Limit Order & SAP note 1355894

Hi,
We are running SRM 550 at SP13, SAP have released a note 1355894 in SP16 that seems to imply that the category type for a Limit order should be B = Limit not D = Service. That seems logical?
Our current system configuration enters an S, and although in general this works OK, we do occasionally have an issue when a user tries to reverse a limit order confirmation in SRM. The system will not allow it because a service entry sheet has been generated for the back end PO.
As we have not activated the service part of SRM, our users do not have access to reverse the service entry sheet and so this function must be carried out by a BPO or CCC team member with full access.
Does everyone end up with an S for a Limit Order item category type in their back end system?
If you have this, what problems do you get.?
Can anyone who has implemented the note 1355894 in an SRM 550 system let me know what the effect was?
Thanks in advance
Allen Brooks
SRM BPO
Sunderland City Council

Muthu,
Thanks for your reply.
If I am understanding you correctly, this note only works where a supplier has No Confirmation Expected entered against the master record.
The note is not very clear on this point and then the question remains, why do we need to use S for one entry and B for another?
As we always expect confirmations for all our PO's it would appear that the note may have no effect on our systems so rather than applying the note in advance we will wait until we get to the SP16 application in the year ????.
Thanks for the info this question is now answered.
Regards
Allen Brooks
SRM BPO
Sunderland City Council

Similar Messages

Change in account assignment for Limit Order SRM not replicated to backend

User has made in SRM (5.0 Ext Classic scenario) a limit shopping cart with Invoice and Confirmation and Acc. assigment 'Known' . This resulted in a PO with has been replicated to backend . In MM PO with Imtem category 'D' has been created.
The user know reports that he has made wrong account assignment and asks for change so that the new cost assigment appears in his Confirmations as proposal.
Normally I am able to do this through Tx 'process purchase order' (BBP_POC) in SRM and it is properly replicated to backend - meaning PO in MM is updated with new cost assigment
However for this limit order the changes I have made in BBP_POC seems not to be replicated into backend and hence on goods receipt it still shows the old assigment.
Anyone an idea of cause for this?
Thanks in advance for any reply or help

Hello,
1) Are you seeing any errors in rz20.
2) You may consider transferring the PO again to the backed using the function module BBP_PD_PO_TRANSFER_EXEC.
3) If you see any account assignment errors , check the account assignment in SRM and ERP PO are the same or as mapped in the table BBP_C_ACC
Regards,
Pavan

SAP Note 144253 For error Enter valid delivery plant in sales order

Hi all,
I am getting the error "Enter valid delivery plant" while creating the sales order . This is due to Customer and plant are same .
For that I got one SAP Note 144253.
If anyone implimented this SAP note Could you please share is there any impact of this note after implimenting.
Thanks
CM

Hi,
Go to bellow links,
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw04/helpdata/en/60/8def3981fe5d7de10000000a114084/content.htm
http://www.sap-basis-abap.com/bc/steps-to-install-sap-note.htm
Thanks,
Raviteja

Tax field not showing in limit orders

Hi,
The tax field is not showing in limit orders, we need to be able to change it. Is there any way of doing this?
John

Hi John
In SPRO,
Tax settings
No tax calculation
No tax is calculated
Tax calculation occurs in the R/3 System
Tax calculation occurs via RFC in the R/3 System in Financial Accounting. If an external system is connected to the R/3 System (Vertex or Taxware, for example), this is automatically called from the R/3 System.
What is the settings here.
If you were setting is No tax calculation , no tax field will not be shown in basic data.
update me.
regards
muthu

SAP BRIM Provider Order does not generate a Provider Contract

Hello Experts,
can anyone provide a reason why a provider order does not generate a provider contract when the Button "Submit" is clicked?
The status of the order is set to "Released" (like it should) but there is no new contract and no error message.
Thank you
Best Regards
Vanessa

Hi Vanessa,
starting point for analysis: Check the log of actions (PPF actions) on provider order header level.
The contracts are created by a standard action that is scheduled for status "released", "order modified" and no error state.
If you maintained customer transaction types/item categories -> maybe there's something missing for the copy control.
Or another common missing setting: number range for provider contracts.
Best regards
Stefan

Open Sales Order values not getting updated after run RVKRED77 & RVKRED88

Hiiii,
In Production Server. We run the reports RVKRED77 & RVKRED88. Credit info structure and and Open Sales Order values not getting updated. In FD32, Status - Sales value it showing '0". At the time of creating Sales Order Dynamic Credit check not happening coz of Tables S066 not updating. Please provide me Solution.
Best Regards,
Sridhar . P

