Messages getting stuck in tcp_local Channel

Hi All
Version
Sun Java(tm) System Messaging Server 6.1 HotFix 0.01 (built Jun 24 2004)
libimta.so 6.1 HotFix 0.01 (built 12:52:04, Jun 24 2004)
SunOS dakota 5.9 Generic_112233-12 sun4u sparc SUNW,Sun-Fire-V440
Background
In the last week we've been experiencing problems with outgoing messages getting stuck in our tcp_local channel. They can stay for up to 4 hours before dequeuing. We plan to install Patch 116568 which is the latest core patch for our version of the Messaging Server.
To date we haven't experienced any DNS problems and have not made any configuration changes.
However I was just wondering if anyone had come across this type of problem before? We're hoping the patch will resolve the issue but would be interested in other alternatives.
Thanks in advance
Paul

You'll have to do more research before I can offer help. . .
It's not unusual for some messages to be retried, and depending on the destination, that may take a while.
Some outside domains are always slow. If you have many messages queued for such outside domains, they can involve the whole server, and cause mails to queue up behind them.
Many installations create a new channel, such as, "tcp_slow", and use rewrite rules to move messages addressed to these domains (aol, hotmail, earthlink, etc.) into this separate channel. You can "tune" that channel differently, and messages there won't block tcp_local.

Similar Messages

  • Messages getting stuck in SMQ2

    Messages get stuck in SMQ2 with the Error msg "SQL error on database occurred when accessing a table".
    This is happening on PI system 7.11 SP04 with Max DB version 7.7.06.07.
    This typically happens when sending messages from one BPM to another although it has more of a random pattern.
    A corresponding dump is also seen in ST22.
    The dump details are as below:
    Runtime error : DBIF_RSQL_SQL_ERROR
    Exception : CX_SY_OPEN_SQL_DB
    Database error text : Invalid numeric value for parameter/column (10)
    Internal call code : "[RSQL/UPDT/SWFRXIHDR ]"
    Any help is highly appreciated in resolving this issue.
    Regards,
    Murali Narayanan

    > The dump details are as below:
    > Runtime error : DBIF_RSQL_SQL_ERROR
    > Exception : CX_SY_OPEN_SQL_DB
    > Database error text : Invalid numeric value for parameter/column (10)
    I would update the kernel (plus the database interface library lib_dbsl) to the latest patchlevels and try again. If the error persists I'd upgrade the database to the latest patchlevel. If it still doesn't work I'd open an OSS call (BC-DB-SDB).
    Markus

  • Message getting stuck in XBQO queue - Time limit exceeded

    Hi All,
    We have a BPM scenario in our project (on PI 7.0 SP18), where bundle of PEXR2002 Payment IDocs are received as a single flat file. This file is then consumed by the BPM, to split the message into multiple payments using Java Mapping.
    However, when we get an IDoc file of size greater than 5 MB (more than 500 IDocs), the message gets stuck in XBQO queue and eventually giving a SYSFAIL with the message "Time limit exceeded". Could you please let us know if you have encountered a similar issue and are aware of a possible solution.
    Any pointers to this will be really appreciated.
    Thanks & Regards,
    ROSIE SASIDHARAN

    H Rosie,
    1)  Goto SXMB_ADM-> Integration Engine Configuration->Parameter  EO_MSG_SIZE_LIMIT->possible values 0 - 2,097,151 (KB)
    The parameter EO_MSG_SIZE_LIMIT enables serial processing of messages of a particular size. This applies for messages with the quality of service Exactly Once (EO). If the message is larger than the parameter value, the message is processed in a separate queue.
    2)  Goto SXMB_ADM-> Integration Engine Configuration->Parameter  HTTP_TIMEOUT->possible values n Seconds, where n is a whole number.
    The parameter Specifies the timeout for HTTP connections (time between two data packages at line level). This value overrides the system profile parameter icm/server_port_n (for example, icm/server_port_0 : PROT=HTTP, PORT=50044, TIMEOUT=900). If you do not set the parameter HTTP_TIMEOUT or if you set the parameter to 0, then the setting for the system profile parameter is used.
      See SAP Note 335162  for sysfail issue....
      Hope these will help u....
    Regds,
    Pinangshuk.

