LSMW AND SPECIFIC FIELDS ISSUES

Dear All,
I am using a direct input LSMW (no foreground execution possible) to load a specific field (append in structure BM00) value. The problem is that although this value is being read and converted by LSMW, the field is NOT updated.
Anyboby has a clue how to solve this problem ?
Thanks for the enlightment.
Cheers

Dear Oliver,
Please check whether the particular field (append in structure BM00) value which
you are using in your text file is present in Source Structure & Source Field.
If not clear,please get the help from ABAP'er.
Regards
Mangal

Similar Messages

Sharepoint Site User name,created by and Modified field issue

I am being admin of sharepoint site . I have added a user to my sharepoint site from people and groups(Site Action-->Site Settings-->Users and Permissions-->People and Groups). So Now "Created by" and "Modified by" field should
show My login name(display name) in those fields Right ? But In those field it is showing user name whom I have added to my sharepoint site. I have added user to my site so My display name should be their in "created by" and "modified
by" field. Facing this issue on PROD and UAT.

Hi Rajshekhar,
Actually, the users have been added to the site groups or granted with permissions in Site Permissions, then the users will be added to the User Information List of the site collection.
I recommend to check if the users you added have already been listed in the User Information List.
If yes, then the Created By and Modified By fields have already been filled with other values.
Created By field will show the user name who is the first one to add the user to the site and the Modified By field will show the last one who edit the My Settings of that user.
To access the User Information List, you can type the URL like this:
http://server/_catalogs/users/detail.aspx.
Best regards,
Victoria
TechNet Community Support
Please remember to mark the replies as answers if they help, and unmark the answers if they provide no help. If you have feedback for TechNet Support, contact
[email protected]

Specific field issue

I have an Idoc to File scenario. The Idoc has a field XYZ, the Idoc should be processed only if XYZ =1, if it is 2 then it should not be processed.
Do we specify this condition in mapping ? How do we specify it ?
Should we map this field to a field in target. I don't find a field correspinding to that in the target side
Regards

hi,
Go to the Receiver Determination, in select condition . condition window Editor will open. in that to select left operand , a Expression editor will open, select "XPATH" option, u can see idoc structure there, select XYZ field in that then click ok. Now select operation as "=" and then type "1" as right operand then click ok. Save and activate the interface determination. Then trigger the message
Regards,
Balaji

Reference tanble and ref.field issue about the datasource

Hi all,
I want to create a generic datasource by a database view in R/3.
In the database view, there is one quantity filed which refer to a structure field not a table filed. Then I can not add the structure field into the database view.
How can I do? Can I create the datasource by a query?
many thanks!

Hi Yang,
Provide me your personal email id and I can send you step by step screenshots (Steps for creating an infoset).
Here are the steps:
1. Goto SQ03
2. Create a User Group and assign your user id to it.
3. Goto SQ02
4. Enter a infoset name
5. Assign the infoset to the user group you created in step 2.
6. Now click on Create
7. Select Radio Option "Direct read of table"
8. Specify the table name
9. Save and generate the infoset.
10. goto RSO2 and follow the steps for creating the generic datasource.
11. Specify the Infoset name.
If you have concerns .. let me know.
Best regards,
Kazmi

Digital signature and input fields issue

Hello,
I guess that I found some kind of BUG in forms. If you have a form with two text input fields, one as ID ot the field which is computed, read only (user can not change it) and regular value input text field, and digital signature field at the bottom.
Once you sign the form, you can select on the signature field, what gets locked after signing. If I choose both text fields, they look like a label on the PDF after signing.
What concerns me is once you remove the digital signature, the ID text field becomes edditable by the user, which is a bug in my opinion.
Thanks for any suggestions.
J

I tried this and could not duplicate the behaviour that you reported.
I created a form with two fields and a signature field. The first field I set to "Calculated - Read Only", with the following script on the "Initialize" event,
this.rawValue = "1234";
I created a field collection that included the calculated field and associated it with the signature field. I opened the form, the calculated value appears and is read-only, I filled in the second field and signed the PDF. (Both fields were locked). I cleared the signature field and the original Read Only calculated field remained locked, while the second field was editable again.
I used Designer ES version 8.2.1
Regards
Steve

Customer master Post code and city field Issue

Hi,
I am facing a problem with the customer master, In the address tab postal code N0N 1J2 is giving a default value in the city description tab, However the defaulted value is not the correct one.
Eg. if post code 123 has to display DELHI it displays BOMBAY.
Can you suggest where can i change the defaulted value. Is there a table entry missing that should allow this city / zip code combination? Where are these settings maintained.
Rgds

