Measuring 3d profile of wrinkles

I have an experiment where I generate wrinkles on the sureface of thin elastomer sheets. I am currently researching methods by which I can measure the 3d profile of the wrinkles. Does LabView have the capability of doing this? What do I need to get started?
Many thanks in advance for any help.
Best regards.

Hi,
What are you asking when you say does LabVIEW have the capability to measure the wrinkles? How are you intending to actually measure the dimensions of the wrinkles, using a probe, using a camera, what type of data input?. LabVIEW has the capability to take input data from many types of sensors and then perform just about any math that is needed to interpert this data. If you can be a little more specific in what you are attempting to do we may be able to be a little more specific in helping suggest ways to do it.
P.M.
Putnam
Certified LabVIEW Developer
Senior Test Engineer
Currently using LV 6.1-LabVIEW 2012, RT8.5
LabVIEW Champion

Similar Messages

ICC profiles needed

Hi, I give up. I want to follow this procedure as found on the HP website:
HP Printers - Using ICC Profiles for Color Photos in Adobe Photoshop. However, after two days of searching I have been unable to locate the HP ICC profiles for my printer, paper and ink type, all HP products. They are not currently listed in the drop down profiles of step 3 in the above article. Some older deskjet models are all that are there. I am looking for the ICC profiles for:
Printer: HP Photosmart C6380
Paper: HP Premium Plus Photo Paper Soft Glossy Q5450A
Ink: HP Vivera Inks.
Does anyone have a link to where they are located? Thank you!!
This question was solved.
View Solution.

Creating Custom ICC Profiles for Color Photos
   1.
      Select File , then Print with Preview . (Photoshop 6 and prior: select File , then Print .)
   2.
      Select the Show More Options check box, and Color Management from the drop-down menu.
   3.
      In the Profile menu, select Same as Source .
The printer driver must also be configured to properly use custom profiles. Use the steps below to configure the printer driver.
   1.
      Select File , Print , and then Properties , Color .
   2.
      Select Managed by application from the Color management menu.
   3.
      Click on the Paper/Quality tab and select the appropriate paper type from the Type is menu.
   4. Click OK , and then OK again to print.
    NOTE:     The paper type must be selected in the printer software even when creating a profile. Maximum ink volume limits are determined by the paper-type selection, not through the ICC profile.
With these settings, a print without any color management intervention from either the printer driver or the application will be produced. This print is suitable for measurement and profile creation
                    OR
Using ICC Profiles for Color Photos in Adobe Photoshop
   1.
      Select File , then Print with Preview . (For Photoshop 6 and prior select File , and then Print ).
   2.
      For Photoshop 7 and CS, in the Print with Preview dialog, select the Show More Options checkbox, and Color Management from the menu.
   3.
      In the Profile menu, select the profile that corresponds to the printer, paper type, and ink set.
   4.
      Set the ICC rendering intent in the Intent menu. Most users will want to use the Perceptual intent to give the most subjectively pleasing color reproduction.
   5.
      Checking the Use Black Point Compensation box is also recommended.
The printer driver must also be configured to properly use the profile. Use the steps below to configure the printer driver.
   1.
      Select File , Print , and then Properties , Color .
   2.
      Select Managed by application from the Color management menu.
   3.
      Click on the Paper/Quality tab and select the appropriate paper type from the Type is menu.
   4. Click OK , and then OK again to print.
    NOTE:     If you select an ICC profile for your printer under Print with Preview in Adobe Photoshop that selection will be retained, even when later using the Photoshop Print or Print one Copy functions instead of Print with Preview . If you want to return to using the default sRGB mode after using ICC profiles, you must go back into the Print with Preview menu and select either sRGB or Same as Source as your printer profile. If the profile setting in Photoshop is not consistent with the printer driver settings, wrong colors will result.
All of my posts are my opinions.
In the HP Support Forums, clicking on the Kudos star is how you can appreciate.

Can someone please help me with printing?

