Matching B-channel for dialpeer assigment (Incoming call)

Is it possible to manipulate a specific B Channel to use a dialpeer? For example on a T1 with 24 channels, I need the last 4 B-channels to choose an specific dialpeer, same concepts as matching incoming DID's but on a B-Channel slot.
If a call arrives on B-channel 20, I need that call to be sent to a specific DN at the CallManager.
I am using H.323 on the gateway side.
thanks in advanced.
Oscar

Hi!
I'm stuck in a similar situation at the moment, and hope someone has solved this issue.
I have a "back to back connection" between two PBX'es that communicate using Q.931. I have had to replace my old hardware running a legacy CCS solution due to its incapability of understanding overlap signalling. I have replaced it with two Cisco routers running E1 (Q931). Between the units I have a high latency low bandwidth network.
The issue is that the PBX'es are configured in a way that requires calls between the PBX'es to use the same time slot at both ends. I'm running a VoIP network with CUCM between the two sites.
=============================================
controller E1 0/2/0
framing NO-CRC4
pri-group timeslots 1-21
trunk-group TS01 timeslots 1
trunk-group TS02 timeslots 2
trunk-group TS03 timeslots 3
trunk-group TS04 timeslots 4
trunk-group TS05 timeslots 5
trunk-group TS06 timeslots 6
trunk-group TS07 timeslots 7
trunk-group TS08 timeslots 8
trunk-group TS09 timeslots 9
trunk-group TS10 timeslots 10
trunk-group TS11 timeslots 11
trunk-group TS12 timeslots 12
trunk-group TS13 timeslots 13
trunk-group TS14 timeslots 14
trunk-group TS15 timeslots 15
trunk-group TS17 timeslots 17
trunk-group TS18 timeslots 18
trunk-group TS19 timeslots 19
trunk-group TS20 timeslots 20
trunk-group TS21 timeslots 21
dial-peer voice 81030001 pots
trunkgroup TS01
description ** PBX TS01 **
translation-profile incoming 61031401
translation-profile outgoing 25
destination-pattern 81030001T
progress_ind alert enable 8
progress_ind progress enable 2
incoming called-number .
no digit-strip
dial-peer voice 81030002 pots
trunkgroup TS02
description ** PBX TS02 **
translation-profile incoming 61031402
translation-profile outgoing 25
destination-pattern 81030002T
progress_ind alert enable 8
progress_ind progress enable 2
incoming called-number .
no digit-strip
voice translation-rule 25
rule 1 /^810300../ //
voice translation-rule 61031401
rule 1 // /61031401\1/
voice translation-rule 61031402
rule 1 // /61031402\1/
voice translation-profile 25
translate called 25
voice translation-profile 61031401
translate called 61031401
voice translation-profile 61031402
translate called 61031402
=====================================
The idea is that I do not know (or care) what numbers are used as SOURCE or DESTINATION of the original call. My network should be transparent to the PBX number plan. I need to add a prefix, and it should be based on the timeslot the call comes in on. I route the traffic between the routers using the prefix.
The configuration excerpt above should add 61031401 prefix to all calls entering on TS01, and 61031402 to all calls entering on TS02 etc. Calls from the remote should have corresponding prefixes 81030001 for TS01 and 81030002 for TS02 etc.
The outbound (from voip to pots) routing of the above configuration works.
However I have a challenge with the incoming prefixing.
All calls inbound end up using "dial-peer 81030001 pots".
I believe the reason this dial-peer "takes" all of the calls inbound from pots is due to the line "incoming called-number ."
Removing this makes no inbound pots call work as the "destination-pattern 8103001T" is never matched.
Removing "destination-pattern 8103001T" from the dial-peer is not working as it kills the voip to pots routing of inbound calls from the remote router.
Anyone got a good idea for me?

Similar Messages

  • Does OVI suite alert for the new incoming calls?

    I know it alerts for the new incoming SMS, but not for calls. Am I right?
    But why, the PC suite do it and this is important feature for me.
    Solved!
    Go to Solution.

    Same problem for me!!
    I allways used an E52 with PC-Suite which showed me the incomming call notifications on my laptop.
    Now with a new E6, I have to use OVI and there are no notifications anymore.Which is really annoying in a bussy office environment!
    So please provide us with a solution, because I think you are losing a (unique selling point here).
    Thanks,
    Ron

  • Which model still has menu with profiles for accepting certain incoming calls?

    I have been using Sony Ericsson phones for 10 years - my first was a T15.  If I could find one, I'd buy it today.
    What current models have the menu system with multiple profiles and the ability to specify for each profile which callers and/or groups of callers are accepted?
    Does any model still have the menu function to completely turn off the call list?
    I use a mobile telephone for talking - I don't care about photos, music, internet, etc.
    Thank you for your input.

    Try the W595 or the W995.

