LMS License error only with DFM

We are getting a license error only with DFM; we already checked the license file and its showing the DFM(2.0) license is for ever. Tried rebooting the server and restarting the DFM service/Mgr daemon.
Anybody has any idea why this is happening?

DFM license popup was a pre-LMS3.0 feature used by Cisco to validate "proof of purchase" of earlier product for customers who obtained an upgrade version of the newer software (LMS 2.5/2.6).
If your original purchase was an upgrade from a previous product then you must also run the dfmValidateUpgrade.bat file located in NMSROOT\bin directory , you will need to locate the previous DFM cd and place it in the CDROM drive.
There is also a validateupgrade executable for the RME package which requires similar validation.
It may be possible you upgraded from a product that did not support DFM, in which case you do not have the CD and as such are not entitled through the upgrade license for that product.
Additionaly, here are steps to reapply your license:
Try this procedure for installing the license file.
Be sure you have the license files from www.cisco.com/go/license using your PAK number it will generate an email with the files needed.
Open a DOS shell and issue the command:
> \progra~1\CSCOpx\bin\pdterm LicenseServer
validate with
> \progra~1\CSCOpx\bin\pdshow
Go to \progra~1\CSCOpx\etc\license
NOTE: You may want to back these files up before proceeding (copy *.lic to \temp or some other directory)
Delete all *.lic files (NOTE: QPM/LMS/CUOM***.lic file should not be copied to this directory directly. If it is there, move it to some other directory)
Back to the dos shell and issue the command:
> \progra~1\CSCOpx\bin\pdexec LicenseServer
Update the QPM/LMS/CUOM**.lic file from the GUI from
CS -> Server -> Admin -> Licensing
(The LMS**.lic should be in some other directory other than
\progra~1\CSCOpx\bin\etc\licenses and must have read permission for casuser)
Close all the browser sessions and open a new browser and launch the CiscoWorks and check for the popup message.
Also notice LMS 2.6 and earlier products are no longer supported by the TAC.
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/partner/prod/collateral/netmgtsw/ps6504/ps6528/ps2425/prod_end-of-life_notice0900aecd80532c07.html

Similar Messages

LMS license error

Hi,
We started having a weird license error with an old LMS which was working fine. Can you offer any idea on what to check, how to fix this?
Thanks

post the output of pdshow

"Communication Error" only with certain friends with VideoChat

My video chat works with most of my buddies on iChat but with certain people it always fails. we both receive a "communication error" whenever we try to connect with each other. help please!

Hi All,
On my MacBook Pro which runs 10.6.4 I have iChat > Preferences > Video Section > Bandwidth Limit set to 500kbps
This is because iChat 5 "Sees" and uses the Internet connection differently from earlier versions.
On Leopard and earlier go to System Preferences > Quicktime > Streaming and set the drop down to 1.5Mbps (T1/Intranet/LAN)
iChat will need to be restarted to "see" the new speed.
This will make sure iChat sees and uses as much of your Internet Connection as is possible.
The Automatic setting Limits iChat to only 384kbps in Leopard and is read as 0 in earlier versions. The Intranet /LAN setting is also suspect in iChat 3 (Tiger)
iChat 5 and Snow Leopard does not have this setting.
iChat then sees and tries to use the full speed of your Internet Connection.
The Upload speed is then the limiting factor.
This speed may then be several times faster than a Leopard Buddy even if they have set 1.5mbps in Quicktime.
Connection-wise iChat 5 has stepped up to modern connection speeds.
At the iChat 5 end the only Limit you can place on it now is the aforementioned Bandwidth Limit.
Start with all Buddies on 500kbps (having done the Quicktime thing on the Leopard Buddies).
Even if some buddies do not have 500kbps as an upload it will bring everybody into a smaller window connection speed-wise and iChat is more likely to be successful.
Also check the Snow Leopard Firewall Settings
System Preferences > Security > Firewall
If On then check the Advanced Button is allowing Signed apps and that iChat is in the List.
9:16 PM Monday; June 21, 2010
Please, if posting Logs, do not post any Log info after the line "Binary Images for iChat"

Oracle 11g and PRO*C : pre-compile errors only with 11g !

