Message Got Struck in Queue ----Repeatedly happening

Hi Frnds,
I am working on one scenarios File to IDOC, when i am sending messages to IDOC some messages got struck in Queue, when i am resending the messages manually then its processing.
why thi issues happends repeatedly, how to avoind this issue.
Regards,
Raj

Hi
Call the Integration Server and call transaction SMQR in the sender and receiver Integration Engine in the corresponding system client.
Check the status of the scheduler and the status of the XBQ* and XBT* queues:
u25CF     Inbound qQueues
XBTI* (ExactlyOnce)
XBQI* (ExactlyOnceInOrder)
u25CF     Outbound queues
XBTO* (ExactlyOnce)
XBQO* (ExactlyOnceInOrder)
u25CF     Acknowledgment queues
XBTB* (ExactlyOnce)
XBQB* (ExactlyOnceInOrder)
u25CF     Large message queue
XBTL* (ExactlyOnce)
If the scheduler has the status Waiting, it is waiting for free work processes. This is why delays occur when XML messages are processed.
If not all necessary queues are registered, you can search for queues with the name prefix above using transaction SMQ2. Use transaction SXMB_ADM to register the queues in this case.
Check queue configuration
For a complete analysis, make sure that the queues of the integration server are registered. To do this start the transaction for the Integration Engine administration (SXMB_ADM) and select the function manage queues.

Similar Messages

When message got struck in XI

Hi,
Can anyone explain what and all steps we should perform when a message got
struck in xi System ?
Also where to find the log ,which gives clear information regarding message
struck ?
what is the difference between the logs in J2ee engine and that of in XI engine ?
Please clarify my doubt
Cheers
Sanjeev.S

Hi Sanjeev,
when a msg is stuck in XI, then in SXMB_MONI, you can select the msg and restart it...........
you can go to SXMB_ADM to register and activate your queues so that new coming msgs are not stuck in XI.........
logs of J2EE engine show the startup and current status of your xi j2ee engine.....XI has both ABAP stack and JAVA stack...........so both engines have their own logs showing their status......
Thanks,
Rajeev Gupta

Inbound Messages are struck in Queue.-Production environment of client box.

Dear All,
We have scheduled a Job(RSQIWKEX) to process messages in Inbound Queue. we are facing probem after restarting the XI server that the messages are struck in Queue and scheduled job also not getting executed. Even manually also not able to process the messages.
Could anyone help as how to proceed or what could be the cause of this problem.
Regards,
Siva

What is the error message?

Message got struck in hold status in message monitoring.

Hi SDNers,
             I am doing Idoc to File scenario. I triggered an Idoc and it is successfully processed in XI and got struck in message monitoring with hold status.
             After repetetive attempts of restarting the message, still it is in hold status.
             Even if I tried to cancel the message, it is not cancelling as it is in hold status.
            Can anybody please help how to process the message or can anybody explain how to cancel the message from message monitoring, which is in hold status.
Regards,
Jayaram.G

Hi,
If the message that has not yet been delivered is not in error state, the problem cause is probably that the message is blocked in the QRFC queues of the Integration Engine.
Check queue status
Call the Integration Server and call transaction SMQR in the sender and receiver Integration Engine in the corresponding system client.
Check the status of the scheduler and the status of the XBQ* and XBT* queues:
u25CF     Inbound qQueues
XBTI* (ExactlyOnce)
XBQI* (ExactlyOnceInOrder)
u25CF     Outbound queues
XBTO* (ExactlyOnce)
XBQO* (ExactlyOnceInOrder)
u25CF     Acknowledgment queues
XBTB* (ExactlyOnce)
XBQB* (ExactlyOnceInOrder)
u25CF     Large message queue
XBTL* (ExactlyOnce)
If the scheduler has the status Waiting, it is waiting for free work processes. This is why delays occur when XML messages are processed.
If not all necessary queues are registered, you can search for queues with the name prefix above using transaction SMQ2. Use transaction SXMB_ADM to register the queues in this case.

BPM scenario,message struck in queue.

