Making UI Invisible Issue

Hi All,
I am facing an issue in making the text field UI invisible.
The issue is while making the text field UI invisible, only the text iniside is getting invisible, the text field remains same.
Kindly help us in solving this issue.
Thanks in Advance,
Thanks & Regards,
Chandran S

Hi,
Here is my scenario and also let me spceify clearly where was the problem.
I have a set of table values, that has to displayed in the form not as table but as shown below
I have maintained two subforms inside the Main subform Subform1_Objectives (flowed, Repeat subform..... properties enabled)
Subform1 (flowed, Repeat subform..... properties enabled)
Subform2_Objectives (positioned, Repeat subform..... properties enabled)
Here is the Script for the above for making Invisible
// Getting the Objectives Count.
var objectivesCount= data.Subform1_Objectives.Subform1.Subform2_Objectives.instanceManager.count;
// Determining the Part Appraisal and Final Appraisal.
for(var i=0;i<objectivesCount;i++)
    var notesVisibility = xfa.resolveNode("data.Subform1_Objectives.Subform1.Subform2_Objectives["i"].NOTES_VISIBLE").rawValue;
    if((notesVisibility !="VC"))
        xfa.resolveNode("data.Subform1_Objectives.Subform1.Subform2_Objectives["i"].WIEGHTING").presence="invisible";
        xfa.resolveNode("data.Subform1_Objectives.Subform1.Subform2_Objectives["i"].NOTES_VISIBLE").presence="invisible";
        xfa.resolveNode("data.Subform1_Objectives.Subform1.Subform2_Objectives["i"].PART_APPR_NOTES").presence="invisible";
        xfa.resolveNode("data.Subform1_Objectives.Subform1.Subform2_Objectives["i"].FINAL_APPR_NOTES").presence="invisible";
I have a static input field in the same form , i tested making invsible, its fine and getting invisible.
The same thing i try inside the subform, only the text gets invsisble, but the text box remains same.
Best Regards,
Chandran S

Similar Messages

While making field invisible at runtime in FPM_FORM_UIBB that row is coming as blank

Hi All,
In one of the requirement we are making one of the fields indivisible at runtime in the method - GET_DATA of the class - CL_HRESS_PER_DETAIL.
But row in which the filed is made invisible is coming as blank .
Is there any way to change the row number of the fields at run time .
Thanks
Amol

We don't have option for specifying the row / column options at runtime.
In structure FPMGB_T_FIELDUSAGE We have only Mandatory/Visibility/Read-only/Enabled options to set for any field.

Making tabs invisible in FPM_OIF_COMPONENT does not work

we have a requirement to hide some FPM tabs (main views) in the ESS talent profile iView.
after making those tabs invisible in the FPM component configuration they still show up as visible. Any idea why?
more precisely, we are making FPM tabs (main views) invisible In component configuration HRTMC_EP_OIF of component FPM_OIF_COMPONENT.
Regards,
Tiberiu

Hi,
I assume here that at design time you make them via the configuration invisible. At runtime if you see the tabs then i suspect that there are some Dynamic programming involved or other variants exists that you haven't changed yet.
Go back to the application configuration and test it from there and if it is still not working then use the Debugger to see what happens and why your configuration is not working.

Problem with making picture invisible

Hi,
I prospect forums but I have not found solutions to my problems. I
want to display different pictures at different times or successively.
I want to display one picture, wait until the user click onto it
(I know how do it), then display another picture in the place of the
first and so blinking (making invisible and inactive) the first.
Sorry for this simple request. Thanks in advance for your help.

Hi,
I send here the program I would like to realize.
The user must clicks a certain number of times (once or five times) on a red rectangle before two shapes (A and B, once in the left and once in the right) appear and the subject chooses either one. The same thing with another pair of stimuli (C and D) after completion of a number of clicks required on the rectangle. One sequence consists on 2 presentations of the pair AB stimuli with each stimuli once at right and once at left + 2 presentations of CD stimuli with each stimuli once at right and once at left.
I want to randomize order of events, so I will create (no doing yet) 24 sequences of possible order of events (not only display AB_BA_CD_DC, like the example, here in the block diagram, but too AB_DC_BA_CD, for example). The choice of the sequence is randomized with a random number (multiply by one for the moment in order you see immediately the events when you run the VI).
I use ring picture to display the stimuli and enumerated constant for the type of stimuli I display. What I would like to do is using only 2 rings indicators, but I have seen when I did that, the program doesn't work. I was "forced" to use one ring each time. It will be more costly for me to write because I must create property node_property visible_false for other ring each time and in this cas I would use 288 rings.
My question is how can I do for using only 2 rings? And am I forced to use sequence structure?
Thanks in advance for your help.
sequence 1 effort Ã FR5.zip (849 kb)
Attachments:
sequence 1 effort Ã FR5.zip ‏849 KB

