Keyword filtering

Keyword filtering in Adobe Bridge
I'm a graphic designer trying to find a good system for sorting and browsing my stock images. I figured I'd use bridge since I've already got it as a part of CS3.
Applying keywords is no problem, but I run into roadblocks when I try filtering.
Basically, I want subtractive filtering. So if I filter by keyword 'woman', only the pictures with women in them will appear. If I filter further by 'blond', I want it to show me only blond women, not pictures of women and pictures of blond people.
It seems like there is a way to do what I want, but I just haven't found the right button, if you know what I mean.
Thanks.

any ideas on how I can get back to that setting??
If you want to search your database you must use the find command (first time be sure to include the options for subfolders and non-indexed files)
Once your database is indexed fully you can search for woman. This should bring up a content window with all the pictures you have on your database with that keyword.
Now your keyword filter panel is filled with all the keywords that are present in the files from your content window. If you want only the blond woman to show click once on blond and only the blond show.
If you already have selected woman and blond just click again on woman and those files that don't contain blond should not show.
If you want to clear the filter panel selection in one go there is a small red circle with a line on it bottom right of the filter panel, this clears all your filter criteria in one go.
Is this about what you are looking for or did I not understand your question correctly?

Similar Messages

Keyword Filtering please help !!!!!

Hi all,
I am doing my program which is a web browser with filtering funciton, it's running properly now but it have some problem with the keyword filtering function, it still not work properly. I try out a target webpage but that page still displaying...
I suppose to save a webpage into the 'Website.txt' (I use BufferReader and BufferWritter), and compare it with the content of 'Keyword.txt'. IF the keyword are match more than 5 times then the website will be blocked.
I set the keyword in my Keyword.txt with this word "car" and then try to access this webpage:
http://db.gamefaqs.com/console/ps2/...t_auto_sa_h.txt
which content a lot of word "car" ( I checked already). But at the end the page still displaying...
    String B;
    String K = null;
    String W;
    BufferedReader in = new BufferedReader(new FileReader("Banned.txt"));
    BufferedReader in0 = new BufferedReader(new FileReader("Website.txt"));
    BufferedReader in1 = new BufferedReader(new FileReader("Keyword.txt"));
    boolean found = false;
    boolean found1 = false;
///////// Recognize the URL Address //////////////
    while ((B = in.readLine()) != null) {
     if (urlText.equals(B)) {
      found = true;
      break;
    if (found) {
     JOptionPane.showMessageDialog(null,"Website Blocked !");
    else {
     chautaripane.go(url);
//////// Recognize the keyword /////////////////
    BufferedReader inR = new BufferedReader(new InputStreamReader(url.openStream()));
    BufferedWriter buffWrite=null;
    String str;
    buffWrite=new BufferedWriter(new FileWriter("Website.txt"));
    while ((str = inR.readLine()) != null) {
          buffWrite.write(str);
                buffWrite.flush();
                buffWrite.close();
                inR.close();
   int count = 0;
   int lastindex = 0;
////Try to compare and search the keyword
    while ((K = in1.readLine()) != null) {
        while ((W = in0.readLine()) != null) {
        if(W.indexOf(K,lastindex)!=-1)
            count++;
            lastindex=W.indexOf(K,lastindex);
/////////// If the Keyword appear more than 5 times //////////
    if (count>=5) {
     JOptionPane.showMessageDialog(null,"Website Blocked !");
      System.out.println("found"+found1);
    else {
     chautaripane.go(url);
     System.out.println("not found"+found1);
///////////////// Catch exception //////////////////////
   } catch (MalformedURLException urlException) {
    System.out.println("Error in ActionListener for URL... ");
    urlException.printStackTrace();
   catch (FileNotFoundException e) {
   catch (IOException e) {
);The content of my 'Keyword.txt' are
car
gun
I implement this function in my 'dcToolBar' class, I have no idea why it's not working because the code seems very logic already....
Can someone please teach me some solution, I really cry out due to this problem, PLEASE HELP ME !!!

