Metatags Bindable, CollapseWhiteSpace and Inspectable

Hi,
I'm working with a TextArea and got stuck at the setter and
getter functions.
I've researched the documentation, some books and google, but
I couldn't find the answers for some questions.
1 - Is there any difference between:
[Bindable(event="change")] and [Bindable("teste")] ? Which one?
2 - When adding the event property to the BINDABLE metatag,
the binding will only occur when this event is dispached, correct?
3 - The [CollapseWhiteSpace] tag is used to remove the white
spaces of the return and parameter variables, correct?
4 - I've understood the [INSPECTABLE] concept, but couldn't
understand the real use and result of using this tag. For example:
[Inspectable(category="General")]
public function get text():String
return textArea ? textArea.text : _text;
Which would be the diferece in using or not using the
inspectable tag?
5 - As the get text() and the set text() are overloaded
methods, metatags preceeding the getter method will work also for
the setter methods (which is defined right after the getter
method)?
I know that those are pretty basic questions, but my research
fonts wheren't "for dummys", so I would be very happy if someone
would answer them.
Thanks,
Peter

Question 5 is answerd, but I'm still looking for the answers
of the other questions.
thanks,
peter

Similar Messages

Specifications and Inspection Plans

Hi,
I have few questions regarding Specs and Inspection plans.
1) What is the primary purpose of specifications(CG02 transaction)?
2) What is the use of specficications in QM and EHS modules?
3) How are specifications related to Inspection plans?
4) What is the business advantage by enabling specification data to be copied directly into Inspection plans?
Thanks in adavnce
Vishnu

The idea is that you can maintain all the specs in the EH&S module in one place. Specs are used of course to evaluate the material and make sure the material is what it is suppose to be.
The transferring however of the specs from the EH&S module to QM however leaves a lot to be desired. I don't recommend it at this time. If you attempt to do it, plan on bringing in a consulting partner or consultants. You'll probably wind up doing a lot of coding to make it work for you as there isn't much flexibility or functionality as it is currently delivered. All IMHO.
Craig

Silverlight Tool for debugging and inspecting UI created dynamically from Styles

We have a Silverlight grid. In the grid style xaml, in row header style, I am creating a custom grid column header with an arrow on the click of which it renders a list box control with columns name and check boxes to select. This
list is populated from a ColumnViewModel. The listbox on opening overlays the grid. I have to convert it to WPF grid.
In this case,How to debug and trace visual tree so that I can port the similar tree to WPF.
Any tool to inspect run time bindings value with Styles and inspect the rendered UI in Silverlight ?

Hi,
Here is a user convert silverlight to wpf successfully and wrote a blog:
http://robertsmyth.blogspot.com/2011/12/migrating-from-silverlight-to-wpf.html
Besides, below article talks about code reuse in wpf and silverlight:
https://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/magazine/cc895632.aspx
Best Regards,
We are trying to better understand customer views on social support experience, so your participation in this interview project would be greatly appreciated if you have time. Thanks for helping make community forums a great place.
Click
HERE to participate the survey.

Link between code and code groups and inspection type

Hi All,
I want to know the link between code and Code Group for UD and inspection type?
There is an option of choosing Usage selected set in SPRO "Seeting for inspection type".If i dont enter anything there,will it show all the code groups in the system while taking UD?
Pls guide

Hi Shreya,
Yes, the link between code and Code Group for UD and inspection type is specific selection of UD related to specific inspection type. Ex. there are separate UD codes individually for Goods receipt against PO, Gr against Production or for In-process inspection ets. so If you assign the selected sets at SPRO Inspection type, then while doing UD system will show UD codes related to only that inspection type.
If you don't enter anything there at SPRO, you will see all the code groups in the system while taking UD and one can get confused in selecting the relevant code.
so assigning of UD selected sets, plant wise (tick) at " Inspection types" is best practice.
Best Regards,
Shekhar

Inspect and Inspected field in Record Results:Characteristic overview

hi,
Can any one explain me the Inspect and Inspected field in Record Results:Characteristic overview screen. How the sample size is determined in Inspected field during lot creation.
Muthamil