  • Messages getting stuck in QRFC Queue

    Hi,
    Today I noticed that a message had gotten stuck with the status "Sheduled for Outbound Processing" (scenario IDOC->XI->File), XI 3.0 SP11.
    This in turn had the effect that the whole QRFC queue got stuck, and all following messages got stuck with status "Sheduled".
    I had to remove the first message from the queue manually so that XI could start to purge the other messages from the queue.
    What could be the reason for the first messages getting stuck with this status ("Sheduled for Outbound Processing")?
    The message was very small, just a couple of lines. One thing that comes into mind, is that XI received 4 IDOCS for the same interface, within one second. These 4 messages were assigned to different queues, but one of them got stuck. Could there be problems with XI when several messages arrive on the same interface within a very short time?
    Is it possible to use Alerts to detect this kind of problem in the future? As I have understood, Alerts only handle XI "errors", but according to XI, this message did not have an "error status", it just had the status "Sheduled for Outbound processing"..
    Thanks for any help,
    Hans

    Hi,
    If the message got struck in Queue, you try to activate the queues in smq2 to reprocess the data instead of deleting it. This is the final solution. But you should able to see a dump in ST22 for this problem.
    thanks,
    sasi

  • From time to time, my outgoing mail messages get stuck in the "outbox".  I'm having trouble resolving the problem.

    From time to time, my outgoing mail messages get stuck in the "outbox".  I'm having trouble resolving the problem.

    I use Comcast. My computer (Mac Air) also uses my iCloud and Me accounts. The message I get back says they are all offline.

  • Messages gets stuck up in active state

    Hi ,
    In our production environment, we are facing strange issues for the past 1 week.
    Issue 1:
    Messages gets stuck up in active state. In our message tracking mechanism ,the status is successfully sent to destination party. The message should not hold up in active state in first place?
    If we restart the Host instance, it is creating duplicate and processing it which is creating misssing ICR issue.
    Per day message flow-200 messages
    Please suggest ?
    Kind Regards,
    Giri.a
    girishkumar.a

    Hi Girish, 
    I believe OFTP adapter is not native adapter(in box) for BizTalk Server.
    So, is there any logging mechanism in OFTP adapter?
    Also, can we connect to the FTP server using some other tool like Filezilla etc. If other 3rd party products are also not able to connect to this server then we can say that its not a BizTalk issue.
    Thanks,
    Prashant
    Please mark this post accordingly if it answers your query or is helpful.

  • Messages getting scheduled in SAP ECC Box:Messages getting stuck in Inbound

    The scenario is -
    JDBC Sender-->> SAP PI-->> ECC Server(via ABAP proxy)
    The Interface is running properly in SAP PI & then the messages are getting posted to the Inbound queues in SAP ECC Box. Generally it takes few seconds for the messages to get processed, but now all are getting scheduled in the Inbound queues(in different channels as seen in SMQ2)
    We re-ran the interfaces again a few times, but all of them kept getting scheduled. Finally, after 2 hours one of the messages got processed. I suppose we won't face any problem now onwards.
    Though I can see several suggestions like registering the queues & assigning dedicated queues to the interface, none of the blog suggest the probable cause of the event?
    Can this be due to some issue in the server(heavy pressure of data in the server during the period/issue in the queues??)
    I found the following links regarding issues like these --
    XML file getting stucked in queue in ECC
    Message in scheduled state
    Thanks

    Is the printing issue with one specific printer or across system.
    What method you have configured for output device.
    There should be any issue if you add spool work process to Application server.
    Then you should be able to configure spool server load balancing. (Search on help.sap.com for spool load balancing)

  • Email messages getting stuck in Outbox

    I have regular problems with my sent emails getting stuck in my Outbox when using verizon.net mail.   The problem only occurs with verizon.net and only on my tablet (Nexus 7), not on my PC.   Both are on same wireless network so I don't think it is due to interruption in connection.   Is there some adjustment I need to make?

    Gmail is a deliberately broken implementation of IMAP that often causes problems with Mail. The problem seems to have gotten worse in Mavericks. Google has no incentive to make Gmail work well with any mail client, because the company makes money by delivering targeted ads via the Web. The Gmail servers analyze your messages to gather information about you and your contacts that Google can then sell to marketers, or to anyone who will pay for it. You agreed to those terms when you registered a Gmail address. The marketers—not Gmail users—are Google's customers and the ones it aims to please.
    I suggest either not to use Gmail at all, or to access it through the website as Google intends. You might get better results with another email client. I don't recommend any one in particular.
    If you insist on trying to make Gmail work with Mail, the following links may help:
    Configuring OS X Mail For Gmail Without Duplicates
    Setting up Apple Mail to Rock and Roll with Gmail
    Apple Mail and Gmail Part Deux

