Memory on server

I have Oracle on Unix. Can you tell me the command to know the RAM on the server. Also, please, the command to know the size of the database, like how much GB it is. I hope, my question is clear.
Please help in solving the doubt.
regards

to find RAM size on different platforms
AIX $ /usr/sbin/lsattr -E -l sys0 -a realmem
Linux $ /usr/sbin/dmesg | grep "Physical:"
HP $ grep MemTotal /proc/meminfo
Solaris $ /usr/sbin/prtconf | grep "Memory size"
Tru64 $ /bin/vmstat -P | grep "Total Physical Memory"
also you can use vmstat command in unix
to check database size you need to use sql command
sql> select sum(bytes) from dba_data_files;

Similar Messages

1 SQL instances with several archive Databases using all AWE RAM memory of server

Hello,
I just migrated my accounting system to a new SQL Server deployment of the software.
We just purchased the expensive SQL Server enterprise to accomodate.
I have some replicated databases to of lower priority that I put on the same instance that we occasionally query. I also imported a 70GB old archive DB that we on very rare occasions. We are not concerned about performance on these databases
as we are about the accounting DB on the same instance.
The MAX memory was set to unlimited on that instance. As soon as I put in this monster 70GB archived databases the AWE memory usage used up my full 30GB of RAM.
Is there a way to set the memory usage so the archive databases do not get loaded into the AWE but still the critical accounting system DB on the same instance is taken care of?
Or do I have to shell out another $3-6k for a separate instance? SQL Server Express has a 4GB limitation and one of the backup DB we don't really care about is 20GB replicated from Azure.

Hi,
>>70GB archived databases the AWE memory usage used up my full 30GB of RAM.
How did you checked that Archived database is using 30 G did you used sys.dm_os_buffer_descriptor.Do SQL server have locked pages in memory
SQL Server bring pages in memory if it is requested ,if you access Archived database heavily its bound to take memory but if yous top accessing it and access your other database SQL server will flush out pages of archive IF REQUIRED.
SQL server manages memory dynamically so I guess you do not need to worry
>>s there a way to set the memory usage so the archive databases do not get loaded into the AWE but still the critical accounting system DB on the same instance is taken care of?
No ,there is no way buffer pool is shared region
Please mark this reply as answer if it solved your issue or vote as helpful if it helped so that other forum members can benefit from it.
My TechNet Wiki Articles

VM does not assign all available memory to Server 1.5Gig missing

We have a number of different servers all with 5gig memory. However I can only assign 3046m to the VM
I am running on Oracle VMs with Oracle Enterprise Linux 64bit on these machines. However there is a large discrepency with the Memory on the VM and the actual memory in the machines, here is some information I have:
On the server itself if I do free -m gives me:
Total: 563 used: 205 free: 357
xm info|grep mem gives:
total_memory : 5046
free_memory : 1343
dmesg |grep mem gives
vmalloc area: e4800000-feffe000, maxmem 377fe000
Memory: 495616k/584704k available (2051k kernel code, 80632k reserved, 818k data, 176k init, 0k highmem)
My understanding of the above is that the Machine is allocated 0.5gig and the Current VM is assigned 3gig leaving almost 1.5gig unassigned and free. However, if I log into the VM Manager and try and assign the extra free memory to the VM, I get an error saying the maximum I can assgin is 3046.
In VM Manager I check the sever tab for the machine the VM is assgined to I can see:
Memory Size(MB): 3046.
xm list gives the following information, which I think sort of confirms my assumptions:
Name ID Mem VCPUs State Time(s)
70_ebstestapps 1 3046 2 -b---- 303.6
Domain-0 0 563 4 r----- 83.4
I am guessing this is my problem. Although the memory is available on the machine, when creating the server with VM Manager it is only picking up 3046!! I am unable to edit this value and have tried rebooting the server but the same value appears.
How can I fix this problem? any help in this would be greatly appreciated.
Zeki
Edited by: user4862131 on 21-Jan-2010 02:48

-Hi,
By reading the various e-mails it appeared as if people were complaining about the "server itself" seeing ~512Mb and it was on that basis that I send out my reply.
We have a 8 Quad-Core CPU system with 128Gb memory connected via Fibre Channel to a series of storage arrays. The storage array control software is installed on the base (dom0) VM so the device can be accessed via the fibre channel controller, and the storage can be configured and manged without any of the other virtual machines being create and/or running, as that is the storage were the VMs will ultimately be stored. The storage can be controlled over the network but that would require yet another system and we are trying to minimize the amount of hardware needed to manage the server. With only 512Mb of memory available to the dom0 VM, the software installation was taking forever because all of the 512Mb of physical memory available was used, and the system was swapping. So far everything is "working" for us so there must be enough of the Linux OS there to run the storage array control software.
My reply has no bearing for people addressing difficulties assigning some or all of available physical memory to virtual machines they create. Sorry for any confusion, but I'm new to OVM as well...

Large file copy to iSCSI drive fills all memory until server stalls.

