LOV in Report limited by :APP_USER

I have a LOV in a tabular form. The LOV is built with this sql query:
select first_name||' '||last_name, id from master where ent_type in (select id from ent_type where trim(upper(description)) like '%STAFF%') and
trim(upper(auth_name)) = :APP_USER;
The tabular form is built on a simple sql statement that obviously pulls the field that this LOV is meant to populate.
If the person logged in is not '%STAFF%' and their auth_name does not match their :APP_USER value, nothing should show in the LOV unless the field is populated, in which case it should show the name of the staff that updated the field. To accomplish this, I assumed I would simply 'Show Extra Values' in the LOV. However, nothing shows up in the select list even if the person logged in is '%STAFF%' and their auth_name matches their :APP_USER, regardless of whether or not the field is populated.
I run the query in the above query in the 'SQL Commands' window and it returns the appropriate values.
What more troubling is that when I use a 'named' LOV, it seems to work fine. Very strange - any explanations?

Slight modification - I have the LOV working but it shows the id number of the '%STAFF%' in the master table when the milestone field is populated and I want it to show the name of the staff member from the master table. Any ideas?
Probably need to manually create a tabular form or is there another solution?

Similar Messages

FSRM report limits using PowerShell

I am following this article:
http://blogs.technet.com/b/filecab/archive/2014/05/20/set-fsrm-storage-report-limits-using-powershell.aspx
I did have this working just fine, but after installing Windows Updates today on a 2012 R2 box this functionality breaks the GUI. Now, any time you try to edit a report you are hit with Event ID 0, 'file server resource manager value is not valid' and a
GUI error of 'Unexpected Error. Value of 1000 is not valid for 'Value'. 'Value' should be between 'Minimum' and 'Maximum'.
The report still runs, but you cannot view in the GUI until you again use PowerShell to decrease the limits back to default.
Any ideas on how to fix? (Other than removing the updates) Seems a recent Windows Update has broken this.

The Windows Update version is the latest available. So if you have a 2012 R2 server and install every available update, that's the level I'm at. It was a recent update that seems to have broken this, I just don't know which one.
The parameter was already set to 1,000 and was working fine. The default is 100, and any value greater than 100 now produces the GUI error.
Newly created reports also produce the same error. I stress that the reports do still run with the value of 1,000 set by PowerShell, it's just the GUI that does not recognise the values set by PowerShell.
Looks like a bug in a recent Windows Update.

Is a subquery in a BO report limited to a max number of records???

Here's my problem:
I recieved an excel sheet with 700 records of customers from a client who wants me to to create a report with specific data for these customers in my Business Objects universe (BO6.5 on SQL Server).
So I created a dataprovider with query 1, i.e. the requested data of customers. Then I created a second dataprovider, query 2, based on 'personal files', i.e. the excel sheet. In query 1 I added to the conditions that each customer should be in (sub)query 2 (CustomerId In list of the query result ('query2.CustomerId').
the syntax I have used for this seems OK.
However, I recieve the following error: "Too many selected values (LOV0001)". I know this error has to do with parameter MAX_INLIST_VALUES, which is limited by default to 99 and can be extended to 256 max. But I thought it refers to the max number of items in lists of values.
When I limit the number of records in the excel sheet to 99 the result is perfect (proof that I got the syntax right!). I can upgrade the parameter to 256, and can split the excel sheet into three, but that will not be useful when next time my client sends me 10.000 customer records.
Can I make reports in BO which use subqueries that result in more than 256 records at all? (hardly imaginable).
What is the best way to do this?
Thanks in advance!

Hi Lucas,
Following is the information regarding the issue you are getting and might help you to resolve the issue.
ADAPT00519195- Too many selected values (LOV0001) - Select Query Result operand
For XIR2 Fixed Details-Rejected as this is by design
I have found that this is a limitation by design and when the values exceed 18000 we get this error in BO.
There is no fix for this issue, as itu2019s by design. The product always behaved in this manner.
Also an ER (ADAPT00754295) for this issue has already been raised.
Unfortunately, we cannot confirm if and when this Enhancement Request will be taken on by the developers.
A dedicated team reviews all ERs on a regular basis for technical and commercial feasibility and whether or not the functionality is consistent with our product direction. Unfortunately we cannot presently advise on a timeframe for the inclusion of any ER to our product suite.
The product group will then review the request and determine whether or not the functionality/feature will be included in a future release.
Currently I can only suggest that you check the release notes in the ReadMe documents of future service packs, as it will be listed there once the ER has been included
The only workaround which I can suggest for now is:
Workaround 1:
Test the issue by keep the value of MAX_Inlist_values parameter to 256 on designer level.
Workaround 2:
The best solution is to combine 'n' queries via a UNION. You should first highlight the first 99 or so entries from the LOV list box and then combine this query with a second one that selects the remaining LOV choices.
Using UNION between queries; which is the only possible workaround
Please do let me know if you have any queries related to the same.
Regards,
Sarbhjeet Kaur