Let me preface by saying that I've been using Aperture since 1.5 came out, taken Aperture seminars and became a "Certified Aperture Guy" as defined by Apple, read the books, listened to all the podcasts, belong to AUPN, and posted here, etc. etc. So I THINK I know the basics (god, I hope I do), but yet I cannot get printing to come out right to save my life...BUT IT COMES OUT RIGHT WHEN I PRINT FROM PSE 6 or iPhoto...ARGHH! Why? A million times, Why?
The scoop: I use the HP B9180 printer, calibrate my monitor with Spyder 3, correctly set up the print settings with "Application Managed Colors" and so on. I use the paper/ICC profiles for that printer. I soft-proof in Aperture for that paper I will print on. And yet... there is always something not right. Today it was a purplish/cyan color cast. Yesterday the print colors turned out very unlike the ones on my 24" iMac monitor. They might be too dark, too washed out, less saturated than what I had on the display, etc. I even had poor results when I ordered prints through Aperture -- very washed out, bland. Tested printer...fine. Inks full and test page is perfect.
I'm wasting paper, and asking questions all the time. And I'm really getting fried on this.
The kicker is that my prints come out pretty darn good from iPhoto, Photoshop Elements 6, or when I let the B9180 control the colors instead of Aperture. Why? Why can these apps produce very good results (which shows that I must understand SOMETHING about this process) but Aperture gives me aerobic exercise from my computer to my printer and back half the night?
I've already asked about in-camera color space settings and have been told by several people to go either sRGB or Adobe RGB because it won't matter since "Aperture takes care of all the color management." But still, I have these printing problems with both spaces.
Would shooting only JPGs and using Aperture produce better results? I shoot RAW right now. Does it matter anyway? Thanks for any help or understanding.
Jerry

I calibrated my monitor and then I'm given a profile to set it to. I use this calibrated profile for viewing, right?
Correct.
In a colour matching session irrespective of the ICC-enabled application, the ICC MNTR Monitor profile for the current condition of your digital colour display is the DESTINATION.
In the Apple ColorSync Utility, you will note that peripherals are registered and that registered peripherals have a factory fallback ICC device profile.
A digital colour device can have multiple conditions, for instance, your digital colour display can have different resolution settings and different gamma settings.
When you configure to a condition, you are able to characterise that condition in an ICC device colour profile. In other words, the same hardware is a different colour device for each colour condition.
The ICC colour device profiles for whatever conditions you configure are installed under the factory fallback ICC device profile (the same applies if you have more than one display, for instance).
Note: Your ICC MNTR Monitor profile captures the gamma of the video system in the VCGT Video Card Gamma Tag implemented for ColorSync 2.5 in 1998.
When you subsequently select one of your monitor profiles, the video system is reset to the gamma in that monitor profile.
The ColorSync Team wanted to end the war for the video system caused by conflicting gamma tools that fought for control in the system startup phase.
You are NOT supposed to repeat history by applying a gamma correction at print time in Aperture as in that case the colour appearance is not defined and delimited by your ICC device profiles.
If ten different photography studios using ten different runtime gamma corrections for the same digital original, they will wind up with ten incompatible colour appearances.
Apply a gamma correction atop the ICC colour management system is a lowend solution to the problem of studio lighting. The Profile Connection Space is D50 and a display-to-print viewing condition is supposed to be D50, but if the display is too bright or the lamp that lights the print is too dim then changing the gamma at print time is a lowend solution - but it chaotifies colour communication. A better solution is to learn to set up the studio viewing condition correctly. I posted a link to Joseph Holmes and Andrew Rodney on this forum previously. I don't remember if the Solux workflow recommended there is as per ISO recommendations for viewing conditions, but that's probably also discussed in the link.
If so I noticed in the ColorSync utility that when I compare this monitor's profile to the profiles in my HP ICC list, all the HP profiles are much out of the gamut and shaped significantly different. They barely match up.
Correct, but you've got the technical information I have you wrong. Which isn't really your problem, but rather a problem in the way things worked out in the International Color Consortium.
I told you not to select sRGB, but the sRGB colour space is expressed as an ICC MNTR Monitor profile and therefore appears in the Apple ColorSync Utility alongside your measured monitor profile.
You will find that your measured monitor profile and sRGB are about the same size and shape. The reason is that sRGB is the colour space of HDTV, i.e. a Sony cathode ray tube at 6500 Kelvin.
The difference between your measured monitor profile and sRGB as ICC profile is that sRGB has linearised gray i.e. R%=G%=B% defines gray throughout the colour space.
This is not the case with your measured monitor profile, and since your measured monitor profile is not linear you should not be using it as SOURCE for your digital originals - only for viewing them.
I thought a good calibration and matching the ICC profiles in soft proofing and in print setup is what it took to get a good match.
Correct, but you need to know enough that you can set up colour matching sessions using the right ICC profiles with the right rendering intents, and if you want side-by-side matching across applications you need to be able to configure application settings for compatible assumptions.
And as if that wasn't enough (... -:)) a colour measuring instrument is better than no colour measuring instrument, and a colour measuring instrument that makes fewer assumptions about the device is better than a colour measuring device that makes more device-dependent assumptions.
If memory serves, the Spyder is a colourimeter and not a spectrophotometer. This difference has caused considerable discussion, starting with the X-Rite Monitor Optimizer in the period 1996-2000. A colourimeter makes assumptions about the spectral power distributions.
Previously, colourimeters made assumptions based on cathode ray tubes that did not match the behaviour of red in liquid crystal displays. Presently, it appears that colourimeters are making assumptions about green based on liquid crystal displays that does not match light emitting diode displays (or was it that they carried over crt assumptions, offline flame wars, online flame wars, whatever) but the bottom line is that a spectophotometer is the safer solution.
/hh

