Message Mapping validates against DTD

Hello,
We use XI message mappings to transform xml messages from 1 format to another. Now the xml that we receive from our trade partner has a reference tot a DTD. Eg.
<!DOCTYPE cXML SYSTEM "cXML_NO_ATTR.dtd">
Now when use eg. the mapping test tool, then we get an error that he doesn't find the DTD.
java.io.IOException: Failed to load resource from the context classloader of the current thread! Loading from classloader was caused by: java.io.FileNotFoundException: C:\usr\sap\X01\DVEBMGS01\j2ee\cluster\server0\cXML_NO_ATTR.dtd (The system cannot find the file specified)
For the moment we copied the DTD to the above mentionned path and now it seems to work.
But does someone now how we can turn off this validation?
(Or specify which DTD ourselves?)
Greetings,
Bart

Hi Bart,
You can try removing the tag <!DOCTYPE cXML SYSTEM "cXML_NO_ATTR.dtd">
using a Java class, which will be at #1 in the sequence of your mappings. Then comes your message mapping
This way you can manipulate the msg.
Check my msgs (& other msgs) in this link
/message/549856#549856 [original link is broken]
Regards
Vishnu

Similar Messages

ERROR: "info.plist does not validate against DTD"

Hi! I got this error if anyone has it solved Please HELP.
I am trying to package a WRT widget using Nokia WRT extension for Adobe Dreamweaver. This is the place for info on the extension: http://www.forum.nokia.com/Tools_Docs_and_Code/Tools/Runtimes/Web_Runtime/
I figure developer from here who use DW to develop mobile content might know the error.
When come to the step of 'Package Nokia WRT Widget' I got this error: info.plist does not validate against DTD
and a page of error info shown like this:
DTD validated at: Wed Jun 17 2009 19:03:00 GMT+0800 (Malay Peninsula Standard Time)
DTD used for validation: http://www.nokia.com/DTDs/plist-1.0.dtd
Line
Column
Message
Explanation
Source
2
95
DTD did not contain element declaration for document type name
3
16
Attribute "version" exists, but can not be used for this element.
3
21
element "plist" undefined. Did you mean "applet" or "strike"?
4
7
element "dict" undefined. Did you mean "strike" or "input"?
5
7
element "key" undefined. Did you mean "strike" or "blockquote"?
6
10
element "string" undefined. Did you mean "strong" or "strike"?
7
7
element "key" undefined. Did you mean "strike" or "blockquote"?
8
10
element "string" undefined. Did you mean "strong" or "strike"?
9
7
element "key" undefined. Did you mean "strike" or "blockquote"?
10
10
element "string" undefined. Did you mean "strong" or "strike"?
11
7
element "key" undefined. Did you mean "strike" or "blockquote"?
12
10
element "string" undefined. Did you mean "strong" or "strike"?
13
7
element "key" undefined. Did you mean "strike" or "blockquote"?
14
9
element "true" undefined. Did you mean "textarea" or "tr"?
Can anyone knows what this means and how i can solve it?
Please help. Thankyou.
note: I am new here and knows that keep asking quesion without giving back is not good but I have a deadline here and wanted to finish the job. I will read some other post and try to help in return when I am able to do so.

Hi pziecina,
Thanks for your reply,
I suspect my problem is the installation or setup of my system or software. as the result i tested is not by doing any scripting at all. All I did is following one of their example exactly (http://www.forum.nokia.com/Tools_Docs_and_Code/Tools/Runtimes/Web_Runtime/Dreamweaver_Exte nsion/QuickStart.xhtml) and package strightaway without modifying the code. because I want to make sure i got the extension install correctly. even so by packaging one of their ready make example already yield this error.

Message Mapping - Turn Off dtd validation

Hi,
I would like to know how to turn off dtd validation in a message map.
The source message type is based on dtd. When testing, I get the following error
java.io.IOException: Failed to load resource from the context classloader of the current thread! Loading from classloader was caused by: java.io.FileNotFoundException: D:\usr\sap\XYZ\DVEBMGS01\j2ee\cluster\server0\abc.dtd (The system cannot find the file specified)
I understand that the map requires the dtd to be present in the application folder. But, can I change some setting not to look up this file.
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE MessageContainer SYSTEM "abc.dtd">

Sorry Arvind. Not able to understand your question.
The problem we are facing is, when the input xml file contains DocType declaration with reference to a dtd, we get an error stating the dtd is not found in the j2ee application folder.
It works fine if the dtd is saved in the location. Also, it works fine if the DocType declaration is removed from the xml file. However, we are exploring an option where declaration is used but dtd is not available.
Is there any way to achieve this?
Thanks!

Ignoring a DTD validation at message mapping

Hi,
I'm facing the following situation: as a responce for a HTTP service consume, we are getting this payload:
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<!DOCTYPE ChannelAdminResult SYSTEM "/AdapterFramework/channelAdmin/ChannelAdmin.dtd">
<More tags....>
the problem is that the message mapping is not able to get the dtd that validates the payload. I did try uploading the dtd file as external definition, but it still not working.
Is there anyway to bypass the !DOCTYPE validation?
Thanks in advance,
Ariel

Hello, I have the same problem. If you have an solution for it, please post it here anyway.
In my case, the external reference is an http-adress. The server has an connection to it, but it doesn't work until now.
I tested the way over the external definition, too, but with the same effect.