Item(select list) with LOV and Report with link = changed value item

Hello,
On one page I have:
- Item 'P_name' (select list) with LOV to select name of a person;
- Items 'factory' and Report 'factory'(standard created with 'Form with Report' on the same page).
Situation:
All works fine. I selected first a LOV Item 'P_name' (say 'Jane'). But....
Only when I select a record (to change the values) from the report 'factory' then LOV Item 'P_name' become empty. Report used a link to the same page to fill the report items 'factory' and make also the LOV item empty.
Question:
I have made a process that write the name 'Jane' to table.
I see two possibilities:
- LOV Item value => fill the LOV item with 'Jane' from the table before region. Is this possible?
- Report => What is the buttonname of reportlink? I can use this name in the processes.
Thanks Walter!

1) what i meant was for you to test this ridiculously huge LOV outside of htmldb, but it occurred to me last night that you could, in fact, be hitting a limit of ours. after some poking around, i have confirmed that. select list items in htmldb are currently limited to 10,000 rows. this was initially done for performance reasons, but they're now opening up the restriction. if you really need to work with that many rows where the user is allowed to pick from a set of values, consider using a popup item type instead. it'd help your app performance as well (in my test cases, it stank to have to wait for my 10k select list rows to come down to my browser).
2) sorry to not have been more clear about this, but when you set your item's "Source Type" back to "Database Column", you'd have to specify that column in the "Source or value expression" field. also, you can't put a sql query into that "Post Calculation Computation" field. as i said before, "you can take a look at the attribute-level help for that field to see implementation examples."
3) stick with "Always..." for now if you're using our auto-dml process(es)
regards,
raj

UI defaults for LOV on report not working?

Hello,
I have a table called CUSTOMERS and an associated lookup table called DISCOUNT (each customer is associated to a discount level).
I defined a complete set of UI-defaults for CUSTOMERS, containing a LOV-definition for the column DISCOUNT_ID (which is the FK to DISCOUNT).
I specified that DISCOUNT_ID is to be "displayed as text(based on LOV)" as a report default.
APEX (3.1.2) seems to ignore that completely when I create a new report and agree to use the UI defaults.
I always get a column displayed as "standard report column" and no associated LOV.
Am I doing anything wrong?
Strangely, the similar setting for (tabular) form defaults works fine.
Thanks in advance for any hint!
Ingo

Also Nelmaz,
I have just checked OSS notes and found below note helpful to you:
Note 1059465 - CN43N: Dynamic selections for scheduling data of WBS elemnts
Symptom
You cannot use transaction CN43N to create dynamic selections for scheduling data of WBS elements (table PRTE). You can use transaction CNS43 to do so.
Hope this helps.
Please assign points as way to say thanks

Multiple values based on LOV in report

Hi,
I have a checkbox on a form where I can select values like e-mail, fax, post.
And then I have report that has a column for confirmation type that is based on same LOV as the checkbox.
The problem is that wen there is one value selected it shows correctly in report that e-mail for example. But when I have multiple values there it shows P:E only not Post, E-mail as it should. So when there are multiple values it shows only LOV return values not display values.
How can I get it to show display values instead of return values when there are multiple values (Post, E-mail instead of P:E)?
Thank you a lot.

anyone?

Desktop Publisher Scheduled Report Limits

Post Author: bicknell
CA Forum: crystalreports.com
Using the crystalreports.com desktop publisher, a customer scheduled the upload of 80+ reports to crystalreports.com on a dailybasis. Some of the jobs were failing and others seemed like they were being run continuously. There are two significant points to know about the desktop publisher:When the desktop publisher uploads a file to crystalreports.com, the program needs to logon to crystalreports.com using your crystalreports.com user account. The site only allows 10 concurrent logons for the same account at any one time. This effectively limits you to scheduling 10 documents at any one time.If you are refreshing these reports before they are uploaded, the number of concurrent refreshes will be limited by the resources of your computer. It is a fairly expensive process in terms of memory and CPU time, especially if you have a large number of records in each report. We've had another customer report that they could only actually refresh about 10 reports at a time before they started getting failures. This could be a combination of report size/complexity and the processing power of your computer. Note: The ODC and SFDC connector are designed to handle much bigger tasks than the desktop publisher. The desktop publisher is designed for lightweight loads not exceeding 10 connections.

