Linking 2 separate htmls with different dimension (one in % and other in pixel)

I have a project with stage in %. I inserted a jotform but it won't scroll. So, I created onther project with fixed dimension and saved it in the same place and the main page i.e. index.html and the contact.html are in the same folder. Now, how can I make them work together. What I want to do is to load the contact.html on its own when I click the contact tab in the index.html.
Basically, I want to have a responsive layout but the form will only work if the stage is the same height. For some reason, if i create a symbol with the fixed dimension, the form won't scroll to reveal the page but just cuts out in the middle. But it works when I created a new project with the fixed dimension as the form and called it contact.html, which can be scrolled(just how I want it). BTW, it works on the laptop browser. Problem is with the tablets and smartphones. So, now I want to have the responsive layout i.e. index as the main page which will have the contact me tab which will open the contact.html on its own, not inside the main layout. I want the height of the form fixed so that it will work on the phones and tablets.
I hope I am clear and I am sorry for asking. I am stuck so I can only raise my hand in the classroom and ask, hoping that someone can help.
Many thanks in advance.

Thank you for you response Elaine. I tried as you suggested but didn't work. 
Error Message I got was:

Similar Messages

  • Matrix with different dimensions for each column

    Hi,
    I would like to have a matrix with different dimensions (rows) for each
    column, for example, I want the first column has 3 rows, the second one
    5 rows, the third one 10 rows, and so on.....
    With a simple array it is not possible, and then I make an array (for
    my columns) of clusters and each cluster has another array (rows for
    that column). Is it the best way to do it? Is it correct?
    Thanks,
    ToNi.

    Yes, everything we told you in this old thread  is still true!
    LabVIEW Champion . Do more with less code and in less time .

  • The procedure to change kernel of system with database of one MT and dia. i

    Hello
    I wander what is procedure to change kernel of system with database instance of one machine type(i.e. HP-UX) and dialog instance of other MT type (i.e. Linux).
    I usually change kernel on path /usr/sap/<SID>/SYS/exe/run
    But in this case there will be two kernels(where I should copy them

    Hi,
    As I understand, Your CI/DB on Hp-UX and dialog instance on Linux.. For kernel upgrade check below link:
    SAP Kernel update on different Operating System
    Thanks
    Sunny

  • By subscribing to Creative Cloud(Photoshop and Lightroom), does it come with more than one license, and is it possible to install it on both Windows and Apple(if it comes with two licenses)? Thank you.

    By subscribing to Creative Cloud(Photoshop and Lightroom), does it come with more than one license, and if it does, is it possible to install on both Windows and Apple's OX? Thanks.

    A Cloud subscription provides for installing working installations on two machines.  You can have mixed operating systems (both Windows and Apple's OX).

  • Iam not able to share internet in windows 8 from my macbook air...though my iphone ipad is connected to the hotspot well..tried everything but it seems to be different from windows 7  and other microsft operating systems setting. help!!

    Iam not able to share internet in windows 8 from my macbook air...though my iphone ipad is connected to the hotspot well..tried everything but it seems to be different from windows 7  and other microsft operating systems setting. help!!

    Ask on a Windows forum since that's what you're having a problem with.

  • Can I enable pof serialization for one cache and other JAVA serialization

    I had coherence cluster with few cache , Is there any way i can enable pof serialization for one cache and other to use normal JAVA serialization

    839051 wrote:
    I had coherence cluster with few cache , Is there any way i can enable pof serialization for one cache and other to use normal JAVA serializationHi,
    you can control serialization on a service-by-service basis. You can specify which serializer to use for the service with the <serializer> element in the service-scheme element corresponding to the service in the scache configuration file.
    Be aware, though, that if you use Coherence*Extend, and the service serializer configuration for the proxy service does not match the serializer configuration of the service which you are proxying to the extend client then the proxy node has to de- and reserialize the data which it moves between the service and the client.
    Best regards,
    Robert

  • When I use Thunderbird with Yahoo Groups, Google groups, and other email lists, I don't get a copy of my own emails back from the list (I do with Mail.app)...?

    When I use Thunderbird with Yahoo Groups, Google groups, and other email lists, I don't get a copy of my own emails back from the list. I *do* when I use Mail, so it seems like a Thunderbird thing. I'd really like to see my own emails come back to me in the conversation so that I know where my remarks fall in the discussion; it's very disorienting when you can't tell if your email has arrived at the list, or not. I can't seem to find the setting, and I've searched thru your help topics, etc., to no avail. Thanks.