Hi folks,
I am doing a Simple file to file BPM scenario(NO TRANSFORMATION)...
My scenario executed properly,but in moni i receive a green flag, after i looked it in
LUW -->Display Process, I can see the steps as
Receive1--initialize-send1-UNDEFINEDWork flow completed.
I think there is a problem after send.... can u plz tell me what may be the reason.
Or Am i doing in creating a IP,..... if so can u give me a simple file to file scenario,with detailed steps

Yes i have checked everything,
Status code of IP is 0 in sxi_cache-->IP
and interfaces are assigned properly at right places......
Still the message gt struck in queue...
I have a doubt,that why The Unsefined step is coming after send1....
RECEIVE1>INITIALIZE>SEND1>UNDEFINED-STEP>COMPLETED

***Raising Alerts When the message is struck in the Queue

Hi Experts,
Is there any way of Raising Alerts When the message is struck in the Queue I want to notify the user if the message is struck in Queue(smq1,smq2).Please let me know the same.
Thanks,
Srinivasa

hi
you can trigger alert for any of the component failure.
for this u nees the ccms configuration.
than you need to configure in RZ20 and RZ21.
steps.
1. create alert category in ALRTCATDEF
2.enter long text
3. add fixed recepient.
4.go to RZ21.
5. select display overview for method
6. serch for method CCMS_Send_Alert_to_ALM.
7. copy the method and create ur own Z method.
8. open ur method.
9. under control tab select ONLY IN CENTRAL SYSTEM TRIGGERED BY CCMS AGENTS.
10. in parameter tab give ur alert cat created before.
11.under release tab select AUTO REACTION METHOD.
12. go to RZ20.
13. a list of system will be displyed select ur own xi system
14. now select the queue name for which u want to trigger alert.
15.goto property button and double click.
16. go to method tab and click on method assigment.
17. goto method radio button and assigne the method u created in RZ21.
done.....enjoy....
u can check the log in slg1 tcode
regards,
navneet

Messages got stuck in inbound adapter engine queue

Hi Experts,
My senario is File - XI -SAOP reciever and we have 8 usecases of same type. For 7 usecase, we dont have any problem. But for only one use case we have having heavy delay in processing messages.
All my messages got stuck in inbound queue of Adapter engine in to be delivered state, wait state, delivering state.
Please see the below logs and suggest some solution.
To be delivered Message log :
Time Stamp Status Description
2008-06-30 06:54:20 Success Processing child message of multi-message with message ID 8c597510-466f-11dd-92f9-000f203c93e0
2008-06-30 06:54:20 Success Using connection AFW. Trying to put the message into the receive queue.
2008-06-30 06:54:20 Success Message successfully put into the queue.
Waiting Message log :
Audit Log for Message: 4864ad2b-cabd-5891-e100-00000aa3fdb2
Time Stamp Status Description
2008-06-30 06:42:24 Success Processing child message of multi-message with message I
2008-06-30 06:42:24 Success Using connection AFW. Trying to put the message into the receive queue.
2008-06-30 06:42:24 Success Message successfully put into the queue.
2008-06-30 07:46:16 Success The message was successfully retrieved from the receive queue.
2008-06-30 07:46:16 Success The message status set to DLNG.
2008-06-30 07:46:16 Success Delivering to channel: CC_SOAP_Receiver
2008-06-30 07:46:16 Success SOAP: request message entering the adapter
2008-06-30 07:51:24 Success SOAP: call failed
2008-06-30 07:51:24 Success SOAP: sending a delivery error ack ...
2008-06-30 07:51:24 Success SOAP: sent a delivery error ack
2008-06-30 07:51:24 Error SOAP: error occured: java.net.SocketTimeoutException: Read timed out
2008-06-30 07:51:24 Error Exception caught by adapter framework: Read timed out
2008-06-30 07:51:24 Error Delivery of the message to the application using connection AFW failed, due to: Read timed out.
2008-06-30 07:51:24 Success The asynchronous message was successfully scheduled to be delivered at Mon Jun 30 07:56:24 GMT 2008.
2008-06-30 07:51:24 Success The message status set to WAIT.
Delivering Message log :
Audit Log for Message: 4864ad2d-cabd-5891-e100-00000aa3fdb2
Time Stamp Status Description
2008-06-30 06:42:24 Success Processing child message of multi-message with message ID 7481f110-466f-11dd-b8ce-000f203c93e0
2008-06-30 06:42:24 Success Using connection AFW. Trying to put the message into the receive queue.
2008-06-30 06:42:24 Success Message successfully put into the queue.
2008-06-30 07:46:24 Success The message was successfully retrieved from the receive queue.
2008-06-30 07:46:24 Success The message status set to DLNG.
2008-06-30 07:46:24 Success Delivering to channel: CC_SOAP_Receiver
2008-06-30 07:46:24 Success SOAP: request message entering the adapter
2008-06-30 07:51:24 Success SOAP: call failed
2008-06-30 07:51:24 Success SOAP: sending a delivery error ack ...
2008-06-30 07:51:24 Success SOAP: sent a delivery error ack
2008-06-30 07:51:24 Error SOAP: error occured: java.net.SocketTimeoutException: Read timed out
2008-06-30 07:51:24 Error Exception caught by adapter framework: Read timed out
2008-06-30 07:51:24 Error Delivery of the message to the application using connection AFW failed, due to: Read timed out.
2008-06-30 07:51:24 Success The asynchronous message was successfully scheduled to be delivered at Mon Jun 30 07:56:24 GMT 2008.
2008-06-30 07:51:24 Success The message status set to WAIT.
Thank you
Subbu

