Security, dual boot os x partitions; making each invisible from each other?

I have partitioned my Mini's hard drive with the intention of using one partition for general exploratory google surfing, and the other partition for credit card transactions, etc, thereby keeping the latter free of nasties and avoiding hacker exploits. Is it possible to set each partition up to be invisible to the other?
It occured to me another way of doing this would be to take out the mini's hard drive, put it in a bootable firewire caddy and have a second external firewire hard drive; you would simply unplug the hard drive you weren't using or, preferably, there would be some physical switch to switch between the two. I prefer simple options to configuring a firewall to the nth degree, though I should mention that I bought a netgear router that apparently has security features. I need to read up on that, too, but at the moment I am exploring my security options and firewall settings.
Any help would be much appreciated!

I'm not a security expert or anything, but I don't actually have a whole lot of faith in the security of the "out of the box" OS X configuration. I gather the unix bits have a pretty good track record, but some of the GUI aspects seem to reflect a lackadaisical attitude toward security. Safari's "open safe files" setting, enabled by default, has gotten Apple into trouble by exacerbating other problems on at least three separate occasions. The fact that certain areas of the "/Library" folder can be written to by an "admin", thereby affecting other users, and without the need for a password, has been exploited by iOpener in "Panther", and by "oompa-loompa" in "Tiger". You would have though once would have been enough for either of these things. "Fool me once..." "Those that fail to learn from history..." Obviously, somebody isn't getting it.
So I think you are right to be concerned. I'm not sure how I would handle the situation, but to comment on your question, it is generally considered that the best way to deal with a compromised system is to erase the hard drive and restore everything from known "good" media. Given that approach, and since you are already willing to go to the effort of creating a separate, presumably uncompromised system on an external drive for your secure transactions, why not go all the way and keep that drive disconnected when not in use? It is possible to prevent volumes from being mounted automatically at boot time (try searching for "os x" and "/etc/fstab" for example), but this won't prevent mounting if the drive is unplugged by someone and plugged in again, at which time compromised system would be able to affect the external drive. Going into more speculative territory, maybe if one boot drive was formatted HFS+ and the other UFS (OS X supposedly supports both for booting), maybe the system files required for reading the non-boot filesystem type could be removed... But keeping it unplugged would seem to be much easier, and probably safer since there would be no physical connection...
and btw, despite all the bad things I have said about Apple's apparent attitude toward security, that article you linked to is inaccurate, out-dated (ie irrelevant), sensationalistic garbage.

Similar Messages

  • Linux - OS X dual boot/encryption/shared partition suggestions?

    Hi,
    I've been wanting to encrypt my hard drive for a while and have a MacBook. Currently I have the following setup:
    - sda1: GUID partition table
    - sda2: OS X (~60GB)
    - sda3: Arch (~15GB)
    I mount my OS X partition using HFS+ (non-journaled) and keep everything in the OS X partition except for temp stuff on Linux (downloads I don't care about, various documents I might be working on but will eventually delete or move to OS X). This way, I have one repo for all my files. I use rsync to backup my Arch home dir to OS X and then use Carbon Copy Cloner to backup OS X to an external hard drive.
    Now I'd like to do some encryption... but am not really sure how. Here's two scenarios I've considered after reading a bunch. Thoughts?
    --- Option 1 ---
    - sda1: GUID partition table
    - sda2: HFS+ volume for OS X
    --- TrueCrypt volume to be created and mounted at /home
    - sda3: /boot for Linux
    - sda4: Linux with dm-crypt/LUKS
    --- just / (no LVM making separate partitions)
    --- mount the OS X TrueCrypt volume for filesharing between OSs
    Notes: I don't like this for a couple of reasons.
    - I have to kind of guess at how much OS X will accumulate over time and make my TC volume for /home accordingly. If I ever run into issues... I'll have to backup, delete, make a new and larger TC volume and then copy it all over
    --- Option 2 ---
    - sda1: GUID partition table
    - sda2: OS X
    --- FireVault used on /home
    - sda3: /boot for Linux
    - sda4: Linux with dm-crypt/LUKS
    --- take the plunge and just start keeping all my files on Linux instead of OS X (everything used to be on OS X and I'd just mount the HFS+ drive in Linux to access things)
    --- perhaps create a TC volume file that can be used to share files between partitions via the OS X /Shared directory?
    Notes: I like this better. Everything is encrypted and thus I can just estimate like 15-20GB for OS X and only keep OS X specific files there (iWork, i* files, etc.) and then make the rest of the disk available for Linux. Since dm-crypt can be used for the whole Linux partition I can let everything (/usr, /var, /home) grow however it wants and not worry about my bad partition size/TC container size predictions.
    Remaining issues/questions:
    - Still bummed that I can't just keep everything on one OS or the other and share unless I go the TrueCrypt container for OS X home route. I really like that feature now as, essentially, my Linux /home folder right now is just for .configs and temp... everything I actually care about is only in one place. I don't like the idea of having to "merge" two sets of documents I really care about and make the dir hierarchy work...
    - Unanswered question remains of whether I can mount logical volumes on both OSs. If I have a logical HFS+ volume in an extended partition, can Linux mount that and vice versa (assuming the filesystem is readable by both, that is)?
    - How others get around the issue of making partition size predictions when creating separate partitions for /home vs. /, /usr, etc.
    - What partitions are nice to have on their own (besides /home)?
    Any thoughts? Am I best just going with TrueCrypt? I've read a lot of people who vote against it due to the license, though I'm not clear on why exactly... just not "totally" open-source? For this reason, I guess I'm leaning toward the second option since I can use standard tools on each. I don't think that plausible deniability is a huge deal for me... though perhaps that could be seen as another advantage of TC? I'll shut up now. Serious thanks for any suggestions... I can't find hardly anything on OS X/Linux dual booting and the use of encryption.

