Mapping Testing isssue

Hi All.
I am using If without esle , and while testing in mapping for the target fields , i can find the value in display queue , but it is result tab
please help me
thanking you
Sridahr

Hi,
Check the occurrences of the target fields. General rule is that:
1. for 0..unbounded or 1..unbounded, the values you want should be inside a single context.
2. for 0..1 or 1..1 use split by value

Similar Messages

In message mapping testing i'm getting this Error

hi,
in message mapping testing i'm getting this error.. can u plz explain what is this error.. and how can i solve this error..
12:27:47 Start of test
Source code has syntax error: D:/usr/sap/XID/DVEBMGS10/j2ee/cluster/server0/./temp/classpath_resolver/Mapf3292850763411dcbfab0013726698e1/source/com/sap/xi/tf/_TRNG_TEST_4_IM_RECEIVERS_.java:72: illegal start of expression </textarea> ^ D:/usr/sap/XID/DVEBMGS10/j2ee/cluster/server0/./temp/classpath_resolver/Mapf3292850763411dcbfab0013726698e1/source/com/sap/xi/tf/_TRNG_TEST_4_IM_RECEIVERS_.java:73: ';' expected } ^ 2 errors Source code has syntax error: D:/usr/sap/XID/DVEBMGS10/j2ee/cluster/server0/./temp/classpath_resolver/Mapf3292850763411dcbfab0013726698e1/source/com/sap/xi/tf/_TRNG_TEST_4_IM_RECEIVERS_.java:72: illegal start of expression </textarea> ^ D:/usr/sap/XID/DVEBMGS10/j2ee/cluster/server0/./temp/classpath_resolver/Mapf3292850763411dcbfab0013726698e1/source/com/sap/xi/tf/_TRNG_TEST_4_IM_RECEIVERS_.java:73: ';' expected } ^ 2 errors
12:27:48 End of test
thanks
Babu

BABU,
In your message mapping correct the UDF code.
There is a problem in your textarea and you have missed to place semi colon ";".
Regards,
Sarvesh

Strange error in mapping test: Structure with min!=max without mapping

Hi,
a very simple mapping: flatfile 2 Idoc.
in mapping test I'm trying to test it. but I get always a strange error warning:
11:25:12 Teststart Mapping-Objekt MM_XXXXX2WGSREQ is not completely designed. The execution is impossible.
Structure with min!=max without mapping
11:25:12 Testende
What for a problem?
Thanks for any hints!
Regards
Rene

Hi Rene,
Check the mapping of 1:n occurence and 0:n occurence nodes.
you can find the node in yellow color in the map level.
Regards,
Harish

ABAP Mapping - Testing - IDoc - Trouble

Hi Friends,
There is one ABAP Mapping used in our system. The outbound interface is based on one message in external definition and inbound interface is IDoc.
When I try to test this mapping in our PI System using the transaction "SXI_MAPPING_TEST", in the initial screen/input screen in F4 help for the Sender Interface selection, our outbound interface is not displayed. In the Receiver Interface also, it is not display the IDoc.
What could be the problem ? How to test our Z class in this case with the input XML.
Could you please help me?
Kind regards
Jegathees P.

Hi,
don't use SXI_MAPPING_TEST
use my report which is much better
XI/PI: Easy ABAP mapping tests - no more SXI_MAPPING_TEST
BTW
there is no need to use any HTTP client nor anything to test ABAP mapping - just my report
Regards,
Michal Krawczyk

Test XML file and Message Mapping test tab not compatible

Hi all,
I need help in testing in message mapping test tab.
I have a xml data taken from SXMB_MONI which looks lik below
&?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?>
-&ns0:MT_Order xmlns:ns0="http://test.com/xi/test">
-<Header>
      <fld1>
      <fld2>
    -<Line>
        <line1>
and in message mapping multimapping is used,so it looks like
ns0:Messages xmlns:ns0="http://sap.com/xi/XI/SplitAndMerge">
   <ns0:Message1>
      <ns1:KVNR_Senden_MT xmlns:ns1="urn:lsv.de/SENDER">
         <Inhalt>
            <KE/>
            <VF/>
            <BBNRAB/>
            <BBNREP/>
how can test this xml in message mapping test tab?please don't consider the structure .I don't have them.So,i have pasted some dummy structure

Try like this,
ns0:Messages xmlns:ns0="http://sap.com/xi/XI/SplitAndMerge">
<ns0:Message1>
<&ns1:MT_Order xmlns:ns0="http://test.com/xi/test">
<Header>
      <fld1>
      <fld2>
    -<Line>
        <line1>

Message Mapping vs Interface Mapping test tabs giving different results.