Dear Subramanyam,
Some message might be struck in the queue. Because of this reason furthur processing is not performed on time.
Please try to do like this:
Go to SXMB_MONI, or SXi_monitor, select QueueID in the row, which is showing green flag. In the next window belongs to queue select the queue and press unlock button on the panel.
This could possibly release the queue which is struck.
Best Regards
Praveen

I just got a new iphone 5 but cant send text message more than 1 person! I have group I just got a new iphone 5 but cant send text message more than 1 person! I have group message ON. Why this is happening? ON. Why this is happening?

I just got a new iphone 5 but cant send text message more than 1 person! I have group message ON. Why this is happening?

I'm having this EXACT same problem with my iPhone 4, and I have the same computer stats (I have a Samsung Series 7)

URGENT------Two Messages Fired Simultaneously get struck in Queue

Hi,
I am using WebLogic 8.1. In my application, I am using Message Driven Bean which listens to a Queue and when a message is found, it calls a web-service client to do further processing. There are two problems I am facing:-
1.) When there is any error from web-service, the message still keeps pending in Queue. If count gets high, the application slows down. Is there any way that if further processing fails, message gets destroyed from queue.
2.) When more than one Messages are fired simultaneously in Queue, they somehow get stuck up and no calls to web-service is made. They remain in pending state in Queue. How to do proper settings so that as many as many as 10 messages are getting handled simultaneously.
Any help will be greatly appreciated.....Can anybody tell me how to cofigure my queue / tune it for better performance.
Thanks

Check the status of your multi-thread. Sometimes it might be because of the multi-thread implementation neither JMS nor the application server.

RZ21-CCMS Alerts in case the message is struck in the Queue

Hi all,
How to Configure an alert ,if the message is struck in the SMQ1,SMQ2 an alert needs to be generated and sent to multiple users.
eg:a.xyz.com,:b.xyz.com,:c.xyz.com...
In RZ21 I see there is an Option to send alert to only One receipent.How to Send the same to multiple receipents.
Thanks,
Srinivasa

hi potharaju,
the following blog shows the solution for the stuck EOIO messages-
How to deal with stuck EOIO messages in the XI 3.0 Adapter Framework
regards,
alpa.

All Text Messages got deleted from my Nokia 5800 X...

My phone got struck and the touch was not responding. Tried to switch it off, but the lock key and the power button(switch on/off button on top of the phone) were also not working.
As I was not able to do anything, I removed the battery and then replaced it. After the battery is in place, I switched the phone on.
It was more of a shock for me..!!
When I opened Messaging..no messages were present in my Inbox, Sent, Drafts and My Folders.
I used to store the messages on my Memory Card. So I quickly checked other data on the memory card like the music files. All of them were fine and even the music files am able to play.
I called up Nokia Care Technical Wing, but they are of no use. They talk like any network customer care people rather than technical experts.
I was completely disappointed with this **bleep** from Nokia.
I now changed the default saving memory of messages to Phone Memory but not sure if this works or not.
I was an avid fan of Nokia and purchased the phone a month ago with v40.0.005
I guess someone has already faced the problem, but no solution. If anyone has any inputs please provide.
I have lost my messages rather memories by using this device. Please suggest the solution if I can get back those lost messages.
@NOKIA: Some one has faced this problem while he was using V21.0.025.
Refer this thread: /t5/Messaging-Email-and-Browsing/Nokia-5800-deleted-all-messages-after-dead-battery-HELP/td-p/588279
But still donno why you people havent came up with probable cause and its solution..!!