You may want to store that words that you want to block in memory, maybe using a patricia trie or a hashtable. I created a sample blocker application to demostrate a solution to the issue posted. Refer to 'main' on usage.
rashid mayes
www.astrientlabs.com
public class WordChecker
    public static final int MAX_ALLOWED = 5;
    private Map blockedWords = new HashMap();
    public WordChecker()
    public void addBlockedWord(String text)
        HitCounter hitCounter = new HitCounter();
        hitCounter.text = text.toLowerCase();
        blockedWords.put(hitCounter.text,hitCounter);
    public void checkWord(String w) throws TooManyInstancesFoundException
        HitCounter hitCounter = (HitCounter)blockedWords.get(w.toLowerCase());
        if ( hitCounter != null )
            hitCounter.hits++;
            if ( hitCounter.hits > MAX_ALLOWED )
                throw new TooManyInstancesFoundException(hitCounter);
    public void addBlockedWordsFromFile(File f) throws IOException
        BreakIterator bi = BreakIterator.getWordInstance();
        BufferedReader br = new BufferedReader(new InputStreamReader(new FileInputStream(f)));
        String line;
        int start = 0;
        int end = 0;
        while ( (line = br.readLine() ) != null )
            bi.setText(line);
            start = 0;
            end = 0;
            while ( (end = bi.next()) != BreakIterator.DONE )
                addBlockedWord( line.substring(start,end) );
                start = end;
    public void checkFile(File f) throws IOException, TooManyInstancesFoundException
        BreakIterator bi = BreakIterator.getWordInstance();
        BufferedReader br = new BufferedReader(new InputStreamReader(new FileInputStream(f)));
        String line;
        int start = 0;
        int end = 0;
        while ( (line = br.readLine() ) != null )
            bi.setText(line);
            start = 0;
            end = 0;
            while ( (end = bi.next()) != BreakIterator.DONE )
                checkWord( line.substring(start,end) );
                start = end;
    public static void main(String[] args)
        try
            WordChecker blocker = new WordChecker();
            blocker.addBlockedWordsFromFile(new File("g:blocked.txt"));
            blocker.checkFile(new File("g:in2.html"));
        catch (Exception e)
            e.printStackTrace();
        System.exit(0);
class HitCounter
    protected String text;
    protected int hits;
class TooManyInstancesFoundException extends Exception
    public TooManyInstancesFoundException(HitCounter hitCounter)
        super("Too many instances of '" + hitCounter.text + "' have been found.");
}

Keyword filtering Bridge 2.1

I migrated from Elements to Bridge and found a difference in the way Bridge filters keywords compared to Elements. Example: I have 3 images with assigned keywords: image1 (keyword1), image2 (keyword2), image3 (keyword1, keyword2).
If I check keyword1 I get image1 and image3 in Bridge and Elements. However if I also would check keyword2 (in addition to keyword1) Elements would only display image3 whereas Bridge would display image1, image2, image3.
Is there any way in Bridge to mimic Elements behavior?
Thanks

The filter will match across categories (for example jpeg, portrait and 5 stars will return only files that meet all of the criteria), but selecting multiples in a single category will display any file that meets one or more of the selected criteria. (for example several keywords)
This, as stated earlier, is not that convenient if you want to match on keywords.
A point to Tom's statement about having to force Elements to write metadata. I used Elements 5 and to my knowledge never requested a write to metadata, yet the keywords were all present in the metadata when I called these into Bridge. It is possible that there was some preference check box that said to do that, but I never consciously forced that or set that.

Keyword Filtering and Acrobat Connect Meetings

Interesting discovery this morning. We've had ongoing issues
with remote users in other companies connecting to our meetings for
the past several years, even after we'd enabled and verified
communication over port 1935 as well as 443 and 80. Turns out that
when a keyword filter is used and the keyword list includes the
word, "proxy", Meetings fail to launch. Many facilities are
filtering on this keyword to prevent the circumvention of their
communication policies and the access of inappropriate web sites in
the workplace.
Just thought I'd include this as an FYI to the community as I
am unable to find anything in any of the knowledgebases about this
issue.
Cheers!
Troy Wise

I assume you got this pricing from the on-line website? I ask because when you buy it from Adobe enterprise sales and through our corporate channel then this is all different.
Answers:
1. Yes. On-Demand recordings don't apply against your license.
2. No. That 25 limnit is for concurrent live meetings. It's unlimited for on-demand recordings. That 25 limnit is completely set by the kind of license you are buying. if you purchased thru the software channel versus on-line then that number would be 100 not 25. On-Demand recordings have no limit.
3. If you exceed the concurrent license, then the 26th person trying to join will receive a pop-up message saying the room limit has been reached and they will not be able to join. Yes, denied access. No way to charge a fee for overage.

