Mass Write Off - When Funds Management is active

Hi All,
I am working for ISU project and  we have a business requirment to do Mass Write Off. We are not able to do it as Funds Management is active.
We had  to activate Funds management as we need to send fund related information to Peoplesoft, which is the reporting engine for the client.
We are  encountering this error:
Write-off over several fiscal years
Message no. FKKFMCHK038
Diagnosis
You are posting a document similar to a write-off that writes off documents from several fiscal years. This is not possible with the transaction used if Funds Management is active.
If anyone can throw some light on how to slove this, it would grealy help me.
Thanks,
Lalitha

Hi Lalitha,
The reason can be a commitment item with a wrong financial transaction. Therefore please check
the relevant bank clearing account and the assigned commitment item.
The commitment item should have financial transaction 90 in transaction FMCIA.
In the long text of SAP note 686383 you'll find more information regarding this topic. The point 3 under limitations is very
important for the described situation.
I believe this will help you.
Best Regards,
Vanessa.

Similar Messages

  • SAP IS-Media: Mass write-off leads to reversal of already paid billing document

    Hi All,
    We have business issue in IS-Media as below
    While doing mass write-off using transaction code FP04M, already existed payment document for that particular cycle is getting reversed.
    we can see payment reversal document under liability account - payments tab of the order.
    We know this is not specific to particular customer.
    We would like to understand why while doing write off, already existed payment document is getting reversed. We request experts to help us on this at the earliest.
    Looking forward to hear from you.
    Regards,
    Muneendra

    Hi Tim,
    Thank you very much for your answer. When we run the monitoring process program RJKREMIND01, the system generates reversal billing documents to reverse billing documents from orders that have not been paid. This happens when the orders are in the closure monitoring level. The reversal document set in customizing isn't suitable in this case due to fiscal reasons, so we need to change the reversal billing document when we run RJKREMIND01.
    Thanks and regards, Renato

  • MASS write off in 4.6C

    Hi All,
    We have many hundreds of A/R accounts with balanaces in excess of 365 days where the balances can be measured in pennies. Manually writing these off is far too time consuming. Is it possible to MASS write off.
    Thanks for your help.
    I guess  "Periodic Processing > For Contract Accounts > Write-Off Run" is only available in ECC6.0.
    PK

    HI,
    FP04M has the following user exits,
    FKYA001X            Customer exit for format AT_DOM (header)         
    FKYA002X            Customer exit for format AT_DOM (payment record) 
    FKYA003X            Customer exit for format AT_DOM (trailer)        
    have you tried with them?
    Regards,
    Anirban

  • Mass Write Off

    Our need is Mass Write Off. Transaction used for this is FP04M.
    But the problem is that we are not able to find out any standard BAPI or Function Module for this.
    Also we tried this using BDC approach but still we are not able to record complete process.
    So is there any FM or BAPI which you know which will suite to solve this problem or can you suggest how to record exactly?
    And also the other requirement is to write off from clarification work list.
    For this, which transaction should we use? FPCUM or FPCPL?
    Because in transaction FPCPL if we select item for clarification list then we can send them for write off. Here are the screen shots attached.

    HI,
    FP04M has the following user exits,
    FKYA001X            Customer exit for format AT_DOM (header)         
    FKYA002X            Customer exit for format AT_DOM (payment record) 
    FKYA003X            Customer exit for format AT_DOM (trailer)        
    have you tried with them?
    Regards,
    Anirban

  • Enhancement for mass write off ?

    hi frens,
    I have to write an enhancement in FPCUM/FP04M for mass write off on perticular conditions :
    1) write off any credit item older than x months
    2) where credit balance claimed/unclaimed for more than 'X' months
    3) if greater ....proceed and keep a log.
    4) Add fields of no. of months and dates
    there are few more conditions, But i m not getting how to proceed,
    Please help.
    thanks
    Saket

    HI,
    FP04M has the following user exits,
    FKYA001X            Customer exit for format AT_DOM (header)         
    FKYA002X            Customer exit for format AT_DOM (payment record) 
    FKYA003X            Customer exit for format AT_DOM (trailer)        
    have you tried with them?
    Regards,
    Anirban

  • Fund mangement is active

    Dear All,
    In our Organization Fund management is activated all ready, Now we are implementing PS module coz of Fund management we could not able to create PR through PS and Budget also through Fmderiver we are assigning Budget for WBS .
    When we Generate PR in CJ20n It is showing- Error in Commitment Check(Coz of fund management activation), If we need to create PR user has to Use ME51N not in CJ20n, Kindly suggest me
    Thank you,
    Regards,
    Naveendra

    Understand that user has selected wrong G/L while creatin the PO , since the last financial year is closed you can not reverse the MIGO noe.
    for smplicty let  we assue that "X" was the correct G/L and "Y" was the wrogn G/L
    Becasue in MIGO transcations, the wrong G/L is already being debited we can not have much to do in this case.
    You can do the MIRO of the vendor and post the manual JV.
    Y G/L credit to
    X G/L debit.
    Thanks,
    Vikas Rander.