Its difficult to look for a solution when the problem seems to be completely random and almost unrepeatable. Happened to me once on v20 and I cant find out how to repeat it. The best "solution" I could come up with was to set my phone to back itself up every day automatically, and sync my messages to Ovi Suite every morning and evening.
If you find my post helpful please click the green star on the left under the avatar. Thanks.

Unable to send message in Service bus queue through Webrole which are connected to Azure VPN

I have created two Azure VPN and two cloud services(deployed webrole) and one service bus queue
First Azure VPN and cloud service(deployed webrole) is created in same affinity group.
Second Azure VPN and cloud service is created in West US
Service bus queue is also created in West US.
When I send message in service bus queue from first cloud service (same affinity group) then message sends successfuly
but when I send message in same service bus queue from second service(West US- Webrole) then unable to send message and not throwing any exception.
I don't know, whats happening?
Its very urgent..... client is waiting.
Please help me... Thanks.
hema

Thanks for reply. Got the cause but still looking for solution.
Actually we have created Azure VPN using Express route and
all are configured for Private Peering.
Try to access service bus queue from Web role which is attached to Express route network.
I am unable to access service bus queue and send message...because cloud services deployed in virtual networks are supported over the private peering path.
There are 3 types: public, private and default route (forced tunneling).
How can be configured for all 3 which will force all traffic through the tunnel except for Azure public service?
Do you have any idea on this scenario?
Thanks.
hema

Error: 28005, Severity: 16, State: 2...An exception occurred while enqueueing a message in the target queue. Error: 15517, State: 1. Cannot execute as the database principal because the principal "dbo" does not exist, this type of principal cannot be impe

I've seen some similar questions, but want to make sure I can get an answer quickly and how to fix.
Thanks,
Paul
spid24s Error: 28005, Severity: 16, State: 2
spid24s An exception occurred while enqueueing a message in the target queue. Error: 15517, State: 1. Cannot execute as the database principal because the principal "dbo" does not exist, this type of principal cannot be impersonated,
or you do not have permission.

Hi Paul,
I also had the same error on one of my servers, and it was because the user that created the database no longer worked for the company.
So when his AD account got deleted, the database had NULL as owner
Using the following query I asked for the owners of the databases:
select name, suser_sname(sid) from master.dbo.sysdatabases
So changing the owner of the databases that had a NULL owner solved the issue for me.
use <databasesname>
go
exec sp_changedbowner 'sa'
Thanks for triggering the solution.
Peter