Keyword filtering with 'all' and 'any' not working

Hi folks,
At the moment I'm testdriving Aperture 1.5.3, and it seems that when filtering on multiple keywords the logical connection 'any' or 'all' doesn't work.
For instance, the filtersetting is 'Match all of the following:'
[checked] Yosamite Sam
[checked] Bugs Bunny
[unchecked] Daffy Duck
This would mean I should see all pictures tagged with both the keywords 'Yosamite Sam' AND 'Bugs Bunny'. In stead of that, the result of the filter is all pictures tagged with 'Yosamite Sam' OR 'Bugs Bunny' OR both.
Is this a known issue and is already a fix for this?
Greetz,
Seeta

I had the same problem when I started using Aperture. The 'Match all/any of the following' is referred to the different searching options (by date, by keyword, by rating...)
If you need to search for images with all or any of the keywords ticked use the 'contain one or more of the following' or 'contain all of the following' beside the keyword title on the searching window.

Keyword Filtering & Search Via Parent Structure In Aperture Is Ugly - Help

I'm very frustrated with the keyword assigning and filtering within Aperture.
I basically have my keywording down, but USING the keywords is a nightmare.   I try and create parent keywords by things like People (fred, john, harry, etc.), vacation (2011 - Cancun, etc.), or Wedding (2011 - Fred & Ginger).
What I don't understand is how to easily and quickly search after I've created it.   When I pull up the "filter" it lists ALL keywords, alphabetically, but they are not organized into the nested groups that I created - why?   I can't "search" the keywords either.
The keyword HUD is equally useless to me.   It would be much better if I could easily move photos assigned to one keyword to another - but instead, I find myself needing to search for one keyword, select them all, then assign them to the new one, then delete the old one.   What a PITA.   The keyword HUD would SEEM to be the right place for it as - but all it does is seem to help you sort of organize your keywords. You can MOVE keywords to a parent keyword, but you can't pull up the images associated with that keyword or move them.
I've googled arond on this for a while and never found a good answer.
I used to use a program called Bullstorm Keyword manager with iPhoto that I loved.   Then Apple ruined that, and destroyed iPhoto's way of managing keywords.....   So, I was semi-forced to move over to Aperture which is "ok" - fraught with problems as it doesn't work witih my e-mail programs, slower, etc. etc.   But, I'll take it if it could ONLY handle keyword management better.
Any ideas?

Hello Eric,
Ideally, I want to be able to view my searches at a parent level and then select the children features that are applicable - instead of having to search across all my keywords each time.   E.g. selection Vacation, and then select the vacations that I want to see or see an easy list of all the 'core people" or "all people" that I want to search on.
You can just do that - at least with Aperture 3.2.2, I never tried it with previous versions.
Even, if you do not set the parent "vacation" keyword and do not see it displayed, you can search for it, and if any of the keyword "vacation"'s children are set, then a search for "vacation" will return all images with children of "vacation" set.
If I select "Vacation" under search, it does properly shows ALL my vacation pics.   But how do I easily select three of the keywords under vacation without going through all the keywords to find them?   Same thing with "people"   I'm organizing all my people tagging so I can easily select me, my mother, my wife, etc., but when I go under search, it's an all or nothing situtation.
It sounds like I might be able to do this by renaming "Bob" to "Bob Reynolds" and then putting them under the same parent, right?   That would be helpful.
Exactly, rename the keyword "Bob" outside the group of "Bob Reynolds" to   "Bob Reynolds" and then drag the second "Bob Reynolds" to the other group. You first will get a warning that some images carry the keyword, then you will be prompted if you want to merge the keywords.
Again, thanks for that - that helps.
The problem with the "search" is that I have keywords with people's name in them (as well as within the name of the file).   In other words, I have keywords like "Bob's Wedding" - if I search for Bob, I get that too.   I want to be able to quickly search for people, locations, etc. within that search.
It looks like you are using keywords for task that can be done in Aperture with other tools, like "Faces" or "Places" or "Project Names". To find people I search the "Faces", to find vacation pictures I search the locations, events I search by date. Maybe you can shorten your keyword list by looking at the other options.
Possibly. however, I think the reason I started doing that (back in the days that I was on a PC and use Adobe) was that I like to be able to easily find pictures of Me, with my brother and my mother.   I don't think you can do that with Faces, can you?   I do nee to start playing more with Places.   I like flagging separate events.
I'm sitting here organizing keywords as we've been back and forth on this and the Keyword HUD could be perfect - if would only allow me to create a search - not just mess with the keywords.
Would be nice if there was an easier way to assign keywords with the keyboard.   Being limited to only 8 keywords at a time (via the option xyz key) along with "," and "." is awkward.
I wish Kirby Krieger would drop in - I remember he once wrote a nice post explaining how to use the textfield in the keyboard controls to assign keywords by typing, but I cannot find this post right now.
But the basic idea is, if you show the keyword controls (shift-D), there is a textfield with the message "add keyword" written into it. If you now start typing the name of a keyword, you will get a drop down list with possible completions and you can pick one of the suggestions to quickly assign the keyword to your selected images.
If you can find the post, that would be great - would love to read it. Again, the problem is ease of use.   I hit "shift D", then I need to go to the mouse to click on the "add keyword", then type it and hit return.   If I accidentally assign the wrontg keyword, I need to go back to the mouse, click on "meta data", then highlight and delete the keyword I incorrectly assigned.
Overall, the MAIN reason I use something like Aperture is for photo organization and keywording.   The editing is a nice to have - but I can use Adobe for that if needed.   I'd give up everything it would simply allow me to quickly add my images, assign keywords, and edit.
Thanks again!
HTH
Léonie