    Hi,
    I've been wanting to encrypt my hard drive for a while and have a MacBook. Currently I have the following setup:
    - sda1: GUID partition table
    - sda2: OS X (~60GB)
    - sda3: Arch (~15GB)
    I mount my OS X partition using HFS+ (non-journaled) and keep everything in the OS X partition except for temp stuff on Linux (downloads I don't care about, various documents I might be working on but will eventually delete or move to OS X). This way, I have one repo for all my files. I use rsync to backup my Arch home dir to OS X and then use Carbon Copy Cloner to backup OS X to an external hard drive.
    Now I'd like to do some encryption... but am not really sure how. Here's two scenarios I've considered after reading a bunch. Thoughts?
    --- Option 1 ---
    - sda1: GUID partition table
    - sda2: HFS+ volume for OS X
    --- TrueCrypt volume to be created and mounted at /home
    - sda3: /boot for Linux
    - sda4: Linux with dm-crypt/LUKS
    --- just / (no LVM making separate partitions)
    --- mount the OS X TrueCrypt volume for filesharing between OSs
    Notes: I don't like this for a couple of reasons.
    - I have to kind of guess at how much OS X will accumulate over time and make my TC volume for /home accordingly. If I ever run into issues... I'll have to backup, delete, make a new and larger TC volume and then copy it all over
    --- Option 2 ---
    - sda1: GUID partition table
    - sda2: OS X
    --- FireVault used on /home
    - sda3: /boot for Linux
    - sda4: Linux with dm-crypt/LUKS
    --- take the plunge and just start keeping all my files on Linux instead of OS X (everything used to be on OS X and I'd just mount the HFS+ drive in Linux to access things)
    --- perhaps create a TC volume file that can be used to share files between partitions via the OS X /Shared directory?
    Notes: I like this better. Everything is encrypted and thus I can just estimate like 15-20GB for OS X and only keep OS X specific files there (iWork, i* files, etc.) and then make the rest of the disk available for Linux. Since dm-crypt can be used for the whole Linux partition I can let everything (/usr, /var, /home) grow however it wants and not worry about my bad partition size/TC container size predictions.
    Remaining issues/questions:
    - Still bummed that I can't just keep everything on one OS or the other and share unless I go the TrueCrypt container for OS X home route. I really like that feature now as, essentially, my Linux /home folder right now is just for .configs and temp... everything I actually care about is only in one place. I don't like the idea of having to "merge" two sets of documents I really care about and make the dir hierarchy work...
    - Unanswered question remains of whether I can mount logical volumes on both OSs. If I have a logical HFS+ volume in an extended partition, can Linux mount that and vice versa (assuming the filesystem is readable by both, that is)?
    - How others get around the issue of making partition size predictions when creating separate partitions for /home vs. /, /usr, etc.
    - What partitions are nice to have on their own (besides /home)?
    Any thoughts? Am I best just going with TrueCrypt? I've read a lot of people who vote against it due to the license, though I'm not clear on why exactly... just not "totally" open-source? For this reason, I guess I'm leaning toward the second option since I can use standard tools on each. I don't think that plausible deniability is a huge deal for me... though perhaps that could be seen as another advantage of TC? I'll shut up now. Serious thanks for any suggestions... I can't find hardly anything on OS X/Linux dual booting and the use of encryption.

