Making GL Account field editable during Approval Process

Hi Experts,
We are in SRM 7.0 and using process controlled workflow.
As a business requirent,we want the GL account field to be editable during the approval process i.e during approval process,approve wants to change the GL account in the shopping cart as the GL account may not be correctly entered.
Is it possible to make the GL account field editable during approval process?if Yes,please share how it can be done.
Any pointers will be highly appreciated.
Thanks & Regards,
Rupesh

Hi,
You can find info in help.sap.com.
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_srm70/helpdata/EN/5c/b5a6783fc34466834fbc48def23d2d/frameset.htm
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_srm70/helpdata/EN/01/ad7bc4d66f4bc1a52a0cd21cdfa2ff/frameset.htm
Level Type: There are 3 possible entries. Approval with completion, Approval and Automatic. Within
a completion step the document can be changed by the approver if the u2018Changeableu2019 flag is set.
Within the approval phase, the document can only be approved or rejected but not changed. It is not
possible to mix the two phases of completion and approval. The completion phase is always before
the approval phase. The automatic step is a final means of validating the approval process, and to
verify that at least one step was returned without any error (example: event 0EV999). Depending on
the task ID assigned to the automatic step, the document will then be either approved or rejected.
Regards,
Masa

Similar Messages

Error during approval Process flow in Process controlled workflow

Hello Experts,
We are in SRM 7.0 classic scenario using Process controlled workflow.WE recently connected a new backend R/3 system to our SRM system i.e we now have 2 R/3 backend system connected to SRM system
It is regarding the two new additional account assignment categories that came into picture when we connected the new R/3 backend system to our SRM system, i.e. Asset and Network.
There seems to be some problem with the approval workflow for those SHC, that have such Acc *** Cats.
Please find below my obeservations:
- if you have just one line item in the SHC, and this item is either booked on Asset or on Network, than everything goes fine. After the Acc *** approval, the PR is created in R/3
- if you have SC with a mix between an "old" Acc *** Cat (Cost Centre, WBS and Order) and one of the "new" Acc *** Cats, than the workflow is not working as required --- the manager, that is responsible for the accounting approval of the two positions (e.g Cost Centre and Asset) gets only one work item in his approval overview --- in that work item, the two positions are there, but the Asset one is grayed out --- so, the Manager approves only the Cost Centre positions and than the SC is no longer with the approver --- if you observe the SC now from the requisitioner point of view, the status of the line items in the approval process overview of both(!) lines is "approved", but the overall status of the SC is still "in approval"
Can you all experts plz let us know why this is happening and how this can be resolved?
Any pointers will be highly appreciated.
Thanks & Regards,
RKS

Hi,
What is Resp. Resolver Name and Decision Type in your Process Level Definition? Did you create custom agent BADI implementation?
Regards,
Masa

Making the Asset field editable in MIGO

Hi,
I need a help in MIGO transaction. If you do a GR against a PO with type ACCOUNT ASSIGNMENT = A (asset), that is , if in EKPO table the record of that PO contains a value EKPO-KNTTP = A, in the MIGO screen you find a field "Asset", in the Genral TAB of line Item Data. Can please tell me how to make that field editable?
Points Guranteed.

Hello Anid,
You need to make setting for the account assignment category "A" in the SPRO mode
SPRO -> Mat mangt -> Purchsing -> Account assignment - > Maintain account assignment categor
Select the line item with "A", click on Detail and flag mark "Acct assignment changable"
Hope this will resolve your problem
Regards
Arif Mansuri

Approver skipped during approval process in N-step BADI workflow

Hi,
I am some problem in n-step BADI approval process. For some reasons one of the approvers is skipping during approval. And later in the approval preview it observes that the approver, who is just above the skipped approver, is appeared twice.
I am not able to simulate this issue though this is happening in the system frequesntly though it is not for all.
Can you please let me know what is the problem in the system and how can we rectify this issue?
Thank You.
Regards,
Krish

Hello
sorry search for the n-step WS14500015 is the item based...
Another thing, you can try with testing to restrict the case to special conditions. Are there any added-approver there? Is there any approver who makes some changes to the SC? etc..
Daniel

How can i make recon account field editable

Hi,
Can you help how to make the recon account field of a customer editable?
Thank you.
Rachelle

