MEK2 condition record Issue.

Hi,
User needs to delete Billing factor from MEk2 transaction code for condition type 'xxxx' for profit center xxxx. He is able to delete from VK12. But he is not able to delete from MEk2 or MEK4(deleted but still showing the condition records with deletion indicator)..I want the whole record to be deleted which should not be showin even with del indicator.
Thanks
Ravi

Thanks Rahim,
Why i have a problem is user is saying in VK12(sales) when he deleted record the whole entry is getting disappeared. But in MEK2 it is not disappearing.
VK12 & MEK2 are condition record change transaction codes

Similar Messages

Condition record Issue..

Hi,
When I am trying to see the condition information for condition type in VK12 or VK13 i am getting
following error -
"759 System error: Report RV13AABX could not be generated"
How to solve this problem?
Regards,
Rahul
Edited by: Rahul on Jan 12, 2009 9:42 AM

Hi Rahul,
This problem may occurs because of validity periods overlapping, suppose if one validity period is there that is from jan 1 2009 to 31.12.9999, suppose if you if ur using BDC to update the conditon records with validity periods 01.02.2009 to 31.12.9999 system will accept and in this case this issue will raises.
Steps to reconstruction: go to data base table in which these condition records are stored and check any validity periods are opverlapped if there change them in the debug mode.
Regards,
kishore.

FM for Internal Condition record MEK1/MEK2 and VK11/VK12

Hi,
Is there any function module to update the internal condition record for both Purchasing(MEK2) as well as SD condition records(VK12).
My requirement is to update the price and price unit in the gross price condition(PB00) and sales price condition (VKP0).
if so Please let me know.
Thanks in advance
Vinoth R

Hi,
yes you can use he sam module for both conditions:
Function module RV_CONDITION_COPY
paramertes MAINTANI_MODE - 'A' Create; 'B' change
there is no possibility to delete a condition
COMMIT WORK and
Afterwards call RV_CONDITION_RESET to initiailize all global data of condition maintenace.
Regards,
Remek

Price on condition record no issue

Hi,
I am working on report to print the PR00 value of material.
Report is working fine but the material whose price had chaged is not picking write price .( picking first time entered price)
Tables :A515 and konp . I am picking the price on basis of condition records no equality from both tables.
But material whose prices is changed many times and has same no of condition records are created.
In that case the first condtion recod is matched and first time enterd Price is picked.
But i need latest or last updated Price. How to overcome this issue ?
Thanks

Any relavent info regarding issue :
I am working on report to print the PR00 (condition type ) value of material.
Report is working fine but the material whose price had chaged is not picking write price .( picking first time entered price)
Tables :A515 and konp . I am picking the price on basis of condition records no equality from both tables.
But material whose prices is changed many times and has same no of condition records are created.
In that case the first condtion recod is matched and first time enterd Price is picked.
But i need latest or last updated Price.
Thanks

Condition record number issue

Hi,
I have a situation where in a SA with LP agreement type, one item has 3 conditions PB00 for different periods.
Valid from Valid
Valid from
valid to
Price
01.01.2013
01.02.2013
10
02.02.2013
01.03.2013
11
02.03.2013
31.12.9999
10
Now in A016
Rows 1 and 3 have the SAME Condition record number, So changing Price in row one automatically changes row 3. How can this be resolved?
Thanks.
Richard
Message was edited by: Ajay Richard

Hi Raghavendra,
I do not have access to the this particular system!! so is this normal procedure what the SS shows. So basically if the price on the future validity period is changed the old/past validity is automatically updated? But why is there a link between the two. If you see the screenshot the other 2 validity periods have a different condition record number.
This is unrelated to prev question but on my client I see that in the SA I can only give one validuty period per item level. How do I enter multiple validity periods with different prices in a SA for one live item? The "Change gross condition PB00 validity Period" : All fields are greyed out.
Thanks.
Message was edited by: Ajay Richard

FM to create & update Shipment Cost Condition Records (TK11/12)

Hi All,
I am looking for a FM which can update Price and Validity dates in existing Shipment Cost condition records and also able to create a new shipment cost condition record.
I have tried using BAPI_PRICES_CONDITIONS. It returns a success message but no change in shipment cost condtion record
I have tried giving OPERATION = 009 to create new record and OPERATION = 004 to update existing one. But of no use.
Can i use any of the RV_CONDITION_* function modules
RV_CONDITION_MAINTENANCE
RV_CONDITION_COPY
If yes then what are the mandatory parameters I have to pass in.
Or else creating a BDC program for TK11/12 is the option.
Appreciate a quick and positive response.
Regards,
Leona.

