List View (filter) based on multiple fields

Hello. I've created an infopath form where a Project Manager is able to name 12 project members in various departments using a people picker field for each project member field. Is there a way to filter the list so that it shows only
the projects the individual project members are involved in based on whether he/she shows up in any of the 12 member fields? The members are not necessarily the ones creating the list item. I am limited to 10 filters in the view settings
in the sharepoint list so that won't work. Any assistance would be greatly appreciated.
Have a great weekend.
Cory

Hi Cory,
I’m sorry, from that way you can filter by current user, but also can’t add more than 10 parameters. The only way to add
more than 10 filters is to use xpath by check add xslt filtering, then click edit.
I have a try on my server, please check the following steps.
Create a parameter by click parameters.
On the data view parameters dialog, click new parameter, name Param1. From parameter source, select server variable, set LOGON_USER as server available name. Then click ok.
Go to filter, on filter criteria dialog, check add xslt filtering, then click edit.
Add the following xslt code.
[@people.title=$Param1 or @people1.title=$Param1 or @people2.title=$Param1 or @people3.title=$Param1 or @people4.title=$Param1
or @people5.title=$Param1 or @people6.title=$Param1 or @people7.title=$Param1 or @people8.title=$Param1 or @people9.title=$Param1 or @people10.title=$Param1 or @people11.title=$Param1]
Best Regards.
Kelly Chen
TechNet Community Support

Similar Messages

List View Filter - I want to create List View based on a specific user

I want to create a List View Filter based on specified user ID. I dont want to specify the [Me] for filtering the view based in current logged in User.
I want the view to be based on specific user ID for Ex: "AD\JohnDoe"
Thanks
Nate

The People/Group Picker field has several options for how the name is displayed. For example you can set it to be the friendly name or the account name. When you create your View Filter, make sure that you are using the same format as the field's display
type.
Dimitri Ayrapetov (MCSE: SharePoint)

Multiple IDOCs based on multiple fields in File to IDOC mapping

Hello Experts,
     I have a requirement to create multiple IDOCs based on multiple fields.
     Earlier my requirement is to create IDOCs based on ShipID (i.e., for every ShipID new IDOC...I achieved this).
     But now the requirement was to create IDOC based on two more fields like
Source:
     ShipID1
     FieldA with value1
     FieldB with value1
Target :
     1 IDOC to create
and If
Source:
     ShipID1
     FiledA with Value2
     FiledB with Value2
     ShipID1
     FiledA with Value1
     FiledB with Value2
Target:
     2 IDOCs based on FiledA
Like wise IDOC should create for every change in FiledA and FieldB.
If FiledA and FiledB has no changes then create IDOC based on ShipID
please help me in achieving this as this is an urgent requirement.

Hi Prasad -
Just concat all the three fields - shipID1, FieldA and FieldB and
remove contexts
split by value (value changed)
collapse contexts
This way whenever there is a change in any of the above fields you'll have separate IDOC..

List view - filter with parameters

Hi,
I need to define a list view to filter data with parameters.
I saw how to do it with the SPD in another post
http://social.msdn.microsoft.com/Forums/sharepoint/en-US/92271aa4-6582-4ea5-a10f-deaf02d2b62c/filtering-the-list-view-by-passing-date-parameters-using-sharepoint-desginer-2010?forum=sharepointcustomizationprevious
But need to do it in visual Studio (via definitins or Object Model).
How can I do that in Visual Studio?
Help is really appreciated.
Many thanks,
DD

Hi,
According to your description, you might want to create a list definition with the filter value from query string from URL. Then when you create a list instance with this list
definition, you will be able to filter the list view page by appending parameters to the URL in the address bar.
You can achieve this through modifying the Schema.xml file in the list definition project in Visual Studio like this:
How to create custom list definition
http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/office/gg276355(v=office.14).aspx
http://www.codeproject.com/Articles/412429/SharePoint-Create-List-Definition-and-Instanc
CAML Query Schema
http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/office/ms467521(v=office.15).aspx
Then we can filter the list with such an URL:
http://sp/Lists/List1/AllItems.aspx?Param1=2014-08-24&Param2=2014-08-28
Best regards,
Patrick
Patrick Liang
TechNet Community Support