Post Author: norton
CA Forum: crystalreports.com
Hi JD,
I'm not sure about the "unable to connect to the file" error you are seeing. Can you post the exact wording of the error and where you are seeing it? If you can post a screen shot of the error, that would be great. If you change the file name of the rpt on your hard drive, the task won't be able to find it the next time it runs. Could that be the problem?
You should be able to create a task in the desktop publisher, point it to a report and schedule it - at that time, it will prompt you for the db logon and parameter values. Once you have supplied that info, the task will run according to whatever recurrence pattern you have set - daily, weekly, whatever. Each time the task runs, it will try to refresh the rpt file with the db logon and parameter values you specified and upload the rpt file to crystalreports.com.
You should always be able to open the rpt file in Crystal Reports, however I have seen a problem where the rpt file gets corrupted if you run out of disk space when the report is being saved after the refresh. The error we got from this though was that the rpt file had been corrupted. I don't think it complained about not being an rpt file.
Yes, you should be able to use a salesforce.com db connection and you should be able to configure the desktop publisher task to run every 30 minutes.
Yes, if you do edit the rpt file you should see the changes the next time the task runs. We have found problems where you will get an error on uploading to cr.com using the overwrite option if the rpt file has been changed "too much". Most often this only applies to the db connection changing too much. If you are just editing the report layout, that should be fine.
Steve

Dynamic LOV in report based on universe

Hi experts,
I have found the following thread and I understand that I can change the registry to have dynamic LOV for BOXI R2:
http://scn.sap.com/thread/1524666
Is it possible for BI4.1?
Also is it possible for CR4E with .unx source?
Regards,
Gordon

OK. The Path for 4.0 would be:
32-bit machine:
HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\SAP BusinessObjects\Suite XI 4.1\Crystal Reports\Database
64-bit machine:
HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\WOW6432Node\SAP BusinessObjects\Suite XI 4.1\Crystal Reports\Database
And then create the string key per the suggestion in that thread.
-Abhilash

Multi value select LOV in report builder 10g parameter form.

Hi All,
I have a requirement to show a set of records by getting user input through the report parameter form.
employee Table.
emp_id emp_name
1 A
2 B
3 C
4 D
5 E
In the report i am getting emp_id input from the user through list of values (LOV query is "select emp_id from employee where emp_id =:emp_id").
This condition is working for me. now user want to select multiple emp_id from the LOV. so that the sql query will get the related records from the employee table.
so the LOV query will work like the following "select emp_id from employee where emp_id in (:emp_id)".
can enybody help me to acheive the above.
Thanks
Leo.
Edited by: user13359272 on Oct 24, 2012 5:25 AM

By all means feel free to post your question as often as you like!
In webforms DDE runs on the middle tier; it might do what you want against your local OC4J now, but it surely won't open a thing when you run it against an application server.
Maybe you should enlighten us with your requirement, maybe there is a better solution for your problem.
cheers

Report limits for individual tests

Hi All
I have a system under test which I interrogate (via RS232) for embedded hardware and firmware information. The reported response has to be added to the final test report along with all the other specified test cases.
e.g.
Operator: xyz
Date:  xyz
UUT Type: xyz
Serial Number: xyz
PTS 2.1 Embedded H/W (Processor) 12345 version A  12345 version A
PTS 2.1 Embedded H/W (Amplifier)    23456 version B  23456 version B
PTS 2.1 Embedded H/W (Filter)         34567 version c  34567 version c
PTS 2.1 Embedded H/W (Pre-Amp)   45678 version D  45678 version D
PTS 2.2 12V OFF Current                  2.1mA  5  LT
PTS 2.2 12V ON Current                   250mA  300  LT
etc
etc
The only way I can think of to get the information into the main body of the report is to perform a 'String Value' test on it. However I then get the limits displayed in the report as well making the final report look messy. I do need all the limits in the report for the usual test cases e.g. voltages, currents etc so I cannot turn off limit reporting in the configuration report options.
Is there a way to turn OFF the limits reporting for individual test cases?
Regards
IanR