  • Dual booting and sharing partition

    Hi,
    I am planning on installing Xubuntu and Arch on my laptop during the christmas break and have been reading around about how to best do this.  I want to share the /home directory between these two installs to minimize duplicating files.  I would like to know if there are any other folders that can be shared between two systems like Xubuntu and Arch.
    Secondly, I would like to know if both Xubuntu and Arch can be installed on logical partitions within the same extended partitions.

    This in only my opinion (there are many, many ways partitioning a dual-boot system), but I would personally not share /home (or any other system partition for that matter). Too much hassle (persmissions on your .dotfiles will be tricky), and not enough space savings to be worth the trouble.
    Instead I would create a ‘extra’ partition and use that instead of /home for storing personal files/multimedia file in both OS’s. I would give it a label like ‘Multimedia’ or ‘Shared’ or ‘Data’ or whatever, and make this partition large enough to hold all my stuff.
    Then just mount this shared partition to wherever you like in both OS’s, via /etc/fstab
    Secondly)
    Yes logical partitions are fine for installing (somebody correct me if I am wrong, but my understanding is that Linux does not care about being installed a on Primary or Logical partition). Just make sure you setup your bootloader properly.
    Also the *biggest* advantage of using Logical partions is that you won’t really have a limit for the number of partitions you can create for each OS.

  • Dual boot Windows 7 partition help

    I want to dual boot Windows 7 & arch but I need help with figuring out what partitions to make and where to put them because it seems the automatic partition-er won't do the trick for me.
    I have two drives that I want to completely format for a fresh, clean install: a 60GB SSD & a 750GB hard drive. I want the end result to be that the SSD only has Windows 7 Pro x64 SP1 installed to it and I will point the 'My Documents', 'My Pictures', etc. to a NTFS partition on the hard disk drive ( I know how to do this folder pointing ). I don't want arch to touch the SSD if possible so I can reformat the SSD separately if I ever just want to reformat Windows. I only want arch to be on the hard disk for that reason. I don't think I care which one handles the OS switching at boot ( should I favor Windows MBR or syslinux? Please give advice. ) And I would assume I make the NTFS partition on the hard disk a primary partition so how do I split up arch for the 3 other primary partitions left since the auto partition from the arch boot CD uses 4?

    I'm no expert, but the way I would do it would be like this:
    1. Create partitions on the HDD for /, /boot, /home and swap, along with one (or more) for your Windows personal files
    2. Set the BIOS to boot from the SSD.
    3. Install Windows on the SSD.
    4. Right-click the "My Documents" folder, select "properties", then the "Location" tab and choose the new location for the folder.
    5. Install Arch on the HDD partitions, and allow the boot manager to install itself in the MBR of the SSD.
    Then the whole boot process will be on the SSD...  If you ever need to get rid of the Linux bootloader, you can overwrite it with a "clean" Windows one using bootrec.exe (see here: http://support.microsoft.com/kb/927392).
    Last edited by esuhl (2012-03-26 04:52:12)

  • Dual boot , windows 7 keep restart after select from grub section

    Hello everyone, i am new here.
    I want to make a dual boot in my computer.
    I am using a same hardisk to install both OS.
    1st, I install arch linux , after install working well from grub.
    2nd, I install windows 7, after install , it skip the grub section , directly load windows 7.
    I boot my archlinux live cd.
    Go to grub .
    type root (hd0, and press tab to make sure my partition.
    setup (hd0).
    The grub section was recover and success to login arch linux.
    but fail to login windows 7 , then i modify /boot/grub/menu.lst . modify the windows (hd0, 1).
    My trouble probem is here, after i select the windows section , my com just like restart computer.
    Even i try change to (hd0, 2 or 3 ) also same problem, windows 7 restart computer.