Hi,
I have used the BAPI 'BAPI_PRICES_CONDITIONS' . In my requirement there was no need to update the scale.
Hope the below links will help you in solving your issue.
BAPI for VK11,VK12,MEK1,MEK2
http://www.sapnet.ru/viewtopic.php?p=765&sid=88b6f60f85501678fc93cd16e187ad61
Regards,
Leona

Some condition records

hi,
could you explain about CONDITION RECORDS maintenance for FRIGHT. my requirement is
for 1 carton is Rs.56/- and more than one carton of material i want to calculate with that & gross weight also should be calculated, could any body explained this issue. I want to use scales is it right.
i have some requirement like that,
regards,
m s r prakash

Hi Shankar,
1a) Assign an access sequence for your frieght condition type. (M/06)
1b)Then you can create condition records for frieght condition with validity periods. (MEk1/MEk2)
1c)Ensure that your PO (and vendor master) have price date category 5 (GR date)
2) Yes. Possible.
a) Condition type should be of 'Delivery cost condition'
b) Define Transaction/event key
c) In the pricing procedure for this condition type, assign the Txn/event key in accrls column. This key determines that amount will be posted to another account.
Also, position the condition type after your tax related condition types so that tax is not calculated.
d) In OBYC, define GL Accounts for this Trasaction/event key (check with FI team)
if you give me brief i can help you out more.
if helpful REWARD points
Thank you .
Regards
Ram

Free goods condition records - Usage in Sales Order

HI,
I have so many condition records in various KOTN9xx tables, which are for issuing free goods. If I see a sales order item, that is a free good, how do I know, on what basis (based on which condition record, in which condition table) that free good was issued?
Technically speaking: Similar to KONV table for storing transaction data on pricing, is there a table for storing transaction data on free goods?
Thanks,
Juwin

Find the table number of the key combination of customer / material . & you can extract free goods condition records from this table.
Search in SE11 with the table number.

Error while creating a pricing condition record.

Hi
I am trying to use the Material Group 1 (MVGR1) field from the field catalog to create a pricing condition table(9 series). I was able to create the table with MVGR1 as one of the columns but when I try to maintain condition records in the table, System gives me the following error. I have maintained certain values in the config for material group1. there is neither F4 values for the field Material group nor I can type in config values of MVGR1 in that field. I am getting this error. Any help on how to get past this issue will be highly appreciated.
Thanks
Object Material group 1 not provided with characteristic AS. (Note other fields!)
Message no. VK432
Diagnosis
The value entered in a field is not permitted.
System response
The system issues an error message.
Procedure
Check the entry and make the necessary corrections. Note any relationships between the individual fields. Entries in other fields may also be incorrect.
Example: There are two fields for maintaining the country and region. These fields are linked. The country chosen would be permitted if it were by itself. So would the region. But the region may not be in the the country chosen. In this case, an error message is issued. The country should then be corrected, not the region!
Edited by: Suraj Ramakrishnan on Dec 24, 2009 2:45 AM

Message no. VK432
Check note 750841
thanks
G. Lakshmipathi

ERROR Message while creating Rebate condition record T code VBO1

Dear Experts,
I am getting error message while creating rebate condition record T code-VBO1-Error Msg-862 system cannot read the structure for table,because of this i could not create condition record.
Please give the solution to create condition record.
Regards
siva

