LMS 3.2 Installation - Solaris 10/09 Patch Conflict:

Hello all,
We are running Sun Solaris 10/09,working on installing LMS 3.2.As per documentation,attempted to install the two recommended patches,127127-11 and 122032-05.
The 127127-11 patch is already contained in this OS packaging.The second recommended patch - 122032-05 - does not install since there exists another patch - 141518-11 - that makes the second recommended patch(122032-05) obsolete.
The 141518-11 patch cannot be uninstalled since there is no backout data for it.
What do you recommend I do to solve this issue as I cannot move ahead with the installation as things stand.
Should I use an older release of Solaris 10 that is still downloadable from the Sun Website?If so,can anyone recommend a tried and tested release I can use.
Many thanks,
W.

Hi all,
Just resifted through the documentation and they have stated the supported releases:
"The following Solaris 10 releases are supported in LMS 3.2:
–Solaris 10, 05/09 release
–Solaris 10, 10/08 release
–Solaris 10, 05/08 release
–Solaris 10, 08/07 release
–Solaris 10, 11/06 release"
Will give the installation a shot with 10/08.
Regards,
W.

Similar Messages

Prime LMS 4.2 installation with solaris 10 volume manager

Hello
Is it possible to use Solaris Volume Manager for disk mirroring in prime LMS 4.2 installation over sparc arquitecture?
This is intended for having hard disk redundancy support.
Is there any documented reference?
O.S. Solaris 10 08/11
Cisco prime LMS 4.2
Regards

They were not tested together, and I recommend they not be installed on the same zone instance (due to potential conflicts). Now, if you're certain you have a server that can accommodate both suites (in terms of resources), create separate zones for each suite. This will eliminate the conflict possibility while still giving you one overall physical machine to manage.

Solaris 8 linker patch 109147-21 / 109148-21 breaks runtime linker

The "Sun ONE Studio 8, Compiler Collection Early Access" release requires the
installation of a linker patch (109147-21 sparc / 109148-21 x86).
It seems that the solaris 8 linker patch breaks the runtime linker audit feature
for multithreaded applications.
I can reproduce the problem like this (using $LD_PROFILE, which makes
use of the runtime linker audit feature):
% cat thr.c
#define _REENTRANT
#include <stdio.h>
#include <stdlib.h>
#include <pthread.h>
void*
thr_main(void*arg)
printf("hello, world!\n");
int
main(int argc, char **argv)
pthread_t tid;
void *rval;
pthread_create(&tid, NULL, thr_main, NULL);
pthread_join(tid, &rval);
exit(0);
% cc -o thr thr.c -lpthread
% thr
hello, world!
OK, fine so far...
Now we try to run the application under rtld audit control:
% env LD_PROFILE=libc.so.1 thr
< the multithreaded application hangs >
% env LD_PROFILE=libc.so.1 LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/usr/lib/lwp thr
< the multithreaded application hangs >
(on a S8 system with 109148-14 installed, this works without hanging!!)
A "pstack `pgrep thr`" command shows multiple LWPs, all blocked
waiting in an lwp_mutex_lock() call, all trying to lock the same
mutex - which happens to be the dynamic linker's global 'rtldlock'.
% pstack `pgrep thr`
7631: thr
----------------- lwp# 1 --------------------------------
dfbd6b5f lwp_mutex_lock (dfbf1618)
dfbd69f6 lwpmutex_lock (dfbf1618) + 2a
dfbc8739 rt_mutex_lock (dfbf1618) + 19
dfbcd575 enter () + 29
dfbd2193 elf_bndr (dfa94eac, 50) + 23
dfbc3339 elf_rtbndr () + 5
----------------- lwp# 2 / thread# 2 --------------------
dfbd6b5f lwp_mutex_lock (dfbf1618)
dfbd69f6 lwpmutex_lock (dfbf1618) + 2a
dfbc8739 rt_mutex_lock (dfbf1618) + 19
dfbcd575 enter () + 29
dfbd2193 elf_bndr (dfa94eac, 238) + 23
dfbc3339 elf_rtbndr () + 5
----------------- lwp# 3 --------------------------------
dfbd6b5f lwp_mutex_lock (dfbf1618)
dfbd69f6 lwpmutex_lock (dfbf1618) + 2a
dfbc8739 rt_mutex_lock (dfbf1618) + 19
dfbcd575 enter () + 29
dfbd4257 auditpltenter () + bb
dfbd431a audit_pltenter (dfa94eac, dfa60414, df92131c, 48, df8a4cd0, df921318) + 7a
dfbc32a2 elf_plt_trace (3, ffffffff, df8a4d44) + 52
df8f435e scsetup (ffffffff, 1) + 7a
df8ea13e lwpstart () + 22
-------------------------- thread# 1 --------------------
df8e961b _swtch   (0) + 3b3
df8eb806 _dopreempt (0) + ea
df8ed247 _sigon   () + 37
df8f41d0 bindclear (1) + 48
dfbc8799 rt_bind_clear (1) + 19
dfbcd87c leave (dfbef0f4) + e8
dfbca8f7 call_init (df8d0288, 1) + 10f
dfbca339 setup (80470fc, 80471e4, 0, 8047ff2, 1000, dfbc17af, dfbf06e4, dfbc0000, ...) + cd5
dfbd3393 _setup   () + 2f7
dfbc323a rtboot () + 58
0804725c ???????? ()
-------------------------- thread# 3 --------------------
df8e7958 threadstart ()
% dbx - `pgrep thr`
Reading -
Reading ld.so.1
Reading libpthread.so.1
Reading libc.so.1
Reading libdl.so.1
Reading libthread.so.1
Reading ldprof.so.1
Reading libmapmalloc.so.1
detected a multithreaded program
Attached to process 7631 with 3 LWPs
t@3 (l@null) stopped in threadstart at 0xdf8e7958
0xdf8e7958: threadstart : call threadstart+0x5 <0xdf8e795d>
(dbx) x 0xdfbf1618 /4X
dbx: warning: unknown language, 'c' assumed
0xdfbf1618: rtldlock : 0x00000000 0x00000000 0x00000000 0x01010000
(dbx) q
detaching from process 7631
Is this a known bug?
Are there patches to fix this issue?