Hi Prabu,
Check this link it would be helpful to your solution
http://forums.sdn.sap.com/thread.jspa?threadID=1962002
Let me know if your problem is solved
Regards
Pradeep

Issue in Updating Customer specific fields in WBS using BAPI_BUS2054_CREATE_MULTI

Hi Experts,
I am able to create the WBS element using BAPI_BUS2054_CREATE_MULTI.But the issue is i am not able to update customer specific fields even after passing the fields as per specification in Function module documentation. I have also created an implementation of BADI as per below specification in FM documentation:
Procedure for Filling Standard Enhancements
Before you call the BAPI for each object that is to be created or changed,
for which you want to enter customer-specific table enhancement fields, add a
data record to the container ExtensionIn:
STRUCTURE: Name of the corresponding help structure
VALUEPART1: Key of the object + start of the data part
VALUEPART2-4: If required, the continuation of the data part
VALUPART1 to VALUPART4 are therefore filled consecutively, first with the
keys that identify the table rows and then with the values of the
customer-specific fields. By structuring the container in this way, it is
possible to transfer its content with one MOVE command to the structure of the
BAPI table extension.
Note that when objects are changed, all fields of the enhancements are
overwritten (as opposed to the standard fields, where only those fields for
which the respective update indicator is set are changed). Therefore, even if
you only want to change one field, all the fields that you transfer in
ExtensionIn must be filled.
Checks and Further Processing
Using the methods ...CREATE_EXIT1 or. ...CHANGE_EXIT1 of the BAdI
BAPIEXT_BUS2001, BAPIEXT_BUS2002, and BAPIEXT_BUS2054, you can check the entered
values (and/or carry out other checks).
In the BAdI's second method, you can program that the data transferred to the
BAPI is processed further (if you only want to transfer the fields of the CI
includes, no more action is required here).
But still i am unable to update fields though i am able to create WBS with rest of the fields except custom fields.
I am using attached code to achieve this.Do we need to code anything inside method create_exit1 or create_exit2 implementation for BADI or
Please help on priority

Hi Rahul,
First observation from your code is that i could not find the assignment for the field
GWA_WBS_EXTIN-STRUCTURE. I hope you are not filling this field, that could be one reason for failure. Try to do it and let us know if you still have the problem.
Br..
Dwaraka

JSF Table StyleClass issue for a specific Field inside the Table

Hi There,
Am having an issue of dynamically setting the styleClass for a specific field inside a DataTable. Here is how the JSF code is ..
<h:column>
<h:panelGrid id="column4" columns="1" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0">
<h:inputText id="numberOfApps" value="#{row.submitNumber}" styleClass="#{row.customStyleClass}" maxlength="6" converter="MyNumberConverter" />
</h:panelGrid>
</h:column>
This Table has a specific column which has a input Text Box where user enter's data. This data will be validated in the bean where in after the validation if its exceeding a limit we should throw an error message and also highlight the field with a specific styleClass.
I am setting the StyleClass dynamically based on the User Input, so that I can display a highlited Error Field on the screen. Strangely enough, styleclass is getting set as expected for the first submit but doesnt show any styles for further submits. Even the existing style is getting removed from the second submit onwards. I am setting this "customStleClass" dynamic parameter as a Bean Property. Am sure these values are properly set coz to make sure I have put an h:output tag inside that table to display the customStyleClass values and they are getting set as expected but I see blank value for the class="" in the source of the Page.
Any help would be appreciated.
Thanks
Edited by: Lalith on Jan 14, 2008 10:23 AM

One option is you find the data element of that field GUID.
Now go to SE11 transaction and in data type put that data element and press where used list. In that select tables.
This will give you a list of tables where that field is used.
But again if there are lots of them it will be difficult to find.
The only option in that case is debug the extractor and find out.