Images too dark? colorsync issue or corruption?

I am not sure if this is related to Aperture, or not, but it is impacting the quality of my experience in Aperture...
I have noticed that my MBP2007 display profile seems too dark, and I think there is some preference or application that is loading at startup that is interfering with it. I am using the default LCD profile for the MBP, and have made sure there are no other profiles selected (selecting other profiles does not appear to change the results in any positive way).
Here is what I have observed: I noticed in Aperture that all my images seemed to need correction for being too dark. This is strange, since my Nikon seems to be taking perfectly balanced photos. So I started to dig around and remove all preferences that were associated with any color application I have used. I restarted and noticed that when the desktop image first appeared (a photo I had taken) it looked like it had the correct tonal range. Also, all the images in Aperture looked correct! However, this was short lived, and now each time when I restart, the process starts the same way, with the image appearing correctly at first, but then, as the menu bar started to appear, the image suddenly became too dark, as though a profile had just been applied! I have looked at the Console log, but cannot see anything that looks suspicious in terms of something that may be loading and interfering with the profile. I have tried to delete colorsync preferences, but have not been able to correct the issue again! Any ideas? I am really stumped by this!
Thanks for any help!

Hmm ... interesting. The ICC type MNTR Monitor profile for the display should be shown in the Devices section of the Apple ColorSync Utility.
A generic ICC profile for the make and model of display is shown as Factory Profile and a measured ICC profile for the specific calibration state of the display is shown as Current Profile.
The ICC MNTR profile shown in Apple ColorSync Utility > Devices > Display > Current Profile should be the same as the one shown in System Preferences > Display > Color.
Apple ColorSync 2.5 introduced the VCGT Video Card Gamma Tag that sets the state of the video system to the state described in the measured profile.
This was - and is - intended to do away with the difficulties caused by competing gamma utilities e.g. Knoll Gamma for Photoshop that tried to take control of the video system on startup.
(selecting other profiles does not appear to change the results in any positive way).
The intention of some who were involved in the ICC architecture was that working space profiles would by type SPAC Color Space, but then Apple and Adobe wanted type MNTR Monitor profiles to do this job.
This produced the problem that type MNTR Monitor profiles have to do double duty, both as monitor profiles in which equal amounts of RGB do not produce gray and as working space profiles in which equal amounts of RGB do produce gray.
So, this is why System Preferences > Display > Color shows both measured monitor profiles and monitor profiles for RGB working spaces such as sRGB, eciRGB, adobeRGB and so on and so forth. If you click a profile that is not your measured monitor profile, you reset the video system.
Instead of resetting the video system, as you may be doing, install a good ICC profiling packing, calibrate your monitor, and characterise that state in a monitor profile that will be automatically installed by your ICC profiling package.
Not all problems are configuration problems, some are bugs too, but if one has a sense of what the different dialogues do and how they are supposed to work together then problems produced by system misconfiguration can at least be eliminated in troubleshooting.
/hh

