Defalult settlement tule in maint order......

hi all pm expert,
i am making maont order of tech object functional loc.but when i am clicking on settlement rule with default, all field is comong blank whereas in equipment maint order , default cost center is coming.
what may be the probable reason.
regards,
santosh

Dear Santosh,
Settlement rule will be visible depending upon your setting in customizing setting of settlement rule creation.
Check your order whether it is released. If not release it then check.
Plant Maintenance and Customer Service>Maintenance and Service Processing>Functions and Settings for Order Types>Settlement Rule: Define Time and Creation of Distribution Rule
Regards,.
Kaushal Rai
Edited by: Kaushal Rai on Sep 10, 2008 10:08 AM

Similar Messages

Maint.order settlement

Dear SAP Gurus...
I have problem in settlement of maint. order, In cost tab i have both the planned & actual cost, settlement rule is created but when I settle the order "Message no. KD213" : "Either the sender is already settled, or there is nothing to settle" error is coiming. can you plz tell me what are other factors to settle the maint. order...
Thanx in advance...
vin...

Hi Vin,
You should have planned some material for the order and check whether the material reserved under Reservation Number,had been issued against the order.
Regards,
Santhosh

Maint order without tech obj

Hi,
In Maint order i've not added any Equipment. Only operation with man hrs & Workctr.
In work ctr I maintained Cost ctr with act type. But while releasing the order system
takes me to settlement rule scrn& asks to fill in details.
If I create Maint order against any Eq then while releasing system creates sett rule automatically.
Why this happens w/o Eq.....eventhough i maintained cost ctr in Work ctr.
Ashok Malhotra kumar

Hi,
1. For example if I create an order in Feb say 02 period & settles in April 04 period
In K088 in period fld i've to mention as 02 or 04?.....
Ans - If distribution rule is PER and cost you have incurred in 02 then you need to give period as 02.Reason is that system will pick up cost only for mentioned settlement period and settles only those.If there is no cost in period 04 and you give settlement period as 04 then system will not find any cost for period 04 to settle and will give message that nothing to settle.So system will first check for type of PER..then will check if any cost exists from settlement period given..if finds then settlees for that period only.this will happen with auto processing type.
2. If i go for PER settlement then how system considers & If is go for FUL then how system behaves....
Ans -If you maintain both PER and FUL - then system will first do for PER as above.After this if system finds any cost still as balance on order for previous periods then FUL rule will be used .With Full settlement type system first settles for settlement period as per 1 above like PER.Then if finds balance cost for settlement for all previous periods then that cumulative will be settled to settlement period given.These 2 steps happens in single processing but internally they are first as per PER and then final cumulative settlement for balance.
Hope I clarified all.
For quantities,settled quantities like hours will be available in reports.
regds,
atul

Settlement rule in maintenance orders

Dear Gurus;
How can I create a default settlement rule for order types? e.g. I want to have settlement receiver as XYZ, with 100% settlement to cost center for maintenance order type PM01.
Points assured.
Thanks & Regards
Hemant

dear PM master,
i have same question here, can anyone solve this issue/requirement?
if i got to set-up default settlement rule by Work Order type is a standard functionality, but my company implement new accounting that a major repair overhaul and Turn around (major maintenance, with a huge cost), must be settle to a deferred cost (i.e. WBS or ETC).
in My company business configuration, Work Order Turn around and Overhaul covered by maintenance activity type, which are linked by same WO type (preventive maintenance):
WO type:
PM02 (preventive maintenance), consists:
Mtc. Act Type:
001 (Turn around)
002 (Overhaul)
003 (Time Based)
004 (condition based)
005 (Plant Stop)
Now i want to default the settlement rule, in that PM02 order type which is within maint act type '001' or '002' to WBS or other costing receiver. when others maintenance act type remain same (defaulted by configuration in settlement rule profile in WO type)...
please do me a favour.
thanks
Please open a thread for your specific query
Edited by: Paul Meehan on Mar 14, 2011 9:11 AM

Val. category description - blank under costing tab in maint. order

Hi,
For maint. order IW32 under costing tab, we are getting val. category description as blank with planned costs, actual costs with some values.
However under the same tab internal labor costs planned and actual costs are shown as zero.
What needs to be done for correct labor costs.
Thanks.
Anirudh,

