Lock relevant fields.

Hi all
What is the significance of lock relevant fields in materialmaster.
The actual problem is:
I have made a field as required entry in material master. I have done the settings correctly. But i'm not able to see the particular field in the material master creation screen.
When i save the master data it says "Error in posting" which says that the paricular field is required. In the long text it says those fields may be lock relevant.
In OMSFIX the indicator for lock reevant is not set for the particular field.
I dont know where exactly the issue is.
Can any one give me some light in this regard.
Thanks in Advance,
Shakthi.

Hi,
Go to OMSR and check the status of field by clicking field selection group.arrow at rigth hand side of fields.it must be hide.
rewards point if helpful,
Regards,
Chetan.

Similar Messages

  • Define Lock-Relevant Fields

    Hi there ,
                 As per my understanding if we set the lock indicator for the field in SPRO then we cannot change the value of that field in the material master in future .......
    Am I correct ?? Please comment..
    Thanks & Regards
    Kaushik

    Hi
    If any field you make it as Lock-relevant field and for any material you have locked using MM02  by clicking Lock(CtrlShiftF1) , saved. then that particular field value cannot be modified for that material.
    In test systems, you can set fields flagged as lock-relevant to
    non-lock-relevant at any time. You do this by cancelling the
    Lock-relevant indicator. In production systems, you can do this only if there are no locked materials in the system. If locked materials already exist, you can only flag further fields as lock-relevant.
    Regards,
    Krishna Mohan

  • Created form in Livecycle Designer 8, send to 2nd party to complete some fields, want to lock those fields so that when sent to 3rd party to complete cannot edit

    I am a newby to this product and have created a form from a PDF.  I used Adobe Livecycle Designer to place text fields in form.  I saved, then enabled user rights.  I sent to 2nd party to open in Adobe reader.  This person needs to populate some of the fields.  Once this is done the 2nd person is to email to 3rd person who will complete the outstanding fields and return the form to the second person.
    How do I stop the 3rd person from editing the text the second person put in the form?
    I want the second person to receive the complete form back not just the responses put in the text fields?  Does this happen automatically or do you have to tell it send complete form.
    Thanks from Sandra in Australia

    How do you save the file? Do you directly send it via mail with a button? (If the question is silly I'm sorry, because I have no lincenses... so I am completly unaware of the choices you have.)
    You need to be able to save a file Reader Extension licenses I think...
    Probably you should ask for the fake E-Mailbutton, to be able to send it to different people one after the other...
    Make an invisible Decimalfield.
    The preSave/preSubmit field javascript...:
    this.rawValue = this.rawValue + 1
    if (this.rawValue > 0)
    {Decimalfield1.access="readOnly";}
    if (this.rawValue > 1)
    {Decimalfield2.access = "readOnly"}
    will lock decimalfield1 after the first save/submit and decimalfield2 after the second. Normally that should do the job.
    PS: Another way to save the document and lock ALL fields, you don't have to buy additional licenses is print it as pdf.

  • GRC 10.01 - RCM report to be added with control relevance fields

    Hi GRC Experts,
    I
    I need to add Control relevance fields into the RCM report - Risk and control Matrix. I added through the IMG node as below:
    Governance, Risk and Compliance-->Reporting-->Maintain Report Column Settings and selected the F7 report and clicked the columns and added the fields CN_RELEVANCE and CN_RELEVANCE_T. It worked fine in the Development system.
    When I moved the transport into QA, the RCM report is not having any columns to display and it says 'Table does not contain visible columns'.
    Appreciate any help on this issue.
    Regards,
    Saran.

    Hi Ravi,
    Can you try in the following IMG path.. I never faced this, but gut feel says importing report from 000 should help
    IMG Path is Controlling > Cost Center Accounting > Information System > Standard Reports
    Regards
    Ajay M

  • Locking Selected Fields on Submit

    Hello,
    I've been working on a multiple-item quote request form. My intention is that Party A (Requestor) will fill in the item description and details necessary for Party B (Vendor) to provide a quote. The form will be emailed to the Vendor who will complete the remaining fields (price and delivery) and email the form back to the Requestor.
    The item description and details (provided by Requestor) and the item price and delivery (provided by Vendor) are both wrapped in thier own subform and both are contained in a repeating subform. I've scripted the buttons that add/delete instances of the subform for each separate item being quoted and the button that emails the form to the Vendor. It took me a long time, but I finally got the buttons to work!
    Now I'd like to find a way to 'lock' the fields filled by the Requestor when the form is emailed but still leave the fields open that need to be completed by Vendor. I'd also like to lock the contact information fields at the top at the same time. I've attached a JPEG with the form layout to clarify...
    I've been reading a lot of old posts regarding similar topics and tried some of the solutions provided but cannot seem to make them work for my application. The closest I've been able to come is locking the entire form. I have the form set to email on event=click of the "Submit to Vendor via Email" button and the locking action on the event=mouseup of the same button.
    Does anyone know how I should approach this? I'm begining to think I designed my form and myself into a corner! Unfortunately I do not have a server on which to host the form but would be happy to email it to anyone willing to help.
    Thanks,
    Jake