Dear Muthamil
This fully depends on the sampling procedure you choose. for eg if you choose 100% sampling procedure and you have lot quantity of 10 items
Then inspect will be 10 and inspected will be 10.
SAP gives the definition for INSPECT as - Predefined sample size that has to be inspected for an inspection characteristic or a partial sample.
For each inspection plan characteristic you define the amount by which the inspected sample size in the 'Insp.ed' field can deviate from the to-be-inspected sample size in the 'Inspect' field. If a characteristic (partial sample ) is closed the system checks whether the required sample size is adhered to. The characteristic (partial sample) can only be closed if this is the case.
But for Scope not fixed, larger , smaller scope the inspected field chages based on the result recording
SAP gives the definition for INSPECTED as - Number of sample units that have been inspected for a characteristic or a partial sample.
Hope this explains
Regards
Gajesh

Difference between Material Specs and Inspection Plan

Hi ALL,
Whats the difference between Material Specifications and Inspection plan...?...Why Material Specification is required in QM...?
Thanks & Regards,
Ameya K.

Hi Ameya,
 The first thing is that material spec is the client level data in QM where as Inspection plan is the plant level.

Case 1: Suppose that there is an attribute Viscosity whivh needs to be checked whose UCL & LCL is 10 to 15. But in one plant where some highy precise requirement is there ...... then in that case we want that for that plant for the material viscocity should be 5 to 7 . In that case the requirement of the inspection plans comes in to picture .
Case 2 : The material got one extra attribute needs to be checked for some plant .... in that case we need to maintain inspection plan for that material with both Insp with material spec & insp with inspection plan need to be checked so that during the result recording apart from the attributes in the material spec this extra attribute gets populated from inspection plan
Note : Apart from this as in material spec the data is maintained in the client level the load in the database will be compartively less as there will not be any duplication of data which will be there in case of plant level data for the same material ..........
I hope this will add some info apart from what the gurus has suggested above .....
Please reward points if helpful.....
Thanks & Regrads
Kaushik Choudhury

Debug and Inspect variables

Hi there;
I really do not know what is happening , searching this group i only see my posts about it;
When I'm in debug mode, debugger show my variables , as they where another type / value as they are really are;
       public class controlerBean extends ambiente implements Serializable {
       public void onChangeCenario(ValueChangeEvent valueChangeEvent) {
             Row rLinhaCen = null;
             Row rLinhaOrc = null;Debugger shows rLinhaCen as it was controlerBean, and inspect it as it is a controller bean ;
I'm on a windows vista (64) box
jDev
ADF Business Components     11.1.1.55.36
Java(TM) Platform     1.6.0_14
Oracle IDE     11.1.1.2.36.55.36
Versioning Support     11.1.1.2.36.55.36
Will appreciate some help !!
Thanks
Edited by: MarcosOrtega on 08/04/2010 07:57

Thanks Albertpi;
But I'm afraid that should be some other problem, because this is not the only java source that this estrange behavior appears;
Any other tips ?

Actual lot Qty and inspection stock

Hi,
We are using early inspection for 04 inspection lot. When I release my process order the inspection lot is created. As usual, the first inspection doesn't have Actual lot qty and Insp. stock is checked. Now, when I create new inspection lot for same process order, the inspection lot has Actual lot qty and Insp. stock is unchecked.
In material master Post to insp. stock is checked.
Thanks for your help in advance.
Bhavesh Patel

Dear
U need to go for Order Change Management For doing This As u said ur Changing the Qty and it should reflect in the inspection lot
Please Follow this Link :
[http://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/scn/go/portal/prtroot/docs/library/uuid/f0002c1c-f07c-2c10-3c93-b053715529b4?QuickLink=index&overridelayout=true]
With Regards
Pushpalas

Connection between batch and inspection lot number

Hi all,
our GR in SAP triggers the creation of a batch number and an inspection lot number.
If I only know the batch number, where in SAP can I find the related inspection lot number?
Thanks
Anne

we have a Material Master that represents a semi-finished material that requires inspection at Goods Receipt from Production. In order to see the settings maintained for this material, click on the Insp. setup button:
More details
http://searchsap.techtarget.com/searchSAP/downloads/UsingDigitalSignaturesEMconvtSearchSAP.pdf
Kevin

