Mapping of material no with gl account & gl class

Dear All,
I have material no. & gl class, now i want gl account no. based on this criteria.
Does there is any table or method from which i can get.
Thanks with regards
Makarand

Check the table.
MSEG Document Segment: Material

Similar Messages

Re:material list with GL account

Hi All,
i have the requirement below.
how can i get the report material with Gl account.
Thanks & Regards
siva

Dear Mr Siva,
Please view link below;
http://wiki.sdn.sap.com/wiki/display/ERPLO/SAPStandardReports
You can use the Transaction ME2K and in dynamic selection for A/C category select the G/L account field and make it not equal to blank (by clicking in the field) and then enter the all cost center or whatever A/C object you are looking for in the field and run the report you will get list of all PO has the G/L account. Whereas in KSB1 report give the information about the PO for which some material document already posted. I mean to say, KSB1 include those PO which have PO history is present. what about those po for which no GR or IR has done. It may come in commitment report that is in KSB2.
Believe this could help you. TQ
rgds,
nantha

Material Type - with Account linking

Dear All,
            In my present client they have materials like Spares,General Stores,Consumables and in SAP i sugeested client thet we Mix all in to one as Miscellaneous Items.Is it ok and But my question is when we are using consumable material it has to go some consumption account at the time of PO
       And how to link all together with one account category reference.
             suggest me any one
Thanks,
Tiru

Hi,
You assign one ACR for the three mat. types
and you assign seperate valuation class to materials of each material type
you can assign diff GL accounts based on Mat type and Valuation class combination
ACR   VAL class   Mat type      material           gl account
0001      3000         mt1             m1                 300001
0001      3000         mt1             m2                 300002
0001     4000          mt2             m3                 400001
0001     4000          mt2             m4                 400002
Hope this will solve ur issue
Regards,

List of GL accounts mapped against Material

Hi
I want the List of Materials mapped against which GL accounts.
Can anybody help me out.
I will assign the points.
Regards
Kshipra G

Hi ,
There is no assignment like material to GL account in standard SAP. Every materials have it is own valuation class based valuation type ( Valuation classes vary for each valuation type). In Customization ,you can assign GL accounts against valuation classes.
First go to MBEW table and enter all material codes and execute where you can get the valuation classes against material codes.
Take that valuation classes and go to T030* Table where you can get the list of GL accounts.Like all BSX means :- Balances sheet inventory posting GL's ,WRX means :- GRIR Accounts.
Rgds
SumaMani

MAP Material hit Price difference account

Hi Experts,
Need your help urgently.
I gone through many threads but i did not got the solution.
Material Created with Moving average price, while implemented, uploaded the inital stock. Then created one Import PO for the same material in USD and book the delivery cost invoice in USD. Now We are booking the GRN but its going to price difference account. We have blocked price difference account for this material type.
Please suggest.

Hi,
It is standard behavior when stock value in document currency is not equal to the clearing value in document currency. The posting logic is well explained in the note: 191927 - Posting logic: GR for foreign currency PO and 308008 - FAQ: Posting logic: GR/IR clearing account Question 12
Regards,
AKPT

WAC - Sudden drop of MAP for material

Hi All
Kindly advice for below issue
I have a material "XXXX"
The moving average price(MAP) for this material in period 04 was $2000 in material master. and there is no qty.
In the period 05 the MAP dropped to 0.02(in the entire month only 3 transactions happned, 2 with movement type 511(Receipt of delivery without charge) for qty 1 each time and one transaction with movt type 512 for one qty.
Now the qty is one with MAP 0.02
Kindly advice
Thanks
Regards
Manju

Dear,
As a rule, against free of charge GR posting for material with MAP,
No accounts are credited or debited when the delivery free of charge is posted, since there is no change in value. The stock quantity of the material increases in the material master record, while the total value remains unchaged u2013 for this the moving average price automatically decreases.
Since you mentioned the MAP for material is 2000 and stock in NIL. Basing on the above you posted 1 quantity as free of charge and for this 1 quantity the MAP 2000 was deducted. As per me there is no problem, you can go ahead with postings. Next time when you receive the same material with charge the price automatically adjusted as required.
Regards,
Syed Hussain.