I am having the file copy issues that people have been having with various versions of Server now for years, as can be read in the forums. I am having this issue on Server 2012 Std., using Hyper-V.
When a large file is copied to an iSCSI drive, the file is copied into memory first faster than it can be sent over the network. It fills all available GB of memory until the server, which is a VM host, pretty much stalls and also all the VMs stall. This
continues until the file copy is finished or stopped, then the memory is gradually released as it is taken out of memory as it is sent over the network.
This issue was happening on send and receive. I change the registry setting for Large Cache to disable it, and now I can receive large files from the iSCSI. They now take an additional 1 GB of memory and it sits there until the file copy is finished.
I have tried all the NIC and disk settings as can be found in the forums around the internet that people have posted in regard to this issue.
To describe in a little more detail, when receiving a file from iSCSI, the file copy windows shows a speed of around 60-80 MB / sec, which is wire speed. When sending a file to iSCSI, the file copy window shows a speed of 150 MB/sec, which is actually the
speed at which it is being written to memory. The NIC counter in Task Mgr shows instead the actual network speed which is about half of that. The difference is the rate at which memory fills until it is full.
This also happens when using Window Server Backup. It freezes up the VM Host and Guests while the host backup is running because of this issue. It does cause some software issues.
The problem does not happen inside the Guests. I can transfer files to a different LUN on the same iSCSI, which uses the same NIC as the Host with no issue.
Does anyone know if the fix has been found for this? All forum posts I have found for this have closed with no definite resolution found.
Thanks for you help.
KTSaved

Hi,
Sorry if it causes confusion but "by design" I mean "by design it will use memory for copying files via network".
In Windows 2000/2003, the following keys could help control the memory usage:
LargSystemCache (0 or 1) HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\CurrentControlSet\Control\Session Manager\Memory Management
Size (1, 2 or 3) in HKLM\SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\Services\LanmanServer\Parameter
I saw threads mentioned that it will not work in later systems such as Windows 2008 R2.
For Windows 2008 R2 and Windows 2008, there is a service named Microsoft Windows Dynamic Cache Service which addressed this issue:
https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/download/details.aspx?id=9258
However I searched and there is no update version for Windows 2012 and 2012 R2.
I also noticed that the following command could help control the memory usage. With value = 1, NTFS uses the default amount of paged-pool memory:
fsutil behavior set memoryusage 1
You need a reboot after changing the value.
Please remember to mark the replies as answers if they help and un-mark them if they provide no help. If you have feedback for TechNet Support, contact [email protected]

How can i found which program consume more memory in server

Dear Experts,
please do needful on below issue
in my servers one server is very slow i checked in all arear
but i didnot found any issues on my servers
now i have one doubt
is their any problem in abapers coading
so i need to check how much memory it will takes for sql statments
i dont know how can i get this requirment
so please tel me how can i check sql statments which they consuming more memory in my server
Regards

Hi,
please do needful on below issue
For the same, I suppose ?
Use Transaction ST03, choose the period (day, week or month), select "Memory Use Statistics" and sort by "Average Total Memory Usage " or "Maximum Extended Memory Usage".
Check specially if some programs use Private Memory.
Regards,
Olivier

How much memory sql server is using

Hi Experts,
I want to know how much of RAM is currently used by sql server.
is there a query for the same?
we are using sql server 2008 R2 SP2 on windows server 2008 R2 with a RAM of 48 GB. min memory as 40, max memory as 43GB.
thanks in advance.
Cheers, Vinod Mallolu

Hi Shanky
Thanks for the info. Perhaps you can clarify something for me on it.
If I run this on one of my production servers:
SELECT object_name, cntr_value MemoryUsageKB, cntr_value/1024 MemoryUsageMB,cntr_value/1024/1024 MemoryUsageGB
FROM sys.dm_os_performance_counters
WHERE counter_name = 'Total Server Memory (KB)';
select physical_memory_in_use_kb,
(physical_memory_in_use_kb/1024) as Phy_mem_MB,
(virtual_address_space_committed_kb/1024) as Total_mem_MB--memory pagefile+physical memory
from sys.dm_os_process_memory
I get this:
object_name
MemoryUsageKB
MemoryUsageMB
MemoryUsageGB
SQLServer:Memory Manager
118488256
115711
112
physical_memory_in_use_kb
Phy_mem_MB
Total_mem_MB
118363564
115589
231792
As I have LPIM enabled I'm surprised at the Total_mem_MB result, page file usage is at 0.09%. Any idea why it would be reported like that?
I'm also surprised that the DMV is reporting a lower number for physical memory usage than the perfmon counter, but I guess they're not measuring the exact same thing.
Edit: Version is SQL 2012 SP2 CU2....should have included that :)

Why "Target Server Memory" = "Total Server Memory" (Permanently)?