Hi,
You said you are trying to do this stuff in IDES right.
If you are using IDES provided by a company and where many people play on IDES, then you can get many such issues...
This is by our experience. Today you do something in IDES and tommorow that thing or config is screwed up by others.
If you have your own IDES, then check the suggestion given by the forum Guru's.
Regards,
SB

Different Tax condition records picked on sales order and invoice

Dear Expert,
I have a scenario where the goods supply from plant to different country sales organization customer. it is a n export order.
. sales order has been processed with ship to address in Portugal. We did enter end user VATnumber on the ship to customer. When you look under conditions the MWST is 0.00 which means VAT will not be invoiced.
while creating the order MWST condition calculated correctly by using the export access sequence, but when creating the invoice w r t sales order i am getting the domestic tax access sequence record.
in my case it is wrong, the same sales order MWST condition amount needs to be copied to invoice as well.
after going to condition tab of that billing document, select MWST and click on "Condition Record" I found below different values in sd order conditions and invoice conditions:
invoice:
SD-Order:
Can you kindly help me on this? :-)
Regards,
Yashar

Ideally, you should have a different pricing procedure for domestic and exports and I am not sure, why you have not created one more pricing procedure for exports.
Coming to your query, it seems, the issue is VAT registration number in which case, have a look at the following notes:-
Note 371764 - VAT registration number: Destination country
Note 15244 - Incorrect VAT amount is displayed
Note 148505 - VAT registrtn.no.fr.ship-to & n.fr.sold-to party
G. Lakshmipathi

Free Goods Condition record usingT.Code VBN1

Hi all,
We are creating a free goods condition record using T.Code VBN1.
We want to ensure that main item & free goods items are only shipped out together. How do we enable this using delivery controls in T.Code VBN1.
Regards,
Tom.

We are working with free goods in the sales order and to enable this we have done exclusive free goods config.Record for the same is maintained in T.code VBN1.
Now in the sales order we have 2 line items. First line item is the main item and the second is free goods item. Sometimes, only main item stock is available and no stock of free goods. In this case the main item gets delivered which should not happen.
We want to ensure that the main item and free goods item are delivered together on a date only when both the items are available. How do we enable this.
Hope this explains the issue. Look forward to your reply.
Tom.

Missing Condition record price in PO history tab

Hi
I have a scenario where in the condition record values are coming in conditions tab of PO and the discounts are calculated and shows net price which is less than the Gross price in conditions tab, But when i check in Purchase order history tab, for goods receipt, only Gross price is coming not the Net price.
can any one help in this??

Hi,
The po price will be greyed out if the price is determined based on discount or similar conditions. You have to change the price at item level - conditions tab.
But in your issue, the PO is already having subsequent documents. (Hope you found the issue in dev only, not in PRD) You may cancel the already posted documents (GR and IR). Now, correct the condition type (acrual flag in M/06) and then assign the acrual key against the condition type in the pricing schema in M/08. Assign the GL account for the acrual key in OBYC. Create a new PO and test the scenario again.
Regards,
AKPT

Condition record is missing in sales order

can u please help me on my issue,my issue is in my sales order there are the different types of materials are there,on which the tax is applicable as12.5% on few materials,20% on few materials,on service materials tax is 10%, 2%, 1%,depending on this i have mapped the conditions and it is calculating accordingly,but when i see in sales order by selecting one material,when i go to conditions,analysis of that particular line item,it shows 10% 2% 1% condition records are missing,same wise verse when i select another condition and see the analysis it shows 12.5% condition record is missing,when i go and select the another condition,if i check the analysis it shows 20% tax condition record is missing,but its not throwing any error,and showing document is complete,can any one suggest is it the right procedure or i have to make any changes in to it.

