Latency pinging VM to VM.

When pinging VM to VM there is a high latency 100ms/150ms/200ms.
Physical NICS are teamed and vendor is Broadcom with latest driver.
Vm's are 2008R2/2008 with some applications installed.
Integration services are installed on all VM's.
Two hyper V hosts are win 2012 R2 with latest patches.
Servers are HP Proliant Dl380p.
Suggestions and recommendations will be highly appreciated.

Hi Lai,
My setup is Windows Server 2008 R2 Datacenter Edition two servers HP Dl380 P
Storage NetApp FAS 2240
I have installed the OS, Latest patches and all the required services on both servers.
Cluster is created and validated reports are good.
Test VM is created in Cluster and tested live migration / quick migration and moved to other node as well in the cluster.
Now I have mapped a RAW LUN from storage directly to the VM and this LUN is offline and not formatted at HOSTs levels.
I have added this LUN is Cluster Storage as well.
Now when migrating the VM it throws an error like migration attamept failed.
My question do i have to make that LUN CSV inorder to migrate that VM to another Node.
Please help suggestion and recommendation highly appreciated.
Thanks..!!!

Similar Messages

  • Why has my Latency (Ping) increased from 20ms to 3...

    Got BT Infinity installed (FINALLY, after over 12 months of them putting it off every 3 months) but this was due to a problem in our village I believe. Anyway, I am right at the end of my line and 5KM or so from my local exchange, I was only getting 2.3 meg max on ADSL and 0.8 meg upload, on BeThere (02) broadband. My pings averaged 18ms to BBC.co.uk (London/Local Servers). 
    Now, had infinity installed last Tuesday, and expected upload and download speeds according to Infinity of 42.1MB download and 6.5MB upload. Fastest speedtest yet was 48MB on speedtest.net and fastest upload was 6.7MB. 
    Now two questions: 
    1. A few days ago, I was receiving speeds on average of about 42-44MB in speedtests, now as of yesterday morning, this has dropped to around 38Meg. My Upload is about the same at 6.2meg. 
    2. THE MAIN QUESTION - Why has my Latency increased from about 20 (18-23ms on average) to 30? 
    Every speedtest I do now for the last 2 days, is coming back with a ping of 29-33ms which is a sudden increase of 10ms. I'd like to know what may have caused this, as I game and I know a better ping is crucial for gaming. 
    Can anyone shed some light here? 
    Thanks

    Nick134 wrote:
    Well as you can see, I've attached you a screenshot of my tracert command results, what do you think? 
    Well from that tracert you can see the increase isn't all down to interleaving, the first hop after the router is only 15ms, that's the interleaving, it's after this hop that the ping times increase to near 30, so in your case the ping increase is all down to how bt are routing your connection over their network.
    Here's my tracert to the same website, routing is different for me and hence the better pings, also the lower interleaving depth on the second hop is also helping of course

  • Solairs 10 x86 long latency ping

    We have a Solaris 10 x86 installed on 4 e1000g network adaptors server,but when issued ping -s to any address, it allways stopped display and then get back to normal, I found the latency is extreamly high even ping the server's own IP address.
    64 bytes from sip (10.10.22.6): icmp_seq=0. time=0.122 ms
    64 bytes from sip (10.10.22.6): icmp_seq=1. time=4.00e+04 ms
    64 bytes from sip (10.10.22.6): icmp_seq=2. time=3.90e+04 ms
    .......

    FYI, I have resolved this as a DNS problem. A DNS lookup was being initiated even though IP Addr was used.
    Setting /etc/nsswitch.conf
    ipnodes: file
    Seems to have fixed the problem.
    Message was edited by:
    Milto1

