Logic for Deletion of a row is not reflecting in DEV instance

Hi ,
I have a method in AM attached to a Search screen which has logic to delete rows from 3 different VOs.
1. VO for selecting the rows from Details table.
2. VO for selecting the rows from Master table.
3. VO for holding the rows of results tables.
The results table displays rows from both master table and details table. On selecting a row for delete in results table , the remove() method is being called to remove rows from the three VOs in the same order mentioned above.
This logic works perfectly in my local setup. The commit was initially not getting recognized. So , we included the line "JDBC\:processEscapes=true" after which delete and commit started working fine in my local setup.
But the same code does not work in the DEV instance. Can anyone please suggest what can be done in such a case.
Thanks,
Chandrika

Thanks for your reply,
As we did registration again now for the problematic server autoreaction method is now visible in RZ20
But it is not picking up the alert for the scenarios. Also found other 2 server is also giving error while connection test below is screen shot.
I checked the log file. Foundthe agent lock is not getting updated.
and error log details
[Thr 4396]
Fri Jun 27 08:12:44 2014
INFO: Register central system PSM.
INFO: Register central system: System PSM already registered as central system. Trying to update...
ERROR: Register central system: cannot stop agent, because the agent is restarting.
Fri Jun 27 08:44:56 2014
INFO: Unregister central system PSM.
ERROR: Unregister central system: cannot stop agent, because the agent is restarting.
[Thr 7084]
Fri Jun 27 08:52:07 2014
INFO: Register central system PSM.
INFO: Register central system: System PSM already registered as central system. Trying to update...
ERROR: Register central system: cannot stop agent, because the agent is restarting.
Can you please check and let me know the fix to resolve the error.

Similar Messages

Commit not reflected in multiple instances

Hi,
I have 2 instance myapp1 and myapp2 for the db myapp. The version is 10g. When I run a procedure to insert multiple records and commit in one instance, it is not reflected in other instance for atleast 2-3 minutes. I believe it should happen instantly.
Can anyone throw light on this?
Regds,
noneda

Are you on 10gR1 or 10gR2?
On 10gR1, max_commit_propagation_delay(as sybrandb said) parameter can affect the delay of commit propagation. You need to check this parameter or browse metalink for bugs.
On 10gR2, this parameter is deprecated and commit is propagated without delay. So you seem to on 10gR1. If not, you need to check metalink for similar phenomenons.

Editable ALV issue: When Delete/Modify a row, ztable doesnt reflect changes

Greeting Fellow Abapers,.
I have been running into an issue that I need some advice on. I am allowing users to edit a Ztable via ALV. When the quantity field is updated everything is fine. However, when the field "lic_plate" is edited the code appends another row into the Ztable instead of modifying it. Also, when the delete row functionality of the grid is used the row is not deleted from the Ztable.
Here is the ztable structure. The fields I allow to be edited are in BOLD...
ZPALLET-VBELN
ZPALLET-MATNR
ZPALLET-LINE_NUM
ZPALLET-LIC_PLATE
ZPALLET-LOT_NUMBER
ZPALLET-PAL_TYPE
ZPALLET-MAN_DATE
ZPALLET-QUANTITY
ZPALLET-PROC_DATE
Here is the source code that the APPEND is taking place...
FORM save_database .
Getting the selected rows index*
CALL METHOD o_grid->get_selected_rows
    IMPORTING
      et_index_rows = i_selected_rows.
Through the index capturing the values of selected rows*
LOOP AT i_selected_rows INTO w_selected_rows.
    READ TABLE itab INTO wa INDEX w_selected_rows-index.
    IF sy-subrc EQ 0.
      MOVE-CORRESPONDING wa TO w_modified.
      APPEND w_modified TO i_modified.
    ENDIF.
ENDLOOP.
IF sy-subrc = 0.
    MODIFY zpallet FROM TABLE i_modified.
ENDIF.
ENDFORM.
Please help. I am in your debt.
...as always, points will be awarded.
Best,
Dan

