Max condition value - didn't reset when SO was rejected

Hi All,
I need some help.
Requirement:
Need to set a max discount value for certain material.
Config:
A condition type for discount ZD36 is created:
- Cond.Class : A (Discount or surcharge)
- Calc.Type : A (%)
- Plus/Minus: X (Negative)
- "Group Condition" flag marked
- Manual entries : D (Not possible to process manually)
- "Condition Update" flag marked
- Scale Basis : C (Quantity scale)
- Check value : A (Descending)
Setting:
VK11--> Additional sales data --> Max condition value --> 900- (Valid from today until 31.12.9999)
Testing:
1. Create SO with full discounts (Value : 900-)
2. Reject the first SO by:
- Order reason: Z02 (Cancel Order)
- Reason for rejection: 13 (Cancel Order)
Problem:
When I tried to create another SO, the condition type for discount ZD36 didn't show up.
I think this is a basic thing which should have worked.
Something wrong with my config?
Thank you very much.
Best regards,
Wira Handika.

Hi ta.adithya,
I already find 2 ways to reset the cummulative value:
1. Delete the first SO or
2. Delete the line item in the first SO.
Is there a way to reset the cumulative value simply by reject SO?
Because we want to keep track to all the changes, so we don't want to delete anything.
Thank you.
Best regards,
Wira Handika.
Edited by: Wira Handika on May 25, 2011 11:22 AM

Similar Messages

Max condition value - exceeds while creating a SO

Hi All,
I have a requirement which we are trying to meet up by a solution:-
Requirement:-
A fund value (e.g. 1,00,000) is to be allocated on a particular spend which is offered to customers (e.g. discounts)
So as and when the discounts are offered on the customer orders (SO) the funds value should get depleted
this process goes on and the discounts are offered to the customers, but the total discounts offered till date has reached (98,000), hence when a new order where the discount offered is lets say (5000) it should not allow user to offer it, since it should not go beyond the total fund value i.e. (1,00,000)
Solution:-
Setup:-
A condition type for discount ZCDS is created with "condition update" flag marked
In the condition records of the above condition --> Additional sales data --> Max condition value we will put the total allowed fund of 1,00,000
Transactions:-
Mutliple SO's are created with ZCDS discounts condition types ((1) 30,000 2) 30,000 3) 30,000)
Now in the cumulative values of the ZCDS condition record shows 90,000 for the above 3 orders
Now a new SO is being created with ZCDS valuee of 30,000... IT SHOULD NOT ALLOW TO POPULATE THE ZCDS - CONDITION VALUE OF 30,000 IN THE SO, SINCE IT WILL EXCEED THE TOTAL FUND AMOUNT OF 1,00,000 WHICH IS ALREADY ASSIGNED IN THE "MAX CONDITION VALUE"
ISSUE:-
I am able to create a 4th SO with 30,000 in ZCDS condition type which is updating the "cumulative values" (1,20,000) in the ZCDS condition records as well
QUESTION:-
Can the above scenario met through the solution we have proposed ?
Will the max condition value of 100000 not restrict the condition value in the SO since it is exceeding it ?
Please suggest in case i may have to configure setup additional in it
Appreciate quick replies!
Jimit Shah

Hi
This maximum condition value i have tested some time back
But my results were quiet different
In your example for the 4 th order , when i tested system was taking only 10000 ( the balance of the max condition value)
If we create another order say 5 th order, then for that condition type ZCDS system was taking ZERO value
So it was limiting to the maximum of 100000
But it was allowing us to create N number of orders ( after max condition value was reached )
For those extra orders system was taking zero value for ZCDS ( which i think is meaning less)
When i find time i will test this once again and come back to you
I tested this once again today and found that once the maximum condition value is reached for the rest of orders system was taking the nett value as blank
This is the same with my earlier findings
In your example system will not take it to 120000 if the maximum condition value is set to 100000
If that is happening then there is problem somewhere
and in the condition item details analysis system very clearly tells that MAX value is reached for that condition
MAX condition value is working perfectly
Regards
Raja
Edited by: ramanathan raja on Feb 11, 2011 3:56 PM
Edited by: ramanathan raja on Feb 11, 2011 4:04 PM

Condition Values not being copied when creating sales order with reference

hi experts
i am copy a sales order with reference in va01 , when i copy the order it status is shown as incomplete beacue the condition values in some condition type sis zero, whereas if i delete amount for some condition type and re-eneter it the condition values for all conditon types appears ...
in all after copying order i go to condition at item level some codition values are zero but if erase amount for any condition type and then re enter it value comes for all condition types

Hi Sunny,
Maintain some value against that condition type in VK11.
This must solve your question. Please set to resolved if it solves your doubt.
Regards
Abhii....