    I have try to install dual boot for more than 5 time, first i install windows then only come to arch linux, but always fail to boot up windows.
    Thank for helping me ^^
    This is my fdisk -l
    I have 2 hardisk, but i install both Os in the same hardisk.
    Device Boot             Start                  End                  Block              ID              System
    /dev/sdb1                   1                      24                    192742+            83              Linux
    /dev/sdb2                   25                    37                   102400           7                    HPFS/NTFS
    Partition 2 does not end on cylinder boundry
    /dev/sdb3                   37                     8243              65939456           7                 HPFS/NTFS
    /dev/sdb4                   8247                14593               50982277+            5             Extended
    /dev/sdb5                  8247                  8368                  979933+            83             Linux
    /dev/sdb6                  8364                 10858                20000893+             83          Linux
    /dev/sdb7                  10859               14593                  20001356             82          Linux Swap / Solaris
    # (0) Arch Linux
    title Arch Linux
    root (hd0,0)
    kernel /vmlinuz26 root=/dev/sd5 ro
    initrd /kernel26.img
    # (1) Arch Linux
    title Arch Linux fallback
    root (hd0,0)
    kernel /vmlinuz26 root=/dev/sd5 ro
    initrd /kernel26_fallback.img
    # (2) windows
    title windows 7
    rootnoverify (hd0, 1)
    makeactive
    chainloader +1

  • Firefox 34 and Norton Internet Security (Version 21 ff) Don't Like Each Other and It's Not the Toolbar!

    I have discovered that Norton Internet Security (and Norton 360 as well) version 21 and after conflicts with Firefox version 33.0 and later. I have been running the latest Firefox 34 version. When I upgraded on two of my computers to the latest version of NIS (version 21) Firefox (version 34) froze; indeed it locked up the entire computer. I therefore installed Google Chrome and everything worked fine. I can reproduce this error with Firefox like the flip of a switch; it is very consistent! The conflict, by the way, does not go away by disabling the Norton toolbar. I want to continue to use Firefox, and not Chrome, but I don't want the browser to freeze the machine. I run Windows 7 Professional. Do you have any suggestions?

    Oh... I spoke too soon. I went into my office today and ran Norton 360 (Version 21.6) and Firefox 34.0.5 thinking that all would be well because I shut off Hardware Acceleration. Boy, was I wrong. Norton 360 crashed with the Windows message: "Norton 360 has stopped working; it will be shut down." I immediately shut down the computer (even though someone was actually in my office at the time), rebooted, no longer ran Firefox and did a complete virus scan. All is well if I do not use Firefox 34. And so.... I am going to make my life easier and simply move over to Chrome at least on my office machine. I just don't see any other way out of this predicament. I do this reluctantly because Chrome is much slower than Firefox is especially the way I run it. Firefox 34 and NIS Version 21.6 just don't like each other.
    Thanks for your help. It's been a good thread even though I could never figure this out.
    Needs more help.

  • Dual boot, UEFI and partitioning

    Got a new computer which I put my old disks in. After a while I got them to
    boot properly but I'm going to take the time to go from my current MBR setup to
    GPT.
    The idea
    I have three disks, 480GB SSD, 640GB HDD and 2TB HDD. The idea is to use the
    SSD for root and /home and then let the data on the 2TB be as it is (for now).
    I will go all LVM on the SSD and 640 HDD (except for a part which will be for
    windows 8). When I invest in a new disk (2TB) I will make the current 2TB LVM
    as well as that new one so that moving "partitions" (LVM volumes) easier
    if/when needed.
    Questions
    Will I still be needing something like syslinux/grub with UEFI? For the windows
    part, will that require some sort of EFI partition and should I create that or
    just leave 200GB + 500MB space at the beginning of the 640GB disk (and LVM on
    200.5GB-END)?
    If a bootloader is needed, can I put that on my SSD and still boot windows from
    the HDD in an easy fashion?
    Will there be any problems with having one disk still as MBR (I don't have the
    space needed for backing up those 2TB currently)?

