OSS note 914607 - FAQ: Validity and status of scheduling agreements
1. Question: When I process scheduling agreements without delivery schedules, I have the option to specify the validity of the scheduling agreement: "Valid" and "Valid to". What role does the validity play when the scheduling agreement is processed?
Response: In the case of scheduling agreements without delivery schedules, the system checks the validity of the scheduling agreement if you create a new schedule line or change an existing schedule line. If the schedule line date is outside the validity interval, a warning message is issued. You can then decide whether or not to create the schedule line or whether to adjust the validity of the scheduling agreement. No error message is issued.
2. Question: What role does the validity play in the case of scheduling agreements with delivery schedules?
Response: The function is similar to scheduling agreements without delivery schedules. The only difference is that the entry of the validity is optional (unlike scheduling agreements without releases) and this is not checked by the system. If the validity is missing, the system does note issue a warning message. If you specify the validity, the system behaves in the same way as for scheduling agreements without releases.

Schedule line combination in a scheduling agreement.

Hi
Is it possible to combine two schedule lines in a scheduling agreement into a single delivery.
If yes, whats the procedure.
Please help.
Regards
Madhu

Hi,
If you have more than one scheduline confirmed and due for delivery, those schedulines can be combined to gether.
Ex: 10 quantity was required to be delivered yesterday and were open and confirmed.
Now today you have 5 quantities open and confirmed.
Then, you when you are creating the delivery today, you will be able to create the delivery for 15 quantity, hence all your previously undelivered confirmed quantities will be combined and delivered.
Prakash

Payment Terms not copying to Items

Hi Guru's
I have a situation where the Payment Terms are not copying to the line items and because of the same it is going to Incompletion log.
Tried different ways.
Maintained in the Cust master Sales data and when we change the same in the Order it is not copying to line items.
Didn't maintain in CustMast- didnt copy to the line items.
how to make it to copy to the line items...
Thanks All.

There are no custom developments done.
Again my issue is we have not maintained any payment terms in the Customer Master.
Process
1) So nothing would be there in the Sale order header
2) They give payment terms manually in the Order Header.
Issue
1) It is not getting copied to the line items.
2) Giving Incompletion log even though it has been entered in the header(reason it is not copying header values to the items), so they have to enter in the line items again, which is painful has they have entered for 100 line items.
Help Needed
How to solve this problem- The ideal solution would be whatever payment term entered, has to get copied to the line items or need to make payment term mandatory in some other way other than Incompletion log.
Any help ?
Thanks

*Is it possible to put service conditions in sub contract PO?*

We are giving an Item X for servicing to a vendor. The vendor can do to 2 services S1 and S2 to the item X and give it back.
For this we made a recursive BOM with item X and created a sub contracting PO.
But the problem is we are already having service master and SERVICE conditions for S1 and S2. The vendor needs to charge on the basis of these service conditions.
Example:
Item is TOOL-X.
Service1 and condition: Polishing. 25 INR / each.
Service2: and condition: Plating. 8 INR/ sq.mm
As we need to keep account of items given to Vendor (sub-contractor), I selected item category L. But here I cannot put service conditions? Is it possible to put service conditions in sub contract PO?
If I go for item category D (service) I will not be able to account for materials given to subcontractor.
Please suggest how to reflect this scenario in PO.
Ganapathi

Hi
It is always advisable not to put servicable materials in subcontracting.The reason being, every service would add value to the same material ( MAP will change) .If the material undergoes service many times then the Inventory value of the material will be Inflated.Hence to avoid this follow the steps
1) Create a service PO against the vendors
2) Issue the material via MB1B 541
3) Recieve the material through MB1B 542
4) Enter service entry sheet via ML81N
5) MIRO for service vendor
Regards
Sandeep

Unable to block line item in a schedule agreemnet using ME32L

Hi Experts,
When I am trying to block/delete one of the line items in a schedule agreement I am not able to do so. I am getting the error message "Document lines of document item (16) are in different fiscal years".
Further the diagnosis message given is "If you are using Funds Management and want to set a carryforward level for the commitments documents, then all line items which belong to a document item (e.g. different schedule lines or account assignments of a purchase requisition belonging to the same purchase requistion item) must be created in the same fiscal year.
Otherwise the criteria for setting this carryforward level are not clear"
The procedure is given as "Check the respective date on which the different line items were updated and adjust it appropriately and instead generate a new document item (e.g. purchase item)"
Can any of you throw some light on this.
Regards
ACR.Ruben

Thanks for the input.
The validity of the Schedule agreement is till 31.03.2010.
Regards
ACR.Ruben

