Lock entries for FM - 'ALM_ME_READ_CATALOG_PROFILE'

Dear Friends
Whenever the following function modules are called it create lock entries in sm12. So it restricts transaction QS41 for edit Mode.
ALM_ME_READ_CATALOG_PROFILE
QM09_READ_CATALOG_PROFILE
I want these lock entires to be deleted automatically after it is called. I tried to remove lock entires using the following function module and it never worked.
Call function 'DEQUEUE_EQQPGR2'
      exporting
        mode_qpgr = 'X'
        mandt      = sy-mandt
        katalogart = 'P'
        codegruppe = 'PTRTY'
Kindly help me.
Thanks

Hi Meghana,
I am not sure about the FM. But the CRM table COMM_PCAT_ITM contains the relation between product catalog and the product. In this table the product guids are stored in the field 'OBJECT' and corresponding product catalog guids are in the field 'PARENT_CATALOG'
Hope this helps to debug further.
Thnaks,
Paul Kondaveeti

Similar Messages

Cross system object lock -how to build up lock entries for existing request

Hello,
we implemented ChaRM for some years and intend to activate cross system object lock (CSOL), now.
But there are a lot of existing transport requests, which have not been imported to productive system, yet.
It would be very helpful to create lock entries for objects, which are assigned to those transport requests.
Does anyone know any standard report for this purpose?
Thanks a lot for any hint.
Best regards
Horst

If anyone else needs that feature:
Report TMW_TRKORR_LOCK_UPDATE (executed in satellite system) will lock the objects of a transport request in solution manager system.

Lock entries for table SWWWIHEAD in SM12 Urgent

HI
From last few days, In SM12 there are lock entries coming for workitems of table SWWWIHEAD even though workitem is completed successfully. Time of lock entry shows it is time when approver started taking action on it.
Please let me know is there any impact of this on system and how it is happening and what we should do with these lock entries.
Appreciate your help.
Regards,
Shiv.

Dear,
Actually we faced an issue related to this like the approver took action on it. after that the item got locked. the basis is telling there could be the RFC session from SAP Portal inbox which is not closed somehow. may be session is exited without properly logging out. in this case the item was still in his inbox and when the approver tries to open it, the error message says workitem is locked bye the same user id. The basis is telling the lock will be removed after the default stipulated time (in my case, its 8 Hrs ! ).
hope this helps.
with regards,
Sudhahar R.

Delete lock entry for an IDOC locked since 5 days ago.