Best Logging approach when using ALSB

Hi,
We are exploring various possibilities for logging with ESB (i am using ALSB version
3.0).
I was thinking of using Log4J logging to SysLog (http://wiki.apache.org/logging-log4j/syslog) to capture metrics from different processes.
I have intereactions in my web application (MyWebApp) where i have to fetch some results from a 3rd party web application (MyWebApp2) and i use the ESB to interact between the 2 applications.
I can depict the interections to be of the form depicted below.
Browser --> MyWebApp network request / MyWebApp processing / MyWebApp -ESB network request / ESB processing / ESB-MyWebApp2 network request / MyWebApp2 processing ) -
How can i capture or measure performance profile ?
Among other alternatives
I was thinking if i can use Log4j as a seperate service and can invoke it within the ESB each time i want to log something.
The only concern i have with this is that it might turn out to be a costly operation.
Can Some one provide me a quick reply for this as i need to wrap it a bit quickly.
Cheers
Edited by: user8352312 on Oct 28, 2008 11:40 AM

Currently OSB 10gR3 is out! with nice cool stuff (debugging).
But, you could at logging to your service by applying log actions in your service. This wil generate log information in the log file. Or you could create Alert or Report actions.
Marc
http://orasoa.blogspot.com

6601 sample and hold

Hi,
I have a probe set in quadrature count mode. I have it connected to an SCB-68, which is in turn connected to a PCI-6601 card. I am using a C program to read the counter values from this probe.
I also have a swinging arm (parallel to the floor) mounted on a rotary encoder which is connected to an MID-7652 box, which is in turn connected to a PCI-7342 card, used to control the servo motors to move the swing-arm. The 6601 and 7342 card are connected by an RTSI cable. The idea is to read the probe counter value while the arm is swinging about its pivot in order to measure surface profiles. It is important to know the exact arm position when the probe is read, and so latency is an issue. I am able to create an use breakpoints for the swing-arm.
Since latency is an issue I am looking to trigger a reading of the probe counter every time the arm reaches a breakpoint. I can do this using a C program but there is a delay between the breakpoint being reached when the arm reaches a breakpoint and the probe being read while the software executes lines of code.
How can I use the breakpoint output from the 7342 as a trigger to latch the value of the counter of the probe 6601 onto one of the NI-TIO registers?
Thanks
Attachments:
SampleAndHold.png ‏18 KB

Hi Chris,
I have tried to program a breakpoint output from the PCI-7342 board into the RTSI using the following function:
flex_select_signal(boardID, NIMC_RTSI4, NIMC_BREAKPOINT2);
Breakpoint 2 is the correct breakpoint output because my swing-arm is on axis 2 and I have been able to detect the output from pin 2 on the BP socket on the MID-7652 box.
However I am unable to detect anything in the corresponding RTSI pin (I have checked the pin connections diagram for a PCI board) using a multimeter or an oscilloscope. Please help!
Once I am able to detect something I am planning to program the input of the PCI-6601 using:
Select_Signal(1, ND_TRIGGER, ND_RTSI4, ND_LOW_TO_HIGH);
Is this the correct function to use?
As for latching the counter value into the save register, I haven't thought properly about that part yet. My thinking is that I will need to operate ina buffered mode. Is that correct?

Color Management, (Again!)