IDOC mapping issue (calculation using parent and child fields)

We are mapping an IDOC to a file for output to a third party. The IDOC has many segments, some of which are embedded. This is where I'm having the issue. I am trying to perform a calculation on a field from the parent node (E1EDP01-MENGE) with the field from the child node (E1EDP05-KRATE) to determine the total tax for that line (qty X rate).
Issue: The mapping that is in place is using the same MENGE value for all calculations, even where the E1EDP01 segment is not a parent of the E1EDP05 segment.
Please review the screen prints and explain how I can correctly group the E1EDP05 child segments rate field (KRATE) with the corresponding parent segment E1EDP01 quantity (MENGE).
Example:
Parent segment, E1EDP01 / Child segment E1EDP05 (There are many E1EDP05 segments for 1 E1EDP01 segment)
E1EDP01 (parent node)
E1EDP05 (child node)
Target structure
ITEM (parent) --->E1EDP01 is mapped at node level
-->ITEM_DATA --->E1EDP01 is mapped at node level
-->ITEM_TAX --->E1EDP01 is mapped at node level
 -->(fields for item_tax)
 -->Record type
 -->Invoice number
 -->Line total
 -->etc...
I am mapping (E1EDP01-MENGE) for calculation with (E1EDP05-KRATE) to determine tax at the line item level. I have the context set at each Node, E1EDP01 for MENGE and E1EDP05 for KRATE. I was using CopyValue, but this was using the frist occurence of MENGE for all line items.
mapping example
*I am using MENGE (Copy_Value) then multiplying by KRATE to get the line item total. This was causing the same MENGE (because of Copy_Value) for all line items.
E1EDP01-MENGE|Copy_Value|MULT--->TAX_ITEM-LINE_TOTAL
E1EDP05-KRATE|
I removed the CopyValue and now I'm getting the following error:
Cannot produce target element /ns0:MT_DTN_INVOICE1/INVOICE/ITEM/ITEM_TAX[3]/LINE_TOTAL. Check xml instance is valid for source xsd and target-field mapping fulfills requirements of target xsd
How can I map this so the child records (E1EDP05) are grouped with the correct parent records (E1EDP01)?
Thanks in advance!
Michael

Check this blog:
/people/claus.wallacher/blog/2006/04/17/replication-of-nodes-using-the-graphical-mapping-tool
Regards
Stefan

Issue in mapping the same source and target fields

Hi All,
I am working on PI 7.0 and currently I am connecting to PI 7.0 via citrix desktop . Problem here is : in the mapping , direct mapping option that is available to map the same source and target fields is disabled . I do know that this is due to some java version issue .
What I want to know is there any possibilty of solving this issue without installing an updated java version ?
Regards
Vinay P.

I've faced the same for many times and all of that were due to Java version.
1st of all, you have to check the authorizations you have. If you have enough (DEVELOPER_J2EE, CONTENT_ORGANIZER_J2EE, and so), and - obvious but very often forgotten - you have to assure you're trying to change it in the message mapping change mode On.
Then, last shot should be downgrade your Java version.
The 1.4.2 JRE version allow you to use not only the Mapp the Identical field but also Dependencies, Clear Mapping and some other tools/buttons. As mentioned above, if there's a fix in the new Java releases, I do not know (hope so) and would appreciate if you could let us know.
Tks.

Is there a way to sort a PDF file with multiple pages by a specific field within the PDF? All pages have the same invoice format and i would like to sort by a field within and then print the documents. (Vendor, PO

Is there a way to sort a PDF file with multiple pages by a specific field within the PDF? All pages have the same invoice format and i would like to sort by a field within and then print the documents. (Vendor, PO#, Date, ect.)

When you say field, do you mean specifically a form field, such as a text field? Or is the information regular text on the page?

MIRO issue (urgent!), amount and quantity fields are not captured from PO

Hi,
When we try to post thought MIRO using PO as reference, quantity and amount fields are not captured. We do MIGO first and then MIRO.
GR based invoice verification in the vendor master is selected and the check mark GR-based in the PO is selected too.
We're getting this MIRO issue for "all" PO and Service Entry Sheet.
We'll appreciate your recommendation in order to fix this critical issue as soon as possible.
Thanks in advance.

I was looking for copy controls and other functions. Glad this is now resolved. You need to award yourself points!
Cheers.

New material specifi field not appearing in LSMW objects

Dear all,
Within the conversion process, we have to load "Z" specific fields whose values are stored in the MARC table but that are not appearing in the standard LSMW object 0020 - Material master. Is there a specific step or action to be taken (or object to be selected in LSMW) so these fields would appear in the structure ?
Thanks for your answer,
Cheers

Hi Olivier
Standard object 0020 gives fields only available in standard tables MARA , MARC , MBEW, MAKT . I too faced this problem for ML based fields in accounting & costing views ( as these fields are not in MBEW they are in CKMLHD). The said Z field if it does not exist in MARC it cannot be seen through std object. U need to do a saperate recording to upload this field. I dont see any other option to my knowledge.U can up load remaing fields through the std object 0020 & create a saperate recorded LSMW only for this Z field.
regards
prasad
reward if useful

Some symbols gets prefixed to a specific field in validation statement.