Hello,
could you please help me to understand why values of next Performance counters are permanently equal?:
SQLServer:Memory Manager / Target Server Memory (KB)
SQLServer:Memory Manager / Total Server Memory (KB)
22906680 = 22906680
even after we added 4 GB RAM to this server.
Technical details: ________________________________
Microsoft SQL Server: 2008-R2 (SP1) - 10.50.2500.0 (X64), Standard Edition,
- MIN server memory (MB): 4 096 (run_value)
- MAX server memory (MB): 2 147 483 647 (run_value)
Microsoft Windows: 2008-R2 NT 6.1 (Build 7601: Service Pack 1) (Hypervisor), Enterprise Edition,
HW: Virtual (VMWare),
CPU: 8 virtual (Intel Xeon X5550),
RAM: 24 GB.
This server is:
- dedicated for Microsoft SQL Server only,
- member of
"Microsoft Active Directory".
__________________________________________________________ If isn't above described anything, the following applies: Technical details: * OS: Windows Server v2008-R2, English, Enterprise Edition, x64, SP1 ** My User-Account is member of 'Administrators'
local security group. * MS-SQL-Server: v2008-R2, English, Enterprise Edition, x64, SP1 ** My User-Account is member of 'SysAdmin' db-role.

Hello Shanky_621,
as I promised - there are
monitored values. New counters are highlighted by green color. And finally counter "Memory \ Pages/sec" is here ;-) :
Time interval: 02.04.2015 07:00 - 16:00 (Sample interval = 15 seconds)
Performance Counter
Average
Minimum
Maximum
Memory \
Available MBytes
1 837.00
1 510.00
2 010.00
Memory \
Page Faults/sec
2 730.00
190.00
16 922.00
Memory \
Pages/sec
0.53
0.00
688.00
Paging File ()\ % Usage
1.89
1.89
1.89
Process(sqlservr) \ Page Faults/sec
1 737.00
26.00
4 948.00
Process(sqlservr) \ Page File MBytes
22 609.00
21 401.00
21 725.00
Process(sqlservr) \ Working Set (MB)
21 299.00
21 153.00
21 429.00
SQLServer:Buffer Manager \
Buffer cache hit ratio:
99.41
78.11
100.00
SQLServer:Buffer Manager \
Checkpoint Pages/sec:
42.00
0.00
1 263.00
SQLServer:Buffer Manager \
Free List Stalls/sec
0.00
0.00
0.13
SQLServer:Buffer Manager \
Free Pages
2 377.00
95.00
50 829.00
SQLServer:Buffer Manager \
Lazy Writes/sec
1.34
0.00
138.00
SQLServer:Buffer Manager \
Page Life Expectancy (PLE):
2 331.00
3.00
4 294.00
SQLServer:Buffer Manager \
Page Reads/sec
6 435.00
0.00
130 462.00
SQLServer:Memory Manager \
Memory Grants Pending
0.00
0.00
0.00
SQLServer:Memory Manager \
Target Server Memory (KB)
20 480.00
20 480.00
20 480.00
SQLServer:Memory Manager \
Total Server memory (KB)
20 480.00
20 480.00
20 480.00
SQLServer:SQL Statistics \
Batch Requests/sec
1 427.00
63.00
5 690.00
System \ Processor Queue Length
0.177
0.00
4.00

LockScreen.app using 3Gb real memory under Server 10.5.2

I'm using ARD to remotely administer a brand new XServe with 16 Gb system memory. I run long lived ARD sessions, typically using 'curtain' (screen lock) mode. I recently noticed that Activity Monitor claims that LockScreen.app is using more than 3 Gb of real memory. Has anyone else experienced this? Is this a memory leak in LockScreen.app? Is there any way to avoid this?
Thanks,
Geva

Permissions Repair is still slow in 10.5.2, but faster than before and with no error messages. On my MBP 160Gb with >1mil files and only 12Gb of free space, it took approximately 4 minutes instead of the 10+ minutes it took just prior to the upgrade. It still hangs on 1 Minute but then gets on with it quite a bit faster after the initial hang. Still much slower than in Tiger 'though.