Hi Rachel,
Use T.code OB20.double click on create customer,double clcik on company code data,double click on account management,make the reconciliation account as optional entry and save.
Make ur changes and if u want to restore the changes,follow the same procedure again.
Thanks
Aravind

Making a single field editable with certain conditions

Hi,
We have an requirement wherein only a single field in an read only BC should be editable(with a certain condition).
Kindly help me on this.
Thanks and Regards,
Priya

Hi,
The only way is put the "condition" in a calculated field. Create one more applet (clone of the read only applet). Make all the other fields read only at "applet level" and leave the one field as editable. Use the calculated field to toggle the cloned applet. Thats it. Any query revert back.
Regards,
Joseph

Replace GL Account to other during elimination process

Hi Friends;
I have an issue in the process of elimination, i have a elimination where I must to replace a account for another (Business rule of my company), this it could be configured in SEM BCS?, exist some rule for this?? I attach example of what I need.
Transaction to Eliminate:
Account
Account Type
Debit
Credit
5311232
Profit
XXX
4600090
Expenses
XXX
When exist a elimination of this kind (configured in BCS), the system must replace the account to post (4600090), to other account (for example 41127)....
Thanks a lot!!
Best Regards,
César.

Hi Eugene:
I correct my question, basically what I need is that when there is an accounting entry of the type mentioned, the elimination should be in the account 5311232 (debit) and in the account 41127 (credit).
This is the data variable (This is the configuration that must be done in BCS):
Account
Account Type
Debit
Credit
5311232
REVENUE
XXX
4600090
EXPENSES
XXX
but the accounts that should affect (in the elimination) are:
Account
Account Type
Debit
Credit
5311232
REVENUE
XXX
41127
EXPENSES
XXX
Do you understand the question?
Thanks a lot,
Kind regards,
César.

Making certain DIR fields editable even when the DIR is in locked status(S)

Is it possible to make certain fields in the DIR editable even though the DIR status is locked (S)?
I guess it can't be done through customising. We've made a suggestion that the users should change the status so that the document will become editable again.
But they would like to edit certain fields, i.e. description and lab/office only. The rest of the fields and data should remain locked. Can this be achieved through a user-exit somehow?
Regards,
Kenneth

Dear Kenneth,
as far as I know this is not working because due to the locked status type the field are disabled by the system. So to avoid this the whole checking logic would have to be changed.
Best regards,
Christoph

Making standard SAP field editable

I have two standard fields VBRP-KOSTL (Cost Center) and VBRP-PRCTR (Profit Center) in transaction VF01(Create billing document) that I want to make editable. Can anyone give me detailed step on how to achieve this?
Thanks for your help. This would be greatly appreciated.

Dear Abbey,
You can do this by maintaining trasaction variant in SHD0. You would have options to make a field display only, required entry, optional entry, supress.
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_webas620/helpdata/en/eb/5fab41d79b11d296190000e82de14a/content.htm
In the SAP Reference IMG, you can create transaction variants. Choose Basis Components -> Application Personalization -> Tailoring of Application Transactions -> Configure Transaction-Related Display Values for Fields (Transaction SHD0). Transaction variants allow you to preset values for fields in a transaction, set field attributes, or hide entire screens.
To execute a transaction variant, you define a variant transaction using the Transaction Maintenance transaction (SE93).
Once you have entered a transaction code and short description, choose transaction type Transaction with variant (Variant transaction).
To define a variant, enter the name of the transaction and the name of the variant. You can then use the new transaction code to start the special variant of the transaction.
Hope this will resolve your issue.
Regards,
Naveen.

Making Employment status field editable in Actions infotype

Hi All,
Can we make the Employment status or Customer specific status editable in Actions Infotype 0000?
I tried doing that in 'Change Screen modification' in IMG, but it isn't working.
Please provide your inputs.
Thanks!

Hi, 
It is not possile to do it.
Each action is assigned the three status indicators STAT1 (customer defined), STAT2 (employment), STAT3 (special payment) in the customizing system.
When a personnel action record is created, the system automatically fills the Customer defined, Employment and Special payment fields if the action affects the employee's status.
The first record of the Actions infotype is assigned the status specified in the customizing system. All other records
have the same status indicator as the new personnel action if this is not BLANK in the customizing system.
have the same status indicator as the previous record if this is BLANK in the customizing system.
This applies to all three indicators.
Can you let us know the business need or requirement to do it??
Good luck 
Thanks,
Amosha
 "Known is a drop & unknown is an OCEAN!"