  • JMS Messages getting stuck in queues

    Hi,
    I am facing this peculiar issue with queue messages not getting picked up.
    Application Architecture: There is 1 JMS queue ( which resides in WLDomain1 with in a Unix Box) and there are 2 windows boxes having 2 weblogic domains each with 3 instances of MDB deployed on each of the domains. So total of 12 consumers (2 Box * 2 Domain * 3 Instances of MDB) listens to the JMS queue.
    Issue: After bringing everything up I am able to see 12 consumer count listening to the queue. But when I run the application which writes total of 13 messages in the queue only 7 of them are getting processed and 6 messages are always getting stuck in the queues. Interestingly this 7 messages are mostly getting processed by consumers with in the same windows box. And the selection of windows box is completely random. To confirm whether both the windows boxes are configured fine I tried to test them individually and it works fine individually, the problem happens only if I bring up both the boxes together.
    Another observation is, if I bring down the non working domains, the pending messages start getting processed by the working domains. It gives an impression that the non working domains seem to lock the messages for processing but doesn't actually process it. Only when I bring down the domains it releases this lock.
    Below is the JMS Life cycle events I captured from log files :
    1. Start domain1 in WIN Box1
    ####<Nov 24, 2009 7:54:00 PM CST> <> <> <1259114040304> <783400> <> <> <JMSModule!Queue> <ConsumerCreate> <<anonymous>> <MC:CA(/<IP_BOX1>):OAMI(server.jms.connection59.session60.consumer62)> <> <>
    ####<Nov 24, 2009 7:54:00 PM CST> <> <> <1259114040309> <239900> <> <> <JMSModule!Queue> <ConsumerCreate> <<anonymous>> <MC:CA(/<IP_BOX1>):OAMI(server.jms.connection59.session63.consumer65)> <> <>
    ####<Nov 24, 2009 7:54:00 PM CST> <> <> <1259114040313> <2100> <> <> <JMSModule!Queue> <ConsumerCreate> <<anonymous>> <MC:CA(/<IP_BOX1>):OAMI(server.jms.connection59.session66.consumer68)> <> <>
    2. Start domain2 in WIN Box 1
    ####<Nov 24, 2009 7:54:55 PM CST> <> <> <1259114095403> <38600> <> <> <JMSModule!Queue> <ConsumerCreate> <<anonymous>> <MC:CA(/<IP_BOX1>):OAMI(server.jms.connection69.session70.consumer72)> <> <>
    ####<Nov 24, 2009 7:54:55 PM CST> <> <> <1259114095407> <335400> <> <> <JMSModule!Queue> <ConsumerCreate> <<anonymous>> <MC:CA(/<IP_BOX1>):OAMI(server.jms.connection69.session73.consumer75)> <> <>
    ####<Nov 24, 2009 7:54:55 PM CST> <> <> <1259114095410> <997700> <> <> <JMSModule!Queue> <ConsumerCreate> <<anonymous>> <MC:CA(/<IP_BOX1>):OAMI(server.jms.connection69.session76.consumer78)> <> <>
    3. Start domain1 in WIN Box 2
    ####<Nov 24, 2009 7:56:12 PM CST> <> <> <1259114172061> <316500> <> <> <JMSModule!Queue> <ConsumerCreate> <<anonymous>> <MC:CA(/<IP_BOX2>):OAMI(server.jms.connection79.session80.consumer82)> <> <>
    ####<Nov 24, 2009 7:56:12 PM CST> <> <> <1259114172066> <324300> <> <> <JMSModule!Queue> <ConsumerCreate> <<anonymous>> <MC:CA(/<IP_BOX2>):OAMI(server.jms.connection79.session83.consumer85)> <> <>
    ####<Nov 24, 2009 7:56:12 PM CST> <> <> <1259114172072> <757000> <> <> <JMSModule!Queue> <ConsumerCreate> <<anonymous>> <MC:CA(/<IP_BOX2>):OAMI(server.jms.connection79.session86.consumer88)> <> <>
    4. Start domain2 in WIN Box 2
    ####<Nov 24, 2009 7:56:54 PM CST> <> <> <1259114214000> <142800> <> <> <JMSModule!Queue> <ConsumerCreate> <<anonymous>> <MC:CA(/<IP_BOX2>):OAMI(server.jms.connection89.session90.consumer92)> <> <>
    ####<Nov 24, 2009 7:56:54 PM CST> <> <> <1259114214005> <38200> <> <> <JMSModule!Queue> <ConsumerCreate> <<anonymous>> <MC:CA(/<IP_BOX2>):OAMI(server.jms.connection89.session93.consumer95)> <> <>
    ####<Nov 24, 2009 7:56:54 PM CST> <> <> <1259114214009> <22400> <> <> <JMSModule!Queue> <ConsumerCreate> <<anonymous>> <MC:CA(/<IP_BOX2>):OAMI(server.jms.connection89.session96.consumer98)> <> <>
    At this point console shows 12 consumers listening the queue which is absolutely fine.
    5. Run application
    --Message Production
    This produces 13 messages ( I have not pasted the complete log)
    -- Message Consumption ( Only 7 messages are consumed)