  • Unity Express - Incoming calls wont get voice mail

    CUE works fine with telephones on my local network. Incoming and outgoing calls work fine.
    However when I get an incoming call via SIP trunk the call will not get forwarded to unity express after 10 seconds. The line goes dead.
    I searched for another post which suggested the following commands:
    telephony-service
    call-forward pattern .T
    voice service voip
    allow connections from h323 to sip
    I've double checked them and there's still something wrong.
    Here's my current configuration:
    voice service voip
    allow-connections h323 to h323
    allow-connections h323 to sip
    allow-connections sip to h323
    allow-connections sip to sip
    supplementary-service h450.12
    h323
    voice class codec 1
    codec preference 1 g711ulaw
    codec preference 2 g711alaw
    telephony-service
    load 7910 P00403020214
    load 7960-7940 P00305000301
    max-ephones 24
    max-dn 24
    ip source-address 192.168.20.1 port 2000
    auto assign 1 to 24
    system message Comtek
    voicemail 3000
    max-conferences 8 gain -6
    call-forward pattern .T
    moh music-on-hold.au
    time-webedit
    transfer-system full-consult
    transfer-pattern 2...
    transfer-pattern 3...
    directory last-name-first
    directory entry 2 2001 name Phone Two 7912
    directory entry 3 2000 name Phone One 7970
    ephone-dn 1 dual-line
    number 2000 secondary 441833000000
    call-forward busy 3000
    call-forward noan 3000 timeout 10
    no huntstop
    ephone 1
    no multicast-moh
    device-security-mode none
    mac-address 0017.0EF0.3642
    type 7970
    button 1:1
    So pros, any suggestions?
    Thanks

    I made a new dial-peer to handle incoming calls as follows.
    dial-peer voice 1000 voip
    description Incoming SIP
    translation-profile incoming SIPin
    voice-class codec 1
    session protocol sipv2
    incoming called-number .T
    dtmf-relay rtp-nte
    no vad
    The translation-profile puts the call through to my 2000 extension.
    This is my "show call active voice brief" when an external incoming call is ringing through to my 2000 ephone-dn.
    To me this seems to show the dial-peer "1000" matching and using the g711ulaw codec
    Telephony call-legs: 1
    SIP call-legs: 1
    H323 call-legs: 0
    Call agent controlled call-legs: 0
    SCCP call-legs: 0
    Multicast call-legs: 0
    Total call-legs: 2
    1715 : 552 596706500ms.1 +-1 pid:1000 Answer +441833696807 connecting
    dur 00:00:00 tx:0/0 rx:0/0
    IP 87.127.240.98:16188 SRTP: off rtt:0ms pl:0/0ms lost:0/0/0 delay:0/0/0ms g711ulaw TextRelay: off
    media inactive detected:n media contrl rcvd:n/a timestamp:n/a
    long duration call detected:n long duration call duration:n/a timestamp:n/a
    1715 : 553 596706510ms.1 +-1 pid:20001 Originate 2000 connecting
    dur 00:00:00 tx:0/0 rx:0/0
    Tele 50/0/1 (553) [50/0/1.0] tx:0/0/0ms None noise:0 acom:0 i/0:0/0 dBm
    Telephony call-legs: 1
    SIP call-legs: 1
    H323 call-legs: 0
    Call agent controlled call-legs: 0
    SCCP call-legs: 0
    Multicast call-legs: 0
    Total call-legs: 2
    This is the "show call active voice brief" for an external incoming call when the call is established.
    Telephony call-legs: 1
    SIP call-legs: 1
    H323 call-legs: 0
    Call agent controlled call-legs: 0
    SCCP call-legs: 0
    Multicast call-legs: 0
    Total call-legs: 2
    1731 : 569 597220040ms.1 +3730 pid:1000 Answer +441833696807 active
    dur 00:00:02 tx:105/16800 rx:104/16640
    IP 87.127.240.98:15162 SRTP: off rtt:0ms pl:0/0ms lost:0/0/0 delay:0/0/0ms g711ulaw TextRelay: off
    media inactive detected:n media contrl rcvd:n/a timestamp:n/a
    long duration call detected:n long duration call duration:n/a timestamp:n/a
    1731 : 570 597220060ms.1 +3700 pid:20001 Originate 2000 active
    dur 00:00:02 tx:0/0 rx:105/16800
    Tele 50/0/1 (570) [50/0/1.0] tx:16180/16180/0ms g711ulaw noise:0 acom:0 i/0:0/0 dBm
    Telephony call-legs: 1
    SIP call-legs: 1
    H323 call-legs: 0
    Call agent controlled call-legs: 0
    SCCP call-legs: 0
    Multicast call-legs: 0
    Total call-legs: 2
    Not too sure where to go from here.

  • Incoming call volume settings when locked

    Hi, I have the Iphone 5, for some reason incoming calls when the phone is locked are mute or on vibration. When the phone is unlocked it rings normally.
    Can someone please advise how I change the volume settings on the phone when its locked? I keep missing phone calls when its locked.
    Secondly, how do I change my email address?
    Many thanks

    When you unlock the phone and are looking at the home screen, if you press the up or down volume button, what do you see? It should say ringer, then a bar at the bottom showing how far the volume is turned up.
    The ability to change those settings in Do Not Disturb are only available when Do Not Disturb is turned on, and they are only active when Do Not Disturb is on, not when it is off.
    Secondly, make sure the mute switch on the side of the device is not turned on to block the ringing. See this fugure.