    It's both gmail and mac.com email accounts, and it's all email lists -- including some privately hosted on servers, that are not Google groups, not Yahoo groups.
    I'm not sure what you mean by "saving a copy of your messages yourself" in Mail -- if I email to the lists with Mail on my laptop or iPad, I can see it on my desktop computer too, right in line with other email messages in the thread, after the list resends the message I've submitted. It's only Thunderbird that this "invisible posts" behavior happens, and it didn't use to happen this way. I used to get my emails posting right in the thread.

  • Joining two fact tables with different dimensions into single logical table

    Hi Gurus,
    I try to accomplish in Oracle Business Intelligence 11.1.1.3.0:
    F1 (D1, D2 and D3)
    F2 (D1 and D2 and D4)
    And we want to build a report F1 F2 D1 D2 D3 D4 to have data for:
    F1 that match only for D1-D2-D3
    and data for
    F2 that match only D1-D2-D4
    all that in one row, so D3 and D4 are not common dimensions.
    I can only do:
    F3 (D1, D2)
    F4 (D1, D2 and D4)
    And report
    F3 F4 D1,D2,D4 (all that in one row, and only D4 is not a common dimension)
    Here is the very good example how to accomplish the scenario 1
    http://108obiee.blogspot.com/2009/08/joining-two-fact-tables-with-different.html
    But looks like it does not work in 11.1.1.3.0
    I get
    State: HY000. Code: 10058. [NQODBC] [SQL_STATE: HY000] [nQSError: 10058] A general error has occurred. [nQSError: 43113] Message returned from OBIS. [nQSError: 14025] No fact table exists at the requested level of detail: [,,Clients,,Day,ROI,,,,EW_Names,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,]. (HY000)
    I am sure I set up everything correctly as advised in the blog but it works with only one not a common dimension
    Is it a bug in 11.1.1.3.0 or something?
    Thanks,
    Kate

    Thanks for all your replies.
    Actually, I've tried the solutions you guys mentioned. Generally speaking, the result should be displayed. However, my scenario is a little bit tricky.
    table Y's figures are not the aggregation of table X for D dimension. Instead, table Y's figures include not only D dimension total, but also others (others do not mean A, B, C dimension). For example, table Y stores all food's figure, while table X stores only drink's figure. D dimension is only about drink's detail. In my scenario, other foods' figure is not provided.
    So, even if I set D dimension to all/total for table X, table X's result is still not the same as table Y.
    Indeed, table Y does not have a column key to join to D dimension's key. So, if I select D dimension and table Y's measures at the same time in BI Answer, result returns no data. Hence, I can't compare table X and table Y's results with selection of D dimension.
    Is there any solution to solve this problem?
    Edited by: TomChan on Jun 3, 2009 9:36 AM

  • Batch processing images with different dimensions

    Hi all!
    I've been trying to do this for a while and I'm stumped, so I'd like to know if it's even possible. I'm trying to fathom out how to create an action which…
    Takes a jpg
    draws a shape
    masks the image
    adds another shape
    So I can batch process a ton of images.
    I managed to do something like what I'm after but the thing I'm having trouble with is that the original images will have different dimensions.
    I have attached (via link) an example image which would be the original (start.jpg), one which would be the desired end result (done.jpg) and the .psd
    IF there needs to be a step in the middle of the action where I need to intervene and resize the flat image slightly to fit the canvas it'll still save a load of time.
    I know that opening and saving will be taken care of using the batch feature and the result only needs to be a jpg.
    Any input will be welcomed!
    Here are the working files - http://mikeebee.com/dl/action-test.zip
    Many thanks

    That's an interesting action, but I thought the expected output was different than what this action produces. First, I didn't think image cropping would have been ok (maybe the OP expects this or is ok with cropping). Secondly, I kept getting caught up in how the right edge was going to actually be skewed (as decreasing in size perspectively off into the distance). This action appears to just visually trick the eye (again which may be what the OP wanted or is ok with). Like I said, just that aspect alone is where I kept getting stuck in how this would be possible without some manual manipulation.
    If you take this image http://www.shan-dysigns.com/userForums/photoshop/stripes.jpg and perform this action, you will see how the right side doesn't actually get skewed (as I thought was part of the visual effect wanted). Still, this action is quite nice.