Hello,
I received some Delivery and an IDOC numbers, I was asked to release the delivery with the VKM5 T-code, and the IDOC with the BD87, However one of them was locked by user TIDAL_SCHED.
Here's the Delivery Number:
86622718
The IDOC number:
0000001073053855
Here's the message I receive when I try to release the delivery:
86622718   CSL: VPRCLNT810:SALES_DOCUMENT:0150000010 is locked by TIDAL_SCHED (VPRCLNT810-01) (lock time: 20150430141129 , reference counter: 1 )
How can I locate this exact lock entry? Is there an specific table I should look for besides the user name? So far I have obtained the following information:
Sales Order: 3000011472
Return: 0150000010
Delivery: 0086622718
As you can see the look time is April 30th 2015; whenever I look into everything TIDAL_SCHED I don't get anything referencing the Delivery and/or Sales doc or april 30th:
810
TIDAL_SCHED
18:05:07
S
ZVSPGMUSG
810ZTIAP_TWS_PAYMENT_UPDATES               TIDAL_SCHED
0
1
810
TIDAL_SCHED
18:14:40
E
CSL_MTLK
VPRCLNT81001VPRCLNT810:SALES_DOCUMENT:7677216031
0
1
810
TIDAL_SCHED
18:14:40
E
EDIDC
8100000001073152622
1
1
810
TIDAL_SCHED
18:14:40
S
EM07M
810XSAMN910TBLK      DC150001MARDDC15                           L01 H            1.000              0.00
0
1
810
TIDAL_SCHED
18:14:40
E
EM07W
810XSAMN910TBLK      DC15                                          0.000              0.00              0.00              0.00
0
1
810
TIDAL_SCHED
18:14:40
E
LIKP
8108676864448
0
1
810
TIDAL_SCHED
18:14:40
S
MARC
810XSAMN910TBLK      DC15
0
2
810
TIDAL_SCHED
18:14:40
S
MBEW
810XSAMN910TBLK      DC15##########
0
3
810
TIDAL_SCHED
18:14:40
E
VBAK
8107677216031
0
1
810
TIDAL_SCHED
18:14:40
S
ATPENQ
810810000000610214635259DC30          DC30            20150504                                              2           1.000
0
1
810
TIDAL_SCHED
18:14:40
E
EDIDC
8100000001073169350
0
2
810
TIDAL_SCHED
18:14:40
S
EM07M
810000000610214635259DC300001MARDDC30                           L01 H            1.000              0.00
0
1
810
TIDAL_SCHED
18:14:40
S
EM07W
810000000610214635259DC30                           10             1.000-           130.23-           130.00-             0.00
0
1
810
TIDAL_SCHED
18:14:40
S
MARC
810000000610214635259DC30
0
2
810
TIDAL_SCHED
18:14:40
S
MBEW
810000000610214635259DC30##########
0
3
810
TIDAL_SCHED
18:14:41
E
CSL_MTLK
VPRCLNT81001VPRCLNT810:SALES_DOCUMENT:7677211659
0
1
810
TIDAL_SCHED
18:14:41
E
EDIDC
8100000001073147516
1
1
810
TIDAL_SCHED
18:14:41
E
LIKP
8108676859884
0
1
810
TIDAL_SCHED
18:14:41
E
VBAK
8107677211659
0
1
810
TIDAL_SCHED
18:14:41
E
EDIDC
8100000001073169349
1
1
810
TIDAL_SCHED
18:14:41
E
EM07W
810000000610214694102DC30                                          0.000              0.00              0.00              0.00
0
1
810
TIDAL_SCHED
18:14:41
S
MARC
810000000610214694102DC30
0
1
810
TIDAL_SCHED
18:14:41
S
MBEW
810000000610214694102DC30##########
0
2

For what it's worth, you posted this in 2011, and here in 2014 I am still having this same issue. Over the last two days, I have had to unlock my apple account 8 times. I didn't get any new devices. I haven't initiated a password reset. I didn't forget my password. I set up two factor authentication and have been able to do the unlocking with the key and using a code sent to one of my devices.
That all works.
It's this having to unlock my account every time I go to use any of my devices. And I have many: iMac, iPad, iPad2, iPad mini, iPhone 5s, iPod touch (daughter), and my old iPhone 4 being used as an ipod touch now. They are all synced, and all was working just fine.
I have initiated an incident with Apple (again) but I know they are just going to suggest I change my Apple ID. It's a simple one, and one that I am sure others think is theirs. I don't want to change it. I shouldn't have to. Apple should be able to tell me who is trying to use it, or at least from where.
Thanks for listening,
Melissa

No Lock entries for structure Lock in project

Hi
I had uploaded the blueprint first time with wrong logical components from standard excel template from SOLAR_PROJECT_ADMIN. Second time, I am trying to upload with correct logical components. but its end up in the below error.
The batch job is ending with below error when uploading using the standard template from SOLAR_PROJECT_ADMIN .
Please help
thanks
Sol Man

Hello Novice,
Please check following note 1973194 - Not able to upload project structure from solar_project_admin
BR,
K.

Other solution for locked entries in smq2

Hello everyone. Good day!
I have two entries in smq2 that are not moving. However, the status text indicates that they are running. 2 hours has elapsed since the entries started not to move. I have tried unlocking the queues and resetting the message causing the block. After resetting the message, the status text became Object Requested is Currently Locked by User. Thus, I deleted the locked entry in sm12. After deleting, I reset the entries again, then the status was changed to running but the entries are still not moving.
It seems that the steps I performed above do not work. So, my next step is to look at sm37 if there is a failing job. But I found none. I also checked sm59 to see if there is a connection problem with our Java server. But the connection is fine.
Do you have other ideas on how to solve this?
Thanks in advance!