I think this is bugid 4804328.
Synopsis: auditing of threaded applications results in deadlock
It doesn't look like the next patch is avilable
yet, but the bug seems to be on track for being
fixed in patchid 109147-22 (the next rev of the
patch you mention. There should be new patches
for Solaris 8 sparc/intel and Solaris 9 sparc/intel.

Solaris 10 kernel Patch 127127-11

we need to apply solaris 10 kernel Patch 127127-11 in our prod server as a prerequisite for oracle10g patch set 10.2.0.4 installation
but i found a Doc 242366 (May Cause a system Panic from ip_wput_ioctl()).It is mentioned in doc that Binary relief is available through normal
support channels.Is that Binary complete fix of this problem?If yes, then i need that binary please give me the link where i can download the binary,
If not, then what is the solution of this problem.?
Thanks

These kinds of binary hotfixes/IDR's are only available through sun support to contract customers.
If your concerned, I suggest you raise a support case.
That being said, 127127-11 is kinda old. So I would be surprised if the bug hadnt been fixed by now.
Its been replaced by either 137111 or 137137.
Ive upgraded at least a dozen systems past that level and never seen a problem.
So it can't be too common..

Performace problem in oracle DB after Solaris 10 recommended patching

Dear All,
We are facing some performance problems in our oracle DB qerries and reports recently. We applied Solaris 10 recommended patchset on april 24th. Our monthly report generation acitivity is now running for last 3 days i.e may 11,12,13 and application team is complaining of degraded performance. I can see that the cpu usage on the server is about 100% during the report generation , but everything else is fine. Free memory is 15gb , all mountpoints are under 80% and there is no other hardware issue as well.
Now app team is suspecting that last month patching could be the cause of the problem, because till last month they were performing this activity without having a performance degradtion.
I just need to be sure that solaris 10 recommended patches are not causing this issue. Any of you ever faced such an issue after patch installation ?
The server is V490 with 8 cpu / 32gb RAM. Any hints will be appreciated ?
Thanks in Advance.
Edited by: 1005720 on May 13, 2013 9:58 PM

