MB5B report values not consistent

Hi,
Everytime when run MB5B report for same set of input and periods we are getting different values for opening and end /closing value.
when we execute the same report we are getting different values for opening and closing/end values this difference occuring everytime ,even for closed period also.
what could be the reason.?

Hi,
In MB5B report selection screen input is -
take example of say period from 01.04.2008 to 30.06.2008
then in plant selection from 1100 to 1150
on executing it first time it gives end values as 313,465,966.27 and opening value as 301,091,451.65
after sometime when i run this report again with same set of inputs as above then values for closing 313,450,402.27 and opening value as 301,075,887.65
On analysis we found that every time the difference between opeing and closing is same
What could be the reason

Similar Messages

Stock in warehouse report - value not displayed.

In the "Stock in warehouse report" I selected this option: Price source = Last purchase price.
In the report, for an item, the value in the field "Item Price" is not displayed.
This item has a good receipt (with value) in this year.
Why the value is not displayed?
Thanks
Paolo

Paolo...
1. Did that receipt get paid for with an AP Invoice (when last purchase price is updated)?
and
2. Did you run an Inventory Audit Report before running the Inventory in Warehouse Report?
To see this maybe you can go into SAP OEC DEMO and create a new item, then create a PO - run the two reports, copy to Goods Receipt PO - run the two reports, and then copy to AP Invoice - run the two reports. You will see the difference.
Accounting point - an item is not really valued until the AP Invoice is processed. Only then do you know what the actual purchase cost is for a product.
Regards - Zal

Copa report values not coming in report

hi Gurus
In copa Values are not coming in report.
where is the problem
can anybody suggest
bye
Ramesh Reddy

Hi Ramesh,
First u check with whether the COPA is integrated with other modules or not? that means with fi/mm and co and SD...

Service Level Report values not matching to Service Level Dashboard v 2.0 values

Hi Experts,
We have installed SLD v2 on a development SQL server along with WSS 3.0. The SLD is pointed to the SCOM datawarehouseDB to collect the information to have it up in the dials.
We have SCOM 2007 R2 who's OpsMgrDB and OpsMgrDWDB are hosted on a SQL 2008 R2 instance.
I have created the Distributed application and added 3 Service level Tracking to it.
Availibility
Processor Utilization
Memory Utilization
The problem here i am facing is that the values in the dials on the SLD Home sites do not match with the values i get when i run the report for Service Level Tracking Summary under reporting tab in Ops
Console.
What could be probable reason for this ?
Regards,
Prajul

Hello,
Here are some articles related to this issue. Hope they are helpful.
Running a Service Level Tracking Report
http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/hh212726.aspx
Generating a Service Level Tracking Report
http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/dd441422.aspx
The Service Level Tracking Summary Report in System Center Operations Manager 2007 may be empty if TODAY is not selected for the TO date
http://support.microsoft.com/kb/2567404/en-us
Best regards,
Sophia Sun
Please remember to click “Mark as Answer” on the post that helps you, and to click “Unmark as Answer” if a marked post does not actually answer your question. This can be beneficial to other community members reading the thread.

Console cluster reporting is not consistant with dynamic list

          (We are using the 6.1 sp2 plug-in for Linux. Our web server - apache - is on Solaris
          and our WL servers are on Linux Ret hat. 7.2 2.4.9-31smp)
          Recently our production site experienced the following unfortunate scenario:
          Here are the specifically the events that took place:
          On Sept 6 @ 2:30 pm:
               I observered that the Admin console was reporting that only 3 (servers #3, #5
          and #6) out of the 6 servers were participating in the cluster. On the other
          hand, From the access logs, I was still seeing activity on all 6 servers.
               At the same time, our operations team did not report any T3 PING failures (Tivoli
          automates the sending of T3 PING two each of the 6 servers in the cluster every
          10 minutes) which indicated that none of the server where in a hung state. This
          further verified that the all 6 servers were healthy.
               Question: Why was the plugin still distributing traffic to all 6 servers despite
          the fact (as reported by the admin server) that 3 of the 6 servers were no longer
          participating in the cluster? Shouldn't the dynamic list have excluded these
          3?
          On Sept 6 @ 11:30 pm: The operation team reported that all 6 servers where no
          longer responding to a ping (hung state). I then checked the admin console and
          it was reporting that none of the servers were participating in the cluster.
          Is there a bug with the 6.1 sp2 console?