  • Z10 hard to hang up incoming call

    why z10's screen too minimalist, so thete is no button for hang up incoming call. it is not easy to scroll down the sreen for answering incoming call. at last my incoming call become miss call. can you fix it?

    My "hang up"button is right there at the bottom. When you scroll down are you putting your finger right on the bar? And... are you sill on 10.0 OS? It's a little pokey.

  • Channel for incoming mail addressed to specific domain

    I am trying to create a channel for all incoming messages addressed to a specific domain.
    I know that all incoming Internet mails go to tcp_local first.
    What I want to do is to separate mails for different domains to different channels so I could later process them, either with conversion channel or with some channel filters.
    Also, after passing trough those specific channels, how to put those mails back on track for delivery?
    Can anyone help on doing this?
    Thanks
    I�m running (on Solaris 8) MS5.2p1 hf1.21

    To look over the docs� but I already did, and it�s pretty bad, poorly explained�
    So, please let�s try to make this clear.
    Note, every time after making changes I run:
    imsimta cnbuild
    imsimta restart
    First, you gave an example to me (reply 5):
    [email protected]%tcp_friendly-daemon
    Second, I was not sure from your post where to put space (reply6), and I tested both cases:
    domain.net$E$F [email protected]%tcp_friendly-daemon # space between $F and $U
    and
    domain.net [email protected]%tcp_friendly-daemon # space between domain.net and $E
    Unfortunately, nothing has changed.
    Third, you wrote (reply 7) �No spaces�.
    Forth, I tested that as well and it gave me an error (reply 8).
    Fifth, in your last reply (reply 9) you said that I need a left and a right half, and you suggested an example that I�ve already checked (reply 6) and it wasn�t working :(
    So, now I am completely lost�
    Here is the result of testing this last example in imta.cnf:
    domain.net [email protected]%tcp_friendly-daemon # space between domain.net and $E
    ! tcp_friendly
    tcp_friendly smtp mx single_sys subdirs 20 noreverse maxjobs 7 pool SMTP_POOL mailfromdnsverify maytlsserver allowswitchchannel saslswitchchannel tcp_auth
    tcp_friendly-daemon
    imsimta cnbuild
    imsimta restart
    imsimta test -rewrite -debug [email protected]
    Could you review this result, please and try to see what is wrong.
    Initializing mm_.
    Initializing mm_ submission.
    Checking identifiers.
    *** Debug output from initializing MM for submission:
    13:43:32.79: mmc_winit('l','postmaster@machine_name.test.com','0IB800802GOK8O@machine_name.test.com') called.
    13:43:32.79: Queue area size 5858064, temp area size 5858064
    13:43:32.79: 1464516 blocks of effective free queue space available; setting disk limit accordingly.
    13:43:32.79: Rewriting: Mbox = "postmaster", host = "machine_name.test.com", domain = "$*", literal = "", tag = ""
    13:43:32.79: Rewrite: "$*", position 0, hash table -
    13:43:32.79: Found: "$E$F$U%$H@machine_name.test.com$V$H"
    13:43:32.79: Rewrite failed, not forward.
    13:43:32.79: Rewrite: "$*", position 1, hash table -
    13:43:32.79: Failed.
    13:43:32.79: Rewrite: "$*", position 0, rewrite database -
    13:43:32.79: Failed
    13:43:32.79: Rewriting: Mbox = "postmaster", host = "machine_name", domain = "machine_name.test.com", literal = "", tag = ""
    13:43:32.79: Rewrite: "machine_name.test.com", position 0, hash table -
    13:43:32.79: Found: "$U%$D@machine_name.test.com"
    13:43:32.79: New mailbox: "postmaster".
    13:43:32.79: New host: "machine_name.test.com".
    13:43:32.79: New route: "machine_name.test.com".
    13:43:32.79: New channel system: "machine_name.test.com".