  • Latency/ping problems

    Hello!
    This is the first major problem I've had with BT since joining them. The service has been much better than my last provider
    Anyway, around mid-november I started to notice that my download speeds were a little erratic. I would usually download at about 800KB/s during off-peak times. I then started downloading anywhere between 100KB/s - 500KB/s. I waited until the end of the month, incase I had passed my monthly limit. Seems like that's not the problem.
    Also, when I play online games, my ping is anywhere between 120ish - 400+. Before these problems, I was getting a ping of about 60 - 80 on this server. I'm getting severe latency which is causing online gaming to be pretty much impossible.
    I'm on the unlimited package (Option 3, I believe), and I live in the county of Herefordshire, if that's any help.
    Further note: We haven't moved the router. Everything is exactly as it was when there weren't any problems. It was a problem that arose suddenly sometime in mid-november. After reading the forums, I noticed a number of other people were having similar problems.
    Any help would be greatly appreciated, because living in the middle of the countryside with very limited transportation, online gaming is what keeps me sane.
    I'm fairly good with computers, but networking is my one weak spot. So if you have any advice, please make sure it is in idiot guide form
    Thanks for any help!
    EDIT: When I do a speed test, my download speed is fine, which is odd. But when I do a ping test, it shows my ping as 350+

    Hi Nerdy-Thing,
    Welcome to the forum.
    Can you please run a Traceroute to the games server you are trying to contact.  To do this click Start >>> run >>> type "cmd".  Then from the prompt type "tracert [destination]".
    Perhaps you can run two traces, one to the game server and the second to another website, lets say bbc.co.uk or BT.com.
    Please post these results and we can have a look to see where your speed is slowing down.
    Cheers
    Sean
    BTCare Community Manager
    If we have asked you to email us with your details, please make sure you are logged in to the forum, otherwise you will not be able to see our ‘Contact Us’ link within our profiles.
    We are sorry that we are unable to deal with service/account queries via the private message(PM) function so please don't PM your account info, we need to deal with this via our email account :-)

  • Latency (ping) in games in Windows vs OS X

    I have just successfully installed Windows XP on a Boot Camp partition, installed Apple's drivers, and updated Windows with SP3 and all security updates, etc.
    My main purpose for installing Windows was to see if I could get better frame rates in World of Warcraft under Windows than in OS X. Comments on Blizzard's own support forums, from other users, indicates that frame rates are usually a bit better under Windows on the same hardware than under OS X, due, supposedly, to better driver optimization. I have yet to see if Windows does indeed allow better frame rates, as the problem really only occurs in specific situations that I have not yet encountered since installing Windows, and WoW on it.
    However, I have noticed a difference of another sort while playing WoW under Windows, and it is not a favorable one. The game provides a latency, or ping, meter. Under OS X, it was usually around 140-150 ms. Under Windows, it has been steadily nearly 300 ms.
    I know Windows is not as efficient at networking as OS X, and recall reading in years past, before I switched to Macintosh, that there were various settings one could adjust in the registry that would improve networking performance in Windows. I'm hoping some of you can tell me more about that, or at the very least, link me to some good information elsewhere.