JMS Messages getting stuck in queues

Hi,
I am facing this peculiar issue with queue messages not getting picked up.
Application Architecture: There is 1 JMS queue ( which resides in WLDomain1 with in a Unix Box) and there are 2 windows boxes having 2 weblogic domains each with 3 instances of MDB deployed on each of the domains. So total of 12 consumers (2 Box * 2 Domain * 3 Instances of MDB) listens to the JMS queue.
Issue: After bringing everything up I am able to see 12 consumer count listening to the queue. But when I run the application which writes total of 13 messages in the queue only 7 of them are getting processed and 6 messages are always getting stuck in the queues. Interestingly this 7 messages are mostly getting processed by consumers with in the same windows box. And the selection of windows box is completely random. To confirm whether both the windows boxes are configured fine I tried to test them individually and it works fine individually, the problem happens only if I bring up both the boxes together.
Another observation is, if I bring down the non working domains, the pending messages start getting processed by the working domains. It gives an impression that the non working domains seem to lock the messages for processing but doesn't actually process it. Only when I bring down the domains it releases this lock.
Below is the JMS Life cycle events I captured from log files :
1. Start domain1 in WIN Box1
####<Nov 24, 2009 7:54:00 PM CST> <> <> <1259114040304> <783400> <> <> <JMSModule!Queue> <ConsumerCreate> <<anonymous>> <MC:CA(/<IP_BOX1>):OAMI(server.jms.connection59.session60.consumer62)> <> <>
####<Nov 24, 2009 7:54:00 PM CST> <> <> <1259114040309> <239900> <> <> <JMSModule!Queue> <ConsumerCreate> <<anonymous>> <MC:CA(/<IP_BOX1>):OAMI(server.jms.connection59.session63.consumer65)> <> <>
####<Nov 24, 2009 7:54:00 PM CST> <> <> <1259114040313> <2100> <> <> <JMSModule!Queue> <ConsumerCreate> <<anonymous>> <MC:CA(/<IP_BOX1>):OAMI(server.jms.connection59.session66.consumer68)> <> <>
2. Start domain2 in WIN Box 1
####<Nov 24, 2009 7:54:55 PM CST> <> <> <1259114095403> <38600> <> <> <JMSModule!Queue> <ConsumerCreate> <<anonymous>> <MC:CA(/<IP_BOX1>):OAMI(server.jms.connection69.session70.consumer72)> <> <>
####<Nov 24, 2009 7:54:55 PM CST> <> <> <1259114095407> <335400> <> <> <JMSModule!Queue> <ConsumerCreate> <<anonymous>> <MC:CA(/<IP_BOX1>):OAMI(server.jms.connection69.session73.consumer75)> <> <>
####<Nov 24, 2009 7:54:55 PM CST> <> <> <1259114095410> <997700> <> <> <JMSModule!Queue> <ConsumerCreate> <<anonymous>> <MC:CA(/<IP_BOX1>):OAMI(server.jms.connection69.session76.consumer78)> <> <>
3. Start domain1 in WIN Box 2
####<Nov 24, 2009 7:56:12 PM CST> <> <> <1259114172061> <316500> <> <> <JMSModule!Queue> <ConsumerCreate> <<anonymous>> <MC:CA(/<IP_BOX2>):OAMI(server.jms.connection79.session80.consumer82)> <> <>
####<Nov 24, 2009 7:56:12 PM CST> <> <> <1259114172066> <324300> <> <> <JMSModule!Queue> <ConsumerCreate> <<anonymous>> <MC:CA(/<IP_BOX2>):OAMI(server.jms.connection79.session83.consumer85)> <> <>
####<Nov 24, 2009 7:56:12 PM CST> <> <> <1259114172072> <757000> <> <> <JMSModule!Queue> <ConsumerCreate> <<anonymous>> <MC:CA(/<IP_BOX2>):OAMI(server.jms.connection79.session86.consumer88)> <> <>
4. Start domain2 in WIN Box 2
####<Nov 24, 2009 7:56:54 PM CST> <> <> <1259114214000> <142800> <> <> <JMSModule!Queue> <ConsumerCreate> <<anonymous>> <MC:CA(/<IP_BOX2>):OAMI(server.jms.connection89.session90.consumer92)> <> <>
####<Nov 24, 2009 7:56:54 PM CST> <> <> <1259114214005> <38200> <> <> <JMSModule!Queue> <ConsumerCreate> <<anonymous>> <MC:CA(/<IP_BOX2>):OAMI(server.jms.connection89.session93.consumer95)> <> <>
####<Nov 24, 2009 7:56:54 PM CST> <> <> <1259114214009> <22400> <> <> <JMSModule!Queue> <ConsumerCreate> <<anonymous>> <MC:CA(/<IP_BOX2>):OAMI(server.jms.connection89.session96.consumer98)> <> <>