    ####<Nov 24, 2009 8:00:05 PM CST> <> <> <1259114405953> <576400> <ID:<1047832.1259114392542.0>> <> <JMSModule!Queue> <Consumed> <<anonymous>> <MC:CA(/<IP_BOX1>):OAMI(server.jms.connection59.session63.consumer65)> <&lt;?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?&gt;
    &lt;mes:WLJMSMessage xmlns:mes="http://www.bea.com/WLS/JMS/Message"&gt;&lt;mes:Header&gt;&lt;mes:JMSTimestamp&gt;1259114392542&lt;/mes:JMSTimestamp&gt;&lt;mes:Properties/&gt;&lt;/mes:Header&gt;&lt;/mes:WLJMSMessage&gt;> <>
    ####<Nov 24, 2009 8:00:10 PM CST> <> <> <1259114410091> <310100> <ID:<1047832.1259114393181.0>> <> <JMSModule!Queue> <Consumed> <<anonymous>> <MC:CA(/<IP_BOX1>):OAMI(server.jms.connection59.session66.consumer68)> <&lt;?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?&gt;
    &lt;mes:WLJMSMessage xmlns:mes="http://www.bea.com/WLS/JMS/Message"&gt;&lt;mes:Header&gt;&lt;mes:JMSTimestamp&gt;1259114393181&lt;/mes:JMSTimestamp&gt;&lt;mes:Properties/&gt;&lt;/mes:Header&gt;&lt;/mes:WLJMSMessage&gt;> <>
    ####<Nov 24, 2009 8:00:10 PM CST> <> <> <1259114410130> <364600> <ID:<1047832.1259114400626.0>> <> <JMSModule!Queue> <Consumed> <<anonymous>> <MC:CA(/<IP_BOX1>):OAMI(server.jms.connection59.session63.consumer65)> <&lt;?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?&gt;
    &lt;mes:WLJMSMessage xmlns:mes="http://www.bea.com/WLS/JMS/Message"&gt;&lt;mes:Header&gt;&lt;mes:JMSTimestamp&gt;1259114400626&lt;/mes:JMSTimestamp&gt;&lt;mes:Properties/&gt;&lt;/mes:Header&gt;&lt;/mes:WLJMSMessage&gt;> <>
    ####<Nov 24, 2009 8:00:10 PM CST> <> <> <1259114410134> <540700> <ID:<1047832.1259114393125.0>> <> <JMSModule!Queue> <Consumed> <<anonymous>> <MC:CA(/<IP_BOX1>):OAMI(server.jms.connection69.session76.consumer78)> <&lt;?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?&gt;
    &lt;mes:WLJMSMessage xmlns:mes="http://www.bea.com/WLS/JMS/Message"&gt;&lt;mes:Header&gt;&lt;mes:JMSTimestamp&gt;1259114393125&lt;/mes:JMSTimestamp&gt;&lt;mes:Properties/&gt;&lt;/mes:Header&gt;&lt;/mes:WLJMSMessage&gt;> <>
    ####<Nov 24, 2009 8:00:10 PM CST> <> <> <1259114410137> <632400> <ID:<1047832.1259114393128.0>> <> <JMSModule!Queue> <Consumed> <<anonymous>> <MC:CA(/<IP_BOX1>):OAMI(server.jms.connection69.session73.consumer75)> <&lt;?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?&gt;
    &lt;mes:WLJMSMessage xmlns:mes="http://www.bea.com/WLS/JMS/Message"&gt;&lt;mes:Header&gt;&lt;mes:JMSTimestamp&gt;1259114393128&lt;/mes:JMSTimestamp&gt;&lt;mes:Properties/&gt;&lt;/mes:Header&gt;&lt;/mes:WLJMSMessage&gt;> <>
    ####<Nov 24, 2009 8:00:12 PM CST> <> <> <1259114412026> <984200> <ID:<1047832.1259114393123.0>> <> <JMSModule!Queue> <Consumed> <<anonymous>> <MC:CA(/<IP_BOX1>):OAMI(server.jms.connection59.session60.consumer62)> <&lt;?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?&gt;
    &lt;mes:WLJMSMessage xmlns:mes="http://www.bea.com/WLS/JMS/Message"&gt;&lt;mes:Header&gt;&lt;mes:JMSTimestamp&gt;1259114393123&lt;/mes:JMSTimestamp&gt;&lt;mes:Properties/&gt;&lt;/mes:Header&gt;&lt;/mes:WLJMSMessage&gt;> <>
    ####<Nov 24, 2009 8:00:16 PM CST> <> <> <1259114416045> <41800> <ID:<1047832.1259114400005.0>> <> <JMSModule!Queue> <Consumed> <<anonymous>> <MC:CA(/<IP_BOX1>):OAMI(server.jms.connection69.session70.consumer72)> <&lt;?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?&gt;
    &lt;mes:WLJMSMessage xmlns:mes="http://www.bea.com/WLS/JMS/Message"&gt;&lt;mes:Header&gt;&lt;mes:JMSTimestamp&gt;1259114400005&lt;/mes:JMSTimestamp&gt;&lt;mes:Properties/&gt;&lt;/mes:Header&gt;&lt;/mes:WLJMSMessage&gt;> <>
    6. At this point Admin Consol shows 6 messages pending in the queue
    and From consumer numbers it is evident that consumers in WIN Box2 domains have not processed any messages
    Now if I stop server in WIN Box2 Domain1, WIN Box1 picks up the messages instantely
    ####<Nov 24, 2009 8:13:22 PM CST> <> <> <1259115202343> <897600> <> <> <JMSModule!Queue> <ConsumerDestroy> <<anonymous>> <MC:CA(/<IP_BOX2>):OAMI(server.jms.connection79.session80.consumer82)> <> <>
    ####<Nov 24, 2009 8:13:22 PM CST> <> <> <1259115202346> <421900> <> <> <JMSModule!Queue> <ConsumerDestroy> <<anonymous>> <MC:CA(/<IP_BOX2>):OAMI(server.jms.connection79.session83.consumer85)> <> <>