Me too not sure, how to check in SMQ2.:-(
We ca do this in SXMB_MONI. Here you will find your msg with green flag.
Here there will be a column for queue name. If you click on this it will take you to the screenyou see from SMQ2. In SXMB_MONI, there will be a column which says PE/AE. If it is PE then the msg corresponds to a BPM. Click on PE to know about the steps completed in the BPM.
Regards,
Jai Shankar

Lock: Can't get shadow database entry for root

Hi all--
posting this here since I'm having trouble with a Solaris release version and not OpenSolaris. Plus, Rich makes it pretty clear not to bug him with questions about this program! :-D
Anyway I've been using Rich Teer's lock program on Solaris 10 (and 9) and it's been great. http://www.rite-group.com/rich/sw/lock.html
But now that I've built a new machine with the latest general Solaris 10 x86 release (Solaris 10 8/07 s10x_u4wos_12b X86) the portion of lock that gets info from the shadow file doesn't seem to work:
if I enter the incorrect password (to either lock or lock -p) I get:
lock: Can't get shadow database entry for root: Error 0
Rich discusses the background on his lock program in this article:
http://developers.sun.com/solaris/articles/program_privileges.html
...but it's over my head.
Anyone have some guidance on this? I'd really like to use this program in my work environment. thanks! ..and happy Thanksgiving!
-Matt

Futher information on this problem OS is Windows XP PRO SP2
Jer, I have tried stopping and stating the database many times to no avail. I even stop the listener first before trying a restart, see below
I need some one to tell me what or where to look next Are there log files could I have some sort of trace report that might tell me more etc...?
M:\oraclexe\app\oracle\product\10.2.0\server\BIN>net start OracleXETNSListener
The requested service has already been started.
More help is available by typing NET HELPMSG 2182.
M:\oraclexe\app\oracle\product\10.2.0\server\BIN>net start OracleServiceXE
The OracleServiceXE service is starting........................................
The OracleServiceXE service was started successfully.
M:\oraclexe\app\oracle\product\10.2.0\server\BIN>netstat -a
Active Connections
Proto Local Address Foreign Address State
TCP HPPavillonXP:135 HPPavillonXP:0 LISTENING
TCP HPPavillonXP:445 HPPavillonXP:0 LISTENING
TCP HPPavillonXP:1521 HPPavillonXP:0 LISTENING
TCP HPPavillonXP:1981 HPPavillonXP:0 LISTENING
TCP HPPavillonXP:2869 HPPavillonXP:0 LISTENING
TCP HPPavillonXP:1025 HPPavillonXP:0 LISTENING
TCP HPPavillonXP:1045 HPPavillonXP:0 LISTENING
TCP HPPavillonXP:1048 HPPavillonXP:0 LISTENING
TCP HPPavillonXP:139 HPPavillonXP:0 LISTENING
TCP HPPavillonXP:1389 by2m6-cs99.msgr.hotmail.com:1863 ESTABLISHED
TCP HPPavillonXP:139 HPPavillonXP:0 LISTENING
UDP HPPavillonXP:445 *:*
UDP HPPavillonXP:500 *:*
UDP HPPavillonXP:1030 *:*

Want a single entry for alarms in the "AlarmsWindow"

Hi,
I have an alarm in Lookout that comes in fairly frequently. This is normal for this alarm, it comes in and out of alarm by itself. After the alarm clears itself it becomes blue (the unacknowledged color). When the alarm goes back into alarm it is displayed in the "AlarmsWindow" on a new line. So after getting this alarm eight times I will have 8 entries in my AlarmsWindow.
How can I make it so that I will only get a single entry in the AlarmsWindow per alarm?
I have tried the following paramenters in the Lookout.ini file, but they don't seem to do anything.
[Alarms]
MostRecent=1
OldAlarmsLimit=0
I edited the file in my Lookout4 directory and then restart lookout. I have also tried restarting all the the Lookout services... with no lock
Please help,
Thanks.

Thanks for the reply!...
Actually, I'd prefer not to use auto acknowledge if it can be avoided... precisely for the reason you've mentioned. (i.e. because it is a global thing...) I don't want my other alarms to auto acknowledge.
Ideally I would like there to be a way for there to be just a single entry for an alarm, where the time stamp would update whenever the alarm is active.
The problem is that my customer has a pressure gauge that they monitor for low pressure... but at certain times of the day the pressure readings will bounce around the setpoint level for the low pressure alarm. For example, if the pressure setpoint is 70 psi, then we might see a period of time where we get 100 alarms because during that time of the day the pressure fluctuates between 68 and 73 psi frequently. All these alarms flood the "AlarmsWindow" making it hard to see other valid alarms. So the customer would like to see just one alarm entry for ALL occurances of the pressure alarm.
It sounds like the .ini file entries I mentioned should do just that, but when I try it nothing different happens... is there something different I have to do to get those .ini entries to work? Has anyone had success with thise .ini entries?
please help... thanks!