Hi
I see no issue in this. It is correct system behaviour.
When you have different tax rates for different materials, obviously the condition records will be accessed based on the entries maintained for each material.
E.g For material with 12.5% tax rate when you check in vk13, you will find only that entry and no entries for 20% and 10%, 2% and 1%.
So the access sequence fetches only what has been maintained in VK11 for each material.
This is absolutely fine. Go ahead and save the order.
Regards
Madhu

Tax condition types issue in sales order

Hi Friends,
I am bit lost with the following issue. I have searched sdn and other SAP forums for this. There were similar issues discussed but they didnu2019t solve my issue. There was exactly similar issue but it was unanswered. So I am posting the issue here to get some inputs.
This is the Indian tax scenario. I have configured pricing procedure where I have JVAT and JCST. If the company is selling to customer in the same state where company is located letu2019s say region 05 JCST 2% applicable. If the customer is outside region 05 then 5% JVAT should applicable.
=> In the pricing procedure it was like
150 0 JVAT
160 0 JCST
Both will be calculate on the gross value.
=> I have created two new tax classifications for customer master.
JCST   2   Tax liable outside region 05
JVAT 3    Tax liable inside region 05
So in the customer master I have both JCST and JVAT. I have created a customer with region 05 and in customer master under Billing document tab I have entries like below
Country    Name   Tax Category   Name   Tax classification Description
IN              India        JCST                IN: CST              2                  Tax liable outside region 05
IN              India        JVAT               IN: VAT              0                  Tax Exempt
=> I have created condition record for JCST with the following key combination
Country u2013 IN
Region of dlv. Plant u2013 05
Region u2013 05
TaxClass1-Cust. -- 2
TaxCl.Mat u2013 1
Amount u2013 2 percentage
Tax code u2013 A1 (TAXINN A1 2% Output tax)
=> With the above condition records maintained for JCST and maintaining tax classification as 2 for JCST and 0 for JVAT, I assume in Sales order SAP should calculate tax JCST 2 percentage. But in sales order SAP is not considering JCST and JVAT. For JVAT it makes sense as it does not have condition records. But I didnu2019t get the reason for not getting JCST. When I checked analysis and click on JCST condition type it says condition record is missing. Surprisingly when I click on the access details it shows u201CTaxClass1-Cust. as 0u201D it didnu2019t show as 2 as maintained in the customer master.
When I change the Tax classification for JVAT from 0 to 1 or from 0 to 3 in the customer master, in the analysis when I click on access details for JCST it shows tax classification maintained for JVAT that is as 1 or 3 so it seems SAP is not considering JCST in customer master at all. Why is that so?
The access (condition table) for JCST and JVAT are same.
Any inputs?

Hai SAP_2006,
We are also having similar requirement and inform the USER to maintain
In our customer master we gave like
Customer master:
Sales area data
Billing documents
JTX1     Tax Jurisdict.Code d     1     Full Tax 12.5%
JTX2     Tax Jurisdict.Code d     1     Full Tax 12.5%
JTX3     Tax Jurisdict.Code d     1     Full Tax 12.5%
JTX4     Tax Jurisdict.Code d     1     Full Tax 12.5%
To get LST we maintain
Country u2013 IN
Region of dlv. Plant u2013 05
Region u2013 05
TaxClass1-Cust. -- 1
TaxCl.Mat u2013 1
Amount u2013 12.5 percentage
Tax code u2013 A2 (TAXINN A1 12.5% Output tax)
To get CST
Country u2013 IN
Region of dlv. Plant u2013 05
Region u2013 06
TaxClass1-Cust. -- 1
TaxCl.Mat u2013 1
Amount u2013 12.5 percentage
Tax code u2013 A2 (TAXINN A2 12.5% Output tax)
In case if they want CST 2%, then user has to go
Sales order header Biiling
Alt tax Classification : Shouls change the Blank to 2 in the 1 box out of 4.
for that we maintained condition record as
Country u2013 IN
Region of dlv. Plant u2013 05
Region u2013 06
TaxClass1-Cust. -- 2
TaxCl.Mat u2013 1
Amount u2013 12.5 percentage
Tax code u2013 A3 (TAXINN A3 2% Output tax)
This doesn't require to change customer master regularly and default system finds LST or CST 12.5 unless they change to 2% system will not change automatic. So CST 2% Vs CSTfull tax risk is also avoided.
Regards,
Mani

MEK2 condition record Issue.

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for