KP26 dump due to manual entry on Activity Type Category

Hello,
I keep receiving a dump RAISE_EXCEPTION program_error in the generated programs COCC2001... 03 etc.
When I run transaction KP26 for a Cost Center that has no entries yet (with a custom layout), and when I supply or modify the value in column T (Activity Type Category), and then confirm with Enter, I get this dump.
In line 1271 of subroutine ec504_update_others_for_uattr in program COCC2001:
itdat2_key = object.
      <itdat2_key_werte> = 'PLST'.
      READ TABLE itdat2 WITH KEY itdat2_key BINARY SEARCH.
      IF sy-subrc > 0.
        RAISE program_error.
      ENDIF.
I checked entries of table itdat2 (I cannot find where it is populated though), and I can see 5 entries for the &KENNZAHL field:
PAEQ, PDIS, PTKE, PTOE, PTOF.
Could someone explain, what are those PAEQ..., and am I missing some config in the SPRO, or do I have to regenarate those COCC.. reports somehow?

Hello,
Are you sure about the OSS note number?
I'm in system version 6.0.
I also found out that I have this issue with only one layout, and that maybe I'm missing some entries in table CEFORMF - still I don't know how to maintain that for the moment - maint. view, or SPRO action. Maybe I just need to refresh that layout somehow.
Regards,
Michal

Similar Messages

SD - Manual entries allowed for item category in the Sales Order

Hi experts,
please do you know any OSS note related to SD, in order to increase the number of Manual entries allowed for item category in the Sales Order (table T184)?
Thank you very much
Andrea

Hi,
I searched OSS notes and did not find any OSS Note related to add more than 11 Manual Item categories or append T184 Table.
Has any found solution for this, will this be a CORE MOD.
Pavan Verma

Defining the Fields for Manual Entries in Conditions Type

Dear Team,
I want to define new fields in the Option Manual Entries in Condition Type eg PR00 . Can you tell me the Setting where do we define those settings and where are they control.
Thanks,
Prashant

Hi
The option provided for Manual Conditios are Hard Coded by the SAP, and you can not add any new option. If you want to check, pl. check the value range of Domain KMANU, where it is maintained.
What is your requirement? May be you can fulfill your requirement by some other mean, like USER EXIT.
Regards
AA

Making manual entries - In condition type

Hi All,
Can you please explain in detail about _ , A and C ? This is the value we give in manual entries in Condition type ? Plz give a business scenario.
<<
Indicator which controls the priority within a condition type between a condition entered manually and a condition automatically determined by the system.
Make the following entries according to your requirements:
_: No limitations
A: Freely definable
C: The manual entry has priority. When you enter the condition
manually, the system does not check whether a condition record exists.
>>

Hi,
No limitation means it is free to do all the changes,overwrite etc.
C means even if the condition record is present and you enter the condition manualy,manual entry has priority over the condition record.
Reward points if useful
Regards,
Amrish Purohit

Activity type in time sheet

Hi all,
In PS we donu2019t capture any cost. In such case, While entering timesheet, the system through an error message, to enter sender Activity type and it is not allowing to enter timesheet.
Now, what should be done to skip entering activity type and enter timesheet without entering activity type?
I guess it is controlled through work center, by not maintaining costing tab, but the system does not allow to save the work center without entering the cost center under costing tab.
Please suggest, in entering time sheet without activity type
Thanks,
Chandru

Hi,
Go to --> SPRO --> Cross Application Components --> Time Sheet --> Settings for all User Interfaces --> Time Recording --> Choose Fields -->Data Entry section --> Activity types
Double click and in reference to data entry profiles we can restrict the entry for the activity type whether it is required / Display / Hide / Input.
Check and confirm whether the problem is solved
Regards,
Selva

Activity type issue

Hi Experts
We have maintained new P exchange rates ( USD >> AUD)yesetday with validity form October 2009. During the costing run today we've noticed that the activity types are not consideriing the latest rate for calculation (completed KP26 with period 1 to 12 for 2009).
Please advice me why this is happening? Are we missing anything here.
Thanks in advance.