The "apply" button didn't display when I was using the "write back" option

I followed the "System Administrator's Guide" to configure the write back function, unfortunately,
the "apply" button didn't display. Is there anyone can give some advice? Thanks!

Just to check, did yiou restart the presentation services after placing the xml file?
Is the template name in answers "SetKPIValue" consistent with the .xml file as you mentioned?
Now, if you could try by putting a hard coded value in the update statement as well.
Also, is the location where the .xml file is kept is,
ORACLE_INSTANCE/bifoundation/OracleBIPresentationServicesComponent/coreapplication_obipsn/analyticsRes/customMessages
P.S. Numeric columns must contain numbers only. They should not contain any data formatting characters such as dollar signs ($), pound signs or hash signs (#), percent signs (%), and so on. [Oracle Admin Guide]
Edited by: 855532 on Jul 13, 2011 1:52 AM

Content didn't move when trial was upgraded

I upgraded from the trial version before it expired. Now my trial has expired, but none of my content is in the new room. Anyone know how to fix this?

Sounds like you were given a new account, as opposed to transitioning your trial to a paid account. I would double check with who ever you worked with to make the conversion to ensure that everything was done as expected.

Max cond value vs max cond base value

Hi All,
What is the difference between
Maximum condition value & Max condition base value, in the condition records. (VK11,12,13)
Path - Maximum condition value:-
VK13 --> condition records --> add sales data --> max cond value
For Path Maximum condition base value, i cant see the field out there on the screen
PL help with the differences between the functionality, appreciate, if it is with an example
Jimit Shah

Hi Jimit,
I think it should be ' Condition Base value " and "Max condition value " I may be wrong.
Conditional base value When a value is derived for a condition type, based on certain calculation this value is taken as base.
Condition base value is a concept used in pricing procedure and actual term used is alternate condition base value. This is a formula assigned to a condition type in order to promote an alternate base value for the calculation of the value. If you have to calculate price of a material then you have to have a base value for it. For e.g. if you want to calculate the discount of 10 % for a material then you have to have a base value on which this 10% is calculated. Normally you take the condition value of the base price of the material to calculate the value.
Max condition value, Provided that the condition update function is active for a particular condition type, you can create condition records that specify a maximum cumulative value. The system uses the condition value of an item as the basis for the cumulative value.
You can specify the maximum value when you maintain an existing condition record. The condition update indicator must be maintained in Customizing for Sales for the corresponding condition types.
For example, specify that a customer receives a 10 USD discount for a particular material up to a maximum cumulative order quantity of 5,000 cases. As the customer places sales orders for the item, the system keeps track of the cumulative value (in this example, the number of cases) and stores this data at the condition record level. Once the cumulative value reaches 5,000 cases, the system automatically deactivates the discount. ( Source help.sap.com )
To view the cumulative value for a particular condition record:
Within the condition record, choose Extras > Cumulative values.
A dialog box displays the cumulative value of sales orders where this condition record was used.
Thanks/Rajesh
Edited by: Rajesh Kumar Bhansali on Mar 2, 2011 5:40 PM
Edited by: Rajesh Kumar Bhansali on Mar 2, 2011 5:41 PM

Condition Values different fro Billing and Excise Invoice in some cases

Hi All,
Excise Invoice for domestic sales is having different condition values.
I am scenerio like this when Billing doc manually VF01, excise Invoice in generated automatically and condition values
were corrrect.But when I create Billing Document using BAPI in program, Excise Invoice is not generating,then
we are running BDC for T-code J1IIN and creating Excise Invoice.Excise Invoice generated in second case (by BDC)
is having wrong condition values.
Can anyone explain why it is happing.Is there any user exist to copy Billing Doc condition values to Excise Invoice?
Thanks in Advance ,
Rayudu

Thanks for you response Lakshimipathy.
The above mentioned configurations were all ready done.Excise Invoice is getting generated when we create Billing Doc online.
Problem here is Excise invoice is not getting generated automatically when Billing Doc is created by our program,so we were running BDC code to created excise Invoice.
Condition values ( Duties :AED,Ecess,SHEcess) were getting calculated wrongly in excise Invoice which is created by running BDC code in program. But the Excise invoice which was created automatically while saving Billing doc manually is having correct condition values. But the billing document condition values remain the same & correct for both.
Regards,
Rayudu