Hi all,
I am developing an interface that always requires an output file to be created (even if there is no data). I have found a way to change my select statement in the JDBC sender to initiate the message even if there isn't any data (using UNION select -1 ID, '' col1, '' col2, etc.) and that seems to work fine. I then put logic in the message mapping to suppress the row that contains the -1 ID value, which would result in an empty file when there is no other data, and should result in a file containing only the correct data when there is data.
So, my problem: I am always getting empty files with this logic. I tested the logic in the message mapping test tab and it worked perfectly, however when I test it using the interface mapping test tab it results in what becomes an empty file!
My source and destination structures are fairly simple:
Root
--row
ID
col1
col2
The logic I use to suppress the ID = -1 row is:
=removeContexts([]ifWithoutElse([keepss=true]Not([]equalsS([]ID, Constant([value=-1]))), SplitByValue([type=Each value]row)))
Obviously, I'm stumped - any help would be appreciated!
Edited by: Mike Morrison on Sep 23, 2010 5:04 PM

Hi Mike,
Can you quote the error log..u r getting error in message mappin or interface mapping?
Please suggest the test results for both the mappings.
Thanks,
Sushama

Mapping test throughs exception for UDF that does'nt exist anymore

Hello everybody,
my mapping test throughs an exception for a UDF that I deleted?
Any ideas?
Regards Mario

Hi Mario,
   Sometimes XI Mapping test may throw an Error if any of the other UDF is having errors.
   So please do the following and check whether you are able to run mapping test.
   1. Check all the UDF for any syntax errors/import stmt error etc.
   2. goto Edit mode and do some dummy changes (Like changing UDF Description etc) and activate and check again.
Regards,
Ananth

Interface mapping test successful, throws exception in BPM

Hi.
We are having a problem with an Interface mapping which works when
tested in Integration Builder, but throws an Exception when it is part
of the Transformation in a BPM.
The scenarion is such:
1. The sender calls the outbound interface using a web service.
2. XI uses the input and passes to the Integration Process
3. In the BPM, a LOGON message is built to call the web service as
specified by an external web service . The input and
output messages are just a single string, in which the other XML is
embedded.
4. XI receives a response from the web service call
5. XI Extracts the sessionId from the response and combines it with the
initial input (Step 1) to create the query for the query message in
the web service.
It is in Step 5 where the transformation fails, with an Exception in
the DefaultTrace.trc as
Runtime exception occurred during execution of application mapping program com/sap/xi/tf/_MM_LogonResponse_PropertySearchRequest_to_ExternalRequestSOAP_: com.sap.aii.utilxi.misc.api.BaseRuntimeException; RuntimeException in Message-Mapping transformation: Cannot produce target element /ns0:Messages/ns0:Message1/ns1:EXTERNAL/REQUEST. Check xml instance is valid for source xsd and target-field mapping fulfills requirements of target xsd
Thrown:
MESSAGE ID: com.sap.aii.ibrun.server.mapping.rb_MappingRuntimeException.EXCEPTION_DURING_EXECUTE
com.sap.aii.ibrun.server.mapping.MappingRuntimeException: Runtime exception occurred during execution of application mapping program com/sap/xi/tf/_MM_LogonResponse_PropertySearchRequest_to_ExternalRequestSOAP_: com.sap.aii.utilxi.misc.api.BaseRuntimeException; RuntimeException in Message-Mapping transformation: Cannot produce target element /ns0:Messages/ns0:Message1/ns1:EXTERNAL/REQUEST. Check xml instance is valid for source xsd and target-field mapping fulfills requirements of target xsd
I have extracted the data from the initial request (step 1) and the
logon response (step 4) and using these I have tested the Interface
Mapping. There is no problem with this and the tests are successful.
From what I can see, because the Response field in the LOGONResponse
contains more XML tags, XI must be parsing it and assuming the tags are
tags in the message, and not just the string, thus it is complaining
that the XSD types do not match. This extra XML Parsing does not take
place in the Interface Mapping Test.
I have put the response into a User Defined Function which just has one
line "return new String("Hello")" and that fails. However, if this UDF
does not have the Response as the input, it does not complain.
Please advise.
--Reenal

hi
You will have to use specific replacements for you xml tags if it is coming as a paramter
replace '<' with <
replace '>' with >
for eg: I want to pass <TakeIt>200</TakeIt> as value to Element <A>
Mapping won't work if it is passed like
a) <A><TakeIt>200</TakeIt></A> - Wrong
Instead the replace the angle brackets
b) <A><TakeIt>200</TakeIt></A> - Correct
While testing the mapping in IR (a) will work bcoz the test tool will convert it to (b) format. Check the xml source in test tool.
So ensure the web response is like (b)
rgds,
Arun

