Looks good in FCE but DVD looks bad

Hi Guys hope you can help, Have FCE, imports from sony handycam , everything looks good and tight in FCE but when exported to iDVD the finished product looks terrible, hard to describe but looks blurry, almost a ghosting to motion shots, this doesn't do it when I burn from iMovie, I've tried different setups in easy setup with no luck, However I did ( out of frustration) export back to tape and then import into iMovie and then burned from there and it looked much better, please help, thank you

Thank you for responding so quickly, I'm not sure what you require for spec on the Mac but it's a Mac Pro with Hardware Overview:
Model Name: Mac Pro
Model Identifier: MacPro1,1
Processor Name: Dual-Core Intel Xeon
Processor Speed: 2.66 GHz
Number Of Processors: 2
Total Number Of Cores: 4
L2 Cache (per processor): 4 MB
Memory: 2 GB
OS isMac OS X 10.5.4, FCE is version 4, Quicktime is version 7.5, iMovie is version 7.1.4
Sony camcorder is DCR-SR42( 1/6 type) CCD 680,000 pixels, this is a non-tape type, internal harddrive. Note: I also have a Sony DCR TRV 310 tape type that FCE does see and able to control, Clip info says Compressor = DV/DVCPRO- NTSC Data rate = 3.6MB/sec
FCE doesn't see the Sony DCR-SR 42 camcorder when I connect ( via USB) but iMovie does, so I download into iMovie, clips come in as a .mov, clip info says 720x480, FCE clip info says : Creator =Quicktime Player, Compressor= Apple MPEG-2 SD camcorder Video, Data rate=1.2MB/sec, Frame size= 720x480, Vid Rate= 29.97 fps.
So files in iMovie, I open FCE and import files from iMovie , tried using the XLM export from iMovie and it does work however after doing compared testing on test DVD the imported files looked better than the XLMs. I have the easy setup using the DV-NTSC as that's the only one that comes close to what I'm using, same goes for when I export, I export using the Quicktime export with self contained off.
I have iDVD set to professional encoding, (ya I know , iDVD not that professional) when final burn is done and played on a DVD player on a LCD the finished video is really low resolution quality, the content is of a football game ( my sons) using tripod of coarse, but the images are rough, blockly, looks like really bad codec or wrong codec or wrong conversion type or too much compression. I have done other DVD's with iMovie from tape camera that look alot better than what I'm getting from FCE, Please help, what I'm I doing wrong, thank you

Similar Messages

  • Canon HF-200 1080i50 - Looks good in FCE but Export to Quicktime is jerky

    Hi,
    Title says it all really. I have FCE 4 and over the weekend I picked up a Canon HF-200 (PAL UK version). I am sort of impressed by the quality of the camera - I will probably post about that soon - but I have a real issue with 'Export to Quicktime' (the uncompressed MOV file).
    I have the 'easy setup' set so that its 1080i50. I used Log and transfer. I dragged a couple of clips onto the sequence (which looks great - perfect playback on the Viewer etc), saved the project, chose to Export the sequence. It gave me a huge file as expected but its jerky and pixelated during movement. A similar test with 25p clips worked fine - the Quicktime Movie looks as it did on the viewer.
    Any ideas?

    Hi,
    I also get the same problem. Just bought Canon HF 200 1080i50 European PAL model.
    And i've filmed a bunch of test videos 50i fps and 25p fps.
    And started to import in Final Cut Pro 6.0.5.
    Video settings:
    Sequence Preset: Apple ProRes 422 1920x1080 50i 48kHz
    Capture preset: HDV-Apple ProRes 422
    And it all seems so weired:
    Clips captured at 50i - looks interlaced and jagged - when i look at Item properties, there is Vid rate: 25fps Field Dominance: None ????????
    but
    Clips captured at 25fps - looks OK - when i look at Item properties, there is Vid rate: 25fps Field Dominance: Upper (Odd) ????????
    This all is not right .... there should be where 50i Field Dominance and not with 25fps