How to validate a date in message mapping

Hi experts,
how to validate a date in message mapping. For ex: if date comes as 2008/02/31, then file it shold not get processed.how to achieve this in message mapping. Please help .
Thanks&Regards,
Reyaz Hussain

Hi,
There are few simple ways for date validation as follow,
1.If you would like to handle it in XI only, then in message mapping you could verify about it with the help of generating smart exception.
For e.g in mapping there is one Date conversion API i.e. somthing DateTransformation It converts the incoming date format to required format. Here give the date format i.e expected from Sender File.
If in case the format miss-matched then it will create the exception.
You could handle this exception with the use of [Alert notification|http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw04/helpdata/en/2c/abb2e7ff6311d194c000a0c93033f7/frameset.htm] and could be even able to notify to sender system about it.
2. The another solution is easy for SAP synchornous communication --If you are passing the file data to SAP, then you could use below function modules to verify date format in receiver RFC/BAPI or inbound IDOC program. If the sy-subrc is not 0 then don't process further.
CONVERT_DATE_FORMAT
ISU_DATE_FORMAT_CHECK
Thanks
Swarup

Plants are needed to validate against company in Component Tab - IW31

Hi Experts ,
Module PM , T Code IW31 ,
Plants are needed to validate against company in Component Tab and need to populate error message in status bar . Thereafter user possible to correct whatever the error and save it .
Can you please help me to solve this issue.
Component Data is populated in Data grid (Data Table). These user exits are not fired within a loop( Not repeating with line of components).
Is there way to read whole table ?
Already i tried BADI -IW O1_ORDER_BADI and
exit -
PRM0003 User field: Maintenance plan
WO10001 Create a PM sub-order
WO10002 PM maintenance order: Customer check for order release
WO10004 Maintenance order: Customer check for order completion
WO10005 Maintenance order: Cust.-specif. determination of profit ctr
WO10006 Maint. order: Fcode exclusion through cust. enhancement
WO10007 Maint.order: Customer enhancement - permits in the order
WO10008 Cust. enhancement: Determination of tax jurisdiction code
WO10009 PM Order: Customer Check for 'Save' Event
WO10010 Maint. order: Cust. enhancement for determining WBS element
WO10012 Maintenance order: Priority handling on central header
WO10015 Maintenance order: F4 Help for user fields on operation
WO10016 PM Order: Cust. enhancement to check operation user fields
WO10017 Determine external order number by customer logic
WO10018 Maintenance order: User fields on order header
WO10020 Maintenance order: Automatically include task list
WO10021 Automatic task list transfer when creating order from notif.
WO10022 Determine calendar from user exit
WO10025 PM/SM order: Finding responsible cost center
WO10026 User check on setting status 'Do not perform'
WO10031 Hide personnel number in PM/SM order
WO20001 PM order: User exit to pass routing to order
EXIT_SAPLCOMK_004 (Enhancement - CNEX0013)
COZF0002
COZF0001
Thanks,
Rehan

Hi,
I am not completely clear with ur question, i think system will give message if component is selected from other company code, but if ur looking for something specfic ..check the below
CNEX0037 : Check a newly assigned component.
CNEX0038: Check a changed component.
regards
pushpa

Error in message mapping - Cannot produce target element

As one step in my integration process, I am builing a very simple file to BPM integration (inbound MI async, outbound MI abstract).
The source type and the target type are completely equal - I am only doing some modifications to some of the content.
The type for both messages - source & target message - is an imported external definition (DTD), and hence no DT or MT are created.
As a first step I am trying to fill the target message with the content from the source message (without any modifications to the content). However, when testing this in the message mapping area, I get an error message already when filling the first element, the 'root node'.
The error message is as follows:
Start of test
Compilation of <MM name> successful
Cannot produce target element <elementname>. Check xml instance is valid for source xsd and target-field mapping fulfills requirements of target xsd Cannot produce target element <elementname>. . Check xml instance is valid for source xsd and target-field mapping fulfills requirements of target xsd
End of test
Any suggestions?
Thanks,
C

Thanks,
when creating the source message manually in the MM it worked - so nothing wrong with the mapping.
I saved this file and compared with the "original file" - containing the content which I wanted to upload, and on which the xsd (external definition) was based - and there where some inconsistancies.
I changed some values in the source XML which made it work, also when uploading the file from a drive.
So, I will go back to the source system and try to get a better XML.
Thanks for now!