Live View and Inspect BROKEN in DW CS5 & Drupal

I successfully navigated through the confusing instructions for setting up a local Drupal website in Dreamweaver's site manager and was very excited the first time I did a "discover" and DW found all the Drupal files on my local testing server. Yay!
I was even more excited when I tried live view and was able to click on elements in my Drupal page and see the CSS properties displayed. (similar to how Firebug in Firefox works)
Unfortunately, my excitement didn't last. The property inspector in DW CS5 is BROKEN. When you click on a specific element on the page, the "live code" displayed for that selection is wrong. DW tends to select far more code than the actual element chosen. As a result, the CSS properties displayed in the CSS panels are wrong for that particular element. Most of the time, they are the properties for the element (<div>) that WRAPS the selected element.
This makes the wonderful, Live View Inspect TOTALLY USELESS, for Drupal development. Didn't Adobe actually TEST this app with Drupal before distributing it? I just spent $600 on an upgrade to CS5 for NOTHING!

Not sure how I could translate the problem into a plain html file, since all the elements of Drupal are served up from a database and php server. Even if I could, I suspect it wouldn't reproduce the problem, since I have no issue with the Inspect button on static html files. One thing to note is that the box model on the selected element seems to accurately reflect the proper CSS settings, even though live code and CSS panels do not. So the out-of-sync issue seems to be between the box model and the live code and CSS panels.
It would be worth your while to set up a live Drupal site. Admittedly, there are a ton of different things going on within a Drupal page, including javascript, which I suppose could throw things out of sync. (although turning off javascript didn't fix the problem) Since Drupal is all open source, it would be easy for me to send a zipped codefile and mysql dump to your developers. Or you could recreate a site from Drupal.org. I have tested this against several iterations of Drupal with several different themes, some simple and some complex, and the problem is pretty consistent, although it behaves slightly differently depending on the Drupal theme being used.
On some themes, Inspect picks LESS than the proper amount of code. On some themes, it picks MORE. My theory is that it's some kind of mathematical or array issue with DW, because Firebug can reliably render all my Drupal sites with no issues at all.
Using the Tag Selector is difficult in most cases, because the Inspect selector tends to select an "outer" div instead of the one that is correct, so the correct selection is not shown on the tag selector list. (since the tag selector only shows outer divs to the currently selected one.) The convoluted workaround is to select an element INSIDE of the targeted element, and then backtrack up the Tag Selector tree. Selecting the proper code with the Tag Selector DOES appear to render the proper CSS and Live Code, but you obviously lose one of the biggest advantages of live view, which is to quickly find the proper element and see the visual box model rendered live.
This one issue will severely limit the attractiveness of DW to Drupal developers. But if you can get it working, I will be singing Dreamweaver's praises all over Drupal.org!
UPDATE: One other clue I just discovered while using several other Drupal themes: When selecting an element, live code appears to miss the first div and instead pick the following div. Example: (note, I'm using parentheses instead of brackets since this forum strips brackets)
(div id=first_div)some kind of text
(/div)
(div class=second_div)more text(/div)
The live code selection is in bold italic. Live code starts selecting AFTER the first div marker and grabs the start of the next div.
Sure seems like a mis-applied array element to me.

Relationship b/w Operation No. (VORNR) and Inspection Lot No. (PRUEFLOS)

i want to get multiple operation numbers (vornr) in against of inspection number (prueflos).
i have already linked both tables i.e (vornr from table plpo and prueflos from table qals). The statement is as follows :
SELECT single vornr FROM plpo
WHERE plnnr = itab-plnnr
and werks = itab-werk
AND steus = 'QM01'.
i am getting same operation number i.e "25" with all records but at back-end they are different i.e (For QM: 25, 35, 45 etc).
Regards..
Shahzad Sami

I have executed the view but i m not getting the desired results. Let me explain you the scenario again...
We have inspection lot no. i.e field "prueflos". (For Example : 30000000260) from table "qals".
Under this inspection no, we have multiple defects i.e Text field "kurztext" from table "qpct".
For Example :
1.Leakage A (Engine).
2.Dent B (Body).
When we record 'n' number of defects which lies under the single inspection lot no then there are 'n' number of operation number's that are associated with defects under the single inspection lot no..
My question is how could i join both tables that have defects and there associated operation numbers ????