    xintron wrote:Will I still be needing something like syslinux/grub with UEFI?
    Booting an OS always requires a boot loader. The details of what boot loaders are available varies from one platform and OS to another, but a boot loader is a necessity. My Web page, Managing EFI Boot Loaders for Linux, describes the options for booting Linux on an EFI-based computer. SYSLINUX and GRUB are both options, but there are others, too. My personal preference is to use the EFI stub loader with rEFInd, but as I'm rEFInd's maintainer, I'm not exactly unbiased.
    For the windows part, will that require some sort of EFI partition and should I create that or just leave 200GB + 500MB space at the beginning of the 640GB disk (and LVM on 200.5GB-END)?
    EFI systems require an EFI System Partition (ESP) to boot any OS. (An exception is EFI-based Macs, but they're just weird all around.) I recommend a size of 550MiB for the ESP. Many Arch Linux users like to mount the ESP at /boot, since that simplifies kernel management with certain boot configurations.
    If a bootloader is needed, can I put that on my SSD and still boot windows from the HDD in an easy fashion?
    Yes, at least in some sense. Boot loaders normally reside on the ESP, which is normally shared between OSes, although there are exceptions to both of these rules. The Windows C: partition is separate from the ESP. In theory, the two can reside on different disks, although in practice I'm not sure how the Windows installers and other tools would cope with that type of configuration. In theory, you can also have multiple ESPs (on the same or on different disks), although the Windows installer flakes out when there are multiple ESPs on a single disk. I'm not sure how the Windows installer copes with a system with multiple ESPs, each on its own disk.
    Note that putting the boot loader on the SSD is something of a waste, since the boot loader is normally accessed only during the boot process, so there's relatively little speed gain from putting it on an SSD vs. on a regular hard disk.
    Will there be any problems with having one disk still as MBR (I don't have the space needed for backing up those 2TB currently)?
    You can mix MBR and GPT; however, on an EFI-based computer, Windows must boot from a GPT disk. (In a conventional setup, this means that C: must be a partition on a GPT disk.) Some EFIs also require that the ESP be on a GPT disk, although I'm not sure how common this requirement is.
    It's possible to convert MBR to GPT without data loss by using gdisk, so you can easily convert your 2TB disk to GPT without doing a backup. This operation is actually safer than it might seem, since the MBR and GPT data structures are quite simple, so there's little that can go wrong compared to, say, resizing a partition. That said, there's still some risk, so if you're not booting Windows from the disk, you might want to just leave it as MBR. Also, some MBR-to-GPT conversions will require shrinking a partition, so you'd need to do that in GParted or some other tool before doing the conversion. Of course, you should always keep backups of important data.

  • "Making multicam sequence from 3 other sequences" not showing video properly

    Well, problem in a nutshell. I created a multicam sequence, using 3 other sequences. But somehow, it's not showing it 100% correctly. Like, the main window shows the video, like it should be, and the smaller windows, are just off sync for some reason (except the only sequence that doesn't have any empty caps on it). Any explanation & fix for this?
    Instant workaround that I just invented. I put some empty title on the empty caps, and now It shows it, like it should be in the smaller windows. But if anybody knows why it did it in the first place, would be clad to know.

    OK, maybe I should clarify...
    Only A2 is coming through, NOT A1 -- so that's inconsistent with what you're saying. I have not checked Audio Follows Video, because that's not the bahvior I want. I'd like to be able to choose from any of the video tracks. Is that not possible in Premiere Pro?
    Also, do you think it makes a difference that I'm 'multicam editing' from a regular sequence (with multicam enabled) as opposed to an actual multicam sequence?
    thanks for the help.

  • Dual-boot OS9 and Leopard on a MDD howto??

    Hi
    If I start with a Leopard DVD, an OS 9 CD, a new unformatted HDD, and a non-FW800 MDD, how to I install it all to dual boot off one partition?
    I have not worked with this stuff in a few years so I am a bit vague and appreciate the help from the community. It is a dual-CPU 1.0 GHz, not FW800, and should support this dual-boot setup.
    Thanks

    It will be hard to find the cd for mac os 9 for this machine.  The mactracker database indicated the machine requires 9.2.2.  I'm not sure if 9.2.2 was ever sold as a stand-alone cd.  There is a possiblity that even if you found mac os 9.2.2, the mdd could have specific drives that might not be on the a full install copy of mdd. There is a fuzzyness over the meaning of 9.2.2, It was the closes OS at the time of ship.  For the full install cd, you best get a point release greater than the release at the time of ship.
    Should you be able to find and correctly identify the grey machine restore cds they would work.
    Another possiblity which I haven't tried but you could always try is to get another g4 and instll 9.x on it then upgrade to 9.2.2. Take out the hd & place it in your mdd.  You never know if this would work unless you try.
    Some people seem to know the numbers on the cd for each machine.
    The cd number might be 6c155 see blow in image
    If you buying this, get a full install 9.2.2 or a machine specific cd & try before you buy.  Some machine might have 9.2.2 on them. If they have a working 9.2.2 on the machine ::: Do not erase it.  Get a backup external drive and back everything up.  If it works & you need it, do not erase.  Buy another dirve.
    get the mactracker app so you can look for other machines. 
    the apple pi apple hobbie clubs might have cds.
    Robert