  • DV clips look bad, good when converted to H.264 in QuickTime and reimported

    Still a problem after 7.0.1:
    DV camera -> iMovie 08 -> looks bad when playing and exporting/sharing
    DV camera -> iMovie 08 -> "reveal in finder" -> clip opened in QuickTime -> looks good -> export as H.264 -> re-import to iMovie 08 -> looks good when playing and exporting/sharing.
    In plain words: Importing DV clips from my DV camera into iMovie gives bad results when playing and exporting/sharing. Have tried everything, but the clips look blurry and not sharp at all. The actual DV clip in the events folder looks sharp and clear.
    If I take the very same DV clip from the events folder ("reveal in finder"), open it in QuickTime, export it as H.264 and then re-import to iMovie 08, it looks brilliant, retaining the quality the DV clip in the events folder has.
    Why can't the DV clips look good in the first place? What is it that iMovie 08 does to these poor clips? Some have suggested re-encoding, re-rendering and so on, but if I do just that in QuickTime and re-import it to iMovie 08, it still looks razor sharp and crystal clear. No reason that iMovie 08 shouldn't handle the DV file in the same manner.
    Some have suggested that this is because iMovie 08 internally re-encodes to AIM or H.264, enabling edits with different kinds of formats, but if I do this myself in QuickTime before importing to iMovie 08, the problem isn't there!
    If this is difficult to achieve, why not add the option of importing from a DV camera as H.264 and not DV? That would make my day!
    (I have posted this to Apple using the feedback menu item in iMovie 08.)
    (Background here in these threads:)
    http://discussions.apple.com/thread.jspa?threadID=1088568
    Sample clips in Apple TV format here:
    http://discussions.apple.com/thread.jspa?messageID=5173005

    iMovie '08 stores rendered projects in H.264 form. This happens when you render to the Media Browser. The rendered file(s) (you can have several different sizes) are in the iMovie '08 project package. The original flies in your Events folders stay in whatever format they were in.
    Yes, the movies exported to the Media Browser use the H.264 format, the same as iMovie HD 5/6 did when we exported using the presets Email, Web, Web Streaming and CD-ROM. They were all H.264 too. Apple is obviously putting the (powerful) H.264 to good use to prepare movies for Web pages and other purposes.
    As you know, the Full Quality export in 5/6 was to the project's native format, which varied according to the type of project. For DV projects, that was DV video. Everything was converted to DV when imported into the project, and to preserve the original quality we could export to a Full Quality DV movie.
    There is nothing like that in iMovie 7, at least that I've seen. As you said, nothing is converted to a "native format" when imported to the project. (Still images are added to the project's single Apple Photo - JPEG "Still Images" movie, which is a nice twist.)
    So I think of iMovie 7 as having no "native" format, but a nicely-designed path for using H.264 as the delivery format. The Media Browser — a virtual library of movies with no shared place — is a nice invention.
    When I export slideshow movies in DV format out of FotoMagico I always select 'Best' and it DOES make a difference in iDVD.
    I think of iMovie 7's problem with DV as more profoundly flawed. Exporting ANY DV video that's in the project to DV or ANY OTHER format is messed up. It's the handling of the DV inside iMovie that's messed up, not just the export to DV.
    My guess is — and it's only a guess — that FotoMagico's Best setting adjusts the content of the image delivered for iDVD. Put another way, it prepares an image that works best with iDVD's own encoding algorithms.
    One long-standing diappointment I've had with iLife is that Apple has never coordinated the image it prepares for iDVD with what(ever) iDVD does best. It's as if the programmers never talk to each other. iMovie engineers have never asked the iDVD engineers how best to deliver the image to deliver the best quality on the DVD.
    Given Apple's emphasis on H.264, one would think that iDVD would be written to embrace any H.264 video and deliver great quality on the DVD. It doesn't. And with iLife '08 it doesn't even embrace iMovie's own DV exports!
    I suppose Blu-Ray will change all that, but for now we're stuck with a version of iLife that can't deliver a quality DVD of our home movies.
    Karl

  • Subject : Slideshow looks bad  Hello guys  I have a project in my Final Cut just about done.  I want to add my slideshow as part of the project and burn it to DVD.  In my slideshow, there are some stills from the movie clips and some downloaded from the i

    Subject : Slideshow looks bad
    Hello guys
    I have a project in my Final Cut just about done.  I want to add my slideshow as part ofthe project and burn it to DVD.  Inmy slideshow, there are some stills from the movie clips and some downloadedfrom the internet but they all look blur when playback and even worse if Iapply Ken Burn to it.   Pleasesome one can tell my how to do it right or it can’t be done because thedownload quality and stills from the clip are not suitable or slideshow.  Thank you
    PSC

    Thank you Ross.
    The entire DVD containing Quick Time movies (Final CutExpress project) and slideshow was done in iPhoto.  The Final Cut project was rendered prior to export to QT,  the slideshow was sent to iDVD withoutrendering. The slideshow with most of the pictures from my still camera incombination with stills from movie clips and some downloaded from the Internet.After burning, the movie playback is perfect but the slideshow is not.  The slideshow containing 3 differentkinds of pictures; those from my still camera looks OK; the stills from themovie clips and from the Internet are not.  I don’t have much knowledge in this game, but I think NTSCwith frame size 720x480, and the downloaded picture Item Property shows most ofthem are between 400 to 500 x 300 to 600, may be both of them are not suitablefor TV screen while the stills from my still camera looks OK because they are2048x1536.  Please enlightenme.  Once again, thank you so much,I really appreciate the time you offered.
    psc

  • SD DVD looks bad

    Hi,
    A few things.....trying to create SD DVD from HD footage.
    The movie looks great on the Mac using a HDTV (720) for moniter.
    1. DVD - some audio out of sync.
    2. DVD looks bad....color is lighter...image all grainy.
    It must be some simple settings.....
    please help.