Deleted delivery and inspection lot tracking

dear all,
i have an issue please guide me
the senario is
At my client , there is a delivery happening in vl01n i will pick the required quanity and send the lot to the QM for final doc audit then after the QC is passed it will released from the QM then i will do the Post Goods Issue .
the problem is here in the client    i have created a delivery document and i have picked the quantity and issued for the final doc audit report , during that time the goods which have been picked will be in the Scheduled for delivery .
Now if the quality check fails for( final doc auidit ( ie for pallletization ) or some nails and packing is not done properaly ) it has to go for rework for the final doc auidit .
If the quantity is rejected and gone for rework.    i will have to delete the delivery document and create a fresh delivery doccument .
because only if i delete the delivery document what ever the quanity is there in the Scheduled for delivery will be moved backed to the Bonded store .
and then only it is possible for the goods to be picked and send for QC and after QC pass PGI will be done
My problem is is there any connection can be done from the deleted delivery document and the fresh delivery document
so that
i can able to track the inspection lot generated in the both the deliveries   i.e ( the deleted one and the fresh delivery document for which the PGI is done )
Based on this i can create a zreport for the QCheck , becasue the client wants to have a link between the inspection lots generated between the two delivery documents and based on that they wanted to track the inspection lot

Hi
regarding the link between two delivery documents , as you are deleting the delivery the delivery document is not there in any table so you wont get the link even in the document flow table. or delivery table .
So its not feasible to generate link.
I would suggest a different approach ,pl investigate more before you go ahead,
You can have   seperate storage locations one with internal QC ,Other FG store and third final dispatch or BSR store.
When material is transferred from production to quallity store a inspection lot is generated .once it is cleared QM will have stocks in FG store .Materials in FG store should be availble for final audit and only material which is approved in all respects in transferred to BSR store from where it is immediately dispatched. so QM and other departments can always access the stock in QM for internal inspection , rework an dfinal dispatch through store location instead of delivery tracking.
I hope this helps
regards
Mandar

Vendor Evaluation and inspection type 17

All,
Iam using EWM QIE as a result of which i have to use inspection type 17. Does Vendor Evaluation work with inspection type 17. I know for a fact that in standard ECC Vendor Evaluation works with the 01 inspection type, but i am not sure of inspection type 17. Any input will be appreciated.
Thanks

Dear Ramki,
Thanks for your input; if I don't use the user exit, then the quality score is being shown there for the material level.
But still, there are a few problems:
1. Material wise Quality score, which is being displayed in ME64, is not getting updating in any of the table. Table ELBM is also blank. There is not even a single record.
2. The quality rating that is being calculated here is as per following:
     The user gives disposition for the incoming material as
          Qty accepted directly: A1
          Qty accepted after segregation: A2
          Qty accepted as major deviation: A3
          Qty accepted as minor deviation: A4
          Qty Rejected.     : A5
The formula is
Q.R. = (A11 + A2(-0.5) + A30.5 + A4(0.8) +A5(-1) - Line Rej. qty(-1)) /
               Total No. of Qty Received.
Final Q.R. = Q.R. - Mix up complaints*10 - Genuine complaints * 5
Since the formula have subtraction(negative quality score) also, I don't think that this subtraction or negative score would be able to capture in FM for Quality score procedure and the notification qty will not be able to be calculated.
So, to get the quality rating as per above and getting the same for the material wise also.
After that i need to get one report for vendor wise material wise report at month period.
How should I proceed?
Thanks once again for your valuable input.
Thanks & Regards,
SUMIT GUPTA

Material specification and Inspection plan - Task list usage

Dear Friends,
In inspection type Task list usage is assigned
For Example
inspection type 01 - usage - 03
inspection type 05 - usage - 05
inspection type 06 - usage - 07
inspection type 10 - usage - 06
In my scenario i want to use all the above inspection type for a product
if i use mateial specification there is no any problem with my Task list usage
If suppose i use inspection plan do i need to create different inspection plan with different usage
or is it possible to create one inspection plan with all the above usage
what about universal usage 03 can i use it
i try to use but system does not triggering inspection lot
can any one Suggest some ideas
Many Thanks & Regards
Raj