Message Mapping with cXML

I have a message mapping scenario. I am trying to test something and for this I have the following Getpending Response as source and Target in message mapping.
When I try to test this in the Repository I am getting some error(listed below)
Note : I imported the below cXML into my respository in the external definition as an XSD(I used Altova XML spy to convert the XML into an XSD)
In the occurence I have given both source and target as 1.
Your assistance is greatly appreciated. Thanks lot.
Getpending Response cXML
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE cXML SYSTEM "http://xml.cxml.org/schemas/cXML/1.2.014/cXML.dtd">
<cXML timestamp="2005-01-12T16:00:18-08:00" payloadID="[email protected]">
   <Response>
      <Status code="200" text="OK"/>
      <GetPendingResponse>
         <cXML timestamp="2005-01-12T16:00:18-08:00"
               payloadID="[email protected]">
            <Header>
               <From>
                  <Credential domain="NetworkId">
                     <Identity>AN01000000001</Identity>
                  </Credential>
               </From>
               <To>
                  <Credential domain="NetworkId">
                     <Identity>AN13000000259</Identity>
                  </Credential>
               </To>
               <Sender>
                  <Credential domain="NetworkId">
                     <Identity>AN01000000001</Identity>
                  </Credential>
                  <UserAgent>ANCXMLDispatcher</UserAgent>
               </Sender>
            </Header>
            <Message>
               <DataAvailableMessage>
                  <InternalID domain="PendingMessages">3738</InternalID>
               </DataAvailableMessage>
            </Message>
         </cXML>
      </GetPendingResponse>
   </Response>
</cXML>
I am getting the following error
Start of test
Compilation of GetPendingResponse_DataREquest_MM successful
Document start
Failed to load resource from the context classloader of the current thread! Loading from classloader was caused by: java.net.ConnectException: Connection timed out (errno:238) com.sap.aii.utilxi.misc.api.BaseRuntimeException: Failed to load resource from the context classloader of the current thread! Loading from classloader was caused by: java.net.ConnectException: Connection timed out (errno:238) at com.sap.aii.mappingtool.tf3.rt.xparser.MTSaxHandler.run(MTSaxHandler.java:130) at com.sap.aii.mappingtool.tf3.rt.xparser.XParser.run(XParser.java:68) Root Cause: java.io.IOException: Failed to load resource from the context classloader of the current thread! Loading from classloader was caused by: java.net.ConnectException: Connection timed out (errno:238) at com.sap.engine.lib.xml.parser.URLLoaderBase.resolveEntity(URLLoaderBase.java:148) at com.sap.engine.lib.xml.parser.XMLParser.scanDTD(XMLParser.java:1212) at com.sap.engine.lib.xml.parser.XMLParser.scanProlog(XMLParser.java:2678) at com.sap.engine.lib.xml.parser.XMLParser.scanDocument(XMLParser.java:2713) at com.sap.engine.lib.xml.parser.XMLParser.parse0(XMLParser.java:162) at com.sap.engine.lib.xml.parser.AbstractXMLParser.parseAndCatchException(AbstractXMLParser.java:132) at com.sap.engine.lib.xml.parser.AbstractXMLParser.parse(AbstractXMLParser.java:142) at com.sap.engine.lib.xml.parser.AbstractXMLParser.parse(AbstractXMLParser.java:245) at com.sap.engine.lib.xml.parser.Parser.parseWithoutSchemaValidationProcessing(Parser.java:276) at com.sap.engine.lib.xml.parser.Parser.parse(Parser.java:338) at com.sap.engine.lib.xml.parser.SAXParser.parse(SAXParser.java:125) at javax.xml.parsers.SAXParser.parse(SAXParser.java:345) at com.sap.aii.mappingtool.tf3.rt.xparser.MTSaxHandler.run(MTSaxHandler.java:128) at com.sap.aii.mappingtool.tf3.rt.xparser.XParser.run(XParser.java:68) Failed to load resource from the context classloader of the current thread! Loading from classloader was caused by: java.net.ConnectException: Connection timed out (errno:238)
End of test

Hi Jenni,
This might help
Message Mapping - same structure
/people/shabarish.vijayakumar/blog/2006/04/03/xi-in-the-role-of-a-ftp
http://www.cxml.org/files/downloads.cfm
Thanks & Regards
Agasthuri Doss
Message was edited by: Agasthuri Doss Baladandapani

Message Mapping Issue with data without namespace

Hi,
I have a common xsd imported which has its own target namespace into my SWC namespace. Based on this xsd I have generated a Message Interface and webservice and given the wsdl to third party system for invoking my webservice.
The problem is I have done the message mapping based on xsd which has namespace but whereas the third party system which is consuming my webservice is sending the xml data without any namespace and because of which my mapping is failing (target structure is not getting generated as expected). I have tested the mapping with namespace and without namespace from IR already. I have explained this below with example.
I cannot change the xsd as it is a common and even cannot ask the end system to change the data format they are sending as they are sending the same data to some other systems also, which are not complaining.
How to resolve this issue in XI?
Actual xml data generated from my imported xsd (with namespace)
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<ns0:Root xmlns:ns0="http://employee/types">
   <ns0:EmployeeDetails>
      <ns0:EmployeeId>12</ns0:EmployeeId>
        <ns0:EmployeeName>XYZ</ns0:EmployeeName>
</ns0:EmployeeDetails>
</ns0:Root>
Actual Data coming from third party system (without namespace)
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<Root>
   <EmployeeDetails>
      <EmployeeId>12</EmployeeId>
        <EmployeeName>XYZ</EmployeeName>
</EmployeeDetails>
</Root>
Thanks
Amit

Just wild guess:)
I am not 100% sure but i guess XSLT mapping does not checks the incoming payload against the sender message type.Within XSLT mapping you can add/remove namespace as you would like,use this XSLT mapping before your actual message mapping in interface mapping.
I am saying this coz recently i was able to generate XSLT mapping(in altova Map Transform) without even specifying any sender or receiver Message type and it worked just fine.
Thanx
Aamir

How can we pick Message ID at runtime in message mapping?