Nael,
          This is a known problem. Please contact support and reference CR075667 to obtain the
          appropriate fix.
          Regards,
          Simon
          Developer Relations Engineer
          BEA Support
          Nael Ramadan wrote:
          > (We are using the 6.1 sp2 plug-in for Linux. Our web server - apache - is on Solaris
          > and our WL servers are on Linux Ret hat. 7.2 2.4.9-31smp)
          > Recently our production site experienced the following unfortunate scenario:
          >
          > Here are the specifically the events that took place:
          >
          > On Sept 6 @ 2:30 pm:
          >
          > I observered that the Admin console was reporting that only 3 (servers #3, #5
          > and #6) out of the 6 servers were participating in the cluster. On the other
          > hand, From the access logs, I was still seeing activity on all 6 servers.
          > At the same time, our operations team did not report any T3 PING failures (Tivoli
          > automates the sending of T3 PING two each of the 6 servers in the cluster every
          > 10 minutes) which indicated that none of the server where in a hung state. This
          > further verified that the all 6 servers were healthy.
          > Question: Why was the plugin still distributing traffic to all 6 servers despite
          > the fact (as reported by the admin server) that 3 of the 6 servers were no longer
          > participating in the cluster? Shouldn't the dynamic list have excluded these
          > 3?
          >
          > On Sept 6 @ 11:30 pm: The operation team reported that all 6 servers where no
          > longer responding to a ping (hung state). I then checked the admin console and
          > it was reporting that none of the servers were participating in the cluster.
          >
          > Is there a bug with the 6.1 sp2 console?

Difference in MARDH & MB5B report

Hi,
I'm comparing the previous period stock using MARDH table with MB5B stock report but closing balance what we get from MB5B report is not matching with the MARDH Table.

Hi,
MB5B: Gives Opening and Closing stocks for a given date range.
MB5B calculates the stock at a certain date by reading all movements (adding receipts and reducing goods issues)
MARDH store Stocks for Periods (Months).
MARDH has the historic stock at month end. A MARDH record for the last period is only created if a new movement in the current period has changed the stock level.
Example. If you had 100 stock in April and you had a goods issue of 20 in May, then you will get a MARDH record for period 01 with stock of 100.
If the stock situation has not changed until today (period 10-January) then you see the stock of 80 in table MARD, and the last MARDH record is the record of period 01 with stock of 100.

Update button in sql report for each row can only get the report value

I have to added Update for each row of records like:
select a.*,'Update' button from (
select c.*,d.login from country c,champ d
where c.champ_id=d.champ_id(+)
order by c.name) a
then go to the report->edit button ->Column Link
I added some items P40_REGION, P40_CHAMPID,P40_ACTIVE,P40_CODE and assign the value like #region#,#active# ,#code# to these item, but when I click the update button in the report I found the values such as #region#,#active# ,#code# is the report value not the select list selected value(the region, active column are displayed as select list lov).
Can anyone tell me how to sort this knid of problem?
Thanks a lot!

Sorry, it doesn't work. I also tried apex_application.g_f01(i), but not everytime I can get the value or get the incorrect value. If you have time you can try to create it like what I have described. Our team use two days now but still can not sort this problem.