Hi Raju,
All of first pls understand the concept of Task list and specification.
If you need to inspection any material in very systematic manner, where you will have well segregated operations where the appropriate Work Centers will be bind and under that hierarchy MIC will be attached. The inspection will be governed by some inspection points. And according the the same Samples will be calculated. When you wanna go with all these functionality then you must have to use Task list (Inspection plan).
And if you don't wish to have these functions then simply go with the material specification.
Now it comes the actual query about task list usage.
If there is a common inspection plan is supposed to be used for all the inspection types for your material then you can prepare only one inspection plan, put ant of the Usage to it it can be 05 or 03 universal. But what you have to do is,
Go to SPRO->Quality Management->Quality Inspection->Inspection Lot Creation->Maintain Inspection Types Execute and set the Task list usage as the same it is set in the inspection plan for all those Inspection types for which that common inspection plan is supposed to be used.
Note:- There is no any link between inspection lot creation and task list usage of inspection plan.
Regards,
Shyamal

Bindable variable and WebServices

Hi,
I am new to flex and am trying to create a simple interactive application which interacts with a Web service.
I am using a button to trigger the web service call and want to display the data in a data grid component. I also have a Combo box which i am populating with the first column of the same web service's result set.
The problem I am facing is that both the components seem to have a lag of one click. Which means, when i click the Get Data button to trigger the web service call the first time, the web service returns data (verified by the web service logs) but it is not displayed on the data grid. The next time i click on the Get Data button, the data is displayed.
I have pasted the code below. Please let me know where i have gone wrong in it.
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<mx:Application xmlns:mx="http://www.adobe.com/2006/mxml"
backgroundGradientColors="[0xFFFFFF,0xAAAAAA]"
horizontalAlign="left"
verticalGap="15" horizontalGap="15" >
<mx:WebService id="dataFetching"
wsdl="http://localhost:8080/SRS/services/KeyDriversChainDataService?wsdl"
fault="mx.controls.Alert.show(event.fault.faultString)"
>
 <mx:operation name="getMRSMarkets">
 <mx:request>
 <viewType>DSB</viewType>
 <category>HOTS</category>
 <segment>ALL</segment>
 <tradingCo>ALL</tradingCo>
 <brand>ALL</brand>
 <timeframe>Weekly-TABLE</timeframe>
 <analyticType>SUMMARY</analyticType>
 <market>Total Coverage</market>
 </mx:request>
 </mx:operation>
</mx:WebService>
<mx:Script>
 <![CDATA[
 import mx.collections.ArrayCollection;
 import mx.rpc.events.ResultEvent;
 import mx.rpc.events.FaultEvent;
 [Bindable]
 public var distinctMrkt:ArrayCollection;
 private function getMarkets(): void{
 dataFetching.getMRSMarkets.send();
 distinctMrkt = dataFetching.getMRSMarkets.lastResult as ArrayCollection;
 table.dataProvider = distinctMrkt;
 private function showGraph(market:String):void{
 selected.text=market;
]]>
</mx:Script>
<mx:Button id="datafetch" label="Get Data" click="getMarkets()"/>
<mx:DataGrid id="table" width="100%" >
 <mx:columns>
 <mx:DataGridColumn dataField="a1_market" headerText="Market"/>
 <mx:DataGridColumn dataField="a2_analytic_type" headerText="Analytic Type"/>
 </mx:columns>
</mx:DataGrid>
<mx:ComboBox id="dropdown" dataProvider="{distinctMrkt}" labelField="a1_market"
click="showGraph(dropdown.selectedLabel)"/>
<mx:HBox>
 <mx:Label text="Selected item is: "/>
 <mx:Label id="selected" />
</mx:HBox>
</mx:Application>

Hi Abdellatif,
Ok, that would clarify things.
You have an idea if this is documented somewhere?
Reason we ask:the "xi3-1_designer_en" guide, the specification for the @variable function states:
"BusinessObjects system variables. ...
Report variables. ...
Operating system variables. You can enter Windows environment variables in order to obtain information about your installation.
Custom variables. With Desktop Intelligence, you can use a predefined text file to provide a list of fixed variable values."
There's no explicit referal to DeskI only for OS system variables, like there is for custom variables.
Thanks!
Raf

Metatags Bindable, CollapseWhiteSpace and Inspectable

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for