Hi Experts,
I am working on a file to file Scenario.
Lets say I have a Field called SEQ_NO at target.
I want to populate it this with Message ID (MONI one) at runtime.
Is it possible? If Yes, How can we do this?

Hi,
No It is not working fine.
Inside TEST----
> Parameter Tab< I had input MESSAGE_ID Against MessageId.
After that I run It, Got the error as Below:
17:48:17 Start of test
Runtime exception during processing target field mapping /ns0:MT_BANK_CUST_DET/File_Out/Header/SEQNO. The message is: Exception:[java.lang.StringIndexOutOfBoundsException] in class com.sap.aii.mappingtool.flib3.TextFunctions method substring[, com.sap.aii.mappingtool.tf3.rt.Context@6ec66ec6] com.sap.aii.mappingtool.tf3.MessageMappingException: Runtime exception during processing target field mapping /ns0:MT_BANK_CUST_DET/File_Out/Header/SEQNO. The message is: Exception:[java.lang.StringIndexOutOfBoundsException] in class com.sap.aii.mappingtool.flib3.TextFunctions method substring[, com.sap.aii.mappingtool.tf3.rt.Context@6ec66ec6].
It is possible to get MESSAGE ID which we get in MONI for every message pass throught XI in message mapping itself?
Regards
Pradeep

Set a variable in Adapter Module and read it during message mapping

Hi guys,
is there any way, how I could set some variable and store its value during the adapter module processing and read back this value in message mapping and use it? Without using a database or files.. I mean, some j2ee storage or something like that..
Thanks for your help,
Olian

Hi guys,
thanks for your answers.. just a clarification, what the problem is.
I need to validate a message in the adapter module, if it's digital signature is valid. If it is, I need to send back to the sender a return code (message) OK, otherwise ERROR. I can't modify the message (or dynamic configuration) as I'm using a WSS in the sender channel. The system doesn't allow me to change anything in the message, so I can't find out in the mapping what the validation result was. I then tried to do the validation directly in the message mapping, but I have some issues there with libraries or what, because the validation code, which works in the adapter module, doesn't work in the mapping java class. So my final thought was maybe I could validate the message in the adapter module and pass the result to the message mapping and then create an appropriate return message (in the mapping). However, I see no way of passing a value there. I'm stuck and have no Idea how to resolve the problem. Any hints guys?
Thanks a lot for your help!
Olian

Message mapping Query

Hi,
I have (xml)file to idoc scenario where the xml xsd has following structure.Its is PO posting
batch
header
item
now in batch i have a feild total po which i need to validate with the total number of po in the file and if the two are not matching then i need to send a error xml file back to same ftp server (insted of sending it to R3 for idoc posting), so my receiver will change based on this check.
Can anyone let me know how to do this.

Yes ,
Certainly , You can do this without BPM.
There may be few other ways also , i am explaining you one out of them .
Message Mapping . Create three message Mapping .
i. ) File sender to IDOC Receiver
ii.) file sender to file receiver (with error information).
iii.)file sender to receivers ( Message type :Receivers namespace : http://sap.com/xi/XI/System) : This one will be used to choose receiver dynamicaly.
at target Message type :Receivers the element Service Populate with the value of buisness system based on your condition.
like in your case : IDoc receiver Buisness system if counts matches, else File Receiver buisness system if count doesnt matches.
Operation Mapping . Create three Operation Mapping .
i. ) File sender OUTB to IDOC Receiver INB
ii.) file sender OUTB to file receiver (with error information) INB.
iii.)file sender OUTB to ReceiverDetermination INB
( target service interface :ReceiverDetermination namespace : http://sap.com/xi/XI/System) : This one will be used to choose receiver dynamicaly.
Rest is same in ESR Side.
Now let us come to Key points in ID.
1. Receiver Determination.
It would be extended : Here choose third Type Operation mapping : iii.)file sender OUTB to ReceiverDetermination INB
this will deside, Receiver Dynamically.
2. Interface Determination.
now for each buisness system , create interface determination and choose appropriate operation mapping.
Rest steps would be same ....
Do ask if found any problem .
Regards
Dragon

External definitions import into Message mapping

Hi,
I have a DTD message in external definitions to be imported into the message mapping. But I am not able to choose the object in the mapping editor. It does not allow even if the message is a valid WSDL. The only time it allows to import into the message editor is when its an XSD.I am not sure why the external definitions in DTD or WSDL formats are not able to be imported or am I missing something??
-Ken

Hi,
A conversion of the downloaded cXML DTD into XSD by using XMLSPY yields 3 XSD files. Using the initial XSD(which has the major fields) yields the same error(i.e cannot create messages or valid WSDL) in external definitions.
I also tried using one of the standard xml's from the cXML site and the funny part was XMLSPY validated them without errors and while importing them directly into the mapping editor, XI throws an error "XML NOT WELL FORMED". Its so weird.
Also is there a possibility to write a script to manipulate the payload message after passing through the adapters? For eg : Creating a script which will delete a valid tag in payload before it reaches the 3rd party. ...By adding the DOCTYPE in the prolog, the message would look like this :
"<?xml...utf-8>
<!DOCTYPE......'Cxml.org'>
<?xml.....utf-8>
<start tag></start tag>
Therefore some kind of a script that would remove the second <?xml tag on line 3>..
This is just a round about thinking
Any ideas..