Issue with Payables Accounting Process

I have an issue right now with Payables Accounting Process. Is says:
Oracle Payables: Version : 11.5.0 - Development
Copyright (c) 1979, 1999, Oracle Corporation. All rights reserved.
APACCENG module: Payables Accounting Process
Current system time is 25-AUG-2009 13:23:41
+-----------------------------
| Starting concurrent program execution...
+-----------------------------
Arguments
P_START_DATE='2009/08/02 00:00:00'
P_END_DATE='2009/08/23 00:00:00'
P_JOURNAL_CATEGORY='All'
P_SUB_TRANSF_TO_GL='N'
P_SUB_JOURNAL_IMP='N'
P_VALIDATE_ACCTS='Y'
P_SUMMARIZE_FLAG='N'
P_COMMIT_CYCLE='50'
P_ORG_ID='81'
P_DEBUG_SWITCH='N'
P_TRACE_SWITCH='N'
P_RUN_ACCT_REPORT='N'
APPLLCSP Environment Variable set to :
Current NLS_LANG Environment Variable is :
American_America.UTF8
MSG-00002: Check that AX is not installed before calling the accounting engine
MSG-00003: AX is not installed, Calling the accounting engine
MSG-00004: After the call to AP_Accounting_Engine_Pkg.Do_Accounting
MSG-00005: Error occured in the accounting process
MSG-00006: Error Message: ORA-20100: File o0002869.tmp creation for FND_FILE failed.
You will find more information on the cause of the error in request log. occurred in
&CALLING_SEQUENCE
with parameters (&PARAMETERS)
while performing the following operation:
&DEBUG_INFO
REP-1419: 'beforereport': PL/SQL program aborted.
Report Builder: Release 6.0.8.20.2 - Production on Tue Aug 25 13:23:41 2009
(c) Copyright 1999 Oracle Corporation. All rights reserved.
Enter Username:
Program exited with status 1
Concurrent Manager encountered an error while running Oracle*Report for your concurrent request 820318.
Review your concurrent request log and/or report output file for more detailed information.
Executing request completion options...
Output is not being printed because:
The print option has been disabled for this report.
Finished executing request completion options.
Concurrent request completed
Current system time is 25-AUG-2009 13:23:43
I had a similar issue writing to the UTL_FILE_DIR with the AR Interface and was able to resolve that by checking the read/write permissions on the UTL_FILE_DIR sat in the init.ora. However, the strange thing here is I still get the same error for Payables Accounting Process.
Any insights would be greatly appreciated.
Thanks,
Don

This issue has been resolved. But the solution for me was totally unrelated to the error message that came up with this issue.
We had rollback issues in average and layer cost worker under Bills of Material. And after applying patch 3325415, this issue was also resolved.
This issue has been answered but if anyone has any ideas on how this issue got resolved by patch 3325415, i'd like to understand.
Thanks,
Don

Material ledger for lean accounting

Hi friends,
We are planning to implement ML for actual costing. The problem is client want to change their standard SAP process to a diff process. Instead of posting to Inventory B/S account when received goods, they want to debit to a P/L account and credit gr/ir. I am not sure how ML handles this, the other issue is during consumption to a production order, they don't want to hit the consumption account. They just want to do a goods movement with 261 type with quantity value (only material doc but no accounting doc) to production order. I am not sure if ML can look at this material document and calculates a $ value to have consumption.
Please help

Hi Sridhar,
Thanks for the reply. We were not clear on the design. Now we placed a design in place (not sure if this works). We r planning to do standard SAP procedure. 1) Dr. Inv (b/s) Cr gr/ir when goods are received and 2) Dr. Consumption Cr. Inv (b/s) when issued to Production order. The plan is to post additional entires during posting 1) like Dr. Purchased mat (p&l) Cr. Invent change (p&l). The main reason for this is management wants to look at the inv on p&l side (like dr. p&l account rather than inv b/s and dont want to touch that account for credits) but from ML perspective it will create problems so we are planning to follow standard and make additional posting in 2 p&l accounts which will total to zero.
Please let me know if you see any problems from ML side and also how can we make a setting to automatically do the extra posting when goods r received.
Thanks

Value mismatch in ME23N and MIRO for PO with multiple account assignments

Hello All,
I've a PO for indriect material procurement with no material master and I've a single PO item with Account Assignment Category as "K" (Cost Center) and Net Price as "1,357.91". Account Assignment has been distributed by percentage such that 50% goes to a cost center and the remaining 50% goes to another cost center.
When I do MIRO, the amount comes as "1.357,92". This is because, the actual PO price "1,357.91" is divided by 2 equal half due to multiple account assignment and the individual amount comes to 678.955. And this is rounded off to 678.96 and multiplied by 2 in MIRO and the final amount comes to "1357.92". So as you see, the variance between PO price and MIRO price is 0.01.
How to get rid of this variance? Can something be done to match the PO value and MIRO value the same?
Thanks for your inputs.
Sankar

HI Sankar,
This is a standard behaviour as Currencies with 2 decimals will be getting rounded off. One work around to avoid posting of Small differences in Invoices (DIF accounts) is to maually change the amount in the Account assignment in the Invoice line to match to PO line total.
Regards,
Kathir

Material to Material transfer with movement type 321

Dear Experts,
Material to material transfer with movement type 309, the system create a price difference account if price control "S"
but we transfer material to material with movement 321 (quality ), no price didderence account is generated, system showing different document
Exp--- Material "A" with STD price 150
Material "B" with STD price 100
document is created
Material A A/c. Credit 100
Material B A/c. Dr. 150
My question is, the price difference where is adjusting, is finance and costing books of account will effect.
Kindly help to solve the issue
Thanks & Regards,