At this point console shows 12 consumers listening the queue which is absolutely fine.
5. Run application
--Message Production
This produces 13 messages ( I have not pasted the complete log)
-- Message Consumption ( Only 7 messages are consumed)
####<Nov 24, 2009 8:00:05 PM CST> <> <> <1259114405953> <576400> <ID:<1047832.1259114392542.0>> <> <JMSModule!Queue> <Consumed> <<anonymous>> <MC:CA(/<IP_BOX1>):OAMI(server.jms.connection59.session63.consumer65)> <<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<mes:WLJMSMessage xmlns:mes="http://www.bea.com/WLS/JMS/Message"><mes:Header><mes:JMSTimestamp>1259114392542</mes:JMSTimestamp><mes:Properties/></mes:Header></mes:WLJMSMessage>> <>
####<Nov 24, 2009 8:00:10 PM CST> <> <> <1259114410091> <310100> <ID:<1047832.1259114393181.0>> <> <JMSModule!Queue> <Consumed> <<anonymous>> <MC:CA(/<IP_BOX1>):OAMI(server.jms.connection59.session66.consumer68)> <<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<mes:WLJMSMessage xmlns:mes="http://www.bea.com/WLS/JMS/Message"><mes:Header><mes:JMSTimestamp>1259114393181</mes:JMSTimestamp><mes:Properties/></mes:Header></mes:WLJMSMessage>> <>
####<Nov 24, 2009 8:00:10 PM CST> <> <> <1259114410130> <364600> <ID:<1047832.1259114400626.0>> <> <JMSModule!Queue> <Consumed> <<anonymous>> <MC:CA(/<IP_BOX1>):OAMI(server.jms.connection59.session63.consumer65)> <<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<mes:WLJMSMessage xmlns:mes="http://www.bea.com/WLS/JMS/Message"><mes:Header><mes:JMSTimestamp>1259114400626</mes:JMSTimestamp><mes:Properties/></mes:Header></mes:WLJMSMessage>> <>
####<Nov 24, 2009 8:00:10 PM CST> <> <> <1259114410134> <540700> <ID:<1047832.1259114393125.0>> <> <JMSModule!Queue> <Consumed> <<anonymous>> <MC:CA(/<IP_BOX1>):OAMI(server.jms.connection69.session76.consumer78)> <<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<mes:WLJMSMessage xmlns:mes="http://www.bea.com/WLS/JMS/Message"><mes:Header><mes:JMSTimestamp>1259114393125</mes:JMSTimestamp><mes:Properties/></mes:Header></mes:WLJMSMessage>> <>
####<Nov 24, 2009 8:00:10 PM CST> <> <> <1259114410137> <632400> <ID:<1047832.1259114393128.0>> <> <JMSModule!Queue> <Consumed> <<anonymous>> <MC:CA(/<IP_BOX1>):OAMI(server.jms.connection69.session73.consumer75)> <<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<mes:WLJMSMessage xmlns:mes="http://www.bea.com/WLS/JMS/Message"><mes:Header><mes:JMSTimestamp>1259114393128</mes:JMSTimestamp><mes:Properties/></mes:Header></mes:WLJMSMessage>> <>
####<Nov 24, 2009 8:00:12 PM CST> <> <> <1259114412026> <984200> <ID:<1047832.1259114393123.0>> <> <JMSModule!Queue> <Consumed> <<anonymous>> <MC:CA(/<IP_BOX1>):OAMI(server.jms.connection59.session60.consumer62)> <<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<mes:WLJMSMessage xmlns:mes="http://www.bea.com/WLS/JMS/Message"><mes:Header><mes:JMSTimestamp>1259114393123</mes:JMSTimestamp><mes:Properties/></mes:Header></mes:WLJMSMessage>> <>
####<Nov 24, 2009 8:00:16 PM CST> <> <> <1259114416045> <41800> <ID:<1047832.1259114400005.0>> <> <JMSModule!Queue> <Consumed> <<anonymous>> <MC:CA(/<IP_BOX1>):OAMI(server.jms.connection69.session70.consumer72)> <<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<mes:WLJMSMessage xmlns:mes="http://www.bea.com/WLS/JMS/Message"><mes:Header><mes:JMSTimestamp>1259114400005</mes:JMSTimestamp><mes:Properties/></mes:Header></mes:WLJMSMessage>> <>
6. At this point Admin Consol shows 6 messages pending in the queue
and From consumer numbers it is evident that consumers in WIN Box2 domains have not processed any messages
Now if I stop server in WIN Box2 Domain1, WIN Box1 picks up the messages instantely
####<Nov 24, 2009 8:13:22 PM CST> <> <> <1259115202343> <897600> <> <> <JMSModule!Queue> <ConsumerDestroy> <<anonymous>> <MC:CA(/<IP_BOX2>):OAMI(server.jms.connection79.session80.consumer82)> <> <>
####<Nov 24, 2009 8:13:22 PM CST> <> <> <1259115202346> <421900> <> <> <JMSModule!Queue> <ConsumerDestroy> <<anonymous>> <MC:CA(/<IP_BOX2>):OAMI(server.jms.connection79.session83.consumer85)> <> <>