Condition value not updated when qty changed

hi all,
I have created a new condition ZPR1 (copied from PR00) and use a new formula for it.
There is a problem when I change the qty after the item is billed.
Suppose the original qty is 1 and total ZPR1 price is 100. When I change the qty to 2, the ZPR1 price is still 100! It will change to 200 if the item is not billed.
Anybody encounters such problem and how to solve?
Thanks

Hi,
I don't mean to change the unit price.
I mean the condition value (the item total price) is not updated
You can't change the price anymore in the condition tab after you billed
But when you change the qty of the item, the total value should change accordingly
And I think for my case I should not cancel the invoice. Suppose original qty is 10, and there is partial shipment of 7 and billed the customer. Later customer request to reduce the qty to 7 to complete the item. We should not cancel the invoice in this case.
Try to test with PR00 and PN00, you will see the item value will be changed according to the item qty.

ITunes accepted my de-authorize request but didn't reset. Now when I check it it says I have to wait till June 26th? There has to b a way to reset this! I can't wait to access my Cloud svcs etc for 2 months!

iTunes accepted my de-authorize request but didn't reset. Now when I check it it says I have to wait till June 26th? There has to b a way to reset this! I can't wait to access my Cloud svcs etc for 2 months!

That means you had already done de-authorization once last Jun26. Please take note that you are only allowed to deauthorize all only once a year. Refer to this article:
iTunes Store: About authorization and deauthorization
http://support.apple.com/kb/HT1420
However, you may contact Apple Customer service for exception to the rule. Scroll down to bottom of this page and click Contact Us link. Go to Phone section for Phone number of your country and call them.

Condition value getting changed when open the Sales order in VA02

Hi Experts,
i have creating Sales order manually in VA01, and for first line item of sale order, i have assigned value in custom field of additional tab B, to populate Condition value for condition type ZK01 and checked in VA02, VA03 same Condition value is there for condition type ZK01.
And created delivery document and billing document for newly created Salesorder.
When i have open the Sales order in VA02, then i am getting changed Condition value for conidition type ZK01 in bothe header and first line item and in VA03 there is no change in value.
Kindly let me know the user exit or any related programs to this issue.Thanks in Advance.

Hi Rajani,
this sound like VOFM -> conditions. Do you know which conditions are active during the determination?
Cheers,
Stefan.

Referencing condition values when creating return order is wrong...

Hello Experts,
Lets say I have a billing document that has 3 line items namely material A, B and C.
Now, I created a return order for material A with 2 separate line items because of different
storage locations. Now, is there a user-exit that lets my 2nd line item copy the condition values of the
1st line item of the reference billing document? because they are of the same material(A).
Currently, we are having problems when creating a return order having multiple line items of the same material
because the succeeding line items copies the wrong condition values of the referenced billing doc.
For example:
Original billing document:
Material      Discount
A          100
B          200
C          300
Return Order:
Material     Discount
A          100
A          200
A          300
The succeeding line items of my return order must point to the first line item since they are of the
same material. Hope you can help me guys. Thank you and take care!

You may need to explore in the copy control definition, especially the pricing type defined. Check if any customized requirements exists for condition which checks w.r.t to the document number instead of reference document number item.

Incorrect Condition Values when billing multiple deliveries

Hi all.
Ok this is a new one on me, when i bill using VF01 and enter multiple deliveries in (2) then second billing document (2 are created) that is created has some condition values that differ from the first, i must add it the same material, condition values, qty and ship to on the deliveries, also the deliveries are NOT reference to a sales order.
But when you create each delivery as a single billing document all is ok.
Any initial ideas?
Just better add this is a density calulation as we use the F&A pricing for these billing docs.
Regards
Steve
Edited by: Steve Cane on Mar 31, 2009 10:16 AM

Hello steve,
some possibilities
some of the conditions may be group conditions and hence the base is the cumulative of both the conditions
copy control from delivery to invoice may be to redtermine the scales and hence it may be updating when together
hope this helps
Thanks
akasha