    ####<Nov 24, 2009 8:13:22 PM CST> <> <> <1259115202379> <582300> <> <> <JMSModule!Queue> <ConsumerDestroy> <<anonymous>> <MC:CA(/<IP_BOX2>):OAMI(server.jms.connection79.session86.consumer88)> <> <>
    ####<Nov 24, 2009 8:13:24 PM CST> <> <> <1259115204888> <4600> <ID:<1047832.1259114400029.0>> <> <JMSModule!Queue> <Consumed> <<anonymous>> <MC:CA(/<IP_BOX1>):OAMI(server.jms.connection69.session76.consumer78)> <&lt;?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?&gt;
    &lt;mes:WLJMSMessage xmlns:mes="http://www.bea.com/WLS/JMS/Message"&gt;&lt;mes:Header&gt;&lt;mes:JMSTimestamp&gt;1259114400029&lt;/mes:JMSTimestamp&gt;&lt;mes:Properties/&gt;&lt;/mes:Header&gt;&lt;/mes:WLJMSMessage&gt;> <>
    ####<Nov 24, 2009 8:13:32 PM CST> <> <> <1259115212820> <256700> <ID:<1047832.1259114400258.0>> <> <JMSModule!Queue> <Consumed> <<anonymous>> <MC:CA(/<IP_BOX1>):OAMI(server.jms.connection59.session66.consumer68)> <&lt;?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?&gt;
    &lt;mes:WLJMSMessage xmlns:mes="http://www.bea.com/WLS/JMS/Message"&gt;&lt;mes:Header&gt;&lt;mes:JMSTimestamp&gt;1259114400258&lt;/mes:JMSTimestamp&gt;&lt;mes:Properties/&gt;&lt;/mes:Header&gt;&lt;/mes:WLJMSMessage&gt;> <>
    ####<Nov 24, 2009 8:13:43 PM CST> <> <> <1259115223579> <280600> <ID:<1047832.1259114400032.0>> <> <JMSModule!Queue> <Consumed> <<anonymous>> <MC:CA(/<IP_BOX1>):OAMI(server.jms.connection59.session60.consumer62)> <&lt;?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?&gt;
    &lt;mes:WLJMSMessage xmlns:mes="http://www.bea.com/WLS/JMS/Message"&gt;&lt;mes:Header&gt;&lt;mes:JMSTimestamp&gt;1259114400032&lt;/mes:JMSTimestamp&gt;&lt;mes:Properties/&gt;&lt;/mes:Header&gt;&lt;/mes:WLJMSMessage&gt;> <>
    7. At this poing Admin Consol shows 3 messages pending in the queue
    Now if I stop server in WIN Box2 Domain2, the remaining 3 gets processed
    ####<Nov 24, 2009 8:16:08 PM CST> <> <> <1259115368998> <193400> <> <> <JMSModule!Queue> <ConsumerDestroy> <<anonymous>> <MC:CA(/<IP_BOX2>):OAMI(server.jms.connection89.session90.consumer92)> <> <>
    ####<Nov 24, 2009 8:16:08 PM CST> <> <> <1259115369000> <885500> <> <> <JMSModule!Queue> <ConsumerDestroy> <<anonymous>> <MC:CA(/<IP_BOX2>):OAMI(server.jms.connection89.session93.consumer95)> <> <>
    ####<Nov 24, 2009 8:16:09 PM CST> <> <> <1259115369002> <902500> <> <> <JMSModule!Queue> <ConsumerDestroy> <<anonymous>> <MC:CA(/<IP_BOX2>):OAMI(server.jms.connection89.session96.consumer98)> <> <>
    ####<Nov 24, 2009 8:16:25 PM CST> <> <> <1259115385151> <123700> <ID:<1047832.1259114400324.0>> <> <JMSModule!Queue> <Consumed> <<anonymous>> <MC:CA(/<IP_BOX1>):OAMI(server.jms.connection69.session70.consumer72)> <&lt;?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?&gt;
    &lt;mes:WLJMSMessage xmlns:mes="http://www.bea.com/WLS/JMS/Message"&gt;&lt;mes:Header&gt;&lt;mes:JMSTimestamp&gt;1259114400324&lt;/mes:JMSTimestamp&gt;&lt;mes:Properties/&gt;&lt;/mes:Header&gt;&lt;/mes:WLJMSMessage&gt;> <>
    ####<Nov 24, 2009 8:16:29 PM CST> <> <> <1259115389660> <836600> <ID:<1047832.1259114400535.0>> <> <JMSModule!Queue> <Consumed> <<anonymous>> <MC:CA(/<IP_BOX1>):OAMI(server.jms.connection59.session63.consumer65)> <&lt;?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?&gt;
    &lt;mes:WLJMSMessage xmlns:mes="http://www.bea.com/WLS/JMS/Message"&gt;&lt;mes:Header&gt;&lt;mes:JMSTimestamp&gt;1259114400535&lt;/mes:JMSTimestamp&gt;&lt;mes:Properties/&gt;&lt;/mes:Header&gt;&lt;/mes:WLJMSMessage&gt;> <>
    ####<Nov 24, 2009 8:16:37 PM CST> <> <> <1259115397823> <610200> <ID:<1047832.1259114400432.0>> <> <JMSModule!Queue> <Consumed> <<anonymous>> <MC:CA(/<IP_BOX1>):OAMI(server.jms.connection69.session73.consumer75)> <&lt;?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?&gt;
    &lt;mes:WLJMSMessage xmlns:mes="http://www.bea.com/WLS/JMS/Message"&gt;&lt;mes:Header&gt;&lt;mes:JMSTimestamp&gt;1259114400432&lt;/mes:JMSTimestamp&gt;&lt;mes:Properties/&gt;&lt;/mes:Header&gt;&lt;/mes:WLJMSMessage&gt;> <>
    Kindly throw some light on this issue. Also do let me know if you need any more specific details about this.
    Thanks,
    Abhijeet
    Edited by: user5240164 on Nov 25, 2009 11:35 AM
    Edited by: user5240164 on Nov 28, 2009 1:21 PM