Hi !
I didn't find a forum specific to pro*c, so here i am.
I've downloaded Oracle 11g and recompiled our applications using pro*c
We currently precompiling without any problem our sources against Oracle 7, 8, 9, 10.
With Oracle 11g, it doesn't work !
every EXEC SQL followed by a command works.
every EXEC SQL followed by a query generates the same error.
Example :
char *oracle_date_courante()
     static char buf[SIZE_ORADATE+1];
     EXEC SQL SELECT sysdate into :buf from DUAL;
     if(ORA_SQLERROR())
          oracle_error("sélection date courante");
          buf[0]=0;
     return buf;
PRO*C output :
Erreur Ó la ligne 105, colonne 2 dans le fichier src\oracle.pc
EXEC SQL
.1
PLS-S-00000, SQL Statement ignored
erreur sÚmantique Ó la ligne 105, colonne 2, fichier src\oracle.pc:
EXEC SQL
.1
PCC-S-02346, PL/SQL a trouvÚ des erreurs sÚmantiques
So, we investigated... And found that thoses errors come when we use the option sqlcheck=semantics.
If we use an inferiour check level, it works but because we use PL/SQL keywords, pro*c prints errors and wants us to provide the 'semantics' sqlcheck level !
So, it's a vicious circle !
Any ideas ?
Thanks...
Vincent

Adding the option common_parser=yes removes the errors !
But brings errors linked to the PL/SQL parser such like
CSF-S-00000, ORA-06544: PL/SQL : erreur interne, arguments : [55916], [], [], []
1>, [], [], [], []
1>ORA-06553: PLS-801: erreur interne [55916]
Really vicious..and still not precompiling !
By the way : Server is 10.2.0.1... and i guess thoses errors are normal since the common parser is not available in this version...
So bye bye option common_parser and i'm back to my orignals errors.
Message was edited by:
Vicenzo

Getting ORA-01017: invalid username/password error only with specific tools

Hi,
I am a Junior DBA still getting familiar with Oracle. I am having trouble accessing one of my databases through both TOAD and SQLDetective tools. When I try to log in to my database using these tools, I get the error:
ORA - 01017: invalid username/password; login denied
Even though the password and username is correct.
I can successfully login through other tools like SQLTools and through SQL Plus. I have searched this issue and I have seen people with the same problems but I couldnt find a solution. The weird thing is, I can use TOAD and SQLDetective to login to other databases without any issues. It seems to be this one specific database.
My database is an 11g database on a linux box. I have 9i and 10g clients installed on my machine. The all my apps use the tnsnames from the 9i home on my machine.
Any help on this would be greatly appreciated. Thanks.
Rgs,
Rob
Edited by: rgilligan on 16-Apr-2010 02:11

Hello, if it is 11g, look at the parameter sec_case_sensitive_logon. This parameter defaults to true, which makes the password case sensitive. Some tools/apps do a UPPER or LOWER on the password and so this may the reason for the error
Henner

EXC_BAD_ACCESS (SIGBUS) error ONLY with Word and Excel

Whenever I try to launch Microsoft Word or Excel either from the Dock or from the applications folder, the programs fail to launch and I get this in the report: EXCBADACCESS (SIGBUS).
What's odd is that both programs will start if I double click an existing Word or Excel document.
I just cannot start the programs manually from the Dock or the App folder.
This problem started after I installed a Quicktime package called Perian, and the problem persists even after removing the package.
I'd appreciate any help in solving this problem.

Did you find out anything regarding the EXCBADACCESS? I'm running into the same problem. I cannot restart any of my Word apps. I can open existing Word & Excel documents. Please let me know. I'm desperate. I've also reinstalled my Word application. Thanks.

Licensing Error 213:11

I downloaded a trial version of Photoshop Elements 11 and when I start the program, upon clicking the 'Photo editor' button, I get a licensing error message with number 213:11. When I click the 'Organizer' button, the program closes. I have a very old computer so this may be the problem, but if anyone can help me I would really appreciate it! Thanks.

This is likely due to the fact that the file permissions on your SLStore directory have become compromised. You can find details on how to correct this difficulty at Error "License store does not allow writing" | Install log | CS5, CS5.5 - http://helpx.adobe.com/creative-suite/kb/error-store-does-not-allow.html.

HT4910 My iCal has frozen after I tried to paste info from an email into a reminder. I get a "server reports an error" message with what I tried to paste in the box. Calendar is frozen and will only close by forcing it. Any help?