SQL Server Performance Issue in Memory

Dear All
Can you please help me out of this below issue.
My Server having : Windows 2012 SD 64 bit
SQL : SQL 2008 R2 64 bit SP1
Memory : 64 GB
SQL Min Memory : 45 GB and Max memory : 55 GB so remaining 9 GB available
but my sql server any time shows 94% memory utilization. i have checked below points
Physical Memory_MB Physical Memory_GB Virtual Memory GB
65536 64 8192
Buffer Pool Usage at the Moment
BPool_Committed_MB BPool_Commit_Tgt_MB BPool_Visible_MB
56320.000000 56320.000000 56320.000000
Total Memory used by SQL Server Buffer Pool as reported by Perfmon counters
Mem_KB Mem_MB Mem_GB
57671680 56320.000000 55.000000000
Memory needed as per current Workload for SQL Server instance
Mem_KB Mem_MB Mem_GB
57671680 56320.000000 55.000000000
Total amount of dynamic memory the server is using for maintaining connections
Mem_KB Mem_MB Mem_GB
912 0.890625 0.000869750
Total amount of dynamic memory the server is using for locks
Mem_KB Mem_MB Mem_GB
40296 39.351562 0.038429260
Total amount of dynamic memory the server is using for the dynamic SQL cache
Mem_KB Mem_MB Mem_GB
2056 2.007812 0.001960754
Total amount of dynamic memory the server is using for query optimization
Mem_KB Mem_MB Mem_GB
2880 2.812500 0.002746582
Total amount of dynamic memory used for hash, sort and create index operations.
Mem_KB Mem_MB Mem_GB
0 0.000000 0.000000000
Total Amount of memory consumed by cursors
Mem_KB Mem_MB Mem_GB
28464 27.796875 0.027145385
Number of pages in the buffer pool (includes database, free, and stolen).
8KB_Pages Pages_in_KB Pages_in_MB
7208960 57671680.000000 56320.000000000
Number of Data pages in the buffer pool
8KB_Pages Pages_in_KB Pages_in_MB
6710944 53687552.000000 52429.250000000
Number of Free pages in the buffer pool
8KB_Pages Pages_in_KB Pages_in_MB
234598 1876784.000000 1832.796875000
Number of Reserved pages in the buffer pool
8KB_Pages Pages_in_KB Pages_in_MB
0 0.000000 0.000000000
Number of Stolen pages in the buffer pool
8KB_Pages Pages_in_KB Pages_in_MB
263418 2107344.000000 2057.953125000
Number of Plan Cache pages in the buffer pool
8KB_Pages Pages_in_KB Pages_in_MB
135772 1086176.000000 1060.718750000
Page Life Expectancy - Number of seconds a page will stay in the buffer pool without references
Page Life in seconds PLE Status
111450 PLE is Healthy
Number of requests per second that had to wait for a free page
Free list stalls/sec
373
Number of pages flushed to disk/sec by a checkpoint or other operation that require all dirty pages to be flushed
Checkpoint pages/sec
8052165
Number of buffers written per second by the buffer manager"s lazy writer
Lazy writes/sec
1247
Total number of processes waiting for a workspace memory grant
Memory Grants Pending
0
Total number of processes that have successfully acquired a workspace memory grant
Memory Grants Outstanding
0
My User asking how much sql transaction takes out off 55 GB , and each transaction how much takes, how to find sql healthy and sql needs how much memory.
Thanks
Mohamed Udhuman

Issue i mentioned here, Memory bottleneck is available or not , how to avoid sql buffer pool takes more memory means.
Thanks
Mohamed Udhuman
Hello,
Your output you posted does not makes sense or may be I am not able to understand it..If you want through analysis I need following from you
1.
select
(physical_memory_in_use_kb/1024)Memory_usedby_Sqlserver_MB,
(locked_page_allocations_kb/1024 )Locked_pages_used_Sqlserver_MB,
(total_virtual_address_space_kb/1024 )Total_VAS_in_MB,
process_physical_memory_low,
process_virtual_memory_low
from sys. dm_os_process_memory
2 What is reason for keeping Max server memory and Min server mmory almost equal. 55 G is MAX and 45 G is min.
3. Does SQL server account has locked pages in memory privilege ?
4. Did you see any out of memory error ?
5 Please post output of DBCC MEMORYSTATUS and SP_readerrorlog on skydrive and post location here.
PS: SQL server utilizing memory is normal behavior ,what you posted does not exactly points to memory pressure and what seems to me cause here is poorly written queries running.
Please mark this reply as the answer or vote as helpful, as appropriate, to make it useful for other readers
My TechNet Wiki Articles

Issue to use all memory installed on server

currently running crystal report server 2008 (12.1.0.882) Crystal 32bit on powerfull Dell server R 905 with 64 Gig memory..
There are currently 15 instances of Crystal running on this server, with each being allocated a maximum of 2GB. The aim of the design is for the memory to be chunk up into 2GB each and allocation to the 15 instances of Crystal (2GB x 15), therefore we donu2019t want the instances to exceed the 2GB limit imposed.
but all 15 instances use maximum 6 Gig memory on server even we have 64 Gig memory available. using page file and cpu goes to %100 and very slow performance.
using /pae switch in boot.ini and server shows all 64 Gig memory and can be use all these memories by a test application
thanks for sharing any information to resolve this issue.
Nick

Hi Nick,
I Believe you are using Crystal Reports Server Embedded and working with Lawson to resolve this issue which is why I moved this to the Java Development forum.
To get more details are you running 15 instances of Crystal RAS according to the CCM?
RAS is not pae aware and although you can use the boot.ini switch to increase this we highly suggest you don't. I also don't believe we will limit if you are trying to limit it to 2 gig.
Can you check the number of CPU's enabled in License Manager according to the key code?
Also, how many reports are you running at one time?
How many users are logged in?
Are the reports all on demand reports or are they being exported to some format and e-mailed out etc.?
If you working with Lawson possibly what we can do is set up a conference call?
Thank you
Don
PS - also note Crystal Reports Server is a standalone version of the full Enterprise produce but it is limited to one server and one PC. It is not the same as Crystal Reports Server Embedded which is standalone Crystal Report RAS and used for application development only. There is no SAP interface to it.
Edited by: Don Williams on Oct 24, 2009 9:53 PM