    Are you playing via wireless? WZC (Windows Zero Configuration) utility scans all available networks every few minutes causing lag spikes. Generally, depending upon the driver, it can vary from a a 75-100ms to (on some badly written drivers/cards) the 900-1000ms. Range. Below is a typical result of a Boot Camp MacBook Pro:
    C:\>ping -t 192.168.1.1
    Pinging 192.168.1.1 with 32 bytes of data:
    Reply from 192.168.1.1: bytes=32 time=1ms TTL=64
    Reply from 192.168.1.1: bytes=32 time=3ms TTL=64
    Reply from 192.168.1.1: bytes=32 time=1ms TTL=64
    Reply from 192.168.1.1: bytes=32 time=1ms TTL=64
    Reply from 192.168.1.1: bytes=32 time=1ms TTL=64
    Reply from 192.168.1.1: bytes=32 time=1ms TTL=64
    Reply from 192.168.1.1: bytes=32 time=1ms TTL=64
    Reply from 192.168.1.1: bytes=32 time=1ms TTL=64
    Reply from 192.168.1.1: bytes=32 time=1ms TTL=64
    Reply from 192.168.1.1: bytes=32 time=1ms TTL=64
    Reply from 192.168.1.1: bytes=32 time=1ms TTL=64
    Reply from 192.168.1.1: bytes=32 time=1ms TTL=64
    Reply from 192.168.1.1: bytes=32 time=1ms TTL=64
    Reply from 192.168.1.1: bytes=32 time=1ms TTL=64
    Reply from 192.168.1.1: bytes=32 time=2ms TTL=64
    Reply from 192.168.1.1: bytes=32 time=92ms TTL=64
    Reply from 192.168.1.1: bytes=32 time=74ms TTL=64
    Reply from 192.168.1.1: bytes=32 time=1ms TTL=64
    Reply from 192.168.1.1: bytes=32 time=1ms TTL=64
    Reply from 192.168.1.1: bytes=32 time=1ms TTL=64
    Reply from 192.168.1.1: bytes=32 time=1ms TTL=64
    Reply from 192.168.1.1: bytes=32 time=1ms TTL=64
    Reply from 192.168.1.1: bytes=32 time=1ms TTL=64
    Reply from 192.168.1.1: bytes=32 time=1ms TTL=64
    Reply from 192.168.1.1: bytes=32 time=1ms TTL=64
    Reply from 192.168.1.1: bytes=32 time=1ms TTL=64
    Reply from 192.168.1.1: bytes=32 time=1ms TTL=64
    Reply from 192.168.1.1: bytes=32 time=1ms TTL=64
    Reply from 192.168.1.1: bytes=32 time=1ms TTL=64
    Reply from 192.168.1.1: bytes=32 time=1ms TTL=64
    Reply from 192.168.1.1: bytes=32 time=1ms TTL=64
    Reply from 192.168.1.1: bytes=32 time=1ms TTL=64
    Reply from 192.168.1.1: bytes=32 time=1ms TTL=64
    Reply from 192.168.1.1: bytes=32 time=1ms TTL=64
    Reply from 192.168.1.1: bytes=32 time=1ms TTL=64
    There are only a few solutions:
    1) Use an ethernet connection
    2) Connect to a wireless network, and then manually disable WZC service
    3) Under Vista, you can use "Vista Anti-Lag" or "WLAN Optimizer" utility. Unfortunately these tools do not exist for Windows XP.

  • Time Capsule high latency (ping) when using WDS

    Hi!
    I have this WDS configuration.
    An Airport Extreme 802.11g connected to my cable modem as WDS main
    A Time Capsule as WDS remote.
    Both are using channel 1 with WPA/WPA2 Personal.
    I can access the Internet. Printers and AirTunes work fine. But I have some high latency when pinging the ISP modem on 10.0.0.1 from any device connected through the Time Capsule.
    More specifically when I am connected to Airport Extreme 802.11g the ping looks fine: within 1-10 ms. Both if I am directly connected to the Extreme with a cable or wireless.
    BUT when I am on Time capsule (both wired or wireless) my latency time looks very awkward ranging from 1 to 1500 ms.
    64 bytes from 10.0.0.1: icmp_seq=0 ttl=64 time=35.074 ms
    64 bytes from 10.0.0.1: icmp_seq=2 ttl=64 time=291.896 ms
    64 bytes from 10.0.0.1: icmp_seq=1 ttl=64 time=1292.345 ms
    64 bytes from 10.0.0.1: icmp_seq=3 ttl=64 time=1.495 ms
    64 bytes from 10.0.0.1: icmp_seq=4 ttl=64 time=1.435 ms
    64 bytes from 10.0.0.1: icmp_seq=5 ttl=64 time=1.461 ms
    64 bytes from 10.0.0.1: icmp_seq=6 ttl=64 time=1.471 ms
    64 bytes from 10.0.0.1: icmp_seq=7 ttl=64 time=1960.883 ms
    64 bytes from 10.0.0.1: icmp_seq=8 ttl=64 time=960.775 ms
    64 bytes from 10.0.0.1: icmp_seq=9 ttl=64 time=186.944 ms
    64 bytes from 10.0.0.1: icmp_seq=10 ttl=64 time=1.460 ms
    64 bytes from 10.0.0.1: icmp_seq=11 ttl=64 time=977.690 ms
    64 bytes from 10.0.0.1: icmp_seq=14 ttl=64 time=1.529 ms
    64 bytes from 10.0.0.1: icmp_seq=13 ttl=64 time=1002.142 ms
    64 bytes from 10.0.0.1: icmp_seq=12 ttl=64 time=2002.976 ms
    64 bytes from 10.0.0.1: icmp_seq=16 ttl=64 time=1.806 ms
    64 bytes from 10.0.0.1: icmp_seq=15 ttl=64 time=1002.782 ms
    64 bytes from 10.0.0.1: icmp_seq=17 ttl=64 time=1.533 ms
    64 bytes from 10.0.0.1: icmp_seq=19 ttl=64 time=1.565 ms
    64 bytes from 10.0.0.1: icmp_seq=18 ttl=64 time=1002.137 ms
    64 bytes from 10.0.0.1: icmp_seq=20 ttl=64 time=1.446 ms
    64 bytes from 10.0.0.1: icmp_seq=21 ttl=64 time=22.602 ms
    All packets get there but they are terribly delayed causing bad communication while using Skype or SIP telephone from my laptop and imac when connected through the Time Machine.
    I have tried to change the multicast rate on both of them but with no success... still bad latency
    Do you have any suggestion?