Making Subform invisible or visible

Hi ,
I wanted to make a subform visible or invisible on selecting a radiobutton.
I tried using
<subformname>.presence = "invisible";
in the click event of radiobutton , but its not working.
Please suggest a solution.
Points will be rewarded.
Thanks.

Hello Thomas,
You can use the following pattern of the Scripting to hide subforms.
<formName>.<Subform Name>.presence = "hidden";
few important points to remember :
1. use scripting language as 'Java Script'
2. write the script under 'initialize' mode and the Run at option should be set to 'client'.
Hope, this helps in resolving your issue.
Regards,
Debasish

Security, dual boot os x partitions; making each invisible from each other?

I have partitioned my Mini's hard drive with the intention of using one partition for general exploratory google surfing, and the other partition for credit card transactions, etc, thereby keeping the latter free of nasties and avoiding hacker exploits. Is it possible to set each partition up to be invisible to the other?
It occured to me another way of doing this would be to take out the mini's hard drive, put it in a bootable firewire caddy and have a second external firewire hard drive; you would simply unplug the hard drive you weren't using or, preferably, there would be some physical switch to switch between the two. I prefer simple options to configuring a firewall to the nth degree, though I should mention that I bought a netgear router that apparently has security features. I need to read up on that, too, but at the moment I am exploring my security options and firewall settings.
Any help would be much appreciated!

I'm not a security expert or anything, but I don't actually have a whole lot of faith in the security of the "out of the box" OS X configuration. I gather the unix bits have a pretty good track record, but some of the GUI aspects seem to reflect a lackadaisical attitude toward security. Safari's "open safe files" setting, enabled by default, has gotten Apple into trouble by exacerbating other problems on at least three separate occasions. The fact that certain areas of the "/Library" folder can be written to by an "admin", thereby affecting other users, and without the need for a password, has been exploited by iOpener in "Panther", and by "oompa-loompa" in "Tiger". You would have though once would have been enough for either of these things. "Fool me once..." "Those that fail to learn from history..." Obviously, somebody isn't getting it.
So I think you are right to be concerned. I'm not sure how I would handle the situation, but to comment on your question, it is generally considered that the best way to deal with a compromised system is to erase the hard drive and restore everything from known "good" media. Given that approach, and since you are already willing to go to the effort of creating a separate, presumably uncompromised system on an external drive for your secure transactions, why not go all the way and keep that drive disconnected when not in use? It is possible to prevent volumes from being mounted automatically at boot time (try searching for "os x" and "/etc/fstab" for example), but this won't prevent mounting if the drive is unplugged by someone and plugged in again, at which time compromised system would be able to affect the external drive. Going into more speculative territory, maybe if one boot drive was formatted HFS+ and the other UFS (OS X supposedly supports both for booting), maybe the system files required for reading the non-boot filesystem type could be removed... But keeping it unplugged would seem to be much easier, and probably safer since there would be no physical connection...
and btw, despite all the bad things I have said about Apple's apparent attitude toward security, that article you linked to is inaccurate, out-dated (ie irrelevant), sensationalistic garbage.

Making Dimensions invisible for a role in ssas cube

Hi All,
I have a dimension and I don't want the users of a specific ssas role to use/see this dimension. At moment I am using attribute security by defining a deny member set. Is it possible that the user (belonging to that specific role), while browsing/querying
the cube, can not see the dimension itself?
I can use perspectives but I am looking for some other way, if any.
Nitesh Rai- Please mark the post as answered if it answers your question

Hi Nitesh,
Perspective is not a solution, it's a workaround. SSAS don't provide an opportunity to hide dimension from specific role.
Your issue is discussed
here and
here too.
Best regards.