Run the SSIS Package using sql server Agent--Memory utilization Problem

Hi,
I have Created one SSIS Package it was working fine in BIDS but in SQL Server Agent it takes all the server memory and server gets very slow now.
in that ssis package i am using merge join,sorting tasks.Can you please suggest me how to handle in the memory usage for this..pls refer the below screen

Hi aravindhrm,
You can enable BufferSizeTuning logging event on the Data Flow Task to get how many rows in buffer. Or you can use Performance Counter to obtain more details about the buffers.
http://microsoft-ssis.blogspot.com/2013/04/performance-best-practice-more-rows-per.html
http://www.sql-server-performance.com/2009/ssis-an-inside-view-part-3/
Then, you can tweak the DefaultBufferMaxRows and DefaultBufferMaxSize size settings.
Besides, you can also go through the blog mentioned by Visakh and try suggestions such as increase OS pagefile size.
Regards,
Mike Yin
TechNet Community Support

SQL Server Memory usage is high

Hello,
One of our production SQL cluster is eating up more memory on server.
Here are the server specifications :
OS : Windows 2008 R2 Enterprise
SQL : SQL Server 2008 SP2 standard edition ( 2 node cluster )
Memory : 16 GB ( 8 Gb to SQL and rest to OS )
CPU : 8
This server is heavily used by CLR and linked server events.
I have seen the memory usage of databases , it's not using more than 7 GB and leaving 1 GB free in sql memory area ( from our Idera SQL dm
monitoring tool ). I'm suspecting CLR events are causing these spikes.
When i look at the task manager sqlserver.exe is using 15.7 Gb ( close to 16 GB )
Not sure how to see which process are using the memory.
Also we are seeing the below error messages in error log very frequently
10/27/2014 15:23:52,spid1s,Unknown,AppDomain 85 (xxxxxx) is marked for unload due to memory pressure.
I have looked at some blogs in internet, i didnt get any correct info. I have seen this is kind of bug in SQL 2005 32-bit system but we are
using 64 bit system.
http://support.microsoft.com/kb/969962
Can anyone please help me on this ?
Thanks in advance