    Hi,
    The problem may be conflicting names in your configuration. To ensure proper operation of WL Security, JMS, JTA, and JDBC, make sure that (A) each domain has a unique name, and (B) no two WebLogic servers have the same name (even if in two different domains).
    To ensure a more even distribution of messages, either simply send more than a token amount messages (eg, a hundred or so, rather than just 12), or configure a custom connection factory on the domain that hosts the queue, reduce MessagesMaximum on the connection factory to 1, and then modify each MDB to refer to the custom connection factory. The MessagesMaximum setting controls the number of messages that can be pre-pushed (pipelined) to a single asynchronous consumer.
    For more information see "Best Practices for JMS Beginners and Advanced Users" in the latest versions of the JMS admin guide, and "JMS Performance & Tuning Check List" in the WebLogic Performance and Tuning guide.
    Tom

  • Messages getting stuck in Queue

    Hi All,
    In my scenario data is coming from database into XI and creating a file in SAP. The messages are getting stuck in the Queue and in message monitoring the status is showing as 'waiting'. Earlier the messages were getting successfully processed but system was running slow for the past two days. Is this because of system speed or some data issue?
    For testing pupose I have deleted the old messages from Smq2 and tried but every new message is getting stuck in the queue. Please suggest.
    Thanks,
    Aparna

    Please check the following blog :
    /people/stefan.grube/blog/2006/04/27/how-to-deal-with-stuck-eoio-messages-in-the-xi-30-adapter-framework
    try cancelling oldest messages, this should unblock queue
    Regards,
    Jamal

  • Messages getting stuck at the end of sending

    I have an iPhone 5 running iOS 6.0.1 and often my text messages will get stuck at the end of the sending progress bar.  Like this: http://i.imgur.com/iqxjo.jpg It'll slowly progress towards that point and then it'll just stop.  It will sit there anytime from a few seconds to a few minutes.  It usually happens to regular texts, but it occurs with iMessages occasionally too.  I can assure you it's my coverage/Internet connection is fine when this occurs.  I've contacted Verizon Wireless and they've done countless troubleshooting such as resetting things on their end, sending me a new iPhone, SIM card, etc.  I've done restores, I've used it without restoring form a backup, on a new phone, etc. and it continues.  This problem has NEVER occurred before I got my iPhone 5 running iOS 6.  iOS 6.0.1 didn't fix anything.  Considering iMessage is doing it too, I'm beginning to believe it's a glitch in iOS or the new iPhone.  Please help, this is a really annoying bug and anything would help.  Is anybody else having this issue? Thanks!