I did not archive the o/p of prstat but have o/p of top with me
195 processes: 175 sleeping, 13 running, 1 zombie, 6 on cpu
CPU states: 0.0% idle, 78.4% user, 21.6% kernel, 0.0% iowait, 0.0% swap
Memory: 32G phys mem, 16G free mem, 70G total swap, 70G free swap
PID USERNAME LWP PRI NICE SIZE RES STATE TIME CPU COMMAND
18964 oracle 39 41 0 6389M 5488M cpu/1 2:50 15.04% oracle
19638 oracle 26 59 0 6390M 5490M run 0:27 8.58% oracle
19648 oracle 36 31 0 6418M 5516M run 0:21 5.92% oracle
19023 oracle 34 30 0 6398M 5498M run 0:37 5.88% oracle
7229 oracle 38 30 0 6427M 5514M run 234:24 5.69% oracle
6912 oracle 45 31 0 6395M 5483M cpu/16 218:04 5.31% oracle
7216 oracle 28 31 0 6430M 5517M run 232:40 5.04% oracle
19644 oracle 35 40 0 6390M 5490M cpu/17 0:24 4.74% oracle
6897 oracle 112 30 0 6392M 5479M run 236:38 4.52% oracle
3813 oracle 106 31 0 6428M 5528M run 100:11 4.43% oracle
18970 oracle 234 31 0 6398M 5499M cpu/0 1:45 4.15% oracle
19749 oracle 1 32 0 6386M 5486M run 0:00 4.05% oracle
19646 oracle 23 31 0 6405M 5505M run 0:25 3.61% oracle
18972 oracle 11 32 0 6398M 5497M run 2:18 3.61% oracle
7220 oracle 258 32 0 6468M 5555M cpu/3 113:13 3.56% oracle
During the entire issue there was no %iowait.

Unable to install Solaris 8 OE patches

I'm trying to install the Solaris 8 recommended patch cluster on my new Blade 150. I downloaded and unzipped the patch file, dropped into single user mode, and executed the install_cluster script.
After asking me if I was ready to continue to install (I pressed "y"), a message appeared that it was checked for available disk space, followed by the system prompt-- the script had terminated.
Looking at the raw script file I can see that it should have either told me there was insufficient space (don't think this is a problem) or continued. Instead all it does it silently quit. I'm stuck!

are there enough space on your system
df -kl output

Solaris 2.6 Patch cluster

Is there anyone out there knows where I can get the last Solaris 2.6 patch cluster? I know it's de-supported now but sadly some legacy applications are still out there and need to run on old software/hardware.
Many thanks in advance,
Jonathan

if you run a pstack against the core, I might
recognize the failure. Usually, logging is of no
use, as we don't log a crash. . .Thanks. I'll do that. It just generated a new core file.
>
I don't know of any problems with installing 4.15p7,
nor of installing later hotfixes on top of it, and
I've been supporting Messaging Server since 4.0 came
out. . . .
If you've had file permission issues since 4.05,
that's truly news to me, unless it was that pesky
problem with Admin Server, where it would change the
permissions of the logs when it went to roll them
over. I don't remember when we fixed that one, but
we did..We've had file permission issues with the patches since 4.0. When we'd upgrade some of the files would be owned by root and not exec'able by nobody. Some of the patches would fail when the patch process would try to bind to the directory (I don't know why). We've used NMS since the 3.x version. It has also been a long time since we tried to patch to app because our experience was bad. It was stable for a long time (once we disabled shared folders and resolved the nscd issue).

LMS 3.1 on Solaris 10 - Reset all databases to initial state

Hi,
Is there a script that would clear all databases for LMS 3.1 on Solaris 10?
I imported do CS some devices from a CSV file I exported from an old LMS 2.5 server we had. I get some very strange results when I ask to sync archive for instance. The devices I manually added work fine, but the ones I imported get stuck and the job takes forever to finish (10 hours in some instances, for 230 devices).
I'd like to re-start from scratch without having to uninstall and reinstall LMS.
Thanks,
Jose Ribeiro
MGS

See this DOC for the commands to reinitialize all databases.

Some steps for configuring Network are skipped in installation Solaris 10

Hi everybody !!!
I'm a newbie in Solaris 10. I had some problems in installation Solaris 10:
I downloaded installation packet for x64/x86 (DVD) on site Sun.I want to install Solaris 10 on my PC AMD 2500+.I connect to internet through a LAN.
1)In process installation, some steps for configuring Network ( from 5 to 15 in Solaris 10 installation guide) were skipped automatically. It has been directly moved to 16-th step(setup Time and region). Then i tried to finish installing it. But in working with it, i recognized that Network card had been not found( i use NVIDIA nForce MCP Networking Adapter). I typed some command in console shell :
$netstat -in
loo...........
and received only one row like above.
i have tried some times , but not succeeded
2)Port USB is also not working
Please help me. Thanks a lot !!!

hi Vantuan,
guess I just posted reply to your other post...
also check Sun hardware compatibility list for your network card here:
http://www.sun.com/bigadmin/hcl/data/sol/components/views/networking_all_results.page1.html
- Jags Desai

Solaris 8 Security patches after 03/2009?