Continuation of DBCC memorystatus output
CACHESTORE_TEMPTABLES (node 0) KB
VM Reserved 0
VM Committed 0
Locked Pages Allocated 0
SM Reserved 0
SM Committed 0
SinglePage Allocator 40
MultiPage Allocator 0
(7 row(s) affected)
CACHESTORE_NOTIF (node 0) KB
VM Reserved 0
VM Committed 0
Locked Pages Allocated 0
SM Reserved 0
SM Committed 0
SinglePage Allocator 16
MultiPage Allocator 0
(7 row(s) affected)
CACHESTORE_VIEWDEFINITIONS (node 0) KB
VM Reserved 0
VM Committed 0
Locked Pages Allocated 0
SM Reserved 0
SM Committed 0
SinglePage Allocator 16
MultiPage Allocator 0
(7 row(s) affected)
CACHESTORE_XMLDBTYPE (node 0) KB
VM Reserved 0
VM Committed 0
Locked Pages Allocated 0
SM Reserved 0
SM Committed 0
SinglePage Allocator 8
MultiPage Allocator 0
(7 row(s) affected)
CACHESTORE_XMLDBELEMENT (node 0) KB
VM Reserved 0
VM Committed 0
Locked Pages Allocated 0
SM Reserved 0
SM Committed 0
SinglePage Allocator 8
MultiPage Allocator 0
(7 row(s) affected)
CACHESTORE_XMLDBATTRIBUTE (node 0) KB
VM Reserved 0
VM Committed 0
Locked Pages Allocated 0
SM Reserved 0
SM Committed 0
SinglePage Allocator 8
MultiPage Allocator 0
(7 row(s) affected)
CACHESTORE_STACKFRAMES (node 0) KB
VM Reserved 0
VM Committed 0
Locked Pages Allocated 0
SM Reserved 0
SM Committed 0
SinglePage Allocator 0
MultiPage Allocator 8
(7 row(s) affected)
CACHESTORE_STACKFRAMES (node 64) KB
VM Reserved 0
VM Committed 0
Locked Pages Allocated 0
SM Reserved 0
SM Committed 0
SinglePage Allocator 0
MultiPage Allocator 8
(7 row(s) affected)
CACHESTORE_STACKFRAMES (Total) KB
VM Reserved 0
VM Committed 0
Locked Pages Allocated 0
SM Reserved 0
SM Committed 0
SinglePage Allocator 0
MultiPage Allocator 16
(7 row(s) affected)
CACHESTORE_BROKERTBLACS (node 0) KB
VM Reserved 0
VM Committed 0
Locked Pages Allocated 0
SM Reserved 0
SM Committed 0
SinglePage Allocator 48
MultiPage Allocator 0
(7 row(s) affected)
CACHESTORE_BROKERKEK (node 0) KB
VM Reserved 0
VM Committed 0
Locked Pages Allocated 0
SM Reserved 0
SM Committed 0
SinglePage Allocator 8
MultiPage Allocator 0
(7 row(s) affected)
CACHESTORE_BROKERDSH (node 0) KB
VM Reserved 0
VM Committed 0
Locked Pages Allocated 0
SM Reserved 0
SM Committed 0
SinglePage Allocator 8
MultiPage Allocator 0
(7 row(s) affected)
CACHESTORE_BROKERUSERCERTLOOKUP (node 0) KB
VM Reserved 0
VM Committed 0
Locked Pages Allocated 0
SM Reserved 0
SM Committed 0
SinglePage Allocator 8
MultiPage Allocator 0
(7 row(s) affected)
CACHESTORE_BROKERRSB (node 0) KB
VM Reserved 0
VM Committed 0
Locked Pages Allocated 0
SM Reserved 0
SM Committed 0
SinglePage Allocator 8
MultiPage Allocator 0
(7 row(s) affected)
CACHESTORE_BROKERREADONLY (node 0) KB
VM Reserved 0
VM Committed 0
Locked Pages Allocated 0
SM Reserved 0
SM Committed 0
SinglePage Allocator 32
MultiPage Allocator 0
(7 row(s) affected)
CACHESTORE_BROKERTO (node 0) KB
VM Reserved 0
VM Committed 0
Locked Pages Allocated 0
SM Reserved 0
SM Committed 0
SinglePage Allocator 8
MultiPage Allocator 0
(7 row(s) affected)
CACHESTORE_EVENTS (node 0) KB
VM Reserved 0
VM Committed 0
Locked Pages Allocated 0
SM Reserved 0
SM Committed 0
SinglePage Allocator 16
MultiPage Allocator 0
(7 row(s) affected)
CACHESTORE_CLRPROC (node 0) KB
VM Reserved 0
VM Committed 0
Locked Pages Allocated 0
SM Reserved 0
SM Committed 0
SinglePage Allocator 40
MultiPage Allocator 0
(7 row(s) affected)
CACHESTORE_SYSTEMROWSET (node 0) KB
VM Reserved 0
VM Committed 0
Locked Pages Allocated 0
SM Reserved 0
SM Committed 0
SinglePage Allocator 1856
MultiPage Allocator 0
(7 row(s) affected)
CACHESTORE_CONVPRI (node 0) KB
VM Reserved 0
VM Committed 0
Locked Pages Allocated 0
SM Reserved 0
SM Committed 0
SinglePage Allocator 48
MultiPage Allocator 0
(7 row(s) affected)
CACHESTORE_FULLTEXTSTOPLIST (node 0) KB
VM Reserved 0
VM Committed 0
Locked Pages Allocated 0
SM Reserved 0
SM Committed 0
SinglePage Allocator 32
MultiPage Allocator 0
(7 row(s) affected)
USERSTORE_SCHEMAMGR (node 0) KB
VM Reserved 0
VM Committed 0
Locked Pages Allocated 0
SM Reserved 0
SM Committed 0
SinglePage Allocator 16432
MultiPage Allocator 856
(7 row(s) affected)
USERSTORE_DBMETADATA (node 0) KB
VM Reserved 0
VM Committed 0
Locked Pages Allocated 0
SM Reserved 0
SM Committed 0
SinglePage Allocator 5592
MultiPage Allocator 0
(7 row(s) affected)
USERSTORE_TOKENPERM (node 0) KB
VM Reserved 0
VM Committed 0
Locked Pages Allocated 0
SM Reserved 0
SM Committed 0
SinglePage Allocator 3856
MultiPage Allocator 3960
(7 row(s) affected)
USERSTORE_OBJPERM (node 0) KB
VM Reserved 0
VM Committed 0
Locked Pages Allocated 0
SM Reserved 0
SM Committed 0
SinglePage Allocator 2328
MultiPage Allocator 0
(7 row(s) affected)
USERSTORE_SXC (node 0) KB
VM Reserved 0
VM Committed 0
Locked Pages Allocated 0
SM Reserved 0