    I have found the solution.
    I post it here so it might help someone.
    The issue is: even if you are in WDS don't use the WAN port in the Time Capsule.
    Leave that one empty and use the other 3 LAN ports... and it will make your Time Capsule work perfectly!
    The weird ping result in my previous msg were produced by a computer connected into the WAN port on my TM set into WDS. The port works and behave as a LAN port actually but it's not working properly. Avoid using it!

  • Latency/Ping constant spikes

    Used to be an O2 internet customer but since they were switching to Sky I decided to move. Obviously decided to move to BT as they O2 were owned by BT apparently so I thought I'd get similiar service well I was wrong...
    My latency and pings are fine whenever no-one is sharing the connection, however when someone simply loads up a webpage such as google my ping will spike to 100 - 200 ms, then if anyone is on youtube/skype my ping will go around 800 - 1000ms which is stupid... Therefore even if someone is simply browsing google I can't play games as the spikes are constant.
    When I was on O2 you could have 3 people browsing the internet and my gaming and my ping would be fine, but if one person downloads then I would get a constant 100ms which is fine, but 1000ms is taking the p***. I've rang BT "help" and got this guy that said there was a fault on the line and would be fixed in 3 days about a month ago but nothing has obviously been done (convinced he just wanting me off the phone as he had no idea what he was doing)
    I did a network test and apparently my Network Buffer is high (1000ms) which means if multiple people are sharing the internet then it will struggle, I don't have infinity as I wanted to turn interleaving off for my ping to be low, however I may aswell have done.
    Anyone know what to do? Cheers.

    Sorry I cannot view your picture as its blocked by OpenDNS under that category of file sharing.
    Can you upload it to your own user gallery on your forum profile?
    Other people will probably be able to view it.
    What about your ADSL Statistics can you show those here please?
    There are some useful help pages here, for BT Broadband customers only, on my personal website.
    BT Broadband customers - help with broadband, WiFi, networking, e-mail and phones.

  • High latency ping to local router on wifi

    I'm running 10.10.3 on a MacBook Air mid 2012 and have started to experience very high latency when using WiFi. I've gone through some of the internets and deleted a few files out of /Library/Preferences/SystemConfiguration/ but that didn't do anything. A few other searches yield similar stories but nothing suggested fixed it. For the life of me I can't figure this one out.
    Doesn't matter what WiFi network I am using
    Hardwired works great
    Here's a sample of what I am seeing. Packet loss being 0% is only on the LAN.. as soon as I ping something on the WAN I'm getting a few percentage dropped packets.
    $ sudo ping -i .1 192.168.1.1
    PING 192.168.1.1 (192.168.1.1): 56 data bytes
    --- 192.168.1.1 ping statistics ---
    76 packets transmitted, 76 packets received, 0.0% packet loss
    round-trip min/avg/max/stddev = 1.372/244.464/1391.556/372.973 ms

