Material ledger for lean accounting

Hi friends,
We are planning to implement ML for actual costing. The problem is client want to change their standard SAP process to a diff process. Instead of posting to Inventory B/S account when received goods, they want to debit to a P/L account and credit gr/ir. I am not sure how ML handles this, the other issue is during consumption to a production order, they don't want to hit the consumption account. They just want to do a goods movement with 261 type with quantity value (only material doc but no accounting doc) to production order. I am not sure if ML can look at this material document and calculates a $ value to have consumption.
Please help

Hi Sridhar,
Thanks for the reply.  We were not clear on the design. Now we placed a design in place (not sure if this works). We r planning to do standard SAP procedure. 1)  Dr. Inv (b/s) Cr gr/ir when goods are received and 2) Dr. Consumption Cr. Inv (b/s) when issued to Production order.  The plan is to post additional entires during posting 1) like Dr. Purchased mat (p&l) Cr. Invent change (p&l).   The main reason for this is management wants to look at the inv on p&l side (like dr. p&l account rather than inv b/s and dont want to touch that account for credits)  but from ML perspective it will create problems so we are planning to follow standard and make additional posting in 2 p&l accounts which will total to zero. 
Please let me know if you see any problems from ML side and also how can we make a setting to automatically do the extra posting when goods r received.
Thanks

Similar Messages

  • Low market price using Material Ledger for FG

    Hi dear Experts,
    We are using Material ledger for valuating 1 FG material with out quantity structure and its goning well but in the opening of a new plant after the actual costing calculation with have to adjust the actual cost to the low market price if this is low than actual cost of the month, do you know which steps I have to follow to make this happen I read something about parallel valuations and determination of lowest cost but how I can Carryout this to inventory valuation?
    Regards

    Hi Ganesh thanks,
    the market priceI have to maintain on one of the prices available in the material master, this is necessary in addition to any configuration to use  the mrn0?
    and just a doubt this could re-valuate the inventory for the closing period? and the difference as I read its posted to the COGS account, on the  next period or in the  closing one?
    thanks a lot
    regards
    Omar

  • Material Ledger for two materials

    Hi,
    I need to run the Material Ledger for two specific materials. In CKMLCP not have the field to select the materials.
    In this case what should I do?
    hugs,
    Cristiane.

    Hi Cristiane,
    some steps in CKMLCP also have own transaction codes and these allow to be run fro selected materials
    CKMH Single-Level Price Determination
    CKMI post closing
    multi-level allows the material selection in the parameters when you go to edit - allow postprocessing options
    best regards, Udo

  • Material Ledger for Stock Transfer Postings

    Hi All,
    I have a question about the way material ledger is calculated for stock transfer postings (movement type 641). I will give an example to illustrate this issue:
    Material A has a Standard cost of $10
    Material B has a Standard cost of $8
    During the month 100 units were transferred from material A to Material B. This created a financial posting as follows:
    Credit Material A -          $1000                               
    Debit Material B -           $800
    Debit Price Difference    $200
    This price difference of $200 was used in the calculation of Actual cost for material B
    However, the Actual Cost for Material A was $9. I would have expected the system to use this actual cost to calculate the difference to be posted to material B. Hence the difference used in Material B should have been $100 {(9 – 8) X 100} and not $200.
    Has anyone had a similar issue, or know how the system resolves this (if at all)?
    Points will be rewarded for relevance.
    Thanks

    Dave, I see that your process is slightly different to mine. We do not revalue inventory at month end, instead the material ledger program posts the revalued amount to a reserve account and the actual cost is only a statistical entry. The material ledger calculation is reversed automatically in the new month and the standard price is used for valuation.
    I think this might make it difficult for the system to value STO's at actual. I may need to check with SAP.
    Thanks

  • How to activate material ledger field under accounting data

    Hi
    can any body give me solution for following
    i am creating a MIGO for capital Purchase order for (Project capital material-PROJ) with WBS ELEMENT.
    While clicking check button while doing migo error is showing
    "Material xxxx for plant xxxx material ledger not activated"
    when i am trying to change mode under accounting view
    ML ACTIVE FIELD is grey. How to activate this field.
    Please give me solution.
    Thanks
    Nirmal

    tx. OMX1

  • Material ledger accounting entries

    Dear All,
    i need material ledger related all accounting entries. I am confused with some entries.please do the needful urgent.
    regards
    K S Rangarajan