  • Funds Management-PO field status

    Hi,
    When Funds Managemnet is Active so while creating Purchase order without account assignment K,in account assignment tab Fund center and commitment item fields used to appear so my question is how make these fields as in display.
    Another issues is that my client want cost center field should appear in same screen without account assignmnet K.
    Give some solution for the above.
    Deepa

    hi
    Check in the following path where you can change the field status for purchasing documents
    SPRO - MATERIAL MANAGEMENT - PURCHASING - ACCOUNT ASSIGNMENT - MAINTAIN ACCOUNT ASSIGNMENT CATERGORIES.
    thanks and regards

  • Amount for budget in funds management

    Hi
    In case of internal order, we give create internal order first then we give budget amount in KO22.
    Similarly, where we have to give budget amount in case of funds management. I have given fund, commitment item and fund center in FB60. But budget check was not done. entry was posted.
    Please let me know how to use funds management. I have configured. But how to use it effectively, let me know.

    Hi,
    Funds Management is activated in your company when:
    1 - You have activated Funds Management functionality (Enterprise Extension EA-PS is activated in transaction code SFW5
    2 - and flags "Account Assignment Derivation" and/or "Activate Update in Funds Management" are activated in customizing path PSM -> Funds Management Government -> Actual and Commitment Update/Integration -> Activate/Deactivate Funds Management").
    The checkbox 'Update' should be marked for your company code
    Please also check these important notes:
    1082741  Migration to ERP 6.0 (EA-PS 6.00)
    429225   Migration FI-FM to SAP R/3 Enterprise Publi
    666322   Derivation tool in the FM: Trace function
    966093   FMDERIVE: Result display as of Release EA-PS 6.00
    839488   Derivation of commitment item from G/L account
    I suggest you to read also the documentation available in the following menu:
    SPRO -> Public Sector Management -> Funds Management Government -> Prepare Funds Management Installation
    It is only a text document but with links and with all the necessary instructions to start FM in your company.
    I hope that this helps to resolve your issue.
    Best Regards,
    Vanessa Barth.

  • Budget-fund management issue

    Fund Management is active for 1000 and 4000 company codes.
    Accordingly we have created budgets for year 2010 and raised number of
    PR/POs against this budget up to 31.03.2011.
    There are certain POs (Open POs) raised on or before 31.03.2011
    against which services/goods received on or after 01.04.2011.  At the
    movement system is checking 2011 budget for the POs raised against
    2010 budget, as we have not done the closing operation for FM module.

    Hi Alex,
    I have checked In EKPO table field BEDAT is not available but AEDAT is there date 28.03.2011. FM document was not posted for the PO, while posting MIRO document, we are getting error message * Annual budget exceeded for the year 2011 amount 10000*.
    Po's are posted in the previous fiscal year and invoice entering in the current year.
    Thanks,
    Ratnam

  • Issue when activing Global Funds Management Function(PSM-FM)

    Hi Peers,
    I tried to active Global Funds Management Function(PSM-FM) in IMG. A message "Aktivierung des Haushaltsmanagements ist nicht erlaubt" poped up. And I also only have read access to “Active/Deactive Funds Management” but SU53 shows authorization check is ok.
    What should I do for next? Thanks
    Regards,
    Eunice

    Hi,
    I am facing the same issue regarding "Read Access Only" to the activation of Funds Management under Actual and Commitment Update/Integration.
    I've checked the component activation and found that
    1) ES-PS is activated under SPRO
    2) IS-PS is checked under BF11, but the checkbox status is greyed, so that it's impossible to change it.
    I've tried to delete the IS-PS entry and re-insert it...the action was successful but the issue remained...
    Any clues?
    Thanks

  • After Funds Management activation we got error in travel managment

    Hi All,
      After activating funds management in the system, while creating a travel request we got the following error. Anyone can help on this, for idenifying the problem.
    In the travel request portal we are getting this error :
    " com.sap.tc.webdynpro.modelimpl.dynamicrfc.WDDynamicRFCExecuteException:      No expense type for estimated costs has been defined. Cannot save   , error key: RFC_ERROR_SYSTEM_FAILURE     and          No expense type for estimated costs has been defined. Cannot save   , error key: RFC_ERROR_SYSTEM_FAILURE "
    regards,
    Sabari Prabhu.

    Hi
    I have a question, I udnerstand in (Create one expense type "Estimated Costs") but my question is in using transaction
    When you start using the trip transaction and select a travel request the system send you to the TP04 transaction... now
    with this new function, I have to use the transaction PR05 its right? becouse the TP04 ask the VORS expense type, and sap says to dont delete record
    Please could you tell me with wich transaction you start to create a travel request? I have the same problem of the screen but Im not sure to use the TP04 transaction wit this solution
    Thanks a lot