Targeting Arrays and making them invisible

Hi: I'm having trouble targeting elements of an array using AS3. I have five buttons in an array named botons.
var botons:Array = [boton_1, boton_2, boton_3, boton_4, boton_5];
Each button goes to a different page, but they all are on the same layer like navigation bar.
When page 1 is visited button 1 should be invisible and the others visible. When on page 2, button 2 should be invisible but all others visible.
I used the following to make the entire array invisible and it works.
for(var i:int; i<clips.length;i++)
botons[i].visible=false;
How can I make each button invisible when visiting its page, but make the rest visible?
Thanks
German

Ned:
Here is my entire script. I added what you suggested. It still doesn't work.
Page names: first, second, third, fouth, and fifth.
boton_1.addEventListener(MouseEvent.CLICK, goPNext);
boton_2.addEventListener(MouseEvent.CLICK, goPNext);
boton_3.addEventListener(MouseEvent.CLICK, goPNext);
boton_4.addEventListener(MouseEvent.CLICK, goPNext);
boton_5.addEventListener(MouseEvent.CLICK, goPNext);
function goPNext (evt:MouseEvent)
switch (evt.currentTarget.name)
case "boton_1":
gotoAndStop("first");
break;
case "boton_2":
gotoAndStop("second");
break;
case "boton_3":
gotoAndStop("third");
break;
case "boton_4":
gotoAndStop("fourth");
break;
case "boton_5":
gotoAndStop("fifth");
break;
}// end switch
}// function
for(var i:uint = 0; i < 5; i++)
getChildByName("boton"+i).addEventListener(MouseEvent.CLICK, navigate);
function navigate(e:MouseEvent):void
for(var i:uint = 0; i < 5; i++)
getChildByName("boton"+i).visible = true;
e.currentTarget.visible = false;
// determine where to navigate based on e.currentTarget
ERROR
TypeError: Error #1009: Cannot access a property or method of a null object reference.
at subtraction_fla::MainTimeline/frame1()
German

Making KF invisible for one timebucket

hello Team
if I want to make a KF visible / invisible based on time period , how can it be possible?
I have done pivot sorting so that my Chars are in rows and KFs are in columns (below time bucket).
If I want to make certain key figures (E.g. Distribution ) as Invisible ONLY for timebucket "Initial" , can it be possible using macro?
I tried using Row_Visible , col_Visible functions but it makes the visible /invisible for all timebuckets.

Hi Guillaume
Thanks for your reply. But this does not work. It makes the entire column invisible.
The view i want is something like this -
Where, some KFs (6M Avg offtake) can be visible only for timebucket = Initial and should be hidden otherwise.
Please help me to solve this

Making field invisible on screen shifts rest of the fields Up..

Hi All,
I am facing a problem that when i make one of my screen fields invisible the rest of the fields shifts up and fill up the space.
Can this be avoided...
please suggest
thanks in advance,
kushagra sharma

Hi,
Try to make that field with different block and then make them as invisible. it will solve ur problem
Thanks
kishore

BC Is Making Up Invisible Pages

Hi,
So basically, this dropdown menu item, redirects to a page that does not exist, only when a customer is logged into a secure zone. The link to this non existent page is no where to be found. Not on the templates, not in the menu, not anywhere. I even tried to make a page so that at least that link from the drop down goes to SOMETHING, but when I tried to make a page, apparently that page already existed. So nope, that didn't work.
I made a re-direct from the fake link to the correct one, that didn't work either. The re-direct is there, but doesnt work.
If you can figure this out you are probably not human. But either way I'd love your help.

Hi there,
You have not provided any links or anything so very hard to help you at the moment.
Firstly - BC does not make invisible pages.
I am not sure what your doing but sounds like you have got yourself into a bit of a mess. If you click a link to a page that is secure (your not logged in) then it will go to a system page - 401 unauthorised access - This is under system pages in the admin.
And the other part of your post - Not sure what your doing but redirects are something you should not be doing and also make sure your not putting file extensions on for links where pages do not have them and vice versa.

Making code invisible to EPC

Hi,
Can any one know how to make our code invisible to Extended Program check.

Hi,
SET EXTENDED CHECK OFF.
SET EXTENDED CHECK ON.
It sets extended check on and off.
Please kindly remember to reward points for useful answers
Regards, Manuel

WDA - Making group invisible initially and the visble

Dear All,
My current situation is that I have a group which contains several labals and several input fields.
I would like to make all the above mentioned invisible initially and then on the click of a link to action the whole set should become visible.
Can this be done without creating attributes for each of the ui elements including the labels and inputfields....
Please help....
Thanks in advance.........