  • Logical fact table with fragmented data sources with different dimensions

    Hello.
    I have a logical fact table with four logical table sources. Three of the LTS's share the same dimensions, but the fourth LTS has one dimension (called Dim_A) less. In the physical layer the dimension Dim_A is joined to the first three physical fact tables, but not to the fourth fact table (since it doesn't have that dimensionality). In the BMM layer the logical fact table is joines to the logical dimansion Dim_A.
    When I run an analysis on this RPD the measures from the logical fact is aggregated correctly (union of all four table sources) as long as I doesn't include Dim_A, but as soon as I include dimension Dim_A I get the error message:
    +State: HY000. Code: 10058. [NQODBC] [SQL_STATE: HY000] [nQSError: 10058] A general error has occurred. [nQSError: 43113] Message returned from OBIS. [nQSError: 43119] Query Failed: [nQSError: 14052] Internal Error: Logical column Dim_A.Column_X has no physical sources that can be joined to the physical fact table source [Logical table sources (Priority=0): Fact_B.Fact_Y]. (HY000)+
    I would like a solution where the analysis returns correctly aggregated measures also for the LTS with the "missing" dimension, but with a dimension value NULL for this LTS. Or something like this.
    Is there a way to set this up in the RPD.
    Thanks,
    Henning Eriksen

    The SQL could look something like this.
    SELECT dim_a.col_1, fact_a.measure_1
    FROM db.dim_a
    JOIN
    db.fact_a
    ON fact_a.col_2 = dim_a.col_2
    WHERE fact_a.date = '28-nov-2012'
    UNION ALL
    SELECT dim_a.col_1, SUM (fact_b.measure_1)
    FROM db.dim_a
    JOIN
    db.fact_b
    ON fact_b.col_2 = dim_a.col_2
    WHERE fact_b.date = '28-nov-2012'
    UNION ALL
    SELECT dim_a.col_1, SUM (fact_c.measure_1)
    FROM db.dim_a
    JOIN
    db.fact_c
    ON fact_c.col_2 = dim_a.col_2
    WHERE fact_c.date = '28-nov-2012'
    UNION ALL
    SELECT NULL, SUM (fact_d.measure_1)
    FROM    db.fact_d
    WHERE fact_d.date = '28-nov-2012'
    I would appreciate if you could give me some hints for the RPD.
    Thanks,
    Henning

  • 2 facts with different dimensions in 1 logical table

    hello,
    im trying to accomplish the set up as described per blog:
    http://108obiee.blogspot.com/2009/08/joining-two-fact-tables-with-different.html
    i.e. i have 2 facts, F1: D1 ; F2: D1,D2,D3;
    i followed the instructions and all seem to be working fine;
    however: when i put the total on the report in Answers: D1,D2, F1, F2 then the measures from F1 that are repeated every row for D2 are being added , like regular sum on the column; this is not correct;
    the only correct result i can get if manually i change the Aggregation Rule to :Server Complex Aggregate on all F1 measures;
    id like to ask if this is a bug of this OBI version? 10.1.3.2
    i wish not to instruct my users to change the aggregation rule; id like to have the set up via rpd such, that they dont have to manipulate the aggregation rules;
    did anyone got the above working with correct totals without changing the aggregation rule?
    if so, id appreciate any tips on how to achieve that
    thanks
    rgds

    Basically, you need to :
    * create your physical schema with the relationship
    * drag and drop your Forecast Facts measure in the same logical table than your sales fact
    * define your Forecast measure as level based measure (logical column/levels/properties) with the grain of the forecast table
    Documentation
    http://download.oracle.com/docs/cd/E12103_01/books/admintool/admintool_BusModSetup12.html
    And you have an example in OBE series with quota in excel sheet :
    http://www.oracle.com/technology/obe/obe_bi/bi_ee_1013/bi_admin/biadmin.html#t8
    Success
    Nico

  • Cubes with different dimensions based on the same fact table

    I have a fact table (f_a) with three dimensions (dim_a, dim_b, dim_c) and a one measure (m_a).
    Is it possible to create cube with only one dimension (dim_a)?
    Data for other two dimensions (dim_b, dim_c) should be aggreagated together.
    Of course i can create second fact table with only one dimension, and then creating that cube would be no problem.
    But is it possible doing this directly from the primary fact table (without creating second fact table)?
    Raf
    PS:i use AWM 9.2 to create target cubes. Source cubes i create with OEM 9.2