Questions re keywords filtering

Is it possible to filter on multiple keywords from the keyword panel. I know that you can click the arrow to the right of the keyword to see all those files but is there a way to select more than one keyword at a time from the list instead of using text filter pane? I find that if you have a lot of keywords, you may not remember all the pertinent ones so it's better to pick them off a list than trying to type them even with auto complete.
Is there any NOT function in keyword search. ex find a photo that has A,B & C but NOT D?
Not a filtering question but how can keywords be embedded in the image file without doing an export? For example if I want to access photos with different catalogue but still have the keywords intact or if my catalogue becomes corrupt and I have to re import the files?
Thanks

Is it possible to filter on multiple keywords from the keyword panel. I know that you can click the arrow to the right of the keyword to see all those files but is there a way to select more than one keyword at a time from the list instead of using text filter pane? I find that if you have a lot of keywords, you may not remember all the pertinent ones so it's better to pick them off a list than trying to type them even with auto complete.
Yes, you do this in the Filter Bar (in Grid Mode, View->Filter Bar, or press backslash), then click on Metadata and you can select, in each column if you desire, a keyword to filter on. For example, in column 1 I select keyword Churches, and in column 2 I select Buffalo. If column 2 doesn't show your keywords, you can select it via the little up down arrows next to the column heading.
Is there any NOT function in keyword search. ex find a photo that has A,B & C but NOT D?
In the Filter Bar, select Text, then use the ! (exclamation point) to indicate NOT. So if I type Churches !Buffalo, I get all of my photos with keyword Churches, that are not in Buffalo.
Not a filtering question but how can keywords be embedded in the image file without doing an export? For example if I want to access photos with different catalogue but still have the keywords intact or if my catalogue becomes corrupt and I have to re import the files?
You don't normally want more than one catalog, and if you do, you almost certainly wouldn't put the same photo in more than one catalog. This defeats the entire purpose of using a database like Lightroom to help you find your photos.
Furthermore, I want you to never ever again think about re-importing photos. That's "never ever", a very strong phrase. If your catalog becomes corrupt, you restore it from a recent backup, not by re-importing photos. Why? Because there is information in your catalog that can never be written to your photos. This means that you need to begin (if you are not doing so already) a process of making regular backups of your catalog file and photos. Backing up the catalog file is done via Edit->Catalog Settings->General->Backup. You use 3rd party tools to create backups of your photos.

Hierachical Keyword Filters

I can create hierachical keywords in Bridge CS3 2.1 just fine but they seem to get all flattened out in the Filter Dialog. The best I have been able to get is write the hierachy to the file which gives me e.g. people/family/dad as a keyword but no hierachy. What's the point of the hierarchy if I can't use it for filtering. Isn't the idea of the hierachy to organize. Got to be missing something here?
Ax

I don't use hierarchical option so just throwing out another thought. Seems like the filter panel is giving you a look at how the keyword was set up, may or may not be best option to sort by. If you have a keyword "Ellen" on pictures of Ellen the hierarchical option would tell you if it was from Smith family or Jones family. For your cataloging needs you need to decide if hierachy is the best option. I prefer a little more complex keyword to avoid the mess of the hierachy name. Such as Ellen S or Ellen J.