Condition value of Tax condition type gets added to Total Value in Contract

Hi All,
I'm currently investigating an issue where there are 2 line items in an SAP Sales Contract. There is a human error in the second line where the billing end date is less than billing start date in the billing plan. Consequently, the second line has null Outgoing target value.
However, the header Total value in the Contract gets wrongly calculated as Basic condition value of 1st line + Condition value of tax condition type of line one due to this.   When I modify the billing end date for the second line item to be a date greater than the billing start date, the above problem disappears and the total value of the contract does not include the tax component.
For eg.
Normal Error free Contract
Total Value at Header =   700.00 EUR
                   Material          Outgoing Target val
Item 0010    MAT1               450.00                          ( 450 + 50 (tax ) )
Item 0020    MAT2               150.00
Contract with billing plan error in second line
Total value at Header =   550.00 EUR
                        MAterial       Outgoing target val
Item 0010         MAT1             450.00                    ( 450 + 50 (tax ) )
Item 0020         MAT2              0.00
Any inputs would be most welcome.
Regards,
Venkatesh.
Edited by: Venkatesh Gopalarathnam on Jan 24, 2012 9:48 AM

No, i didn't.
Actually, i enter condition type and amount in sales order manually.
At that time my program which i modified at 'Define And Assign Pricing Procedures' in IMG should be run.
But the result of running is different from my purpose.
To change Condition value of condition type in sales order, are there any solution?

Cumulative quantity has exceeded still billing have condition value.

Hi,
Requirement – One discount condition which will be applicable up to a certain quantity at billing.
Issue – Condition is getting determined at billing while cumulative quantity has exceeded.( I am using pricing type C in copy control delivery to billing).
Note –     1. I am using partial Delivery method.
               2. When creating new order functionality is working fine.
Existing Scenario-
i. I have created one condition with condition update setting.
ii. I have maintained VK11 with amount 90 Rs. and Max.cond.base value 1000 qty in additional data.
iii. I have created one sales order (ord. qty. 1500).
iv. Created 1st delivery and billing for 1000 qty.
v. When creating 2nd billing(qty 200) with same delivery, system is picking discount condition which should not happen as billing quantity has exceeded.
Please advise
Thanks and Regards,
Vinod

Hi Vinod,
Which routine have you created..did u create a routine for 'alt calc type' or 'alt cond base value' in pricing ?
If after using A or D in pricing type in copy control, the condition values are not copied from the sales order, then that means there is some issue with the copying control settings.
Anyways, now you have met your requirement.
Please close this discussion.
Regards
Jobi

Condition value from previous PO changes total value of new PO

Dear gentlemen,
We have a surcharge condition, calculation type = B (Fixed amount), category = Delivery costs. When viewing header condition details in PO, there appears an unknown "condition base value" with no "rate unit" associated with it. This value is carried over to the next PO created, changing its total value, thus affecting inventory value. What is wrong with this condition? How can I not let the system carry over "condition value" from previous POs?
Regards,
Carlos Piana
La Universal
Guayaquil, Ecuador, South America

My aim is the difference between 56062 on 10.07.2012 00:00:00 and 52013 on 13.04.2012 and so on.
The final table should look like this:
DateId
Severity
PageCount
DeviceId
ErrorId DIFF
13.04.2012 00:00:00
1
52013
163
1              52013
10.07.2012 00:00:00
1
56062
163
1               4049
13.11.2012 00:00:00
4
63907
163
1                 ...
28.11.2012 00:00:00
4
64492
163
1
12.09.2012 00:00:00
4
61524
163
1
29.11.2012 00:00:00
4
64573
163
1
Why I am doing this is that I want to calculate an Printerindex. This is the Amount of Errors related to the volume of pages, printed.
The Formula in DAX is Measure:=(COUNT(FactErrors[ErrorId]))/(SUM(FactErrors[PagesCount])/10000)
So I get this PivotTable:
Zeilenbeschriftungen
CountDevices
SUM PageCount
CountErrors
PrinterIndex
MFP
523
90135296
1362
31,24906792
HP
125
30805190
241
5,529387202
Lexmark
369
53500358
856
27,39392853
Samsung
29
5829748
265
41,33069233
Samsung CLX-92x1 93x1 Series
22
5400624
246
38,36735967
Samsung SCX-8123 8128 Series
7
429124
19
4,482612183
You see, that if I can't SUM already summarized printed volume. Another way could be to aggregate the volume as MAX() but this is not working, either.
Zeilenbeschriftungen
CountDevices
MAX PageCount
CountErrors
PrinterIndex
MFP
523
435853
1362
0,151106177
HP
125
435853
241
0,07823357
Lexmark
369
312478
856
0,159998929
Samsung
29
64117
265
0,454565103
Samsung CLX-92x1 93x1 Series
22
64117
246
0,45550292
Samsung SCX-8123 8128 Series
7
42386
19
0,442762465
I hope you see my problem ...

Max condition value - didn't reset when SO was rejected

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for