Dear Wasim,
321 movement is to transfer the stock of a material lying in quality to unrestricted stock.
It's not used for material to material transfer.
Check and revert back.
Regards
Mangalraj.S

Functinality to compare two material price with reference to BOM in CO

Hi All,
Is there is any functionality in Controlling which can compare the costing for two FERT materials.
or
is there is any functionality where we can compare two material price with reference to BOM in controlling
Please help me to compare the material price with reference to BOM
Regards
nandu

Hi,
You can use this report to compare two itemizations. The report compares the characteristics item number, item category, cost element, resource, material, cost center, plant/work center, cost center/activity type, operation number, BOM item, assembly indicator, and cost component.
You can access this report as follows:
Accounting ® Controlling ® Product Cost Controlling ® Product Cost Planning ® Material Costing ® Cost Estimate with Quantity Structure or Cost Estimate Without Quantity Structure ® Compare
or
Accounting ® Controlling ® Product Cost Controlling ® Product Cost Planning ® Information System ® Object Comparisons ® For Material ® Itemization Comparison.
For Detail Please reffer following link:
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_46c/helpdata/en/56/abd108f1a611d28a950000e8214595/content.htm
Thanks and Regards
Binoj M D

Subcontracting child material issue with SO ref

Hi all,
As per the client business scenario we are using MTO for all production/purchase process, In between the production process the material also going to subcontract for some process and coming back as new material. As i mentioned earlier all material movement with ref to sale order only.
So, the child material in SO stock, created the subcontract PO through MRP by using Item cat - L and Account Assignment - M, with child material, system is recoganising the subcontract consumption with ref to SO in 543 mvt type. but while sending the material from plant through 541 system is not able to recoganise (since there is no special stock assigned in value string OMJJ).
How to make the Sale order reference as manditory while GI (541/542) and GR (101/102/543/544/545/546) of subcontracting.
Request your valuable suggestions
Regards
Sridharan

Hi,
Please refer below link...
http://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/scn/go/portal/prtroot/docs/library/uuid/a04ec1a0-c39b-2c10-6889-f6f69625f3f3?quicklink=index&overridelayout=true
Kuber

PO with multiple account assignments - non valuated / valuated GR

Hi Experts,
If I create a PO for goods with multiple account assignments the GR will not be valuated, but if I do the same for a service PO the GR will be valuated.
What is the reason for this?
Thanks in advance,
Francisco Melo

Hi,
There is more of a qualitative response to the issue, rather than quantitative, If you go through SAP Note 204252 for GR of material it says that: "We have not implemented this function since users who post goods receipts would have to determine the distribution to individual account assignment items during partial deliveries. Generally, users cannot or should not determine this.
An automatic distribution also causes problems and is also not implemented due to technical reasons".
Means basically here a stores guy is doing GR and he maynot be competent enough to decide on the Account assignment front.
However in general the service entry sheet is filled by departments who have got the work done, and are aware of the account assignment for that work.
Hope this is helpful for you.
Regards
Chandra Shekhar

GR Non-Valuated with multiple account assignment

Hi, gurus;
some knows a user exit or badi that is used to undercheck the flag GR Non-valuated when PO with multiple account assignment is created (ME21N) ? It can have some consequence in later invoice verification?
Thanks in advance
R.Z.

gr non valuated is done in case ur procuring the material for direct consumption so at the time of gr no posting to accounts occur but at the time of invoice recipet the system debits the g/l account and crdits the vendor account
this multiple account ***. is also necessary to mark with gr non valuated and gr check box so that u can change the account assignment at the time of invoice and that acc. assg. should also be changebale in backend .

Undeleting a PO line item with multiple account assignment and PO history

I am getting error message
PO history already exists (Multiple account assignment not possible)
Message no. MEPO841
When attempting to undelete a purchase order line item that has GR (nonvaluated) and Invoice postings.
Sequence of events.
PO line item was created with mutlitple account assignments ( 50/50 distribution) and GR nonval flags on.
Invoice Posted (blocked for payment)
GR done
PO line item marked for deletion.
Now getting MEPO841 when attempting to undelete.
Tried to Reverse GR and cancel material docuement - unable to do so - message no selectable items in PO
(even with check zero indicator )

Hello Dan ,
Error message MEPO 841 is only issued if you have Multiple account assignment function (MAA) activated. Multiple account assignment function is a new business function developed in Release 604.
If you have MAA active, you are not allowed to change a single account assigned PO which has GR posted to a multiple accounts assigned PO. If this is tried , MEPO 841 will stop you from doing this change.
If you want to have your old functionality in the lower release, you should switch off the business function LOG_MM_MAA_1 ( MM Multiple Account Assignment ) in Release 604.
Please switch the business function LOG_MM_MAA_1 off in test environment and test the problem again in a productive system.
I hope this information has been helpful in solving your problem. Please let me know if you have any further questions.
Thank you.
Best Regards,
Frank Farinella

Mapping of material no with gl account & gl class

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for