Lock object for table EKES

Hi experts,
I developed a function module to update the confirmations tab of a PO on ME22N screen. Now, I want to have a lock object in the FM so that a user cant make changes while this FM is in use. I do not know if there is any standard lock object for this purpose. I created a lock object in SE11 'EZEKES' since table EKES corresponds to vendor confirmations details. The Enqueue function was called into the program. The code is below:
CALL FUNCTION 'ENQUEUE_EZPHLOCK'
EXPORTING
   MODE_EKES            = 'E'
   MANDT                = SY-MANDT
   EBELN                = ponumber
EXCEPTIONS
   FOREIGN_LOCK         = 1
   SYSTEM_FAILURE       = 2
   OTHERS               = 3
The problem is, i'm not able to have a lock on the confirmations tab when the FM is in use. Is there any problem with the lock object i have created. The lock mode is Exclusive,Cumulative.
Please help me with this.

Code:
""Local Interface:
*" IMPORTING
*"     REFERENCE(PONUMBER) TYPE EKKO-EBELN
*" TABLES
*"      ITAB STRUCTURE UEKES
TABLES: EKES, EKKO.
DATA: BEGIN OF I_EKKO OCCURS 0,
        EBELN LIKE EKKO-EBELN,
        END OF I_EKKO.
DATA: X LIKE EKES-ETENS.
data: i_tab like itab occurs 0 with header line.
move itab[] to i_tab[].
DATA: i_ekes LIKE uekes OCCURS 0 WITH HEADER LINE.
SELECT EBELN FROM EKKO INTO TABLE I_EKKO WHERE EBELN = PONUMBER.
IF NOT I_EKKO[] IS INITIAL.
    SELECT * FROM EKES INTO TABLE I_EKES
    FOR ALL ENTRIES IN I_EKKO
WHERE EBELN = I_EKKO-EBELN.
ENDIF.
select single etens from ekes into x WHERE EBELN = PONUMBER.
x = x + 1.
IF SY-SUBRC <> 0.
MESSAGE ID SY-MSGID TYPE SY-MSGTY NUMBER SY-MSGNO
        WITH SY-MSGV1 SY-MSGV2 SY-MSGV3 SY-MSGV4.
ENDIF.
DATA: VARKEY LIKE RSTABLE-VARKEY.
CALL FUNCTION 'ENQUEUE_E_TABLE'
   EXPORTING
    MODE_RSTABLE         = 'E'
     TABNAME              = EKES
     VARKEY               = VARKEY
    X_TABNAME            = ' '
    X_VARKEY             = ' '
    _SCOPE               = '2'
    _WAIT                = ' '
    _COLLECT             = ' '
EXCEPTIONS
    FOREIGN_LOCK         = 1
    SYSTEM_FAILURE       = 2
    OTHERS               = 3
IF SY-SUBRC <> 0.
MESSAGE ID SY-MSGID TYPE SY-MSGTY NUMBER SY-MSGNO
        WITH SY-MSGV1 SY-MSGV2 SY-MSGV3 SY-MSGV4.
ENDIF.
IF SY-SUBRC <> 0.
MESSAGE ID SY-MSGID TYPE SY-MSGTY NUMBER SY-MSGNO
        WITH SY-MSGV1 SY-MSGV2 SY-MSGV3 SY-MSGV4.
ENDIF.
    LOOP AT I_TAB. "WHERE EBELN = PONUMBER.
    READ TABLE I_TAB.
    LOOP AT i_ekes WHERE ebelp EQ ITAB-EBELP "itemnumber
                      AND ebtyp EQ 'LA'.
      i_ekes-menge = ITAB-MENGE. "quantity.
      i_ekes-kz   = 'U'.
      i_ekes-eindt = ITAB-EINDT. "deldate.
      I_EKES-XBLNR = ITAB-XBLNR.
      i_ekes-erdat = sy-datum.
      i_ekes-ezeit = sy-uzeit.
      MODIFY i_ekes.
    ENDLOOP.
ENDLOOP.
IF sy-subrc NE 0.
    LOOP AT I_TAB. "WHERE EBELN = PONUMBER.
      READ TABLE I_TAB.
      LOOP AT i_ekes WHERE ebelp EQ ITAB-EBELP "itemnumber
                     AND ebtyp EQ 'AB'.
        i_ekes-menge = ITAB-MENGE. "quantity.
        i_ekes-ebtyp = 'LA'.
        i_ekes-kz   = 'I'.
        i_ekes-etens   = x.
        i_ekes-eindt = ITAB-EINDT. "deldate.
        I_EKES-XBLNR = ITAB-XBLNR.
        i_ekes-erdat = sy-datum.
        i_ekes-ezeit = sy-uzeit.
        APPEND i_ekes.
      ENDLOOP.
    ENDLOOP.
ENDIF.
To update the confirmations tab
CALL FUNCTION 'ME_CONFIRMATION_UPDATE'
    EXPORTING
      I_EBELN = PONUMBER
    TABLES
      XEKES   = i_ekes[].
        YEKES         = I_EKES[].
IF SY-SUBRC = 0.
    CALL FUNCTION 'BAPI_TRANSACTION_COMMIT'.
ENDIF.
CALL FUNCTION 'DEQUEUE_E_TABLE'
EXPORTING
MODE_RSTABLE       = 'E'
   TABNAME            = EKES.
   VARKEY             = VARKEY
X_TABNAME          = ' '
X_VARKEY           = ' '
_SCOPE             = '3'
_SYNCHRON          = ' '
_COLLECT           = ' '
ENDFUNCTION.