Dear Heagal,
I followed your suggestions and implemented in the Development and moved the changes in to Quality Server. I tested it thoroughly by creating New Customer and maintained Credit Limit. I come to know that Problem is in all Servers. I made 3 changes.
1. In Pricing Procedure Sub Total A it was not maintained against Net value. I placed it.
2. Removed Credit groups for Delivery Type.
3. In OVA8 i maintained Max. Doc Value :99,999,999.00 before it was with 1.00
I checked the OMO1 Settings it was Asynchronous. As SAP Notes Suggesting to use Synchronous but here it's a client setting. So, It's Can't possible to change. Changes will affect other Company Codes.
Tested both in DVP and QTY Dynamic Credit Check is working Perfectly and Status in FD33 Sales Value field getting update.
If i move these changes in to Production, Will i need to run the reports again or not? How it will affect on Old Cusomer Billing and Credit Limit data. For few of the Customers the Credit Limit data it was exceeded. Please provide me advice. The issue need to be Solved immediately.
Best Regards,
Sridhar

Performance credit master data (FD32)--SAP Note 705317

Hi,
When running the FD32 tranasaction,I am changing the credit account and saving the transaction...it is taking quite a long time and going for dump....TIME_OUT error.
The appropriate notes for this problem are 705317 and 9937.
I shall give the details details of the note.
SymptomLong runtimes occur for the reorganization of credit data in SD documents.
This reorganization can occur in two situation:
- You start report RFDKLI20.
- You create or change credit master data in Transaction FD32.
Reason and PrerequisitesIn the credit management, you change assignments in Customizing or create or change
credit master data. The transfer of the changed settings into existing SD documents
requires a reorganization of these documents.
The reorganization is triggered from Transaction FD32 or using report RFDKLI20. Since
the relevant partner function in the credit management is the payer, all open sales
documents for a payer are selectedfor the reorganization.
The selection is performed within function module SD_CREDIT_RECREATE, which is called
from both Transaction FD32 and report RFDKLI20.
The documents are selected according to one of the two following options:1. Partner index VAKPA
The relevant documents are selected via partner index VAKPA. In index table VAKPA,
the system updates all SD documents for a customer number in dependency on the
partner function. All documents for a payer can be determined using index table
VAKPA.
CAUTION: Partner index VAKPA is only updated if the corresponding partner
functions and transactions are activated in Customizing table TINPA. Table TINPA
does not provide any update for the payer partnerfunction in the standard system!
2. Document table VBPA
If the update for the payer is not active in table TINPA, the relevant documents
are selected via application table VBPA. Table VBPA contains the used partners
(customer numbers) for SD documents.
The access to table VBPA with the customer number of the payer requires a long
SAP Note Nr. 705317 07.02.2008 Page 1
runtime because the customer number is not a key field in table VBPA. It might
result in a TIME_OUT.
Solution
Due to the technical conditions described above, there are two possible solutions for
runtime problems in Transaction FD32 or with report RFDKLI20:
1. Activate the update of index table VAKPA for the payer partner function:
Activate the update of index table VAKPA for the payer partner function by
creating an entry with transaction = 0, partner function = RG in table TINPA. You
can use Transaction SM31 for that.
Subsequently, a reorganization of index table VAKPA is absolutely required!! You
can execute the reorganization with report RVV05IVB. Note that all existing SD
documents thus also those ones already closed are indexed again by this report.
Depending on the number of your documents in the system, this can result in a
runtime which is correspondingly long. Therefore test this beforehand in a copy of
your production system!
2. Create a database secondary index for table VBPA:
If a reorganization of index table VAKPA is not possible or not wanted, you can
optimize the access via document table VBPA. For that, create a database secondary
index for table VBPA.
We cannot provide a general recommendation on how you have to define the secondary
index in detail. This basically depends on your dataset.
Use the SQL trace with Transaction ST05 in order to analyze the access onto table
VBPA within function module SD_CREDIT_RECREATE. Then define a suitable database
secondary index for table VBPA according to your analysis results.
For example, you could create the secondary index for VBPA fields KUNNR and PARVW.
Test the new secondary index by creating an SQL trace with Transaction ST05 again
in order to check the effectiveness of the database access and the runtime.
Also take the related notes into account.
Use Note 99937 to avoid the automatic reorganization - and thus runtime problems - in
Transaction FD32. Note that this does not solve the runtime problem during the
reorganization in general, but shifts it to RFDKLI20 which you can schedule as a job.
Thus, you are not disturbed by the runtime problem.
Please can anyone help me as to in which table and what fields i need to take to create secondary index.Thank you,
madhu.