Hi All,
I am beginner in SAP MDM and facing an issue in validations in Data Manager. Some symbols gets prefixed to a specific field in validation statement.
Any ideas,in what situation does it happen i.e. due to any repository operation from console etc ?
Regards,
Shivani

Dear Shivani,
Please eleborate when are you getting this and which are the symbols?
Regards,
Pramod

Check double invoice with GL account and Reference field

Dear SAP GURU's,
I am very new to SDN. I have one query.
I know we have the option of control double invoice against Vendor/Customer by using reference field. But here my client is asking that control has to be from GL account and reference field, becoz some times he will receive the shipping bills 3 or 4 times agianst one billing document ( i am booking Transporter Vendor invoice by using FB60) with same bill number but expense GL's will be different most of the times. Some times knowingly or unknowingly same GL Expenditure account will be repeated with the same shipping bill number. This was happend most of the times.
So can i know how can i get the GL account and Reference field checking and error message for the same.
Thanks & Regards,
Shobha.

Dear Shobha,
I feel that having a check on GL is not a good idea. If your client insists you can go for an exit or BTE.
We used BTE to have the same functionality of Logistics for FI documents also in our office.
Duplicate Invoice check process documentation is given below for your ready reference --
with Regards
Check Flag for Double Invoices or Credit Memos
Indicator which means that incoming invoices and credit memos are checked for double entries at the time of entry.
Use
Checking Logistics documents
Firstly, the system checks whether the invoice documents have already been entered in the Logistics invoice verification; the system checks invoices that are incorrect, or invoices that were entered for invoice verification in the background.
Checking FI documents
The system then checks whether there are FI or Accounting documents that were created with the original invoice verification or the Logistics verification, and where the relevant criteria are the same.
Checking Logistics documents
In checking for duplicate invoices, the system compares the following characteristics by default:
Vendor
Currency
Company code
Gross amount of the invoice
Reference document number
Invoice document date
If all of these characteristics are the same, the system issues a message that you can customize.
When you enter credit memos or subsequent adjustments, the system does not check for duplicate invoices.
Exception: Country-specific solution for Argentina, where invoices and credit memos are checked for duplicate documents.
No message is issued if you enter a document that has previously been reversed.
Dependencies
The system only checks for duplicate invoices in Materials Management if you enter the reference document number upon entering the invoice.
In Customizing for the Logistics invoice verification, you can specify that the following characteristics should not be checked:
Reference document number
Invoice document date
Company code
This means that you can increase the likelihood that the system will find a duplicate invoice, because you can reduce the number of characteristics checked.
Example
The following document has already been entered and posted:
Reference document number: 333
Invoice date: 04/28/00
Gross invoice amount: 100.00
Currency: EUR
Vendor: Spencer
Company code: Munich
You have made the following settings in Customizing:
The field "Reference document number" and "Company code" are deselected, which means that these characteristics will not be checked.
Now you enter the following document:
Reference document number: 334
Invoice date: 04/28/00
Gross invoice amount: 100.00
Currency: EUR
Vendor: Spencer
Company code: Berlin
Result
Because you entered a reference document when you entered the invoice, the system checks for duplicate invoices.
The reference document number and the company code are different from the invoice entered earlier, but these characteristics are not checked due to the settings you have made in Customizing.
All other characteristics are the same. As a result, the system issues a message that a duplicate entry has been made.
If the "Reference document number" had been selected in Customizing, the system would have checked the document and discovered that it was different from the invoice entered earlier, so it would not have issued a message.
Checking FI documents
Depending on the entry in the field "Reference", one of the following checks is carried out:
1. If a reference number was specified in the sequential invoice/credit memo, the system checks whether an invoice/credit memo has been posted where all the following attributes agree:
Company code
Vendor
Currency
Document date
Reference number
2. If no reference number was specified in the sequential invoice/credit memo, the system checks whether an invoice/credit memo has been posted where all the following attributes agree:
Company code
Vendor
Currency
Document date
Amount in document currency

LSMW AND SPECIFIC FIELDS ISSUES

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for