MB5B Report for Date Wise Stock and Value

Hi,
I am Taking MB5B Report for Date Wise Stock and Value.
But I have one doubt all stocks is coming or not in these report like Unrestrected Stock,Return Stock.Blocked stock,Transist stock,Restrected Stock,qty Inspection Stock.
I have another Doubt in these report three Stock type indicaters are there like these.
1.Storage Location / Batch Stock
2.valuated Stock
3.Special Stock.
But i have one doubt what is defferent these
1.Storage Location / Batch Stock
2.valuated Stock

Hi Prasad,
Yes MB5B report consider the Unrestricted, Quality, Blocked, Transit stock and restricted stock. Not sure about Return Stock.
If you select the Storage location/Batch stock radio button then the system will display all the possible stock from the storage location and the corresponding batch also.
If you select Valuated stock radio button then system will show only the valuated stock not the Non-valuated stock. Because Non-valuated material type is available in SAP system will not show those stock suppose if you select the Valuated stock radio button.
Regards
Karthick

In MB5B report having minus value

Dear exports
In MB5B report the opening (amount in LC) stock value in the minus value for zero quantity for some material.
why it is?
how can i balanced?
Regards
amsi

check if anwer to question 5 can help you :
OSS Note 690027 - FAQ: Reporting IM (no LIS)

Plan values not being displayed in the report ..

Hi All,
I have a query on query.. .
which displays actual and plan values , but the report is not showing the plan values
tell me how to do this
Sruthi

Sruthi,
Basically how do you store the data in the transaction cube's ?
How does the data differs b/w Plan and actual for the same KF ?
It stores depending on the Version...
Restrict the KF to a perticular version ...
Then you can get the desired...
Check the LISTCUBE with different versions..
Cheer's
HVR.

Custom Report Not fetching values for parameter of report (Valueset not pop

Hi,
I am running custom report on Oracle application R12. This report parameters used standard value set for fetching purchase order number. The value set is not populating any values for the custom report. but for the standard report where this valuse set populating proper result.
It's bit Supprising ...the same valuset populating values for standard reports but not for custom report developed by me.
Value set query using table valueset and getting values from po_headers (View)
Thanks

Hi All,
Luckily I have been able to rectify the problem !
I tried retrieving the output using LISTCUBE to show the SID of the InfoObject also for which I was unable to get the data. After the report successfully gave the output for those I/O, I checked again I could see the data in the I/O maintain master data !
It worked like magic to me !
But I could guess that since it is a virtual I/O therefore it is not able to retrieve the data from the table directly and is able to do that only after the SID of this I/O is retrieved.
(If a characteristic does not have any master data, the values from the SID table are displayed for the "Values in Master Data Table" mode.)
Closing the thread !
Regards
Shalabh

Refresh PL/SQL Report Region (not Page) using Select List value

Hi,
I've got a report region based on a 'PL/SQL function body returning a SQL query'which gets generated on selecting a value from a Select list item, The Select List action is 'Redirect and Set value' but this causes the whole page to refresh rather than just the report region. I've tried to refresh the report only using a dynamic action on the Select List item (Action now reset to 'None') but now the report is not appearing on choosing from the List. Can anyone suggest a solution that will allow me to refresh this report without refreshing the page? I am using APEX 4.2.2 and the report syntax is as follows:
DECLARE
v_statement VARCHAR2(500);
BEGIN
SELECT query_text
    INTO v_statement
   FROM sql_queries
   WHERE query_id = :P2_QUERY ;
   RETURN v_statement ;
END ;
where P2_QUERY is Select List Item,
regards,
Kevin.

KevinFitz wrote:
The report region being displayed is conditional on P2_QUERY item being NOT NULL. I assume the region not appearing is because the Action for the Select List Item is set to None and so P2_QUERY is always NULL.
No, the region is not appearing because it is conditional on P2_QUERY being NOT NULL. This means that the report region never exists on the page shown in the browser, so it can't be dynamically refreshed. (Dynamic refresh doesn't evaluate region conditions, and it only re-renders the report content, not the entire region.)
Remove the condition on the report region, check the refresh is working, then reconsider exactly what the requirements here are. If you want the region to appear only when P2_QUERY has a value, and you want it to be refreshed without submitting and re-rendering the page, then the region needs to be hidden rather than conditionally rendered, and shown via a dynamic action when P2_QUERY gets a value.
I tried adding an additional Set Value True Action for the DA event but got an error as listed above,
All irrelevant if Page Items to Submit on the region is used properly.