Mapping tested successfully in Simulator but fails in SXI_MONITOR

Hi gyus,
The Outbound message structure is the following:
MT_CAP_BANKS
actions     1..1    xsd:string
RECORD   0..unbounded Segment
   Field1
   Field2
   etc
The target Inbound message structure is the structure of the JDBC receicer adapter, since the scenario is Proxy to JDBC.
MT_DB_BANKS
STATEMENT       1..unbounded
DBSTATEMENT   1..1
   action
   etc
I want to have one STATEMENT per RECORD segment. But the RECORD segment may also be missing in case that we want to do massive delete of all the entris in a table. So I may have only the action field in some test cases.
Therefore, I am mapping RECORD>mapWithDefault>STATEMENT.
Mapping is tested successfully in simulator for all cases, either many RECORD segment or no RECORD segment. Interface mapping tested successfully. However, when we are doing real tests, mapping works fine with many RECORD segments, but fails with no RECORD segments (Cannot produce target element /ns0:MT_DB_BANKS/STATEMENT. Check xml instance is valid for source xsd and target-field mapping fulfills requirements of target xsd).
Any ideas ?
I also tried to chang the mapping with IF RECORD EXISTS THEN STATEMENT='' ELSE RECORD-->STATEMENT but problem still remains!!

Hi,
I'm not really sure why you are encountering this error. Have you tried any context modifications before mapping to field STATEMENT?
Could you try this mapping?
constant:null -----------------------------------------> \
RECORD --> mapWithDefault:null --> equalsS:null --> ifThenElse --> STATEMENT
constant:hasValue -------------------------------------> /
The code should perform just like the one with the mapWithDefault without the ifThenElse, but it's worth to try.
Hope this helps,

Poor performance in Repository mapping test tool (7.0.12)

Hi,
I'm just looking for some hints for performance tuning the Mapping tool in the Repository. This is our Development machine.
Seems to be significantly worse since upgrade from sps 10 to sps 12.
Every "display queue" / recompile of the map takes almost 5 minutes.
The Java stack currently has about 4gb of heap, abap 1gb. We reallocated a large amount from abap to java which temporarily alleviated the problem (about 60% quicker), but it's back after a few days. There is currently no possibility of adding more memory.
The problem seems to be noticable primarily with the IB, hence I'm looking for any performance tuning tips that would directly affect this. I'm thinking that we need to concentrate on the Java stack. I've looked at note 894509 and SAP NetWeaver Process Integration Tuning Guide and not seen anything directly related at first glance.
I've deactivated end-to-end monitoring.
The only thing that stands out is a significant amount of activity on the disk with the sap/oracledb/oracleexec on it. It's about 9 times greater than the amount of swap. Two processes seem to be regularly at the top of CPU usage dw.sapPID_DVEBMGS14 and /usr/sap/PID/DVEBMG.
Hints and tips appreciated. As I said, hardware changes are not possible at this time.
Thanks
James.
Yes, points will be awarded where appropriate.

Are you gacing this issue only when you test the mapping in the IR or even in the runtime?
I have also noticed that mapping test in the tool in IR always take a long time, but as they never reflect the runtime mapping perfromance I have always ignored it.
A few reasons might be,
1. Low RAM on the Machine being used by you.
2. Too Many applications!
Remember you are Connecting to the server from your IR using JWS and so the resources on your machine also matter quite a bit.
If completely off track , ignore the reply.
Regards
Bhavesh

Help with XI mapping/testing

Hi!
I just went thru the following exercise:
/people/james.guanzon/blog/2006/02/22/how-to-support-industry-standards-in-xi-part-i-of-iii--interfaces
/people/james.guanzon/blog/2006/03/23/how-to-support-industry-standards-in-xi-part-ii-of-iii--mapping
/people/james.guanzon/blog/2006/09/09/how-to-support-industry-standards-in-xi-part-iii-of-iii--config-test
I have found that I can not successfully go thru the last link because it
has a lot of gaps.
If somebody can help straighten out the last link, I appreciate.
Is there any even simpler example for XI mapping/testing, for
different combinations , e.g. file to file, file to RDBMS, etc.
Points guaranteed. Thanks!