Primary key based on multiple fields which are of a custom class type

Hello!
I have the following two classes.
public class Application
protected String appName;
protected Set moduleOptions = new HashSet(); //Set<ModuleOption>
public class Option
protected String name;
protected Application application;
Now, I need for Option to have a composite primary key based on both its
fields. How do I do this?
For starters, I just need a few hints on how this should be done in Kodo
because I already have this thing working in JPOX and that solution does
not map directly to Kodo. JPOX defines the OptionPK (primary key class)
to contain field ApplicationPK, and not Application. But Kodo does not
accept this because of a mismatch between fields in class and its primary
key class. (Not implying that Kodo should accept the same kind of
solution.)
Btw, I'm evaluating version 3.2.3.
Thanks in advance!

Viktor,
The typical Kodo pattern for doing this is to create a private field in
Option for each primary key in Application, map those fields as
primary-key (but not the field of type Application), and therefore put
those fields in the OptionPK. These fields should then be mapped to the
same columns as the Application reference. Then, set the primary key
fields to the same value as they are in the related object.
Kodo allows multiple fields to be mapped to the same column in the
database, and throws an exception if your actions would set the column
to different values. So, typically, this might look like:
public class Application
protected String appName; // I'm assuming that this is the PK
protected Set moduleOptions = new HashSet ();
public class Option
protected String name; // pk
protected Application application; // not pk
private String applicationAppName; // pk
public Option (String n, Application a)
name = n;
application = a;
applicationAppName = a.appName;
-Patrick
Viktor Matic wrote:
Hello!
I have the following two classes.
public class Application
protected String appName;
protected Set moduleOptions = new HashSet(); //Set<ModuleOption>
public class Option
protected String name;
protected Application application;
Now, I need for Option to have a composite primary key based on both its
fields. How do I do this?
For starters, I just need a few hints on how this should be done in Kodo
because I already have this thing working in JPOX and that solution does
not map directly to Kodo. JPOX defines the OptionPK (primary key class)
to contain field ApplicationPK, and not Application. But Kodo does not
accept this because of a mismatch between fields in class and its primary
key class. (Not implying that Kodo should accept the same kind of
solution.)
Btw, I'm evaluating version 3.2.3.
Thanks in advance!

User Profile Department List View filter?

Any UI Way filter by [MyDepartment]? That is current user's profiled Department?
If not, any good jQuery implementation out there?

create a column with multiple department drop down and make it required
show that list/library as web part multiple times for each department. As many department as many webpart (filter by each department.
Make share audience by department
from web part advance settings, target those audience. In this way, user can only see their own department's information.
Don't grant page edit rights except owners.
Please 'propose as answer' if it helped you, also 'vote helpful' if you like this reply.

Share Point 2013 List View Filter [Me] is not showing all the relevent record

Hi
I am using [Me] to filter in custom column "EmployeeLoginName" (is group/user type)
But not able to get all the record of the loged in employee.
only showing 1 record whereas there are 7 matching record.
Any one ever faced this type of problem?
Can any one tell the reason for this.?
Thanks

Hi Syn_Suresh,
Did all 7 records have the exact current logged user's name in "EmployeeLoginName" column?
Could you reproduce the issue on other new list, and other site?
If it's not reproduced, the list may be corrupt.
Thanks
Daniel Yang
TechNet Community Support

Populating Web List from database Based on Selected Field

Hi,
I'm really new to this so pardon my ignorance on the following.
At my company, we have developed a web site using Oracle
Application Server using PL*SQL cartridge, i.e. all the
rendering of forms and processing of data are done using PL*Sql
commands.
I have a list field where I'd like the values populated from the
database using a value specified by a user in another field.
Example:
State ____ City ____________________
When user selects a state, I'd like to be able to dynamically
populate the city field with values from the database.
Does anyone have an example of how to do this? I'm guessing it
can be done using thin JDBC.
Any help would be appreciated.
Thanks
J Mathew
null

Hi Ram
for the first time when the page loads i want the trailing list to be empty ....
so in the processRequest itself i call invokeMethod and append the whereclause in the voImpl .....if a do a System.out.println("Trailing List VO ::ROW COUNT IS : "+getRowCount()); immediately after executeQuery it returns 0 ...
but some how on the page i get to see some records in the list....
Let me know if anyother info is required ...
Regards
Sunny

Is it possible to filter list view based on current user logged in

Hi,
Is it possible to filter the list view results based on the current user logged in. I have a scenario wherein i want to show only those list items to the user which contains his/her name under the column Approver (a list column).
So if i login to the page, then only those requests should show up which has my name as the Approver, and so on.
Is it possible please ?
Thank you.