    I have solved it by this steps:
    1-I have removed the current iTunes(version 10.4.1)
    2-I have downloaded the iTunes from apple sites and installed
    3-after the installing process finished I want to the iTunes properties and the compatibility tab and marked 'Run as administrator'
    4-I lunched  the iTunes and gone through the security question and after that plugged in the iPhone and successfully restored it

  • File to File ------ Message getting stuck in Integration Engine

    Hi All,
    I have a small issue in file to file scenario .
    Once I send the file .Its getting picked up from the source directory but its not getting delivered to the destination directory.
    When I check in SXMB_MONI ,message is successfully processed.
    Now when I check in RWB. In Message monitring, In adapter engine its showing successful.
    but for Integration engine its showing "To be delivered".
    I am not able to understand the reason for this. Whether the issue is with configuration of the scenario or some other issues.
    So please help me out......
    Thanks,
    Rohit

    Hi,
    Make sure you have set the MaxThreadCount parameter to 350 or higher depending of the case and of the resources available.
    To increase the parameter, please follow the instructions below:
    1. In the left frame choose Server -> Kernel -> ApplicationThreadManager
    2. In the tab Display Configuration (right frame) choose Switch between view and edit mode to activate the edit mode.
    3. The parameter MaxThreadCount must be set to 350.
    4. You will then need to restart the J2ee
    For reference see note #937159 - XI Adapter Engine is stuck
    For specific setting to an adapter can be done by going to the Visual Administrator -> Services -> SAP XI AF Messaging
    Look at the property 'Messaging connections' here you will see the following queues:
    Send.maxConsumers (asynchronous sending - outbound)
    Recv.maxConsumers (asynchronous receipt - inbound)
    Call.maxConsumers (synchronous sending - outbound)
    Rqst.maxConsumers (synchronous receipt - inbound)
    Depending on where the bottleneck is occurring (i.e. too many entries in the Send.maxConsumers) you can increase these parameters.
    Example of parameter value syntax (sample for FILE adapter):
    (name=FILE_http://sap.com/xi/XI/System, Send.maxConsumers=10, Recv.maxConsumers=10, Call.maxConsumers=10, Rqst.maxConsumers=10)
    For reference see note:
    #791655 - Documentation of the XI Messaging System Service Properties
    And see the link:
    /people/kenny.scott/blog/2007/08/20/messaging-system-queue-properties-after-xi-30-sp19-xi-70sp11
    Regards,
    Caio Cagnani

  • Messages getting stuck in outbox

    Hi,
    I would imagine this is a problem that comes up regularly here, so if anyone could direct me to a thread that deals with it...... ?
    I need to send an email to multiple recipients I tried to do this but got a message back saying that the addresses weren't recognized. and then the email was consigned to the outbox, tried contacting my ISP about this, they tried to fix it but I am now unable to send ANY emails at all, they all just go into the outbox with an error message to check the smtp settings etc.
    Thanks

    Thanks Ernie, sorry for replying so late...
    OK since my post the other day my regular emails have suddenly decided to start working again (sending okay.)
    But the larger multiples still have problems. I am sending them in the Bcc field. There are around 60
    addresses and I have successfully sent out mails using this email group before. It's true that several of them
    bounce back being out of date or in some way unrecognized, I guess this is normal. but now I get a
    message saying --"the server smtp.wanadoo.es did not recognize the following recipients"--
    and there is a list of around 40 out of the 60 email addresses most of which look fine as email
    addresses. This is an ISP issue I know, I am waiting for wanadoo to contact me again about this problem.
    OK... Latest latest update is that I have just tried sending out emails 20 at a time (rather than 60) and they seem to
    be going out OK. Takes a bit longer but I guess ISPs are getting tighter than they used to be about spamming.
    Thanks for taking your time to reply the other day...
    Mark