Unalbe to delete lock entry table using Dequeue function module

Friends,
I display a base ALV list with custom app. tool bar. When i click on a button, i submit another report which updates a z-table for that corresponding row. I create a lock object for this entry before submitting the report. After updating the table, I try to delete the lock object using dequeue function module in the called report, but though the subrc is 0, the lock entry is not getting deleted in SM12. The called report, after dequeue, again submits report 1 (the caller). So, when i try to do some operation for the same row which I first selected, it triggers Foreign_lock exception. When I completely go out of the base list, only then the entry is deleted. Can anyone tell me the reason? I have tried with parameters _SCOPE & _SYNCHRON, but same result.
Regards,
Sathish R

Hi,
The triggering of the dequeue is not in the proper position as it need to be placed.
Thats the only problem as per u have described the issue.
Place the deque as soon as the report is return the value.
I hope it may work ur issue.

Lock Entries - How to unlock

Hi Gurus,
I have an ID locking the Interactive Planning --> Demand Planning Area, this is not showing up in SM12,
but showing up from the menu --> Edit --> Lock Entries.
What do I do to unlock these?
Thanks
JS

Hello all,
Thanks for your time and response. But there has been an abrupt shutdown of the system, and there is nothing in SM04, SM12, SM66 SM50 running as suggested by all of you. And the locked planning areas are getting unlocked after certain period of time. This is a recurring problem happening to Planning areas.
I am trying to see if I have to patch my system, this is new dev installation SAP SCM version 5.1
Any ideas would be helpful.
Thanks
JS

Lock Entries are having the false time

Hello!
I've a problem in the lock table.
When I look at the status screen there is standing the right time.
But the lock entries are listed with a time which is 10 minutes in the future.
Can somebody tell me where this field gets his values? The lock table is in the shared memory I think, but I can't understand why there is the false time.
Thank you for your answers!
Florian

Hi,
do you mean the time of my system?
This time is correct.
The system time of the ERP Server and my system is nearly the same and the time of the lock entries not.
At our CRM system it is correct.
And at our Test-Systems it is also correct.

Lock entries standard table

Hi Experts,
Please help in finding which SAP Standard table can we find the lock entries(SM12 transaction).
Thanks!