    13:43:32.79: Looking up host "machine_name.test.com".
    13:43:32.79: - found on channel l
    13:43:32.79: Routelocal flag set; scanning for % and !
    13:43:32.79: Rewriting: Mbox = "postmaster", host = "machine_name.test.com", domain = "$*", literal = "", tag = ""
    13:43:32.79: Rewrite: "$*", position 0, hash table -
    13:43:32.79: Found: "$E$F$U%$H@machine_name.test.com$V$H"
    13:43:32.79: Rewrite failed, not forward.
    13:43:32.79: Rewrite: "$*", position 1, hash table -
    13:43:32.79: Failed.
    13:43:32.79: Rewrite: "$*", position 0, rewrite database -
    13:43:32.79: Failed
    13:43:32.79: Rewriting: Mbox = "postmaster", host = "machine_name", domain = "machine_name.test.com", literal = "", tag = ""
    13:43:32.79: Rewrite: "machine_name.test.com", position 0, hash table -
    13:43:32.79: Found: "$U%$D@machine_name.test.com"
    13:43:32.79: New mailbox: "postmaster".
    13:43:32.79: New host: "machine_name.test.com".
    13:43:32.79: New route: "machine_name.test.com".
    13:43:32.79: New channel system: "machine_name.test.com".
    13:43:32.79: Looking up host "machine_name.test.com".
    13:43:32.79: - found on channel l
    13:43:32.79: Routelocal flag set; scanning for % and !
    13:43:32.79: Mapped return address: postmaster@machine_name.test.com
    *** Debug output from rewriting a forward header address:
    13:43:32.79: Rewriting: Mbox = "user", host = "domain.net", domain = "$*", literal = "", tag = ""
    13:43:32.79: Rewrite: "$*", position 0, hash table -
    13:43:32.79: Found: "$E$F$U%$H@machine_name.test.com$V$H"
    13:43:32.79: Rewrite failed, not envelope.
    13:43:32.79: Rewrite: "$*", position 1, hash table -
    13:43:32.80: Failed.
    13:43:32.80: Rewrite: "$*", position 0, rewrite database -
    13:43:32.80: Failed
    13:43:32.80: Rewriting: Mbox = "user", host = "domain", domain = "domain.net", literal = "", tag = ""
    13:43:32.80: Rewrite: "domain.net", position 0, hash table -
    13:43:32.80: Found: "[email protected]%tcp_friendly-daemon"
    13:43:32.80: Rewrite failed, not envelope.
    13:43:32.80: Rewrite: "domain.net", position 1, hash table -
    13:43:32.80: Failed.
    13:43:32.80: Rewrite: "domain.net", position 0, rewrite database -
    13:43:32.80: Failed
    13:43:32.80: Rewriting: Mbox = "user", host = "domain", domain = ".net", literal = "", tag = ""
    13:43:32.80: Rewrite: "*.net", position 0, hash table -
    13:43:32.80: Failed
    13:43:32.80: Rewrite: ".net", position 0, hash table -
    13:43:32.80: Found: "$U%$H$D@TCP-DAEMON"
    13:43:32.80: New mailbox: "user".
    13:43:32.80: New host: "domain.net".
    13:43:32.80: New route: "TCP-DAEMON".
    13:43:32.80: New channel system: "TCP-DAEMON".
    13:43:32.80: Looking up host "TCP-DAEMON".
    13:43:32.80: - found on channel tcp_local
    13:43:32.80: Rewrite rules result: [email protected]
    13:43:32.80: Checking reverse URL cache for: [email protected]
    13:43:32.80: Applying reverse URL pattern ldap:///$V?mail?sub?$Q to: [email protected]
    13:43:32.85: Resulting URL: ldap:///o%3Ddomain.net%2Co%3Disp?mail?sub?(|([email protected])([email protected]))
    13:43:32.85: mmc_open_url called to open ldap:///o%3Ddomain.net%2Co%3Disp?mail?sub?(|([email protected])([email protected])), flags = 256
    13:43:32.85: URL with quotes stripped: ldap:///o%3Ddomain.net%2Co%3Disp?mail?sub?(|([email protected])([email protected]))
    13:43:32.85: LDAP URL identified
    13:43:32.85: URL context #1 will be used
    13:43:32.85: Performing URL search on: ldap:///o%3Ddomain.net%2Co%3Disp?mail?sub?(|([email protected])([email protected]))
    13:43:32.86: mmc_read_url result: [email protected]
    13:43:32.86: URL resolution returned: [email protected]
    forward channel = l
    channel description =
    channel user filter =
    dest channel filter =
    source channel filter =