  • Dual Booting with Windows 8 and 7 Pro in a G6 - 2235us Notebook

    I have a G6 - 2235us Notebook 64 bit  that came with Windows 8.0  installed.
    I would like to install Windows 7 Pro and make it dual book with Windows 8.0 with 7 as the default to start.
    Would you please give me steps as to how to proceed and also the drivers, etc I would need to download.
    Thank you.
    This question was solved.
    View Solution.

    Thank you Paul. I understad  I just have one more question:
    I found this page that gives info about dual booting:
    http://www.pagestart.com/win8dbwin701181301.html
    From your expertise, would you say the steps suggested on that
    page could succeed for making Win 8 and 7 dual boot in this particular machine?

  • Windows 7 Enterprise 32 bit and Windows Server 2012 64 bit successful dual boot.

    Client Windows 7 Enterprise 32 bit SP1, Windows Server 2012 64 bit successfully install for dual boot. Even deleted Windows 7 Enterprise from msconfig, moved Windows Server 2012 partition, for dual boot installed Windows 8.1 64 bit (now posting from),
    deleted Windows Server 2012 from msconfig, moved Windows 8.1 partition, just for knowledge.

    Hi,
    After referring to your post, I can understand you are trying to install 32 bit and 64 bit OS on same system.  Are you trying to perform that? Here providing you thread link for detail.
    dual boot windows 32 bit and 64 bit at same pc
    Hope it helps to understand!
    Regards.

  • Restore Points Deleted w/dual boot & Windows 7

    Dual booting with two partitions
    on another disk with Windows 7 / Windows 10
    and when I returned to Windows 8.1 or
    Windows 10 from Windows 7,
    restore points are deleted and remain
    in Windows 7?
    Is there a solution?
    Thanks
    Hello

    Thanks for the reply,
    If it's the disks to hide concerned,
    I have already done but to no avail ([HKEY_CURRENT_USER \ Software
    \ Microsoft \ Windows \ CurrentVersion
    \ Policies \ Explorer]).
    I know that we could put offline the
    affected partitions ([HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE
    \ SYSTEM \ MountedDevices \ Offline]), but
    later by disk failure in the event log
    ... is that what you propose?
    hello
    Yes and No.
    What do you mean by " but later by disk failure in the event log " ?
    Have a look at this tutorial :
    http://www.geekstogo.com/forum/topic/326541-windows-8-dual-boot-restore-points/
    I am dual booting Win 7 and Win 10 TP Enterprise build 9879. That tutorial works for me.
    P.S. ( Ignore the triple boot part.)

  • Dual Boot Windows 7 with Ubuntu

    Hello! I am Vasanth.
    my laptop is HP Pavilion g6 2016tx. it runs on Windows 7 Home Basic!
    My college have given me a project on Linux OS and i want to Dual boot that with Win 7.
    I dont have other computer to do my project.
    so, Is it safe to partition my local disk c and install Ubuntu in my lappy?
    do i hava to do sme thing for this.
    Please Guide me. Looking forward for a reply.
    thanks in advance!

    vasanthnanduri wrote:
    Hello! I am Vasanth.
    my laptop is HP Pavilion g6 2016tx. it runs on Windows 7 Home Basic!
    My college have given me a project on Linux OS and i want to Dual boot that with Win 7.
    I dont have other computer to do my project.
    so, Is it safe to partition my local disk c and install Ubuntu in my lappy?
    do i hava to do sme thing for this.
    Please Guide me. Looking forward for a reply.
    thanks in advance!
    Hi,
    Yes it is. You may try this: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/WubiGuide
    I prefer to repartition entire disk and then install a fresh Windows 7. It takes two partitions. Then create an extended one plus a small partition at the end for swap but it's not necessary as computers today have enough RAM and swap is basically pointless.
    Dv6-7000 /Full HD/Core i5-3360M/GF 650M/Corsair 8GB/Intel 7260AC/Samsung Pro 256GB
    Testing - HP 15-p000
    HP Touchpad provided by HP
    Currently on Debian Wheeze
    *Please, help other users with the same issue by marking your solved topics as "Accept as Solution"*