    I dont know what I was thinking.  After some rest, and a second look, I can see this what the code is doing.
    I am trying to provide a button that will lock elements on individual pages that are part of multiple instances. Note, each instance will contain said button.
    Example: TRANSMITTAL[3].lockButton should only lock items on that instance of  TRANSMITTAL[3].
    The two attempts had different results
    form1.TRANSMITTAL.lockButton::click - (JavaScript, client)
    var j = _TRANSMITTAL.count;
    for (var i=0; i<j; i++){
         var currentSubform = xfa.resolveNode("TRANSMITTAL[" + i + "]");
         varLOCK.LockAllFields(currentSubform, "Lock");
    ..resulted in Locking ALL instances.
    form1.TRANSMITTAL.lockButton::click - (JavaScript, client)
    varLOCK.LockAllFields(form1.TRANSMITTAL);
    ..resulted in nothing.
    Any suggestions?

  • Lock/ disable field in planned order MD12

    Dear expert,
    Can we lock the field in planned order? In my case, I want the purchasing staff to be able to change only the production version, for others field i want them to be locked. Therefore the purchasing cannot change any fields in there except the production version.
    this is due to the need for material subcon.
    Maybe u can give any advice. what should i do?? do i need to make new customizing t-code for ex: ZMD12 or just make new customizing from authorization t-code su3?
    Thanks
    Pauline

    Dear Pauline,
    Check in SE93,by creating a new T Code ,with the start object as Transaction with variant.
    Transaction type: Variant transaction
    In the SAP Reference IMG, under "Basis Components" -> "Application Personalizaion" -> "Tailoring of Application Transactions",  you can define transaction variants. These allow you to preassign values to fields within a transaction, define field attributes, or hide entire screens.
    To run a transaction variant, you define a variant transaction. On the next screen, enter the name of the transaction and the name of the variant.
    Note
    Variant transactions are client-specific.
    If you try to start a variant transaction and the corresponding variant does not exist, the transaction runs without a variant.
    If the above does not helps you means,check this link to explore more,
    Transaction variant
    Regards
    Mangalraj.S

  • What is the use of CM relevance field in DMS ?

    Hi DMS gurus,
    What is the use CM relevance field in DMS ?
    Is there any specific scenario ?
    Regards,
    Sunny

    Hi Sunny,
    Usually CM (Configuration Management) is used when lifecycle phases come into picture as in lifecycle phases each phase has its own configuration which has to be maintained.
    During their life, products and projects go through various life-cycle phases such as engineering and design, sales, production, and maintenance. In each life-cycle phase, a product has different configurations. A configuration is made up of multiple different objects that describe the product in the relevant life-cycle phase. For example, these can be documents, materials, BOMs or other objects. The grouping of objects changes over the course of time and is different from life-cycle phase to life-cycle phase.
    Configuration Managment can be very much used when we make use of ECR/ECM (engineering change request/engineering change order) linked with DMS.
    Thank You,
    Manoj

  • COPA - delta relevant field

    hi experts,
    I have created COPA data source in keb0, the delta method shows as Generic delta. here i have not done any settings for delta management. but when i do Full, init & delta info packages it woks correctly.
    i have some doubts... on whether delta relevant field is set automatically here. if so, how do we know which field it is.?
    also,
    what is the difference between generic delta and timestamp delta..
    should we do any settings related to delta, so as to make delta work correctly.
    regards.

    can anyone explain different fields of exmethods in roosource like
    V          Transparent Table or DB View
    D          Fixed Domain Value
    F1         Function Module (Complete Interface)
    F2         Function Module (Simple Interface)
    FS         Function Module (Segmented Data Transfer)
    Q          Extraction Using ABAP Query
    A          DataSource Append
    2. is extractor RKE_BIW_GET_DATA_API automatically created, is this FM getting automatically changed when we append fields to structure of a data source?
    regards.

  • How do I lock a field so the current type in it cannot be overriden?

    how do I lock a field so the current type in it cannot be overriden?

    You can make the field Read Only. You need to be aware that if the form is cleared the typed value in the field will clear and the text in the "Options" "Default Value" will become the field's value. You can use JavaScript to make a form field Read Only and set the default value.

  • Locking form fields

    I have an approval form that requirs input from several people. I would like to lock an individual's form field after they have entered data. Is this possible and if so, can someone tell me how to accomplish it?