    Hi
    Material ledger/Actual costing updates the MM master at actual costs at period end.
    Let us give an accounting entry by way of an example
    Beginning inventory= 10 KG at $10= $100
    Goods receipt=15 kg at $11          = $165
    Total value         25 KG at $265 (unit price =10.60)
    However Inventory is valued at $250 because of Price control indicator S, thus there is a price difference (Dr) of $15
    On revaluation at period end, Dr Inventory $15
                                               Cr Price difference $15
    This is a simple case. Add to that exchange fluctuations, Invoice value resulting in price difference, etc. Assume a Goods issue of 12KG in the same period, it will be initially valued at $10, however on material price determination, this price difference of  $0.60 per unit is assigned to consumption as well.
    Hope you understand better
    S Jayaram

  • Looking for Best Practice Configuration Building Block for Material Ledger

    I need to configure and create the Material Ledger for a customer in the near future.  Could someone help me find the Best Practice Configuration Guide for Material Ledger?
    Thanks in advance!

    The official config is in Best Practices for Primary Steel
    there is a delta building block which contains Material Ledger configuration
    http://help.sap.com/bp_bblibrary/500/HTML/T02_EN_ZH.htm

  • Material Ledger Status for exisitng materials change

    Hi,
    What is the best way to perform material ledger closing entries for pre-existing materials in plant?
    I have a plant that already has pre-exisiting materials since 01/2009 or prior, and then we activated material ledger for this plant.
    Of course, we then try to run actual costing CKMLCP for these existing materials for period 05/2010, and is errored with
    "carry-out period-end closing for materials in previous period" message.  I try OSS note 361236 to close out periods that are older than previous period..with the MMPV period shift situation; but is not helping because these materials are already existing, so I can have CKM3 analysis for these materials as far back as 01/2006...as I ran report S_ALR_87013180 to check the period status for all these materials to see how far do i have to go back in terms of period/fiscal yr.
    My question is, if there are pre-existing materials active in the plant and then we activated ML, how far do I have to go back to get the CKMLCP done? Or what is the best way to handle such scenarios?
    any advice?

    Hey,
    Can you let me know when did you do the ML startup?
    At production start, the system automatically sets all materials to price determination control 2, which will not be included in ckmlcp processing.
    And when you change the price determination from 2 to 3 via CKMM, the period status will be automatically changed to "new object", for which there's no need to do the period end closing.
    Anyway, if your materials is with status 30 for the previous periods, the most convenient solution is to manually set it to 70 for the last period. You may achieve this via program MLHELP_SET_PP_STATUS_70. You only need to do it for the period before last period. Then you can go ahead with the normal period end closing process for the previous period.
    Best Regards
    Young

  • Any Material locked for transactions due to errors in Material Ledger?

    We are implementing Material Ledger for actual costing purpose. After ML implemention, will there be any situation due to errors in costing run, or otherwise, that the material is locked for any further transaction? Is such kind of threat exists under any situation?
    Sanjay

    Dear Sanjay,
    I don't think you will face any problem after succesfully completion of actual cost run.
    Situation can be totally opposite...I mean to say while costing run you might face problem of material locking.
    There could be problem if transaction in material is happening and same time cost run is going on. or if cost run is going on and the same time somebody is trying any transaction.
    It is always suggested to run cost cycle in the night or lock the user id's while cost run.
    Regards
    Rupesh Kumar Singh

  • Standard cost estimation after goods movement when material ledger is activ

    Hi!
    our client is activated material ledger, for some materials standard cost estimation is done till marking but not released.
    goods movements have been posted for those materials.
    Now system is not allowing to release the standar price for those material in the current period, as material ledger expects same price for entrie period.
    what is the alternative way to update the standard price for those materials ( with out reversing the goods movements).
    regs,
    ramesh

    Hi Ramesh,
    When you are using Material Ledger, after goods movemnets for materials, no need to change the standard cost estimate as Actual costing run will take care to derive the PUP price.
    If there is no standard cost estimation release for sold materials (e.g.FG), you will get an error message duirng the billing document release to accounting. To aviod this error, if you are using split valuation (valuation types) and mixing ratios (CK91N & CK94), try with the below steps:
    Create a new valuation type for the same material
    Crate CK11N & CK94,
    Run CK11N
    Run CK24.
    Then release the billing document.
    Let me know if you need more details.
    Thanks & Regards,
    ADI

  • Material ledger in material master

    hello friends
    how to remove the check from check box of material ledger in accounting view of material master it is shown in gray field. also price determination field is mandatory how to optional it.