I know this has been discussed before, but I still haven't found anything that can help me solve the issue. It's starting to become a serious barrier to professional work, so any thoughts woudl be appreciated.
I have both the eye1Display2 and a Gretag-Macbeth color checker and regularly calibrate my monitor and camera profiles. I'm working with CS5. The colors in Photoshop are consistently far off from every other applicaiton outside of it. Even Flickr. I assume this is because of the color management, but I've even turned that off, (which gives me a warning message now every time I bring in an image), and the issue still occurs. Worse, the colors displayed working with RAW images are now different to those in the main interface, and even then, they are NOT the same outside of Photoshop, whereas all the other packages are consistent. My workaround right now is to save regularly and check in other packages but this is simply not good enough for adjusting curves, HSL, etc. I do a lot of work with skintones, which are particularly color-critical.
So my quesions are - how can I turn Photoshop's color management completely off so it's not applying any lookup at all to the color in any module?
If I WANT it to apply the color profile from the i1Display and the X-Rite Color Checker Passport sofware, how can I know this is being done and carried through from the RAW processing to the rest of the package?
Many thanks
Albert Hastings

ahast42696 wrote:
I have both the eye1Display2 and a Gretag-Macbeth color checker and regularly calibrate my monitor and camera profiles. I'm working with CS5. The colors in Photoshop are consistently far off from every other applicaiton outside of it.
If what you're saying here is that a fully color-managed application, like Photoshop, is delivering color that's different from non-color-managed applications, this is just what you should expect.
There is no such thing as system-wide color management. It just doesn't work that way. Individual applications do (or don't do, or even partially do) color-management.
This is key:
Color-managed applications perform transforms on the colors being displayed in pursuit of absolute color accuracy at the expense of consistency with non-color-managed applications.
Corrollary:
Some color-managed applications misinterpret some color profiles. It happens.
Expanding on what Dag has said in post #1 above, no transform takes place if the document profile matches the display profile.
So... IF you're working with documents in the sRGB IEC61966-2.1 color space (aka just "sRGB" for the purpose of this discussion) and IF you want the display of these images to match as often as possible between color-managed applciations and non-color-managed applications, this is one possible direction you can take:
1. Set your system to associate the system-provided sRGB profile with your monitor(s). This is done via OS configuration dialogs.
2. Set your monitor(s) to as closely match the sRGB color space as possible. Some monitors were manufactured to be close, and others have the ability to be set that way. Still others can't be directly set that way, but the system response can be tweaked with the basic controls (brightness, contrast, saturation, etc., as well as the curves adjustments in the video card drivers).
When the above conditions are met, you will see the following results:
A. sRGB image documents, which are the majority of those published online and are usually the default output from digital cameras, will appear consistently the same in color-managed (Photoshop) and non-color-managed applications. Depending on your needs you can configure Photoshop to work in the sRGB color space for creating your own images (this is actually Photoshop's default).
B. In Photoshop and other color-managed apps you will get good overall color-management of image documents in other color spaces, though you'll see just the out-of-gamut colors (i.e., those colors from a larger color space that just can't be displayed in the sRGB color space) as fully-saturated and thus somewhat inaccurate. In practice, most colors in most images fall within the sRGB gamut.
C. You'll see accurate color management by the partially* color-managed Internet Explorer 9, within the constraints of item B above.
D. Since the sRGB color profile that comes with every Windows system is well formed, and is the default, there is a near zero chance that a color-managed application will misinterpret it and produce screwy color. Such misinterpretation DOES happen with other profiles, a surprising number of times, even sometimes with profiles generated by good quality color measurement and profiling devices. Color profiles are not trivial, and some software simply can't use some profiles.
The real (non-trivial) trick in this strategy is actually getting your monitor to closely match the sRGB color space without using a monitor profile. However, it IS possible to get it close, and for many people "close enough" + "consistent across more apps" is better than "perfectly accurate in Photoshop but mismatching other apps". It can even be checked with a profiling device to help with the fine tuning.
-Noel
*IE9 interprets your document color profile and always transforms it into the sRGB color space, regardless of your monitor profile. Thus the only way to make the colors come out right is to have the monitor actually BE sRGB. So far, unfortunately, it appears IE10 in Windows 8 is following this same "half baked" strategy.