SM Committed 0
SinglePage Allocator 656
MultiPage Allocator 0
(7 row(s) affected)
USERSTORE_SXC (node 64) KB
VM Reserved 0
VM Committed 0
Locked Pages Allocated 0
SM Reserved 0
SM Committed 0
SinglePage Allocator 8
MultiPage Allocator 0
(7 row(s) affected)
USERSTORE_SXC (Total) KB
VM Reserved 0
VM Committed 0
Locked Pages Allocated 0
SM Reserved 0
SM Committed 0
SinglePage Allocator 664
MultiPage Allocator 0
(7 row(s) affected)
OBJECTSTORE_LBSS (node 0) KB
VM Reserved 0
VM Committed 0
Locked Pages Allocated 0
SM Reserved 0
SM Committed 0
SinglePage Allocator 128
MultiPage Allocator 608
(7 row(s) affected)
OBJECTSTORE_SNI_PACKET (node 0) KB
VM Reserved 0
VM Committed 0
Locked Pages Allocated 0
SM Reserved 0
SM Committed 0
SinglePage Allocator 2008
MultiPage Allocator 56
(7 row(s) affected)
OBJECTSTORE_SNI_PACKET (node 64) KB
VM Reserved 0
VM Committed 0
Locked Pages Allocated 0
SM Reserved 0
SM Committed 0
SinglePage Allocator 0
MultiPage Allocator 56
(7 row(s) affected)
OBJECTSTORE_SNI_PACKET (Total) KB
VM Reserved 0
VM Committed 0
Locked Pages Allocated 0
SM Reserved 0
SM Committed 0
SinglePage Allocator 2008
MultiPage Allocator 112
(7 row(s) affected)
OBJECTSTORE_SERVICE_BROKER (node 0) KB
VM Reserved 0
VM Committed 0
Locked Pages Allocated 0
SM Reserved 0
SM Committed 0
SinglePage Allocator 424
MultiPage Allocator 0
(7 row(s) affected)
OBJECTSTORE_LOCK_MANAGER (node 0) KB
VM Reserved 32768
VM Committed 32768
Locked Pages Allocated 0
SM Reserved 0
SM Committed 0
SinglePage Allocator 4048
MultiPage Allocator 0
(7 row(s) affected)
OBJECTSTORE_LOCK_MANAGER (node 64) KB
VM Reserved 0
VM Committed 0
Locked Pages Allocated 0
SM Reserved 0
SM Committed 0
SinglePage Allocator 24
MultiPage Allocator 0
(7 row(s) affected)
OBJECTSTORE_LOCK_MANAGER (Total) KB
VM Reserved 32768
VM Committed 32768
Locked Pages Allocated 0
SM Reserved 0
SM Committed 0
SinglePage Allocator 4072
MultiPage Allocator 0
(7 row(s) affected)
Buffer Pool Value
Committed 1024000
Target 1024000
Database 793462
Dirty 36258
In IO 0
Latched 0
Free 171398
Stolen 59140
Reserved 0
Visible 1024000
Stolen Potential 913660
Limiting Factor 17
Last OOM Factor 0
Last OS Error 0
Page Life Expectancy 262733
(15 row(s) affected)
Process/System Counts Value
Available Physical Memory 69021696
Available Virtual Memory 8762135273472
Available Paging File 12716019712
Working Set 15196917760
Percent of Committed Memory in WS 100
Page Faults 897824874
System physical memory high 0
System physical memory low 0
Process physical memory low 0
Process virtual memory low 0
(10 row(s) affected)
Procedure Cache Value
TotalProcs 4573
TotalPages 53712
InUsePages 27
(3 row(s) affected)
Global Memory Objects Pages
Resource 412
Locks 509
XDES 219
SETLS 8
SE Dataset Allocators 16
SubpDesc Allocators 8
SE SchemaManager 1169
SE Column Metadata Cache 991
SQLCache 893
Replication 2
ServerGlobal 52
XP Global 2
SortTables 3691
(13 row(s) affected)
Query Memory Objects (internal) Value
Grants 0
Waiting 0
Available 756700
Current Max 756700
Future Max 756700
Physical Max 756700
Next Request 0
Waiting For 0
Cost 0
Timeout 0
Wait Time 0
(11 row(s) affected)
Small Query Memory Objects (internal) Value
Grants 0
Waiting 0
Available 12800
Current Max 12800
Future Max 12800
(5 row(s) affected)
Optimization Queue (internal) Value
Overall Memory 6723993600
Target Memory 5965963264
Last Notification 1
Timeout 6
Early Termination Factor 5
(5 row(s) affected)
Small Gateway (internal) Value
Configured Units 32
Available Units 32
Acquires 0
Waiters 0
Threshold Factor 380000
Threshold 380000
(6 row(s) affected)
Medium Gateway (internal) Value
Configured Units 8
Available Units 8
Acquires 0
Waiters 0
Threshold Factor 12
Threshold -1
(6 row(s) affected)
Big Gateway (internal) Value
Configured Units 1
Available Units 1
Acquires 0
Waiters 0
Threshold Factor 8
Threshold -1
(6 row(s) affected)
Memory Pool Manager Pages
Reserved Current 0
Reserved Limit 913664
(2 row(s) affected)
Memory Pool (internal) Pages
Allocations 59136
Predicted 248311
Private Target 0
Private Limit 0
Total Target 972800
Total Limit 972800
OOM Count 0
(7 row(s) affected)
MEMORYBROKER_FOR_CACHE (internal) Pages
Allocations 55358
Rate 0
Target Allocations 779847
Future Allocations 0
Overall 820800
Last Notification 1
(6 row(s) affected)
MEMORYBROKER_FOR_STEAL (internal) Pages
Allocations 3778
Rate 0
Target Allocations 728267
Future Allocations 0
Overall 820800
Last Notification 1
(6 row(s) affected)
MEMORYBROKER_FOR_RESERVE (internal) Pages
Allocations 0
Rate 0
Target Allocations 820800
Future Allocations 189175
Overall 820800
Last Notification 1
(6 row(s) affected)
DBCC execution completed. If DBCC printed error messages, contact your system administrator.