  • Unable to do the restriction at Fund Center or FM Area when FM is not activ

    Hi,
    we have the following business requirement:
    Background of the issue:
    Field Status variant in Account Assignment category and GL:
    We are in the process of rolling out one of our company codes which is
    in a different instance(server).
    We already have some 130+ company codes running in a different
    instance. This is a kind of Instance consolidation to bring all systems
    under one instance.
    Funds Management has been activated in the company code for which we
    are carrying out the rollout. FM has not been activated for the
    existing company codes.
    Now, the issue is with regard to the field status variants, which can
    be controlled at the company code level and which cannot be controlled
    which is at the client level.
    (i)     The existing company codes have a field status variant which
    has the field status groups having the fields Commitment items and
    Funds center in Suppress mode in the existing instance.
    (ii)     The company to be rolled out has the field status variant which
    has field status groups having the fields Commitment items and Funds
    Center in Optional mode.
    (iii)     On the other hand, there is yet another field status control
    for the Account assignment objects like Cost center, WBS elements, etc.
    in the MM-FI integration area. This is at client level and at present
    the same has the status of u201CSuppressu201D for Commitment items and Funds
    Center. We have changed the same to u201COptionalu201D for the purpose of
    testing the proposed roll out in our existing instance.
    In that case, the status of GL account assignment in above is
    clashing with our client level field status as described in (iii)
    above. As a result, we are forced to change the field status in
    above to optional mode for our existing company codes which we do not
    intend to do.
    When only one company within a group of companies is activated with FM,
    I feel that:
    (i)     At the client level, there is no option for me other than to
    keep the Funds center and commitment items in optional mode
    (ii)     At the GL level, I should be able to keep my field status in
    Suppress mode (If FM is not activated) and in Optional mode (If FM is
    activated) and SAP should be able to take care of the clash in the
    field status at the transaction level in such a scenario.
    The issue is we are able to control the access if FM is activated for a particular company code, where as we are unable to control the access for other company codes where FM is not activated and FM Area is not linked.
    We tried to use the BADI ME_PROCESS_REQ_CUST, but this is applicable for POs only.
    Please look into this  issue and help us in meeting our business requirement.
    Thanks & Regards,
    Ramakrishna

    Hi Justin,
    Thanks for the extra points.
    Copy and save this bold text some where
    /Applications/iChat.app/Contents/MacOS/iChat -errorLogLevel 7
    This needs to be run in Terminal.
    iChat needs to be shut down to do so.
    Just paste it in Terminal after the Welcome to Darwin message and hit enter.
    It will launch iChat and create an on-going log in the Terminal window.
    You will see the reference to the Harware rules.plist
    Further down you will see the bandwidth found by iChat, followed by the number of Audio and Video Buddies that you can support.
    It goes on.....
    It makes a note of the router that you are connected to.
    After that it will end up lists listening checks until you connect to a Chat.
    This makes this a useful way to find out what iChat can see at it's startup.
    To Stop - Quit iChat in the Normal way.
    Save the Log in a Text editor of some sort. (Post here if required).
    Then Quit Terminal.
    It is a useful tool to highlight some things in the start up phase, (And a reminder to look in specific places) when you think you have looked at all the settings.
    8:12 PM Wednesday; November 15, 2006

  • Global Funds Management - Error on activation

    I am trying to activate Global Funds Management functions.  However, I notice a very strange situation.  After activating it, when I try to post a FI Document, system is saying "Enter a leading ledger".  I had already defined leading and non-leading ledgers in the New GL.  If I deactivate the Global Fund Management functions again, I am able to post the document and the same error message is not appearing.

    Hello,
    Please tell me about your system condition. Is your ecc 6.0 also implement Public Sector component, and the relevant consultant already activated public sector management component in SPRO? Usually de-activate leading ledger 0L cause by activated this component.
    It is the behavior system once Global PSM -FM activated it create new total table FMGLFLEXT, and customer free to use either FAGLEFLEXT or FMGLFLEXT.
    If you want to use/activate again 0L then you can programt via SE38. Run the program FMGL_CHANGE_APPL_IN_LEDGER.
    Leading ledger 0L will come back again.
    Also you can get more information on note 840783

  • Error while Activating Activate Global Funds Management Functions (PSM-FM)

    Hi,
    I am getting the below error while activating Activate Global Funds Management Functions (PSM-FM) in Funds Management.
    Aktivierung des Haushaltsmanagements ist nicht erlaubt
    Message no. ZZ003
    Kindly help me in fix this issue....
    Thanks
    Kishore

    Hi,
    Thanks for your reply. But can you clarify me why we need to delete the row Z_LEAVE in SE11 for FMISPS table. Because here ABAPER is objecting to do this as they feel there may be some impact if we delete this.
    Kindly clarify me
    Thanks
    Kishore

  • GL account linkage with activity group for AVC- Funds management

    Hi,
    I have activated (BCS) funds management in my system. My client wants that system will give error message for some expense GL accounts and for other expense GL accounts it will only give information message.
    For that i have created new activity group for AVC but i have no idea how we can link GL accounts with activity group for AVC.
    Request immediate help.
    Thanks in advance.
    Manisha

    Hi,
    The correct way to deal with this is not with activity groups, but with tolerance profiles. Create tolerance profiles with error and warning messages accordingly and then create a tolerance derivation strategy, which on the basis of commitment item, will derive the relevant profile.
    Regards,
    Eli

Maybe you are looking for