  • Setting up a "Dual Boot" system by adding Lion to an external HD

    I had originally thought to put my present Snow Leopard with Parallels OS's on an external HD the upgrading my internal HD to Lion in order to retain my Classic Application (AppleWorks in particular) capability for access to about a thousand old AppleWorks documents, all three genre-WP,SS,Graphics.  I just received my new hard drive and it suddenly occurreced to me that it would probably be better to add Mountain Lion to the external drive rather than fiddle with the setup/contents of my internal drive.
    In this regard, once I purchase Mountain Lion, what would be the procedures to create this dual boot capability after partitioning my External drive to receive Lion on one partition?
    Also, once the system is in place, how to move certain applications, and their associated document files, over to be used on Mountain Lion?
    Sparkgapper

    With Mountain Lion on the External, how does that creat a Dual Boot capability?
    I will not be doing anything to the internal drive with Snow Leopard other than setting up the dual boot.
    Sparkgapper

  • A VERY wierd booting problem: no dual boot nor boot from ide

    in reading the title, you're probably thinking that i haven't even booted successfully at all. in fact, my setup is a raptor 74GB (sata), seagate ide 200GB, and a seagate sata 400GB, and a western digital ide 80GB, with the raptor being the primary drive to boot from in the bios. in a normal boot state, my computer boots from the raptor and with absolutely no problems. the problem i'm having is twofold and i think they are related: firstly, if i load the setup for windows xp on the the 80GB (it's for a customer of mine), i set in the bios that it should load from the 80GB before the raptor and then i restart. before any boot happens it says that the boot failed and then attempts to run a few other boot agents, a couple by nvidia and one by intel (swear to god there intel in there, i dont know what it is doing on a amd board). i dont have the exact error written down but i fail to load from the ide. also, i have wanted to run a dual boot windows xp/fedora core 3 x86_64 from 2 different partitions on my raptor. fedora installs fine and when it comes time for a boot loader to ask me whether i want windows xp or fedora, the screen never shows and windows loads. i did install fedora after windows so the issue shouldnt be there. i am not technically disinclined, very much the opposite however it bugs me that i can't do any of this. my bios is the latest 1.40, my motherboard is the k8n neo2 platinum, proc 3500+, ocz plat rev.2, if any of this information is at all relavent.

    Quote from: JER101 on 12-February-05, 20:27:45
    Changing the boot order in the bios dosn't create a boot sector. All it does is define the order the motherboard will look for boot sectors.
    When ever youi install an OS it will create or modify a boot sector. You need to be aware of which disk it is modifying at the time.
    When installing for dual booting you have to know if the second OS can recognise the boot sector created by the previous OS. Some do not and delete the previous and create a new one just for that OS.
    I knew all that already, what i meant by changing the boot order was to allow the 80GB to be booted before the raptor, but if there's a dual boot on the raptor, clearly the bios wouldn't be able to detect that until it was time to boot. what I want to know is why when a boot sector is made for a dual boot or a boot sector is made for an ide hard drive, it doesnt go to the sata boot sector and in the case of the ide, it fails to boot completely.

Maybe you are looking for

  • HP laserjet 5100tn stopped working - networked

    I have a LJ5100tn and for some reason it just quit working.  It is installed in our small network.  I deleted the printer and reinstalled the drivers and I still get nothing.  When I go to add a printer and browse for networked printers the server se

  • Asset transfer from an affiliated company with depreciation

    Hello - Can you tell me how I can translate the following business scenario in SAP ? 1) An asset is purchased from an affiliated company. This company is represented as an inter-company vendor in our company code. 2) The initial value of the asset in

  • Account 12221001 requires trading partner to be filled

    Hi The user had some old documents and he is trying to clear them. During clearing he is facing an error "Account 12221001 requires trading partner to be filled" Trading partner field is blank in the reconciliation account 12221001 and also customer

  • Imac is taking a deep sleep

    I walked away from my Imac 24" Intel (white) yesterday and when I came back it seemed as though the Imac went into sleep mode (although its not set to go into sleep mode in my account). Anyways I hit the space bar and few other keys also tried mouse

  • How to show "Known As" field in ESS Personal info for GB

    Hi experts, we have a requirement where in we have to show the field "Known As" (technical field name RUFNM from info type 0002 Personal Details) in the ESS WDA applications for EHP6? I have gone through the thread http://scn.sap.com/thread/3348479 b