Memory utilization presented in Application Server Control

Hi
I have Oracle Application Server 10g R3 Patch Set 5 application server, which work in cluster. On mian page in Oracle Application Server Control I have memory column, where I can see information about memory utilization. I wonder about this information. For example, I have heap size set for 2 GB and application uses 300MB, but I have on main page Application Server Control 900 MB memory utilization for OC4J container. Why is so difference between use heap space memory (only 300 MB), and this information 900 MB? But sometimes, memory in Server Control rises to 2 GB, but application uses 300 MB heap space still. Why does occur this situation (much difference between uses heap space and memory presented on Server Control)?
Thanks awfully for help.
Regards
Edited by: Luk004 on 2012-01-16 03:30

> Central Instance : 1.2GB is physical memory is free out of 12GB.
> App1 Instance: 400MB is physical memory is free out of 10GB.
> App2 Instance: 2GB is physical memory is free out of 14GB.
>
> Right now, no background for dialog process are running in any of the three instances but still ocuupy lot of physical memory.
>
> Questions: How to calculate memory in ECC and where could be the rest of memory defined in system? No process is running and all memory seem to be consumed.
Memory is allocated
- by the operating system itself
- by the database (SGA_TARGET)
- by the application server buffers (ST02 et al)
- by the operating system as filesystem cache (if you e. g. use VxFS you may configure the memory consumption)
To see where the memory is being used, use OS tools like 'glance' or 'top'.
Markus

How to increase the memory in Event Server

I have this folowing error in the windows event observer (in french). The memory Event Server memory seems to be to small. (English message traduction : Insufficient memory in the Event Server"" ).
How can i increase this memory ? The physical server is dedicated to Crystal server.
Type de l'événement : Erreur
Source de l'événement : BusinessObjects_EventServer
Catégorie de l'événement : EventServer
ID de l'événement : 35750
Date : 13/10/2010
Heure : 09:56:51
Utilisateur : N/A
Ordinateur : SERVHLM3
Description :
Mémoire insuffisante dans l'Event Server
I have this folowing error in same time... that talk about maximum limit Windows offices reach
(English message traduction : "Attempt to allocate Windows 40 offices, only 19 have been allocated. It may be that the system has reached its maximum limit." ).
Do you know how this can happen ? And how to correct this ?
Type de l'événement : Erreur
Source de l'événement : BusinessObjects_crproc
Catégorie de l'événement : Général
ID de l'événement : 49301
Date : 13/10/2010
Heure : 09:56:54
Utilisateur : N/A
Ordinateur : SERVHLM3
Description :
Tentative d'allocation de 40 bureaux Windows, seulement 19 ont été alloués. Il se peut que le système ait atteint sa limite maximum. Contactez votre administrateur système.

As Ankur said, there are not parameters for this setting.
Probably what you can do is, you can add this server to a defined server group.
Generally you can assign additional resources to a server group. That could probably help you to increase performance.
Regards
Gowtham

Adobe Form Server 5.1 Memory Problems

FSService.exe increases memory when serving forms but never releases it.
The forms are of the Form Server type and they have several calls to an InHouse COM Component.
The COM Component was developed to encapsulate the calls to our Legacy systems via ODBC, COMTI, etc.
We have detected that the FSService releases the memory when serving forms that doesn't make calls to our COM Component.
We want to know if this behavior is normal when calling COM Components from the forms or is this a bug and if so if there is a way to solve it?
Thanks...

1) I don't know what you've typed in when installing... but I've never seen that message. Are you using any language specific characters ?
Do you get the error after this screen ?
<b>
The suffix is the root of your directory tree. You may have more than
one suffix.
Suffix [dc=sun,dc=com]:
</b>
If yes, then this means that the value you typed in is not a valid DN... and you must enter a valid one.
2)The Directory Server is installed under /usr/iplanet but the database is under /var/iplanet/ds5 and configuration is under /etc/iplanet/ds5 ...
You can use symbolic links if you want to move things around.
3) You mean you downloaded the tar.gx file of iDS 5.1 and install it on Solaris 9... No problem, I do this every day. As long as you have right to create directories and files, you should be able to install as anyone. If not, you should install as root and then let the server run as a special user.
4) Solaris 9 comes with iDS5.1 packages already installed. But the server is not configured at all.
Running directoryserver setup allows you to configure it and create the database, accounts...
Running directoryserver uninstall remove the instance of the installed database... It doesn't remove the packages. You can start again a setup...
By the way, I think that iDS 5.1 on Solaris 9 comes with the full documentation... May be you should start by reading it.
Regards,
Ludovic.

Memory on server

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for