  • Messages getting stuck in Delivering status in AE

    Hi all,
    Recently we are coming across messages that go into Delivering status. These messages mostly belong to File Sender/Receiver Adapter but not confined to them. Here is the audit log of one such message:
    2011-03-21 10:01:55 Success Write to file "/usr/sap/ZX2/EXT/XI_INTERFACES/SCP2PIF016/NOT_PROCESSED/goodsReceiptPosting_InvalidRecords20110321-100155-650.xml" as binary, size 1949 bytes
    2011-03-21 10:01:55 Success File processing complete
    2011-03-21 10:01:55 Success MP: Leaving module processor
    2011-03-21 10:01:55 Success The message was successfully delivered to the application using connection File_http://sap.com/xi/XI/System.
    2011-03-21 10:01:55 Error Setting the message status to DLNG failed, due to: com.sap.aii.af.ra.ms.api.DeliveryException: Error updating status..
    On searching in SDN I found one work around-- to restart Messaging Service in Visual Admin. This did work as the messages got processed after that. But, the problem seems to be recurring now(once in every two days).
    Can any body shed some light on this to find the permanent fix?
    Thanks a lot,
    Gokul.

    Hi,
    Make sure you have set the MaxThreadCount parameter to 350 or higher depending of the case and of the resources available.
    To increase the parameter, please follow the instructions below:
    1. In the left frame choose Server -> Kernel -> ApplicationThreadManager
    2. In the tab Display Configuration (right frame) choose Switch between view and edit mode to activate the edit mode.
    3. The parameter MaxThreadCount must be set to 350.
    4. You will then need to restart the J2ee
    For reference see note #937159 - XI Adapter Engine is stuck
    For specific setting to an adapter can be done by going to the Visual Administrator -> Services -> SAP XI AF Messaging
    Look at the property 'Messaging connections' here you will see the following queues:
    Send.maxConsumers (asynchronous sending - outbound)
    Recv.maxConsumers (asynchronous receipt - inbound)
    Call.maxConsumers (synchronous sending - outbound)
    Rqst.maxConsumers (synchronous receipt - inbound)
    Depending on where the bottleneck is occurring (i.e. too many entries in the Send.maxConsumers) you can increase these parameters.
    Example of parameter value syntax (sample for FILE adapter):
    (name=FILE_http://sap.com/xi/XI/System, Send.maxConsumers=10, Recv.maxConsumers=10, Call.maxConsumers=10, Rqst.maxConsumers=10)
    For reference see note:
    #791655 - Documentation of the XI Messaging System Service Properties
    And see the link:
    /people/kenny.scott/blog/2007/08/20/messaging-system-queue-properties-after-xi-30-sp19-xi-70sp11
    Regards,
    Caio Cagnani

  • Messages getting stuck in SMQR when ABAP proxy is triggered.

    Hi Gurus,
    I have written an ABAP client proxy in my CRM system.
    When the proxy was triggered in CRM sxmb_moni data was in green flag state
    I used transaction smqr in CRM and then refresh the blocked queues.
    In CRM sxmb_moni data was in successful state again.
    Is there any way to reprocess the data which is stuck in SMQR automatically.
    I have already scheduled the JOBs RSQIWKEX and RSXMB_RESTART_MESSAGES in the CRM system still facing the issue when the proxy is triggered.I can see the messages stuck in SMQR.
    Any help will be highly appreciated.
    Regards,
    Amitanshu

    Hi,
    In CRM system
    goto SMQ1 & SMQ2 Clear(Delete) all the strucked Queues.
    Goto SMQR and say Delete all the Queueus
    Goto SXMB_ADM-Manage Queueus-Just Say Register
    Now trigger and check
    Regards
    Seshagiri

Maybe you are looking for

  • Thinkpad T530 Integrated Camera no longer works

    Hi, I bought my ThinkPad T530 laptop in August of this year and about a month ago I used the Lenovo ThinkVantage updater and it updated the driver for my web cam. Ever since then it has stopped working. Whenever I open the web conferencing menu, it o

  • Ms excel how to transfer customised toolbars

    I customise intensively lots of shortcuts, rules, scripts etc on my computer. Starting on a new computer is complicated then, because transfer to new computers and versions is not always easy or even possible. In older ms excel (office) versions, the

  • Aperture Does Not Import Videos using IMPORT FOLDER AS PROJECTS

    SOLVED - Aperture 3.2.1 does not import videos using "Import Folder as Project" After 2 days of trying to figure this out (actually around 2 hours total) I've finally managed to import all my photos & videos last year. 200 Gigs 54,000 files. First fe

  • Restrict OM Infotype start date as 12/31/9999

    Hello Experts, I want to restrict OM infotype start date on entering start date as 12/31/9999. One of the OM infotype is accepting and saving that record when entered start date as 12/31/9999. Please let me know how to restrict doing that. Thank you.

  • Broadcast/SD Titles and Text: Workflow

    I'm curious what, when doing Broadcast Titles and Text, is your workflow. Do you exclusively make slates in Illustrator etc.? Do they look significantly better and function better for Broadcast product than making same in LIveType or Motion. Is there