My iCal has frozen after I tried to paste info from an email into a reminder. I get a "server reports an error" message with what I tried to paste in the box. Calendar is frozen and will only close by forcing it. Any help?

Did another window open with the pasted information? If so, try hitting "enter/return" key and "delete" key at the same time. That should get rid of the current action on the ical, the extra window should go bye-bye, and all should be fine with the world.

I have been trying to update via App Store and every time only with apple software it starts to download and it will says it's calculating time remaining then an error message pops up saying " An error has occurred the request timed out. (102) "

I have been trying to update via App Store and every time only with apple software it starts to download and it will says it's calculating time remaining then an error message pops up saying " An error has occurred the request timed out. (102)" I have tried everything , I've been told its my ISP but I have tried using differenet internet to attempt the updates. Like I said all other software updates fine its just apple software

http://www.apple.com/support/mac/app-store/contact.html?form=account

STO returns with EWM Error "Posting with reference to pur. order only possi

Hi Experts,
We are trying to STO returns GR (161 Movement) with transaction MIGO for a EWM managed plant.
Plant A is a EWM managed plant and Plant B is IM managed plant.
We created a stock transfer order with "B" as supplying plant for plant "A" but with "Returns" tick in the item. (Document type UB)
In the first step, when we try to post 161 movement with MIGO transaction, we are getting the below error
"Posting with reference to pur. order only possible for integrated whse"
Message no. L9510
But the same scenario works between two IM managed plants.
Can you please help me in resolving the issue
Gobinathan G

Hi All,
I am interested in the tail end of this process. I have activated DWM. We have received an Idoc confirming the Inbound Delivery for a Purchase Order Receipt.
The Goods Movement Status of the Inbound delivery has changed to C but there is only a Confirmation of Service in the document flow and the Purchase Order is not receipted.
I am unable to MIGO the PO manually.
I guess the Inbound delivery should have posted a receipt on the PO but not sure what is missing?
Any ideas?
Thanks
Lee

HT201442 I am got error while trying to restore,, but i just only error file with 3194. I try many step by install lastest version and fix host file, but still fail. Anybody can give me any key point to solve this problem? Thank you

I am got error while trying to restore,, but i just only error file with 3194. I try many step by install lastest version and fix host file, but still fail. Anybody can give me any key point to solve this problem? Thank you

Error 3194:
This device isn't eligible for the requested build
It means that Apple has stopped signing the version of iOS that you have, try downloading the latest iOS version, then try Restore again.

Error accessing the UWL only with one user

Hi,
We have a problem only with one user, when the user access the UWL get the following error:
Runtime error in the portal
Exception in processing request, send the ID of exception to your portal ADMINISTRATION
ID exception 10:54_21/10/11_0037_8766350
The other user does not have problems accessing the mailbox.
The user is assigned the role of the mailbox correctly.
Any idea what may be the problem?
Thanks and regards

Hello,
The best way to see what these issues are is to check the trace for when the run time error has occured:
Log on to the portal, recreate the runtime error. Then follow:
1596214 How to find the latest default trace from right after
reproducing an issue. Please ensure that you have reproduced the
issue with a user that is experiencing the issue that you have reported. When you find the most recent default trace file, copy and paste the numbers from the portal screen and do a ctrl + F with the trace file opened and paste in the runtime error. Now you should be able to see what is causing this issue.
Then when you get this information, please paste or attach the file here that contains the runtime error for the user. From this we should be able to figure out why the user is getting this.
Also as an admin user, try clearing this users personalizations on the Universal Worklist first.
Please clear all personalizations with the affected user and retest.
Here is the help link to show you how to clear the personalizations:
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw70/helpdata/EN/29
/441f6f09364bcab17f94490555bee4/content.htm
If clearing the personalizations does not help this user, please attach the trace file showing the runtime error.
Beth Maben
EP - Senior Support Consultant II
AGS Primary Support
Global Support Centre Ireland
Please see the UWL Wiki @
https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/scn/wiki?path=/display/bpx/uwl+faq ***

Sandbox error only when loading URL containing directory with purely numeric name.