Throw message mapping exception

Hi All,
In message mapping, I am using User defined function for validating 2 fields of the input file. Through this funtion, I want to throw an message mapping exception incase the validation fails.
Can anybody let me know, how can we forcefully throw an exception using java program.
Thanks in advance,
Ashish.

Hi,
You can use something as an incoming schema to validate, see this weblog and at last screen shot you see the result of validations,
/people/jacob.vandborg/blog/2005/11/29/schema-validation-of-incoming-message
You can also see a much detailed validation document here,
https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/servlet/prt/portal/prtroot/docs/library/uuid/99593f86-0601-0010-059d-d2dd39dceaa0
i think you donot need at this level but just for understanding, (This is for incoming file validations)
Or
you may also use node functions to check if values are coming or not, like exists, and if the value do not exist send a blank space to prevent runtime mapping exceptions,
/people/sravya.talanki2/blog/2005/12/08/message-mapping-simplified-150-part-ii point 6
All this can be tried,
All the best,
Anirban.

Task.toXML() creates xml that does not validate against WorklistTask.xsd

I am using the worklist API and I am using the toXML() function provided in the Task object to serialize my Task info to XML. It produces XML that looks alot like a "task" Element. But, it does not validate against the WorkflowTask.xsd schema. What is even more odd is that XML looks different than the xml I see when I look at the data in the BPEL Console.
For example, the first XML document below is from Task.toXML. notice that it's first child element is taskId. According to the xsd, that is not valid. The second xml document in this post is from the console. it appears to be valid.
Am I doing something wrong or should I just not expect the worklist api to produce valid xml? (correction: should I not expect the worklist api to xml that validates?)
<task xmlns="http://xmlns.oracle.com/pcbpel/taskservice/task"><taskId>0D7B97F1B138EE21E04017AC2B194357</taskId><title>Payment not posted by payee</title><isGroup>true</isGroup><acquiredBy/><owner>bpeladmin</owner><conclusion/><state>ASSIGNED</state><subState>ASSIGNED</subState><processId>ResearchRequestWorkflow</processId><processName>ResearchRequestWorkflow</processName><versionNumber>1</versionNumber><notm>1</notm><taskGroupId/><taskType>http://blade-11.payveris.com:9700/orabpel/default/ResearchRequestWorkflow/1.0/taskConfigResearchRequest.xml</taskType><identificationKey>PAULA MERRILL, 2069</identificationKey><priority>3</priority><creator>bpeladmin</creator><creationDate>2006-02-23T14:53:08.000-05:00</creationDate><updatedBy>bpeladmin</updatedBy><modifyDate>2006-02-23T14:53:08.000-05:00</modifyDate><flexString1>1140724383057</flexString1><flexString2>PAULA MERRILL</flexString2><flexString3>PAULA MERRILL</flexString3><flexString4>PaymentId3489</flexString4><flexLong1>0</flexLong1><flexLong2>0</flexLong2><flexDouble1>0.0</flexDouble1><flexDouble2>0.0</flexDouble2><processVersion>1.0</processVersion><instanceId>2304</instanceId><domainId>default</domainId><approvers/><hasSubTasks>false</hasSubTasks><processOwner>bpeladmin</processOwner><pattern>SINGLE_APPROVAL</pattern><taskNumber>10240</taskNumber><systemString1/><systemString2/><systemString3/><versionReason>Task Created</versionReason><assigneeGroups>ResearchManager</assigneeGroups><payload confirmation_number="1140724383057" due_date="2006-02-22-05:00" reason="Payment not posted by payee"><requester xmlns="http://www.pp.com/schema"><first>PAULA MERRILL</first><last>PAULA MERRILL</last><tax_id/></requester><payment_type xmlns="http://www.pp.com/schema" number="">insuranceauto</payment_type><record_info xmlns="http://www.pp.com/schema"><creation app="EU" by="282950" date="2006-02-23T14:53:03.056-05:00"/><updation app="EU" by="282950" date="2006-02-23T14:53:03.056-05:00"/></record_info><payment xmlns="http://www.pp.com/schema" id="3489"><bank_info bank_id="2" funds_model="RISK"/><payment_info><confirmation_number>5428</confirmation_number><amount formattedValue="77.00" value="77"/><payment_date>2006-01-06-05:00</payment_date><check_number>5851</check_number><funded>false</funded><merged>false</merged><network id="3" status="ACTIVE" type="C">MOORE</network><alert_on_completion>false</alert_on_completion><alert_number_days_before>0</alert_number_days_before><scheduled_info id="2278"><scheduled_for_date formatted="01/06/2006">2006-01-06-05:00</scheduled_for_date><scheduled_on_date