Hi Prajk, you could use audience targeting for this. An alternative would be to create a view and add a filter so that "Approver" is equal to [Me]
cameron rautmann

Want to update data in a view based on multiple tables

Hi
I am facing a problem i want to update data in tables using a view. As that view is based on multiple tables so i am unable to update data. i came to know we can update table from view only if view is based on single table. so if anyone knows any alternative please let me know.
Thanx
Devinder

Devinder,
The table can be updated through a view based on multiple tables, if and only if the table is a "key preserved" table. Rather than explaining myself, i avoided the burden of typing by finding the material in Oracle Docs and pasting it for you :-)
If you want a join view to be updatable, all of the following conditions must be
true:
1. The DML statement must affect only one table underlying the join.
2. For an INSERT statement, the view must not be created WITH CHECK
OPTION, and all columns into which values are inserted must come from a
key-preserved table. A key-preserved table in one for which every primary
key or unique key value in the base table is also unique in the join view.
3. For an UPDATE statement, all columns updated must be extracted from a
key-preserved table. If the view was created WITH CHECK OPTION, join
columns and columns taken from tables that are referenced more than once
in the view must be shielded from UPDATE.
4. For a DELETE statement, the join can have one and only one key-preserved
table. That table can appear more than once in the join, unless the view was
created WITH CHECK OPTION.
HTH
Naveen

To make fields display in List view

Hi,
In PCUI, I want to make fields appear in list view in detail area1, these fields appear in form view but when I toggle it to list view it disappears, I have made nescessary settings for field group attributes but I am unable to bring those field visible in list view.
Pls suggest
Thanks in Advance
Vishal

Hi Tiest
I have appended custom fields in the screen structure, and functionally it is working fine whenever I create any transaction and it also retrives the data for custom fields when I open any transaction. These fields become visible in form view but not in list view, I have also unchecked n. List in the customizing settings for those fields.
Later I had generated the layout for that field group under my custom view.
In the personalize window only the standared fields are visible custom fields does not appear.
I am not able to understand properly what you are trying to say in this line:
Second possibility, besides have created a field group continaing the actual fields have you also created a field group typoe 'screen structure' responsible for the actual lay out.
Pls suggest where I am going wrong
Vishal

Sorted list view slow.. OS9 is better..

its when making a folder view option as a list view then sort it by date or size, the window refresh slow or it doesnt refresh at all, u still the same view even if theres more files came, or bigger file saved into that folder, like the finder forgets about this window.. and the finder suddenly wakes up when u try to double click on a file that u see in the list.. it run from u and u find that u opened a different file just because the finder forgot to keep this folder updated...
its funny that in OS9 this thing never happend.. u keep seeing every thing happens all the time folder changes files keep updates more often..
is it me or OSX? though i've been suffering from it since OSX1..
my machine is: iMac 20"/2.1GHZ/1GB RAM/250GB HD/10.4.5.. so if any one thinks its slow... its not