Delivery from sales scheduling agreement with one item per schedule line

Hi all,
I have a sales scheduling agreement where the same part number has 3 different JIT schedule lines and I need to create a delivery with 3 item lines: every item line of the delivery has to be referred to one schedule line of the scheduling agreement.
When I create the delivery with transaction VL10E it has only one item line and its quantity is the sum of the 3 schedule lines of the sales scheduling agreement.
I've tried to change the customizing of the User Role, choosing the Split Schedule Line = 2 ("One item per schedule line") but the delivery is created again with only one item line.
How can I solve this issue?
Thanks in advance for reply

Dear Alex
The SAP standard behaviour is that all schedule items with delivery date in the past have to be rescheduled anyway to one date and are combined therefore.
Partially this behaviour can be influenced in VL10* by 2 parameters in
the user role : Split per sched.line and Rule (delivery qty).
Please find below informations about these different parameters
"Split per sched.line propose you 3 Rule for creating one delivery item
per schedule line. In a delivery list in item view with multiple
schedule lines, you can decide for the same document item whether you
want to generate one delivery item per schedule line or whether you want
to deliver the cumulated quantity of the last schedule lines selected.
About rule for delivery quantity, the following rules are currently
implemented:
1. No cumulation
The open schedule line quantity to be delivered is the quantity at which
the list line is delivered.
2. Sum of all open schedule line quantities to be delivered that fall
before the chronologically latest date in the to field (following the
Deliv. creation date field) of the selection criteria.
3. Sum of all open schedule line quantities to be delivered whose
delivery creation date falls within the selection time frame (between
the dates in the Deliv. creation date and to fields, respectively),
making the calculation of the quantity to be delivered consistent with
selection criteria. However, calculationof the quantities delivered with
the order's schedule line quantities is not affected."
Hope this helps.
Regards
Tonia

Dates and quantities copied from Scheduling Agreement to Delivery Order

Hi everybody,
we're experiencing a problem with copying control for dates/quantities between Scheduling Agreement and Delivery Order.
If we define a Forecast Delivery Schedule with more lines/dates into a Scheduling agreement, when I create a Delivery Order with reference to a specific date the system always copies the first forecast delivery schedule date, disregardful the date specified in the selection criteria for delivery creation and with the fact that this could have already been carried out.
Here's an example:
Forecast Delivery Schedule into Scheduling agreement:
(Date) 12.03.07   (Quantity) 10 TO
(Date) 13.03.07   (Quantity) 12 TO
(Date) 14.03.07   (Quantity) 15 TO
When delivery has to be created with reference to Scheduling Agreement, the system doesn't about the date specified in selection parameters (e.g. 14.03.07) and copies the quantity of the first forecast delivery schedule line (10 TO).
Does anybody knows how to maintain Copying Control for dates and quantities between Scheduling agreement to Delivery Order?
Thank you!
Luca

Dear Pattanaik,
check data transfer from copy controls.for this T-code is VTLA
here select your doc type and select details and check also item.check inside both types data trasfer wich is assigned change from this item to header.your problem may ve coming from here.
hope this will helps you
Prem

How to Change Scheduling Agreement Schedule line data thru BAPI ??

Hii
I want to change the shedule line data for a scheduling agreement .
I used BAPI_PO_CHANGE but as this BAPI is used for PO only this gives a
Error Message for Scheduling agreement .
Please suggest me BAPI or FM to update the Scheduling agreement Schedule line.
Regards
Ajitabh Pradhhan

as BAPI_AGREEMENT_MAINTAIN is not available in 4.6c
Please help me out on hwo to maintain Scheduling Agreements .
Regards
Gaurav

Sub Contracting Purchase Order

Hi All
What is table name and field name to see the alternative BOM status for Sub Contracting Purchase Orders?
Example:
I have a Material :Shaft, which has two alternative BOM's.
When i placed the Sub Contracting order to the Vendor. System will explore the BOM and display the list of components.
How to know that Which alternative BOM system taken to the PO?
Can any body please suggest me the table name and field name?
Thanks
SUNIL

Hi
if you are working with Alternative BOM in sub contracting. the system works as follows
first of all you should mantian the Sub-Con Info record for subcon that in purchasing view you will have the production version, here you have to attach which production version you want to use asd as you know that the production version depends on your BOM and this BOM will inturn get exploded into PO, as you know that info record is the combination of Vendor and Material, only for this combination your alternate BOM will explode
Hope i answered your question
Regards
VIkrama

BOM not copied to sch. line in Sub Contract scheduling agreement in Kanban.

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for