Color mismatch between CS4 and Canon PIXMA PRO6500

Hi there! I am trying to research if anyone else is having a problem with color mismatch between CS4 and their printer. Last night I printed a .tiff image out of CS4 to my Canon PRO6500 printer and the sky came out purple / pink! It was supposed to be a stormy grey color. I have the color management turned off on the printer settings. I have CS4 manages color turned on and the correct ICC profile selected for the paper I am using. When I do a soft proof in CS4 the image looks fine, but when I print I get something completely different, mostly with the sky (purple / pink) color! Just for the heck of it I did a Print Preview under my Page Setup and guess what, the sky actually shows purple / pink! So I have no idea what's going on. I checked all my setting, ink cartridges, tried different paper with the appropriate ICC profile and no dice. Still have a goofy looking sky! I thought PROOFING the image is supposed to show you how the printed image is going to look? apparently it doesn't because it's not. The Print Preview has an accurate representation of the print but I have no idea where the pink / purple sky is coming from. They are supposed to be stormy clouds as I said. I appreciate any help anyone can provide .
Sabciu

I have the color management turned off on the printer settings.
But do you have a measured color profile based on a sample print? Most likely not, so this is not doing anything in your favor. The current profile may present the defaults for a given printer, but not the actual density based on your other printer settings. So by all means, unless you can be sure to obey a full calibration throughout, turn on the printer CM. Also, since it is a Pro model, you may actualyl have to use the dedicated RIP software that was bundled with it to get correct results, not the default windows print engine.
Mylenium

Color mismatch Pixma MG5650 ?!

Hello,
I have bought recently a brand new Pixma MG5650 and so far it's been great (except maybe for beeing too nosy), but I when I print photos, I've noticed that the colors are not quite precise. I tested using the printer evaluator image from http://www.outbackphoto.com/printinginsights/pi048/essay.html and I have some issues with rendering the correct collours.
As for the setup, I have Yosemite (OSX) + Canon Glossy every day use paper and also with the correct photo type when printing. (Canon Glossy paper)
Is there anything that I can use to remediate the problem, without purchasing any additional color calibration tools?
Many thanks,
Marius

I have the color management turned off on the printer settings.
But do you have a measured color profile based on a sample print? Most likely not, so this is not doing anything in your favor. The current profile may present the defaults for a given printer, but not the actual density based on your other printer settings. So by all means, unless you can be sure to obey a full calibration throughout, turn on the printer CM. Also, since it is a Pro model, you may actualyl have to use the dedicated RIP software that was bundled with it to get correct results, not the default windows print engine.
Mylenium

How to connect to iPhone's webkit debugger?

Hi,
new iOS 6 feature is, that you can debug html and javascript running on device or simulator in desktop safari. I suppose, that this feature is based on Webkit Remote Debugging Protocol (https://www.webkit.org/blog/1875/announcing-remote-debugging-protocol-v1-0/)
How can I connect to webkit running on iPhone without desktop Safari? I can do this for mobile Chrome running on Android using websockets, but how can I do that for iOS devices?
Thanks,
Jan

becibecibeci
Did you find out if it was possible to connect to webkit on Desktop (Safari) or IPhone ?. Please share with me if you find out. We are developing a open source tool to make it easier to measure and profile web applications on mobile. We currently support Chrome and waiting for for Safari to support webkit remote debugging. The project is called Mobster and is on github https://github.com/linkedin/mobster
thanks
Hari

VI time measured through the profile performance

Hi all,
My app works not so fast as usual and I decided to measure time with the profile performance tool. But times in a report are much less then the real times. What is the matter?