Report query not returning the field value from external table

hi
I have an issue regarding reports. I have a query having 4 fields from external table and remaining from db tables. the report query returns all the fields from the db tables and only 2 fields from external table. but the same query if I tried in plsql developer it returns all the fields values.
Can anyone please help me in this issue.
Thanks and Regards
kk

Duplicate post?
value not displaying in report whereas it returns in plsql developer
value not displaying in report whereas it returns in plsql developer
Please log a SR if you do not get any reply to your thread instead of creating new one.
Thanks,
Hussein

FI vs MM report - Stock Values not matching

Dear Experts,
MM Report : We are taking stock value report from MC.9 or MB5L for few sites for the previous financial year.
FI Report : The same sites and same previous year with material G/L account, the t-codes FAGLB03 or S_PL0_86000030 are showing the different values.
The question here is,MM and FI reports are not matching. (FI reports shows Rs.47750 higher than the MM reports). As per the client requirement, the MM & FI reports should match the values. Because all the material movement types are related to FI (For. ex GR & IR )
Kindly tell me, what are the possibilities to go wrong?
How & where to analysis?
Expecting a perfect report which gives the MM & FI values?
Additional details: There is no possibility of manual posting in G/L account. It is automatic posting (Checked in the Tcode - FS00)
I really appreciate if any one help me
Thanks & Regards,
n a v a h s e k

Hello,
I thought, You can post manually to your stock account.
First you can look the account change history for your stock account. Automatic posting check may be change by someone at past, and after manually posting, check it again.
Z programs which is posting FI document with BAPI, system can not look automatic posting checkbox in FS00. May be Z programs posting to your stock without MM module.
How can you catch this document?
Answer is, please add BKPF-AWTYP field to your FBL3N report.
Call SPRO -> Financial Accounting (New) -> Accounts Receivable and Accounts Payable -> Customer Accounts -> Line Items -> Display Line Items -> Define Additional Fields for Line Item Display
Please add new entry with using BKPF-AWTYP then save this customizing and please run RFPOSXEXTEND report with using SE38 transaction. While running this program, a pop-up appear on your screen, please click "YES" after that program will finish correctly. Then you can see "Reference Transact." field in FBL3N report.
Then list your stock account with using this report and get subtotal for "Reference Transact.". If this field value is MKPF, these postings is coming from MM module. If there is a BKPF or BKPFF value, those are posting manually from FI module.
I hope it helps to you,
Regards,
Burak

KE5Z drilldown report does not equal grr3 report values

Hello,
We have a grr3 report where the COGS line is based on functional area and account ranges. The total displayed on the GRR3 report for the COGS cell matches the values I would expect based on the specified account and functional area restrictions assigned to that cell. When I drill into the KE5Z report (Profit Center: Actual Line Items), which is identified as a receiver report, the summed value of the "In Company Code Currency" field does not equal what is displayed in GRR3. The GRR3 report is returning results in the same currency as the company code currency that the report is being executed for so that is not the problem. During my investigation it looks like the functional area restrictions are not being accounted for when I drill into KE5Z. Any recommendations on why the restrictions identified for the cell in the GRR3 report would not be carried through to the KE5Z results? I have been playing with this for hours and have run out of ideas. I can't determine why the COGS cell value is different than the actual line items sum. Any help would be greatly appreciated.
Thanks,
Jordan

Hi Jordan,
in my experience the report-report interface can only pass through selections independently.
To give an example: I had a report painter report with line 1 that had a selection on two characteristics (say cost element A and cost center B) then a second line with selection cost element C and cost center D selected and finally a line with the sum of the two lines above.
Now when I jump to a connected line item report by double-clicking on the line with the sum, the parameters passed on are:
cost centers: B, D
cost element: A, C
Therefore, the sum of my line items is not equal to the sum that I departed from, as I get line items with cost element A and cost center D, for example, a combination that was excluded from my original report.
I hope I made the point clear.
Another possibility is of course, that the receiving report has additional selection active (in the form used in the dril down report) that were not present in the original report
Regards
Nikolas
Edited by: Nikolas John on Mar 24, 2011 9:21 AM

MB5B report values not consistent

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for