What version of TestStand are you using?
You could change the step to an 'Action' step and put the RS232 string in the report text for the step? It depends on how your report options are setup in your environment. Where I work, we do not put any Action steps in the report just Pass Fail results. Hence you would have to change the Status Expression for your Action step to something other than "Done"....
Otherwise in TestStand 4.0, you can click on the Property Browser view under the Properties Tab. Right Click on the Limits container and select 'Advanced -> Edit Flags'
Within that box there is an option 'Is Limit' checked, perhaps by unchecking this option it will not be put in the report. Although I would NOT do this, because it is difficult for anyone taking over your code ( unless you document you changed this flag ) to see that it is unchecked.
Thanks,
Paul Holzrichter

Inventory canned report limitations

Hi,
does anyone know about limitations regarding ZENworks canned reports?
E.g. the report "microsoft office per machine" stops reliably at a machine
count of 200. The same manual search (searching for the product ID)
returns over 500.
kind regards
Birgit

Bj,
It appears that in the past few days you have not received a response to your posting. That concerns us, and has triggered this automated reply.
Has your problem been resolved? If not, you might try one of the following options:
- Do a search of our knowledgebase at http://support.novell.com/search/kb_index.jsp
- Check all of the other support tools and options available at http://support.novell.com in both the "free product support" and "paid product support" drop down boxes.
- You could also try posting your message again. Make sure it is posted in the correct newsgroup. (http://support.novell.com/forums)
If this is a reply to a duplicate posting, please ignore and accept our apologies and rest assured we will issue a stern reprimand to our posting bot.
Good luck!
Your Novell Product Support Forums Team
http://support.novell.com/forums/

SQL Report Display Error when change LOVs In Report Attribute.

Dear Friend,
i have created SQL Report .Now In Agent Name Column ,Agent_code is Display .
i want to display Agemt Name In to Agent_CODE Column so i have change in Report Attribute-->edit column AGENT_CODE-->Tabular Form Element-->Display As text (Based on LOV,Does not save state) -->List of Values -->Agent_name
Apply Changes .
Then it show me Below Error in Report
report error:
ORA-20001: Error fetching column value: ORA-06502: PL/SQL: numeric or value error: character string buffer too smallHow to resolve it?
Thanks
Edited by: Vedant on Sep 5, 2011 10:06 PM

Dear Jari,
yes i am not using Named LOV ,
i am follow
Report Attribute-->Tabular Form Element-->Display As text (Based on LOV,Does not save state) -->List of Values -->Agent_nameThen Show me Error.
thanks
Edited by: Vedant on Sep 6, 2011 1:37 AM

LOV in Report - can i call a javascript on change?

Hi i have a lov in a report. What i want to do is call a javascript on change of the value?
is this possible?
Many thanks in advance

just the attribute?
under reprt attributes i have a column list and on that i have clickec edit and added a LOV

Multi-Select LOV for Report Parameters

I have a LOV defined in Oracle Portal as a Multi-Select LOV. When I assign this to an optional report parameter when defining a reports definiton file and run the parameter screen, it comes up as a combo box. Is a combo box the only type of LOV I can use for an Oracle Reports Parameter.
Thanks
Jody

With whatever i could make out is you are trying to change a discovere report to xml; publisher report isnt it?
To answe to your question, directly it is not possible to have In clause but you could use some smart logic like lexical parameters etc to achieve similar things.I guess you cannot do in in EBS Reports too.

Problems with popup lov in report in Apex 4.0.2.00.08 XE 11g is a bug?

I had a report in Apex 3.2 in XE 10g. The type of field was popup lov(editable)
i defined a trigger on change to load data from database and fill anothers fields.
to know in wich row change this field i have the nex javascript code
var vRow = pThis.id.substr(pThis.id.indexOf('_')+1);
in this release works fine and return 1 (0001) for the first rows, etc etc
in the new version 4.0.2.00.08 in XE 11g the same code return 0000, but if i put a trigger in a field(column)(editable too) of the same row returns 0001, Is this a bug? or in apex 4 change the ordinal of rows for popup lovs only?
thanks
The current version of apex is 4.0.2.00.08 XE 11g (the release included with the database ) and runs in Windows Vista and internet explorer 8
Edited by: DanielB on Jun 13, 2011 11:52 AM
Edited by: DanielB on Jun 13, 2011 11:57 AM

when i put the mouse over the popup lov in release 3.2 , on the console bar i can see javascript:genList0_f01_0() for the first record and javascript:genList0_f01_1() for the second
in release 4 and 4.1 javascript:genList0_f01_$_row() for the first record and javascript:genList0_f01_1() for the second, i think this is my problem......

LOV in Report limited by :APP_USER

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for