    Disclaimer
    The  Author of this posting offers the information contained within this  posting without consideration and with the reader's understanding that  there's no implied or expressed suitability or fitness for any purpose.  Information provided is for informational purposes only and should not  be construed as rendering professional advice of any kind. Usage of this  posting's information is solely at reader's own risk.
    Liability Disclaimer
    In  no event shall Author be liable for any damages whatsoever (including,  without limitation, damages for loss of use, data or profit) arising out  of the use or inability to use the posting's information even if Author  has been advised of the possibility of such damage.
    Posting
    There are multiple possible reasons.  Hosts aren't required to treat pings with utmost priority, so some of the variability could be just how busy the host is or there could also be congestion along the path, to name two possible issues.
    Again, "basic" ping is really more to determine a host is "alive", not for highly accurate latency measurements.  However, if you enable IP timestamp, you might get more accurate RTT latency (you may need to calculate the deltas, yourself).

  • What are the network requirements with respect to latency in Forms?

    Our company is a global provider of online sourcing, procurement and collaboration solutions and services to Engineering, Procurement and Construction (EPC) projects and companies.
    We operate three Internet trading portals with 1000+ buyers & supplier companies around the world.
    The application is:
    - based on Forms 9.0.2
    - use SUN J2SE 1.4.2_0X on the client side
    - runs on the public Internet using SSL
    - hosted in Norway
    Some companies reports about bad response times and the users claims that our application runs slow. The application do not run slowly, it is very responsive - however it requires a good network connection. Upon request from our customer base I need to know what is the requirements for the network in order to achive an acceptable user experience?:
    - Maximum lantency
    - Minimum bandwith
    What where the design requirements Oracle set forth when developing Forms?
    There can be a lot of "latency" generating network equipment in the path between the user and our server farm: switches, routers, proxy servers, chaching servers, firewalls, packet shapers, QoS, etc. One customer have all of these goodies and our users in that company do not have fun with the Forms application! However, they do not belive that there is something wrong with the network because normal HTML based sites works OK!
    In order to help these customers I need (URGENTLY) to know what the network requirments are?

    Its difficult to answer since the limits on latency will be governed by the user expectiation....
    For example, a financail trading application which has fast data entry may see a latency of .7 second as not acceptable but this would be fine for an HR application.
    The thing is that a user action, such as navigation between fields, wil generate a round trip to the application server to check for triggers (regardless if there is a trigger to file or not). Its this behaviour that gives Forms is very rich productive interface.
    To compare with HTML is not reasonable since HTML can't do all these things like instant validation, masterdetail coordication, scrolling etc that Forms can do...
    Its like complaining that your Sports car uses more petrol that your 50cc moped!!! ;o) It uses more petrol because its doing so much more.... Ok, I digress but you get the idea.
    Forms will require a certain level of network performance. the figures for that performance will depend on user expectation/scenarios, the type of application and the way it is written (a badly written Forms application can still run slow even on a fast network).
    Using network tools you can work out the latency (ping) from client to server. If this result comes out a figure which is not acceptable then no amount of tweeking of Forms will get it to run faster...You either need to upgrade the network to improve this; or change the style of application (e.g. to and HTML application) which will only ping the server on a POST/GET request but you lose a huge amount of functionality...and you need to ask your end users if they can live with that.
    Hope that helps.
    Grant Ronald
    Forms Product Management

  • High latency/pi​ng times

    Greetings
    I have had DSL for a while and have had no real issues until recently
    My problem is that I am receiving high latency/ping times while using VPN and while playing internet games (doing each exclusive of one another of course). I am continually being dropped or if I stay connected the LAG is so bad that it makes using the VPON or playing games impossibly frustrating. All of this started about 5 days ago or so, so I am wondering what the problem could be.
    My modem is new; I just got DSL in December. I have tried bypassing my router and still get the same result. I have also used computers running XP sp3, Vista Sp2 and Win 7 64 bit, all with the same result.
    Any ideas? Also can inclement weather in Northern VA be causing issues with the verizon's overall network performance? all of that snow cant be good thing for DSL.
    I am in SW VA and we have had alot of snow as well.
    Anyways, if anyone has any ideas, please let me know.. because VPN is how I work some days and this latency issue is causing me to re think my switch to DSL

    #1 What is the brand and model of your modem?
    #2 What is the brand and model of your router?
    If you are the original poster (OP) and your issue is solved, please remember to click the "Solution?" button so that others can more easily find it. If anyone has been helpful to you, please show your appreciation by clicking the "Kudos" button.