####<Nov 24, 2009 8:13:22 PM CST> <> <> <1259115202379> <582300> <> <> <JMSModule!Queue> <ConsumerDestroy> <<anonymous>> <MC:CA(/<IP_BOX2>):OAMI(server.jms.connection79.session86.consumer88)> <> <>
####<Nov 24, 2009 8:13:24 PM CST> <> <> <1259115204888> <4600> <ID:<1047832.1259114400029.0>> <> <JMSModule!Queue> <Consumed> <<anonymous>> <MC:CA(/<IP_BOX1>):OAMI(server.jms.connection69.session76.consumer78)> <<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<mes:WLJMSMessage xmlns:mes="http://www.bea.com/WLS/JMS/Message"><mes:Header><mes:JMSTimestamp>1259114400029</mes:JMSTimestamp><mes:Properties/></mes:Header></mes:WLJMSMessage>> <>
####<Nov 24, 2009 8:13:32 PM CST> <> <> <1259115212820> <256700> <ID:<1047832.1259114400258.0>> <> <JMSModule!Queue> <Consumed> <<anonymous>> <MC:CA(/<IP_BOX1>):OAMI(server.jms.connection59.session66.consumer68)> <<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<mes:WLJMSMessage xmlns:mes="http://www.bea.com/WLS/JMS/Message"><mes:Header><mes:JMSTimestamp>1259114400258</mes:JMSTimestamp><mes:Properties/></mes:Header></mes:WLJMSMessage>> <>
####<Nov 24, 2009 8:13:43 PM CST> <> <> <1259115223579> <280600> <ID:<1047832.1259114400032.0>> <> <JMSModule!Queue> <Consumed> <<anonymous>> <MC:CA(/<IP_BOX1>):OAMI(server.jms.connection59.session60.consumer62)> <<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<mes:WLJMSMessage xmlns:mes="http://www.bea.com/WLS/JMS/Message"><mes:Header><mes:JMSTimestamp>1259114400032</mes:JMSTimestamp><mes:Properties/></mes:Header></mes:WLJMSMessage>> <>
7. At this poing Admin Consol shows 3 messages pending in the queue
Now if I stop server in WIN Box2 Domain2, the remaining 3 gets processed
####<Nov 24, 2009 8:16:08 PM CST> <> <> <1259115368998> <193400> <> <> <JMSModule!Queue> <ConsumerDestroy> <<anonymous>> <MC:CA(/<IP_BOX2>):OAMI(server.jms.connection89.session90.consumer92)> <> <>
####<Nov 24, 2009 8:16:08 PM CST> <> <> <1259115369000> <885500> <> <> <JMSModule!Queue> <ConsumerDestroy> <<anonymous>> <MC:CA(/<IP_BOX2>):OAMI(server.jms.connection89.session93.consumer95)> <> <>
####<Nov 24, 2009 8:16:09 PM CST> <> <> <1259115369002> <902500> <> <> <JMSModule!Queue> <ConsumerDestroy> <<anonymous>> <MC:CA(/<IP_BOX2>):OAMI(server.jms.connection89.session96.consumer98)> <> <>
####<Nov 24, 2009 8:16:25 PM CST> <> <> <1259115385151> <123700> <ID:<1047832.1259114400324.0>> <> <JMSModule!Queue> <Consumed> <<anonymous>> <MC:CA(/<IP_BOX1>):OAMI(server.jms.connection69.session70.consumer72)> <<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<mes:WLJMSMessage xmlns:mes="http://www.bea.com/WLS/JMS/Message"><mes:Header><mes:JMSTimestamp>1259114400324</mes:JMSTimestamp><mes:Properties/></mes:Header></mes:WLJMSMessage>> <>
####<Nov 24, 2009 8:16:29 PM CST> <> <> <1259115389660> <836600> <ID:<1047832.1259114400535.0>> <> <JMSModule!Queue> <Consumed> <<anonymous>> <MC:CA(/<IP_BOX1>):OAMI(server.jms.connection59.session63.consumer65)> <<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<mes:WLJMSMessage xmlns:mes="http://www.bea.com/WLS/JMS/Message"><mes:Header><mes:JMSTimestamp>1259114400535</mes:JMSTimestamp><mes:Properties/></mes:Header></mes:WLJMSMessage>> <>
####<Nov 24, 2009 8:16:37 PM CST> <> <> <1259115397823> <610200> <ID:<1047832.1259114400432.0>> <> <JMSModule!Queue> <Consumed> <<anonymous>> <MC:CA(/<IP_BOX1>):OAMI(server.jms.connection69.session73.consumer75)> <<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<mes:WLJMSMessage xmlns:mes="http://www.bea.com/WLS/JMS/Message"><mes:Header><mes:JMSTimestamp>1259114400432</mes:JMSTimestamp><mes:Properties/></mes:Header></mes:WLJMSMessage>> <>
Kindly throw some light on this issue. Also do let me know if you need any more specific details about this.
Thanks,
Abhijeet
Edited by: user5240164 on Nov 25, 2009 11:35 AM
Edited by: user5240164 on Nov 28, 2009 1:21 PM