formatted="01/06/2006">2006-01-06-05:00</scheduled_on_date><created_user_id>282950</created_user_id><updated_user_id>0</updated_user_id></scheduled_info></payment_info><payee_info id="24958" relationship_id="6004"><payee_account_number>JUNIT123</payee_account_number><nick_name>blahblah</nick_name><name>complexpayeenameforatest</name><address1>123 main street</address1><address2>c/o anybody</address2><city>Dark Cityrandomizer</city><state>CT</state><zip>06512</zip><network id="3" status="ACTIVE" type="C">MOORE</network></payee_info><customer_info id="2069"><name>PAULA MERRILL</name><customer_account_id>8</customer_account_id><customer_account_number>213</customer_account_number><customer_routing_number>111111111</customer_routing_number><address1>Ernest Hemingway Drive</address1><city>Springfield</city><state>IL</state><zip>62703</zip></customer_info><state_info><failed_reason_code>0</failed_reason_code><money_batch_id>824</money_batch_id><good_funds_batch_id>1817</good_funds_batch_id><network_batch_id>958</network_batch_id><state_date>2006-10-24-05:00</state_date><state formatted="Check Cashed by Payee" id="2">Cleared</state><trace_number>211170100000003</trace_number></state_info><state_history><failed_reason_code>0</failed_reason_code><money_batch_id>0</money_batch_id><good_funds_batch_id>0</good_funds_batch_id><network_batch_id>0</network_batch_id><state_date>2006-01-06-05:00</state_date><state formatted="In Process" id="6">Created</state><record_info><creation app="BPEL" by="0" date="2006-01-06T11:14:33-05:00"/></record_info></state_history><state_history><failed_reason_code>0</failed_reason_code><money_batch_id>0</money_batch_id><good_funds_batch_id>1817</good_funds_batch_id><network_batch_id>0</network_batch_id><state_date>2006-01-06-05:00</state_date><state formatted="In Process" id="6">Created</state><trace_number>211170100000003</trace_number><record_info><creation app="BPEL" by="0" date="2006-01-06T11:14:35-05:00"/></record_info></state_history><state_history><failed_reason_code>0</failed_reason_code><money_batch_id>0</money_batch_id><good_funds_batch_id>1817</good_funds_batch_id><network_batch_id>0</network_batch_id><state_date>2006-01-06-05:00</state_date><state formatted="In Process" id="22">Waiting for Decision</state><trace_number>211170100000003</trace_number><record_info><creation app="BPEL" by="0" date="2006-01-06T11:14:36-05:00"/></record_info></state_history><state_history><failed_reason_code>0</failed_reason_code><money_batch_id>824</money_batch_id><good_funds_batch_id>1817</good_funds_batch_id><network_batch_id>0</network_batch_id><state_date>2006-01-06-05:00</state_date><state formatted="In Process" id="12">Ready for Funding</state><trace_number>211170100000003</trace_number><record_info><creation app="BPEL" by="0" date="2006-01-06T12:40:01-05:00"/></record_info></state_history><state_history><failed_reason_code>0</failed_reason_code><money_batch_id>824</money_batch_id><good_funds_batch_id>1817</good_funds_batch_id><network_batch_id>0</network_batch_id><state_date>2006-01-06-05:00</state_date><state formatted="In Process" id="9">Funded</state><trace_number>211170100000003</trace_number><record_info><creation app="BPEL" by="0" date="2006-01-06T12:40:01-05:00"/></record_info></state_history><state_history><failed_reason_code>0</failed_reason_code><money_batch_id>0</money_batch_id><good_funds_batch_id>1817</good_funds_batch_id><network_batch_id>0</network_batch_id><state_date>2006-01-06-05:00</state_date><state formatted="In Process" id="12">Ready for Funding</state><trace_number>211170100000003</trace_number><record_info><creation app="BPEL" by="0" date="2006-01-06T12:40:03-05:00"/></record_info></state_history><state_history><failed_reason_code>0</failed_reason_code><money_batch_id>824</money_batch_id><good_funds_batch_id>1817</good_funds_batch_id><network_batch_id>958</network_batch_id><state_date>2006-01-06-05:00</state_date><state formatted="In Process" id="9">Funded</state><trace_number>211170100000003</trace_number><record_info><creation app="BPEL" by="0" date="2006-01-06T12:43:56-05:00"/></record_info></state_history><state_history><failed_reason_code>0</failed_reason_code><money_batch_id>824</money_batch_id><good_funds_batch_id>1817</good_funds_batch_id><network_batch_id>958</network_batch_id><state_date>2006-01-06-05:00</state_date><state formatted="Mailed" id="11">Payment Sent</state><trace_number>211170100000003</trace_number><record_info><creation app="BPEL" by="0" date="2006-01-06T12:43:59-05:00"/></record_info></state_history><state_history><failed_reason_code>0</failed_reason_code><money_batch_id>824</money_batch_id><good_funds_batch_id>1817</good_funds_batch_id><network_batch_id>958</network_batch_id><state_date>2006-10-24-05:00</state_date><state formatted="Check Cashed by Payee" id="2">Cleared</state><trace_number>211170100000003</trace_number><record_info><creation app="EU" by="9999999" date="2006-02-03T12:38:08-05:00"/></record_info></state_history><record_info><creation app="BPEL" by="0" date="2006-01-06T11:14:33-05:00"/><updation app="EU" by="9999999" date="2006-02-03T12:38:08-05:00"/></record_info><research_request>false</research_request></payment></payload></task>