  • Latency in dataguard !!!

    Hi ,
    How can I get the time it takes (latency) for the primary instance to get an archive log over to the physical standby instance and get it "archived" and "applied".
    Any ideas on how I can get the latency info I'm looking for?
    is latency value should be defined for dataguard?
    Thanks
    JP

    You can use ping to check latency.
    Below is an example i found from IBM.
    During the process, ping can monitor the time it takes to send and receive the response, which can be an effective method of measuring the response time of the echo process. In the simplest form, you can send an echo request to a host and find out the response time
    Listing 1. Using ping to determine latency
    $ ping example
    PING example.example.pri (192.168.0.2): 56 data bytes
    64 bytes from 192.168.0.2: icmp_seq=0 ttl=64 time=0.169 ms
    64 bytes from 192.168.0.2: icmp_seq=1 ttl=64 time=0.167 ms
    ^C
    --- example.example.pri ping statistics ---
    2 packets transmitted, 2 packets received, 0% packet loss
    round-trip min/avg/max/stddev = 0.167/0.168/0.169/0.001 ms
    On Solaris and AIX®, you need to use the -s option to send more than one echo packet and get the timing information. For getting baseline figures, you can use the -c option (on Linux®) to specify the count. On Solaris/AIX, you must specify the packet size (the default is 56 bytes), and the number of packets to send so that you do not have to manually terminate the process. You can then use this to extract the timing information automatically (see Listing 2).
    Listing 2. Specifying the packet size when using ping on Solaris/AIX
    $ ping -s example 56 10
    PING example: 56 data bytes
    64 bytes from example.example.pri (192.168.0.2): icmp_seq=0. time=0.143 ms
    64 bytes from example.example.pri (192.168.0.2): icmp_seq=1. time=0.163 ms
    64 bytes from example.example.pri (192.168.0.2): icmp_seq=2. time=0.146 ms
    64 bytes from example.example.pri (192.168.0.2): icmp_seq=3. time=0.134 ms
    64 bytes from example.example.pri (192.168.0.2): icmp_seq=4. time=0.151 ms
    64 bytes from example.example.pri (192.168.0.2): icmp_seq=5. time=0.107 ms
    64 bytes from example.example.pri (192.168.0.2): icmp_seq=6. time=0.142 ms
    64 bytes from example.example.pri (192.168.0.2): icmp_seq=7. time=0.136 ms
    64 bytes from example.example.pri (192.168.0.2): icmp_seq=8. time=0.143 ms
    64 bytes from example.example.pri (192.168.0.2): icmp_seq=9. time=0.103 ms
    ----example PING Statistics----
    10 packets transmitted, 10 packets received, 0% packet loss
    round-trip (ms) min/avg/max/stddev = 0.103/0.137/0.163/0.019

  • Having really high pings, packet loss and been on ...

    Hi. I've been on to BT 4-5 times in the last few weeks. Everytime its the same thing I do all their checks and run the speed test. Its the same thing over and over. When i try to explain to them the problems i,m having they said your speed is within the acceptable range. I,m at a loss with dealing with BT. The customer server is terrible.
    Basically the problems i,m having is really high pings. Even doing the BTwholesale speedtest my pings was usally in the 30ms range now they are 70 on average now. I play alot of online games. And Everything is unplayable. I know there is definitely something wrong. Either with the routing or some of the nodes on bt.
    Today I was trying to play Diablo 3, the lag spikes was huge every 2-3 seconds jumping to 1-2k ms latency. I ran some winMTR tests and i,m having alot of packet loss. I tried to explain that to BT on the phone. But its like the dont have a clue what i,m talking about or wont attempt to help me with the issue. All game companies usally tell me ISPs are always willing to help with these problems. But BT seem to refuse to help with latency ping issues, just your speed is fine etc .
    I,ve also noticed people in the BT forums saying something about G.INP and people needing HH5 Type B. Can someone explain to me what this is or if its something happening to my cabinate. I,m using the BT HH5 type A. From what i see the about the G.INP sounds like the issues i,m currently facing.
    Can some Mod please help me. I,m really losing hope with BT.