Hi,
The problem may be conflicting names in your configuration. To ensure proper operation of WL Security, JMS, JTA, and JDBC, make sure that (A) each domain has a unique name, and (B) no two WebLogic servers have the same name (even if in two different domains).
To ensure a more even distribution of messages, either simply send more than a token amount messages (eg, a hundred or so, rather than just 12), or configure a custom connection factory on the domain that hosts the queue, reduce MessagesMaximum on the connection factory to 1, and then modify each MDB to refer to the custom connection factory. The MessagesMaximum setting controls the number of messages that can be pre-pushed (pipelined) to a single asynchronous consumer.
For more information see "Best Practices for JMS Beginners and Advanced Users" in the latest versions of the JMS admin guide, and "JMS Performance & Tuning Check List" in the WebLogic Performance and Tuning guide.
Tom

Messages got stuck in Adapter engine

We are doing http to RFC sysnchronous scenario
Message got stuck in adapter engine.so we are getting 500 HTTP timeout error in Http client.
Please help us to find why messages got stuck in Adapter engine.
Below Adapter engine audit log message is pasted for your reference.
Audit Log message:
Time Stamp Status Description
26.09.2008 06:33:54 Success Message successfully received by messaging system. Profile: XI URL: http://devsap01:51000/MessagingSystem/receive/AFW/XI Credential (User): PIISUSER
26.09.2008 06:33:54 Success Using connection RFC_http://sap.com/xi/XI/System. Trying to put the message into the request queue.
26.09.2008 06:33:54 Success Message successfully put into the queue.
26.09.2008 06:33:54 Success The message was successfully retrieved from the request queue.
26.09.2008 06:33:54 Success The message status set to DLNG.
26.09.2008 06:33:54 Success Delivering to channel: RFC_out_Test
26.09.2008 06:33:54 Success MP: entering
26.09.2008 06:33:54 Success MP: processing local module localejbs/RfcAFBean
26.09.2008 06:33:54 Success RFC adapter received a synchronous message. Attempting to send sRFC for ZFTestRFC
26.09.2008 06:33:54 Success RFC adapter received a synchronous message. Attempting to send sRFC for J2EE_GUEST
ime Stamp Status Description
26.09.2008 06:56:15 Success MP: leaving
26.09.2008 06:56:15 Error Delivery of the message to the application using connection RFC_http://sap.com/xi/XI/System failed, due to: com.sap.aii.af.ra.ms.api.MessageExpiredException: Sync application request expired.. Setting message to status failed.
26.09.2008 06:56:15 Error The message status set to FAIL.
26.09.2008 06:56:15 Error Returning synchronous error message to calling application: com.sap.aii.af.ra.ms.api.MessageExpiredException: Sync application request expired..
Kindly advise us on this issue.

Hi krish,
when i send a http request it got stuck in adapter engine with status "delivering" for some time....
We found that RFC got successfully executed in R/3 system but the synchronous message is not delivered to PI.since adapter engine message is having status "delivering"
after some time we got adapter engine message status as "cancelled with error"
Error is Message expired exception which you can see audit log message I have pasted in my previous post.
Meanwhile we also got HTTP timeout error in Http client.
Could you please tell me why it got stuck in Adapter engine with status "delivering" since RFC is executed successfully.
Why we are not getting synchronous message reply back to PI?

Message Got Struck in Queue ----Repeatedly happening

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for