Maint.order settlement

Dear SAP Gurus...
I have problem in settlement of maint. order, In cost tab i have both the planned & actual cost, settlement rule is created but when I settle the order "Message no. KD213" : "Either the sender is already settled, or there is nothing to settle" error is coiming. can you plz tell me what are other factors to settle the maint. order...
Thanx in advance...
vin...

Hi Vin,
You should have planned some material for the order and check whether the material reserved under Reservation Number,had been issued against the order.
Regards,
Santhosh

Similar Messages

  • Defalult settlement tule in maint order......

    hi all pm expert,
    i am making maont order of tech object functional loc.but when i am clicking on settlement rule with default, all field is comong blank whereas in equipment maint order , default cost center is coming.
    what may be the probable reason.
    regards,
    santosh

    Dear Santosh,
    Settlement rule will be visible depending upon your setting in customizing setting of settlement rule creation.
    Check your order whether it is released. If not release it then check.
    Plant Maintenance and Customer Service>Maintenance and Service Processing>Functions and Settings for Order Types>Settlement Rule: Define Time and Creation of Distribution Rule
    Regards,.
    Kaushal Rai
    Edited by: Kaushal Rai on Sep 10, 2008 10:08 AM

  • Maint order without tech obj

    Hi,
    In Maint order i've not added any Equipment. Only operation with man hrs & Workctr.
    In work ctr I maintained Cost ctr with act type. But while releasing the order system
    takes me to settlement rule scrn& asks to fill in details.
    If I create Maint order against any Eq then while releasing system creates sett rule automatically.
    Why this happens w/o Eq.....eventhough i maintained cost ctr in Work ctr.
    Ashok Malhotra kumar

    Hi,
    1.  For example if I create an order in Feb say 02 period & settles in April 04 period
    In K088 in period fld i've to mention as 02 or 04?.....
    Ans - If distribution rule is PER and cost you have incurred in 02 then you need to give period as 02.Reason is that system will pick up cost only for mentioned settlement period and settles only those.If there is no cost in period 04 and you give settlement period as 04 then system will not find any cost for period 04 to settle and will give message that nothing to settle.So system will first check for type of PER..then will check if any cost exists from settlement period given..if finds then settlees for that period only.this will happen with auto processing type.
    2. If i go for PER settlement then how system considers & If is go for FUL then how system behaves....
    Ans -If you maintain both PER and FUL - then system will first do for PER as above.After this if system finds any cost still as balance on order for previous periods then FUL rule will be used .With Full settlement type system first settles for settlement period as per 1 above like PER.Then if finds balance cost for settlement for all previous periods then that cumulative will be settled to settlement period given.These 2 steps happens in single processing but internally they are first as per PER and then final cumulative settlement for balance.
    Hope I clarified all.
    For quantities,settled quantities like hours will be available in reports.
    regds,
    atul

  • Val. category description - blank under costing tab in maint. order

    Hi,
    For maint. order IW32 under costing tab,  we are getting val. category description as blank with planned costs, actual costs with some values.
    However under the same tab internal  labor costs planned and actual costs are shown as zero.
    What needs to be done for correct labor costs.
    Thanks.
    Anirudh,

    Hello,
    Please Check & Do the setting in SPRO for the Below Nodes
    Plant Maintenance and Customer Service -> Maintenance and Service Processing -> Basic Settings -> General Order Settlement -> Maintain Allocation Structure
    Plant Maintenance and Customer Service -> Maintenance and Service Processing -> Basic Settings -> Settings for Display of Costs -> Maintain Value Categories
    Plant Maintenance and Customer Service -> Maintenance and Service Orders -> Functions and Setting for Order Types -> Costing Data for Maintenance and Service Orders -> Assign Costing Parameters and Results Analysis Keys
    Plant Maintenance and Customer Service -> Maintenance and Service Processing -> Basic Settings -> General Order Settlement -> Maintain Settlement Profile
    Regards,
    Rakesh