Hi
Instead of creating Indexxes u contact basis to increase the the time limit for the execution
Regards
Shiva

Custom field in limit order Details screen

hi all,
i am trying to add cuf.field called purch. Group which is not present in limit orders details -> Basic data tab. one of the structure has the value of purchasing group so i didn't include any custom field in shopping cart items structure "CI_BBP_ITEM_SC". just i want to map this value to the custom screen field for display only .when i see in the SAP GUI it is visible but not in the ITS Screen. do i need to change the internet service file if so Pls help me..
helpfull answers will be rewarded...
Thanks,
Henry

Hi Henry,
You can use the 'Append structure' concept to add custom screen field and use one of the BAPIs to assign values to it. The value could come from the shopping cart item structure.
You dont need to change the ITS for it.
Thanks,
Waheed

Automatic creation of limit order

Hi,
We have a limit SC with an assigned source of supply (contract). But after approval this SC becomes a PR in ECC and not a PO directly. We are in classic scenario and all SC with source of supply should do that (including limit orders).
What could be wrong?
br
Anders

when Buyer creates a limit shopping cart after approval PO must be created since partner function registered as 19 .
so kindly check any BADI implemented to change the above behavior .
Note 1243836 - Manual entry of invalid contract allowed in contract limit
Note 1417491 - Adding a contract is not allowed in limit Shopping Cart
Is it works fine without contract ?
sap rule
In the extended classic scenario, contract limit fields were enabled for limit Sopping Cart.
In the extended classic scenario, you cannot assign a contract to a limit item. In the classic scenario, you can, as long as the confirmation and invoice flag is checked (it is not possible if only the invoice flag is checked). However, this is possible in the local scenario,that is you can assign a contract to a limit item in the local case (not extended), if the invoice only flag is checked.

Blocked sales order is not released from VKM3

Hi
We are using credit management and when a sales order is created with the amount, which is more than credit limit, system is blocking the sales order for delivery. Values are getting updated in FD32 and S066 and S067. When i tried to release the sales order from VKM3, sales order was displayed, but when i selected the release flag and saved it, still the order is not released. Order is having credit limit block in sales order in shipping tab at header level. Why system is not releasing the sales order even it is displayed in VKM3
Please respond
Regards
Srinivas

hi,
check the following steps of assignment you did right or not
1)first check in t- code FD32 U assigned authorization person & each credit limit U shud assign
an authorization person along with credit limit
2) check - conditon records with KRML output is there or not
please read standard SAP config help as a check point doc.....[Credit mgmt|http://help.sap.com/printdocu/core/Print46c/en/data/pdf/SDBFCM/SDBFCM.pdf]
let me know if it is soling your issue
Regards,
Rajeev

Limit order items to be sent back to sourcing on deletion

Hi all,
We are on SRM 7.1 Extended classic.
Can anyone confirm if the limitatin on the LIMIT orders not being sent back to SOURCING even after the PO items are deleted is stilll valid in SRM 7.1.???
Also we want to use LIMIT orders instead of service orders in SRM 7 as there are seevral issues when users try creating carts with the SERVICE HIERARCHY.To avoid the manual errors,we would like to use limit orders in SRM and then if required when the PO items are deletd in SRM the items should be sent back to sourcing.
If the limitation for the LIMIT orders items still hold true for SRM 7,then is there a way or enhancement to enable the sending of limit orders back to sourcing once the items are deleted in the PO in SRM?
I know the report responsible for snding items back to sourcing is BBP_GET_STATUS_2 and CLEAN_REQREQ_UP but is there a way we can handle the sendng of the PO items back to sourcing base don some custom logic for limit orders or for that matter any type of PO created in SRM?
Pls advise.

The note 1247922 is for EXTERNAL requirements/Purchase requsitions in ECC backend system and is not what I'm looking for.
Neverthless,I will create an OSS message with SAP and check if tehre is any enhancmenet available for sending limit items back to sourcing on PO deletion.Will update the thread accordingly
Thanks for the help.

Vendor in Limit Order SC Template won't stay changed when creating PO.

We are currently using SRM 4.0 in an extended classic Scenario. The problem we have experience is as follows:
User creates a SC with a Limit Order template that has a vendor already assigned. Once the template is selected the vendor is then changed along with other information necesarry to create the SC. The SC is then saved and approve and a PO is created. The PO in the backend system (R/3) has the vendor that was originally on the template. When pulling up the PO in SRM the vendor shows the vendor that was originally on the template as well but when clicking on the details button and going into the PO the PO shows the vendor that was changed at the time the SC was created. So the vendor in SRM is correct but the vendor in the backend shows the original vendor which is not correct.
Has anyone seen this issue? Can you not use a template that already has a source of supplier and change it once it's use to create a SC?