Hello Dan
When you are using an editable ALV for table maintenance you have to take care that the users
- cannot edit the key fields of existing DB records   and
- every new record (row) does not match any existing record (i.e. has identical key field values)
Instead of relying on selected rows for the DB update I would recommend to store a "PBO image" of your data and compare this with the "PAI image" of the data as soon as the user pushes the SAVE button.
Example:
DATA:
gt_outtab_pbo    TYPE   < your table type>, " PBO image
gt_outtab           TYPE   < your table type>. " PAI image
" 1. Select data from DB table and store in both itabs:
SELECT * ... INTO TABLE gt_outtab.
gt_outtab_pbo = gt_outtab.
" 2. Display editable ALV list -> user modifies gt_outtab
" 3. SAVE function requested
" ... compare gt_outtab vs. gt_outtab_pbo
" .... INSERT, UPDATE, or DELETE DB records
" Finally set:
gt_outtab_pbo = gt_outtab.
" 2. User continues with editing
In order to compare PBO vs. PAI data you may have a look at my sample coding:
[Comparing Two Internal Tables - A Generic Approach|https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/sdn/wiki?path=/display/snippets/comparing%2btwo%2binternal%2btables%2b-%2ba%2bgeneric%2bapproach]
Regards,
Uwe

Please suggest solution for deletion of all rows in table at a time

Suggest me pl/sql code for a push button in form to delete entire rows in a table.
BEGIN
LOOP
DELETE
FROM mytable(say table name)
WHERE ROWNUM < 20000;
EXIT WHEN SQL%ROWCOUNT = 0;
COMMIT;
END LOOP;
END;
I wrote this code but not deleted .
Execute immediate truncate table <tablename>; this code too not working.
What my need is I dont want to put entire block fields in the form, just I want to put a push button and when I pressed it must delete all rows in a particular table.
That I want to delete all rows form builder runtime not by entering sql.8.0 and then there delete the rows.
thanks in advance
prasanth a.s.

to delete all records in a table, if you want to get good performance, then use:
FORMS_DDL('TRUNCATE TABLE your_table_name');
It is better than use DELETE FROM TABLE_NAME. But if you have condition in where clause, then you have to use DELETE FROM ...

Which app is the best for deleting the apps we do not need?

I am concerned about the fact that when u delet an app, some parts of it still resides within. so what should I do?

I bought AppZapper first, then AppDelete and then downloaded AppCleaner. I've tried all three on the same app and AppDelete seems to be the best of the three. However, AppCleaner is free and is much better than AppZapper.
One thing to keep in mind is that many apps from reputable third-party software companies come with an unistaller. I've been following a MacKeeper thread in the Mountain Lion forum and while it's 'old' uninstaller didn't work too well - leaving annoying popups around - the 2012 version seems to have a good uninstaller. So if you mistakenly downloaded and installed MacKeeper (malware rubbish) recently, using the uninstaller seems to work. Look for uninstallers first - if it's a small app that has no uninstaller, use AppCleaner. Even some of the big third party apps (MS Office 2008, for instance) that don't come with uninstallers have detailed instructions on how to complete remove all traces of their software.
So my rule of thumb is - check for an uninstaller first. If there is none available, use AppCleaner (or AppDelete, if you want to pay for it).
Good luck,
Clinton

AOL: deleted mail on laptop is not reflected in iTouch mail

My wife will read HER AOL e-mail on her iTouch when she is out at the office. Then later when she is home she will read her AOL e-mail via her MacBook and THEN delete messages from AOL via her main account. Yet, when she updates the mail on her iTouch the list of e-mails visible on the iTouch does not change (sync?) to reflect the deletions that she made on her MacBook. Plus it says she has something like nearly 100 messages to download?!?
I have set-up my sbcglobal account to remove e-mails from their server ONLY when it is downloaded onto my G4 at home - all other remotely accessed e-mail stays on the server until such time as I read those saved e-mails from home and then they are expunged but saved on my computer at home. I assume there is a similar setting for AOL: that is - keep everything on their server but only REMOVE it from their server when it is downloaded at home.
Or is this more of a fundamental set-up issue with the mail account on the iTouch?

You are correct in assuming that you can set the iPod to leave messages on the server. I do it all of the time.
To change the e-mail settings got to Settings > Mail, Contacts, Calendars > Account Name > Advanced. You will see a setting "Delete from server" option that you can set to what you need.
This is correct as long as you are dealing with a pop account. If AOL mail is imap, then deleting items on the touch results in inbox items being deleted on the server.
Mail syncing on the touch via iTunes does not sync messages, however. Your wife will have to delete messages on her touch after she reads them. The only way around this, at least currently, is to use Apple's Mobile Me system.