    Compressor has made compression simpler but the one setting fits all approach will never be an absolute.
    Export a QT reference movie from FC(not self-contained or with QT conversion)
    Use one of the DVD presets in compressor based on the length of your program. Make sure you are creating an AC3 file of your audio and not an aiff.
    I have found Compressor to be consistently inconsistent when it tries to do HD-SD conversion for DSP. It can work well and then not so well.
    If you stil don't get the desired results you could try adjusting the frame control settings found in the inspector window of the MPG-2 setting. I would try better first as best tends to take 10 times longer to render.

  • H.264 Looks Bad on DVD

    I have some vidoes that I got from the internet that are in H.264. When I watch it on the computer and preview it in iDVD it looks great, but when I watch it on the DVD it looks terrible. I have already tried converting it to dv and MPEG-4. Does anybody have any suggestions?

    When I was editing, I pulled the DV footage into an HDV sequence. I exported the file in Apple ProRes 422. Once I did that, I brought it into Compressor and compressed it using DVD: Best Quality 150 minutes (since it was going to run slightly over 120 min.). Specifically, it compressed to mpeg-2 and dolby digital professional 2.0. Both sources were the same frame rate.
    What's puzzling me is that it looked bad on my tv but just fine on my friends HD tv. Hope some of this info helps in troubleshooting my issue.
    Thanks.

  • Showtime DVDs look bad

    I use my Mac Mini as a DVD player to my Samsung TV (LN-T4061). It works great. I'm thrilled with the results. Except with Showtime DVDs. ALL other DVDs look great. But DVDs (Tudors & Dexter) look really bad. Jerky and liney, almost like the sync is off kilter and the processor is too slow.
    These aren't burned or RIP'd DVDs, just off of Netflix, popped into the drive. The results are the same using Front Row or Apple DVD Player.
    The details:
    Mac Mini 1.83 GHz Intel Core 2 Duo
    1.5 GB RAM
    OX 10.5.4
    connected to the aforementioned Samsung TV via DVI typically using 1280 x 720 resolution (millions of colors) with overscan checked.
    I've tried many, many different resolution settings to no avail. Anyone have an idea of what might be going on? It's gotten to the point where I don't rent Showtime DVDs because I know they're unwatchable. Again, the weird part is that every other DVD (outta hundreds) I've tried works great.

    Well, VLC works. Which is better than where I was. All of VLC's deinterlacing options look better than DVD player. Blend looks particularly nice. It's not nearly as convenient as Front Row, but at least I can watch.
    Is there a way of changing interlacing options in Front Row?

  • My subs look good in dvdsp but when I burn an example the subs are too high in the frame.All my offsets are 0 and the alignment button is bottom.

    My subs look good in dvdsp but when I burn an example the subs are too high in the frame.All my offsets are 0 and the alignment button is bottom.
    Any thoughts

    Try creating a new project, and bring in a short clip and one or 2 subtitles and see if you see the same behavior.  If you don't,  something's probably wonky in the project.  If the sample behavior has the same problem, if you want to send it to me with the associated media, I'll take a quick look.
    My email is [email protected]

  • I'm using iweb 3.4 and trying to load audio files to my web page.  everything looks good in iweb but after publishing instead of having a control bar i have a "?".  does anyone know what to do?

    I'm using iweb 3.4 and trying to load audio files to my web page.  Everything looks good in iweb but after publishing instead of having a control bar i have a "?".  Does anyone know what to do?

    Where are you hosting the site, how are you uploading the files and what's the URL of your site so we can examine it first hand?
    Adding audio files by dragging onto the web page forces the viewer to have Quicktime installed on their computer in order to be able to listen to them.  Look at the audio player options on this page of Roddy's iWeb for Musicians site: Audio Players for your Music Website. 
    OT

  • Am I the only one getting bad quality youtube videos when running on LTE? When I'm on wifi they seem fine but I switch to lte it looks bad on the youtube app and on safari.

    Am I the only one getting bad quality youtube videos when running on LTE? When I'm on wifi they seem fine but I switch to lte it looks bad on the youtube app and on safari.