Hello,
Please Check & Do the setting in SPRO for the Below Nodes
Plant Maintenance and Customer Service -> Maintenance and Service Processing -> Basic Settings -> General Order Settlement -> Maintain Allocation Structure
Plant Maintenance and Customer Service -> Maintenance and Service Processing -> Basic Settings -> Settings for Display of Costs -> Maintain Value Categories
Plant Maintenance and Customer Service -> Maintenance and Service Orders -> Functions and Setting for Order Types -> Costing Data for Maintenance and Service Orders -> Assign Costing Parameters and Results Analysis Keys
Plant Maintenance and Customer Service -> Maintenance and Service Processing -> Basic Settings -> General Order Settlement -> Maintain Settlement Profile
Regards,
Rakesh

Settlement Rule for Internal Order

Hi All
I have Maintained Settlement rule for Internal order as under
CAT - FXA
Settlement Receiver - Asset
% - 100
Settlement type - Full
Now after settlement of above Order in KO88 . I want again use above internal order. Hence i have trying to put Settlement rule 50% for some anther asset but system gave me following error. Please guide on this issue.
Total = 50.00%, ( Set.Type PER / Version / Actual settlement ), period 010/2011
Message no. KD042
Diagnosis
You have entered distribution rules which settle 50.00% in total. This applies for settlement view ( Set.Type PER / Version / Actual settlement ) in period 010/2011.
When checking the percentage total, the system found one of the following errors:
The total percentage for the distribution rules is more than 100%
The total percentage for the distribution rules is less than 100% and this is a rule for full settlement.
The total percentage for the distribution rules is less than 100% and the 100% check is switched on in the settlement profile.

Hi:
        Please refer to the contents of OSS Note 45612 - IM: pre-settlement does not work, or KD042... which states
"Symptom
    1. If a preliminary settlement rule (for example, to cost center) is entered for individual items of capital investment measures with line item management, this rule is not considered during periodic settlement. There is no settlement to cost centers.
    2. If you enter a final settlement rule for individual line items of investment measures with line item management for a partial capitalization (that is, the percentage rate is less than 100%), then you receive the unjustified error message KD042 "Total percent = xx%".
Additional key words
KOB5, CJ70, CJ88, CJ8G, KO88, KO8G, preliminary settlement, partial settlement, partial capitalization
Cause and prerequisites
    1. You did not enter the settlement type ACT in the preliminary settlement rule.
    You can check this in the Line Item Apportionment transaction by choosing the menu option "Goto" -> "Overview dist. rules" to display the distribution rule groups entered so far.
    The system displays rules which have no entry in the "SetTyp" field (settlement type, field name PERBZ).
    2. The check of the percentages is incorrect.
Solution
    1. Install the following correction. Afterwards reverse the incorrect settlement, re-enter the preliminary settlement rule and settle again.
    2. Install the following correction. Afterwards, you can maintain the settlement rule for the partial settlement.
    Note: If you want to use a default settlement rule (maintaining the settlement rule from the master data maintenance transaction), then you are required to distribute the line items at 100%. In order to carry out a partial capitalization (settlement of less than 100%), you have to use menu path "Actual postings -> Period-end closing -> Settlement -> Line item "
Regards

Error-M2O-Settlement rule for assembly order for item...could not be genera

Hi,
When I am creating Sales Order (VA01) for M2O, I am able to do the costing and copy the EK02 condition type. I have verified the the incompletion log, it indicates that document is complete.
But while saving the sales order, the below error message is displaed:
Settlement rule for assembly order for item 000010 could not be generated. Should the order still be saved?
                Yes/No
1. If No is choosen the following error message is displayed
       Error when processing Production order
      Error when processing Production order
      Message no. V1380
      Diagnosis
        A technical error has occurred. On calling up the assembly interface, exception 5 was triggered. The exceptions have the following meanings:
1 = External block, 2 = General error, 3 = Insufficient data for the interface, 4 = Order was not found, 5 = Update has been rejected, 6 = Final document number for Production order is not issued. Procedure: Inform your system administrator.
2. If Yes is choosen, it is creating Production Order without settlement rule. Able to perform GI & Gr. If I try to enter settelement rule (Settlement receiver SDI - Sales document item) in production order (CO02), the belwo error message is displayed
"Distribution rule for Sales document item can only be created automatically Message no. KD063"
We are using the requierement class with below details:
Reqmts class: ZSO- for M2O
AAC = E, Valuation = A, Settlement profile =SD1, RAKey = 000004, Assembly type = 3.
Settlement profile contain:
Allocation structure, PA structure, Default object type = SDI. Valid receivers: Optional -Sales Order / Prof. seg.
If I make the Valuation field as blank in Reqmts class, there is no error while creating Sales order. And also Settelemnt rule with sales document item as receiver is successfully creating for the production order. Since the Valuation is blank in requirement class, it is Non valuated Sales order stock. All GIs & GR are non valuated
The business requirement is it should be valuated sales order stock and the production varinaces has to be settled to Sales order. Then Sales order has to be settled to COPA.
Need your valuable inputs to meet this requirement.
Let me know if you need any further details.
Thanks in advance.
Regards,
ADI