    Yes ....I would wrap the two different parts that each user has to fill out in a subform and then create a scripting function to lock all fields in a given subform. I have included a sample that will show you the scripting object to do the locking. In this case it is locking the entire form, but if you pass in the subform that you want to lock then it will only lock the fields below the subform. The code to call the scripting obejct is behind the lclick event of the lock fields button. In my case I am passing in form1 (which is the root node of the form).
    Paul

  • How do i lock all fields without using the signature function with adobe lifecycle designer 9

    How do i lock all fields without using the signature function with adobe lifecycle designer 9 ...
    I want it to have the same affect as when a signature is used but not use that function. I want a button that says lock all fields. And then you can click it again to unlock all fields...
    Thanks

    Here you go!
    LOCK the form once its SAVEd?

  • How do i lock certain fields using a "lock" button?

    alright, I'm a totaly noob here. basically i have an Adobe PDF document and I'm trying to edit it in LiveCycle so that I can add a lock button for four text fields. Here are the fields:
    -name
    -manger name
    -cost center
    -dates
    we want our employees to be able to enter information, and then lock it so the recipients can't change the data. we have an existing form which has a button, but the new form someone created (it's  much different from the old one so we can't reuse that) doesn't have the feature. if there's an easier way to do this in acrobat that would also be helpful.
    thanks!

    You cannot lock it by the serial number. Report it to your carrier and the police. You said that the thief knows your pass code. Does that mean that the thief was a personal friend who would be close enough to you to know what your code was? If that is the case, ask your friend to return your phone.

  • ? using multiple approval signatures, each locking the fields with collections

    Having fun with LiveCycle to make a "signoff" sheet that will allow a customer to request a "new product" with a PDF form. Once that information is added to our EDR (Eng Design Request) form, I want the form to be forwarded to multiple departments, where each department manager adds their name, date, comments, and then signs the document and forwards it to the next manager. I have it set up with "locking" a "collection fields" with each signature, and that is cool to lock their comments to thier signature, such that someone else can't change their comments without first "clearing" their signature field... just what I wanted, cool,, taking it a step further, I wanted to have the original product data protected such that once signed by one, or more managers (Eng, Sales, President), that the data was locked unless all signatures were cleared. I tried this first by including the product definition fields in every signature's "collection of fields" (set to lock after signing). Thought that would be the ticket, pretty pumped to try it, but once I clear one signature, example the "Eng manager signature" I can go in and mess with the specs and then re-sign the document, and the other signatures are still there, thought I have to clear them, not good,,, 2nd try, I then tried to lock the preceeding "signature field" itself with the next signature (added "sig0" to "sig1" collection) and that worked once, but fell apart on the third approval, as clear one signature openned things right up, when it shouldn't have. Anyway, has anyone found a way to have an approval signoff sheet where once signed the data fields are locked unless all the signature(s) are cleared. I think the programming is not handing multiple locks on the sme field properly, ie all locks on that field must be removed for that field to become editable,, There may be a better way to tackle this..
    PS, I have really learned to be cautious when saving the form out of LiveCyle, then renaming it and save out or "Pro" with read permisions enabled, then see if "Reader" can open it,,, if U R not carefull you get and error that the "document has changed and reader can't save, contact the author,,," that was scary as I had to surf through lots of old revs to find one that would work again, something salvagable without going back to MSWord,,,
    Thanks for your help...

    I think I found a way to get it to do what I want,,,
    1) Use the first signature collection lock to lock only the fields that that person is signing-off on.
    2) The next manager then signs off and locks only his comments and text boxes, as well as the signature of the preceeding manager. This way text fields are only locked by one signature collection and thus to edit anything you have to clear that manager's signature to edit the related text boxes, then to re-sign that section you must clear the other (higher level) signatures to open up the signature field for resigning,,, I think this is providing the protection I want,,, Yea,,, let's get this form back into our stupid ISO system ;)

  • Locking database fields using Servlet

    Hi,
    I am developing a servlet application which is used to access and/or modifying a database on a server. I am now asked for locking fields if a user is accessing the information while others have already loaded the same information page preventing it from changing the same fields that an other user is currently viewing.
    The problem is that my server, running the servlet, is the only one to access the DB (using JDBC) and the connection is always done with the same username/pwd. This connection is done for a short period of time, that is, the time to create the HTML page.
    Is there a way to keep the servlet knowing who is connected to it? With that feature, I could ask for username and pwd for each user and then locking tables on the DB for them.
    I'm I clear enough? I don't feel so... ;)
    Thanks in advance for any hints!
    Snoozer

    Did you try to use:
    request.getRemoteUser()

  • Lock input-fields on digitally signing the form

    Hi,    
    Is it possible to lock the input-fields once the form has been signed?
    Also I want to pass the digital Certificate along with the pdf. How do I do it?
    Please help me. 
    Thanks,
    Prasanna

    Hello Prasanna,
    If i understood your first question correctly, you don't want to allow the changes in the InputField.
    Create a context variable type boolean and assign it to readOnly(nameChange) property of input field.
    You can change its property in your business logic
    like
    wdContext.ecurrentContext().setNameChange(true/false).
    Regards,
    Sridhar

Maybe you are looking for