Keyword Filters bring 3 different results

Hello,
I have a Problem with filtering Keywords.
I set up a smart collection with one single criteria - search for a single Keyword: Number of pictures= 453
When I use the Metadata Filter for the same Keyword: Number of pictures= 405
When using the right hand Keyword List in the library: Number of pictures= 421
One thing is, that the smart collection filter shows also pictures with the keyword in the file name -> Bug?
thanks for listening.

Depends upon who you ask.
There are are those of us who believe items should propagate through a stack and others who do not. There are also some who think that component images (HDRs, Panos, etc) where multiple images are used to make a final, behave one way and other stacks behave another.

Keyword Filtering by number of allocations (or not).

Another keywording request.
I would like to propose a feature that will allow a user to display all images that have a minimum or maximum number of keywords assigned.
By implication, this means that a user could show only images that have 2 or less keywords, or, more than 5 keywords, or, no keywords at all and so forth.
Thanks in advance
Best Regards
Richard

Hello John,
I new I should have expanded that requirement...
I have recently imported 24000 images or so into LR, very few of them were ever key worded. I have started keywording them in sessions and it is moving along. I would like to be able to show images with the fewest keywords assigned, so i can get them into the broad strokes of sorting. The ability to assign a number, allows me to stipulate the degree to which the images are *not* keyworded.
In my mind this makes sense, I appreciate that I may be less than clear on my requirement. Hope that makes more sense.
Regards
Richard

Light Table & Keyword Filtering - Bug?

Here's my scenario. Project with say 30 images. 10 have the keyword "Monday", 10 the keyword "Tuesday", and the remaining 10, "Wednesday". Select them all, and create a Light Table from selection.
So, I the Light Table 'album' I now filter all those with the keyword "Monday" (using the search - field top RH of the browser strip), all 10 are shown, and select my favourite 5. I drag these 5 to the viewer area (Light Table). I clear the keyword field to none (show all), and all thirty reappear - The 5 I dragged to the viewer now have the red '1' badges on their browser thumbnails and are still on the Light Table.
Next I type "Tuesday" into the search field. All 5 on the light Table disappear, and the browser shows me the 10 with the "Tuesday" keyword. Again, I select my favourite 5 and drag them to the (empty) Light Table. There they are etc.
So the crunch. I now clear the search field again, but where are the 5 I put up there keyworded "Monday"!? The 5 with "Tuesday are now up there, and sure, they're back in the browser, but they've lost their red '1' badges, and have been taken off the Light Table.
This seems crap to me. Perhaps I doing something wrong or is this a bug? I want to be able to put things on the Light Table, and have them stay there despite whatever search I conduct. Surely Aperture should remember which ones I've selected and leave them up there shouldn't it?
Thanks
Kevin

OK, so figured out a convoluted bodge-around:
1. Make an album of all your selects. Select all and make a new Light Table(LT) from all.
2. With LT selected, click the lock icon.
3. With LT still selected, hold down apple key, and select your album of selects (step 1). This opens this album in a separate tab, but because lock icon on LT is selected, the LT viewer area is still visible.
4. in you album of selects, type your chosen keyword search. From the resulting set, select and drag the image(s) to the LT viewer. Do this with as many keyword searches as required. When done you can optionally close the selects album tabbed browser.
5. Use LT as you normally would. You can now toggle on/off images by keyword by typing it in search field.
Any other methods I've tried crashes Aperture.
Comments anyone?