    I've never had any problems with mine ever. The only freeze I've had was from a file I recorded on tivo, cut commericals out in movie maker and then re-encoded to the lowest possible bit rate that that zens nati've resolution supports. Try turning your sensitivity in the touch pad down. Sometimes if you have it up to high you may have a chance of doing that (although I have only had slow response, instead of a freeze by doing that).
    You also have to compare to all of the other products out there: Ipod and Zune are a lot worse with pathetic little problems (annoyances). I didn't pay for tech support?

  • Why does my 24fps look bad on my TV?

    I just got the Panasonic AG-HMC150. I have shot some footage at both 1080p24 and 720p24. I transcode the files to Pro Res in FCP and they look pretty good, I realize the panning isn't as smooth as 60i. I drag one of the files into the FCP timeline and let it automatically "optimize my settings" for the sequence. I have verified that it is 23.98fps and field dominance is none. I have tried selecting "share" and going straight to AVCHD from FCP, and also taking the original MTS file, and Apple Pro Res and dropping into Toast and trying that way. The footage just looks choppy, jiddery and unsmooth. I have seen enough movies in my life to know that when they pan, or have cars drive by, that movies 24fps looks a million times better. My Sony HDTV even accepts and displays 24fps, and when I press info on the TV remote when watching one of these AVCHD discs it in fact says 1080 (or 720) 24p. It just looks bad. Even taking the HDMI output from the camera and hooking up to the TV and playing from the camera looks lousy.
    What am I doing wrong? I know a ton of post work goes into Hollywood movies, but why does their 24fps look nice and smooth and mine looks horrible? Do I need to render with pulldown in FCP or something. I can't figure it out. Any advice, suggestions?

    I transcode through FCP to apple pro res, the files shows up as 1920x1080 24fps. Field dominance is none. I edit the video and then export as quicktime movie using current settings. The Pro Res file says 23.98 when played in quicktime so I know that's good. I simply then drop the file into Toast (10.0.4) and burn blu-ray disc, selecting DVD as the media. I noticed too I need to change the field dominance under the encoding tab in Toast to progressive, as automatic doesn't work. It only burns the top half of the image. Regardless, when I make these discs and play them on PS3, my TV's info says 1080/24p. Maybe my eyes aren't use to seeing 24fps. Does it sound like I am doing anything wrong in my workflow/encoding process.
    Again, good tip on the shutter speed Jerry.

  • Slow motion looking bad

    I have tried to slow a video clip down to 30% speed. It looks smooth when played back in FCE, but when exported to a QT movie, it becomes jerky with brief stuttering of frames.
    I have tried the techniques described in other posts but nothing seems to work. First, I tried it with just frame blending. Then I superimposed a copy of the clip, and used the de-interlace/flicker filters without frame blending.
    The original footage was shot on Super-8 film, transferred to DVD, and converted to DV.
    Any suggestions as to how to make the slowed clip play smooth after exporting would be greatly appreciated.

    Have you tried the Toltzman solution ? It works only for 50% slow down, but it seems to work better than the standard Speed command. Let me quote it from an old post:
    "When you slow down a clip in FCP/FCE, the application does not use the 60 (or 50 in PAL) fields/second of interlaced video, which can help to achieve very smooth 50% speed video.
    Here is a recipe for converting your 60/50 fields per second in to 60/50 frames per second for a nice, smooth slow motion effect at 50% speed.
    Slow motion in FCE using both fields of Interlace video to get smoother slow motion at 50% (uses all 60 fields).
    1) layer two copies of video in timeline over the top of each other.
    2) apply a de-interlace (1) and blink (2) filter to the top copy and set the de-interlace to use the Upper field. Set the Blink filter to an on duration of 1 and an off duration of 1.
    3) apply a de-interlace filter to the bottom copy and set it to Lower field.
    4) Set the speed of each layer to 50% and turn OFF the frame blending.
    The top layer and bottom layer should now be interleaved. The top layer will contain only the upper field (repeated across 2 frames) and the bottom layer will have the lower field (repeated across 2 frames). The Blink filter will switch back and forth between the layers to use all fields as frames.
    If your field dominance is different than NTSC DV, then you'll have to reverse the de-interlace settings on each video layer
    By Douglas Toltzman"
    The result is that each single field (both upper and lower) is repeated twice, while with the standard Speed command only the upper field of each frame is repeated 4 times, and lower fields are discarded.
    Piero

  • Graphics look bad on pause at end of chapters

    I've created a presentation in Keynote that I've exported as a QT movie and imported into DVDSP. Since the presentation will be manually advanced via remote control, I've set infinite pauses at the start of each chapter. My problem is that when the pause occurs, the still graphics look really bad. I realize this probably has more to do with the DVD player itself but I was wondering if anyone has found a work-around for this issue. Thanks in advance.
      Mac OS X (10.4.4)  

    Thanks EJP. I need to keep the transition effects though from Keynote so still images won't work. One thing that is kind of weird though it that the still frame at the end of a track looks fine. Its only the pauses at the chapter markers that the video looks bad.