Hi,
I need to know if Security patches will continue to be developped after EOL of Solaris 8 on 03/2009.
Thanks

Ok,
You will need a Solaris 8 Vintage Patch Service Contract.
http://www.sun.com/service/eosl/solaris/solaris8eosl.pdf

Can someone share Solaris 10 x86 patch 145028-01?

Hi All,
My sunsolve account does not have priviledge to download Solaris 10 x86 patch 145028-01. Can someone download and share this patch with me?
Regards,
SD

So let's see ...
You want me to spend money in sufficient amounts to have a service sontract that gives me access to patch downloads.
... but you then want it for free?
No!

Where to download the latest Solaris 9 OS Patch

Hi,
can someone please direct me to the latest Solaris 9 OS patch. I could only find 117*** on sunsolve. Did I miss it?
I currently have 118558-06. Please direct me.
thanks,
[email protected]

Also, if you have login access to Sunsolve,
please review the details inside Spectrum Infodoc 76028.
"Why are there multiple kernel patches for the Solaris[TM] 8, 9 and 10 Operating Systems?"
Essentially it says that as each kernel patch became large,
it was supplanted by a new patch with a new number.
When that became large, in turn, another new patch was created.
The best way to get your Operating Environment patched is to use
the full Recommended Patch Cluster. It has everything and
patches will get installed as you system might need them.

Where to find previous Solaris 9 Recommend patch ?

Hi:
Is it possible to find the specific version of sun Solaris 9 Recommend patch? As I know, sun keep on upgrade the it on the WEB site. But I need to find out some old version.
Thanks.

I believe older patches are not deleted from the web site, so you can download any revision of the patch you need. Check out http://sunsolve.sun.com/pub-cgi/show.pl?target=patchpage

R12.1.3 PSU patching conflict question

12.1.3 running on RH Linux 5.8 and trying to apply PSU patch 17540582 on my 11.2 OH which is currently at 11.2.0.3.5.
17540582->opatch prereq CheckConflictAgainstOHWithDetail -ph ./
Oracle Interim Patch Installer version 11.2.0.3.6
Copyright (c) 2013, Oracle Corporation. All rights reserved.
PREREQ session
Oracle Home : /app/oracle/ebspatch/db/tech_st/11.2.0
Central Inventory : /app/oracle/ebspatch/db/tech_st/11.2.0/admin/oui/EBSPATCH_db6t/oraInventory
from : /app/oracle/ebspatch/db/tech_st/11.2.0/oraInst.loc
OPatch version : 11.2.0.3.6
OUI version : 11.2.0.3.0
Log file location : /app/oracle/ebspatch/db/tech_st/11.2.0/cfgtoollogs/opatch/opatch2014-01-29_11-59-16AM_1.log
Invoking prereq "checkconflictagainstohwithdetail"
ZOP-40: The patch(es) has conflicts with other patches installed in the Oracle Home (or) among themselves.
Prereq "checkConflictAgainstOHWithDetail" failed.
Summary of Conflict Analysis:
There are no patches that can be applied now.
Following patches have conflicts. Please contact Oracle Support and get the merged patch of the patches :
13004894, 17540582, 12942119
Following patches will be rolled back from Oracle Home on application of the patches in the given list :
13004894, 12942119
Conflicts/Supersets for each patch are:
Patch : 17540582
Conflict with 13004894
Conflict details:
/app/oracle/ebspatch/db/tech_st/11.2.0/lib/libserver11.a:/qke.o
Conflict with 12942119
Conflict details:
/app/oracle/ebspatch/db/tech_st/11.2.0/lib/libserver11.a:/qksbg.o
OPatch succeeded.
So I've done some reading but still not sure what to do here. Do I:
- download newer patches 13004894 and 12942119 that are available for 11.2.0.3.9?
- roll back 13004894 and 12942119
- install 11.2.0.3.9 PSU 17540582
- apply newer patches 13004894 and 12942119?