Hi PK,
The title of your issue is rather confusing with what you did with your system because when you do Costing run or product costing, the system do the calculation of your product/products based on Costing variant assigned to the product in which plant the product is calculated.
You have to be aware of the function of Costing variant. The costing variant contain all the rule and parameter of how the system get the prices of your materials in the BOM and how the price of activity types are calculated in the Routing. For the point of activity type you need to check what strategies are determined in the valuation variant which is assigned in the Costing run. Please check by following menu path at IMG/Spro:
Controlling> Product Cost Controlling>Product Cost Planning> Material Cost Estimate with Quantity Structure>Define Costing Variants.
Once you get costing variant which is used in the Costing run/Product costing, then check the valuation variant assigned. Go to detail of valuation variant. The valuation variant determine of how the system get the prices as mentioned above.
Let's get back to your issue and what you did in the system. Changing the P exhange rate has nothing to do your costing run directly, especially for activity type. The price of activity type is defined by the "planning activity output price (t-code KP26) and based on strategy defined at "Activity types/Processes" tab in the valuation variant. Is it using "Plan price as average of all fiscal year period" or any other strategy priority defined for the activity types. I don't think you do planning the cost of cost center using foreign currency.
The only possibility of how your exchange rate change would affect your cost calculation if your materials are procured in foreign currency and if material valuation strategy in the valuation variant use the first priority "L" Price from purchasing info record". If the price defined in the "Material Val" tab are others than mentioned above, your change in E/R would not affect your costing run/Product costing.
Hope this help your understanding of how costing variant and valuation run better.
Best regards,
Irhasni

Max number of activity type

Hi all,
My client has 300 employers and they manage services. Every employee has his own price and they use timesheet.
Do i have to create 300 activities to correctly track their cost? Or there is a more optimized way to do that?
Thanks

Hi,
No need to maintain 300 activity.
Price is picked up with KP26 setting(combination of cost center and activity type)
Cost center and activity type is maintained in info type PA0315.
so maintain the different price with different cost center for activity type.
Thanks,
Neha Duseja

Activity type planning error

we want to CO planning for cost center/ activity type labor,but in kP06, it asks for cost element. how can we do planning without cost element
also
second error says:Cost center C231000 has none of the activity types used here
Message no. K8102
Activity type LABOR not planned on any of the cost centers used here
Message no. K8103
when I check activity type setting, it is: activity type category:1, price indicator:1
how can I change activity type and cost center to allow kp06 posting

Hello
You have to enter the plan against the cost element in KP06.
Check if the activities are assigned to work centers and work centers are mapped to cost centers. Also in the activity master You allow the cost center category in which the cost center C231000 is created. You may enter * in the field CCtr. category.
Sangram

Automatic Payment terms without referrring Customer Master nor manual entry

Hi,
I have a credit memo with reference to one billing document. It is automatically coming with payment terms which is not maintained in customer master nor manual entry in the document. I had checked all the configuration related settings for the document and payment terms assignment. I had debugged and checked for any user exit or function module.
I have no clue in this regard and can anybody throw some light regarding to fix the problem.
Regards
Sashikanth

Hi,
Check if the billing document has payment terms. If yes, even if customer master doesnt contain payment terms the payment terms will be copied to the credit memo through standard copying control maintained in IMG, when you create a document with reference to some document this copying control gets activated.
Also check user exit RV60AFZZ if there's any code written in it to default payment terms by billing doc type.
Regards,
Amit

Dump while copying the entries in view cluster

Hi Experts,
I am having a scenario where i am getting the dump while copying the entries through the vies cluster.
I have 2 tables CU00 and CU01. CU01 is depended on CU00.
CU00- it is having schema which are defined by the user.(SCHEMA-P,DESC)
CU01- this table is having the different tabs in a tab strip for a each of the user defined schema.(SCHEMA-P,SEQNO-P,TABID)
the data will be as follows
In CU00
          SCHEMA1         first schema
          SCHEMA2         second schema
In CU01
          SCHEMA1         01              TAB1
          SCHEMA1         02              TAB2
          SCHEMA2         01              TAB2
          SCHEMA2         02              TAB3
I maintained above 2 tables in a view cluster by making CU00 is the start point and defined the field dependencies as well.
in the T-code SE54 i tried to copy the existing schema and all its dependencies(means all the dependent entries in the CU01 table also).
when i pressed the SAVE button it is going for the dump by saying due to duplicate entries in the table CU01.
but it should check the consistency and display the error message when i pressed the COPY key.
I am badly struck up here. Please help me on this issue.
thanks in advance.

Hi Gouri,
CU01 and CU00 both are dictionary tables.
What I think is, while copying all the dependencies for a particular schema the system ha to check whether the data can be inserted into the child tables or not. I too dont know whether this can be done or not.
If not, it should display an error message stating that " primary key violation occurs please use different key values..."
thanks for the reply.