Hi Robert,
I think,this issue is already resolved by SAP .
Please look for OSS note on this issue.
I have found notes which may be useful
Note 708047 - Error when transferring items of old limit shopping baskets.
Note 724261 - Limit: Error during creation of local purchase order
SAP has provided an independent component for Limit PO,please give a blank search on that component with component.
component :SRM-EBP-SCL
regards,nishant
please reward point if this helps.

Problem with Unknown account assignment with limit order...reply soon...

Hello All,
i am facing problem in confirming the limit order with unknown account assinment.We are using Extended classic scenario with SRM version 5.00 and ECC 6.00. When creating shopping cart with unknown account assignments, shopping carts is getting created fine but when processing goods receipt the system only prompts for distribution by cost center and we do not have the option to selected processing against other account assignment e.g. internal order or network. the Cost center is coming as gray.What i am expecting that as in known account assignment it asks for a drop down and user can select cost center or order the same should happened with unknown account assignment. we have not implemented any badi for the same.
please help me out. Is this a standard behavior of shop with limit order for unknown account assignment where it prompts for cost center only or do i need to implement any badi.

Hi
Related links/ SAP OSS Notes to check out ->
Note 861889 - Limitations on limit and service PO's in case of ECS
Note 1046593 - Limit PO - Unable to delete and create new item
Note 966323 - Service Item: Not able to create PO in ERP backend
Note 969077 - LIMIT:SC with Account Assignment Unknown and IR_IND checked
Note 1000184 - Account assignment error when document transfer to back end
Note 1052892 - Account Assignment not visible for Limit Shopping Cart
Note 933618 - Multiple account assignments for limit item are lost
Re: Limit PO(Item category D instead of B)
SE 518 No account assignment exists for service li ne 0000000000
Creating SC with Dummy Account Assignment
Re: Account assignment on SRM
Re: Problem on account assignment
Re: Account details not coming while creating a Shopping Cart with Limit Item
LIMIT SC
Other related details ->
Use Screen variants (Transaction - SHD0) to change item overview and search result screens.
BADI - There is one BADI to hide/show some SC item creation links, there is one BADI to control screen details of PO, CTR... but not SC (and not external screens).
So, as usual, identify the template and change the HTML code in SE80.
To implement a more complex logic, like the default check box, change the ABAP code (usually in the PBO), if required.
Do let me know.
Regards
- Atul

Error in Limit order SC

Error in Value limit Shopping cart.
Steps are given below
1. Create limit order with limit value 400 USD
2. Put the shopping cart on Hold
3. Click change button to edit the shopping basket
4. change the limit value into 600 USD and submit the shopping cart.
If we check the shopping cart, the limit value will be 400 USD only (old value), new value (600) will not be appearing in the shopping cart.
Please assist.
Edited by: Antony Akkara on Jan 30, 2011 12:38 PM
Edited by: Antony Akkara on Jan 30, 2011 12:41 PM

Muthu,
1. SRM 3.0
2. SP Details
SAP_BASIS    620     0060 SAPKB62060 SAP Basis Component     Basis Support Pkg.
SAP_ABA          620        0060 SAPKA62060 Cross-Application Component     Appl. Interface SP
BBPCRM          400        0011 SAPKU40011 BBPCRM     BBP/CRM Supp. Pack.
PI_BASIS     2003_1_620     0007 SAPKIPYH57 PI_BASIS 2003_1_620     Add-on Support Pkg.
ST-PI          2005_1_620     0007 SAPKITLQG7 SAP Solution Tools Plug-In     Add-on Support Pkg.
WP-PI          600_620     0000     -       WP-PI 600_620 : Add-On Installation     Add-on Support Pkg.
ST-A/PI          01J_CRM400     0000     -       Application Servicetools BBPCRM 400     Add-on Support Pkg.
3. BADI implementation
     Z_EBPCW_DOC_CHANGE
     Z_EBPCW_DOC_CHECK
4. value stored in BBP_PD
     First time values are correct, after changing the value it is not correct.
Thanks in advance

Limit Order

Hi,
We are working on Classic Scenario. When the user tries to raise a limit order shopping cart, the storage location is not saved in the Shopping Cart and hence not reflected in the PO in R/3. The plant and storage location in user profile are defaulted but still the shopping cart and PO contain only the plant code and not the storage location. The user wants storage location in both.
Please suggest a solution.
Regards,
Manish.

Hi. When you create a limit item there is less information available in the cart item.
You can not change plant, company code and so on, only the defaults work.
We asked SAP and they said the system was built like this.
This probably applies to storage location. You can not have a limit order for stock, so they probably exclude storage location.
If you want to set it try the BBP_CREATE_PO_BACK BADI to change it in the PO, or BBP_DOC_CHANGE_BADI to change it in the cart.
Regards,
Dave.

Limit Order & SAP note 1355894

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for