SAP HCM Module - Deleted PERNER in R/3 not reflected in BI

Hi All,
I am working in HCM Module, where most the loads used are full loads. I am facing one problem that whenever a PERNER is deleted from R/3 , it does not get reflected in BI (0EMPLOYEE) i.e the deleted employee still remains in BI as the load is full, to avoid this I had to refresh the entire transaction & master data & again reload the data so that the deleted PERNER does not appear, this process is very time consuming.
Are there any alternative available to avoid this issue?..is any flag gets maintained in table when a PERNER is deleted from R/3?..
Kindly help.....
Thanks & Regards
Indraneel

I have seen this question surface several times in SDN.
PERNR's should not be deleted from the R/3 system but rather delimited and "deactivated" by a personnel action so that their employment status shows up as Inactive with the delimited time period. Then they come over into BW as Inactive and usually will not show up on any more staffing reports unless the users are looking for Inactive employees. This is a best practice in the R/3 system.
Otherwise, you are stuck with drops/reloads of the Data Target and Master Data (if possible). However, 0EMPLOYEE is used everywhere in the HR content in BI so it's difficult to clean up the master data after the employee has been loaded since the SID would get tied up in all the data targets that have the data for that employee.
Hope this helps!

Updating a row is not reflected after committing and it takes the old value

Sir,
I have been stuck at this problem for quite some time. So, I have a updatable table with editall property but i am controlling each column's read only property based on the value of the checkbox present in that table.So, if the user clicks on the checkbox ,the entire row becomes editable. But when i am changing the value of the row and pressing the commit button , it does not take the new value but the postback happens with the old value only. If i just drag the table as editall table and edit something , the commit button does reflect the change.
How to solve this. Please help

Frank,
The reason i am not using the ClicktoEdit feature is because my aim is that the user clicks on multiple checkbox and then press the update button ,then all the checked rows becomes editable and the user can update them. But unfortunately, this feature is also not working .I am going step by step. So, i have checkboxes which the user can click to update them but it is not committing the change. Could u please help me or suggest some other way round. If u want any other information , please do ask.
Thanks

Single-sourcing: Deleted content in FM source not reflected in RH update

I discovered today that, when I delete content in my linked FM source, the same content is not deleted or even marked as 'changed' or anything in the RH update!
In one situation, I deleted an entire chapter but the topic wasn't deleted.
In another, I deleted a section of a chapter, but the section wasn't deleted from the topic. In both cases, I saved the changes in FM before running the update in RH.
Is this a known but undocumented feature? Did I miss a setting somewhere? Is there a fix or update?
It pretty much invalidates the whole purpose of 'linking and updating.'
Win 7, TC3.

Bizarre. With another linked book, the deleted FM content was deleted from the RH project. I can't figure out why it worked with one book and not the other.

Deleting ruleset in content group not reflecting on storefront

We have a content group with a product set in it. Its working fine a product on storefornt.
We are trying to delete the ruleset so that no product should appear in the storefornt.
We deleted the ruleset and deployed the project. But, still the product is displayed in the storefront.
We checked the .properties file of the CG and it has no ruleset.
We checked the CG component in the prod dyn/admin. But the 'rules' property of the CG has the previous rule still set in it.
Now we restarted the prod server. The product now doesn't appear in the storefront and the rules property in the CG is set to null as well.
Why is it that the CG doesn't reflect changes when we empty the rules in CG and deploy it?
Thanks,
Ashish

Hi,
Can you please explain (without resorting to technicalities) what are you trying to accomplish..? Not populating the Installment plan positions with Installment plan number, I hope..? What document number needs to go into positions of which document?
cheers
Jānis

Deleted records in R/3 not reflected in BW

Hi All,
If a particular record is deleted in R/3 how would that reflect in BW ?
Regards,
Madhavi

Hi,
in case of a ods, it is as Ravi mentioned. You can see the record in the change log, with a before/after image recordmode, setting the value of the keyfigures to 0.
In case of a cube, you can see the record in transaction listcube if you add the request id to the output of the transaction. There you will see two records, the original one and the deletion with inverted keyfigures which sum up to 0.
regards
Siggi

Edited/Recompiled JSP not reflected in OC4J instance

After starting OC4J to run my JSP project, if I edit and make/build a jsp, I won't get the updated version if I go to the page without first stopping the process and restarting OC4J. Am I missing something to get it to deploy on the fly if I edit it? It's a bit cumbersome to have to stop and start OC4J everytime I tweak a JSP page a little.
Andrew