Required entry field "Trip Activity Type" is empty

In Travel management , when I create a travel request, Activity Type is a required field, I select a activity type when I try to save the travel request I get this error.
Required entry field "Trip Activity Type" is empty
Message no. PTRA_WEB_INTERFACE078

Hi,
I think you have to maintain activity type for that year. check KP06 and KP26.
Regards

Override the storage section check for manual entries

Hi All,
I am facing a issue on Storage section search.While creating To system is giving correct Storage section according t the settings but if I would like to change the storage section to different storage section system is not giving any error message.It is giving only warning message check your enteries.
So I would like know is there is config settings to avoid another storage section selcetion which are not assignned storage search indicator.
I have checked in help.sap.com .I following information .
To set up the strategy for storage sections, see the section on activating storage section searches under Strategies in the Warehouse Management IMG documentation.
If storage section checking is active for the storage type, then the system searches in the storage type only for those empty storage bins in storage sections that have been allowed for the material being put away. When you are creating a transfer order and manually enter a storage bin, then the system checks whether the bin is in a storage section that is allowed for the material.
*You can also make an entry in customizing that permits you to override the section check for manual entries.*_
Can please advice me inorder activate the config for override the section check for manual entries or any warning message.
Thanks & regards,
Srikanth

HI,
Thanks for your reply.
I want Error message.
Regards,
Srikanth P

How to delete a activity type from KP26 which has executed KSS2 and KSII?

Hi experts,
I maintain three activity type to one cost center by KP26
cost center 1:
   activity type 1
   activity type 2
   activity type 3
last month I run KSS2 to split the price and also run KSII, so these three activity already have actual cost.
This month I find activity type 3 should not be assigned to cost center 1, so I want to delete it from KP26 , but the system didn't let me to delete it , how to resolve this problem??
error message:
Costs already posted under cost element 6100016. No deletion possible   Message no. K8098
Under cost element 6100016 there is a splitting record. No deletion p          Message no. K8082
Plan values exist in other periods. No deletion possible.                                  Message no. K8085
Actual price for P111CN33/PMT001 already entered; Deletion not possib    Message no. K8184
thanks very much
lance

Hi,
Please check the long text of these messages, it explains clearly. There are plan/actual dependent data existing for related cost elements, before deleting the records for cost center/activity type, all the dependent data must be deleted first.
1. Run RKACSHOW to check on those entries!! Please first ensure   COKA entries deleted. You may delete the COKA entries by
   executing the program RKPLNC18.
2. Subsequently, CSSL entries for cost centre and activity type,   use RKPLNC29 and then the actual CSSL entries with RKPLNC13.
3. You may use RKPLNC39 to delete a COKP records once the   no corresponding COKA exists.
4. COSS, COKS, COKP and COKL records could be deleted via KP06.
Please notice, that even if you reverse all postings for the relevant object, the records in the CO tables still exist even
if the balance value is 0.
These records prevent the deletion.
regards
Waman

BADI - ac_document for Non Business Area updation in MIRO - Manual entry

Hi,
We have customised the above badi to Zac_document1 and implemented successfully in our system. It is working correctly and giving proper / expected result except while doing the manual G/L entry in MIRO (In some of the scenarios).
In our Production system, one of the end user has generated a MIRO document in reference to a PO. In actual Invoice there were miscellaneous charges added by the party (Vendor), but not mentioned those in PO. End User has adjusted those charges by debiting the required tax G/L - u201CAP-CG Deduct-VATu201D account (In G/L Tab - in MIRO) and crediting the same amount to Material (In material tab of MIRO) that was used in PO.
While debiting the amount to G/L u2013 u201CAP-CG Deduct-VATu201D account, End User has not put the Business Area (In G/L Tab u2013 MIRO) which in turn result into entry in "Non Business Area" for the "G/L - AP-CG Deduct-VAT" irrespective of BADI was active in the system to update the business Area.
Could anybody suggest me the possibilities of non-picking up the Business Area in the line item of manual entry (In G/L tab of MIRO) entered in MIRO.
FI document is getting generated properly with updation of Business Area in all other scenarios (i.e. MIRO & SD Billing generation).
Points will be assigned to proper answer.
Regards,
Shridhar Sawant

Closing the issue from my side since there was inconsistancy in coding at our end.
Regards,
Shridhar

Restrict Manual Entry of Items while creation of sales order

Hi,
<b>Requirement:</b>
User can create a sales order only for line items of contract if sales order is created with reference to contract. Any manual entry of line item should be restricted.
<b>Analysis:</b>
I have coded to check the line item is created with ref to contract or not.( VGBEL gets populated if it is created with ref to contract.). I checked in userexits (USEREXIT_SAVE_DOCUMENT_PREPARE) and (USEREXIT_FIELD_MODIFICATION).
Do help if anyone have come across such scenario.
Regards
Sailaja.
(Intelligroup)

Hi,
This functionality may be possible with a Configuration setting in SPRO.
plz check with your Functional guys.
regards.

KP26 dump due to manual entry on Activity Type Category

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for