    channel flags #0 = BIDIRECTIONAL MULTIPLE IMMNONURGENT NOSERVICEALL
    channel flags #1 = NOSMTP DEFAULT
    channel flags #2 = COPYSENDPOST COPYWARNPOST POSTHEADONLY HEADERINC NOEXPROUTE
    channel flags #3 = LOGGING NOGREY NORESTRICTED RETAINSECURITYMULTIPARTS
    channel flags #4 = EIGHTBIT NOHEADERTRIM NOHEADERREAD RULES
    channel flags #5 =
    channel flags #6 = LOCALUSER REPORTHEADER
    channel flags #7 = NOSWITCHCHANNEL NOREMOTEHOST DATEFOUR DAYOFWEEK
    channel flags #8 = NODEFRAGMENT EXQUOTA REVERSE NOCONVERT_OCTET_STREAM
    channel flags #9 = NOTHURMAN INTERPRETENCODING USEINTERMEDIATE RECEIVEDFROM VALIDATELOCALSYSTEM NOTURN
    defaulthost = test.com test.com
    linelength = 1023
    channel env addr type = SOURCEROUTE
    channel hdr addr type = SOURCEROUTE
    channel official host = machine_name.test.com
    channel queue 0 name = LOCAL_POOL
    channel queue 1 name = LOCAL_POOL
    channel queue 2 name = LOCAL_POOL
    channel queue 3 name = LOCAL_POOL
    channel after params =
    channel user name =
    urgentnotices = 1 2 4 7
    normalnotices = 1 2 4 7
    nonurgentnotices = 1 2 4 7
    channel rightslist ids =
    local behavior flags = %x7
    backward channel = tcp_local
    header To: address = [email protected]
    header From: address = [email protected]
    envelope To: address = [email protected] (route (machine_name.test.com,machine_name.test.com)) (host domain.net)
    envelope From: address = [email protected]
    name =
    mbox = user
    Extracted address action list:
    [email protected]
    Extracted 733 address action list:
    [email protected]
    Address list expansion:
    user%domain.net@ims-ms-daemon
    1 expansion total.
    *** Debug output from submitting an envelope address:
    13:43:32.88: mmc_wadr(0x0018a888,'[email protected]','[email protected]') called.
    13:43:32.88: Copy estimate before address addition is 1
    13:43:32.88: Parsing address [email protected]
    13:43:32.88: Rewriting: Mbox = "user", host = "domain.net", domain = "$*", literal = "", tag = ""
    13:43:32.88: Rewrite: "$*", position 0, hash table -
    13:43:32.88: Found: "$E$F$U%$H@machine_name.test.com$V$H"
    13:43:32.88: Match, pattern = "domain.net", current = "(*domaincheck*)"
    13:43:32.88: old state = not checked.
    13:43:32.88: Using result 1 from domain match cache.
    13:43:32.88: new state = succeeded.
    13:43:32.88: New mailbox: "user".
    13:43:32.88: New host: "domain.net".
    13:43:32.88: New route: "machine_name.test.com".
    13:43:32.88: New channel system: "machine_name.test.com".
    13:43:32.88: Looking up host "machine_name.test.com".
    13:43:32.88: - found on channel l
    13:43:32.88: Routelocal flag set; scanning for % and !
    13:43:32.88: Address [email protected] requires local processing.
    13:43:32.88: Variant #1 = [email protected]
    13:43:32.89: Variant #2 = *@domain.net
    13:43:32.89: Checking for [email protected] in the system alias file
    13:43:32.89: - not found
    13:43:32.89: Checking for *@domain.net in the system alias file
    13:43:32.89: - not found
    13:43:32.89: Checking [email protected] with URL template ldap:///$V?*?sub?$R
    13:43:32.89: LDAP URL template identified
    13:43:32.89: URL determined to be: ldap:///o%3Ddomain.net%2Co%3Disp?*?sub?(|([email protected])([email protected])([email protected]))
    13:43:32.89: URL context #1 will be used
    13:43:32.89: Using cached LDAP result for URL info: ldap:///$V?*?sub?$R|[email protected]|[email protected]
    13:43:32.89: Scanning LDAP result.
    13:43:32.89: Attribute: objectclass
    13:43:32.89: Attribute index: 0
    13:43:32.89: Attribute: inetuserstatus
    13:43:32.89: Attribute index: 1
    13:43:32.89: Attribute: mailuserstatus
    13:43:32.89: Attribute index: 2
    13:43:32.89: Attribute: uid
    13:43:32.89: Attribute index: 4