"i've been suffering from it since OSX1.."
I'm with you on that one (10.0 for me) - the OS X "Finder" failing to refresh windows has been a complaint since the beginning of OS X. The techie types try to tell you how inefficient "polling" is and how this way is better, completely missing the point that it doesn't matter if you save a few cpu cycles if you are wasting seconds every time you want to access a file because you can't trust what the "Finder" is showing you. I had heard that "Tiger" actually improved a lot in this area (eg. with files added through the command line), but other reports have said that "Finder" does fail to update when certain apps are adding the files (I'm actually still on "Panther").
It is truly strange that the company (if only in name) that became famous for their user-centric GUI is the same one responsible for the OS X "Finder". The "Finder" with each version of "OS X" is becoming progressively less user friendly - eg. It takes more mouse clicks to rename an item (icon & list view) in "Tiger" than in earlier versions (yes, I am aware of pressing "Return"). "Tiger" also saw the elimination of "Find", replacing it with "Spotlight", which I gather is more powerful in many ways, but has some surprising blind spots. The ⌘G "Go to Folder" function apparently no longer takes you to invisible folders (although it will take you to a visible folder within an invisible one). On the topic of "invisibles", when 'AppleShowAllFiles' is enabled, all files appear grayed out, not just the ones that would normally be invisible. I had also heard that in "Tiger", you can no longer user control-tab to rotate through the various sort criteria in "List View" (Name, Date Modified, Kind, etc.) as you could in "Panther". You can no longer disable the annoying "Are you sure" warning when you change the extension of a file as you could in "Panther". The "hot scroll zone" at the bottom of a window in "List View" has been reported to be expanded compared to "Panther", so that it is almost impossible to click on a file near the bottom of a "List view" window without selecting multiple files (the problem existed in "Panther" but apparently is much more unmanageable in "Tiger"). "Panther" saw the elimination of marquée style selection in "List View", a standard in pre OS X and something that Windows does. And just compare the gaudiness of Finder "Labels" in "Panther" and "Tiger" to the more subtle yet equally informative method used in pre-OS X. And though not exactly a "Finder" problem, the introduction in "Panther" of the automatic file renaming behaviour in "Save" dialogues (which I'm not against as a feature) was done in such a way that people are prone to lose data...
umm what were we talking about? Oh yeah, "Finder" not refreshing in a timely manner in some situations. Sorry I don't have a solution, but I agree that it is likely not a problem with your hardware, but a function of a design choice made by the "Finder" developers. And it definitely is not "just you".

How to filter based on two keywords (using And)?

Something that seems so simple but I just can't figure it out.
I've added keywords to a lot of my photos. Now I want to find all the keywords that match multiple pictures -- like with Snow AND Tree.
When I select multiple keywords using shift, it builds a filter Snow OR Tree instead of what I want, Snow AND Tree.
How do I build up a filter based on multiple keywords with AND logic?
And along the same train of thought, I imagine someday I might want to even build on this and say Nature is synonymous with Tree or Lake... and then build a filter based on Nature AND Snow. Is this possible?
Sorry for such an obvious question and thanks in advance.
Love Lightroom so far, in the 2 days I've played with it and see it as finally being a way to quickly and easily organize and manage my photos.
Ron

For NOT it works if you do the following:
1. Select keyword (e.g foo) to find photos with just that keyword
2. Ctrl + A to select all
3. Go to All Photogrpahs in the Library (selection will be maintained)
4. Go to Edit -> Invert Selection
This should leave you with all photos without 'foo'.
Works for me (Windows XP).
Andy.

Custom search for Catalog based on UDF fields combination

Can we customize in OIM 11g R2 PS1 to search catalog items based on multiple fields (similar to User search scenarios). If someone has to search based on combination of 2-3 custom attributes e.g. UDF fields , is it possible ? do we need to do complex changes in code through Catalog APIs ?
Edited by: Shashi kiran on May 15, 2013 9:45 AM
Edited by: Shashi kiran on May 15, 2013 9:49 AM

In my scenario , i have to customize catalog search with combination of 2-3 attributes including UDF attributes with standard attributes (Application Instance, Role and Entitlement). As, these 3 attributes (Application Instance, Role and Entitlement) are by default out of box ,present for catalog search we can use their combination for catalog search.
But, what if along with these standard attributes ,if there are other custom attribute like UDFs (e.g. : Sub application,Domain,etc) in combination ?
Is this customization for catalog search is possible through UI or do we have to make changes in Source Code exposing catalog APIs to work this scenario out ?
Edited by: Shashi kiran on May 16, 2013 12:06 PM

SharePoint 2010 list view - How to filter on a multiline text box field - the view filter does not allow me to select it.

Hi there,
Does someone know in SharePoint 2010 list view - How to filter on a multiline text box field - the view filter does not allow me to select it.
Thanks,

Hi，
Per my knowledge,
it is by design that the data type multiple lines of text can only use “contains” and “begins with” operators.
You can also filter the list view using SharePoint Designer,
Open your list AllItem.aspx page in SPD ->click “Filter” > in “Field Name” select your multipe line of text field, in “Comparison” will displayed four choices.
Best Regards，
Lisa Chen
TechNet Community Support
Please remember to mark the replies as answers if they help, and unmark the answers if they provide no help. If you have feedback for TechNet Support, contact
[email protected]

List View (filter) based on multiple fields

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for