    Hi Guys.
    Still facing these issues. Is BT not going to do anything about it? Here is a WinMTR test to a game server i,m playing.
    |------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
    | WinMTR statistics |
    | Host - % | Sent | Recv | Best | Avrg | Wrst | Last |
    |------------------------------------------------|------|------|------|------|------|------|
    | BTHUB5 - 0 | 1132 | 1132 | 0 | 0 | 10 | 0 |
    | No response from host - 100 | 227 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
    | No response from host - 100 | 227 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
    | 217.41.216.109 - 7 | 901 | 843 | 18 | 30 | 394 | 20 |
    | 213.120.158.234 - 7 | 909 | 853 | 21 | 25 | 51 | 23 |
    | 31.55.165.151 - 7 | 905 | 848 | 20 | 25 | 51 | 23 |
    | 31.55.165.109 - 7 | 905 | 848 | 21 | 25 | 49 | 23 |
    | 109.159.250.180 - 7 | 897 | 838 | 20 | 25 | 63 | 23 |
    | core1-te0-13-0-16.ilford.ukcore.bt.net - 7 | 913 | 858 | 27 | 34 | 57 | 33 |
    | peer6-0-9-0-22.telehouse.ukcore.bt.net - 6 | 917 | 863 | 27 | 32 | 56 | 32 |
    | 166-49-211-240.eu.bt.net - 7 | 913 | 858 | 28 | 32 | 59 | 28 |
    | 213.248.82.249 - 7 | 909 | 853 | 0 | 33 | 93 | 29 |
    | ldn-bb2-link.telia.net - 7 | 909 | 853 | 28 | 36 | 127 | 70 |
    | adm-bb4-link.telia.net - 7 | 909 | 853 | 32 | 37 | 76 | 34 |
    | adm-b4-link.telia.net - 6 | 917 | 863 | 34 | 38 | 65 | 35 |
    | No response from host - 100 | 227 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
    | No response from host - 100 | 227 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
    | No response from host - 100 | 227 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
    | No response from host - 100 | 227 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
    | No response from host - 100 | 227 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
    | No response from host - 100 | 227 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
    | No response from host - 100 | 227 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
    | No response from host - 100 | 227 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
    | No response from host - 100 | 227 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
    | No response from host - 100 | 227 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
    | No response from host - 100 | 227 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
    | No response from host - 100 | 227 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
    | No response from host - 100 | 227 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
    | No response from host - 100 | 227 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
    | No response from host - 100 | 227 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
    |________________________________________________|______|______|______|______|______|______|
    217.41.216.109 seems to be an issue with this. Getting packet loss of 7% and the the ping shoots up to almost 400 while the average is around 30.
    I,ve tried everything BT have told me, i've phoned loads and loads of times to seek help. I dont know what else to do. Pings and latency is horrible. And i dont just mean little lag. Every online game is unplayable. Webpage loading slowing or broken images .

  • Ping on copper v ping on fibre

    We joined Inifinity 2 on the 15th January just gone. Our ping was a fantastic rock solid 15ms and remained so til the second week of March. Since then it has varied between 25ms (minimum) and 49ms (maximum).
    Now that doesn't sound alot but that represents a minimum increase of 60%. Bt phoned us to sign us up to Infinity 2 and the guy on the phone assured us our ping would be lower that our exsisting copper Adsl  connection. Our previous BT Adsl copper connection pinged at 22ms. So we now have a fibre connection with a higher latency than the previous copper one!
    In various phone calls and emails with the Tier 1 people I've been referred to the some poor bloke who fixes computers on contract! We've had our session restarted. i've been assured that they, the Tier 1 people, were going to try a "something" (but never had an explation or even name given to what this "something" was)... which did absolutely nothing of course.
    Do Bt realise there are 3 (three) measures of speed that may concern their cutomers... and because my thing is online fps ..I only care about latency/ping. And for the sceptical, yes there is a difference between 15 ...22...25...49ms when gaming!
    If DLM was applied in March then surely it should have brought the latency down by now ...some seven weeks later. And if it hasn't then whatever is causing this ongoing line instabilty needs to be investigated ...because it wasn't there for the first six weeks!
    I've asked the Tier 1 ppl to refer this to Tier 2 five or six times as I understand a profile reset might resolve this issue. So far they obfuscated to the point where we are now the point of the phone call to me to 'talk through my problem' has been promised but which I have not received.
    Any suggestions... I was promised lower latency on fibre broadband but it's now higher than the previous copper broadband. Is this right? 