    13:43:32.89: Attribute: mail
    13:43:32.89: Attribute index: 5
    13:43:32.89: Attribute: mailhost
    13:43:32.89: Attribute index: 9
    13:43:32.89: Attribute: mailDeliveryOption
    13:43:32.89: Attribute index: 18
    13:43:32.89: Attribute: preferredLanguage
    13:43:32.89: Attribute index: 42
    13:43:32.89: Scanning complete, begin actions
    13:43:32.89: Object class: top
    13:43:32.89: Object class didn't match
    13:43:32.89: Object class: person
    13:43:32.89: Object class didn't match
    13:43:32.89: Object class: organizationalPerson
    13:43:32.89: Object class didn't match
    13:43:32.89: Object class: inetOrgPerson
    13:43:32.89: Object class didn't match
    13:43:32.89: Object class: inetUser
    13:43:32.89: Object class didn't match
    13:43:32.89: Object class: ipUser
    13:43:32.89: Object class didn't match
    13:43:32.89: Object class: nsManagedPerson
    13:43:32.89: Object class didn't match
    13:43:32.89: Object class: userPresenceProfile
    13:43:32.89: Object class didn't match
    13:43:32.89: Object class: inetMailUser
    13:43:32.89: Object class match, reference value 1
    13:43:32.89: Object class: inetLocalMailRecipient
    13:43:32.89: Object class match, reference value 18
    13:43:32.89: User/group index = 1
    13:43:32.89: Domain is active
    13:43:32.89: Mail domain is active
    13:43:32.89: User status = active
    13:43:32.89: Mail user status = active
    13:43:32.89: User UID user found.
    13:43:32.89: Processing mailhost attribute machine_name.test.com
    13:43:32.89: Mailhost references local system
    13:43:32.89: Delivery option: mailbox
    13:43:32.89: Delivery options value: 1
    13:43:32.89: No reprocess flag on user, processing now
    13:43:32.89: Status for this address = 1
    13:43:32.89: - URL match for [email protected]
    13:43:32.89: Delivery option template: $M%$\$2I$_+$2S@ims-ms-daemon
    13:43:32.89: - user%domain.net@ims-ms-daemon
    13:43:32.89: Parsing address user%domain.net@ims-ms-daemon
    13:43:32.90: Rewriting: Mbox = "user%domain.net", host = "ims-ms-daemon", domain = "$*", literal = "", tag = ""
    13:43:32.90: Rewrite: "$*", position 0, hash table -
    13:43:32.90: Found: "$E$F$U%$H@machine_name.test.com$V$H"
    13:43:32.90: Match, pattern = "ims-ms-daemon", current = "(*domaincheck*)"
    13:43:32.90: old state = not checked.
    13:43:32.90: Using result 0 from domain match cache.
    13:43:32.90: new state = fail pending.
    13:43:32.90: Rewrite failed due to channel mismatch.
    13:43:32.90: Rewrite: "$*", position 1, hash table -
    13:43:32.90: Failed.
    13:43:32.90: Rewrite: "$*", position 0, rewrite database -
    13:43:32.90: Failed
    13:43:32.90: Rewriting: Mbox = "user%domain.net", host = "ims-ms-daemon", domain = "ims-ms-daemon", literal = "", tag = ""
    13:43:32.90: Rewrite: "ims-ms-daemon", position 0, hash table -
    13:43:32.90: Failed.
    13:43:32.90: Rewrite: "ims-ms-daemon", position 0, rewrite database -
    13:43:32.90: Failed
    13:43:32.90: Looking up host "ims-ms-daemon".
    13:43:32.90: - found on channel ims-ms
    13:43:32.90: - orig_send_access mapping check: l|postmaster@machine_name.test.com|l|[email protected]
    13:43:32.90: - passed.
    13:43:32.90: - send_access mapping check: l|postmaster@machine_name.test.com|ims-ms|user%domain.net@ims-ms-daemon
    13:43:32.90: - passed.
    13:43:32.90: - adding address user%domain.net@ims-ms-daemon to channel ims-ms
    13:43:32.90: - adding address [email protected] to headers.
    13:43:32.90: Copy estimate after address addition is 2
    Expanded address:
    [email protected]
    Submitted address list:
    ims-ms
    user%domain.net@ims-ms-daemon (orig [email protected], inter [email protected], host ims-ms-daemon) NOTIFY-FAILURES NOTIFY-DELAYS
    Submitted notifications list:

  • ISDN E1 PRI incoming calls busy out after 2nd b channel picks up

    I have an ISDN E1 PRI line coming in from the Telco. D Channel comes up nicely and B channels accept calls, but only the first two calls. Once two callers are online, any further incoming calls get a busy tone. ISDN Debug data reports:
    **ERROR**: call_incoming: Remote Protocol Error: No b channel assigned by switch, call id 0xCE
    Hardware I'm using? Cisco 2650, 12.3(7T) and NM-HDV, VWIC-2MFT-E1-DI
    Anybody please help?

    Problem sorted - believe it or not, it was the telco. They changed their switch setting for the line to preferrable B channel - and voila!
    Thanks,
    Brian

  • Caller ID for incoming calls NOT displaying name from contacts (only displays phone # on BB Z10)

    on the Z10 Whenever I receive an incoming call, the caller ID only shows the phone #, even when I have that number matched to a contact in the phone, even the call log it show the number and not the name.  How do I get the caller ID to recognize and display the appropriate contact name with the phone fro an incoming call? Any help would be greatly appreciated!  Thanks, Akhanbilal

    Thank you Arsen but, as with everyone else : (1) When you get an in-coming call, it has no call log on the phone app call log that allows you do a thing under the sun except to touch the number of the last call, and when you do, it CALLS THEM BACK. (2) On every other BlackBerry I have owned, about 10 to-date, I simply selected the last in-coming call and had a button at the bottom of the screen to allow me to ADD TO CONTACTS. (3) This does NOT exist on the Z10, and there certainly is no "Click on number, little slider pops on the right, select add to contact."  Instead it dials them.  Frustrating other uses have described Arsen. Further, while on the topic : (4) None of this has anything to do with 10-digit national dialing plan or anything else on swipe finger down from top in Phone App, Arsen. (5) When you swipe Phone App down, you see SETTINGS. Then, there are 13 items.  I have looked at all 13 items and see nothing as you describe to select, nor any instructions on what to set the SMART DIALING to when there are 3 area codes local for my city and country code shows +1. Further, while on topic here : (6) Visual Voice Mail has been turned-on and whatever visual voice mail is, never supported on any previous BlackBerry including my 9780 before this, I have it with T-Mobile and have it turned on on the BlackBerry Z10 and it too does not work.  On the positive side, I do have a work-around for BlackBerry Z10 to 2013 Toyota entune. (7) I first took a vm msg .wav file of just hello (blank will not send) and saved it on BlackBerry Z10.  The Toyota entune is LOOKING for a music and will LOCK-UP if none are found.  By giving it this, it worked on my 2013 Toyota entune for the 1st time ever.  Yeah !  It is a little frustrating every few minutes listening to myself say HELLO.  But, hey no one really notices it with all the other stuff going on NAVIGATION, radio, cell phone calls, and all the computerized alerts on 2013 Toyota even without entune. (8) What I did now was to go into Navigation and remove SYNC with MUSIC.  I accomplished that after pairing to Z10 to 2013 Toyota, by CANCELLING ALL CONNECTIONS leaving only the pairing itself.  Then, you must choose some connections in the pairing section of SET-UP within Navigation itself.  If you cannot even get to that point, try depressing on the Navigation Screen, INTERNET at which point it will allow you access to SET-UP when you see the message NO ENTUNE APP FOUND ON YOUR BlackBerry Z10.  Red-headed step-child is what we all are.  Have to help each other.  Arsen I appeciate you helping all of us.  Seems the list is about 20 who have voiced it here in this one thread.  We voice it for the 200 million BlackBerry users worldwide, all left out in the cold despite a pretty cool Z10 product. Far better than iPhone 5.  I chose phone and internet.  Internet comes back no BLACKBERRY Z10 TOYOTA ENTUNE APP.  But, at least now I don't have to hear the music HELLO and do not also have the BlackBerry Z10 LOCKED-UP with pop up message you have to say OK to 10 million times to clear and never can actually do a thing on the BlackBerry Z10 as  a result.  Cannot add an in-coming call to Contacts Z10. Cannot see name and number calling me, just the bloody number, no clue who is calling ridiculous. Cannot do diddle-e-squat on BlackBerry Z10 on Toyota entune.  No App.  Horrendous. TAGS : Z10 no caller-id name, Z10 no app Toyota 2013 entune, Z10 add call to Contacts

  • Caller ID for incoming calls NOT displaying name from contacts (only displays phone #)

    Whenever I receive an incoming call, the caller ID only shows the phone #, even when I have that number matched to a contact.  Since I don't have many phone #'s memorized, I have no clue that it is someone I know.  However, the contact name is displayed in my call log, just not on the initial incoming call display.  How do I get the caller ID to recognize and display the appropriate contact name with the phone #? Any help would be greatly appreciated!  (I have the 8520 blackberry)
    Thanks, Lauren 
    Solved!
    Go to Solution.

    Thanks so much!  The problem was the security settings.  I switched the content protection for "contacts included" to "no" and now my contact info shows up on the incoming call display!  Thanks again for your help!

  • Incoming caller toast not matching Outlook or Lync contacts

    From reading similar posts I understand what I want is achievable but for some reason it does not work in my environment and I don't know why.
    The issue is that incoming calls from an external number (lets say a mobile phone) do not match to a person's Outlook contacts, nor do they match with existing Lync contacts, to show a name. Instead they present as a number on the call toast notification.
    My setup:
    Exchange 2010 On Premise
    Lync 2013 On Premise
    Numbers in Active Directory as E.164 format (+44... etc) 
    Numbers in Outlook contacts as a mix of E.164 and 'normal' UK (starting 0...)
    Lync policy is indeed set to search Outlook contacts
    When anyone calls in from Outside we get the number shown and nothing else, it seems it should match with AD if present and with Outlook if present, but it does neither. How do I even start to go about diagnosing this or finding the problem?
    UPDATE: I can now seemingly get it to match AD numbers which is good, but not yet Outlook numbers.

    Hi,
    As Lync show the true caller name match AD number, it may not the Media gateway issue.
    From your description above, the number in Outlook contacts is mix of E.164 format and normal UK number. Did the issue happen only for normal UK number or also happen for E.164 format number?
    Please change the number on Outlook to E.164 and then delete Lync user profile and then test again.
    Best Regards,
    Eason Huang
    Eason Huang
    TechNet Community Support

  • Add prefix 9 for incoming calling number of missed call only.