Hi Jennifer,
you got a wrong understanding of mapping.
The kind of sender/receiver (file, DBMS, SOAP etc) is without any influence to the mapping.
Relevant is the structure the message was send.
Best is goto SAP help and exercise the mappings
http://sapdoku/netweaver4sp9/helpdata/DE/d2/58cd3b11571962e10000000a11402f/content.htm
Regards Mario

Config Test Failing in Mapping test

HI,
When I am executing config test in ID for an interface it is failing in Interface determination and mapping test. It does not giving any log.
Now the mapping for this is multimapping and used enhances Interface determination.
I tries with Payload XML both with and without the additional message message1 wrapper that gets generated for multimapping but am getting the same error.
Any idea if the config test is supposed to behave that way only for multimapping.
Thanks and Regards,
Himadri

Hi Prateek,
I am afraid this is not the answer.
Let me add the additional info.., the interface is working fine.....
However the config test fails... So there can not be any mistake with the interface,.
Also I have cross checked before posting.. this is not a cache problem...
THanks for the links though
Thanks,
HImadri
null
null

Error when testing from Message mapping test tab

Hi Experts,
I am wondering that when i test the message in the MM test tab its giving error and target message is not generating. I am not testing end to end then why it is triggering communication channel?
I can see that the 'RFC_Alert_Service_RFC_Receive' communication channel is in Red color RWB--> communication channel monitoring. I even even refreshed the cache and also activated the RFC channel but no use.
Below are the error details:
Error when testing message from test tab of mapping -->
java.lang.RuntimeException: Exception during processing the payload.Problem when calling an adapter by using communication channel RFC_Alert_Service_RFC_Receiver (Party: , Service: RFC_Alert_Service, XI AF API call failed. Module exception: 'error while processing the request to rfc-client: com.sap.aii.af.rfc.afcommunication.RfcAFWException: RfcAdapter: receiver channel has static errors: can not instantiate RfcPool caused by: com.sap.aii.af.rfc.RfcAdapterException: error initializing
Error in Communication channel monitoring -->
Receiver channel 'RFC_Alert_Service_RFC_Receiver' for party '', service 'RFC_Alert_Service'
Error can not instantiate RfcPool caused by:
com.sap.aii.af.rfc.RfcAdapterException: error initializing RfcClientPool:com.sap.aii.af.rfc.core.repository.RfcRepositoryException: can not connect to destination system due to: com.sap.mw.jco.JCO$Exception: (103) RFC_ERROR_LOGON_FAILURE: Password logon no longer possible - too many failed attempts.
Please help me how can i resolve this issue to successfully test the message in mapping-test tab.
Regards,
Suresh.

> Error in Communication channel monitoring -->
> Receiver channel 'RFC_Alert_Service_RFC_Receiver' for party '', service 'RFC_Alert_Service'
> Error can not instantiate RfcPool caused by:
> com.sap.aii.af.rfc.RfcAdapterException: error initializing RfcClientPool:com.sap.aii.af.rfc.core.repository.RfcRepositoryException: can not connect to destination system due to: com.sap.mw.jco.JCO$Exception: (103) RFC_ERROR_LOGON_FAILURE: Password logon no longer possible - too many failed attempts.
Unlock the user you are using in the RFC channel and provide the correct password in the channel configuration. Once the channel error is resolved you would be able to test the Mapping sucessfully...
>>why it is triggering communication channel?
You would be using RFC lookup in the mapping....
~SaNv...
Edited by: Santhosh Kumar V on Jul 8, 2009 5:48 PM

Unable to test in message mapping test tab

hi all,
below is my message mapping test tab structure
and my xml file looks like below
I am unable to test this data in test tab of message mapping and my source structure becomes red

Hi Hareesh,
I tried what you said but not working

Source code has syntax error in SAP PI7.1 Mapping Test

HI All,
IN SAP P7.1 created simple two data types, message types and Message Mapping with only 2 fields. While testing the mapping in Message Mapping it is giving the error as
Source text of object Message Mapping: MM_Source_to_Target | http://abc.com has syntax errors:
Source code has syntax error:
I am able to activate the Datatypes and Message Types but not able to activate the Messge mapping.
Please if any body faced the same problem please give the solution.
One more thing is I am able to test the Message Mapping available in BASIS 7.1 Software Component objects. It is executing successfully...
but otherthan this SWC it not working success fully.....
Regards
Sridhar Goli

Hi David,
please check the default trace. It may contain the entry:
Error in compiling : java.io.IOException: Not enough space
If that's the case, maybe there's too little space for the swap file/device.
You should ensure that at least 2X (preferably 3X) of Heap (-Xmx) is configured as real swap
Hope that helps.
Regards,
Gábor Klauzer

Mapping Testing isssue

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for