  • Sales Order Settlement to Only WBS

    Hi,
    I have scenario like Sales Order Settlement to only WBS in make to order.
    Again from WBS settlement to COPA.
    So far I know WBS settlement to COPA and I am not sure in the 1 st scenario.
    Can you any body tell me where I need to configure, is it only settlement profile or any other settings required?
    Thanks & Regards,
    KBR

    Hi,
    What is the business rational to have a 2 step settlement to COPA?
    Thank you and Regards,
    Varshal Kachole

  • KO8G open work order settlement

    Hi,
    I am facing an issue with open work order settlement using KO8G or KO88.
    We are on 6.0 and PSM turned and New GL activated with a document splitting on fund mandatory flag turned on.
    When open work orders undergo WIP calculation through KKAI, it shows the the calculated amount in the GL account but when we execute KO88 or KO8G to settle this open work order amount to the GL, it gives me the below error
    GLT2201 "Balancing field "Fund" in line item 001 not filled"
    On debugging the KO88, its seen that the field fund does not flow in from the work order.
    This means that both my P&L accounts and my balance sheet accounts that offset the WIP posting does not have the fund field (which is a mandatory field for posting any document in the system).
    Has anyone come across such a situation?
    Any help would be appreciated.
    Thanks,
    Pradeep
    Edited by: Pradeep Giri on May 30, 2009 4:07 AM

    Hey Vanessa,
    Sorry i have been really busy with work off late. I just got a moment and wanted to thank you for the help.
    I found a solution for it, we had FMDERIVE default the fund on the accounts used in WIP settlement as they are dedicated for those process.
    The cost is picked from the order and deposited on the P&L account which is now attached to the fund and this is further transferred to the balance sheet account with the fund information.
    Problem solved.
    Do you see any other implications on this?
    Thanks again.
    Pradeep

  • Open Work Order settlement - KO8G or KO88

    Hi,
    I am facing an issue with open work order settlement using KO8G or KO88.
    We are on 6.0 and PSM turned and New GL activated with a document splitting on fund mandatory flag turned on.
    When open work orders undergo WIP calculation through KKAI, it shows the the calculated amount in the GL account but when we execute KO88 or KO8G to settle this open work order amount to the GL, it gives me the below error
    GLT2201 "Balancing field "Fund" in line item 001 not filled"
    On debugging the KO88, its seen that the field fund does not flow in from the work order.
    This means that both my P&L accounts and my balance sheet accounts that offset the WIP posting does not have the fund field (which is a mandatory field for posting any document in the system).
    Has anyone come across such a situation?
    Any help would be appreciated.
    Thanks,
    Pradeep

    Ashok,
    Thanks for the reply.
    We have a user exit to populate the order during its creation. this means the fund field is already residing on the order. so during settlement process, closed orders dont have a problem but when open orders are subject to settlement i.e WIP settlement, the cost on the order is not transferred to the GL account because of the fund missing as our financial statements should be balances by fund.
    Do you think an user exit can suffice this ? have you ever tried or come across such a scenario.
    Thanks
    Pradeep

  • Using a different Sender GL in Internal Order Settlement

    When we settle an Internal Order from GL/Cost Element 1 to Fixed Assets, we get:
    Dr: Fixed Asset
    Cr: GL/Cost Element 1.
    For various reasons, we do not want to Credit the original GL/Cost Element but rather another one.
    Does anyone have any sugestions as to how this can be achieved?
    Thanks.

    Hi
    Can you tell me what is meant by "Internal Order from GL/Cost Element.."? 
    As per the functionality, when you settle an internal order, something is moved from the intrnal order and put to another.  Hence the place from where it is moved is credited and the receiver is debited.  The internal order has postings through the cost element you have posted.  So the movement is from what the internal order has in its account. 
    Order settlement is done through a secondary cost element created and this cost element is used for debiting and crediting the sender and receivers.  Hence your idea of using a totally different GL/Cost element (of course that do not have postings with respect fo the internal order in question) is not practical, I hope.