When Im look at the same task in the BPELConsole, the task looks like:
<task>
<title>Payment not posted by payee</title>
<assigneeUsers/>
<assigneeGroups>ResearchManager</assigneeGroups>
<acquiredBy/>
<owner>bpeladmin</owner>
<payload confirmation_number="1140724383057" due_date="2006-02-22-05:00" reason="Payment not posted by payee" >
<requester>
<first>PAULA MERRILL</first>
<last>PAULA MERRILL</last>
<tax_id/>
</requester>
<payment_type number="" >insuranceauto</payment_type>
<record_info>
<creation app="EU" by="282950" date="2006-02-23T14:53:03.056-05:00" />
<updation app="EU" by="282950" date="2006-02-23T14:53:03.056-05:00" />
</record_info>
<payment id="3489" >
<bank_info bank_id="2" funds_model="RISK" />
<payment_info>
<confirmation_number>5428</confirmation_number>
<amount formattedValue="77.00" value="77" />
<payment_date>2006-01-06-05:00</payment_date>
<check_number>5851</check_number>
<funded>false</funded>
<merged>false</merged>
<network id="3" status="ACTIVE" type="C" >MOORE</network>
<alert_on_completion>false</alert_on_completion>
<alert_number_days_before>0</alert_number_days_before>
<scheduled_info id="2278" >
<scheduled_for_date formatted="01/06/2006" >2006-01-06-05:00</scheduled_for_date>
<scheduled_on_date formatted="01/06/2006" >2006-01-06-05:00</scheduled_on_date>
<created_user_id>282950</created_user_id>
<updated_user_id>0</updated_user_id>
</scheduled_info>
</payment_info>
<payee_info id="24958" relationship_id="6004" >
<payee_account_number>JUNIT123</payee_account_number>
<nick_name>blahblah</nick_name>
<name>complexpayeenameforatest</name>
<address1>123 main street</address1>
<address2>c/o anybody</address2>
<city>Dark Cityrandomizer</city>
<state>CT</state>
<zip>06512</zip>
<network id="3" status="ACTIVE" type="C" >MOORE</network>
</payee_info>
<customer_info id="2069" >
<name>PAULA MERRILL</name>
<customer_account_id>8</customer_account_id>
<customer_account_number>213</customer_account_number>
<customer_routing_number>111111111</customer_routing_number>
<address1>Ernest Hemingway Drive</address1>
<city>Springfield</city>
<state>IL</state>
<zip>62703</zip>
</customer_info>
<state_info>
<failed_reason_code>0</failed_reason_code>
<money_batch_id>824</money_batch_id>
<good_funds_batch_id>1817</good_funds_batch_id>
<network_batch_id>958</network_batch_id>
<state_date>2006-10-24-05:00</state_date>
<state formatted="Check Cashed by Payee" id="2" >Cleared</state>
<trace_number>211170100000003</trace_number>
</state_info>
<state_history>
<failed_reason_code>0</failed_reason_code>
<money_batch_id>0</money_batch_id>
<good_funds_batch_id>0</good_funds_batch_id>
<network_batch_id>0</network_batch_id>
<state_date>2006-01-06-05:00</state_date>
<state formatted="In Process" id="6" >Created</state>
<record_info>
<creation app="BPEL" by="0" date="2006-01-06T11:14:33-05:00" />
</record_info>
</state_history>
<state_history>
<failed_reason_code>0</failed_reason_code>
<money_batch_id>0</money_batch_id>
<good_funds_batch_id>1817</good_funds_batch_id>
<network_batch_id>0</network_batch_id>
<state_date>2006-01-06-05:00</state_date>
<state formatted="In Process" id="6" >Created</state>
<trace_number>211170100000003</trace_number>
<record_info>
<creation app="BPEL" by="0" date="2006-01-06T11:14:35-05:00" />
</record_info>
</state_history>
<state_history>
<failed_reason_code>0</failed_reason_code>
<money_batch_id>0</money_batch_id>
<good_funds_batch_id>1817</good_funds_batch_id>
<network_batch_id>0</network_batch_id>
<state_date>2006-01-06-05:00</state_date>
<state formatted="In Process" id="22" >Waiting for Decision</state>
<trace_number>211170100000003</trace_number>
<record_info>
<creation app="BPEL" by="0" date="2006-01-06T11:14:36-05:00" />
</record_info>
</state_history>
<state_history>
<failed_reason_code>0</failed_reason_code>
<money_batch_id>824</money_batch_id>
<good_funds_batch_id>1817</good_funds_batch_id>
<network_batch_id>0</network_batch_id>
<state_date>2006-01-06-05:00</state_date>
<state formatted="In Process" id="12" >Ready for Funding</state>
<trace_number>211170100000003</trace_number>
<record_info>