    Dear,
    I am wondering how to add the prefix 9 to incoming calling number of missed calls only, not the calling alerting number on the phone screen. For example, the local user 472 2001 calls our DID 482 3001 along with the calling number 472 2001 on the dialed phone screen, if I missed this call, in the directory missed call I can see 94722001.
    I know I can add the prefix in the field incoming called party subscriber prefix on the gateway page, but when I do this, all of the calling number information show 9.
    Thanks,
    Kirin

    If I understand you correctly, you would like to only change the missed calls/placed calls on your phones without changing the digits?
    If you have an PRI, you can use this translation rule to change calling ID only on inbound calls:
    Translation pattern to modify Caller ID to add a 9
    voice translation-rule 1
    Rule #  /match/ /set/
    (^.= Match anything begining with any number)(*= one or more digits) tranlasate to (9& = Take whatever is in the match phase and plug it in here)
    rule 1 /^.*/ /9&/ type subscriber subscriber (subscriber = ton(Ton=Type of number) value local area)
    rule 2 /^.*/ /91&/ type national national (national = ton value long distance area)
    rule 3 /^.*/ /9011&/ type international international (international = ton value international area)
    Config t
    voice translation-rule 1
    rule 1 /^.*/ /9&/ type subscriber subscriber
    rule 2 /^.*/ /91&/ type national national
    rule 3 /^.*/ /9011&/ type international international
    voice translation-profile INBOUND_PSTN
    translate calling 1
    voice-port X/X/X
    translation-profile incoming INBOUND_PSTN
    Let me know if this helps.
    John

  • Prefixing a 9 and 91 to incoming calls from SIP provider for callback

    I am wondering what would be the best options  for prefixing a 9 or 91 to incoming calls over a sip connection to allow callback from missed calls and recieved calls. The setup is
    callmanager 7.1.5 >>>>sip trunk>>>>>>>>>>>>CUBE>>>>>>>>>>>sip to ITSP
    I am thinking voice translation rules is the only option for this? any configuration examples for this would be greatly appreciated.
    would this work?
    voice-translation rule 1
    rule 1 // /9/
    voice-translation profile prefix_9
    translate calling 1
    dial-peer voice 101 voip
    destination-pattern ???????...$
    voice-class codec 1
    session protocol sipv2
    session target ipv4: to callmanager
    incoming called-number .
    dtmf-relay rtp-nte
    dial-peer voice 1001 voip
    translation profile incoming prefix_9
    destination-pattern T
    session protocol sipv2
    session target ipv4: to sip provider
    incoming called-number ???????...$
    dtmf-relay rtp-nte

    Your config should work fine, except your profile is only applied to one dial-peer, make sure you apply it to the one that is used to redirect the call to CUCM.
    Also, you did not mention what country you are in, but if this is US you may want to prefix 91 to national calls as carriers don't provide 9 as part of the CLID delivery, also what about your international calls, you may would be more explicit in your first rule to match for national digit string and then have another rule for international.
    HTH,
    Chris

  • Manipulate destination numnber for incoming calls in CCM

    dial-out digit translation can be done with translational patterns in CCM config.
    Similarly how do we translate INCOMING digit strings ?
    For example, suppose we want to change all incoming calls destined to 234XXX to 567XXX.

    Use translation patterns.
    For example if the inbound DID number is 234111 and you would like it to ring extension 567222:
    Configure a translation pattern of
    234111.
    (notice the dot at the end!)
    then configure discard digits to predot which drops the entire string of 234111
    then configure prefix digits of 567222
    So basically 234111 matches the translation pattern and discards all digits but appends 567222 causing the call to ring 567222.
    Same thing can be done for ranges. For example:
    234.XXX would match incoming DID range 234000-234999 and I could prefix it with a 567 causing the translations to ring 567000-567999 (drop the 234 and prefix the 567).
    Please rate all posts!

  • My iphone 4S has problem in making and receiving the calls. While making the call , call fails and netwrok disappears. Like wise no voice is heard for incoming calls. This happened after return from the overseas travel.

    My iphone 4S has problem in making and receiving the calls. While making the call , call fails and netwrok disappears. Like wise no voice is heard for incoming calls. This happened after return from the overseas travel.

    Hello SamSax
    Check out the assist page below for troubleshooting call connectivity.
    Calls and connection issues
    http://www.apple.com/support/iphone/assistant/calls/
    Thanks for using Apple Support Communities.
    Regards,
    -Norm G.

Maybe you are looking for

  • BED value is not captured in the outgoing excise invoice

    Dear Friends, I have  created a sales order consisting of BED,ECESS, SECEE duties in the sales order , delivered and created invoice and then raised excise invoice with the referance to invoice. Here BED is not captured in the excise invoice. I will

  • Modified fileds do not appear under acrobat 7

    Hi, I made a dynamic form (saved in acrobat dynamic 7) link with and xml file. Some fields (1) are linked with an xml file. Some fields (2) have no link and have to be filled by the "sender" of the form. Some fields (3) have no links and have to be f

  • Folio Builder Question

    If I install the Folio Producer tools for CS5 can I still preview folios on my iPad without having purchased the Digital Publishing Suite?

  • Tomcat / MySQL problem

    Simple Tomcat / MySQL code works well on the development server (Windows) but crashes on the production server (Linux). It finds and loads the driver, then fails to create a connection with java.security.AccessControlException: access denied (java.ne

  • Premiere Elements 8

    Today Adobe announced the release of Premiere Elements 8. For those interested in some of the new featuers in this exciting new release, I've created a new FAQ with a linked PDF of some screen shots and detailed discussions. http://forums.adobe.com/t