Sorry for long silence. Here are my subVi's in attached files. They are parts of the big project and will not work by themselves. The subvi's work with one queue at the same time, but GetData.vi completes 100 while loops pretty faster than Dequeue&Graph.vi. It must be noticed that FastCorrection and Statistic connectors for Dequeue&Graph.vi were False during examination. When GetData.vi had stoped after 100 while loop cycles, Dequeue&Graph began to work faster, and I set this vi's to be executed in separated threads. But nothing have changed.
Screenshot is attached also. Waiting for you comments.
Attachments:
GetData.vi ‏46 KB
Profile.jpg ‏86 KB
Dequeue&Graph.vi ‏62 KB

Partner profile LI and unit of measure

Hi gurus,
I am experiencing a weird situation and probably you have any clue about it.
I have configured an output to send the Purchase order information via EDI. I have used the standard function and programs to create the output. I have created the condition record for that particular vendor and output.
Then i have created the LI partner profile in we20 with the vendor number and the message types ORDERS and ORDCHG and I have also included my output with the ME10 and the ME11 in each of the messages.
When i create the PO and the output is sent I have the PO number but then i have the standard error message " Update was terminated" with the error "There is no conversion factor for material and unit of measure !" I have reviewed the PO and i have used a UoM PC that i have as an ISO code.
the point is if I use a different LI partner profile with exactly the same information then the idoc is sent without any problem. I have deleted the partner LI that I orinally created and i created it again as a copy of the one that is working but without sucess.
I have reviewed the vendor master data...but all is exactly the same.
I think or there is some config missing or that I have created the partner profile incorrectly. But it is rare that the partner profile has any link to the UoM.
Do you have any idea what it can be?
thanks so much

I understand from your mail, you have maintained the ISO equivalence to your UOM. When you change your vendor in WE20, did you change that information in MN04? This is the place where the right output type is triggered.
Other than that make sure you configured all the necessary items in WE20 -> Outbound Parameters -> process code and all otehr necessary settings.
Let me know, how it works?
Regards,

Energy Profiler Error - All measurements not possi...

I have a 5800 XPM - I have energy profiler installed. have used the programme reasonably sucessfully until now. Every time I start it a message comes up "All measurements are not possible, Channel is reserved by another application".
I have not other apps running and I have restarted the phone.
Cannot figure out why this is happening, but it renders the energy profiler useless.
I was hoping to use it to find out why my battery life is so poor.
Anyone else having the same problem and how can it be fixed???

I think i did hear somewhere, that after installation of Nokia Battery Monitor the Energy-Profiler does not work any more.
Did you install Battery Monitor?
If yes... switch it of,.... reboot... maybe you have to even de-install the Battery Monitor...

MEASUREMENTS IN ACTIVITY USAGE PROFILE

Please see enclosed link 'printscreen', how is it possible to see, in the Activity Usage Profile, the measurements (hours or manpower,etc.) in the chart blocks,
specific per month?
And P6 does not show the actual hours + curve (actual progress till January 2011)
Thanks in advance for your response, regards,
WP
Edited by: WP Hertel on 18-jan-2011 12:09
Edited by: WP Hertel on 31-jan-2011 15:27

Modify your timescale to Month.
1. Right-click on the graph and select the Activity Usage Profile Options.
2. Click on the Graph Tab
3. Select the checkbox 'Calculate Average'
4. Select the 'hours' per month by typing them in (this won't work in P6 7.0 with no service pack). 173 hours is the default and this will convert the Axis to 'bodies'.
If you want to see exact numbers, double-click in the graph and a popup window will appear.
Regards,
Steve Clements

Investment measure settlement doubles after investment profile change

We changed the indicator "Summary Settlement/Line Item Settlement" in Investment Profile (which was already used for Investment Measures) and "Amount and Percentage" indicator to allow the amount wise capitalization of AuC/Investment Measure on various fixed assets.
Now, while we try to settle the amount through CJ88, the system is settling the values that were already settled in previous periods. As a result the expenses become understated and Asset are over stated. How can we resolve this issue while we have already changed the Investment Profile as mentioned above.?

We are trying to settle March 2014 period therefore we can't carry out any new postings other than settlement.
For your reference, here is the Case:
EAC003 is an expense account and primary cost element
ABA001 is CWIP Account with Statistical Cost Element
The amount posted in March 2014 on account EAC003 is 323,813 which has value type 4 (Actual). When we run the settlement, the system settles the amount 3,053,065 (including 2,729,252 of value type 11: Statistical Actual)

Measuring 3d profile of wrinkles

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for