Keyword filtering problem in Smart Collections

All,
I’m trying to do create a Smart Collection based on Keywords, unfortunately I can’t seem to get it to work. The criteria is that the collection must contain the keyword phrase “Publish to Flicker & Facebook” but not “Published Image”.
I’ve tried variations of the following:
Match all of the fallowing rules
Keyword doesn’t contain = Published Image
Keyword contains = Publish to Flickr & Facebook
This should give me all the images that I want to Publish to the services but have not been published as of yet. If I do either of these separately they work but not together as a filter. FYI I’m using the Beta 3 version. - CES

That didn't work... even renamed to nonsence words still dosent work

Feature Request: Fast Multi Keyword Filtering

At the current time, in the grid view, if I want to filter by a KW (Keyword), I can click the right facing arrow at the right end of a keyword in the KW list. When I do this, the filter tool opens ar the top of the mid section, and the clicked on keyword is automatically highlighted in the left filter column which is a KW column. If I then click on the right arrow of a different KW in the KW list in the right panel, the new one replaces the old one in the filter.
This is great but it doesn't go far enough.
After doing the above, If I want to select another KW to be used in addition to the first one (in an AND relation), I'd like to <Ctrl>+<Click> on the right arrow for the second keyword in the right panel KW list to have the 2nd KW ADDED to the filter by placing it in a second KW column in the filter giving me a filter of the first KW AND the second KW. To do this as it is now one must convert an unused filter column to KW (if one not already there), then enlarge the filter window, scroll down to the desired KW (which can be quite time consuming if you have several hundred keywords - even in a hierarchy view), then click the second one, and then shrink the filter window back down to reasonable size.

I have a related FR, so I decided to integrate it with the above, which I also like. The FR is for: Smarter Finds with and/or logic and Smarter Smart collections with And/Or logic. For example, I want to find (or to make a smart collection of) all the photos that are in a folder which meet these criteria:
Their file name contains the word "Cuba" AND they have modifications (in the develop module)
OR
Their file name contains the word "Cuba" AND the file extension is .psd
This is because most photos in this folder are NEF, some of those have been developed in LR, and some have been exported to Photoshop to be worked on. It's frustrating not being able to make this preselection to find ALL the photos I've worked on. Anyone agree we need and/or/not/but logic and to be able to combine criteria in a find request?

Unusably slow initialization, keyword filtering

I primarily use iphoto as my video source, as I shoot a lot of video with my panasonic point and shoot camera (it does hd video, and very good vga).
imovie 11, literally takes 5 minutes to start. I have a macbook pro, 2.8ghz, previous model, with the nice fast graphics card..
this is crazy! I can understand thumbnail generation taking 5 minutes, but this is 5 minutes:
EVERY time I start iMovie,
EVERY time I filter keywords, rendering the people feature utterly useless, as going from a people filter, to the whole library is 5 minutes..
Isn't it about time apple improved the iphoto video integration? How about having ranges of video by date, instead of the entire iphoto library? Many of us have way over 100gb iphoto libraries now, and many of us have a vast amount of video in iphoto.
I truly hope the apple engineers consider this common use case and come up with an update to fix this problem. iMovie is pretty much dead for me now since iLife11 upgrade

Odd my takes about 5 seconds to start but I only have about 50GB worth of photos.
Here is a video: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tLx1WUxDfcQ
Do you have a lot of Movie files in iPhoto? If so I would get them out of there for now. I am not sure why but it slows down iMovie a LOT if you have tons in there. I have not had the issues you speak of at all with keywording. Have you deleted your plist and caches?
I am not super familiar with iPhoto but I have smartlist built in to Aperture that has all the photos separated out by date which iMovie recognizes.
iPhoto came out with an upgrade last night. Have you loaded it?
-- Dan
Keeper of TheUnofficialiMovieFAQ.com

Keyword Filtering combining with AND

How do I filter by keywords using the AND operator. It works using find but isn't there a way to combining keywords with AND using the keyword navigator. Like BIRTHDAY AND JOE would give me only pictures from Joe's Birthday? I got to me missing something here?
Thanks

There are other ways, but honestly they are so convoluted and non-intuitive they are not worth discussing (I'm sure someone here will fill you in if you REALLY want to know.) Currently, FIND is the best method.
Feature Request:
Ahem... let me once again mention that checkboxes next to keywords for doing AND searches would be a welcome addition. I see this is missing in the 2.0 beta as well. I sense some confusion here, so if any of the Adobe developers want a working example of this, I can point you to a little-known application I think most of you have access to... your bosses might even let you install it on your systems as I doubt there would be any licensing issues for you... Photoshop Elements Organizer.
To help, I've included a link for the LR developers to follow, there is a 30-day trial even!
http://www.adobe.com/products/photoshopelwin/

Keyword filtering

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for