Dear SAP PP Consultant ,
What is the strategy group you are maintained in the material master ?

New settlement parameters in   sales order does not work

Hi
I have a    sales order for service material.    It is invoiced.    I have to settle it.    The existing settlement rule is wrong. So I have created a new allocation structure and   changed   settlement parameter in     the sales order.   I save the sales order.
But in VA88 the settlement does not work. I get error message ' receiver cost element not defined and thet cat. PSG not defined.'
But the same allocation structure work good for new sales order.
Pl advise how I can do the settlement for old   sales orders, subsequently changed for settlement parameter ie allocation structure.
Thanks
kamala

Hello Kamala
Not an expert on this subject, but here is what I suggest, Try and see if it works.
1) Firstly retract the changes you did in sales order and settle first with the wrong settlement parameter (Old data).
2) Now change the existing allocation structure, don't create NEW ONE. If you change an allocation structure, the changes only affect future settlements.
3) Then reverse the settlement.
4) Now re-do the settlement.
Let me know how it goes. Take care.

Automatic Generation of Settlement Rules for PM order

Hi All,
I am doing a maintenance orders settlement and I have the fallowing issue:
My client has 2 types of equipment, namely vehicles and industrial equipment. Both have particular rules.
For vehicles, we need to control all cost by an internal order
Industrial equipment costs will be control by cost center.
So, cost center is maintained for industrial equipment, and Settlement Order for vehicle equipment.
I have a unique order type for which in Settlement profile I have entered Order and Cost Center as 'Settlement Optional' and default object type as CTR.
When I create a PM order for vehicle, system cannot generate automatically the settlement rule, because in order type I have entered default object type as CTR and in equipment I just have the Settlement Order.
But if I create a PM order for industrial equipment system create automatically the settlement rule, because cost center is maintained for industrial equipment and order type has default object type as CTR.
In the allocation structure I have a receiver category for CTR and ORD.
So, Could you help me how to generate automatically settlement rule for both cases without 2 order types?
Thanks & regards,
Hélder Nunes

hi
i think it is not possible to generate settlement rule based on equipment ,if you have specified the default settlement category in IMG ,it will be generated .
check with your technical team whether user exit IWO10027 can be mapped
regards
thyagarajan

Internal order settle to another internal order

dear all,
for internal order group have 2 order,and i want to settle by hierachy:
A order settle to B order,then B order settle to GL account, how to config the settlement rule for
this 2 orders?
this purpose is to simulate PS WBS/activity if internal order can be collect cost then settle to a final GL acct..

maybe i have make more detail for my question:
a order group contain internal order A/B,and order B under A like follow structure:
order group
- order A
-- order B
order A have plan/actual revenue/cost
order B only have plan cost
the settlement is try to settle order group: as my RA key is set as POC way to calculate revenue/cost,
the formula of POC = actual cost / plan cost * plan revenue
so i want the settle result of this group = actual cost of A / plan cost of A+B * plan revenue of A
now the settle result = actual cost of A / plan cost of A * plan revenue of A,not include plan cost of B
how to make it possible?