  • For internal order settlement rule amount column is requied instead %

    Hi Gurus,
    For internal order settlement rule percentage is there but business wants  to settle from AUC to final asset by amount wise how can we do this.
    I tried to change the investment profile but it is coming amount field while saving it is not displaying.
    Please help in this regard
    Thank you.
    Ranganadh

    Hi
    Check the path
    IMG>Controlling>Internal Orders>Actual Posting>Settlement>Maintain Settlement Profile>Maintain Settlement Profile.
    Here there is a tick for amount settlement under Indicators. You need to maintain this check box for your requirements.
    Regards
    Sanil Bhandari

  • Error while doing production order settlement

    Hi frds,
    When I am doing the production order settlement, I am getting the following error
    " There are no accrued amounts; settlement is not possible".
    The status of the order is TECO CNF DLV PRC BASC BCRQ GMPS MANC.
    Rajnish

    Rajnish,
    Please check if there is cost balance for the order, to me it looks like the order is already settled. In the order display mode (CO03) menu bar Goto->Costs->Balance.
    If balance exists then the problem may be related to the settlement period used in the Intial screen of transaction KO88. Please check the cost incured period and use the same period as settlement period.
    Regards,
    Prasobh

  • Production order settlement in case of non valuated material

    Hello guys,
        Our client wants some of the materials have to be non valuated. These materials are raw materials and SFG also. We can assign UNBW material types to those materials.
       I have created one material for test purpose. It doesn't contain the accounting view so as no valuation class. BOM of it , doesn't contain any component as client doesn't want to show any consumption on production order.While creating the order for that material system asks for the settlement rule. I skip that step and create the order. I do GR for the same.
      My question is, is production order settlement essential for these orders? What if we don't settle the order. No activity type has been assign to the work center.
      Kindly give ur valuable inputs.

    Hi,
    No need to create material as UNBW type.
    Normal ROH, HALB, FERT material type we can achieve this.
    In the BOM of FG or SFG goto  item detail screen there is a tick mark in costing.
    Remove the tick by OS23 - BOM status.
    Now you can do your production as regular. But cost will not get update.You can do regular settlement also.
    Regards,
    Dharma

  • Re: Issue while doing Order Settlement

    Hi Experts,
    I have completed the goods reciept step for a process order.
    Now I am trying to do the following steps for the order settlement.
    1.Calculate Overheads using Tcode : KGI2 - Individual Processing
    CO43 - Collective Processing
    2.Calculate WIP using Tcode : KKAX - Individual Processing
    KKAO - Collective Processing
    3.Calculate Variance by using Tcode : KKS2 - Individual Processing
    KKS1 - Collective Processing
    4.Finally do the settlement of Order in Tcode : KO88 - Individual Processing
    CO88 - Collective Processing
    I am not able to do these steps.
    KGI2: the screen is appearing  without any details,but there is no error message.
    KKS2: Here all the cost are coming zero.
    KO88: I am getting this message: There are no accrued amounts; settlement is not possible.
    Please advice.
    Regards,
    Vivek

    Dear,
    Message no KD256??
    You will just check for customization settings for accrual calculation ie cheak for settelement to fiin the result analysis version and check posting rules
    Maintain the config in OKG8 for RA category "RUCR".
    Check this OSS note 179533
    Also check order previously settled?
    Regards,
    R.Brahmankar

  • CCS Details are not getting updated to COPA in Sales Order Settlement(VA88)