    enter your phone number and post results  remember to delete your number https://www.btwholesale.com/includes/adsl/main.html
    which hub do you have HH5 a or b
    If you like a post, or want to say thanks for a helpful answer, please click on the Ratings star on the left-hand side of the post.
    If someone answers your question correctly please let other members know by clicking on ’Mark as Accepted Solution’.

  • Cable super high latency

    Hello, I have a Cable connection without speed boost and using the CG3100D-2. Some days/times, the latency (ping) of everything I test jumps up to 500+ms. This is a massive issue in online gaming, but it also makes web browsing very unresponsive. The speed seems slightly affected (~35Mbps to ~30Mbps), as tested on "Oz Broadband Speed Test". However, last night was a disaster. Many webpages didn't even load, and a speed test was around 14Mbps. That speed seems perfectly good for general browsing, but the results were not indicative of that speed. I'd imagine I could not play any games either, as the ping results were 800+. At the moment, I don't have this problem. But it comes and goes quite strangely. I used to think it was in the evenings, but it happened at 11pm last night and was happening at 11am earlier that morning. Any thoughts?

    Hi cableuser2015, 
    We recently had an issue with international data transmission due to one of the undersea connection being damaged.  Data had to be routed via an alternative route which could have been the cause of this.
    - Ben  

  • WRT320N LAN Latency?

    Hi. I just bought a WRT320N, and experience some big lag in games that I play. I did a tracert to the WOW EU server Aszune, and got a large latency ping getting through the first part of the LAN. Like 1900 ms.
    Here is a screenie:
    I still get some lag when I connect directly through my modem and just skip my router all together, but it really sky rockets when using my router :\
    Why am I getting such terrible pings? Help is much appreciated! 

    If you cannot make any changes on the modem/router (which should be possible anyway) you can set up the WRT as simple access point.
    1. Unplug the WRT from the modem/router.
    2. Wire a computer to the WRT and open the web interface at http://192.168.0.1/ (the current IP address of your WRT).
    3. On the main setup page, disable the DHCP server and set the LAN IP address to 192.168.1.2. Save settings.
    4. You'll loose the connection. Unplug the computer.
    5. Wire one of the numbered LAN ports of the WRT to the modem/router.
    Now you only use the wireless access point and ethernet switch in the WRT. The web interface is now at http://192.168.1.2/ Remember to secure your wireless network with WPA2 and AES and a strong passphrase and change the router administration password ('admin').

Maybe you are looking for

  • Testing to see if a session has expired

    Hello all, I am trying to test to see if the user's session has expired by inserting the following code at the top of the page: HttpSession sess = request.getSession(); if(sess.getAttribute("userId")=="null"){response.sendRedirect("logon.jsp");}The p

  • Jinternalframe won't hide more than once.

    hiya, i have a jinternalframe and when i click the close button it hides, but if i show it again and then try to click the close button it doesn't hide. the following code demonstrates the problem - click open then the x to close the internalframe th

  • Why is manual sort order disabled in album view

    I created an album and added pictures. By default, the photos are displayed in sort order by date. I'd like to manually order them. However, when I select the sort order drop down box, the option to manually order the photos is disabled. How can I en

  • Images don't always display

    At http://debseitz.com/press.htm, the Cosmik Interview doesn't display the images all the time, yet sometimes it does. All help fixing that is welcome! Thanks

  • Error 16820 during free download?

    trying to download Acrobat XI.  Diownloaded the download_install asistant.  no Automatic download of acrobt XI.  error code 16820 instead.