TX CNS41 - settled cost from internal order to WBS element not displayed

Hi PS Expets,
I have a question regarding transaction CNS41 "Structure Overview" where cost settled from an internal order is not displayed in in the report for a selected project. This is in a ECC version 5.0
Settled costs from internal orders are posted with transaction type KOAO on WBS elements and when you check report RCNSTFCO you can see that the following transaction types are deselected when executing transaction CNS41:
delete t_rpsco_m where vorga = 'KOAO' "<   insert
                      or vorga = 'KOAL' "<   insert
                      or vorga = 'KOAP' "<   insert
                      or vorga = 'KOAQ' "<   insert
                      or vorga = 'KOAR'."<   insert
CALL FUNCTION 'HFPM_RPSCO_TO_RPSCO_LIS_CONV'
This is implemented according to OSS note 51971 in order to eliminate internal business volume in the project structure when executing a PS hierarchy report.
But this also eliminate the display of the cost from the internal order.
Any ideas or a work around in order to display settled cost from an internal order on a WBS element in transaction CNS41
Kind regards,
Anne

Hello Tison.
I guess you have the Project created with a BAPI in your system in background. As far as I have seen I'd try the following in ABAP to create Partners in the Project Definition: BAPI_BUS2001_PARTNER_CREATE_M or the corresponding method ProjectDefinitionPI.PartnerCreateMultiple. This should happen in background when the Project is created also.
Best regards.
Jens Schmid

Standard Report for maint order, PR,PO,services

Hi all,
Is there any standard report in PM where i can find Maintenance order number,Purchase Requisition no., Purchase order no. and the services taken in the maint. order.
If such a report is not there, pls tell me the logic to create it.
Thanks
Sabyasachi Banerjee

Hi.
Please find below tables for your logic
Technical Objects -
> IFLO,ITOB, EQUI
Maint Orders----
> AUFK,AFVV,AUFM,AFPOAFVC
Reservation & Conf----
>RESB,AFRU,REUCK
Materila Document -
>MSEG,
PR----
>EBAN,EBKN
PO----
>EKPO,EKKO
SES----
>ESSR
Ramesh

Maint. order deletion

dear sir
how i can delete a maint. order permanenetely , what is the diffrenece between LOCK & DELETION FLAG.
thanks
rahul

Hi,
If you LOCK an order then you cannot make any further changes to it.
But if you put a DELETION FLAG to an order then it is marked for deletion.
The duration after which it will be permanently deleted, depends on the customising setting for Order Types where you set the Residence Times( 1& 2). This setting can be made in T Code "OIOA" in fields "Residence Time 1" and "Residence Time 2".
"Reorganizing an object (e.g. order, project) normally requires three steps:
1. Setting the delete flag (can be reset)
2. Setting the final deletion indicator (cannot be reset)
3. Reorganizing (writing the object to a sequential dataset and physically deleting it from the system)
Residence time 1 determines the time interval (in calendar months) that must elapse between setting the delete flag (step 1) and setting the deletion indicator (step 2).
Residence time 2 determines the time (in calendar months) that must elapse between setting the deletion indicator (step 2) and reorganizing the object (step 3)."
Thankyou,
Amit.

Settle part of production order to cost center

When settling a production order, the balance of some accounts in the production order should be settled to a certain cost center (the rest of the order balance settle to material). The requirement is to settle the balance amount while settlement rule in a production order only allows settle by percentage or amount. Please let me know if there is any solution. Thanks~

Hi Sharon
I dont know if this would be possbile because a Prod Order created for a Valuated Mat will always have MAT as settlement receiver
however, give a try as below
1. In your Settlement Profile - Assign a Source Structure
2. In the Source Str - Create 2 Assignments, say, 10 & 20
10 - Include all the Cost elements which should settle to Cost Center... Specify
20 - All others which should settle to MAT
3. In your allocation structure, allow both CTR/MAT as allowed receivers
4. While creating settlement rule in Prod Order - Create 2 settlement rules
a. In One settlement rule, Choose the Source Str Assignment 10 and Specify Cost Ctr as Settlement Receiver
b. In 2nd settlement rule, this will be auto generated by the system to MAT... Choose the Source Str Assgn 20 here
Br, Ajay M

WBS settled cost in sales order

Hi,
We settlele the WBS to Sales order and where we can see the settled cost in sales order.
Kindly suggest.
Thanks,

Dear Sudha,
You can check if the costs are transferred from WBS element in CJI3 (you will see a credit posting for the WBS element)
You can check if the costs are debited to the Sales Order using KVBI (you wlll see a debit posting for the Sales Order item)
Note: Cost elements that you see could be a settlement cost element /original cost element based on the allocation structure used.
Kind Regards
Umapathi G

Defalult settlement tule in maint order......

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for