    Hi,
    In the configuration the material ledger might be active in the valuation area.If it is active in the valuation area then the check box in the material master is automatically checked.
    If the material ledger is active for a particular valuation area, all materials in the valuation area are valuated using the material ledger.
    If you activate the material ledger for a plant, you should also activate it for all the other plants in the company code. This ensures that the accounts in Financial Accounting and Materials Management are reconciled.
    You can deactivate this in SPRO-Controlling -General controlling--Multiple valuation approaches-Basic settings-Check material ledger settings.
    But be careful about the controlling settings while changing this.
    Regards,
    Rambhupal reddy

  • UMB and GBB-BSA after run material ledger

    Hi guys,
    Last month the user changes in some materials standard-price by MR21. So the user had a debit balance in the 501002002 account (because MR21 uses UMB key of OBYC).
    After that the user run CKMLCP process and so he checked the balance in the 501002002. Aftel material ledger process the  account balance was changed for zero.
    Its occured because the GBB-BSA key used the same account determination of UMB key and GBB-BSA did a credit with the same amount in 501002002.
    My question is: Is it correct UMB and GBB-BSA key uses the same account?
    Many thanks,
    Ricardo Sanerip

    Absolutely agree with Ajay .. we use different GL account for BSA  and lock the GL account for further postings after implementation is completed ..
    Please change the GL account as suggested by Ajay also
    Regards
    Sarada

  • Missing connection of material to material ledger

    Hi,
    i am having a material without a accounting view.while posting invoice of this material in MIRO I am getting a error "Missing connection of material () in plant() to the material ledger.
    Error message:C+470
    Can you pl tell the reason for the error
    NS

    Hi,
    if the material type of the material concerned is configured for value updating you need to have an accounting view. The system does not know what to do with the price difference from MIRO without getting a price determination parameter for material ledger from the accounting view.

  • Error-Material Ledger currency were changed in material master creation

    Hi all,
    Iam trying to create a material master record in IDES database.
    When iam entering into accounting 1 tab system is throwing the following error "Material Ledger currency were changed".
    Without entering necessary information in the accounting tab i cannot proceed further , so kindly suggest me what is the necessary  setup that i need to do to avoid this error.
    Expecting a reply from you all.
    Thanking You
    Gopala

    Hi,
    In the configuration the material ledger might be active in the valuation area.If it is active in the valuation area then the check box in the material master is automatically checked.
    If the material ledger is active for a particular valuation area, all materials in the valuation area are valuated using the material ledger.
    If you activate the material ledger for a plant, you should also activate it for all the other plants in the company code. This ensures that the accounts in Financial Accounting and Materials Management are reconciled.
    You can deactivate this in SPRO-Controlling -General controlling--Multiple valuation approaches-Basic settings-Check material ledger settings.
    But be careful about the controlling settings while changing this.

  • Material price for semi finished.

    Dear All,
    What is the suggesatable price control for semi finished goods. i.e., either moving ave price or standard price.
    Regards,
    Venkat.

    Dear Venkat Ramana,
    <b>SAP recommends: </b>
    Price control <b>V</b> for <b>Raw materials</b> and <b>Trading goods</b>;
                       <b>S</b> for <b>Semi-finished products</b> and <b>Finished products</b>.
    You are required to valuate Semi-finished and Finished products with actual prices that correspond to the costs of the actual production, SAP recommends you use the function of the material ledger for this. Here, a periodic actual price is created that is calculated on a much more reliable basis than the moving average price. A so-called price limiter quantity is used. In addition, it is possible as of Release 4.5 to even take into account the variances of the actual prices of the Raw materials in the valuation of the Semi-finished and Finished products that are manufactured from it. 
    With regards,
    B.Ravindranath

Maybe you are looking for