    Dear Experts,
    Our scenario is MTO with valuated material.
    1. Production order is tagged to Sales Order.
    2. Production order is settled to Material and variance is getting posted to COPA.
    3. At the time of Delivery, COGS Debit (Cost Object- Sales Order), Credit - Inventory.
    4. At the time of Billing, Accounting Document is getting generated, COPA document is not getting generated.
    5. We  are not executing WIP. (as per Business process)
    6. Settlement is done thru transaction code VA88. COPA Document is getting generated.
    I am facing the following issues in the above MTO process.
    1. At time of sales order settlement thru VA88, In COPA, only COGS is getting as updated with one value field i.e. Material Cost.  Cost Component data (Material Depreciation, Labor etc..) is not getting updated to COPA.
    2. When I settle the Sales Order thru VA88, Billing Quantity is not getting updated to COPA though Quantity field mapping is done properly.
    Please help me how to resolve the above issues.
    Note: Same Cost Component Structure, we are using for Make to Stock scenario. Cost Component Data is getting updated Properly to COPA  (at the time of Billing)
    Regards,
    vgl
    Edited by: vglokam on Aug 31, 2010 10:52 AM
    Edited by: vglokam on Aug 31, 2010 10:54 AM

    Hi
    1. CCS (Cost Comp Split) wont be updated to COPA if you settle via sale order.. In sale order, COGS cost element is posted.. the same will get settled to COPA as one single value...
    In MTS, the CCS gets updated to COPA upon billing because of the "valuation" strategy customization... Billing posts to COPA in that case, COPA gets Sales Qty and it is valuated with CCS to give you the break up.. But, in your case, Billing is not posting to COPA, but to sales order.. hence, there is no qty flow into COPA upon billing.. thats why you dont get CCS for MTO
    2. The sales qty should be updated to COPA upon VA88.. For this, make the following settings in your PA transfer structure which is used during VA88
    1. Go to KEI1, Select your PA transfer structure...
    2. Add an assignment line in it... Check on "Qty Billed/Delivered" in the assignment line
    3. In the Tab "Value Field" below "source", assign Qty Field
    Now when you settle, it should update qty as well
    regards
    Ajay M

  • PM Order settlements - Difference between the amounts settled

    Hi All,
    This is regarding the PM Order settlements.
    Every month end finance team run KO8G and settle the PM Order costs for that period (month). In the process the Orders are settled using a variant, which captures all the orders that has changed/created during the focused period.
    But in the report S_ALR_87013015 - List: Actual Debit/Credit there are balances for previous settlements and thereu2019s a difference between the amount settled and the debit/credit amounts.
    When drilling gown we found that this is due to following reasons,
    1.     Some orders are not settled fully.
    2.     Equipments issued against a Order are returned after the settlement process
    Ex: one Order has settled in Oct 2008 initially and fully in Jan 2009. However one material has been returned to stores in February 2009. Therefore a difference (cost of the material) between total actual cost (Dr Amount) and settled amount has been arisen.
    The Orders of nature 1 will be captured and settled in the subsequent run of KO8G.
    But my question is how can we address the orders of nature 2? Changing the settlement variant is one option.
    Also appreciate if someone can explain the SAP-best practice of PM-Order settlements.
    Thanks,
    Thushantha.

    Hi Thushantha,
    After returning the material to store check the actual cost of maintenance order. Once you fully settle the order means it becomes zero.
    When you will return material to warehouse against maintenance order once again carry out settlement of maintenanc order then check for your nature 2.
    Sundar

  • Assiging wbs element as settlment receiver in service order settlement

    Hi PM CS Experts.
    We are using scenarios of creation of service order from sales order. So whatever cost we incurred for service order settling to sales order via settlement rule - settlment receiver is Sales order i.e. SDI. We are using settlement profie XX which have default object type for settling SDI.   While releasing the service order the settlement rule created with settlement receiver is SDI.
    Now for different business scenarios, we are settling service order cost to WBS. Now we want to create a settlemetn rule for WBS, settlement receiver will be WBS element,  while saving the service order.  What configuration, master data or processes we have to follow for this.
    please reply on this.
    regards
    abhay

    Sales Order line item have account assignment WBS element. From this sales order line, a service order will be created.   So our idea is whatever cost booked to service order should be settled to wbs element instead of sales order.  
    also in location tab of service order, the wbs element from sales order is not inherrited in account assignment section.  Why this we are not knowing. Have you have any idea for this.
    regards
    abhay

Maybe you are looking for