Patch 13004894 and Patch 12942119 are NOT included in Patch 17540582 so what you need to do is:
- Rollback Patch 13004894 and Patch 12942119
- Apply Patch 17540582
- Apply Patch 13004894 and Patch 12942119 (11.2.0.3.9)
Patch Set Updates for 11.2.0.3 - One-off Patch Conflict Resolution (Doc ID 1592104.1)
Thanks,
Hussein
The above two patch are NOT included in the PSU Patch so they should be applied after applying the PSU

How to detect potential CPU patch conflict in advance.

Hi,
Is there any way to report the CPU patch conflicts before applying the patch.
I found this syntax: opatch apply -silent -no_bug_superset -report in http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/topics/security/cpu-whitepaper-129885.pdf
However it doesn't work.
I downloaded the patch and unzipped the same:
$cd 10249540
$ls
10013975 10014015 10325885 7155250 7155253 7375611 7609057 8568395 8568402 8836667 8836677 8836683 9173244 9442331 9678695 patchmd.xml
10014009 10249540 7155248 7155251 7155254 7375613 8309592 8568397 8568404 8836671 8836678 8836684 9173253 9442339 9678697 README.html
10014012 10325878 7155249 7155252 7197583 7375617 8309632 8568398 8568405 8836675 8836681 8836686 9442328 9678690 cpu_root.sh
Thank you,

CPU Jan2011 DB Patch - 10249540
Oracle Database 10g Enterprise Edition Release 10.2.0.4.0 - 64bi
I tried again with no luck
files/directories not at CPU patch level .. however for interim patches or the patches within the CPU itself those files directories exists .. i.e I changed the directory to one of the patches inside this CPU
[AMD64] ordctec7@auhodctec01 > cd 10249540
[AMD64] ordctec7@auhodctec01 > ls
10013975 10014015 10325885 7155250 7155253 7375611 7609057 8568395 8568402 8836667 8836677 8836683 9173244 9442331 9678695 patchmd.xml
10014009 10249540 7155248 7155251 7155254 7375613 8309592 8568397 8568404 8836671 8836678 8836684 9173253 9442339 9678697 README.html
10014012 10325878 7155249 7155252 7197583 7375617 8309632 8568398 8568405 8836675 8836681 8836686 9442328 9678690 cpu_root.sh
$ cd 8568405
$ ls
etc files
$ opatch apply -silent -no_bug_superset -report
Invoking OPatch 10.2.0.4.2
Oracle Interim Patch Installer version 10.2.0.4.2
Copyright (c) 2007, Oracle Corporation. All rights reserved.
Oracle Home : /dctec7/oracle/product/102
Central Inventory : /dctec7/oracle/oraInventory
from : /etc/oraInst.loc
OPatch version : 10.2.0.4.2
OUI version : 10.2.0.4.0
OUI location : /dctec7/oracle/product/102/oui
Log file location : /dctec7/oracle/product/102/cfgtoollogs/opatch/opatch2011-04-09_09-37-14AM.log
ApplySession applying interim patch '8568405' to OH '/dctec7/oracle/product/102'
Running prerequisite checks...
OPatch will patch the local system only because it detected the Oracle Home has only one associated node in the inventory. To patch additional nodes, exit this session, update the inventory by running 'runInstaller(Unix) or setup(Windows) -updateNodeList...'
Please shutdown Oracle instances running out of this ORACLE_HOME on the local system.
(Oracle Home = '/dctec7/oracle/product/102')
Is the local system ready for patching? y
Y (auto-answered by -silent)
User Responded with: Y
Backing up files and inventory (not for auto-rollback) for the Oracle Home
Users request no RAC file generation. Do not create MP files.
Skip patching component oracle.rdbms, 10.2.0.4.0 and its actions.
The actions are reported here, but are not performed.
Updating archive file "/dctec7/oracle/product/102/lib/libserver10.a" with "lib/libserver10.a/kpolon.o"
Running make for target ioracle
ApplySession skipping inventory update.
Verifying the update...
Inventory and System verification is performed here.
The local system has been patched and can be restarted.
OPatch succeeded.
Thanks,

LMS 3.2 Installation - Solaris 10/09 Patch Conflict:

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for