This error only occurs under very strange circumstances. We have several clients whose domain names begin with a sequence of digits (e.g. 401blah.com). We have file paths under another server employing directory names derived from these domain names. (e.g. /4/401/...). We employ the same scheme for all domain names, so fooblah.com would utilize directory /f/fooblah/...
Our swf file is embedded in an HTML page which is served up from 401blah.com (name is an example). It attempts to load images from another server (e.g. pictures.foo.com//4/401/...). The pictures.foo.com site has a crossdomain.xml file that permits all domains to access its contents. When the swf at fooblah.com tries to load an image at pictures.foo.com//f/fooblah/... it does so without a hitch. However, when the same swf hosted in an identical page at 401blah.com attempts to access an image at pictures.foo.com//4/401/... it fails with the following error:
Error #2048: Security sandbox violation: http://401blah.com/v8/widgets/generic/image/semantic-slideshow.swf cannot load data from http:/pictures.foo.com/4/401blah/0288/2015daea4046387201f6d2e38e0c1ac6.jpg
Now, I'm using fake names for the domain here in order to obfuscate the customer, but if I substitute in the correct customer name, the URL http:/pictures.foo.com/4/401blah/0288/2015daea4046387201f6d2e38e0c1ac6.jpg does, in fact, access the correct image.
When we use non numeric directory names everything works without a hitch. When we use numeric directory names, despite all info being in its proper place and a proper crossdomain.xm, loading the images in fails.
In fact, according to our net-trace, when we use numeric directory names, pictures.foo.com (fake domain name substituted in for real domain name), flash doesn't even try to look at its crossdomain.xml file (while it does try, and succeeds at doing so, when non numeric directory names are used).
It looks like Flash is doing some kind of test on the URL and making an incorrect determination on it. Any help on this that does not involve changing our directory scheme would be appreciated. I have read all of the relevent documentation and our crossdomain.xml file is set up correctly, so please focus on the behavior visa vi strange treatment of numeric directory names in the URL.

try to write your php code with notepad.
There could be invisible characters when using Dreamweaver or similar softwares.

C++ Compiler aborts with licensing error message

SUN OS - 5.6 with CC compiler version :
>>>
Sun WorkShop 6 update 1 Compilers C++
>>>
fails after a while when trying to do a Make of few C++ files ,
the error message is :
>>>
License Error : Licensing product (Sun WorkShop Compiler C++ SPARC).
License File: /opt/SunProd/SUNWspro6.1/bin/../WS6U1/bin/../../license_dir/sunpro.lic,1
License file does not support this version
Feature:workshop.cc.sparc
Application version > License version:6.000512 > 6.000
FLEXlm error:-21,126.
>>>
In this scenario the CC is NFS mounted on my system with a remote license host.
Has anyone seen this problem ?
Sunil--
[email protected]

Version of Sun C++ prior to Sun Studio 7 (also known as Forte Developer 7) used the FlexLM license manager. To run any of the compilers or tools you need a license server with a license for for the compiler version you are using. Details are in the Release Notes and the Install Guide that came with the product.
These products are End Of Life, and little support is available for them. If you had a license but lost it, contact Sun Service to find out how to get a replacement. If you have a service contract, contact your Sun Service representative. If not, try one of these web sites:
http://sunsolve.sun.com/private-cgi/show.pl?target=home_con
http://developers.sun.com/services
Unless there is a specific reason why you need to use an obsolete compiler, you should download Sun Studio 11, which is free, and needs no license server. It's also a much better product by any measure. You can get it here:
http://developers.sun.com/sunstudio/

How to resolve error 'The DPMRA service terminated with service-specific error Only one usage of each socket address (protocol/network address/port) is normally permitted'

One of my exchange 2010 servers dpm agent is give the following error when the dpmra service attempts to start.
The DPMRA service terminated with service-specific error Only one usage of each socket address (protocol/network address/port) is normally permitted..
I have tried uninstalling/reinstalling the agent but this does not resolve the issue
Any help would be greatly appreciated.
Thanks
William Hickson

Hi
Something has probably changed on the protected server side that affects the DPM agent. In some cases the DCOM configuration could change. Look at this blogpost and verify your DPMRA DCOM object.
http://robertanddpm.blogspot.com/2010/08/dpm-ra-rights.html
If this doesn't do the trick try reinstall the agent.
Best Regards
Robert Hedblom
MVP DPM
Check out my DPM blog @ http://robertanddpm.blogspot.com

LMS License error only with DFM

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for