<creation app="BPEL" by="0" date="2006-01-06T12:40:01-05:00" />
</record_info>
</state_history>
<state_history>
<failed_reason_code>0</failed_reason_code>
<money_batch_id>824</money_batch_id>
<good_funds_batch_id>1817</good_funds_batch_id>
<network_batch_id>0</network_batch_id>
<state_date>2006-01-06-05:00</state_date>
<state formatted="In Process" id="9" >Funded</state>
<trace_number>211170100000003</trace_number>
<record_info>
<creation app="BPEL" by="0" date="2006-01-06T12:40:01-05:00" />
</record_info>
</state_history>
<state_history>
<failed_reason_code>0</failed_reason_code>
<money_batch_id>0</money_batch_id>
<good_funds_batch_id>1817</good_funds_batch_id>
<network_batch_id>0</network_batch_id>
<state_date>2006-01-06-05:00</state_date>
<state formatted="In Process" id="12" >Ready for Funding</state>
<trace_number>211170100000003</trace_number>
<record_info>
<creation app="BPEL" by="0" date="2006-01-06T12:40:03-05:00" />
</record_info>
</state_history>
<state_history>
<failed_reason_code>0</failed_reason_code>
<money_batch_id>824</money_batch_id>
<good_funds_batch_id>1817</good_funds_batch_id>
<network_batch_id>958</network_batch_id>
<state_date>2006-01-06-05:00</state_date>
<state formatted="In Process" id="9" >Funded</state>
<trace_number>211170100000003</trace_number>
<record_info>
<creation app="BPEL" by="0" date="2006-01-06T12:43:56-05:00" />
</record_info>
</state_history>
<state_history>
<failed_reason_code>0</failed_reason_code>
<money_batch_id>824</money_batch_id>
<good_funds_batch_id>1817</good_funds_batch_id>
<network_batch_id>958</network_batch_id>
<state_date>2006-01-06-05:00</state_date>
<state formatted="Mailed" id="11" >Payment Sent</state>
<trace_number>211170100000003</trace_number>
<record_info>
<creation app="BPEL" by="0" date="2006-01-06T12:43:59-05:00" />
</record_info>
</state_history>
<state_history>
<failed_reason_code>0</failed_reason_code>
<money_batch_id>824</money_batch_id>
<good_funds_batch_id>1817</good_funds_batch_id>
<network_batch_id>958</network_batch_id>
<state_date>2006-10-24-05:00</state_date>
<state formatted="Check Cashed by Payee" id="2" >Cleared</state>
<trace_number>211170100000003</trace_number>
<record_info>
<creation app="EU" by="9999999" date="2006-02-03T12:38:08-05:00" />
</record_info>
</state_history>
<record_info>
<creation app="BPEL" by="0" date="2006-01-06T11:14:33-05:00" />
<updation app="EU" by="9999999" date="2006-02-03T12:38:08-05:00" />
</record_info>
<research_request>false</research_request>
</payment>
</payload>
<conclusion/>
<state>ASSIGNED</state>
<subState>ASSIGNED</subState>
<processId>ResearchRequestWorkflow</processId>
<processName>ResearchRequestWorkflow</processName>
<processVersion>1.0</processVersion>
<instanceId>2304</instanceId>
<domainId>default</domainId>
<processOwner>bpeladmin</processOwner>
<taskId>0D7B97F1B138EE21E04017AC2B194357</taskId>
<versionReason>Task Created</versionReason>
<taskGroupId/>
<taskType>http://blade-11.payveris.com:9700/orabpel/default/ResearchRequestWorkflow/1.0/taskConfigResearchRequest.xml</taskType>
<identificationKey>PAULA MERRILL, 2069</identificationKey>
<comments/>
<priority>3</priority>
<creator>bpeladmin</creator>
<updatedBy>bpeladmin</updatedBy>
<hasSubTasks>false</hasSubTasks>
<approvers/>
<pattern>SINGLE_APPROVAL</pattern>
<flexString1>1140724383057</flexString1>
<flexString2>PAULA MERRILL</flexString2>
<flexString3>PAULA MERRILL</flexString3>
<flexString4>PaymentId3489</flexString4>
<flexDouble1/>
<flexDouble2/>
<flexLong1/>
<flexLong2/>
<flexDate1/>
<flexDate2/>
<flexDate3/>
<attachment/>
<taskNumber>10240</taskNumber>
<creationDate>2006-02-23T14:53:08.955-05:00</creationDate>
<modifyDate>2006-02-23T14:53:08.955-05:00</modifyDate>
<isGroup>true</isGroup>
<versionNumber>1</versionNumber>
<notm>1</notm>
<expirationDate/>
<expirationDuration/>
</task>
Message was edited by:
gjacobi

I am using oracle.tip.pc.services.hw.task.impl.Task
that object has a toXML method.
To get that object, I am using the RemoteWorklistServiceClient.getWorlistTaskById method.
A word of caution. Not only am I still having the issue above (I had to hack my own WorkflowTask.xsd to make it validate) but I have noticed that the toXML() method actually returns different results when you think it would not. For example, I have something similar to the following code:
task.toXML()
task.toElement()
task.getPayload()
task.toXML()
The first and last toXML methods produce strings that do not match (it adds some empty elements to the end of the document). Weird. Very Weird.
Greg

Message Mapping validates against DTD

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for