Doing the right-click-run option will not work for me as I'm using a Model 2 pattern for my JSP development. The JSP has to have been served by a controller servlet before being valid. And I definitely know it's not a cache issue, I can see a log being generated everytime I refresh the page, but no matter how many times I make/rebuild/make, the changes don't show up. And besides, I thought the right-click-run option essentially starts a new OC4J instance, not continuing the previous version, isn't that right? I'd like to maintain state of the current session and not have to end up logging back in to my app everytime I tweak a character on a JSP page.
I know other, much simpler, JSP containers are able to do this, like Tomcat running in JBuilder 6. There, if I edit a JSP page, recompile it, and access it from a browser, it will show up with the changes. Perhaps someone at the JDeveloper team can clarify this for me?
Andrew

Changes in WCEM NWDS not reflected in DEV

hi,
I have setup my NWDS with the development track to NWDI.
Imported all Develoment Components,etc.
I am making changes to WCEM java files and xhtml files, checking in the activity and I see Activation performed and build request id logs on NWDS.
But i do not see these changes refelected on my DEV system.
Am I missing any step?
How can I check if changes were deployed to the DEV server?
Thank you

Hi Kandala,
Have you confirgured the SAP J2EE Engine settings and set the hot & port? If you have done already then did you build & deploy your application on this server and changes reflect or not.
If all these thing are working here then only you should check in and activate your activity.
Please let me know if you are facing any further problem.
Thanks,
Hamendra

Is it possible to change warning "& is marked for deletion" to a hard error

As part of our periodic update of our bank directory in transaction BAUP, Bank Keys which are no longer valid are marked for deletion. We are not at the point where we are archiving records yet, so the actual deletion has not occurred in our system.
When an HR user updates a person's bank information (transaction PA20 or PA30, InfoType 09), if they enter one of these bank keys, they are given a warning that the bank key is marked for deletion. However, this is not a hard stop, only a warning message. As a result, they are able to save the record with an invalid bank key. The details indicate that this is message class F4, message 230. However, it appears from the IMG that it may be message 210. I have tried working with each of them.
I have attempted to change the message to a hard error in message control, but have not been able to do so. I receive an error telling me that "Message 230 (or 210) is not allowed". I have tried several application areas, including FV, Electronic Banking Messages.
Is there any way in configuration to change this to a hard error? If so, please supply details, including application area.
Also, are there risks of disruption of standard business processes if we do change this to a hard error? I know that this same message is issued for other master data elements which are marked for deletion such as GL accounts or Customer records,
Thank you.
I have searched forums with terms "marked for deletion" and "warning" but have not found an answer. I have also searched various outside expert forums on this topic. Everything I have seen seems to assume that this message will be a warning only.
Aoife B.
Edited by: Aoife Bratton on Oct 16, 2008 4:16 PM
Edited by: Aoife Bratton on Oct 16, 2008 4:16 PM

If particular message is not allowed in OBA5, then it is not configurable message. Neverthless if you like to change this message, you need to configure this in OBMSG first

Purchasing Info Record marked for deletion

Hi experts,
I need some explanation on Purchasing Info Records and more precisely on the deleted ones.
Could you tell me why a Purch. Info Record that is marked for deletion is still set when a PO is created?
In ME13 I have the following warning message : 06-718 (Purchasing info record & & & & flagged for deletion).
In ME21N the same message is displayed as warning and users are able to save the PO with the deleted Info Record.
I don't understand why SAP still retrieves Info Records that are marked for deletion...
Is there a way to prevent SAP from using deleted info records?
Thank you for your help.
Regards,
Philippe

Hi Philippe,
The message 06718 can be set as an error or warning in customising.
If message 06718 is set as error then system will not allow to save
the document with that info record.
The deletion indicator is the reservation to delete this record. But
this is not comparable with the deletion of the record from the database
This has to be done within the archiving run for the object MM_EINA.
Untill this inforecord is not archived the data is taken as usual."
Online documentation provides the following information
"You cannot delete obsolete info records immediately. You can
only flag them for subsequent deletion. Info records earmarked for
deletion in this way are not actually deleted until the archiving
program is run. This is done at regular intervals by your system
administrator. You can flag an individual info record for deletion,
or create a list of deletion proposals and choose the relevant records
that are to be deleted from this list."
Kind regards,
Lorraine

Logic for Deletion of a row is not reflecting in DEV instance

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for