Add required information during approval process

Hello,
I am trying to do the following : A user is entering a request for a resource . This request must be approved by a manager.. My problem is that the manager
must provide additional information before the provisioning can start. The user himself should not be able to insert this info.
Can this be done? and how?

Hi,
First thing, what do you mean by Additional Information (Either user information or some information regarding Request).
If it is related to request then, OOTB you can do this via the add comments for the particular request which would be saved into the database with the request. The user itself would be able to view the same.The comments however are not mandatory and the manager can skip them. In case if you want this comments to be mandatory, that would involve doing quite a bit of customization involving jsps/struts and etc.
Let me know if you want any help in that.
Cheers!!!

Designate form field type during import process Acrobat 10

Is there a way for me to assign a type of form field to content in Word when I import it into Acrobat to create a form? Acrobat knows to create entry fields when I input underscores after text, and it knows to create digital signature fields when it sees the word "signature" followed by underscores.
However, I'm having a problem with check boxes and radio buttons. I've been creating them manually, which means they're never exactly the same size or positioned exactly right. It's also very time-consuming. Is there something that indicates to Acrobat that it should create a radio button or check box, much like the underscores tell it to create an entry field?

No there's not. But there are a number of things you can do to create fields that are the same size and quickly align, as discussed here just the other day: http://forums.adobe.com/thread/1087979?tstart=0

RFQ Approval Process through Workflow

Dear experts,
We are on planning phase of RFQ release approval through SAP Workflow. There is an issue I would like to hear from your valuable thoughts.
When an RFQ is created, ME41, all individual bids are collected under a unique collective number. Once price maintain process is done through ME47 for all bidder, we would like to send all RFQu2019s, with necessary information, which are linked to a collective number in one e-mail even if there are tens of RFQu2019s linked a collective number, not one by one sending it as we do in PO workflow process.
Is it possible to realize this case within SAP standard approval process? Because so far I noticed that once fundamental customizing is done after price maintaining step RFQu2019s are send individually, one by one, to approvers.
Cheers

Dear Melih,
I suppose you want to get approved the best offer in the bid. The best practice is to have a strong rules based on predefined criteria which quotation to be choosen by Purchasing. Then PO/contract/scheduling agreement/PIR can be maintained.
What we have done in our system is that the PO created goes for approval based on Chart of authority via Enterprise portal. A report, displaying the key figures from the RFQs in the bid, vendor evaluation scoring for each vendor, if available and some other data, is linked to the workflow item and displayed during approval process.
Regards,
Ognian

TS4002 Problem during delivery processing

Since 08:00 UK time Thursday 7 March 2013 I receive an extra email with everyone hitting my icloud account marked:-
Problem during delivery processing
Hope its fixed soon, my inbox is filling fast!

Since 08:00 UK time Thursday 7 March 2013 I receive an extra email with everyone hitting my icloud account marked:-
Problem during delivery processing
Hope its fixed soon, my inbox is filling fast!

Disable GL Account Field for editing in the Shopping Cart SRM 7.0

Hi,
We would like to disable the GL Account field for editing only on the Shopping Cart Approval Screen. I tried to implement this through configuration of Metadata Dynamic Class in SPRO->SRM Application Server ->Cross Application Basic Settings->Extension & Field Control ->Configure Control for Fields of substructure. But the class is not getting triggered.
Any help would be appreciated. We are on SRM 7.0
Thanks
Raghav

Hi Rohit,
Try to activate the view and component and then see. If this does not works, create an enhancement for the view and write the below code in method WDDOMODIFYVIEW
DATA btn_confirm TYPE REF TO cl_wd_button.
btn_confirm ?= view->get_element( 'AUTO_CONFIRMATION' ).
if btn_confirm is BOUND.
btn_confirm->SET_TEXT( value = 'Confirmation' ).
endif.
This code will set the button text as 'Confirmation' .
Regards,
Anubhav

Making GL Account field editable during Approval Process

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for