Hi Nisha,
You have got a Group element inside which you have your Labels and Input fields right.
Now create an attribute in your context with name "IS_VISIBLE" of type wdy_boolean.
Now come to the layout tab and bind this attribute to the VISIBLE property of the Group Element.
In your WDDOINIT.
if the context node name is "VISIBILITY" and attribute name is "IS_VISIBLE"
Lo_visb = wd_context->get_child_node( 'VISIBILITY' ).
    CALL METHOD lo_visib->set_attribute
EXPORTING
   value = abap_false
   name   = 'IS_VISIBLE'.
in your on action method set it to abap_true.
Hope this helps.
Regards,
Ismail.

IsTraversable making files invisible, rather than non-traversable

I have some files stored in a folder (some kind of "compound" file) so when the user opens the folder it acts like a file. At the moment I am drawing its own little icon and stuff, everything works fine except the user can "double click" on the file and instead of opening it, they will go into it and see all the guts inside. I found the isTraversable method of the FileView object and that does half the job (other half would be to support double - click opening) However, when i try to use it anything I set as non traversable becomes invisible. I suppose its doing its job (I cannot traverse the file that isnt there) but i would like to be able to choose this file.
public Boolean isTraversable(File f)
          Boolean ret = super.isTraversable(f);
          if (QuantitationFileChooser.isQuantitationFile(f, false))
               ret= new Boolean(false);
          return ret;
     }Am i missing the point of this function or something? It seem pretty simple, i have no idea what i am doing wrong! The documentation says its exactly what i want:
"public Boolean isTraversable(File f) Whether the directory is traversable or not. This might be useful, for example, if you want a directory to represent a compound document and don't want the user to descend into it. "
Thanks for any help

794057 wrote:
Am i missing the point of this function or something? It seem pretty simple, i have no idea what i am doing wrong! The documentation says its exactly what i want:
"public Boolean isTraversable(File f) Whether the directory is traversable or not. This might be useful, for example, if you want a directory to represent a compound document and don't want the user to descend into it. "Works as documented for me. Run this code and try double-clicking around.import java.io.File;
import javax.swing.JFileChooser;
import javax.swing.SwingUtilities;
import javax.swing.filechooser.FileView;
public class ChooserWithView {
public static void main(String[] args) {
    SwingUtilities.invokeLater(new Runnable() {
      @Override
      public void run() {
        JFileChooser chooser = new JFileChooser();
        chooser.setFileSelectionMode(JFileChooser.FILES_AND_DIRECTORIES);
        chooser.setFileView(new FileView() {
          @Override
          public Boolean isTraversable(File f) {
            if (f.getName().contains("o")) {
              return false;
            return null;
        chooser.showOpenDialog(null);
        System.out.println(chooser.getSelectedFile());
}

The news is making the activation issue seem like a SMALL number of people

One articles title is "Some iPhone customers put on hold"
- http://news.com.com/SomeiPhone+customers+put+onhold/2100-1041_3-6194446.html
A quote from that article:
""There are a small percentage of iPhone customers who have had a less-than-perfect activation experience. We're working hard to resolve any issues quickly," Natalie Kerris, an Apple spokeswoman, said via e-mail."
Another article :
Piper Jaffray: 500,000 iPhones sold over the weekend
- http://news.com.com/8301-107843-9738446-7.html?part=rss&subj=news&tag=2547-10403-0-5
#### If they sold 500,000 iPhones this weekend and they say 2% of the people are having some issues. . . . that is 10,000 people . . . (If my math is right)
That sounds like a LOT!
(The iPhone itself, ONCE it's working has been terrific, but the activations woes stink!)

#### If they sold 500,000 iPhones this weekend
and they say 2% of the people are having some issues.
. . . that is 10,000 people . . . (If my math is
right)
That sounds like a LOT!
Statistically, it like a pimple on an elephants a--!
Look at it another way. 3 million phones built. There will be between 30,000 - 150,000 phones with internal problems. A lot of phones, yes! But out of 3 million!!!
So people need to put perspective on the issues.
ajm

Making UI Invisible Issue

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for