  • Resizing image and looks bad afterward

    So image manipulation in java is not my bag. I wrote a program to help save me time with my photography, the idea was that I could point it at a directory and then it would read all the files in that folder that are jpgs and resize them to blog ready sizes. This works really well cept the final images that are produced are not of same quality as say when I used GIMP to resize to the same size/aspect ratio the quality is much different. It looks like its a problem with setting my type perhaps to an only 8bit file? Maybe I am wrong, also goofed with the compression stuff (found code online) to turn the compression to 0 (i.e. no compression)...still no avail. Some code I am using:
        public static BufferedImage scaleImage(BufferedImage image, int imageType,
                     int newWidth, int newHeight) {
                 // Make sure the aspect ratio is maintained, so the image is not distorted
                 double aspectRatio = (double) image.getWidth() / (double) image.getHeight();
                  if(newWidth==-1)
                       newWidth=(int)(newHeight * aspectRatio);
                  if(newHeight==-1)
                       newHeight = (int)(newWidth / aspectRatio);
                 // Draw the scaled image
                 BufferedImage newImage = new BufferedImage(newWidth, newHeight,
                         imageType);
                 Graphics2D graphics2D = newImage.createGraphics();
                    //I admit little clue as to what im doing with the rendering hints.
                 Map map = new HashMap();
                 map.put(RenderingHints.KEY_INTERPOLATION,
                 RenderingHints.VALUE_INTERPOLATION_BILINEAR);
                 map.put(RenderingHints.KEY_RENDERING, RenderingHints.VALUE_RENDER_QUALITY);
                 map.put(RenderingHints.KEY_ANTIALIASING, RenderingHints.VALUE_ANTIALIAS_ON);
                 RenderingHints hints = new RenderingHints(map);
                 graphics2D.setRenderingHints(hints);
                 graphics2D.drawImage(image, 0, 0, newWidth, newHeight, null);
                 return newImage;
        then the call to it looks like:
    public BufferedImage processLandScapeImage(BufferedImage img)
                  int width = Integer.valueOf(theHeight.getText()).intValue(); //my desired width
                  return scaleImage(img, BufferedImage.TYPE_INT_RGB, width, -1);
             }So this is close, the files dont look bad but alas... they still aren't the same quality. Should I post a sample of what I get with GIMP and what I get with my little program?
    Thanks to anyone who has some pointers...
    -Shane

    If you don't care about the original source BufferedImage, then you should be able to draw the image onto itself in an incremental fashion. That would avoid the use of intermediate images and consequently not throw the OOM.
    Also note that the code in that article has a slight hiccup. If you specify you want higher quality and targetWidth > w || targetHeight > h, then you'll get an infinite loop. So it needs to be structured slightly different (indeed, the intermediate images should probably be flushed since they're being draw to and from at least once).
    I didn't realize such a task was so non-trivial.If you're not worried about the speed, then I guess the trivial good-result way would be to use Image#getScaledInstance with the area average parameter. It's not so much that it's too slow for normal consumption (it isn't), it's just that the Graphics way is so much faster.
    GIMP probably uses a more sophisticated resampling technique like Lanczos or something.

  • Imported Illustrator type looks bad in Premiere.

    I'm making title cards in Adobe Illustrator CS 4 and importing them into Premiere CS 4. When I render the movie, the type looks like crap. Is there something I can do in Illustrator or Premiere to improve the quality?
    Thanks in advance for the help.
    Jody Radzik

    I use AI quite a bit for the creation of all sorts of Shapes in PS to be used in Pr. In PS, I always use these in an image set up to match my Pr Project, i.e. NTSC 720x480 PAR 0.9. These always look very good, when I Import them as .PSD's into Pr.
    Exactly what workflow have you used between AI, PS and Pr? What are your Pr Project settings, and what are your image dimensions in PS? Can you attach an example of what is looking bad with your PS image containing AI material? Hint: you'll need to do a Save_As JPEG, but do keep the compression down (higher quality # in PS), and then use the little "camera" icon in the middle of the forum editing screen, NOT the Attach Files dialog box at the bottom.
    Good luck,
    Hunt

Maybe you are looking for