    At the beginning i was confused by the numberous kind of cubes...
    for example when i created cube in MS i just designed cube, picked fact table, and that's all. In Oracle firstly i create project of cube (first cube) in OWB. Then i export it to the OLAP Catalog (second cube). That cube in OLAP catalog is a source cube for the AW cube (third cube). Then i need to enable AW cube for OLAPI by creating another cube in OLAP Catalog (i use 9iR2, so OLAPI doesn't have direct access to AW cubes).
    I spent much time until i could see my first sample cube in Discoverer or Excel as a final user should see it. :-)
    Now i'm facing another problem - when you redesign cube (for example add another dimension), you can't just "refresh" it as it was in MS. You have to delete old cube and create new one. And deleting cube isn't so simple (i'm not sure which elements i should delete).
    For testing and learning purposes i just create every cube in seperate AW. deleting whole AW is much simplier that deleting one cube.
    Raf

  • Wny does ACR 7.3 open a .JPG with different dimensions than PS 13.0.1 x64?

    I have a .jpg file that opens in Photoshop 13.0.1 x64 as an image with dimensions of 5588 x 4627 pixels. If I set Photoshop to open it in ACR 7.3 it opens with dimensions 4453 x 4418 with the image looking squished horizontally and cropped at the top.
    I captured the image on a Nikon D600. I developed the NEF with DxO Optics Pro 8.1.1 and output a TIFF. I opened the TIFF in Photoshop (without using ACR) and did my editing including  some transformation to create mirrored wrap for a canvas. There are versions saved as PSDs. I resized the image for output and used PS to create a JPG. That JPG causes the strange (to me) behavior when Photoshop tries to open the file.
    I used the same PSD to create multiple JPGs with differing levels of quality (varyiing from 9MB to 27MB). Photoshop exhibits the same behavior on all of them.
    If I process the JPG thruough ACR, the resultant image retains the bad dimensions and distortions.
    The Adobe "chat" preresentative said this was expected behavior in a 2+ hour chat. He/she said that they were able to replicate the different dimensions on their end with their images.
    Does anyone know if this is normal behavior? If so, why?
    Has anyone experienced something similar?
    Thanks,
    Joe
    I am running this on Win7 x64 Home Premium with 8 GB RAM. I also have LR 4.3 installed on the computer and previously used it to process the same NEF file.

    I sent the JPG to a service for a print on canvas. They reported that the image was not the proper size and shape when they opened it in Photoshop. Unfortunately I have not been able to get them to tell me what pixel size it was, just rough inches (!?!?!). So I started trying things in Photoshop and came up with this strange behavior that might explain the problem at the service.

  • How to Watermark multiple images with different dimensions in Photoshop ?

    Is there any way that I can place a watermark on the right bottom of multiple images, no matter what dimension the images are? I have tried using Photoshop Scripts > image processor, but it works only for images of same dimension. I want to put watermark on multiple images of different dimensions. This is the output i got.
    For the first image the watermark got placed correctly, but for the second image watermark got distracted. As you can clearly see the dimensions are different. Please suggest me some solution.

    Open an image to watermark. We must have this open before we start recording an action or else it will keep opening this image and watermarking it over and over again.
    In Photoshop go to Windows >> Actions
    At the bottom of the Actions Palette you will see a little folder icon, click on it and create a new folder to hold you action in.
    Once you have a folder to hold your action we need to hit the Create New Action button (next to the new folder Icon we just used.)
    Give our new action a name and set a function key (if required.)
    If the record button is not already depressed which it should be by default, hit it now to start recording our action. (located near the folder icon again but this time to the left)
    Now that our action is recording go to File >> Place
    When the dialog box comes up navigate to your previously created watermark file.
    Hit the Place button
    Position the watermark as you would normally have it (default is dead center) and hit enter.
    Go to File >> Save as,navigate to where you want your watermarked images to finish up and hit save. DO NOT CHANGE THE FILE NAME if you do when you play the batch it will name all the files it saves the same over-writing each other.
    Close the image we just watermarked.
    when a save dialog comes up do not save the image.
    On the Actions Palette hit stop recording.
    Our Action is now recorded.
    To process an entire folder of images we go to File >> Automate >> Batch
    Select the folder in which your images are currently
    Select the folder you wish to save the watermarked copies too.
    Hit OK
    Photoshop is now watermarking all the Images in the selected folder for you.

  • Page Footer : utilisation different page footers with different dimension

    In my document I use different page u2013footers sections, I know that CR takes as reserved space the minimum space of the greatest page-footer section, is there a possibility to have different page footer sections with different dimensions

    hi,
    "Clamp Page Footer" option can be used to remove extra space at the bottom of the report. This option can be used such that  each page  height varies.
    Regards,
    Vamsee

Maybe you are looking for