Prerequisites
You have generated the demo data for the SQL Tutorial.
Log on to the database instance DEMODB as user MONA.
Examples
You can use the system table LOCKS to determine the following database information, among other things:
●     All locks that are currently held on table ROOM
SELECT lockmode, lockstate, rowidlength, rowidhex, rowid
FROM DOMAIN.LOCKS
    WHERE tablename = 'ROOM'
●     All locks that the current user holds in that database session on table ROOM
SELECT lockmode, lockstate, rowidlength, rowidhex, rowid
FROM DOMAIN.LOCKS, SYSINFO.SESSIONS
    WHERE tablename = 'ROOM'
      AND locks.session = sessions.sessionid
●     All locks that are currently held on the table with the hexadecimal internal identification 000000000000035D
SELECT lockmode, lockstate, rowidlength, rowidhex, rowid
FROM DOMAIN.LOCKS
    WHERE tableid = X'000000000000035D'
If the current user is the database administrator (DBA user) or the database system administrator (SYSDBA user), then all currently held locks are shown.
Users that belong to other user classes only see the locks held by that one user.
Definition
The system table LOCKS describes the current lock entries and entries for lock requests.
Structure
LOCKS
SESSION
FIXED(10)
ID of the database session
TRANSCOUNT
CHAR(20)
Transaction identification in the database session
PROCESS
FIXED(10)
Process identification in the database instance
USERNAME
CHAR(32)
Name of the user
DATE
DATE(10)
Creation date of the lock
TIME
TIME(8)
Creation time of the lock
TERMID
CHAR(18)
User terminal identification
LASTWRITE
CHAR(10)
Elapsed time since the last SQL statement for data manipulation
LOCKMODE
CHAR(14)
Type of lock (NULL value | SHARE | EXCLUSIVE)
LOCKSTATE
CHAR(10)
Status of lock
APPLPROCESS
FIXED(10)
Process identification on the client hardware
APPLNODE
CHAR(64)
Client hardware identification
SCHEMANAME
CHAR(32)
Name of the schema of the table
OWNER
CHAR(32)
Name of the owner of the table
TABLENAME
CHAR(32)
Name of the table
TABLEID
CHAR(8) BYTE
ID of the table
ROWIDLENGTH
FIXED(4)
Length of the key of the locked row
ROWIDHEX
CHAR(64) BYTE
Start of the key of the locked row in hexadecimal notation
ROWID
CHAR(128)
Start of the key of the locked row
http://dev.mysql.com/doc/maxdb/en/c4/812640632cec01e10000000a155106/content.htm

Too many lock entries on BUT000 in SRM7

Hi,
When we are trying to update attributes of Org units through FM BBP_UPDATE_ATTRIBUTES, there are so many lock entries created for different values on table BUT000.
We are calling the said FM in loop becasue this FM has the capability of updating just one ORG unit at a time. So while the loop runs, there are a lot of lock entries created on BUT000 which are just not getting unlocked automatically.
There is a huge performance hit due to this. We are not sure how and why BUT000 entries are getting locked while updating org unit attributes.
Please suggest what should be a remedy to this.
Thanks,
Tirth

i dont know BUT000 table and have no idea what it does, but i suspect that it works like with every other thing in SAP system.
In DEV you mostly have not much data. E.G. in your case lets say 200 BUT000 entries.
200 lock entries aint a problem for the system.
In Quality you SHOULD have more data, up to number of data in production. If you have nearly same amount of data in Q like in P the problem should have existed in quality as well.
Another thing is that in productive MORE people work.
See there is a table where your lock entries get stored, if that table exceeds some certain amount of entries your system is going to slow down up to dumping or timeouting.
So in production system there are probably other people as well creating lockj entries with various transactions, while when you tested it in quality you were probably not much users on the system.

How to check the Lock Entries Dynamically

Hi
I have a list of Objects in an internal table and i want to know which one of these objects are locked by another users.
I am using SAP standard Lock object 'EPNODE' and its FM 'ENQUEUE_EPNODE ' to Lock the entries.
Please suggest how i can find among a list of objects, which one are locked.
Please suggest any transparent table which hold lock entries or any Function Module which check for lock entries.
Thanks in adavance

Hi
Just double click on the FM, it will take you to SE37
click on IMPORT tab there you find import parameters against which there is the associated type
you need to declare your variables(parameteres) according to these associated types
whatever the FM it may be, the process is same
Hope this would solve your problem
Regards
Ramchander Rao.k

Lock entries for FM - 'ALM_ME_READ_CATALOG_PROFILE'

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for